Why is 'Export file size small' big?

Similar Questions

• Why my export files are too big?

  When I try to make a video that I did (was a sound wave of music) and when I put a narrative that the exported file was too big and when he didn't know it was a time very short. What should I do to make my videos to smaller 1890p in size?

  Thank you.

  FAQ: Why my huge output file, and why didn't he play back smoothly in a media player?

• I tried a trial version of lightroom 6 and edited hundreds of photots I need to find the export files are small non-printable, about 600 kbs. So I bought lightroom 6 hoping to save my changes on all the photos. However with my purchase of more than a week

  I tried a trial version of lightroom 6 and edited hundreds of photots I need to find the export files are small non-printable, about 600 kbs. So I bought lightroom 6 hoping to save my changes on all the photos. However with my purchase of more than a week, my picture exports are still about 600 kbs. Not printable! I'm signed and registered. Whats happening?

  Looks like you have been in the library module and chose with a preset export or export to email. Whatever it is, your Presets 'export' were to reduce the size of the image exported to about 600 k.

  In Lightroom, the library module and under the file menu, simply select the Word Export. Who will open another dialog box. GO through each option in this dialog box to choose where you want to export the file, what color space to use, what name to give to each folder, what metadata to include and do not forget to select the export size! I included a few screenshots for your reference.

  If you export exactly the same path several times, you can create your own export preset to make this process faster.

  

• The Lightroom export file size: why it's so small? How can I maximize the picture quality?

  My image file size is much smaller after editing and export through Lightroom. It is impossible to maintain the size of the original file in order to preserve image quality? This small file size will have a negative impact on the prints? Any help is appreciated!

  The file size is not an indicator of picture quality! You are looking at the wrong measure.

  File size is determined by the number of pixels you have, the quality slider in the dialog box export and of a dozen other things, most of which you cannot control.

  Want to watch the number of pixels (width and height) and not the size of the file.

  It is impossible to maintain the size of the original file in order to preserve image quality?

  Not only is impossible, that it is also meaningless (see above)

  This small file size will have a negative impact on the prints?

  Instead look at the size of the file, you must look at the number of pixels of the exported photo (width and height), and this will determine if you get a decent impression. The usual standard is that you need 300 pixels per inch.

• Why an export file 2Mo ends as an export of 12 MB?

  Hi, see screen shot of my export preset Pleas. The exported files with this Dungeon preset on my desk in the form of files 12 MB - their original size.

  And how to export as png file?

  Thank you very much.

  

  Note, Raphael, of your screenshot above, ask photo 2 megapixel, in other words, you want Lightroom to shrink the size of the image at the bottom of what it was originally much smaller, resulting in a loss of quality.

  Do not confuse MegaPixels with megabytes. These are not the same things. One does not imply the other. You did not a picture of 2 megabytes of Lightroom, even if it sounds like that's what you want. And as stated, no software can provide a specific file size PSD file.

• More file size small .swf - best practices?

  I make the flash banner for a website of the College and the CBS guidelines require that all size of the file is less than 40 k.  How the hell can you do something with it?

  (A) unused library items don't effect the .swf file size?

  (B) I use a lower res .jpg for a background that is about 10 k, and each line of text that I use to only 40 images looks like 20 k! (3 sets of text = 60 k)  Why plain text is so great?

  Interpolations and clips video creation C) really seems to influence the size of the file, which is essentially correct?

  (D) all considered, is the main thing that affects the final size .swf, the size of each file used on the timeline? Is there a best practice for converting graphics graphics clips, clips video, symbols, etc. ?

  Answers to one of them would be much appreciated, this is driving me crazy. 40 k is so small!

  Thank you

  Damon

  (A) No, it does not affect the SWF file

  (B) create textfields and load image execution of external source

  (C) It will have an impact on the size to the minimum level, you can also use the tween class to animate

  (D) load bitmap from an external source

  Consider at least a level of Kbs.

• Why the JPG file size decreases when Lightroom writes meta data?

  Lightroom uses the files sidecar XMP for meta data history for RAW files. When writing the metadata (e.g. tags) to JPG files, they are written directly in the header of the file. This should leave the image information in the file intact. However, the file size decreases (about 0.02 MB) when Lightroom writes metadata for the original JPG file. As far as I could see, the image information remain unchanged and no other information in the header is deleated, but why decreases the size of the file then (I expect to increase slightly or stay the same)? I work with RAW files for most but sometimes I just versions of the files to work with JPG and I don't want to lose any information.

