The 64-bit patch is ready for 12 Director? If we cannot publish to IOS?

The 64-bit patch is ready for 12 Director? If we cannot publish to IOS?

Thank you

Hello Javier,

I just sent you

The answer is YES

RJ and I have recently released iOS educational apps built with the Director.

If anyone needs this fix 64 bit D12 iOS - private message me please.

(PS - I highly recommend buying otto 'RJ' with all the xtras added iOS - like video)

Tags: Director

Similar Questions

  • HP Envy 5534: Need help to find the 32-bit drivers - Win7 - basis for HP Envy 5534

    Please see above, I'm unable to locate the drivers necessary 32 bit for my HP Envy 5534.

    I need to use the base without the supplied software drivers and I have a 32-bit system.

    A permit would be appreciated

    Thank you.

    Hi @BrokenOranges

    Thanks for your comments.

    If you scroll down and click on the base drivers, it must put the 32-bit driver (as shown). Click on download 32-Bit for the base driver.

    Hope that helps!

  • Should I expect the 64-bit version of 32bitor for my Windows 7 Ultimate? I have a Quad Core CPU.

    32 bit 64 bit. Windows 7 Ultimate. Quad Core Samsung.

    In general, it is preferable to use the 64-bit version, unless there are some very special reasons of not (for example, a critical piece of hardware that offers only one driver 32-bit).   He runs the 32-bit software and also allow the possibility of using 64-bit programs.  The 64-bit version can support more RAM and provides a path for growth in the longer term.

  • The package of creative cloud ready for simultaneous user on VDI puts (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure)

    I would like to know if Adobe Creative Cloud package is ready for the concurrent users on VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) environment?

    Good response in my College email. Thank you!

    [email protected]

    Cloud license allows 2 activations http://www.adobe.com/legal/licenses-terms.html

    -Install on a 2nd computer http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1452292?tstart=0

    -https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/help/sign-in-out-activate-apps.html

    -Windows or Mac has no importance... 2 on the same operating system or 1 on each

    -Two activations on one account CAN NOT be used at the same time (to be noted in the link above of the license)

    -An individual account is for one person and may not be shared with anyone else

  • What is the best bit rate to use for files WMV to DVD?

    I shoot with a low point and shoot digital camera.  I take the files AVI-video from the camera, which are quite large, and edit them in Windows Live Movie Maker 2011 and then save them as WMV files that are typically much smaller.  I like to create DVDs with better videos using Windows DVD creation or another program video.  My question is what bit rate to specify when I publish the films completed as WMV files?

    My camera AVI files can be played in Windows Media Player.  They have little of rates which vary from about 3 Mbit/s to a little more than 5 Mbps.  Is STANDARD DEFINITION 640 x 480 VGA quality video.

    Movie Maker default bitrate for the option "burn to DVD" is 2.99 MB/s.  I do not notice a difference in quality between the 2 MB/s I usually use and.  (I chose 2 Mbps, because in the past, I've used Windows Media Encoder and it defines "DVD quality" like 1-2 Mbps transmission speed and quality "HD" as 5 Mbps.)  Bit rates below 1 Mbps up to 500 Kbps have been defined as "Quality VHS" and below which has been 'QVGA quality'.

    With important videos, I publish movies with a flow rate of 5 Mbps.  Default speed of movie Maker for videos "to be played on my computer" is 7.69 Mbps, but it's more than the AVI from the camera, then how is this possible?  How can save the file with a bit rate higher than the bit rate of the input file?

    Is another experiment, a good way to decide on the rate of good bit for my projects?

    Hello

    Thanks for joining us out on Microsoft Community Forums. I understand that you want to know the best bitrate for video files Windows media burn on DVD.

    I suggest you check out the link to check the bit rate and resolution.

    The movie settings: frequently asked questions.

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-in/Windows-Vista/movie-settings-frequently-asked-questions

    Refer to this video file formats can I choose to publish my movie in windows movie maker? The link above.

    If you face problems more while working with Windows Mail on Microsoft Community Forums, we will be happy to help you.

