1230 AP Cisco VLAN

Similar Questions

• CSCue87491 - CISCO-VLAN-MEMBERSHIP-MIB incorrectly indicates membership of the port

  I'm really looking forward to this problem is resolved. He has been an impact on us since we deployed our first 7 Sup for more than a year.

  Seems to be resolved:

  The problem is caused by the CSCue87491bug. You can try to upgrade to IOS XE 3.5.0E 15.2 (01) E, where the issue is not seen.

  Download IOS XE 3.5.0E url 15.2 (01) E for SUP7 4510R/4500-E:

  http://software.Cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=283289791&flowid=19223&softwareid=282046477&release=3.5.0E&relind=available&rellifecycle=Ed&RelType=latest

  [4]

• Q on the frames jumbo and implementation of vlan separate

  Why do you recommend to set aside a VLAN for data frames between the hosts ISCSI and EQ?

  There is another reason to avoid the defaul VLAN: with switches Cisco VLAN 1 only supports the standard frames (1500 bytes).  Since this is the default VLAN, Cisco will attempt to deliver all packages, including jumbo frames.  When the switch is busy, larger packages can be filed (leading to inconsistent behavior with jumbo frames).  Will we apply the MTU set for other VLANs (correct behavior will pass every time frames, or none of the time).

  This inconsistency of chassis can be difficult to resolve - I had two W2K3 servers connected to my San.  The two servers to discover them, connect and their volumes of partition, but we'd always unplug when I am gone for formatting (the other worked).  The job server connected via standard frames so that the problematic one connected to 9000 bytes.  Solved the problem by setting the NIC in the server to standard frames immediately (additional tests with a VLAN different show that the two servers could work properly with jumbo frames).

  I've been able to reproduce these results with a PowerConnect switch and include many Cisco providers follow regarding this problem.

• Trunk port config on Vswitches

  Hi all, sorry for the double post, but I put the old thread as "answered" a little too fast, still problems with the trunk of our catalyst for cisco 2960 switch VMware, see the discussion

  "dot1q Native Vlan Trunking Problems."

  hope that explains the problem remember clearly,

  Basically,.

  in the ESX environment, we have 4 groups, the physical host on all the vlan, a group of servers on vlan 16, an on the vlan 20 and 1 on vlan 30.

  In our environment, Cisco vlan native is 100, servers are on vlan16, the trunk for esx server is configured with the following IOS commands:

  int gi0/20

  Description link to Virtual Switch

  switchport mode trunk

  switchport trunk vlan native 16

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,16,20,30,99

  spanning tree guard root

  IP-surveillance dhcp trust

  We tried with the native trunk on vlan 100, but we have lost connectivity to the host

  We want to get the switch working with host physical and VMs on VLAN specific.

  Cheers for any help you can give

  In your config file, you need to define a vlan 100 native and your service console to use 16 VLAN so your connection does not work as expected.

  -KjB

  VMware vExpert

• Compatibility of VLAN with Cisco

  Hello

  We just bought 10 x new Netgear switches (all M4100) to add to an existing Cisco infrastructure.

  Simple configuration with only 6 Valns.

  5: Admin, 30: VOIP, 101: management, 100: a set of Workstations, 102: second series of Workstations, 200: IPTV, 400: Internet, 401: Wireless Management

  All I wanted to do was: 2 last ports each switch netgear = T and all the VLANS. I have not identified all ports if I want to use in the appropriate vlan

  101 of VLAN is my Managementt Vlan. (Need to configure inter vlan routing for this to work)

  I only turned on three switches up to now and all three do not work. They work for a while and that packets but do not receive all.

  What I am doing wrong?

  What I need to get rid of the original vlan1 on the netgear?

  Is that what I need config in the STP to make these compatible with Cisco (300 and 400 series) switches.

  I use an optical backbone on Cisco and Netgear switches.

  Sincere greetings,

  OLAF

  Hi Moussa,.

  Thanks for reaching out.

  We got it working.

  Step 1: upgrade to the latest firmware.

  Step 2: Forget the MISTLETOE.

  We had a few questions about the old firmware - causing links to trunk have some incompatibility with their tag and removed the images between Cisco and Netgear brand.

  After the upgrade of the firmware that we had access to "switchport mode access" and "switchport mode trunk" orders fixing the access port and trunking issues.