  Thanks in advance for your answers.

  Kind regards

  me

  The number 13 in FAQ on the web site of ExifTool treats this effect:

  http://OWL.PHY.queensu.ca/~Phil/ExifTool/FAQ.html#Q13

• Export file is too big, but the compression is very poor

  Hello

  I have a movie I did in Adobe Premiere, but when I export without compression, to two minutes comes up more than 5 concerts!  The quality is great, even lossless, but to tackle the problem of file size, I have chosen to compress during export.  The thing is any compression I use, (I tried divX, xvid, RADIUS cinepex or something) all seem to really make the bad quality.  I tried different settings.  is there something that you guys can recommend?

  My images are mostly people who talk to each other, with restricted circulation in the market.  Nothing fast like a sporting event, or anything.  Thanks a lot guys.  PS: If it helps, I can leave my computer on days, something to code if this makes it of superior quality while keeping the size low.

  miniDV is 720 x 480 resolution, No 852 x 480. For DVD use DL again and let them manipulate. That's what it's for. Follow the directions to YouTube YouTube gives you for encoding. They seem to change their needs very often, if not every week.

  How did you capture miniDV matter? How did you 852 x 480 resolution?

• Why is my file size "Combined PDF" smaller than the original files?

  Hello!

  I try to combine two individual PDF files into a single PDF file. Each file is 32 MB, but when I use acrobat to combine, the newly created "combined" file is only 19 MB. I think I took the necessary steps to ensure no degradation that happens (e.g. large selection size of the file in the Panel options), but I'm still puzzled as to how the two files can be set up as one and be smaller than the two separate files with out any compression. What Miss me?

  Thanks in advance!

  When you combine a file, it performs an operation of "save under".  This rewrites all the PDF object in the single file and is supposed to clean the file, while the single files may have had several saves which when you look at the inner workings of the PDF file simply add at the end of the file.  In other words, you get a file more cleanly written and optimized is also recorded for a quick display of Web pages.

• Exported file is smaller than I thought

  Help, pls! When I exported an illustrator file, it became smaller than the frame. I already tried to change the resolution to 1920x1280px but I still get a small image. When I try to export the png file, it seems that the image has another training, greater than the work plan.

  you will need to give more info.

  Anyway, I'm not psychic, but you might have a bigger plan of work that overlap the work that you are trying to export and you export the largest work plan.

  Another possibility could be that you have not the option 'use work plans' is selected when you export, so your export is the size of all the objects on your file, not just the artboard, you are working on.

• Why archive log file size constantly change?

  I have a question related to the size of the archive log file:
  I constantly receive a different size to the size of the log file archive, of course, they are smaller than to the size of the log file.
  A guru can explain to me: what possible reason could be?
  Thanks in advance!

  It can happen due to several reasons:

  When you perform a manual archive (via ALTER SYSTEM ARCHIVE LOG CURRENT/ALL)
  When Oracle must respect your ARCHIVE_LAG_TARGET (defined in seconds)

  Unless you do a manual check-in, your parameter ARCHIVE_LAG_TARGET is the reason why you see Archives of logs with different sizes as Oracle has archived the redo log as soon as the time ARCHIVE_LAG_TARGET is reached. Even if the redo log is not full, Oracle will always have to archive the redo log.

• export file much smaller than expected

  Hi all.
  
  Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - 64 bit Production
  PL/SQL Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
  CORE Production 9.2.0.3.0
  AMT for Solaris: release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
  
  SunOS rcworarpt 5.9 Generic_112233-07 sun4u sparc SUNW, Sun-Fire-480R
  
  
  We are moving from our primary database (95 GB) out of a box of Sun and on a HP - UX server. I use imp/exp to get there. I have copied our production database in development and made a full export:
  
  System Manager/exp file = vdev1_full.dmp full = y log = vdev1_full.log
  
  The newspaper said that export is complete properly without error but the dump file is only about 27 GB.
  
