Access BrowserLab behind a proxy

Similar Questions

• Redirect WebLogic behind reverse proxy (https becomes http)

  Hello
  I have a problem with the redirects of weblogic switching protocol https, http when a user is redirected.
  Here's my setup.
  
  1. first of all, to everything there is a loadbalancer that ends the SSL. (BigIP)
  2. in front of the weblogic application server is a reverse proxy to Apache. (www.external.com)
  3 and behind the proxy of the weblogic server hosts the site.
  
  Requests for outside is managed by the proxy in the following way when the user tries to access https://www.external.com/site1
  ProxyPass /site1 http://inside.com/site1
  ProxyPassReverse /site1 http://inside.com/site1
  
  On the weblogic Server I've specified the host och port frontend Frontend to be external.com and 443.
  
  My problem is that when a redirect occur, the user is redirected to http:// www.external.com/site1, not HTTPS.
  
  Can I set up it works somehow?
  
  Kind regards
  
  Henrik

  Hi Henrik,

  You can set it up for you the server managed. Navigate to the managed server, then protocols and HTTP.

  Find Frontend host and Port HTTPS Frontend.

  But Weblogic need to know if she should use the HTTPS front-end Port or the Port HTTP Frontend. So in Apache, you have to set this:

  RequestHeader set WL-Proxy-SSL true
  

  I got this working with Weblogic 10.3.3 but when we went to 10.3.4 it has stopped working. I opened as SR which ended with Oracle saying the Apache/mod_proxy has been certified and the I use mod_wl instead.

  For example, you might have some problems. :-(

  Just had a quick glance at MOS and Oracle now has fessed up and found a fix. Check: WebLogic Server (WLS) 10.3.4 - HTTPS request headers showing that queries on WebLogic HTTP side [1318648.1 ID]

  I just tested a TI work if I set WebLogic plugin active as described in note :-)

  What about Peter

  Published by: Peter Lorenzen August 3, 2011 19:13

  Published by: Peter Lorenzen August 3, 2011 19:27

• I went to Adobe BrowserLab to preview and Internet Explorer was told that the page could not be found, how can I access BrowserLab?

  I went to Adobe BrowserLab to preview and Internet Explorer was told that the page could not be found, how can I access BrowserLab?

  Browser lab is long gone.

• LabVIEW can access a HTTPS site behind a proxy?

  I tried to use LabVIEW to access an https through our firewall/proxy business site and were unable to operate. Anyone has any experience with this and or should this be possible?

  With success, I was able to get the LV websites (http and https) access without going through a firewall and through messages on these forums figured out how to access http site through the firewall, but have developed in white when you try all https sites. Here are a few test cases, I've tried. All these sites are easily accessible via browsers, so it is not because of the firewall/proxy iblocking.

  Any help would be appreciated,

  -Harold

  

  Well, now I understand your configuration. Unfortunately the HTTP client supports only the tunneling proxies (sometimes called gateway proxies, those who accept a connection and then move the application to another server without modifying it) because they occur without intervention of the customer. It is not supported for HTTP proxy servers (sometimes called proxies forward) which, as you have noticed, ask the customer to send a CONNECTION request to the proxy via the SSL protocol.

  To use the HTTP client here, you must configure your proxy to accept HTTPS connections on a different port using a valid SSL certificate and then forward these requests to the remote server as a proxy tunneling.

• A Site to remote access VPN behind the same public IP address

  Got a problem quite stupid.  We have a VPN from Site to Site configured for a new data center, which will be responsible for general traffic management.  In addition, some users need to use use a VPN client to access certain areas.  The firewall at the Office only has a public IP address, so the two will come to the Site to Site VPN for remote access from the same source.

  This seems a problem with legacy Cisco VPN clients because encryption card matches the entry VPN site-to-site, even if they use VPN clients.  A good/simple solution to solve this problem?

  Some newspapers (198.18.85.23) is the address public IP for the office and the tom.jones is the user.  192.168.1.0/24 is the pool of the VPN client.

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % 713130-5-ASA: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, transaction mode attribute unhandled received: 5

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % 737003-5-ASA: PISG: DHCP not configured, no viable servers found for tunnel-group "Corp-VPN.

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % 713119-5-ASA: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, PHASE 1 COMPLETED

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % ASA-3-713061: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, IPSec tunnel rejecting: no entry for crypto for proxy card remote proxy 192.168.1.4/255.255.255.255/0/0 local 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 on the interface outside

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % ASA-3-713902: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x00007fff28dab560, mess id 0x37575f3c).