  Thank you Mr President,

  OLAF

• SWITCH Cisco/Linksys SLM224G: Problem with the VLAN

  Hello!

  I'm trying to set up a VLAN in my baskets. I have some knowledge about VLANs, but I still can not configure in my path.

  My situation:

  I have PC that contains two virtual machines, which works as a router between three networks: LAN, WAN, LAN2. It's a bit complicated, but I'll try to draw:

                                                   |-------------||----------------------------|                   |           e1|-to-eth1-VM2-----WAN|VirtualMachine 1        eth0|---trunk-VLAN1&2---|g1         e2|-to-eth0-VM2-----LAN2|eth0=VLAN1 eth1=VLAN2       |                   |           e3|-to-eth0-VM2-----LAN2 etc.|                         PC |                   |   SWITCH  e4||VirtualMachine 2            |                   |           e5|-to-eth1-VM1---wire-to-LAN2|eth0=VLAN3 eth1=VLAN4   eth1|---trunk-VLAN3&4---|g2         e6|-to-eth0-VM1-----LAN1|----------------------------|                   |           e7|-to-eth0-VM1-----LAN1 etc.                                                 |-------------|
  
  gX = Gigabit portseX = 100Mbit portsVMX = Virtual machine numberwire-to = patch-cord connection between ports on the switch
  
  Schema of routing and logical visibility:
  
  LAN1---VM1-----VM2---WAN              |LAN2----------|
  

  Important note is that LAN1 and LAN2 must be separated (visible only through routers). WAN must be visible through VM2 to LAN2 and through by VM1 and VM2 to LAN1. It seems easy, but VLAN that I did on this passage seems doesn't work.

  I do it like this:

  Step 1: Management of VLANS / create a VLAN...

  Creation of VLANS 1, 2, 3, 4 (numbers meters right now - I have now this number 1 is restricted to the switch).

  Step 2: Management of VLAN / Port to VLAN...

  Setting up VLAN1 with ports g1, e5 (the two labelled or not identified?-I have not seen any difference)

  Implementation VLAN2 with ports g1, e6, e7, etc...

  Implementation VLAN3 with ports g2, e2, e3, etc...

  Setting up VLAN4 with g2, e1 ports

  Step 3: Management of VLAN / Port setting...

  Implementation of ports e1 to PVID4 (chassis type = all I guess, but with "capture filter"?)

  Setting up port e2 at PVID3

  Setting up port PVID3 e3

  etc...

  Setting up port e5 for PVID1

  Setting up port e6 at PVID2

  Setting up port e7 for PVID2

  etc...

  Thus, on this configuration and that the switch it does not work for me

  I know that the switch is to see Mac since VLAN which is carried out by PC, because when I arrive in "Admin / dynamic address" I see pimps on the correct ports, with good VLAN ID. So the problem is to transmit a VLAN for their ports, then clear frames of ID and let the packets to go (and return: clear packages, add the VLAN ID and send to their Gigabit ports).

  Show the configuration is one of the many I tried :/ but I think this one is the best.

  Or maybe I don't know VLAN as I think and this scheme is impossible? Please tell me.

  Concerning

  and waiting for any suggestions,

  READ

  Hello.

  These products are processed by the Cisco Small Business Support Community.

  * If my post answered your question, please mark it as "acceptable Solution".

  * Do not forget to give a 'congratulations '. Thank you!

• Trunk of SPF VLAN DELL 2724 with Cisco catalyst 3560

  Trying to trunk one VLAN of the 3560 to the 2724 via ports of SPF. The VIRTUAL LAN has been created on the two switches and ports of SPF are also members here. The built-in SPF port tool diagnostic claims everything works, but it is not permanently most. Any help would be greatly apprechiated.

  Here is the cisco information:

  The 3560 is set in transparent mode and should function as a CE router. The SPF here link has the value dot1.q and the VLAN I try to propegate the 2724 is 104.

  Message edited by e0asto on 04/09/2008 03:37
  Message edited by e0asto on 04/09/2008 03:38
  
  

• Cisco asa active multiple interfaces on a single switch without configuration of vlan switch.