    Thank you.

  • Satellite M70 - the SD card slot is ready for HD

    Hello

    The card slot SD of my Satellite M70 is HD ready?

    Best regards

    Guenni

    Hello

    Unfortunately I put t know what you mean by HD ready?

    Do you have you take a look at the user manual and have sought details of SD card slot?

  • How to increase the default bit rate/band width for movi calls?

    Hi, Expert

    As the subject, don't know which is the default configuration, but the movi calls to each other in the LAN can reach only 352 * 288, with bitirate set up 314 kb/s in statistics during the call

    See picture below:

    Hi, I've tested this in our lab as soon as possible and the call flow is Jabber--> VCS - C--> C40 endpoint. Please see the model snpshot TMS Jabber, VCS - C parameters of bandwidth, connected calls rate details on C40.

    As stated previously, the bandwidth of Jabber for iPad has been limited to 384 Kbps maximum since that's all the current iPad hardware is capable.

  • The currently assosiated site is not available with this user [was: cannot publish changes to the Business Catalyst site without creating a new site]

    I've just updated Adobe Muse at 2015.2.  After the upgrade, I can publish is more updates/changes to the site already launched with the catalyst for business without creating a whole new site and delete the previous one every time.  The dialog box gives the error "currently associated site is not available for this user."  The journal for my business catalyst, the credentials are correct, because when you go on the Site of the Business Catalyst manage it connects to the admin home page.  Is there a setting that has changed with the new version.  I use a Mac Book Pro with OS 10.11.5 retina

    Post edited by: Catherine Rollet

    Hello dragoness13,

    Here's an update on this issue.

    Reason: Following an internal problem, association of account user of Muse and the corresponding user BC account breaks after Muse put 2015.2 to date. It is originally Muse to do not be able to enumerate the users existing sites BC to publish to the dialog Business Catalyst. The issue is addressed in Muse engineering team. Meanwhile, use the workflow as shown below.

    Solution/solution:

    1. Create a new site from Muse
    2. Publish it as a new trial to Business Catalyst site
    3. Close and reopen the Muse
    4. Open the affected site of Muse
    5. Publish on Business Catalyst now

    Try this and let me know if it works for you.

    Thank you

    Ankush

  • Method to check the VISA resources is ready for writing.

    Dear Forum, I have a piece of equipment that I connect to LabView via serial. The companion of the Instrument is of course completely useless, which fails for inexplicable reasons, but everything works perfectly in hyperterminal.

    When I try to adapt the example "basic series write and Read.vi" at my request, the implementation is very simple. However, it does not work despite working in hyperterminal. After a bit of investigation, I have determined that the problem is that after "VISA set up Serial Port" port is not * actually * available for writing quite yet, most likely because it is a very old computer.

    By inserting a delay between the "VISA set up Serial Port" and the "VISA Write" I am able to get the program works as expected 100% of the time. However, it is a very bad solution, because this long delay can be totally useless and performance on the computer to an end user (which may be much better than this one). Especially because this piece of equipment has 8 analog inputs, 8 analog outputs, 4 relay, 20 outputs 24VDC, 8 DIOs and 3 ports RS232 passthrough so it communicates a lot of data.

    Is there a function I can use to * guarantee * that the COM port is really ready for writing? If I could do this, then it can return almost immediately on a fast computer, while leaving enough time for computers slower finish opening the port. It may well be something that happens on the side of the pilot of the command windows open port.

    It comes to LabView 8.20 running on a Windows XP in VirtualBox on Linux host. Please don't just tell me that I shouldn't use virtualized Windows, I am sure that this problem occurs for the disabled of old material as well as it is the only significant in terms of series API difference. The virtualized instance is only likely to be more slow material dealing with than it would be otherwise.

    You can get information on the creation of an Instrument Driver Networkdriver.

    If your instrument does not return an ID and you can not do a reset, then obviously your initialize function would not code for this. Having the code that defines the instrument on certain default configuration is common.

    I don't know how this driver is intended to be used. Do you want that he NOR certified. The driver needs to be distributed outside of your company? It seems that the problem with your com port is unique to your pc and the installation program. How many times this would appear to other users?