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % ASA-3-713902: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, peer table correlator Removing failed, no match!

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % 713259-5-ASA: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, Session is be demolished. Reason: political crypto card not found

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % ASA-4-113019: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, disconnected Session. Session type: IKEv1, duration: 0 h: 00 m: 02s, xmt bytes: 0, RRs bytes: 0, right: not found card crypto policy

  January 7, 2014 19:12:53 ASA5515: % 713904-5-ASA: IP = 198.18.85.23, encrypted packet received with any HIS correspondent, drop

  Hello

  Don't know if this will work, but you can try the following configuration (with the rest of the VPN configuration)

  list-access CLIENT VPN ip enable any 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 is the VPN CLIENT address

  card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 set peer 198.18.85.23

  card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-3DES-SHA

  The idea would be to have the ACL matches the VPN full Tunnel that the Client attempts to establish. (destination "any" from the point of view of the customer, the ASAs view source)

  I tested briefly on my own SAA by connecting from an IP address to which the ASA offers free VPN in L2L. But as I don't have the operational L2L VPN, I can't really verify the VPN L2L at the moment. Thus, certain risks may be involved if you can afford it.

  -Jouni

• Creative cloud can not connect behind a proxy.

  One of the more stupid things that Adobe has done is this stupid creative Cloud solution. We have several users who are unable to access the cloud creative because the "brain" (and I use that term in a broad sense) Adobe decided to change their application without any warning.

  When you use Adobe Application Manager, the software would not connect to the Adobe servers when you use a proxy, but it was fine because that at least worked on authentication. Now, even this fails since the update of Adobe Application Manager creative Cloud Desktop App. After a lot of tests and countless tests to try to find a complete application that needs to be constantly updated every time it connects to the internet, I was able to establish that if a proxy pac file is used, then the application does not connect and fails because it cannot find the internet. When a proxy server and port is used, then it connects, but this isn't an appropriate solution.

  Is there someone who was able to use the pac files proxy software enabled?

  BTW, here are a few interesting responses from Adobe support which was without support or advanced experts:

  "You have a connection to the internet?" - after the remote access to my computer... OF THE INTERNET

  "You must start the computer in safe mode." "" ME: "why?" Support: "because this release resources to run the application.

  "It seems that the Internet is not working" - after repeatedly clicking try again

  "" "I'll contact level 2 support and we will be able to help you, because our main concern is that you can get a connection" me: "How long this will take?" Support: "a few hours" - 4 hours later and still no word from tech support and I've worked on the issue.

  So for all those of Adobe, which really wants to help, I'm still waiting on my reminder.

  All the others, I would like to know if someone has managed to get this working with proxy pac files.

  For any one trying to get this stupid thing work, I could find a solution for our environment.

  Adding to both a proxy for users pac file and then allowing server application Proxy settings. This allowed the Adobe Creative Cloud app to connect to internet and update. It also means that we didn't need to add sites in our list of filters, as they were already enabled for users.

  

  Hope this helps others trying to get this to work

• How to create an individual user to access the service of proxy in osb

  Hi all
  
  
  I created a project of the osb. I don't need only one user access to the project with the user name and password. The project should lead to the error when using other credentials.
  
  The hard part, it must return an error even when the username and password is empty. can someone help me solve this problem?

  You can assign that user to a single group in the field of security WL, and then create a global role, which has a membership in a group of only this group. As long as this user who held role.

  Then in the configuration of proxy of the OSB, simply add go the Security tab of the Proxy, then access control. If you click on the link for your proxy, get you a screen similar to that shown in WL to create roles.

  Add conditions, select role, and then add the name of the role in the name of the Role Argument.

  So to invoke the proxy, you must hold the role (which has only 1 member of the group, which has only 1 user). If only 1 user will have this role and can call the proxy server.

• OAAM: IP address of the Client behind ISA Proxy, UIO

  I have a UIO of OAAM deployment behind an ISA proxy server. My problem is that all requests, such as reported in OARM, seem to come from the IP address of the proxy server. I changed the option in ISA server to "requests appear to come from the original client" and breaks everything. What are the other passage options the customer address IP OAAM? At this point geo-location is unnecessary.

