Agent upgrade on the DataGuard configuration

Hello

Win x 64 server
Oracle 10.2.0.3.0
Agent 10.2.0.3.0 (go 10.2.0.5)

Last days I've been patching all the agents out there, nothing complicated on this matter, but now I came to our configuration dataguard, for me, it seems that this will not matter, I have found no documentation contends it would be different, since the agent are separated from data bases itself.

#shut to the bottom of the agent
#patch

Grateful for answers,.

There is nothing special dataguard / agency relationship. As usual, upgrade after upgrade test, and if you find any problems you will need to remove the target, and add it again.

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • vCenter Agent upgrade during the upgrade from 5.0 to 5.1

    I was hoping someone can answer a question for me please about the upgrade to vCenter Agent

    By choosing the vCenter Agent upgrade, automatic choice would require guests be restarted? I guess that the answer is no, but here your audit. I have attached a screenshot for you to see.

    What is best practice, automatic or manual. I have 1 datacenter, 3 groups. 1 cluster 5.0 other 2 clusters 4.1

    photo.JPG

    Auto choice would require guests be restarted?

    reset is not necessary...

    If you choose the manual option you must goto each host and then re - connect the host so that the agent, VPXA gets upgraded and connected to vCenter

  • RMAN archive deletion problem in the dataguard configuration

    I have a weird problem in all our databases with dataguard. When we issue "delete archivelog all saved on the drive; 1 times"the archiving that have not been backed up logs are also appear as candidates for deletion.

    To confirm these observations, I did a test in our lab.

    (A)

    On a stand alone DB, I took a backup and then move the log files.

    archivelog all list, any backup archivelog 1 times the disk device type from the list and delete archivelog all saved 1 time on device type disk - all these three orders the results expected. Especially the third command showed only archived newspapers backed up as candidates for deletion

    (b) then I installed dataguard, save on primary and switched some log files.

    Now, list archivelog all and list archivelog all saved 1 time on device type disk yielded expected results.

    BUT delete archivelog all saved 1 time on device type disk shows the newspaper archive, even those that have not been backed up as candidates for deletion. It's curious me as far as command list gives the current results.


    Everyone saw this behavior. Let me know if you need any o/p for this problem. Thanks for your help...

    If someone is after that, there is a bug/patch for 11.2.0.4. Patch has solved the problem for me.

    Bug 16692232 - RMAN backup archivelog all not backed up / remove any entry does not work as expect you (Doc ID 16692232.8) Down
  • How to disable the dataguard configuration?

    Hello


    env: Oracle 10 g 2 (10.2.0.5), RHEL 5.8


    I created a database waiting for a prim. Now I have to spend the day before the "Prim", stop the original role "prim" and disable all DG related configuration.


    I think to take following steps (in the order listed):


    Switch to standby mode (stdby will become prim and prim will become Stdby). Then:

    On Stdby (which now is prim):

    Change the setting: Enable, Disable LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_STATE_2


    'Set null' all these parameters:

    LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_STATE_2

    LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2

    FAL_SERVER

    FAL_CLIENT

    LOG_ARCHIVE_CONFIG

    The Prim (which isn't Stdby):

    Shutdown


    It is that OR is it more than that?


    Please let me know if there is no error or if I missed something?


    Best regards

    Hello;

    It should work. You need not to stop the primary database for this.

    On Oracle 11, you can use:

    ALTER DATABASE GUARD NONE;

    I don't know if it works on Oracle 10 and all my databases Oracle 10 disappeared.

    Best regards

    mseberg

  • Dataguard Configuration database upgrade

    Hello

    I have some doubts regarding the upgrade of database in dataguard configuration. Could someone help me please.

    -How update occurs in the dataguard configuration?
    -Is that we must install only different OH in both? And once the catupgrade script is run on the primary, it will automatically update pending as well?
    - Or is to upgrade the two separately? That is to say, first aid and then primary or vice versa
    -Can reduce us downtime by breaking the dataguard config. Do a permutation, and do secondary as main and primary upgrade first?
    And once the upgrade is complete in the primary, raise and improve the day before. And later once the upgrade completed on standby, primary synch and sleep.

    Please share your ideas and your thoughts!

    Thank you!

    First of all, - steps may differ about the version upgrade but - my post with the following link might help clarify the concept.
    http://emrebaransel.blogspot.com/2009/02/10204-upgrade-with-DataGuard.html

    user1982050 wrote:
    Hello

    I have some doubts regarding the upgrade of database in dataguard configuration. Could someone help me please.