  • 10g Release 2 Patch Set 1 for windows 2003 32-bit

    Hello. I'm going to find of the trouble the * 10.2.0.3 Patch Set 1 * for 10g R2 for Win2003 32 bit on metalink. I found 2 that is 5337014all to the right but none Patch Set 1 set of patches.
    No one knows the number of patch from Metalink for Patch Set 1 so I could do a quick search?
    Thank you!!!

    Published by: avtandil on October 16, 2008 09:00

    Then you have the wrong spec, patch 1 is 10.2.0.2, patch 2 is 10.2.0.3, patch 3 is 10.2.04, see Note: 316900.1 ALERT: Oracle 10 g Release 2 (10.2) Support Status and alerts

    Enrique

  • 32-bit patch

    Hi all, I have a doubt, I hope someone can help me.

    I need to install the patches, 8217898, 8360498 in R11i EBS (11.5.10). It is runing on AIX 5.3. Database 10.2.0.4.

    These patches in metalink are 32-bit, but my platform is 64-bit, and it is not included as a platform for patch.

    Can I install the patch of 32 bits in the 64-bit platform?

    Thank you very much if anyone can help me.

    Hello

    Can I install the patch of 32 bits in the 64-bit platform?

    Search for the 64-bit patch first, if you can find download the patch and apply it. If the 64-bit patch does not exist then go with the 32-bit patch.

    Thank you
    Hussein

  • Where can I download the version of Firefox 64 b for Windows 7?

    Missing at Mozilla.org is their old "Downloads" section, where the different versions of Firefox are available for their operating system.

    I'm looking for a browser Firefox 64 b that is compatible with Windows 64 b. operating systems is there such a version? DRM for your help.

    For Linux, 64-bit was necessary as otherwise the user will have to install the required 32-bit libraries, he built themselves or use a package of 64-bit of the third of their Linux distro.

    There was also a lot of practice with the versions of Linux 64 - bit for some time on channel every night before the release of Firefox 4.0 even has emerged and they have mainly been used to catch the break since it is possible to break the 64-bit without affecting the 32-bit time.

    For Mac, it had and by supporting 64-bit from Firefox 4.0, this is one of the reasons for the abandonment of PPC support.

    Also when there is Firefox Win64 versions one will need Windows 7, 8.x or newer as servers, Vista, and XP 64-bit only is not supported.

  • 64-bit Windows 7 driver for Atheros AR5007 in dv7-1468nr

    I have been in communication with Microsoft and HP technical support both on this issue.

    Can we please have a time frame on how long before that we will have a driver for the wireless card that is in this model the actual 64-bit?

    I don't want to sound rude here, but Acer has been much easier to get around the problem of driver for windows 7.

    Microsoft did confirm this evening that there is no 64-bit for this AR5007 driver and back to HP.

    Atheros seems to deal specifically with suppliers more with the support of its prodiucts, as it is my return to HP after six years of absence and the fact that my company is jumping through the hoops for the HP partnership, I would like an honest answer from an employee of HP.

    How long before that this driver is available in 64 bits?

    Until that time, all of the product is worthless for me as a professional and as a student for the simple reason that when you try to use a suppliant of security required for authentication, the network manager crash when using the measure of 802. 1 x. Microsoft has identified that specifically a driver related issue because there is no driver 64-bit available.

    Not to play against each other here, but in my profession and in my studies, I tend to promote these products that seem to work better and where assistance is available. The Acer also contained an Atheros card, but it was changed to use a broadcom driver in Windows 7. No idea why or how, I know that it works and it supports the Cisco PEAP supplicant, which is an important issue with the dv7-1468nr and Windows 7 with the Atheros AR5007 wireless device.

    Other related driver issues such as the multimedia remote that might be expected given that windows 7 has not officially released, but when I contacted support on the card reader does not not (another feature that works out of the box on an Acer hardware), I was told basically sorry charlie, good luck. Fortunately, I was able to locate an XP driver for the card reader works. The media remote is a trivial question, but the wireless is a serious problem. If it cannot be resolved within a reasonable time, I fear I will be boxing it up to return to where it was purchased, as defective. the deployment is in a few days...

    lets hope that we can really appropriate at this time that drivers.

