ALTER table table_name move tablespace

Hello

IM using oracle 11.1.0.7.0 on aix 5.3, most of the users in my database is assigned to the SYSTEM tablespace, and their objects are also created in the SYSTEM tablespace.

IM planning to run Alter table table_name move tablespace nom_tablespace;

y at - it no need to run index rebuilding or the above command will automatically index rebulid.

Thank you
SQL> alter table table_name move tablespace users;
Table altered.

SQL> alter index index_name rebuild tablespace users;
Index altered.

SQL> select status from user_objects where object_name = 'INDEX_NAME';
STATUS
-------
VALID

Source: -.
http://www.orafaq.com/Forum/t/21672/2/

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • Alter table: column Move buttons disabled up and down

    Hi all!
    I am trying to modify a table, high passage at the bottom of the columns, and the two buttons are disabled. I can add and remove columns using this interface, but not not moving them. I use the latest version of the software (1.5.4)
    Suggestions are welcome!
    Thanks in advance.
    Sebastian

    This is the way of working of Oracle databases. To rearrange the columns, you should re-create the table. Should be easy enough to rename, and then create a new one with a CREATE TABLE... IN SELECT.
    The buttons in sqldev are there for the new columns order.

    Have fun
    K.

  • Security move the table to another tablespace

    I would like to pass on my table to a different tablespace by using the statement:
    ALTER TABLE table_name move tablespace new_tablespace;

    I am interested in what happens if someone wants to select or modify some data during the process of alteration (on the table table_name). I tested on the database of test (without a users) and everything was OK, but I wonder what happens if someone edit or select data. Could you recommend me how to protect this table? Change in playback mode or change the database in the mode of restriction? Thanks for the tips.

    Hello

    The table is locked automatically during the MOVE ALTER TABLE. If other sessions can still perform selects, but no changes can be made during the DDL.
    Don't forget to re-create the indexes on the table later.

    Concerning
    Maurice

  • Move the table in same tablespace is not reorganize the data

    Hello.

    I am facing a problem that I have not used to have.  First of all, a description of our envorinnement:

    We have a few large tables partitioned and performance optimization, our ETLs use bluk, add notes, parallelism and so on.  This create several holes of unused space in tablespaces/data files as well a kind of leak of space on our drives.

    A complete correction would re-create the tablespaces move everything is of opposes another.  It would be impratical, because there are about 15 who are top of 100 GB; the time and effort to recreate everything is not affordable for the Business.

    Instead, we have a single proc that comes to calculate the actual amount of used space (converted to blocks) and makes a move of all objects above this block_id.  Just after this operation, there is a dynamic shrink based on the new HWM (given that the objects have been moved) on the data file freeing disk space.  As we have a datafile by tablespace and a tablespace by schema, we would like to keep this body, if we make a single movement for objects, like 'ALTER TABLE' | owner: '. ' || nom_segment | "MOVE; "(the complete query works with all types of data such as partitions of table objects, the index partitions and the subpartions).  This will move the object in the same space for the first freespace on the tables and free up space at the end of the file to shrink.  In theory.

    This unique proc used to work properly.  In a 650 GB GB 530 tablespace in use moving about 20 that Go (the amount of data beyond the HWM 530 GB) is simpler than to create a new file/TBS and the displacement of 20 GB is faster than Go 530.

    But suddenly things changed when some TBS refused to be narrowed.  What I found out: the command move doesn't fail, it works very well and Oracle really moves the object.  But for reasons that I don't know, he's not moving it at the beginning of the file, it keeps the object at the end.  So the da calculates the new HWM, but because some objects that were in the tail of the queue, the shrink is done with a very high HWM, if no real space is reclaimed.

    So, the main question: How does the ALTER TABLE FOO MOVE really works?  I thought that it would be always to move the object to the beginning of the file thus reorganize, but I analyzed the last objects that gave me this problem (block_id before and after the move, compared to block_ids empty and everything) and actually, I see that they were moved at the end of the file, although there is enough space to accommodate initially.

    Okay, I think I found the problem.  Before that I just pulled the script as posted, but then I had the good idea to improve its performance with parallelism, so I added:

    ALTER SESSION FORCE PARALLEL QUERY 16 PARALLELS;

    ALTER SESSION FORCE PARALLEL DDL PARALLEL 16;

    ALTER SESSION FORCE PARALLEL DML PARALLEL 16;

    Returning to prallel not running, that I could reuse the freespace on the beginning of the file, and then narrow it down.

