Adobe RGB 1998 dull export in PNG?

Hello
I am currently working in adobe RGB 1998 on Illustrator CC and when I try to export my work in a PNG file, the colors come out very dull and completely different from the original color. Could someone help me try to understand why this happens?

Thanks for your help!

Isn't it better if you use a workspace sRGB?

Tags: Illustrator

Similar Questions

  • Adobe RGB 1998 Workspace vs Image with embedded sRGB profile

    I worked through countless published on the Web about various aspects of the profile settings of colors from all different angles. Obviously a difficult topic depending on how much you must understand.  For now, I have a question of several party who I would appreciate any feedback on of those in the know.  I'll try to summarize it briefly - it is simply in the default RGB color space setting in CS6 against opening an image that has a different embedded color profile.

    Question

    (1) is it interesting 'potential' to work in color space Adobe RGB 1998 if I open an image with an embedded sRGB profile and "preserve embedded profile?  I realize that any potential benefit could depend on the range of colors in the image itself - that is, where an image with color dull or limited range could not affected by any color profile or workspace is applicable.

    (2) if my color default RGB in CS6 space is Adobe RGB 1998 and I open an image with an embedded sRGB profile, can I convert to Adobe RGB to take advantage of the widest range when working with the image.

    (3) if I don't need to convert an Adobe RGB sRGB image to enjoy the widest range when changes but must register the image with an sRGB profile for purposes of production (out of print or Web presentation service):

    3.1 should I make a copy of the image final and Convert to sRGB or I can just save as Jpeg and select sRGB for the profile to be integrated?

    3.2 irrespective of how I save the final image with an sRGB profile, I would lose some advantage I might have seen while working in the Adobe RGB workspace?

    I am not questioning if there is a good reason to work in sRGB vs. Adobe RGB (or ProPhoto) or under what circumstances it can matter - just trying to figure out a couple of mechanics I would work in Adobe RGB, but have a lot of things (slide previous scans etc.) than sRGB or some other built-in profile.

    Also not to query the best camera settings as I am completely convinced the only way to go is to capture in RAW if the goal is a flexibility to work with the picture (I'm still shooting Fujifilm Provia 100F in my Nikon F6 but eventually will go with a good FX digital SLR when I can rotate - point being that all of the images that I work with is roughly slides scanned on my Nikon Super) COOLSCAN 5000 ED Scanner).

    I understand that it is a topical subject (sRGB vs RGB etc.) and not trying to stimulate a wide debate on the issues.

    Thanks for any thoughts you may have on this topic.

    Jerry Keenehan

    p.s. Here is a comparison of an image of the test case of 14 CS6 Adobe class-in-a-book.  "Rev00" on the left is the original image to sRGB included with the tutorial; "Rev01' on the right is the picture where I have first of all"affected"the Adobe RGB profile, and then (through ignorance, maybe, converted - profile Adobe RGB). I did that because I noticed that I simply convert RGB perceptual colors remain the same, so that if I have 'assign' RGB profile, I certainly get a slight pop at this image - may not be noticeable in this screenshot, but I can definitely see an improvement that I love watching them side by side on my Apple LED Cinema display 27 ".

    Screen Shot 2016-05-21 at 3.43.30 PM.png

    That is right. If the file has embedded sRGB, Adobe RGB workspace is unnecessary and irrelevant. He never comes into play.

    You can, however, convert the file in Adobe RGB if you plan to make a big change on that, and you think you might need the extra margin of a larger color space.

    If you assign a profile (for an untagged document), there is not need to convert to the same.

  • Download Adobe RGB (1998) ICC profile for Linux

    Hi, I am trying to download Adobe RGB (1998) ICC profile for profile ICC downloads - Linux or Unix Linux (end-user profile), but nothing happens after that I accept the terms and conditions. Anyone knows where can I go? Thank you.

    Which linux distribution do you use?

    You need to download the

    FTP://FTP.Adobe.com/pub/Adobe/ICCProfiles/Linux/AdobeColorProfiles-end-user.rpm.tar.gz

    then right-click and open in Archive Manager where you can extract the files.

    If you can not even open them trying this one for windows

    Adobe - ICC profiles: For Windows: profile downloads for Windows

    In addition, you may be able to use some Manager package provided with your distribution, search for icc profiles and there may be some that you can install.