    After three long sessions with Microsoft and a few sessions where I was not very tolerable with the "apology" given for drivers not made available via the website of HP, I was able to refine the exact question to something other than a real driver file.

    If the question was not in fact the driver file, it does not change the fact that HP should provide drivers on their website that they will BE supported for all operating systems promoted regardless of the version (Home Basic, premium, professional, ultimate, etc..). It became a problem in my final conversation of a HP technician before they gave me a link to a driver file real 64 bit, of course claim immunity from liability for any damage as a result of the application. The link of this driver is here.

    Now for the real root of the problem.

    On the new installation, there are several devices that have remained unknown in Device Manager.

    Day after day, a lesbianism HP drivers and applications to solve problems.

    What was actually the connection magaer crash on trying to manually create a connection by using the Cisco's PEAP Protocol was a corrupt application of Cisco installation. Through the process of trying to repair the installation and actually manually change the registry and remove all traces of the application with Microsoft in the remote session, it was determined that the system had become corrupt and need a fresh 'custom' install.

    After installation, using all the HP and Microsoft drivers only, (no application of third party still installed) I have successfully install the 64-bit application Cisco PEAP for 64-bit Vista and create the connection which is required.

    To date, there is only one problem with this laptop and I expect a fix from HP for it in the coming days.

    The HP MediaSmart application for this machine special 64-bit is always just a touch unstable running Windows 7 Professional.

    I hope that it can save someone else the days of frustration I endured everything in trying to solve this problem.

  • When I scan for Windows Vista Service Pack update (published 4/2009) comes in,

    I redid my computer a few months ago restore to factory settings and restore my files from a backup disk. Everything seemed to work properly.  A few weeks ago a full scan found a worm & some virus which I removed. Now, I have a problem with the updates. When I scan for Windows Vista Service Pack update (published 4/2009) arrives.  When I click to install it, it is saying it is correctly installed (in 30 seconds) and yet he continues to come when I'm scanning for updates.    Should I restore settings again?  After looking for info on the forums of windows, I did the System File Checker to check corrupt files.  Several corrupted files appear in the details of the SFC.  But their fixation is "over my head".   I glued the SFC details below. Any help would be appreciated.  Thank you