    Obviously, each writing data in parallel mode reuse freespace, I just forgot that a TABLE ALTER MOVE is also a data write operation.  I fell a bit ridiculous, caught in the same trap that I was trying hard.

    Thank you all for the comments and advice.

  • Invalid option to TRUNCATE PARTITION in ALTER TABLE

    Below edit sql works fine when I run this one.

    ALTER TABLE table_name TRUNCATE partition partition_nm UPDATE GLOBAL INDEXES;

    But if I run this procedure I get the error message "14054. 00000 - option ALTER TABLE TRUNCATE PARTITION invalid"

    create or replace PROCEDURE TRUNCATE_WS_CLAIMS_REPORT

    as

    whole crsor;

    rval around edge;

    Start

    crsor: = dbms_sql.open_cursor;

    DBMS_SQL. Parse (crsor, ALTER TABLE table_name TRUNCATED partition partition_nm INDEXES', dbms_sql.v7 GLOBAL UPDATE);

    rval Tip: = dbms_sql.execute (crsor);

    DBMS_SQL.close_cursor (crsor);

    end;

    Can you guide me how to solve this error?

    Have you tried to run immediately instead of dbms_sql?

    Start

    run immediately "ALTER TABLE table_name partition TRUNCATE partition_nm UPDATE GLOBAL INDEXES";

    end;

  • ALTER table move online in an encrypted tablespace

    Hello

    Our DBA want to put all our data in encrypted storage.

    Once they create encrypted tablespaces, we will have to do «alter table move online...» "orders for encrypted storage space around the tables.

    Has anyone here done already?   Keeps the table moved really 'on-line' (available at query/insert/update) during the move?  Or will we have to wait some time stop/downtime while the tables are moved?
    What about the tables with long or CRAFT?

    Thank you!

    KSandberg and to add to the recall of John that only ITO tables can be moved online, if the table needs to be moved offline the indexes would be invalid until rebuilt.  If the table is an IOT I suggest you rebuild the index online after the move because even if the indexes are always used the logical ROWID is more pointing to the correct location and access of the index will be less effective that will you rebuild the index.

    - -

    The dbms_redefinition package could be an alternative solution if you need to move the tables no - ITO online.

    - -

    HTH - Mark D Powell.

  • in what version of oracle alter table move tablespace introduce

    Hello

    Can you please provide me with information to present including oracle realease oracle alter table move tablespace nom_tablespace; ...

    Thank you

    Actully had this... that first of all we create a table using DEC and then delete the old table and then re-create the table with the original name, this way we'll finally have table > with the same name and data.

    But he has disadvantanges that
    (1) there is no index, we recreate.
    (2) no constraint, we need to redefine tht.

    Please confirm to me... I am right or wrong here...

    Thanks a lot for your answers anantha all the... It's my last request... Please respond

    To avoid TELL-benefits mentioned above,

    -Export the table or the diagram.
    (create two discharges of export.
    1. with the owner or table with index = n lines = n - This will export all the objects without indexes, and lines. In other words, the metadata will be exported with regard to a table or schema.
    2. with the owner, or a table with index = lines y = y - this will export all the objects from a table or schema.

    -Remove the table
    -Recreate the Table (using export generated from option 1 above)
    -Import the data without indexes and constraints are imported. (use of export generated from option 2 mentioned above. use ignore = y,)
    constraints and indexes = n = n here.)
    -Import(re-Create) indexes and enable constraints (using export produced option 2 rows = n ignore = y)

    See the Oracle 7 here documentation

    -André

  • ALTER table move lob segment of a partition

    How I could move a LOB from a table segment partitioned (11.1 DB)?