  • Profiling evidence broken with Adobe RGB 1998 color images

    I recently discovered a problem with Photoshop CS6 on my Windows 7 system. When you perform the proofing with "Proof colors" selected on the Adobe RGB 1998 color profile images there is loss of Red saturation. When checking the ProPhoto RGB, Colormatch RGB, and sRGB image files there is no difference with the same profile selected in the Conditions of proof options settings. This only happens with images Adobe RGB 1998. I even tried ProPhoto RGB, Adobe RGB images conversion to be sure that it is not a problem with the file. Problem with the Adobe RGB files.

    I just tried my PS 32-bit installationn and does NOT have this problem, just the 64-bit version.

    Here is an example:

    Proof Colors - Adobe RGB 1998.jpg

    Put your performance of the GPU to base parameters, otherwise PS maybe ask the GPU for color mapping and there may be problems with this:

    https://forums.Adobe.com/message/6219761

  • Why the colour profile Adobe RGB (1998) get stripped when I save a TIFF as a psb?

    I say cab to incorporate Adobe RGB color profile (1998) when I generate a TIFF of DNG. So far so good: bridge shows the tiffs as tagged with Adobe RGB (1998) in the category of metadata "Color Profile". When I save a TIFF as a PSB (large Document Format), I leave ticked the box to incorporate that color profile. But once the backup completed, bridge shows the psb as "Untagged" in the category of metadata "Color Profile". Similarly, the 'Get Info' box, under 'Détails', lists no color profile for the psb. Is this normal? If Yes, then what is the best way to get the psb tag Adobe RGB (1998)? And if not, then how can I get Photoshop to successfully integrate Adobe RGB (1998) when I save the tiff as a psb in the first place? Thanks for your help! -Mark

    Your file is like most even when referenced, but Bridge preferences are set so that they do not deal with an overview on this large-format, so it turns non-marked. I bet that if you open the psb file and choose the drop down menu to display the color profile to the lower left of the document window, it displays the correct profile.

  • Adobe RGB 1998 rendering TIFF apear dark in CS4

    I recently installed an update to CS4 on my Macbook Pro. CS3 is installed to the left for daily use up to this I have time to explore the CS4.

    In doing so, I noticed something strange. Although all preferences and color are the same, open the same file in CS3 and 4 gives a very different picture. I photograph with a Phase One digital back. The FIRST images are processed to TIFF by the latest version of Capture One. They wear so profile Adobe RGB 1998 (8BPC). CS3 and -4 are configured to the same profile, so there is no inconsistency when opening. There is only a small (and normal) visible difference between the Capture excerpt One and the TIFF-file open in CS3.

    Open the file in CS4 however gives a darker (about + 1.5 f-stop) and more saturated images. It has nothing to do with the two versions running at the same time.

    #1 details: activate the tab "version cue" the bottom says 'open' in CS3 and 'unmanaged file' in CS4

    Detail #2: activate 'warning of the range' shows no warning in CS3, while CS4 displays a large number of pixels "out of gamut".

    Any ideas?

    DUP, Sanicle post

  • Should what color settings I choose for photoshop ProPhoto RGB, Adobe RGB 1998 or other?

    Please tell me what color settings should I use to apply on Photoshop and Lightroom. ProPhoto RGB, Adobe 1998 or another? Thank you.

    Nice day!

    If you work mainly for printing AdobeRGB seems a good choice, if you work primarily for the web, I would recommend to use sRGB.

    Kind regards

    Pfaffenbichler

  • For the printing of P.O.D.: how to set the Adobe RGB color space

    Hello and thank you in advance,

    (I use InDesign CS 5.5 on a Mac).

    I need set the appropriate PDF export settings

    To print a book on demand, with color drawings inside on the text pages.

    The instructions in Mandarin that I could find, say this:

    'Submit your graphics in color space Adobe RGB, integrated withprofile.'

    The big Question: how should I do that?

    I know enough to start with

    File-> Adobe PDF Presets-> print quality

    Then I click on the Menu 'output '.

    and this is where I start to get lost.

    for

    Color conversion...

    I think I should choose "convert to the Destination.

    for

    Destination

    I think it should be "Adobe RGB (1998).

    Now to incorporate this profile.

    What should I choose in virtue:

    Profile Inclusion policy?

    And is there anything else I should do to get these inside good printing color images?

