32-bit patch

Similar Questions

• The 64-bit patch is ready for 12 Director? If we cannot publish to IOS?

  The 64-bit patch is ready for 12 Director? If we cannot publish to IOS?

  Thank you

  Hello Javier,

  I just sent you

  The answer is YES

  RJ and I have recently released iOS educational apps built with the Director.

  If anyone needs this fix 64 bit D12 iOS - private message me please.

  (PS - I highly recommend buying otto 'RJ' with all the xtras added iOS - like video)

• Update DST with 64 bit

  Hi, I tried several times to update daylight savings fix for 64-bit for my HTC HD2 smartphone. I use Office 2010, W7 and when I download the 64-bit patch it returns an error advising that the 32-bit is already installed, which is not. My smartphone returns constantly return to Sydney, frustrating time. Please help. Windu

  Windu

  If it's Windows Phone 7, start here: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsphone/en-us/howto/wp7/basics/phone-updates.aspx

  If Windows Phone 6.5, start here: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsphone/en-us/howto/wp6/setup/set-up-windows-phone-6-5.aspx

  ~ Robear Dyer (PA Bear) ~ MS MVP (that is to say, mail, security, Windows & Update Services) since 2002 ~ WARNING: MS MVPs represent or work for Microsoft

• looking for patch: 13965211

  Hello

  on 11.2.0.3

  I'm looking for this patch: 13965211

  That's the bug
  12880299

  I can't find it on e-delivery. Nor on metalink.

  In the document 1453883.1

  It is said that:

  Availability of the Windows fix for bugfix:12880299
  11.2.0.3: 12880299 is included in the package 6 (released)
  --------
  32-bit: Patch 13965210
  64-bit: Patch 13965211

  
  

  Where can I download it?

  
  

  Thank you.
  

  
  

  PL see MOS Doc 12880299.8 for a list of the versions as this bug is fixed in.

  HTH

  Srini

• Oracle homes 32-bit or 64-bit?

  Hi all

  I work on Sun Solaris Sparc 64-bit system, EBS R12.1.3.

  When I apply the patches to applications, we go with 32-bit tasks. Even when we walked past java, we used 32-bit java.

  Now, I have to apply some opatches at Oracle 10.1.2 and 10.1.3 respectively, until I have to download patches-32-bit or 64-bit?

  Please suggest!

  Thank you

  Moor

  I work on Sun Solaris Sparc 64-bit system, EBS R12.1.3.

  I think your EBS installation is 64-bit.

  When I apply the patches to applications, we go with 32-bit tasks. Even when we walked past java, we used 32-bit java.

  If 64-bit patches are not available, then you can go safely with 32-bit tasks. JRE/JDK update is an exception, and this explains why he had to go with 32-bit.

  Now, I have to apply some opatches at Oracle 10.1.2 and 10.1.3 respectively, until I have to download patches-32-bit or 64-bit?

  Download patches for "Oracle Solaris on SPARC (64-bit)".

  Thank you

  Hussein

• Pachting Oracle 11.1 under Windows 2008 32 bit

  Hello community, Oracle,.
  
  I installed a publishing standard oracle 11.1.0.7.0 under windows 2008 32 bit. When you create a database, I get an ORA-12560 error. I had this problem before, and the solution was, pachting the first instance, and then install the database with the dbca Wizard. Now my question is what is the best practice to patch the database to keep up-to-date. When you use advanced search in metalink didn't group patches, but 97 fixes some older then 1 year. I'm a bit confused and do not know which patch I have to install.
  
  Krischer

  You will find the link in the note mentioned under 32-bit patches.

  Werner

• Oracle 10 g 2 on SuSe Enterprise Server 10 - patch error

  Can someone tell me if they have had the experience to properly patched Oracle 10 g 2 on Suse Linux?
  
  I encountered this error during the installation of the patch,
  
  Error in invoking target 'client_sharedlib' of makefile ' / opt/oracle/product/10.2/db_1/network/lib/ins_net_client.mk'
  
  I managed to install Oracle 10 g 2 on SuSe Enterprise Server 10 operating system without any
  error.
  
  OS: SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64)
  VERSION = 10
  PATCHLEVEL = 2
  
  Kernel: 2.6.16.60 - 0.21 - xen
  
  The Oracle installer: 10201_database_linux_x86_64.cpio.gz
  
  Patch: p6810189_10204_Linux_x86.zip
  
  Hope someone can give some idea to fix this error. I reviewing the log file.
  