    2012-09-04 11:51:44, info CSI 00000006 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:51:44, transaction Info CSI 00000007 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:51:47, info CSI 00000009 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:51:48, CSI of information 0000000 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:51:48, CSI Info 0000000b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:51:53, CSI to 0000000 d [SR] full audit information
    2012-09-04 11:51:53, CSI 0000000e Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:51:53, CSI Info 0000000f transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:51:55, info CSI 00000011 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:51:56, info CSI 00000012 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:51:56, transaction Info CSI 00000013 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:51:57, info CSI 00000015 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:51:57, info CSI 00000016 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:51:57, Info CSI 00000017 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:51:59, info CSI 00000019 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:51:59, CSI Info 0000001 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:51:59, CSI Info 0000001 b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:01, CSI Info 0000001 d [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:52:01, 0000001e Info [SR] CSI components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:01, CSI Info 0000001f transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:03, info CSI 00000021 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:52:03, info CSI 00000022 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:03, transaction Info CSI 00000023 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:04, info CSI 00000025 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:52:05, info CSI 00000026 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:05, the transaction Info CSI 00000027 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:06, info CSI 00000029 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:52:07, CSI Info 0000002 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:07, CSI Info 0000002b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:09, info CSI 0000002d [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:52:09, CSI [SR] 0000002e Info components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:09, CSI Info 0000002f transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:11, info CSI 00000031 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:52:12, info CSI 00000032 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:12, transaction Info CSI 00000033 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:13, info CSI 00000035 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:52:14, info CSI 00000036 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:14, transaction Info CSI 00000037 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:15, Info CSI 00000039 [SR] check complete
    2012-09-04 11:52:16, CSI Info 0000003 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:16, CSI Info 0000003b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:19, info CSI 0000003d [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:52:19, CSI 0000003e [SR] Info components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:19, CSI Info 0000003f transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:24, info CSI 00000041 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:52:24, info CSI 00000042 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:24, transaction Info CSI 00000043 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:29, info CSI 00000046 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:52:29, info CSI 00000047 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:29, transaction Info CSI 00000048 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:33, CSI Info 0000004a Verify [SR] full
    2012-09-04 11:52:34, CSI Info 0000004 components [SR] b check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:34, CSI Info 0000004 c [SR] beginning verify and repair operation
    2012-09-04 11:52:37, CSI 0000004f [SR] Verify Info full
    2012-09-04 11:52:38, info CSI 00000050 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:38, Info CSI 00000051 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:43, info CSI 00000053 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:52:43, info CSI 00000054 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:43, transaction Info CSI 00000055 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:51, CSI 0000005f [SR] Verify Info full
    2012-09-04 11:52:51, info CSI 00000060 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:51, transaction Info CSI 00000061 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:52:55, info CSI 00000063 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:52:56, info CSI 00000064 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:52:56, transaction Info CSI 00000065 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:53, info CSI 00000067 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:53, info CSI 00000068 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:53, transaction Info CSI 00000069 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:53:05, CSI Info 0000006b Verify [SR] full
    2012-09-04 11:53:06, components of CSI Info 0000006 c [SR] 100 audit (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:53:06, CSI Info 0000006 d [SR] beginning verify and repair transaction
    2012-09-04 11:53:14, CSI Info 0000006f Verify [SR] full
    2012-09-04 11:53:15, info CSI 00000070 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:53:15, transaction Info CSI 00000071 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:53:24, Info CSI 00000075 [SR] check complete
    2012-09-04 11:53:24, info CSI 00000076 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:53:24, transaction Info CSI 00000077 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:53:38, info CSI 00000079 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:53:38, CSI Info 0000007 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:53:38, CSI Info 0000007 b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:53:52, CSI Info 0000007 d [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:53:52, CSI 0000007e Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:53:52, CSI Info 0000007f transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:53:55, info CSI 00000081 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:53:55, info CSI 00000082 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:53:55, transaction Info CSI 00000083 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:53:57, info CSI 00000085 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:53:57, info CSI 00000086 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:53:57, Info CSI 00000087 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:53:59, info CSI 00000089 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:53:59, CSI Info 0000008 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:53:59, CSI Info 0000008b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:54:09, 000000 a 9 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