  Add the following query interceptor to your UIO proxy configuration:

  < RequestInterceptor id = "AddBharosaUserHeaders" desc = "Add BharosaUserHostAddress, BharosaUserHostName headers" isGlobal = "true" >
  < condition >
  "< name VariableValue ="%URL"value =" "/ bharosauio" mode = "starts - with" case ignore = "true" / >
  < / conditions >
  < filter >
  < name AddHeader = "" BharosaUserHostName: "value ="% hote_distant"/ >"
  < name AddHeader = "" BharosaUserHostAddress: "value ="% REMOTE_ADDR"/ >"
  < / Filters >
  < / RequestInterceptor >

• macOS Sierra Siri behind corporate proxy

  When using wired Ethernet to work, I network settings configured to use Automatic Proxy detection.  All my other network services (Messages, Mail, Safari, etc.) work fine, but systematically reported Siri, "sorry, I'm having problems with the connection.  Please try again in a moment. »

  Out of the corporate network, Siri works.

  Is this a bug with Siri?  Y at - it a configuration option, I can use?  I have no control over the parameters of the corporate proxy.

  Thank you!

  In my company, they told us that it is because of the port used by Siri, which is not supported / opened by our representative.

  -Leif

• Why Firefox 18 behind a proxy server refuses all connections https?

  I used to have Firefox 17 and everything worked ok but I just installed Firefox 18 in my environment of Windows XP sp3 and I can't connect to https through proxy of the company sites.
  Company proxy requires LM/NTLM authentication, the proxy server is a machine IPCOP (squid proxy.)
  After the update to Firefox 18, for all sites that uses an https connection, the answer is:
  The proxy server refuses connections

                Firefox is configured to use a proxy server that is refusing connections.
   Check the proxy settings to make sure that they are correct.
   Contact your network administrator to make sure the proxy server is
     working.
  

  Squid log shows lines with connection refused because of required authentication (domain/username and password) settings
  1357912572.640 1 (my IP) TCP_DENIED/407 1586 CONNECT www.orange.ro:443 - NONE/text/html
  As you can see no domain/username were filled in the newspaper.
  Here is a line with authorization from another browser
  1357920874.657 1348 (my IP) TCP_MISS/200 2549 CONNECT www.orange.ro:443 (mydomain\myusername) DIRECT/109.166.184.137-
  I changed the sensitive data

  Thank you

  I see a lot of proxy problems reported by users of Firefox 18. If you're not the only one with this problem.

  For now, I advise you to go back to Firefox 17.0.1 until Mozilla fixes this bug.

  Link:
  
  http://www.Mozilla.org/en-us/products/download.html?product=Firefox-17.0.1 & OS = Win & lang = en-US
  
  http://www.Mozilla.org/en-us/products/download.html?product=Firefox-17.0.1 & os = OSX & lang = en-US

• Signature behind the proxy in eclipse

  I have the files sigtools.csk, sigtools.db and sigtools.set and I managed to import the signature in the eclipse. But the problem comes when you sign with the same. I get the error "General failure.  Please try again. Server is might be unavailable.

  I understand that the problem is because of the power of Attorney that I used. How can I make sure that the signature tool uses the proxy?

  I checked for many blogs that explains the similar process for BB JDE and also for Eclipse with new installation key... But in my case, I can import only the signatures that I have not the key files...

  Please help add proxies to the signing process.

  Got the solution soon after the validation on board!

  The signature tool where I got the failure message, I have a button named 'Properties' that allows me to enter the proxy details...

  After you add the details of the proxy, it is successful!

• How to grant access browserlabs on my staging site?

  Hello

  Is that someone else uses browserlabs to test a staging site?

  I need to allow the details of property intellectual laboratories of browser on our staging platform, however the two addresses (76.74.170.151and 76.74.145.191), provided in a previous thread do not work. These are public facing only and requests are sent fom a different IP address?

  Someone at - it any other ideas?

  See you soon

  Alan

  Hi Alan,

  My apologies for the delay. The engineer that I had to get in touch with was out of the office. Here's the outgoing IP: 216.104.220.193

  Please let me know how it works for you.

  Best regards

  Corey

• Flash cards behind a Proxy Server

  Hi guys to!
  
  I noticed a few threads about the same problem in this Forum as well. but do not see the answer here.
  
  I have a database of Oracle 11 g with APEX 3.2 using the pl/sql gateway embedded on my home server and use http Apache 2.2 as a proxy server for my applications. I'm running several applications apex, with a wide variety of areas. All works quite nice. A got the app running and everything happens very nice...
  
  Except in my applications flash cards...
  
  I've noticed that I needed to change the variable #HOST # in order to make them work in my environment, but is a "global" variable only? Or y at - it a (simple) way to make them work correctly without hasle by application?
  
  for example: I want to APEX application executes 100 on apex1.com, apex app 200 on apex2.com.
  
