analyze the differences between the 2 tables

Similar Questions

• Difference between FA_CATEGORIES_B and table FA_CATEGORIES_TL

  Hi all 2
  
  Anyone know what what is difference between sub reference tables
  
  FA_CATEGORIES_B
  FA_CATEGORIES_TL
  FA_CATEGORY_BOOKS
  FA_CATEGORY_BOOK_DEFAULTS
  
  
  Kind regards
  
  
  Lavenu

  Hello.

  FA_CATEGORIES_B stores information about your asset classes. This
  table provides information by default when you add an asset. The
  amortization schedule does not use this information to calculate
  depreciation.

  FA_CATEGORIES_TL contains the translated column from the base FA_CATEGORIES_B description
  Table complies with multlLingual.
  FA_CATEGORY_BOOKS provides accounts of cost and of the reserves for a book
  and the combination of the category.
  The form of the asset classes inserts a line in the following table for each book
  in which you use an asset class. For example, if you set one
  category for three of depreciation, active Oracle inserts three
  rows in this table.

  FA_CATEGORY_BOOK_DEFAULTS provides values default to the
  rules of depreciation when you add an asset.
  The form of the asset classes inserts a line in this table
  for each class of assets, amortization and date
  place in the range of service for which you are setting up the category.

  Octavio

• Difference between an XMLType table and one table with an XMLType column?

  Hi all
  
  Still trying to get my mind on all that XML stuff.
  
  Can someone explain briefly the difference between:

  create table this_is_xmltype_tab of xmltype;

  and

  create table this_is_tab_w_xmltpe_col(id number, document xmltype);

  What are the advantages and disadvantages of each solution? How are they really different?
  
  Thank you
  
  -Mark

  Sorry Mark, as far as I know it is not a real difference despite the fact that you can use the table with the column (ID), probably more effective for document-focused while driving the query via the ID column and anything else I can think off automatically about XMLType contra XMLType table columns is that (as far as I KNOW) you can not use a column of XMLType to shred the data into it via WebDAV o FTP. But then again I never really tried to do an XMLType column-based. Alternatives, for example, a binary XML column begins with a column of $ sys_nc_oid which is indexed, so in principle you shouldn't need an ID (number) column that has an index (a read also on http://www.liberidu.com/blog/?p=494). If there has been non-null that you could use this index for document oriented applications.

• The differences between CAT and table TAB

  1. What is the difference between cat and TAB?
  2. why TAB does not exist in dict?
  3. that the same situation for cat and TAB?
  
  Thanks a lot for your answer kindly.
  
  sys@ORCL > cat desc
  Name Null? Type
  ----------------------------------------------------- -------- ------------------------------------
  TABLE_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (30)
  TABLE_TYPE VARCHAR2 (11)
  
  sys@ORCL > tab desc
  Name Null? Type
  ----------------------------------------------------- -------- ------------------------------------
  TNOM NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (30)
  TABTYPE VARCHAR2 (7)
  NUMBER OF CLUSTERID
  
  sys@ORCL > select * dict where table_name = "CAT";
  
  TABLE_NAME COMMENTS
  ---------- -----------------------------------
  Synonym of cat for USER_CATALOG
  
  
  sys@ORCL > select * dict where table_name = 'USER_CATALOG ';
  
  TABLE_NAME COMMENTS
  -------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
  USER_CATALOG Tables, views, synonyms, and sequences belonged to the user

  You've posted enough to know that, for each position, you will need to provide your version of Oracle 4-digit (SELECT * FROM V$ VERSION)
  >
  1. What is the difference between cat and TAB?
  2. why TAB does not exist in dict?
  3. that the same situation for cat and TAB?
  >
  1, 2, 3 - TAB has been deprecated then don't use it.

  Definitioni of base for those located in the reference database
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b28320/statviews_2127.htm#sthref1535
  >
  CAT

  CAT is a synonym for USER_CATALOG.
  . . .
  USER_CATALOG

  USER_CATALOG lists all the tables, views, clusters, synonyms, and sequences belonged to the current user. Its columns are the same as those of "ALL_CATALOG".
  . . .
  DICT

  DICT is a DICTIONARY.
  . . .
  DICTIONARY

  DICTIONARY contains descriptions of data dictionary tables and views.
  . . .
  TAB

  TAB is included for compatibility. Oracle recommends that you do not use this view.
  >
  TAB has been deprecated. He looks like the cat because it shows the USER objects, but it does not show the sequences, like the cat.

  If you look at the source code for the views TAB and USER_CATALOG you can see the differences. This code is copyrighted by Oracle Corporation, all rights reserved.