  I was wondering if there is a work around on cisco asa to have 2 interfaces vlan on a switch. The reason I ask I have a cisco asa 5505 and a dell switch that does not support the configuration of VLANs. I set up 2 interface vlan on a cisco asa and when two interfaces are active my internet drops frequently. I was wondering if there is nothing to configure the asa cisco to make this thing work. Thanks in advance...

  Assuming that Dell switch at least linking several interfaces of the ASA to the Dell should translate all media spanning tree protocols, but a bet covering the tree blocking State to avoid a tree covering loop.

  If the Dell does not support tree covering weight then you would be in very bad shape each broadcast packet would be will loop indefinitely and cause what we call a 'broadcast storm. "

  One way is not good and the other real harm.

• How to configure the VLAN-access plan on Cisco 3650

  Hello

  I would like to configure the VLan-access plan to filter some of the traffic VLAN, but I am unable to run vlan-map command on the cisco L3 3650 v03.06.00E

  Hello ahmed,.

  According to the command search tool, 3650 v03.06.00E does not support the vlan-access plan.

  You will need to catalyst 3650, 3SE to configure "vlan access map.

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/support/CLILookup/cltSearchAction.do

  Show vlan-plan of access (catalyst 3650, 3SE)

  VLAN-access plan (catalyst 3650, 3SE)

  I hope this helps.

  Please evaluate the useful messages.

  Thank you.

• Questions of VLAN and configuration for Cisco AIR-CT2504-25-K9 Controller

  Hello

  It's my first time thanks to the Cisco wireless solutions, so I was hopping someone could help me with the following:

  We just bought the AIR-CT2504-25-K9 controller with some points of access for the AIR-CAP1702I-E-K9.

  The network is as follows:

  Peripheral layer 3 (managed by third parties): it's on the domain network. (VLAN by default, 1 - unidentified)

  ADSL router - it's the network without comment thread. (Default Vlan 4 - tagged).

  VOIP: VLAN 5.

  Both fittings go into a switch Cisco SG500 52 (Layer 2). There is a port to shared resources on the switch SG500 with VLAN 1 (Tagged) and VLAN 4 (with tag). The WLAN controller is plugged into this port trunking.

  The data and management network are in the same subnet and on the same VLAN (1).

  I used the wizard on the controller setup.

  There are three interfaces:

  management VLAN ID 1 IP 192.168.1.2 Port 1 (configured with a gateway domain network, DHCP, etc.).

  VLAN wireless identifier 4 IP 192.168.5.1 Port 1 comments (configured with modem router ADSL, DHCP, etc.).

  Virtual IP 192.0.2.1

  Proxy DHCP active overall.

  There are two wlan networks:

  (1) area - management Interface - SSID abc.

  (2) comments - comments Wireless Interface - SSID xyz (the wizard put to management, but I changed it to the wireless).

  Are the AP connected to another SG500 switch which is shared resources to the switch with the controller.

  Ports of the APs are connected to have only 1 VLAN unidentified. They don't have 4 VLAN Tag or not identified. However, everything seems to work as expected.

  When I join the guest network (SSID xyz), I get an IP address from the router ADSL and all Internet traffic goes through him. When I connect to the domain network (SSID abc), I get an IP address from the DHCP in Windows Server and all traffic goes through the device of layer 3 (I checked the public IP address in my browser). I can't ping anything from one network to the other.

  My questions are the following:

  (1) how the guest network traffic (VLAN 4) headed the APs controller when they are connected to the ports on VLAN1? Is it because the traffic is encapsulated?

  (2) is set up correctly? After you configure the controller, I saw a note in the forums, this State I can simply enter 0 for the management of VLANS to let it not identified. However, in my case, I kept it as 1, which is the same as the switches and then the tag VLAN on the switch. In addition, the set Wizard wlan of comments to use the management interface but I changed it to use the comments interface.

  (3) when I connect to the APs of the controller, I see several options that can be configured manually. Is it necessary for this? For example, there is an option of data encryption.

  Thank you

  A

  Hello

  (1) how the guest network traffic (VLAN 4) headed the APs controller when they are connected to the ports on VLAN1? Is it because the traffic is encapsulated?

  Yes, I'm with CAPWAP:

  More information: http://lets-start-to-learn.blogspot.de/2014/08/cisco-wireless-understand...