  Thank you.

  Hi Ronald,.

  I'll install p5337014_10203_Linux - x 86 - 64.zip and check if OK.

  You can install the 10.2.0.3 Group of hotfixes also. I suggest you go to 10.2.0.4 patches group which is also available in version in64 bits for Linux.

  The Group of hotfixes you downloaded is for Linux X 86-32 bit. There is a 64-bit patch is also available for the Group of hotfixes 10.2.0.4.

  Please select Linux X 86 - 64 platform and language in the list.

  Hope it should work.

  Kind regards
  Xaheer

• 11i Find Notifications error on 64 Bit SPARC from Sun

  Hello
  
  We 11i and workflow 2.6.0 and find Notifications link gives error on the Page "" document. " WF_FIND.NID.value'.
  
  This error has been identified in Doc ID: 224602.1 and ask to apply patch 2719596 .
  
  But our server is Sun Sparc Solaris 5.9 (5.9 Generic_122300-07 sun4u sparc SUNW, Sun-Fire) on 64-bit. This patch is only available in 32-bit Sparc from Sun.
  
  How to apply this hotfix on Sun 64 bit?
  
  Please let us know.
  
  
  Thank you!

  Hello

  It will not damage your existing installation and if the patch is not compatible the adpatch will not proceed with the installation of the patch and the adpatch session is then interrupted. Usually, when the 64-bit version of the patch is not available, you will need to download the 32-bit patch.

  Kind regards
  Hussein

• Patch installation error 6344567

  Hi Experts,
  
  I installed windows Oracle 10.2.0.3.0 on my windows xp OS.
  While I was looking for the fix on Bug 5169247 -Dump (e.g. in qkarid) to SELECT for UPDATE after the elimination of the table
  
  The patch that this correction is:
  ORACLE 10.2.0.3 PATCH 10 BUG FOR MICROSOFT WINDOWS 32-BIT- Patch 6344567
  
  Then download Patch 10 p6344567_10203_WINNT
  
  Stop all oracle services and now when I try to run "optach applicable", he proceeds to some extent then fails at this point
  
  Following actions have failed:
  Failure of the copy of ' C:\setups\Oracle\p6344567_10203_WINNT\6344567\files\bin
  \oci.dll' at ' C:\oracle\product\10.2.0\bin\oci.dll'...*
  
  The file OCI.dll is in place, what could be the reason for the failure.
  Please answer.
  
  Kind regards
  Neuron

  Just to add to what Werner stressed, it did not work for me once someone had played with the rights to the folder. So I had to rename the DLL manually (I couldn't move and cut-paste that file to the other place because of rights), then copied the patch file oci.dll. It worked.

• Update Service OR

  When I started LabVIEW today I received a pop-up dialog box for Update Service OR who told me to install the following hotfixes: LabVIEW 2011 SP1 32-bit Patch and F1 2011 LabVIEW RT engine 5.6.1 F5 Patch. The tool has been run with the progress bar along when I tried to access the Help menu to learn more about what I was doing progress. I guess he had to go out on the internet and doing if I was told I needed administrator privileges to do and everything came out. So I don't think that 2 patches have been installed. First of all, I think, because he was such a company computer I should get administrator privileges to use this tool and install the updates.  But to do that I have to access this tool once more when I get administrator privileges and I have no idea how to access this tool once more - where is?  The help file have been without help. I went to the download area NOR and tried these patches and or the other could not be found!

  Start-> all programs-> National Instruments-> NI Update Service.

  Location on disk: C:\Program NIUninstaller Instruments\Shared\Update Service. (if on change "Program Files (x 86)' 64 - bit)

• Cannot install hotfix

  Fix pwd does not have to unpack the hotfix.  I asked 4 times and tried manually and copy/paste.  This is for the 64-bit patch.  I can download and unzip the x 86 patch successfully, but I don't need that one (just a validation test).

  I can't respond to the e-mail and I can't contact support because MSFT wants to charge for support.  I want just a password that works for the 64-bit hotfix or a contact person.  It's pretty ridiculous that there is no QA around that.

  -AJ

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/982927

  Package:

  -----------------------------------------------------------
  The KB Article number: 982927
  Language: All (Global)
  Platform: x 64
  Location: (http://hotfixv4.microsoft.com/Windows%207/WindowsServer%202008%20R2/sp1/Fix316593/7600/free/412921_intl_x64_zip.exe)
  Password: *va@3BKm

  Hello

  I installed the fix even on my system and that has worked well for me.