    2012-09-04 11:54:10, 000000aa CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:54:10, CSI Info 000000ab transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:54:11, 000000ad CSI Info [SR] verification complete
    2012-09-04 11:54:11, 000000ae CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:54:11, 000000af CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:54:14, 000000 b 1 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
    2012-09-04 11:54:15, 000000 b 2 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:54:15, 000000 b 3 CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:54:19, 000000 b 5 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
    2012-09-04 11:54:19, 000000 b 6 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:54:19, 000000 b 7 CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:54:26, 000000 b 9 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
    2012-09-04 11:54:27, 000000ba CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:54:27, 000000bb CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:54:32, 000000bd CSI Info [SR] verification complete
    2012-09-04 11:54:32, 000000be CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:54:32, CSI Info 000000bf transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:54:38, CSI Info 000000 c 1 [SR] full check
    2012-09-04 11:54:38, CSI Info 000000 c 2 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:54:38, CSI Info 000000 c 3 [SR] beginning operation check and repair
    2012-09-04 11:54:42, CSI Info 000000 c 5 [SR] full check
    2012-09-04 11:54:42, CSI 000000C6 [SR] components Info check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:54:42, CSI Info 000000 c 7 [SR] beginning operation check and repair
    2012-09-04 11:54:46, CSI Info 000000 c 9 [SR] full check
    2012-09-04 11:54:47, 000000 CSI Info [SR] this component check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:54:47, CSI Info 000000cb transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:54:57, CSI Info 000000dc Verify [SR] full
    2012-09-04 11:54:57, Info CSI [SR] 000000dd components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:54:57, CSI Info 000000de transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:55:08, 000000f4 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
    2012-09-04 11:55:09, 000000f5 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:55:09, CSI Info 000000f6 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:55:30, 000000f8 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
    2012-09-04 11:55:31, 000000f9 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:55:31, 000000fa CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:55:42, CSI Info 000000 fc [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:55:42, 000000fd CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:55:42, CSI Info 000000fe transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:55:55, info CSI 00000100 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:55:55, info CSI 00000101 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:55:55, transaction Info CSI 00000102 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:55:57, info CSI 00000104 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "tcpmon.ini" Microsoft-Windows-printing-StandardPortMonitor-TCPMonINI, Version = 6.0.6000.16386, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_INTEL (0), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
    2012-09-04 11:56:01, info CSI 00000106 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "tcpmon.ini" Microsoft-Windows-printing-StandardPortMonitor-TCPMonINI, Version = 6.0.6000.16386, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_INTEL (0), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
    2012-09-04 11:56:01, info CSI 00000107 [SR] this element is referenced by [ml:38 {19}, l:36 {18}] "Windows Foundation.
    2012-09-04 11:56:01, CSI Info 0000010a [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:46 {23}] '------? \C:\Windows\System32"\[l:20{10}]"TCPMon.ini '; source file in the store is also corrupted
    2012-09-04 11:56:01, CSI Info 0000010 c [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:56:01, components of CSI Info 0000010 d [SR] 100 audit (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:56:01, Info CSI 0000010e transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:56:06, info CSI 00000110 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:56:06, info CSI 00000111 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:56:06, transaction Info CSI 00000112 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:56:11, info CSI 00000115 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:56:11, info CSI 00000116 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:56:11, transaction Info CSI 00000117 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:56:24, Info CSI 00000119 [SR] check complete
    2012-09-04 11:56:24, CSI Info 0000011 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:56:24, CSI Info 0000011b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:56:31, CSI Info 0000011 d [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:56:31, CSI 0000011e [SR] Info components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:56:31, CSI Info 0000011f transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:56:38, info CSI 00000121 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:56:39, 00000122 CSI info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:56:39, transaction Info CSI 00000123 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:56:45, info CSI 00000125 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "settings.ini" Microsoft-Windows-Sidebar, Version = 6.0.6000.16615, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_INTEL (0), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
    2012-09-04 11:56:49, info CSI 00000127 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "settings.ini" Microsoft-Windows-Sidebar, Version = 6.0.6000.16615, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_INTEL (0), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