    I have after the table script:
    CREATE TABLE COMMON.TEST_AAA2_ARH
    (
      ID           INTEGER,
      TEKST        VARCHAR2(200 CHAR),
      UPDATESTAMP  DATE,
      OBJEKAT      CLOB
    )
    LOB (OBJEKAT) STORE AS (
      TABLESPACE COMMON_ARCHIVE
      ENABLE       STORAGE IN ROW
      CHUNK       8192
      RETENTION
      NOCACHE
      LOGGING)
    TABLESPACE COMMON_ARCHIVE
    LOGGING
    PARTITION BY RANGE (UPDATESTAMP)
    (  
      PARTITION P_201012 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2011-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
        LOGGING
        NOCOMPRESS 
        TABLESPACE COMMON_DATA
        LOB (OBJEKAT) STORE AS (
          TABLESPACE USERS
          ENABLE       STORAGE IN ROW
          CHUNK       8192
          PCTVERSION  10
          NOCACHE
          LOGGING),  
      PARTITION P_201101 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2011-02-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
        LOGGING
        NOCOMPRESS 
        TABLESPACE COMMON_DATA
        LOB (OBJEKAT) STORE AS (
          TABLESPACE USERS
          ENABLE       STORAGE IN ROW
          CHUNK       8192
          PCTVERSION  10
          NOCACHE
          LOGGING),  
      PARTITION P_MAXVALUE VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
        LOGGING
        NOCOMPRESS 
        TABLESPACE COMMON_ARCHIVE
        LOB (OBJEKAT) STORE AS (
          TABLESPACE COMMON_ARCHIVE
          ENABLE       STORAGE IN ROW
          CHUNK       8192
          PCTVERSION  10
          NOCACHE
          LOGGING)
    )
    NOCOMPRESS 
    NOCACHE
    NOPARALLEL
    MONITORING;
    and I would switch USERS tablespace lob segment to the other...

    TNX

    ALTER table move partition lob () store as (tablespace )

    SQL> CREATE TABLE WISSEM.TEST_AAA2_ARH
    (
      ID           INTEGER,
      TEKST        VARCHAR2(200 CHAR),
      UPDATESTAMP  DATE,
      OBJEKAT      CLOB
    )
    LOB (OBJEKAT) STORE AS (
      TABLESPACE EXAMPLE
      ENABLE       STORAGE IN ROW
      CHUNK       8192
      RETENTION
      NOCACHE
      LOGGING)
    TABLESPACE EXAMPLE
    LOGGING
    PARTITION BY RANGE (UPDATESTAMP)
    (
      PARTITION P_201012 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2011-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
        LOGGING
        NOCOMPRESS
        TABLESPACE EXAMPLE
        LOB (OBJEKAT) STORE AS (
          TABLESPACE USERS
          ENABLE       STORAGE IN ROW
          CHUNK       8192
          PCTVERSION  10
          NOCACHE
          LOGGING),
      PARTITION P_201101 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2011-02-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
        LOGGING
        NOCOMPRESS
        TABLESPACE EXAMPLE
        LOB (OBJEKAT) STORE AS (
          TABLESPACE USERS
          ENABLE       STORAGE IN ROW
          CHUNK       8192
          PCTVERSION  10
          NOCACHE
          LOGGING),
      PARTITION P_MAXVALUE VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
        LOGGING
        NOCOMPRESS
        TABLESPACE EXAMPLE
        LOB (OBJEKAT) STORE AS (
          TABLESPACE EXAMPLE
          ENABLE       STORAGE IN ROW
          CHUNK       8192
          PCTVERSION  10
          NOCACHE
          LOGGING)
    )
    NOCOMPRESS
    NOCACHE
    NOPARALLEL
    MONITORING;
      2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56
    Table created.
    
    SQL> ALTER TABLE WISSEM.TEST_AAA2_ARH MOVE LOB (OBJEKAT) STORE AS (TABLESPACE USERS);
    ALTER TABLE WISSEM.TEST_AAA2_ARH MOVE LOB (OBJEKAT) STORE AS (TABLESPACE USERS)
                       *
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-14511: cannot perform operation on a partitioned object
    
    SQL> ALTER TABLE WISSEM.TEST_AAA2_ARH MOVE PARTITION P_201101 LOB (OBJEKAT) STORE AS (TABLESPACE USERS);
    
    Table altered.
    