  (2) is set up correctly? After you configure the controller, I saw a note in the forums, this State I can simply enter 0 for the management of VLANS to let it not identified. However, in my case, I kept it as 1, which is the same as the switches and then the tag VLAN on the switch. In addition, the set Wizard wlan of comments to use the management interface but I changed it to use the comments interface.

  If you want that mgmt interface must be unmarked and then put 0 otherwise you can use vlan 1.

  I do not have what is configured under mgmt and comments interface, but according to the name I'll say yes, you must set the comments under comments wlan interface.

  (3) when I connect to the APs of the controller, I see several options that can be configured manually. Is it necessary for this? For example, there is an option of data encryption.

  Yes, there are many things that you can configure, but I'll leave most of the default of things unless you really need to change!

  The following best practices: http://www.borderlessccie.net/?p=270

  Concerning

  Remember messages useful rates

• Reserved Vlan ID in Cisco UCS

  I understand that to be true with Cisco UCS platform:

  "you cannot create a VLAN with ID from 3968 to 4047. This VLAN ID range is reserved. »

  I have a private network 172.16.x.x North on my network is in the vlan what ID 4001, I wanted to present this southbound on NGC.  Maybe it's a stupid question but the only way to be arounf to change the Vlan ID to the one who is sitting in the pool of UCS Vlan IDS that are allowed?

  Yes, unfortunately

• How to add a VLAN to trunk on Cisco SF200-24 port

  Hi all

  I have question want to ask:

  I have Cisco switch SF200-24, I want to Setup VLAN as below:

  1 to 10 of Harbour = Vlan 100

  11 to 21 Harbour = Vlan 200

  22-24 Harbour = Vlan 300

  Port GE1 = Trunking (primary)

  Port GE2 = Trunking (secondary)

  How to add all the VLAN 100, 200, 300 go through primary and secondary circuits?

  What port should I connect to management switch?

  Thank you

  > How to add every VLAN 100, 200, 300 go through primary and secondary circuits?

  first set the ports as trunks via the "VLAN management'-> 'Settings of the Interface' - click on the corresponding port, click on the button"Edit"and select"Trunk"in the list.

  Once these (GE1 and GE2) ports as trunks, you can now assign all the VLANS you want through "Management of VLAN"-> "a Port VLAN membership." Select the first port (GE1), click on "join the VLAN" and select VLAN all desired from the list on the left and put them in the list on the right.

  and you're done.

  > Which port I can connect to management switch?

  the default management IP switch is part of the default VLAN1. If you want to keep access to the switch, assign "VLAN1" to one of the ports of access, or change management VLAN number other than 1 - but in this case remember to apply the correct IP settings in order to satisfy the subnet assigned to the new VIRTUAL LAN.

• Cannot connect the switch Cisco Cisco SG300 - 28 p spend and traffic through VLANS

  Try to connect the Cisco SG300 - 28 p switch to another switch and proceed 2 VLANS between them.  Not doing any circuit.  If I connect a computer to the port on the SG300 - 28 p I can access the VLAN 2 and take a DHCP address. However, when I connect to another switch on the port and connect it to a port on another switch secondary I am unable to access VLAN 2 and pull an IP address.  I checked that the works of secondary switch (WS-C3560G-48PS-S) connected to the other 3500 s, but not this latest SG300 - 28 p.  Here's the configuration for both, I'm leaving areas that shouldn't matter and add if necessary.  Try to connect the SG300 - 28 p Port 26-WS-C3560 Port 1 port.  Once again, if I connect a computer to port 26 on the SG300 - 28 p I access the VLAN 2 as expected, but not when I connect to channel 2 on the secondary switch.

  Cisco SG300 - 28 p

  !
  interface vlan 1
  Internet name
  !
  interface vlan 2
  LAN name
  IP 172.20.5.11 255.255.0.0
  no ip address dhcp (this is the VLAN I'm moving)
  !
  interface vlan 3
  private name
  !
  interface vlan 4
  name of Nortel
  !
  interface vlan 101
  name Video_Project
  !
  interface gigabitethernet26
  Description VLAN2-ACCESS-CISCO3500
  switchport mode access
  switchport access vlan 2 (this goes to port 1 on the other Cisco 3500 switch to provide access 2 VLAN)