  I suggest ask you the Microsoft hotfix (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982927) and download the Zip file on your system and then copy paste the password provided by Microsoft and check out the files and install on the system.

  This part of the message is included in the e-mail you receive from * address email is removed from the privacy *

  Note: Passwords are set to expire all the seven days. Download the package in the next seven days to ensure that you can extract the files. If there is less than seven days left in the cycle of change of password when you receive this e-mail message, you receive two passwords. If this is the case, use the first password if you download the hotfix package before the date in the field ' password changes on "which is listed in the table at the end of this e-mail message. Use the second password if you download the hotfix package from the date in the field ' password changes on.

  Thanks and regards.

  Thahaseena M
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer.
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• E709a printer is no longer on the network

  Have had my printer/fax E709a installed with computers able to use from the network.  It is plugged into a wired router / wireless with Verizon FIOS.  Operating system on the computer connected to ethernet Wired is Windows 7 (64-bit) and Ubuntu Linux (via VMWare).  Other Windows XP computers and, for awhile, I had a very old Dell Ubuntu use via wired ethernet.

  Recently, however, we had a power outage extended (about 40 hours) and it seems that, since I can't find the printer on the network.  I was able to run via the USB port on the bridge, but it would be nice if we can get it on the network again.

  So far, I have tried... (with McAfee firewall off)

  Network HP 64 bit patch

  The diagnosis of HP's utility

  Remove and reinstall the printer drivers

  Print a "Configuration Page of HP network" and tying to access the IP address via my web browser (expires)

  Open a command prompt window and trying to ping IP address of the printer (not responding)

  Restart the printer by turning off and turn back while now #6

  I'm out of ideas and I was wondering if maybe the power failure did something?

  The power failure (or reboot to be able to introduce a voltage surge) may have blown the power supply.  Let's reset - unplug it from the wall and from the printer for 5 minutes and then try again.

• Unable to Boot PeopleSoft area (PIA)-> CMDTUX_CAT:827: ERROR: fatal error occurred; launch the user error handler

  As I start my custom domain name (HC92), I get the following:
  

  exec PSWATCHSRV EI o '.\LOGS\stdout' '.\LOGS\stderr' - A - ID - 54217 d TESTSERV s PSWATCHSRV: process id = 1636... Has begun.

  exec PSAPPSRV '.\LOGS\stdout' EI '.\LOGS\stderr'[email protected] s PSAPPSRV d o: process id = 2656... Has begun.

  exec PSAPPSRV '.\LOGS\stdout' EI '.\LOGS\stderr'[email protected] s PSAPPSRV d o: process id = 2644... Has begun.

  exec PSSAMSRV o '.\LOGS\stdout"e".\LOGS\stderr"- A – d s PSSAMSRV TESTSERV: process id = 2832... Has begun.

  exec PSSAMSRV o '.\LOGS\stdout"e".\LOGS\stderr"- A – d s PSSAMSRV TESTSERV: process id = 2692... Has begun.

  exec PSANALYTICSRV o '.\LOGS\stdout"e".\LOGS\stderr"- A – d s PSANALYTICSRV TESTSERV: process id = 2448... Has begun.

  exec PSANALYTICSRV o '.\LOGS\stdout"e".\LOGS\stderr"- A – d s PSANALYTICSRV TESTSERV: process id = 496... Has begun.

  exec PSANALYTICSRV o '.\LOGS\stdout"e".\LOGS\stderr"- A – d s PSANALYTICSRV TESTSERV: process id = 2964... Has begun.

  exec PSRENSRV o '.\LOGS\stdout"e".\LOGS\stderr"- A – d s PSRENSRV TESTSERV: process id 2356 =... Has begun.

  exec PSMONITORSRV EI o '.\LOGS\stdout' '.\LOGS\stderr' - A - ID - 54217 d TESTSERV s PSMONITORSRV: process id = 1056... Has begun.

  exec JSL o '.\LOGS\stdout"e".\LOGS\stderr"- A – n //PSOFT_PC:9000 m 5 - M7-I have 5-j ANY - x 40 s 10 - c 1000000 w JSH: failed.

  tmboot: CMDTUX_CAT:827: ERROR: fatal error occurred; launch the user error handler

  tmshutdown - qy

  ==============ERROR!================

  Try to start met domain errors! See TUXEDO log for more details.