    2012-09-04 11:56:49, info CSI 00000128 [SR] this element is referenced by [l:160 {80}] "' Package_37_for_KB943411 ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ x 86 ~ ~ 6.0.1.5.943411 - 110_RTM_neutral_GDR" "
    2012-09-04 11:56:49, CSI Info 0000012b [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:72 {36}] '------? "\C:\Program Files\Windows Sidebar"------[l:24 {12}] "settings.ini"; source file in the store is also corrupted
    2012-09-04 11:56:50, info CSI 0000012d [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:56:50, CSI 0000012e [SR] Info components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:56:50, CSI Info 0000012f transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:56:56, info CSI 00000131 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:56:56, info CSI 00000132 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:56:56, transaction Info CSI 00000133 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:57:05, info CSI 00000135 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:57:06, info CSI 00000136 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:57:06, transaction Info CSI 00000137 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:57:18, CSI Info 0000013a Verify [SR] full
    2012-09-04 11:57:18, CSI Info 0000013 components [SR] b check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:57:18, CSI Info 0000013 c [SR] beginning verify and repair operation
    2012-09-04 11:57:22, Info CSI 0000013e [SR] full Verify
    2012-09-04 11:57:23, CSI 0000013f [SR] components Info check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:57:23, transaction Info 00000140 CSI [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:57:29, info CSI 00000142 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:57:29, info CSI 00000143 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:57:29, transaction Info CSI 00000144 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:57:34, Info CSI 00000146 [SR] full check
    2012-09-04 11:57:34, Info CSI 00000147 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:57:34, transaction Info CSI 00000148 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:57:42, CSI Info 0000014a Verify [SR] full
    2012-09-04 11:57:42, CSI Info 0000014 components [SR] b check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:57:42, CSI Info 0000014 c [SR] beginning verify and repair operation
    2012-09-04 11:57:51, Info CSI 0000014e [SR] full Verify
    2012-09-04 11:57:51, CSI 0000014f [SR] components Info check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:57:51, transaction Info CSI 00000150 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:57:55, info CSI 00000152 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:57:55, info CSI 00000153 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:57:55, transaction Info CSI 00000154 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:58, info CSI 00000156 [SR] full audit
    2012-09-04 11:58:01, info CSI 00000157 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:58:01, Info CSI 00000158 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:58:05, CSI Info 0000015a Verify [SR] full
    2012-09-04 11:58:05, CSI Info 0000015 components [SR] b check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:58:05, CSI Info 0000015 c [SR] beginning verify and repair operation
    2012-09-04 11:58:10, Info CSI 0000015e [SR] full Verify
    2012-09-04 11:58:11, CSI 0000015f [SR] components Info check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:58:11, transaction Info CSI 00000160 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:58:16, Info CSI 00000162 [SR] check complete
    2012-09-04 11:58:17, info CSI 00000163 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:58:17, transaction Info CSI 00000164 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:58:20, Info CSI 00000166 [SR] check complete
    2012-09-04 11:58:20, 00000167 CSI info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 00000064)
    2012-09-04 11:58:20, transaction Info CSI 00000168 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:58:24, CSI Info 0000016a Verify [SR] full
    2012-09-04 11:58:25, CSI Info 0000016b [SR] audit 92 (0x0000005c) components
    2012-09-04 11:58:25, CSI Info 0000016 c [SR] beginning verify and repair operation
    2012-09-04 11:58:31, Info CSI 0000016e [SR] full Verify
    2012-09-04 11:58:31, CSI 0000016f [SR] repair 2 Info components
    2012-09-04 11:58:31, transaction Info CSI 00000170 [SR] beginning verify and repair
    2012-09-04 11:58:31, info CSI 00000172 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "tcpmon.ini" Microsoft-Windows-printing-StandardPortMonitor-TCPMonINI, Version = 6.0.6000.16386, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_INTEL (0), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
    2012-09-04 11:58:31, info CSI 00000174 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "settings.ini" Microsoft-Windows-Sidebar, Version = 6.0.6000.16615, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_INTEL (0), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
    2012-09-04 11:58:31, info CSI 00000176 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "tcpmon.ini" Microsoft-Windows-printing-StandardPortMonitor-TCPMonINI, Version = 6.0.6000.16386, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_INTEL (0), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
    2012-09-04 11:58:31, Info CSI 00000177 [SR] this element is referenced by [ml:38 {19}, l:36 {18}] "Windows Foundation.
    2012-09-04 11:58:31, CSI Info 0000017a [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:46 {23}] '------? \C:\Windows\System32"\[l:20{10}]"TCPMon.ini '; source file in the store is also corrupted
    2012-09-04 11:58:31, CSI Info 0000017 c [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "settings.ini" Microsoft-Windows-Sidebar, Version = 6.0.6000.16615, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_INTEL (0), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
    2012-09-04 11:58:31, CSI Info 0000017 d [SR] this element is referenced by [l:160 {80}] "' Package_37_for_KB943411 ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ x 86 ~ ~ 6.0.1.5.943411 - 110_RTM_neutral_GDR" "
    2012-09-04 11:58:31, info CSI 00000180 [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:72 {36}] '------? "\C:\Program Files\Windows Sidebar"------[l:24 {12}] "settings.ini"; source file in the store is also corrupted
    2012-09-04 11:58:32, info CSI 00000182 [SR] full repair
    2012-09-04 11:58:32, info CSI 00000183 [SR] validation of transaction
    2012-09-04 11:58:32, info CSI 00000187 [SR] check and complete repair operation. All of the files and registry keys listed in this operation were repaired successfully