  Cisco 3500

  !
  interface Vlan1
  NATCO Internet description
  no ip address
  no ip route cache
  no ip mroute-cache
  !
  interface Vlan2
  NATCO LAN description
  IP 172.20.5.13 255.255.0.0
  no ip route cache
  no ip mroute-cache (this is the VLAN I'm moving)

  !
  interface Vlan3
  Description LHPrivate
  no ip address
  no ip route cache
  no ip mroute-cache
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/1
  switchport access vlan 2 (this is the port that I connect to the SG300 - 28 p)

  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/2
  switchport access vlan 2 (this is the port I hang my computer to and trying to access VLAN 2 other switch)

  Hello

  Yes, STP is the problem here. As you can see on your release of the Cisco 3500 switch, port Gi0/1 is BKN (The FEW is a shortened form of "Broken").

  This is caused by an incompatibility of versions PLEASE used between the two switches. Small businesses (including series SG300) switches are use legacy STP or Rapid STP (your case), but uses templates to business (such as catalyst 3500) PVST + (each VLAN spanning tree version of STP).

  Two versions between group of switches are compatible only under certain conditions. Important condition is that the two switchports needs to use a VLAN 1, vlan access/native and not any other number VLAN.

  It is to make your communication work, you must:

  • disable the STP at least 3500 Cisco switch:
    • on overall global (Switch (config) # no vlan spanning tree 2)
    • or by the base interface (switch(config-if) # no vlan spanning tree 2)
  • change the configuration of your connection between two switches by following the path:
    • change the switchport trunk (trunk switchport mode) mode
    • do 1 VLAN as native vlan (vlan switchport trunk native 1)
    • Towing VLAN 2 as vlan tagged on that Stump (switchport trunk allow vlan add 2)

• Cisco NAC appliance - after a success does not change users to connect to the vlan propper

  Hello

  I am new to cisco NAC BURNERS and I have to troubleshoot an implementation. It is a real OOB IP gateway configuration. Users can connect to the Pentecost the CCA, but after the connection of this success, they remain on the role not authenticated, as well as on this vlan. I checked the SNMP protocol and seems to work very well. Also, I checked the logs on nac_manager.log and there is nothing surprising, in fact I see nothing about this user or IP address that connects.

  Also the user does not appear on the list of users online on cam.

  Can someone help me figure out how can I fix? version 4.8, I'll post any information requested

  Thank you

  We recently had the problem with Windows AD SSO and Windows 7 clients.

  Would authenticate the XP clients very well, however, Windows 7 clients would not authenticate and will remain just on the authenticated vlan.

  Our question was looking for CASE SSO account, we installed on AD. It only support the encryption, WHICH has no Windows 7 64. We turned off "Use OF THE encryption" on the account authentication UNIQUE AD and re-tested.

  What are the parameters of the port-profile to which is applied the switchport?

  What is the map settings vlan ports trunk not approved or confidence?

• Cisco SG500 and VLAN

  OK so here is what I try to accomplish with 3 switch Cisco SG500-52. I created 4 VLANS on a SG500 I call my central office switch and it is set in routing mode. My VLAN is thus 400 (Infrastructure ESXI hosts, firewall, etc.), 401 (VoIP), 402 (users) and 403 (wireless). I have configured interfaces and the delivery without problem for me through my subnets and the communities of remote access through 3 offices.

  Where I'm not sure is on the SG500 I set as a L2 switch and my ESXi host are connected (I have 10 ports on one VLAN remote iSCSI traffic) is that I have to create VLAN 400 and mark those ports not marked? So should I use 1-2 ports and set them as ports and tag to my main switch 400?

  In the affirmative on the main switch I create junction ports and mark for the VLAN on the switch that could access the L2 switch? Is this also the case for the other SG500 I have who are all devices for 402 VLAN?

  I'm overloading it?

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  Hi Sdonnelly2,

  For vlan 402 and 400 on the uplink to your sg500 (L2) would be 400U and 402 T.

  Other interfaces for VoIP phones on vlan 401 would be configured to 401 T. This is if your phones expect traffic labeled, otherwise they would be configured to 401U.

  For Vlan 402 other interfaces would still be 402U. PC only contacted untagged traffic

  For 403 Vlan wireless uplink access point must be configured (400U, 401, 402, 403T)

  It is perhaps more information than expected, but I hope that I have answered other questions you had.