adrelink dating status 1 - Impossible to apply patches.

Similar Questions

• adrelink dating status 1

  Hi all
  
  OS: OUL5x65
  EBS R12 12.0.6
  
  runtime upgrade 10 12.1.1 patch 7303030
  I have error adrelink on several modules like "MSCXGCAL", "MSCSLD"... the product MSC
  
  Reissue of links module "MSCXGCAL", the SCM product...
  
  do /u01/oracle/SAM/apps/apps_st/appl/msc/12.0.0/bin/MSCXGCAL /u01/oracle/SAM/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/SAM/out/link_msc_10192.mk f
  
  From the link of the SCM executable 'MSCXGCAL' on my Sep 12 12:03:45 EDT 2009
  g ++-m32-L/u01/oracle/SAM/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/lib-L/u01/oracle/SAM/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/lib/stubs - lclntsh o /u01/oracle/SAM/apps/apps_st/appl/msc/12.0.0/bin/MSCXGCAL /u01/oracle/SAM/apps/apps_st/appl/msc/12.0.0/lib/mscxgcal.o.
  ......
  ' le/SAM/apps/apps_st/appl/mso/12.0.0/lib/libmso.a(msopomresourcebkt.o): meaning of article scrapped. GNU.linkonce.t._ZN7OmValue3addEd' of u01/oracle/SAM/apps/apps_st/appl/mso/12.0.0/lib/libmso.a(msopomresourcebkt.o)
  collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
  make: * [u01/oracle/SAM/apps/apps_st/appl/msc/12.0.0/bin/MSCXGCAL] error 1
  Done with the link of the SCM executable 'MSCXGCAL' on my Sep 12 12:03:48 EDT 2009
  
  Relink the module 'MSCXGCAL' failed.
  See error messages above (also recorded in the log file) possible
  reasons for the failure. In addition, please check that the Unix username
  running adrelink to read, write and execute permissions
  on the u01/oracle/SAM/apps/apps_st/appl/msc/12.0.0/bin directory.
  and that there is enough space on the disk partition
  containing your Oracle Applications installation.
  
  
  Please give us a solution.
  Thanks in advance.
  Tom

  Tom,

  Please see these documents.

  Note: the 601828,1 - reissue of executable links MSC errors
  Note: 781553.1 - R12: cannot be reprinted executable MSC on OEL5/RHEL5

  Kind regards
  Hussein

• Impossible to apply the update

  Automatic updates of Windows using these 4 security updates continually fails when you try to update - KB973705 KB974554, KB972580 KB974771.
  I used the automatic Windows update successfully for years.

  I was directed DIRECTLY download each update security - individually.
  I went to-http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/results.aspx?displaylang=en&freetext=security%20update
  and KB973705 KB974554, KB972580 KB974771 added one at a time
  in the search engine, then downloaded successfully on my desktop.

  I tried to use each installation file, and had all the programs are closed including antivirus programs.

  Every time that crosses the entire patch update process, and then at the end, I get this error message.

  IMPOSSIBLE TO APPLY THE UPDATE

  I try next?

  Hello

  Welcome to Microsoft Windows 7 answers Forum!

  You can try the steps below and check if the problem is resolved.

  This problem may occur if some of the windows update components are corrupt, so we will try to reset the windows update components and find the number.

  You must follow the link provided below to run the fixit which will automatically fix the problem if you find problems with the fixit, then you can follow the procedure to manually reset Windows component update.

  How to reset the Windows Update components?

  http://support.Microsoft.com/default.aspx/KB/971058

  Also, visit the following link for more reference.

  Troubleshooting Windows Update or Microsoft Update when you are repeatedly offered an update

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/910339/

  Hope this information is useful.

  Thank you, and in what concerns:

  Suresh Kumar-Microsoft Support.