    -How update occurs in the dataguard configuration?

    First you patch the binary Oracle both primary and standby. Then open services dataguard and upgrade the primary, standby database will update already.

  • DataGuard configuration

    Hello

    Operating system of my main server is 32-bit Windows. The backup server operating system is 64-bit Windows. Can I configure the Dataguard configuration. It works perfectly?

    Thanks in advance.

    Operating system of my main server is 32-bit Windows. The backup server operating system is 64-bit Windows. Can I configure the Dataguard configuration. It works perfectly?

    You did not mention the version of the database that you could use. 11 g, Yes, it is possible to have different primary and eve of binary OS.

    You can refer to this https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e41134/standby.htm#SBYDB00067

    HTH

    -Jonathan Rolland

  • Mac Air 1.3 Ghz i5, 4 GB ram end of 2013 everyone upgraded to El Capitan with the same configuration?

    worried about the going 10.10.5 Yosemite to El Capitan. Especially with only 4 GB of ram. Have 256 GB SSD HARD drive

    would appreciate an answer from people already have the upgrade.problems with the same configuration? slower?

    FWIW, the El Capitan applications are no different from Yosemite. In fact, it is easier on resources in some areas. The main thing you need to worry is to make sure the software and equipment to use is compatible. Make sure you have a good backup in case you change your mind and want to downgrade.

  • Upgrade to the latest version of Firefox, but the user agent remained at 3.6.

    Mint Isadora 64-bit. Finally, I upgraded to the latest stable version 3.6 in the Launchpad repo. I can't install any addons now because addons.mozilla.com said I use 3.6. Troubleshooting information, it seems that my user agent still said 3.6. Subject: firefox said I use 6.0.1. How can I fix the user agent?

    https://support.Mozilla.com/en-us/KB/websites+or+add-ons+incorrectly+report+incompatible+browser

  • demote the Group patch 3 10.2.0.5 in dataguard configuration

    Hello

    We run in running in linux x86_64 5 update 7 dataguard configuration.

    primary database "single instance": 10.2.4.4 (downgraded to 10.2.0.5)

    STANDBY database "2xnode CARS": 10.2.0.5 (need to downgrade)

    primary database successfully downgraded after slaughter again shipping services, etc...

    in 10.2.0.5 readme group of hotfixes, I can't find a note dealing with the ' how to make to delete/uninstall only from binaries group of patches as in dataguard we must not to run one of the scripts what database keys.

    thanking you in anticipation.

    Kind regards

    -Ahmad

    Hi Andre,

    It is not possible to uninstall a group of patches. Either Oracle home must be restored from Oracle home or install it again. Once this is done, you can simply enable log shipping and it should take care of database backup.

    334598.1 - how to restore a group of patches

    Thank you

    Ashish

  • Host Agent pre-upgrade: run the utility to upgrade on another computer?

    Hello

    I want to upgrade vCenter Server 4.1 to Version 5 soon. vCenter is now installed on a W2K3 - x 64 server and I want to replace that server with a new material and W2K8R2.

    So I read the Upgrade Guide and KB1031307. I want to use the same PB and update.

    There is a point that I do not understand: the vCenter Agent pre-upgrade Checker host checks to questions about the agent on the ESX host computers software. It verifies if the agent software can be updated etc.

    KB 12031307 it is written that when upgrading on the same machine, I have to run the pre-upgrade utility.

    Under the point upgrade to vCenter Server on a different Machine and upgrade the existing database , nothing is said about running the utility to pre-staged at level or not!

    What I need to run in this scenario, or is it not necessary? In my view, the host ESX Server software is updated the same way, without worrying if I do an upgrade on the same server or on another machine... so I guess I need to run on the old server before you perform the upgrade on the new machine?

    Thanks for any help/explanation

    Best regards

    Roland

    So is it necessary

    • Run the tool on the old server
    Yes, we run on the existing VC server. If we try on a new computer, pre-upgrade installation fails because there is no certificate for the available existing Vcenter server file.
    • the reported problems

    Before the upgrade, we have to solve the problems if problems are identified.

    • start the process of upgrading to the new server

    Yes, we have to do the installation of VC on the new machine pointing to the existing DB server. Installer will make the necessary changes to DB.