  [rcworarpt] / u04/backup/jamie > ls - lrt vdev1_full.dmp
  -rw - r - r - 1 oracle dba 27778671616 Mar 9 15:03 vdev1_full.dmp
  
  I know that he will cancel it, redo logs etc. but this seems pretty small to me.
  Through the OEM, looks like it should be about 80 GB for all areas of storage (data as index)
  
  I'm trying by exporting to several files in the image that I can hit a limit of the OS... I'll post the results of that when it ends...
  
  Meanwhile if anyone has additional advice on my export do not hesitate to comment.
  
  Thank you

  >
  ...
  Through the OEM, looks like it should be about 80 GB for all areas of storage (data as index)
  ...
  >
  For indexes, nothing is exported except metadata (DDL). The only actually exported data rows in the table. The indexes are re-created from the data in the imported table. Also, over time some tables may actually have more space allocated to them that they are actually using - deletions, and all. Similarly for the index. Therefore, it seems quite reasonable, the discharge of size you have.

• Why is my migrated size smaller photo library?

  Hello

  I've migrated just my iPhoto for pictures library. He created a new photo library, but it is quite a bit smaller than the migrated iPhotos library. This concerned me. According to Finder, the old library of iPhotos is 105 GB and the new photo library is 90 GB, for a difference of 15 GB. I read in a few places online that said that two libraries should be about the same size. However, I opened the two libraries in their respective applications and did a 'get info' check, and they say they have the same number of photos, videos, size of storage and date range (3870 photos, 658 videos, 84 gb, from date date X). What is the cause of this difference between the two libraries 15 GB Finder?

  Thank you!

  Joe

  He could have a big iPod photo in your iPhoto library cache, if synchronize you with iTunes library.  See this link:

  iTunes: understand the folder iPod Photo Cache

• Why keep my canvas size smaller than what I get in the boxes?

  I did a book cover for a printing company and they have come back to me twice now - basically, I think that the measures are not good and they may not format correctly for printing.

  The Web is supposed to be 316mm wide and 216mm in height, with a 300px dpi. However, when I look at how big the Web is (Image > canvas size) he always says 315.98 215.98 x, no matter how many times I try to resize it. I'm not entirely sure how printing doing things, but I think this 0.2 mm could make a difference. The same happens when I create a new file. I want to do a 3 mm x 210 mm canvas, because I need a margin of 3mm on each edge (where the extra 6mm in width and height of the A4 size 310 x 210). However, this new canvas is also then 2.96 x 209.97 mm. So when I want to use it as a guide on the edges, I'm a total of 0.8 mm - so I think this could really make a difference.

  I tried to search to see if anyone had the same problem but couldn't find anything. It would be nice if it's just a problem I supervise and allows to correct quickly. Printing needs coverage again as soon as possible, so a quick response would be great.

  I use:

  • 8.1 Windows 64-bit (up to date)
  • Photoshop CS6 13.0.1 x 64

  At 300 dpi, would become 316 mm ~ 3732,28 pixels. Since you need an integer pixel value, the result is the rounded 3732 pixel dimension. Return calculated, which would be ~ 315,98 mm.

  Benjamin

• PE 7 - export file size is very large

  Hello

  I am to convert VHS tapes to digital format and wanted to use first Elements 7 to change my home movies. I use my VCR to write of VHS on DVD, and then copy the files from the DVD to my computer. A two hour movie equals 9 files of 250 MB, but after that I put in a unique scenario and export them to Microsoft DV AVI, the file is 27 GB. I know that video files are not small, but I don't understand what is happening to convert 2.25 gb entry into a file over ten times. The original DVD files are very well from a quality point of view (in other words, they are at least as good as the original VHS quality), but I would like to do some editting and then polishing on them before putting them on a DVD in the format "final". Advice on how to achieve this more effectively would be appreciated.

  Thank you.

  Dan

  "I don't think that the 27 GB file would be same not hold on the new blu - ray format, not to mention the standard DVD that would play in my player of DVD family."...

  Export/burning 27 Gb DV - AVI will be transcoded to a VOB MPEG2 4.7 GB file that fits on the DVD. Please note however burn 2 hours on a DVD in a lower bitrate, DVD quality compared to burn an hour on a DVD... that is what you can fit on a DVD with a bitrate of PE7 higher 8 Mb/s. The bitrate will be automatically reduced to fit the video on the DVD. Burn a copy and see what it looks like--even at the lower rate as ok, it should look like your source files are VHS.