  Visit our http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/answersfeedback/threads/ Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Impossible to apply the resource of DRS

  The VI interface I have a yellow box on this node within a message saying:

  Impossible to apply settings of resource of DRS on the host 'XXXXX' (reason: a general error occurred: failure). This can drastically reduce the effectiveness of th DRS

  Here are my logs to vmkwarning (the end of the file):

  31 Mai 15:06: 20 GQV00500 vmkernel: 82:05:12:21.482 cpu4:1041) WARNING: ScsiDevice: 3731: ABILITY to READ on device "vml.02000b000060060e8005488c000000488c0000074e4f50454e2d56" Plugin "legacyMP" failed. Not supported

  31 Mai 15:06: 20 GQV00500 vmkernel: 82:05:12:21.483 cpu4:1041) WARNING: ScsiDevice: 3362: failed to vml.02000b000060060e8005488c000000488c0000074e4f50454e2d56: unsupported

  31 Mai 15:06: 20 GQV00500 vmkernel: 82:05:12:21.483 cpu4:1041) WARNING: ScsiDevice: 3731: ABILITY to READ on device "vml.02000b000060060e8005488c000000488c0000074e4f50454e2d56" Plugin "legacyMP" failed. Not supported

  31 Mai 15:06: 20 GQV00500 vmkernel: 82:05:12:21.484 cpu4:1041) WARNING: ScsiDevice: 3362: failed to vml.020009000060060e8005488c000000488c000007284f50454e2d56: unsupported

  31 Mai 15:06: 20 GQV00500 vmkernel: 82:05:12:21.484 cpu4:1041) WARNING: ScsiDevice: 3731: ABILITY to READ on device "vml.020009000060060e8005488c000000488c000007284f50454e2d56" Plugin "legacyMP" failed. Not supported

  31 Mai 15:06: 20 GQV00500 vmkernel: 82:05:12:21.484 cpu4:1041) WARNING: ScsiDevice: 3362: failed to vml.020009000060060e8005488c000000488c000007284f50454e2d56: unsupported

  31 Mai 15:06: 20 GQV00500 vmkernel: 82:05:12:21.484 cpu4:1041) WARNING: ScsiDevice: 3731: ABILITY to READ on device "vml.020009000060060e8005488c000000488c000007284f50454e2d56" Plugin "legacyMP" failed. Not supported

  31 Mai 15:06: 20 GQV00500 vmkernel: 82:05:12:21.485 cpu4:1041) WARNING: ScsiDevice: 3362: failed to vml.020009000060060e8005488c000000488c000007284f50454e2d56: unsupported

  31 Mai 15:06: 20 GQV00500 vmkernel: 82:05:12:21.485 cpu4:1041) WARNING: ScsiDevice: 3731: ABILITY to READ on device "vml.020009000060060e8005488c000000488c000007284f50454e2d56" Plugin "legacyMP" failed. Not supported

  2 Jun 03:01:29 GQV00500 vmkernel: 83:17:07:32.631 cpu2:1036) WARNING: FS3: 3495: status bad003f cleaning HB

  Did you try this KB

  vcbMC - 1.0.6 Beta

  Lite vcbMC - 1.0.7

  http://www.no-x.org

• apply patch

  Hi all
  
  I 10.2.0.2 DBs run on conf Dataguard on redhat. I must apply patch 5458753 DBs. I read the Readme, but there are 2 ' Instructions of Installation of Patch ' and ' special Patch Instructions ' section
  
  1 - What is the difference between these sections?
  2 - I know,
  (a) stop the observation process to disable fast switching
  (b) waiting for shutdown DB
  (c) stop DB primary
  (d) unzip the fix on Standby DB and change to this directory. "cd 5458753" and then run command "opatch apply.
  (e) unzip the primary fix on DB and change to this directory. "cd 5458753" and then run command "opatch apply.
  (f) primary DB startup
  (g) startup mount standby DB
  (h) to start the process of observation
  (i) check the status of the DG.
  (j) apply status with the command «opatch lsinventory» check patch and I have the ability to roll back this appy patch with '"cd 5458753 then' opatch rollback-id 5458753"
  
  This way is correct? did I miss smth? or ideas would be appreciated...
  