    SQL> 
    

    Published by: orawiss on May 5, 2011 14:03

  • ALTER table move & shrink space

    Hello
    What is the difference between alter table move and alter table shrink space orders
    Two free blocks not used in the table so that the free space will be given to the tablespace. Can you explain mw in detail or provide some links

    Sekar_BLUE4EVER wrote:
    Hello
    What is the difference between alter table move and alter table shrink space orders
    Two free blocks not used in the table so that the free space will be given to the tablespace. Can you explain mw in detail or provide some links

    ALTER table move would make invalid indexes and would require so rebuild you the index. In addition to him, it requires extra space in the tablespace, even that would be used for the creation of the object in double. So if you have a table of 10 GB, you need additional 10 GB free todo table alter move. Whereas in the narrowing is a place, the online operation, does not make you go and rebuild the index because it doesn't make them not disabled, requires no additional space to have.

    HTH
    Aman...

  • ALTER table move partition in parallel

    Hello

    I wish that this command must be run in parallel. is this possible?

    ALTER TABLE xyz PARTITION MOVE xyz_p0608 TABLESPACE q208_ts

    Thank you
    parallel_clause
    
    Purpose
    
    The parallel_clause lets you parallelize the creation of a database object and set the default degree of parallelism for subsequent queries of and DML operations on the object.
    
    You can specify the parallel_clause in the following statements:
    
        * CREATE TABLE: to set parallelism for the table (see CREATE TABLE).
        * ALTER TABLE (see ALTER TABLE):
              o To change parallelism for the table
              o To parallelize the operations of adding, coalescing, exchanging, merging, splitting, truncating, dropping, or moving a table partition
    

    To parallelize append operations, coalescence, Exchange, merger, splitting, truncate, delete or move a partition table

  • ALTER table a enable row movement cause problem

    Hello

    I did allow the movement of the row in the table and then shrink the space. which causes the performance issue? If so, how? How to allow the movement of the line and shrink the work of space internally?

    can deposit in full table scan, then the idexes on this table is not used more?

    947721 wrote:

    can shrink space available internally to what extent?

    Use the following syntax in a google search: alter table shrink space site: docs.oracle.com

    Note, by the way: "allow the movement of the line" allows you to take advantage of the features of line-movement, but he made no movement.

    Concerning
    Jonathan Lewis

  • Rearrange tables in the tablespace

    Hello

    I have 5000 table 10 tablespace and 4000 index in tablespace 8
    I have to reorganize all of these existing tables to a single tablespace and all indexes in a single space.
    Could you please suggest how this can be done?


    Thank you
    KSG

    Hello

    I should do a dump of the statements:

    spool table_move.sql
    select 'alter table '||owner||'.'||table_name||' move;' from all_tables
    where owner in ('owner1','owner2')
    /
    spool off
    

    After that, you can run table_move.sql under SYSTEM.

    For indexes, the code will be:

    spool index_move.sql
    select 'alter index '||owner||'.'||index_name||' rebuild tablespace new_tablespace;' from all_indexes
    where owner in ('owner1','owner2')
    /
    spool off
    

    If it is only a single schema, you can also query user_tables and user_indexes.

    Hope this will help.

    Herald tiomela
    Superconsult.nl

  • ALTER TABLE RETRACTABLE is possible online?

    RDBMS Version: 11.2.0.4

    Platform: Oracle Linux 6.4

    We have a database of CARS of Production 2 nodes very critical. To recover the space, we want to cut some large tables. The first table we'll shrink is a 300 GB, which is not partitioned with no LOB table.

    Here are the steps that we'll run.

    Step1.alter mytable table allow the movement of the line;

    Step2.alter mytable table shrink space compact;

    Step3.alter mytable table shrink space;

    Step4.alter table mytable disable the movement of the line;

    STEP 5. COLLECT STATISTICS of the table (because the RETRACTABLE table will cancel all the sliders in the shared pool)

    The steps above will take at least 10 hours to complete a 300 GB table. We would like to know if all of these steps can be done online. That is to say. We do not want the SHRINK command to lock the table and prevents the table to be modified (any DML) by the application

    Doc below said this can be done online. But, MOS DOC 1357878.1 said that it is not and you must use the DBMS_REDEFINITION package if you want to do it online.

    https://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E18283_01/server.112/e17120/schema003.htm

    The MOS article you are talking about is not correct. Outside the DOF at the end of a SHRINK lock when the high tide is shifted, SHRINK the SPACE is an online operation. DBMS_REDEFNITION is actually worse because you have DDL locks at both the beginning and the end. However, in both cases, it is the DDL that is blocked by other operations DML (and not the other way around) so that your users will have no problem. If the narrowing or the redefinition is blocked, you can suspend the database for a few seconds. I described how to do here,

    Database Quiesce

    --

    John Watson

    Oracle Certified Master s/n

  • Online syntax to create Foreign key with Alter Table statement

    I am a pretty meticulous reader. That being said, from the 4 texts that I read to start to learn SQL, I do not remember and do more that probably not, find a syntax online for the creation of a CF with the statement alter table.