    Its good to run DB pre-staged at level too, to confirm there is no problem next DB which will stop the upgrade. DB pre-staged at level details is available here.

    http://KB.VMware.com/kb/2004286

  • The OEM 10 g to 11g without Agent upgrade

    I am trying to upgrade only the SGD to 11 g. Currently I'm under 10.2.0.5 to the SGC and 10.2.0.4 for the agent version. DB repository is 10.2.0.4.
    According to the note 11 GR 1 material [412431.1] supports any agent of 10 g. However there is no option to send the agent installation. It upgrades the SGC and the agent at the same time.

    Does anyone know how to update the control grid without upgrading the agent?

    Thank you.
    Shawn

    You can check what versions of the agent will work with WHO 11 g: Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control Certification Checker [412431.1 ID].
    Here, you can also consult the agent versions and make them supported database versions.

    Eric

  • I have Firefox installed 42.0 and works correctly. Yahoo on Firefox indicates this, but Yahoo on Chrome keeps asking me to upgrade to the latest Firefox

    I use mainly Firefox and Chrome only as an emergency backup. I still have backup third IE and Yahoo by default, thus opening 'IE' takes me directly to Yahoo.com. In Chrome and this 'fake IE', Yahoo says to upgrade to the latest Firefox. I even updated a second time to 42.0 Firefox but Chrome and 'fake IE' Yahoo wants the latest update me of Firefox. In Firefox, there is none that question. If so, can or should be done?

    airider said

    And I don't know how Firefox/Yahoo and non Yahoo/Chrome or IE/Auto-Yahoo acknowledges what version I am running.

    Browsers generally identify themselves to Web sites. If you want to see what your browsers send, you can use my test page - the "user agent" string is displayed in red:

    https://jeffersonscher.com/RES/jstest.php

    It is a little confusing: browsers may raise on behalf of other browsers to inform Web sites that they can deal with the pages designed for other browsers.

    But browsers do not send a list of ALL of your software on your computer - thank God - so if you visit a site with chrome, it cannot know which version of Firefox, you have, or even if you have Firefox at all.

    There is an exception to this absolute statement, called Flash Local Storage Objects, sometimes called super-cookies. If you visit a site in the browser F and allow the site to use Flash and store data on your computer, then when you visit the same site in the browser to C, if you allow the site to use the Flash, it can read these data and know that you have already visited and connect your two browsers.

  • Why my iMac turns so slowly after the upgrade of the Lion in El Capitan?

    Why my iMac turns so slowly after the upgrade of the Lion in El Capitan?

    Just what do slow down? Rotation beach balls?

    Run and view the results here so that we know more about your configuration.

    http://etrecheck.com/

    EtreCheck

    https://discussions.Apple.com/docs/doc-6172

  • How to install a foxit button in my toolbar? I've recently upgraded to the latest version, but my toolbar does not contain a firefox button that is necessary for certain tasks, such as the private browsing.

    I had an existing laters 3 point what Firefox and recently upgraded version upgraded to Firefox 10. This new version has still the old toolbar at the top, but there is no button "Firefox" that one has to use to activate certain actions such as "private browsing". Is there anyway I can install the button in the toolbar, or is it possible to change to the new interface of version 10 which includes the Firefox Button. I prefer the old (the old configuration with the toolbar on top, but if that can't do, how to migrate to the new configuration that apparently puts the tools on the side, if I'm not mistaken.
    Thanks for any help you can provide. I have Windows XP.

    If you have the toolbar to the former, you can always go to private browsing by clicking on tools, then on 'Start private browsing'. All located in the Firefox button options in the old-style toolbar, just maybe a little more hidden.

    To activate you button Firefox, go to view, then toolbars, then uncheck "menu bar". You should have the Firefox button.

  • I've upgraded to the latest Firefox, but something prevents reading Web sites that I have. I already tried to uninstall and reinstall.

    I've upgraded to the latest Firefox, but something prevents reading Web sites that I've updated. I already tried to uninstall and reinstall.

    At first, I thought it was a specific Web site, but I found that it is affecting my sites on a set path. Yet once, I already tried uninstalling and reinstalling firefox. It doesn't seem to affect one of my other internet browsers.

    It would not be a problem, but most of the sites are demanding I upgraded and even disabling certain features until I do.

    Your user agent is corrupt and which identifies you as Firefox/3.0.13

    see your user agent:

    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; RV:1.9.0.13) Gecko/2009073022 Firefox/3.0.13 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

    you need to reset the user agent

    Thank you

    Please check 'Resolved' the answer really solve the problem, to help others with a similar problem.

Maybe you are looking for