  Thank you.

  as you know my patch isn't a patch of cpu and I have 10g DB.
  I think my way is correct according to your link, right?
  can I use my steps to apply this patch?

  Yes you can follow the same steps.
  Here is a note of reference more for you, which is also applicable for the interim patch patch/CPU/PSU.
  * How do you apply a group of patches, the power supply or the CPU in a configuration of data secondary physical custody [278641.1 ID] *.

  HTH...

• 11.5.9 to 11.5.10 upgrade missing file error - adrelink exit status 1

  I'm in the transformation of our system of 11.5.9 upgrade to 11.5.10.2 on a Linux 4.5.
  
  Although patch 4337683 I fell on the missing files that required me to apply patches 2214446 and 2284692. After going through the steps on both of these patches I always get a missing file error when he tries to recreate a link to ENCACN.
  
  I get the following error:
  $APPL_TOP/sht/11.5.0/lib/rwave/libstd8s.a: no such file or directory
  
  I searched for what either by reference to that particular file and can't find anything on the web. I also noticed that I have no sending directory and I also searched the whole score and this file does not exist. I have to miss another patch I think.
  
  Can someone tell me the missing hotfix?
  
  Thank you
  
  Tim
  
  Published by: user12055581 on November 5, 2009 12:45

  Hello

  Please see if these documents help.

  Note: 360673.1 - error in the reissue of "ENCACN" links - $SHT_TOP/Lib/Rwave/Libstd8s.A: No. Such File or Directory
  Note: 371424.1 - reissue of links WICMLX failed: /sht/11.5.0/lib/rwave/libstd8s.a: no such file or directory
  Note: 143992.1 - adrelink.sh fails with sh: VAC: not found

  If you can't find the fix missing in these documents, please log an SR.

  Kind regards
  Hussein

• Apply Patch 6400501

  Dear Experts,

  I put DB 11.1.0.7 on R12.1.1 to 11.2.0.4.

  As a conditional requirements I must apply Patch 6400501 .  I read by read me file, I read this note under conditions:

  -Must have located this patch via a bug database entry and have the exact symptoms described in the bug entry.

  My question: what is the bug database entry? How can I find the patch in? How can I determine if this patch is suitable or not?

  Kind regards

  Ahmad,

  Ahmad,

  There is nothing to do about this step, just make sure that you download the patch appropriate via the site Web of MOS and complete the rest of the steps in the README file.

  Entry database of bugs is the internal name of the site hosting for Oracle/bug fixes.

  Thank you

  Hussein

• Impossible to apply the resource DRS settings on host.the of object has already been completely created this can drastically reduce the effectiveness of the DRS

  Impossible to apply the resource DRS settings on host.the of object has already been completely created this can drastically reduce the effectiveness of the DRS

  host is having above mess on summer please help on this

  I found the correct solution

  ESXi 5.1 U3 is the permanent fix for this issue

  U3 is fix

• Errors in trying to apply Patch 6400501 as a step of pre-upgrade (11.2.0.3)

  I am applying Patch 6400501 as a pre - req for a GR 2 11 upgrade and get the following messages.
  
  This has been already applied once before without problem on another server.
  
  The process contained in the error messages - are not active - or at least I can't see them not active.
  
  How can I stop?
  
  Thank you
  
  
  
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  appltest@testap01:/stage/patches/6400501 > opatch apply
  
  Setup Oracle interim Patch version 1.0.0.0.64
  Copyright (c) 2011 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved...
  