    Just something I thought while I was reading.

    Is there a such syntax?

    And if so someone can give me direction on my code?

    ALTER table emp4 change employee_id key foreign employees of references (employe_id);

    It gives me the option error invalid alter table.

    Any idea would be appreciated.

    Thank you.

    rp0428 wrote:

    A foreign key is a constraint, you must use ADD CONSTRAINT.

    Thare is more than one way to skin a cat:

    SQL > create table tbl (id number, name varchar2 (10))
    2.

    Table created.

    SQL > alter table tbl adds (foreign key references emp (empno))
    2.

    Modified table.

    SQL > select constraint_name,.
    2 constraint_type
    3 from user_constraints
    4 where table_name = 'TBL '.
    5.

    CONSTRAINT_NAME C
    ------------------------------ -
    SYS_C0021920 R

    SQL > drop table tbl purge
    2.

    Deleted table.

    SQL > create table tbl (id number, name varchar2 (10))
    2.

    Table created.

    SQL > alter table tbl change (foreign key references emp (empno))
    2.

    Modified table.

    SQL > select constraint_name,.
    2 constraint_type
    3 from user_constraints
    4 where table_name = 'TBL '.
    5.

    CONSTRAINT_NAME C
    ------------------------------ -
    SYS_C0021921 R

    SQL >

    SY.

  • ALTER table, if not amended

    Hi, thank you very much in advance. How to add columns to a table only the columns not yet existed.

    ALTER table

    table-name

    Add

    (

    column1_name column1_datatype column1_constraint,

    column2_name column2_datatype column2_constraint,

    column3_name column3_datatype column3_constraint

    );


    If column1_name does not exist I have add the column in table_name. Otherwise, do not add the column.


    Best regards, ib

    Here the case, I give my client a script and if they add columns or not, I don't know. So, I want only the columns are added to the case where they do not exist. The script includes other ddl and dml so I don't want a mistake due to the change table make the script error. Thank you.

    Sorry-, you will have to wait for someone else to help.

    Just, that makes NO sense to me. If you are unsure when columns are added to a table, then you have lost ALL control over your data model. You can possibly write, test, or deploy code that uses tables and columns without knowing which columns a table has.

    You should just use separate scripts for these tables of problem so that if the script didn't it won't affect other scripts.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Portege R400 screen problems when wireless is enabled

    Hello I'm a big fan of my R400, but he has a problem, I can't get rid of that. When I use it via evry 5 minutes wireless the done screen a total refresh of each window to reset the mouse in the middle of the screen. If I have a few windows open, it c

  • Upgrade CPU HP Pavilion g6-1b87cl

    I would like to know what cpu upgrades I can do on this laptop? I currently have the 2.13 GHz Intel Pentium Processor P6200. I would go with the Intel Core i5 i5 - 480 M SLC27 processor. I currently have the card Intel(r) HD Graphics, but I don't kno

  • Why my W500 livelihoods get a window 4.6 experience even if I do the same step as you guys?

    Hi all I have a W500, but he has only a 4.6 window experience. I read the topic and follow the steps, but without hope. I put my High Performance video card in the Panel ATI already I can see that my video card FireGL V5700, video BIOS 2008/10/15 My

  • RAM not work DDR3L 4 GB HP Pavilion 15 - n245se

    Hello, I was using my laptop computer and all the sudden he shutted down. Then I tried to open the screen is black, but the laptop is running. After watching a lot of videos on youtube, I discovered one of my Rams does not. Then I took it off. The la

  • (Emergency) For a bigger hard drive replacement.

    Hello I am the owner of a HP Pavilion all-in - One MS210LA desktop PC It was delivered with a 320 GB hard drive, which recently failed. I wasn't able to do all the disks dérirez, but I managed to save most of my important work on an external hard dri