    Thanks again,

    IthacaAuthor (aka ZorbaTheGeek, but the forum wouldn't let me connect with my old screen name)

    Virtually all digital printing is done via PostScript or PDF. In the first case, the PDF file is converted to use viat PostScript to Acrobat and in the latter case, the PDF file is sent directly to the digital printer.

    In both cases, CMYK is actually the real destination color space. There is no true RGB printer! What is true is that non-PostScript / non PDF (laser printers generally low range and inkjet printers as well as specialized sublimation photo printers inkjet and dye) take RGB via drivers and that convert to CMYK, but I don't think that's what you deal with.

    Our recommendation to Adobe for best printing results, whether for offset or digital, is to export PDF into PDF/X-4 with no color conversion using the default color CMYK (CMYK SWOP) space or if the contrary view of your print service provider, among other CMYK color spaces provided by Adobe or the print service provider themselves. FWIW, more peripheral to digital print on demand, have settings to fully emulate the SWOP CMYK printing requirements. The use of PDF/X-4 in this way allows the existing color in your document InDesign is properly tag in the output PDF file and converted to CMYK RIP the device level digital printing.

    (It may also help us if you can provide a pointer to the explicit instructions provided by your print service provider.)

    -Dov

  • Calibrate vs Adobe RGB profile

    Hello!

    I am trying to get my printed canvases in a reliable way.   I photographed my paintings, the uploaded on PHOTOSHOP, edited and saved then their printed in a local print shop.  I did all this, but what print does not match my retouching photoshop/monitor of paintings at all.

    They told me that I need to get my monitor calibrated using a product called Spyder5Pro and then use display profile Adobe RGB 1998.

    I used the function of my iMac monitor calibration, but it created some weird colors for my monitor.  It also seems to create it's own display different from the profile Adobe RGB 1998 profile.  They seem to be mutually profiles!

    I have for the Spyder5Pro, but now I wonder if it will create its own profile to display, as different from the Adobe RGB 1998.

    How do I as well to calibrate my monitor AND use the Adobe RGB profile?

    My goal is to be able to create my own JPEG files for printing purposes, because I like editing my own photos of my paintings, and the cost of printing to scan my paintings and then colour correct them is crazy.

    Help!  ... and thank you!

    Anne

    Fundamental reflections on the color management:

    My colors are different outside of Photoshop. | Error postal codes of Mylenium

    My printed colors are bad. | Error postal codes of Mylenium

    It is not one or the other, it is always the full mile. Once you "calibrate" anything, you will need to complete as a result. Yes, your Spyder will create a custom monitor profile and you must say PS in prrof installation methods and assigning your Adobe RGB to your document.

    Mylenium

  • Crash Acrobat DC output Preview Adobe RGB

    Open a CMYK PDF / X file

    Print Production-> output preview

    Profile Simulation on Adobe RGB (1998)

    Result: Acrobat DC Crash

    Known problem, MacOS version of Acrobat DC with all versions of MacOS (not only 10.10), discussed in dozens of previous discussions. Difficulty in the update in a few weeks.

    -Dov

  • Preview color management issue - glued assigned Adobe RGB image

    I often web elements page layout in InDesign that my composition tool, then copy and paste in Photoshop as a smart object to then generate optimized web images. It's just easier to use photoshop. Problem, it is in the latest versions of Adobe have clogged the engine of anti-aliasing and now when rasterising a PDF file or paste a picture also as a chip oppose any portion of the image of this asset is smoother. You don't really notice that if the image of origin placed in InDesign is say double or more this resolution of the web version of final product, the scale hides the issue. But if they are closer to really see faceting full size occurs. Long story... anyway, I decided to study the implementation overview of Apple as a gateway for the rasterising instead of photoshop. He did a good job on glued assets resampling, but on this point saving and checking in Photoshop, I note that Preview assigned Adobe RGB profile to the processed image. Even if I opened the InDesign PDF and export as image in my size. My color workflow is sRGB. InDesign and Photoshop are two parameters in this way, the image placed in InDesign also has sRGB profile, the PDF has sRGB profile. If I copy / paste between InDesign and Photoshop, they are both aware glued Trump space and warn me if different from that of the target document. I have no idea where Preview becomes Adobe RGB, I don't see its place in the app to change that as a preference, and in any case, it seems very strange to be a defect when most of the people would not use them.