  ==============ERROR!================

  ----------------------------

  Domain LOG FILE

  ----------------------------

  PSADMIN.1088 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:34.774] (0) attempt to Begin priming on domain HC92

  PSAPPSRV.2656 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:46.056] (0) PeopleTools version 8.54 (Windows) from. Tuxedo server is APPSRV 99/2

  PSAPPSRV.2656 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:46.056] (3) detected time zone is Pacific SA Daylight saving time

  PSAPPSRV.2656 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:46.134] (0) used Cache Directory: C:\PS _CFG_HOME\appserv\HC92\CACHE\PSAPPSRV_2\

  PSAPPSRV.2656 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:47.056] (2) App Server host lag is DB + 0 0:00:00 (ORACLE PSHRDMO)

  PSAPPSRV.2656 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:51.196] (0) server started

  
  

  PSAPPSRV.2644 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:51.603] (0) PeopleTools version 8.54 (Windows) from. Tuxedo server is APPSRV 99/1

  PSAPPSRV.2644 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:51.603] (3) detected time zone is Pacific SA Daylight saving time

  PSAPPSRV.2644 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:51.665] (0) used Cache Directory: C:\PS _CFG_HOME\appserv\HC92\CACHE\PSAPPSRV_1\

  PSAPPSRV.2644 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:51.837] (2) App Server host lag is DB + 0 0:00:00 (ORACLE PSHRDMO)

  PSAPPSRV.2644 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:52.415] (0) server started

  
  

  PSSAMSRV.2832 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:52.728] (0) PeopleTools version 8.54 (Windows) from. Tuxedo server is APPSRV 99/101

  PSSAMSRV.2832 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:52.728] (3) detected time zone is Pacific SA Daylight saving time

  PSSAMSRV.2832 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:52.790] (0) used Cache Directory: C:\PS _CFG_HOME\appserv\HC92\CACHE\PSSAMSRV_101\

  PSSAMSRV.2832 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:53.087] (0) server started

  
  

  PSSAMSRV.2692 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:53.415] (0) PeopleTools version 8.54 (Windows) from. Tuxedo server is APPSRV 99/100

  PSSAMSRV.2692 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:53.415] (3) detected time zone is Pacific SA Daylight saving time

  PSSAMSRV.2692 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:53.493] (0) used Cache Directory: C:\PS _CFG_HOME\appserv\HC92\CACHE\PSSAMSRV_100\

  PSSAMSRV.2692 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:53.806] (0) server started

  
  

  PSRENSRV.2356 [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:56.743] (0) st PeopleTools version 8.54 (Windows) arting . Tuxedo server is RENGRP 92/101

  PSRENSRV.2356 [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:56.759] (3) switch to the new log file * C:\PS_CFG_H OME\appserv\HC92\LOGS\PSRENSRV_0113.LOG *

  
  

  PSADMIN.1088 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 07:13.698] (0) attempt to end HC92 field boot

  * C:\PS_CFG_HOME\appserv\HC92\LOGS\PSRENSRV_0113.LOG *.

  -Begin PSRENSRV boot-

  PSRENSRV.2356 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:57.273] (3) (NET.113): RenRequest customer service request succeeded

  PSRENSRV.2356 (0) [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 06:57.843] (3) (NET.113): RenRequest customer service request succeeded

  2356.2708 [2015-01 - 13 T 17: 07:02.075] (WARN) nsmain: off the server immediately asked

  ----------------------------

  SMOKING LOG FILE

  ----------------------------

  170634.PSOFT_PC! PSADMIN.1088: Start the start on domain HC92 attempt

  170639.PSOFT_PC! tmadmin.556.2400.-2: TMADMIN_CAT:1330: INFO: command: start - a

  170641.PSOFT_PC! tmboot.2392.2544.-2: 13/01/2015: Tuxedo Version 12.1.3.0.0_VS201 0, 64-bit

  170641.PSOFT_PC! tmboot.2392.2544.-2: CMDTUX_CAT:1851: INFO: TM_BOOTTIMEOUT is to t to 120 seconds

  170641.PSOFT_PC! tmboot.2392.2544.-2: CMDTUX_CAT:1855: INFO: TM_BOOTPRESUMEDFAIL option is selected

  
  

  170643.PSOFT_PC! BBL.2340.1680.0: 13/01/2015: Version Tuxedo 12.1.3.0.0_VS2010, 64-bit, Patch level (none)