  Oracle recommends using the latest version of OPatch
  and read the OPatch documentation in the docs/OPatch
  Directory for its use. For more information on the last OPatch and
  other support issues, please refer to document ID 293369.1
  available on My Oracle Support (https://myoraclesupport.oracle.com)
  
  Oracle home: /d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2
  The Oracle Home Inventory: /d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/inventory
  Inventory Center: / d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/inst/apps/EBST2_tebsap02/admin/oraInventory
  from: /etc/oraInst.loc
  YES location: /d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/oui
  YES shared library: /d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/oui/lib/linux/liboraInstaller.so
  Location of Java: /d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jre/1.4.2/bin/java
  Location of the log file: /d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/.patch_storage/ < patch ID > / *.log
  
  Creation of log file "/ ds01/mclebs/EBST2/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/.patch_storage/6400501/Apply_6400501_07-17-2012_11-10-44.log".
  
  Appeal of fuser to check active processes.
  
  Fuser invoking "/ d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/wrap".
  Invocation of fuser to jump on "/ d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST//apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/oracle" file does not exist or is a directory.
  Fuser invoking "/ d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/proc".
  Fuser invoking "/ d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/rman".
  Invocation of fuser to jump on "/ d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/extproc" file does not exist or is a directory.
  Problems verifying files that are active.
  The following files have the active process when there should be no activity.
  Before proceeding, stop and stop all active processes.
  1 /d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/wrap
  2 /d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/proc
  3 /d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/rman
  
  
  ERROR: OPatch failed during the prerequisites check.
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  Problems verifying files that are active.
  The following files have the active process when there should be no activity.
  Before proceeding, stop and stop all active processes.
  1 /d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/wrap
  2 /d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/proc
  3 /d01/xxxxx/EBSTEST/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/rman

  Use the command fuser to find the process ID and kill it manually - http://linux.die.net/man/1/fuser

  Or, a question ' ps - ef | grep applmgr"assuming applmgr is the owner of the files and kill all active processes using"kill - 0 .

  Or just restart the box and make sure that none of the services is started automatically.

  Thank you
  Hussein

• Error applying Patch 9593176

  Hello
  
  When do I apply patch 9593176 the following error appeared:
  

  Oracle Home       : /oracle/div4db/11.1.0
  Central Inventory : n/a
     from           : n/a
  OPatch version    : 11.1.0.6.2
  OUI version       : n/a
  OUI location      : n/a
  Log file location : /oracle/div4db/11.1.0/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2012-02-24_13-40-03PM.log
  
  ApplySession applying interim patch '9593176' to OH '/oracle/div4db/11.1.0'
  
  Running prerequisite checks...
  Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
  The details are:
  Patch 9593176: Required component(s) missing : [ oracle.developer.forms, 10.1.2.3.0 ]
  ApplySession failed during prerequisite checks: Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
  System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
  
  OPatch failed with error code 74

  I checked the OAS 10.1.2.3.0 version and it is

  Quite obvious:

  Oracle.Developer.Forms, 10.1.2.3.0

  While

  Oracle home: /oracle/div4db/11.1.0

  which seems to be the home of the oracle of a 11.1 database. Have you set the environment variable oracle_home to your installation of forms home before calling opatch oracle?

  see you soon

• Impossible to apply settings of resource of DRS on host (reason: a general error occurred: failure). This can drastically reduce the effectiveness of the DRS

  We have a group of 10 hosts working ok for months. Last week, we get the error

  Impossible to apply settings of resource of DRS on host (reason: a general error occurred: failure). This can drastically reduce the effectiveness of the DRS

  on one of the hosts.

  looking to restart the hosts but not sure this could cure the problem.

  Have you tried the steps in this KB?

  Application of parameters of DRS to an ESX host generates an error (1004667)

• adupdeul dating status 1

  We integrate discoverer 10g with 11i EBS, following MOS 313418.1
  
  In step #: 7.2
  
  I copided find out everything under AU_TOP for standalone BI server, then unzippied in $ORACLE_HOME/discoverer/discover
  
  However, when I try to run adudeul.sh, fails with the error.
  