    Hi Mzvern,

    ·         If she invites only to install Vista Service Pack?

    That Factory Restore is the last step in resolving this issue.

    Follow these steps to see what Windows Update is originally the question or any error message/code:

    a. click Start, type Update in the start search box.

    b. in the list of results, click Windows Update.

    (c) in the left pane, click view update history.

    In the meantime, follow the suggestions below for a possible solution:

    Method 1: I suggest you follow the article and then check if it solves the problem.

    Windows Update or Microsoft Update repeatedly offers the same update

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/910339

     

    Registry warning

    To do: Important This section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft article:

    Back up the registry

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/back-up-the-registry

    Important: During the scan of the hard drive if bad sectors are found, the scanner tries to repair this sector, all available on which data may be lost.

    Method 2: For cause of CFS, it wasn't able to repair files of Member, you can follow these steps.

    If the System File Checker tool cannot repair a file, follow these steps:1.At a command prompt, type the following command and press ENTER:

    takeown /f Path_And_File_Name

    For example, type takeown /f E:\windows\system32\jscript.dll.

    2. type the following command and press ENTER to grant administrators full access to the file:

    ICACLS Path_And_File_Name/grant ADMINISTRATORS: F

    For example, type icacls E:\windows\system32\jscript.dll/grant administrators: F.

    3. type the following command to replace the file with a known good copy of the file:

    Copy Path_And_File_Name_Of_Source_File Path_And_File_Name_Of_Destination

    For example, type copy E:\temp\jscript.dll E:\windows\system32\jscript.dll.

    For more information, see the following articles:

    How to analyze the entries in the log file generating the program Checker (SFC.exe) resources of Microsoft Windows in Windows Vista

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/928228

     

    Problems with installing updates

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/troubleshoot-problems-with-installing-updates

     

    Let us know the results.

  • VCommander is really a replacement for vCloud Director?

    Hello

    someone said that vMware has bought Embotics vCommander and is to promote the planning is as a replacement for vCloud Director.

    If in the future, there will be no vCloud Director, only vCommander as vCloud 5.5 is the latest version of vCloud Director.

    Can someone shadow light on it if it's true or just a rumor?

    Thank you in anticipation

    Ashish

    vCloud Director goes because there are many common features between vCD and vCAC. And the positioning of these two manufacturers are becoming increasingly difficult. I think that's the only reason why they plan to stop it. And it will always be available to service providers. Not be included in vCloud Suite.

    I don't think that VMware will purchase another product like vCommander and enter in more complex questions of positioning.

Maybe you are looking for

  • proxy server annoy 7.6.7 update?

    Hi all. Got an old school time Capsule. Not sure if it's the 2nd or 3rd gen. In any case, whatever it is, it should support the 7.6.7 recent firmware update. But the update does not appear, and I wonder if it's all of the parameters of the proxy serv

  • HP Jet 7 5709: Shrunk 7 HPStream display area and I can't restore it

    Tablet is updated for Windows 10 and worked well.  While hitting on any fly, all of a sudden I have a larger black surface across the bottom and a much smaller screen.  No matter what I try I cannot reverse this trend and don't know what I did to mak

  • Are there drivers Vista Audio for my Lenovo X 41?

    I can't find a driver for Windows Vista 32 bit Multimedia Audio Driver and the driver for the portrait buttons and landscape on the side frame of the screen. I don't have the controller driver to the LPC Interface Controller under Windows Vista 32-bi

  • error every time I try to install itunes

    I tried to install itunes on my computer, but it keeps coming up that an error has been encountered refractory instalation and run again or press on finish I ran it over and over again but the same error keeps coming up I need help

  • How to undo changes made to trustedinstaller?

    Original title: administration settings I changes in the System 32 properties/titles/owner from trustedinstaller to my administrator user account and later that I got to know that it could create a problem then for security reasons I want to change i