  Any thoughts?
  
  
  Kind regards
  
  Douwe Pieter

  Douwe,

  #HOST # seems to be set by the engine of the APEX, and in the current state, we have no control over what it gets the value.

  The improvement would be nice to implement to perhaps even the level of the Application, so that in your situation, you could control HOST for each application.

  Thank you

  -Scott-

  http://spendolini.blogspot.com/
  http://sumnertech.com/

• RV - 120W:how to refuse the user to access certain Web site via proxy server?

  I block some website at the URL Blocking.But can access the Web site that I've blocked via proxy server?

  Can I deny access user proxy server?

  There a lot of proxy server, I can't block the proxy one by one.

  You can use nat, do it selectively. So will not be able to bypass the proxy for outbound or unable to navigate, also the use of the port is using nat, and if no nat, they cannot see anything behind the proxy. If this does not work, also, you can monitor your network with tools like wireshark and blocking the packets to the proxy manually

  Post edited by: Juan Diego Rodríguez Estrada. If this answer is satisfactory to you, please mark it as response. Thanks youMessage was edited by: Juan Diego Rodríguez Estrada. If this answer is satisfactory to you, please mark it as response. Thank you

• Message access control in the OSB proxy service when the Service Type is the Any SOAP Service

  Hello

  We have a proxy OSB service where the Service Type is 'no matter what SOAP Service'. We use Auth.xml to authenticate messages to achieve this proxy service.

  It is, ca we apply Message this proxy access control so that only user A is allowed to sent message has and only user B is allowed to message sent B?

  Us know if the proxy OSB service is based on a wsdl, then we can apply access control message for each operation in the Security tab - and thus specify which user can access the operation. But unfortunately, we have not a wsdl, because this service proxy is a proxy gateway and must accept any SOAP message reaches.

  For example, if the user name in the SOAP header is msgAUser, get is accepted.

  "< soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv ="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">"

  < soapenv:Header >

  "< xmlns:wsse wsse: Security ="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd">."

  < wsse: UsernameToken >

  < wsse:Username >msgAUser< / wsse:Username >

  < wsse:Password >msgApwd< / wsse:Password >

  < / wsse: UsernameToken >

  < / wsse: Security >

  < / soapenv:Header >

  < soapenv:Body >

  <Get>

  ...

  < /Get>

  < / soapenv:Body >

  < / soapenv:Envelope >

  If the user name in the SOAP header is msgBUser, then MessageB is accepted.

  "< soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv ="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">"

  < soapenv:Header >

  "< xmlns:wsse wsse: Security ="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd">."

  < wsse: UsernameToken >

  < wsse:Username >msgBUser< / wsse:Username >

  < wsse:Password >msgBpwd< / wsse:Password >

  < / wsse: UsernameToken >

  < / wsse: Security >

  < / soapenv:Header >

  < soapenv:Body >

  <MessageB>

  ...

  < /MessageB>

  < / soapenv:Body >

  < / soapenv:Envelope >

  Any suggestions please?

  Understood.

  My current client, we have faced the same problem and implemented a similar design which nevertheless has important benefits.

  The problem with proxy input all SOAP is not only in the complexities of authentication. Most important, resources fine grain (thread) management becomes impossible: proxy entry has a workmanager, one constraint of son max. If any single service behind entered proxy knows an influx of requests (because of a peak or a misconfigured customer), he eats the workmanager dry and the rest of the services become too inadmissible.

  In this spirit, we have implemented the following diagram. It's a little more complicated, but it serves us well for a few years already:

  EntryProxy 1-> Interceptor entering Proxy-> Proxy 1

  EntryProxy 2-> Interceptor entering Proxy-> Proxy 2

  ...

  Enter proxy doesn't do Nothing but shall forward the request for interception of incoming traffic. Power of Attorney of the entry, however, has its own WSDL, authentication and the workmanager which allows precise control.

  Another important aspect of a proxy of the entry, it is that it passes a custom header containing the name of the destination of the interceptor, e.g. TargetURI = "ProxyService/Paypal/Paypal.

  Incoming Interceptor Proxy performs all recording, the error handling and other common tasks.

  Then, according to the last header, the proxy of the interceptor makes a dynamic call to route to the specified destination.

  Yes, this design has an additional moving part - a proxy entry - but he a) works b) guard control all in our hands. The entry proxy is a very small point; When I need to make a new one, I just copy an existing one and replace the WSDL file and the value of the TargetURI - 30 seconds of work.

  Hope that helps.

  Vlad

  http://vladimirdyuzhev.com