  
  SH /u01/app/oracle/product/discoverer/discoverer/adupdeul.sh connect=sysadmin/sysadmin@11idev resp = "system administrator" gwyuid = fndnam APPLSYSPUB/PUB = APPS secgroup = topdir=/u01/app/oracle/product/discoverer/discoverer/adupdeul.sh 'Standard' language = US eulprefix = EUL OLTP mode = logfile=/home/oradisco/import_complete_eul_us_11idev.log = eultype = / u01/app/oracle/product/discoverer full iashome "
  
  
  SH /u01/app/oracle/product/discoverer/discoverer/adupdeul.sh connect=sysadmin/sysadmin@11idev resp = "system administrator" gwyuid = fndnam APPLSYSPUB/PUB = APPS secgroup = topdir=/u01/app/oracle/product/discoverer/discoverer/adupdeul.sh 'Standard' language = US eulprefix = EUL OLTP mode = logfile=/home/oradisco/import_complete_eul_us_dev11i.log = eultype = / u01/app/oracle/product/discoverer full iashome "
  **********************************************************
  You run adupdeul, version 115.17
  
  Beginning of the session adupdeul
  Time is Sun Sep 18 20:23:42 IST 2011
  Log file is /home/oradisco/import_complete_eul_us_dev11i.log
  Are command line arguments
  'connect=sysadmin/sysadmin@dev11i '.
  "RESP = system administrator.
  "gwyuid = APPLSYSPUB/PUB.
  "fndnam = APPS.
  "secgroup = Standard.
  'topdir=/u01/app/oracle/product/discoverer/discoverer/adupdeul.sh '.
  "language = en.
  "eulprefix = EUL.
  "eultype = OLTP.
  "mode = full".
  "iashome = / u01/app/oracle/product/discoverer".
  'logfile=/home/oradisco/import_complete_eul_us_dev11i.log '.
  
  
  
  The top-level directory must be a valid directory and you
  must have privileges to access this directory.
  
  adupdeul dating status 1
  
  End of session adupdeul
  Time is Sun Sep 18 20:23:42 IST 2011
  **********************************************************
  
  I gave all 777 permissions to the directory of discoverer under BI OH
  
  $ ls - LRT
  Total 52
  drwxrwxrwx 3 oradisco oinstall 4096 2 August discover 01:23
  31 oradisco oinstall 4096 drwxrwxrwx 9 August 12:50 doc
  drwxrwxrwx 2 oradisco oinstall 4096 9 Aug 12:51 mesg
  drwxrwxrwx 5 oradisco oinstall 4096 9 Aug 12:57 plus_files
  drwxrwxrwx 2 oradisco oinstall 4096 Aug 9 deploy 12:57
  drwxrwxrwx 2 oradisco oinstall 4096 August 9 records 12:57
  drwxrwxrwx 2 oradisco oinstall 4096 Oct 14 17:27 safe
  -rwxrwxrwx 1 oradisco oinstall 872 15 Sep 05:25 discwb.sh
  -rwxrwxrwx 1 oradisco oinstall 871 15 Sep 05:26 discwb.sh_org
  drwxrwxrwx 2 oradisco oinstall 4096 Sep 15 21:39 util
  drwxrwxrwx 2 oradisco oinstall 4096 Sep 15 lib 21:40
  drwxrwxrwx 2 oradisco oinstall 4096 15 Sep 21:40 config
  -rwxrwxrwx 1 oradisco oinstall 0 17 Sep 15:29 error.txt
  -rwxrwxrwx 1 oradisco oinstall 847 Sep 18 20:22 adupdeul.log
  $ pwd
  / u01/app/oracle/product/Discoverer/Discoverer
  $

  'topdir=/u01/app/oracle/product/discoverer/discoverer/adupdeul.sh '.

  What happens if you replace the above "topdir = / u01/app/oracle/product/discoverer/discoverer ', make the same mistake then?