    In the preview, click on the tools bar menu point and scroll to the bottom of the drop-down list to assign the profile

    the next submenu you can click on and select sRGB at the bottom of this list. To save this profile to your image,

    do a "save under" (click on file, press the option/alt key Save As should appear). You can also test under the view menu bar item.

  • I've just updated to Photoshop, CC 2015.0.1, and I can't do 'Quick export in PNG' with several plans to work more? Any ideas?

    Update Photoshop CC 2015.0.1, I can do is no longer the 'Quick export in PNG' with several work plans more.

    I currently work with about 10 + work plans and I normally ' file > export > rapid export in PNG ", I had no problem in the previous version of Photoshop, but since I updated yesterday to the latest version, is no longer shows the pop-up asking where I want to save the png and instead" does nothing?

    Any ideas?

    Thank you

    Rob

    Please try and reset the default Photoshop preferences, if you do not customize your Photoshop after the last update.

    Steps to follow:

    To re-create the Photoshop preferences files, start the application while pressing Ctrl + Alt + Shift (Windows) or command + Option + shift (Mac OS). Then, click Yes to the message, "Delete the Adobe Photoshop settings file?"

    Let us know if that helps.

    Kind regards

    ~ Mohit

  • Does make any sense to use Adobe RGB to process a photo taken in sRGB?

    On the one hand, it seems that color for any photo post-processing would be limited to information of color captured by the sensor.  You cannot work with information that isn't here.  For example, if the camera were to sRGB, sRGB information don't that would capture all the sensor.  Post processing in a larger color space like Adobe RGB, would be foolish.  On the other hand, I suppose it is possible that PS, during any process of development of color, could present me with ARGB options (i.e., options a wider color space) and map of smaller space (sRGB) to the largest (ARGB).

    As far as I know, most DSLRs offer sRGB or ARGB option.  However, I know there are those who value their color space ProPhoto in PS; so, there may be a post processing value in a color space that is larger than the space used by the camera to capture color information.   In case it is not obvious, I'm confused.  Any help would be appreciated.  Thank you.

    If you capture images JPEG in sRGB then files are limited to smaller color space and cannot be extended to a larger range such as Adobe 1998 or ProPhoto color space.  If your RAW capture files then it's not what your profile settings of cameras are because the Raw files are just text information of your sensor which has not been made to the pixels even serious.  It's an essential difference.  If you open a RAW file in ACR you can render pixels in any color space.

  • Export to PNG sequence exports only main timeline? I can understand everything?

    Hello world

    I have a Flash (CS6) animation animation is mostly in video Clips, although there are a few on the main timeline (which is of 500 images of length).

    When I export to PNG sequence, all that appears in the png's animation in the main scenario - video clips are not read.

    Is it possible to export the entire animation made to PNGs in Flash or should I get some 3rd party use?

    Thank you

    Richard

    Ok thank you. I found a great free Adobe AIR app that does exactly that, in the case where all other readers need to do too: http://swfrenderer.kurst.co.uk/

  • Adobe RGB monitor problem

    I own a dell 2408wfp monitor that works with adobe RGB. Photoshop seems to realize that and automatically adjusts the colors of srgb images preview, so that it "corresponds to" srgb color settings. When exporting the image and them preview in a browser the colours are - of course - far more intense, I guess it's because the browser go to adobe RGB monitor. the problem: the preview in photoshop on my adobe RGB monitor looks almost the result on a screen normal srgb. the colors are all wrong. get the best (= best record) occurs when the lowering in the intensity of the colors in the settings of the monitor and look at the result in my browser.

    is it possible to disable the "monitor profile" in photoshop, to show only the 'wrong' colors / too intense?

    thx for your help!

    Yes, you can do what you want.  Although the colors won't be accurate you can set it up so that sRGB images are displayed, as with non - or partially-color management applications.

    But you do not set the screen profile association by Photoshop.  You do it by the operating system.

    In Vista and Windows 7:

    • Click Start, then in the search box, type color management .
    • When color management is displayed, click it.
    • Click the devices tab.
    • Choose [] use my settings.
    • Add profile sRGB IEC61966 - 2.1 to the list and make the (default).

    It could also be useful, if the monitor offers such a feature, set it to emulate specifically sRGB.  Some monitors offer this feature.

    When you gain a better understanding of the works of color management, and want more precise color that you can trust your monitor, then you can invest in a unit of measurement of color with which you can calibrate/profile your system.

    -Christmas

Maybe you are looking for