  170643.PSOFT_PC! BBL.2340.1680.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard master boot

  
  

  170645.PSOFT_PC! tmboot.1488.2464.-2: 13/01/2015: Tuxedo Version 12.1.3.0.0_VS201 0, 64-bit

  170645.PSOFT_PC! tmboot.1488.2464.-2: CMDTUX_CAT:1851: INFO: TM_BOOTTIMEOUT is to t to 120 seconds

  170645.PSOFT_PC! tmboot.1488.2464.-2: CMDTUX_CAT:1855: INFO: TM_BOOTPRESUMEDFAIL option is selected

  
  

  170645.PSOFT_PC! PSWATCHSRV.1636.2816.-2: 13/01/2015: Version Tuxedo 12.1.3.0.0_VS2010, 64-bit

  170645.PSOFT_PC! PSWATCHSRV.1636.2816-2: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard main starting

  
  

  170645.PSOFT_PC! PSAPPSRV.2656.592.0: 13/01/2015: Version Tuxedo 12.1.3.0.0_VS2010, 64-bit

  170645.PSOFT_PC! PSAPPSRV.2656.592.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard main starting

  170651.PSOFT_PC! PSAPPSRV.2644.2804.0: 13/01/2015: Version Tuxedo 12.1.3.0.0_VS2010, 64-bit

  170651.PSOFT_PC! PSAPPSRV.2644.2804.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: main starti Standardng

  170652.PSOFT_PC! PSSAMSRV.2832.2208.0: 13/01/2015: Version Tuxedo 12.1.3.0.0_VS2010, 64-bit

  170652.PSOFT_PC! PSSAMSRV.2832.2208.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: main starti Standardng

  170653.PSOFT_PC! PSSAMSRV.2692.2668.0: 13/01/2015: Version Tuxedo 12.1.3.0.0_VS2010, 64-bit

  170653.PSOFT_PC! PSSAMSRV.2692.2668.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: main starti Standardng

  
  

  170653.PSOFT_PC! PSANALYTICSRV.2448.2180.0: 13/01/2015: Tuxedo Version 12.1.3.0.0_VS2010, 64-bit

  170653.PSOFT_PC! PSANALYTICSRV.2448.2180.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: main s Standardtarting

  170654.PSOFT_PC! PSANALYTICSRV.496.2476.0: 13/01/2015: Tuxedo Version 12.1.3.0.0_VS2010, 64-bit

  170654.PSOFT_PC! PSANALYTICSRV.496.2476.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard main stsurglace

  170655.PSOFT_PC! PSANALYTICSRV.2964.1536.0: 13/01/2015: Tuxedo Version 12.1.3.0.0_VS2010, 64-bit

  170655.PSOFT_PC! PSANALYTICSRV.2964.1536.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: main s Standardtarting

  
  

  170656.PSOFT_PC! PSRENSRV.2356.2708.-2: 13/01/2015: Version Tuxedo 12.1.3.0.0_VS2010, 64-bit

  170656.PSOFT_PC! PSRENSRV.2356.2708-2: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: key start Standarding

  
  

  170658.PSOFT_PC! PSMONITORSRV.1056.2212.-2: 13/01/2015: Tuxedo Version 12.1.3.0.0_VS2010, 64-bit

  170658.PSOFT_PC! PSMONITORSRV.1056.2212-2: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: main s Standardtarting

  
  

  170658.PSOFT_PC! JSL.640.904.0: 13/01/2015: Version Tuxedo 12.1.3.0.0_VS2010, 64 -bit

  170658.PSOFT_PC! JSL.640.904.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard master boot

  170658.PSOFT_PC! JSL.640.904.0: INFO: version JOLT Jolt 12.1.1.0 Oracle Listener

  170659.PSOFT_PC! JSL.640.904.0: JOLT_CAT:1568: "INFO: threshold of Compression is tot-1000000 '

  170659.PSOFT_PC! JSL.640.904.0: JOLT_CAT:1242: ' ERROR: Bad Internet type listning address provided: //PSOFT_PC:9000 '

  170659.PSOFT_PC! JSL.640.904.0: LIBTUX_CAT:250: ERROR: tpsvrinit() failed

  
  

  170659.PSOFT_PC! tmboot.1488.2464.-2: CMDTUX_CAT:825: ERROR: process to PSOFT JSL _Pc failed with / t tperrno (TPESYSTEM - internal system error)