  Thank you
  Hussein

• apply patch 6194129 large number of/usr/bin/ld errors

  Hello
  
  an operating system linux - x 86.
  EBS:11.5.10
  
  Try to apply patch 6194129 (developer6i_patch19). Get a lot of error messages like/usr/bin/ld: WARNING: architecture i386 in the input file "tmabox.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64.
  log file:
  
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "uatstubs.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / of02/patches/developer6i_patch19/bin/genshlib ifjapi60 0
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "context.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "create.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "destroy.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "formsapi.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "iauasst.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "iauexcep.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "ifjapi.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "objlib.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "persistc.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "ibp30r.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "ibp30w.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "ibp40r.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "ibp40w.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "ibp4cr.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "ibp4cw.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "ibp4gr.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "ibp4gw.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  / usr/bin/LD: warning: architecture i386 in the input file "ibp4wr.o" is not compatible with the release of i386: x 86-64
  etc.

  Here I have no workaround for the problem solution...

  The solution is to install the crux of application layer of your Apps 11i instance on a 32-bit operating system.

  Thank you
  Hussein

• Install on 9.1 - apply patch 7303029 seems to hang

  Version 2.1.8. Running the install do step on ' 9.1 - apply patch 7303029"and it seems to just be hung and I'm not find a way to find out why." " On the MW server log file has not been updated for close to 30 minutes, and no log file have been created in the folder of fix on the application server logs. All told the newspaper MW is lower, but the process shows as still running. Have to admit that I'm a bit frustrated having to open discussions or SR for each step. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!
  .
  UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD
  oramwiz 32041 17353 0 07:17? 00:00:00 / usr/bin/ksh/u01/mwiz/mwizdb/10...
  .
  Here is a summary of the log on the MW Server (script_10735.sh.log)
  OK - patch GENERIC appears on the local computer
  OK - copied 7303029 in apps
  Try to unpack the patch: 7303029 on the remote node: apps
  Archive: p7303029_12.1.0_R12_GENERIC.zip
  inflating: 7303029/README.html
  extraction: 7303029/SuccessfullyRanAdjcopy.txt
  inflating: 7303029/u7303029.drv
  inflating: 7303029/f7303029.ldt
  extraction: 7303029/j7303029_3p.zip
  extraction: 7303029/j7303029_ak.zip
  .......
  Starts the file echo newspaper
  .
  This is the last line in the log that has been there for more than 30 minutes. Still once, no log files are on the server applications, and there is nothing in the record of preinstallation.
  .
  There is no task in this section.
  =====================================================

  Let's try this.

  1 kill the process
  2. set "Setup" step to REDO the ACTION (open stage already run and click on the button ACTION REPEAT.)
  3. attach the un_zip.sh to have an o
  4. run the Setup again

  I believe that since it's preinstall mode only the driver file gets copied into the directory of your preinstallation. You can check if u7303029.drv is the directory of preinstallation.

• Impossible to apply the 10.2.0.3 for 10.2.0.4 patches group

  Hi gurus,
  
  
  Oracle version: 10.2.0.3
  Operating system: Linux 2.6.18 qtl1-251 - 164.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 03:33:56 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
  
  Yesterday, I was able to make the Group of hotfixes in 10.2.0.1 10.2.0.3 but now I am facing problem check operating system has failed.
  

  [oracle@qtl1-251 Disk1]$ ./runInstaller 
  Starting Oracle Universal Installer...
  
  Checking installer requirements...
  
  Checking operating system version: must be redhat-3, SuSE-9, SuSE-10, redhat-4, redhat-5, UnitedLinux-1.0, asianux-1, asianux-2 or asianux-3
                                        Failed <<<<
  
  Exiting Oracle Universal Installer, log for this session can be found at /u01/app/oracle/oraInventory/logs/installActions2012-01-04_05-22-08PM.log

  Here is the result of my/etc/redhat-relese

  [oracle@qtl1-251 Disk1]$ cat /etc/redhat-release 
  redhat-4
  #CentOS release 5.4 (Final)

  Thank you and best regards,
  Kahina Prasad.S

  You should read the release notes and try the recommended change or use the ignoreSysPrereqs parameter:
  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/B19306_01/Relnotes.102/b15666/TOC.htm#CJAFHGHG

  Nicolas.