  170659.PSOFT_PC! tmboot.1488.2464.-2: tmboot: CMDTUX_CAT:827: ERROR: fatal error met, launch the user error handler

  
  

  170710.PSOFT_PC! BBL.2340.1680.0: CMDTUX_CAT:26: INFO: The BBL out of system

  
  

  170713.PSOFT_PC! PSADMIN.1088End attempt to boot on domain HC92

  -------------------------------------------------------------

  SETTINGS FOR THE DOMAIN

  ------------------------------------------------------------

  ----------------------------------------------

  Menu quick access - configure area: HC92

  ----------------------------------------------

  Characteristic parameters

  ==========                                 ==========

  (1) pub/Sub servers: No. 17) DBNAME: [PSHRDMO]

  (Server 2) Quick: No. 18) DBTYPE: [ORACLE]

  (Query servers 3): No. 19) user name: [PS]

  ((4) shock: Yes 20) UserPswd: [PS]

  ((5) Jolt relay: No. 21) Networkid: [TESTSERV]

  ((6) WSL: No. 22) AddToPATH: [C:\app\psoft\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1\BIN]

  (PC 7 debugger): No. 23) ConnectID: [people]

  (Event notification 8): Yes 24) ConnectPswd: [people]

  [(Serveurs de 9) MCF: No. 25) DomainConnectPswd:]

  (10 assembler) Perf: No. 26) Port of WSL: [7000]

  ((11) Analytics servers: Yes 27) JSL Port: [9000]

  (Bridge 12) areas: No. 28) Port of JRAD: [9100]

  (13) the server events: No.

  Actions

  =========

  (14) load config as shown

  (15) custom configuration

  (16) the settings of the environment

  (h) aid for this menu

  (q) to return to the previous menu

  TIP: Enter 17 to change DBNAME, then 14 to load

  Enter the selection (1-28, h or q):

  --------------------------------------------------------------

  ENVIRONMENT SETTINGS

  --------------------------------------------------------------

  C:\Users\psoft > set

  ALLUSERSPROFILE = C:\programdata

  APPDATA = C:\Users\psoft\AppData\Roaming

  CommonProgramFiles = c: files

  CommonProgramFiles (x 86) = c: Program Files (x 86) \Common Files

  CommonProgramW6432 = c: files

  COMPUTERNAME = PSOFT_PC

  ComSpec=C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe

  FP_NO_HOST_CHECK = NO

  HOMEDRIVE = C:

  HOMEPATH = \Users\psoft

  JAVA_HOME = C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_25

  JAVA_OPTS = "" - Dcom.sun.xml.namespace.QName.useCompatibleSerialVersionUID = 1.0 - Xms32 m - Xmx64m " "

  LOCALAPPDATA = C:\Users\psoft\AppData\Local

  LOGONSERVER = \\PSOFT_PC

  NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS = 2

  OS = Windows_NT

  Path = C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_25\bin

  ; C:\app\psoft\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1\bin

  ; C:\app\psoft\product\11.2.0\dbhome_2\bin

  ; C:\Windows\System32; C:\Windows

  ; C:\windows\System32\Wbem

  ; C:\Windows\system32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\

  ; C:\app\tuxedo\tuxedo12.1.3.0.0_VS2010\bin

  ; C:\app\tuxedo\tuxedo12.1.3.0.0_VS2010\jre\bin\server

  ; C:\app\tuxedo\tuxedo12.1.3.0.0_VS2010\jre\bin

  PATHEXT = .COM; EXE;. BEATS;. CMD;. VBS;. VBE;. JS;. JSE;. WSF;. WSH;. MSC

  PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE = AMD64

  PROCESSOR_IDENTIFIER = Intel64 family 6 model 58 Stepping 9 GenuineIntel

  PROCESSOR_LEVEL = 6

  PROCESSOR_REVISION = 3 a 09

  ProgramData = ProgramData

  ProgramFiles = c: Program Files

  ProgramFiles (x 86) = c: Program Files (x 86)

  ProgramW6432 = C:\Program Files

  PROMPT = $P$ G

  PSModulePath=C:\Windows\system32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\Modules\

  PS_APP_HOME = C:\HC9.2

  PS_CFG_HOME = C:\PS_CFG_HOME

  PS_HOME = C:\PT8.54

  PUBLIC = C:\Users\Public

  SESSION = Console

  SystemDrive = C:

  SystemRoot = C:\Windows

  TEMP = C:\Users\psoft\AppData\Local\Temp

  TMP = C:\Users\psoft\AppData\Local\Temp

  TUXDIR=C:\app\tuxedo\tuxedo12.1.3.0.0_VS2010

  USERDOMAIN = PSOFT_PC

  USERNAME = psoft

  USERPROFILE = C:\Users\psoft

  windir = C:\Windows

  windows_tracing_flags = 3

  windows_tracing_logfile=C:\BVTBin\Tests\installpackage\csilogfile.log

  _JAVA_OPTIONS =-Xmx512M

  Found this post:

  ISNAT_CAT:1242: ERROR: Bad Internet type of listening address

  "The problem has been resolved after that I changed my name from ZEMEROV_A to ZEMEROV computer.

  Hyphens are not allowed for regular internet names. The only Microsoft DNS server

  allows hyphens. Obviously TUXEDO checks the internal Web address syntax.

  But I don't know why my IP (10.57.70.246) has failed.

  In any case, the issue is resolved. Make sure that TUXEDO documentation recommends-

  When using the name of the server host you talk server. This is case and sensitive syntax. »

  Where as: I changed my host name of psoft_pc to psoftpc and I changed the same on TNSNAMES and everything worked without problems.

  I'll mark this issue is resolved.

  Thank you.

• Question of compatibility/coexistence ORACLE TUXEDO

  Our existing PeopleSoft environment
  UNIX AIX 6.1

  PS HRMS tools Application 8.5 9.1

  PS Finance tools 8.51 Application 9.1

  We are about to upgrade only the HRMS

  PS HRMS tools 8.5 Application 9.1to PS
  Application tools 8.54 HCM 9.2

  Question-

  1 will be new ORACLE TUXEDO 12cR1 (12.1.1.0) work with PS Finance tools 8.51

  2. can you Oracle Tuxedo, Version (10.3.0.0, 64-bit, Patch level 081 - for end of PS) coexist with ORACLE TUXEDO 12cR1 (12.1.1.0,64 bits)?

  Hello

  For question 12cR1 PeopleSoft and Tuxedo, you will need to check with the PeopleSoft team as I do not know their version dependencies.

  When you ask can coexist Tuxedo 10 and 12, the answer is Yes, although I don't know exactly what you mean by coexist.  They can be in the same field of MP, or in distinct areas linked through the gateway of the field.  If they are in the same domain, then the MASTER machine must be one who executes the later version of Tuxedo.

  Kind regards

  Todd little

  Chief Architect of Oracle Tuxedo

• Huge performance in managed with InitialLOBFetchSize-1 provider problem?

  Hello

  I'm testing the fully managed ODP.NET and noticed a performance problem serious if I set the property OracleCommand.InitialLOBFetchSize - 1.

  Is the result of a small test program that runs just "select * from table where rownum < = 5000 ' on a table with 20 columns where 7 of these columns are CLOB with different values for InitialLOBFetchSize:

  Native with 0: 11.277 s

  Managed with 0: 10.357 s

  Native with 5120: 5.182 s (1.235 s if the OracleCommand.FetchSize is increased to 1 MB)
  

  Managed with 5120: 0.568 s

  Native with - 1: 0.156 s

  Managed with-1: 122.416 s

  (Note: with "natives", I mean the only partly managed ODP.NET.)

  These results are completely reproducible with only minor differences. The OracleCommand.FetchSize property seems only to have a significant effect on the native provider and again only for positive values of InitialLOBFetchSize.

  It's very nice that the managed provider is faster with an initial size of extraction 5KO LOB, but what is the problem with-1? Can someone explain this? Maybe a bug?

  With the help of a performance profiler I see that all this time is used in OracleDataReader.Read () waiting for a network operation to complete (no CPU usage): screenshot

  Server: Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit Production

  Native client: 11.2.0.3 32-bit Patch 22

  Managed client: 4.121.1.0 nuget (I know that this is not an official source, but I don't want to download the full client just for Assembly of 6 MB)

  Application console .NET 4.0 x 86

  Yes, the solution is in ODAC 12 c R2. Field "Corrected Version" of bugs contains the next major version or the Group of hotfixes in that the fix will appear.

  It's possible corrections appear earlier, as in the next ODAC, Oracle patch or one-time fix. Usually, this is followed in the field of related bugs. In bug 17263955, you'll see a related bug 17709236 indicated. Bug 17709236 indicates a backport has been done for the ODAC next release.