  /* Formatted on 1/1/2013 8:50:07 AM (QP5 v5.115.810.9015) */
  CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW SYS.TAB
  (
     TNAME,
     TABTYPE,
     CLUSTERID
  )
  AS
     SELECT   o.name, DECODE (o.type#,
                              2,
                              'TABLE',
                              3,
                              'CLUSTER',
                              4,
                              'VIEW',
                              5,
                              'SYNONYM'), t.tab#
       FROM   sys.tab$ t, sys."_CURRENT_EDITION_OBJ" o
      WHERE       o.owner# = USERENV ('SCHEMAID')
              AND o.type# >= 2
              AND o.type# <= 5
              AND o.linkname IS NULL
              AND o.obj# = t.obj#(+);
  . . .
  /* Formatted on 1/1/2013 8:54:45 AM (QP5 v5.115.810.9015) */
  CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW SYS.USER_CATALOG
  (
     TABLE_NAME,
     TABLE_TYPE
  )
  AS
     SELECT   o.name,
              DECODE (o.type#,
                      0, 'NEXT OBJECT',
                      1, 'INDEX',
                      2, 'TABLE',
                      3, 'CLUSTER',
                      4, 'VIEW',
                      5, 'SYNONYM',
                      6, 'SEQUENCE',
                      'UNDEFINED')
       FROM   sys."_CURRENT_EDITION_OBJ" o
      WHERE   o.owner# = USERENV ('SCHEMAID')
              AND ( (o.type# IN (4, 5, 6))
                   OR (o.type# = 2 /* tables, excluding iot - overflow and nested tables */
                       AND NOT EXISTS
                             (SELECT   NULL
                                FROM   sys.tab$ t
                               WHERE   t.obj# = o.obj#
                                       AND (BITAND (t.property, 512) = 512
                                            OR BITAND (t.property, 8192) = 8192))))
              AND o.linkname IS NULL;
  

• Difference between a logical table duplication and creation of an alias

  Hello
  
  I have a question of basic theory.
  
  What is the difference between creating a duplicate in the MDB layer and creation of an alias physical and important in the MDB layer.
  
  I want to join the physical object to two facts and import that into MDB layer and duplicate the object logic and create an individual join for each of the entities in the MDB layer. This kind of structure will have any negative impact on the final result.
  
  Any suggestions on this will be greatly appreciated.
  
  Thank you
  
  This is for OBIEE10g

  FYI; Here it is my comments

  Assuming the column rename in MDB for the same physical object is supplied to this kind of approach ;)

  I suggest go by best practice or how consistency.
  A logical table should have a ref source of physical layer.
  Logic or presentation column should have at least one physical source directly or indirectly (buy from the other logical column)

  Would it help to have their own hiearchies dimension for each logical table, just in case you duplicate an existing logical table for which there is a dimension existing in the model you get consistency error.

  When you joined the MDB you may need to set the join by foreign key (which have a condition) in MDB instead of complex join logical layer.

• analyze the table & dbms_stats (chained lines)

  Hi guys,.
  
  Understand that dbms_stats collect statistics on (chained rows).
  To get chained lines, we can use one of the below:
  1. analyze the < table_name > table list chained rows;
  2 analyze the table < table_name > statistical calculation;
  
  the first lists the information chained rows in the CHAINED_ROWS table.
  the 2nd is best so that the information of chain_cnt are fulfilled in dba_tables. I can easily get the percentage of channel count by diviiding with the num_rows (for example if you need to list tables with 10 > string cnt percentage it would be easy).
  
  Right now, I'm leaving the need to collect statistics for night work by default oracle (who gather for table with variation in percentage of stale or > 10)... However, come together to string cnts.
  Can advise how can I get the string cnt without risking my existing services?
  
  And also will analyze statistics of table < table_name > estimate; replace my existing histograms?
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: Chewy on March 4, 2013 02:35

  Can advise how can I get the string cnt without risking my existing services?

  analyze the table list chained rows in ;

  Select owner_name, table_name, count (*) from the group by owner_name, table_name;

  CHAINED_ROWS_TABLE must be created with UTLCHAIN. SQL script

• Analyze the table after loading

  Hi gurus
  
  Let me know how we analyze the target table after loading to finish using an interface.
  
  Concerning
  Sree

  Hi Mary,

  There are two ways to do it,

  1. customize your IKM own target of Analyze table step added.

  2. create a procedure of ODI which will analyze the target table and can be called after the success of the loading data.

  Thank you
  Guru

• Ordinary table from the temporary table vs

  Hello
  What is the difference between a temporary table and a regular ODI table.
  
  I created a temporary table mapping. Works very well. Now, I added the column in the mapping. To make it work, I have to drop the temporary table that created starting from my previous run or add the column in the temporary table. So I was wondering what is the difference between temp and a regular table in terms of maintenance.
  
  How can I make adding new dynamic columns.
  
  -app

  Just to add to what others have said.

  (Temporary interface or yellow Interface) to create (Temp Table or Table Stagging)
  -------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------

  This method is used to create a temporary Table or Stagging table so that you can export your data before the load in the main target.
  Also its always good practice to create them in the scheme of work (where $ tables are created), except if you required in your database schema.
  This interface are marked by yellow color
  Also these Interface can be dragged directly into all other Interfaces.

  The main reason why they are not removed or delete which is then we cannot call in the following Interface to load the target.

  tables of $
  ------------

  Here's the ODI tables it creates before loading the data into the target as ODI works with ELT concept where his charges into a temporary table (C$, I$, $ J etc.). ODI after loading data in these tables $ can do the necessary transformation and finally load into the target table.
  Once the loaded data to compeltely there ' won't be any use of these tables so they let down, even if you have not deleted by havingthe option
  Delete temporary objects - not in LKM and IKM. Generally used for debugging, but once you have finished debugging, make sure that you return Yes, ODI else will not remove these tables of $.

  How can I make adding new dynamic columns.

  Although I see no reason to drop the temporary table or tables intermediaries. Its good to drop in the database and run your IKM, but again please find a way to do it using revenge for your reference.

  Step 1 - create a copy of your IKM

  Step 2 - Add another command called Drop Target Table and use the following code

   Drop table  <%=snpRef.getTable("L", "TARG_NAME", "A")%> 
  

  Move it before you create the target Table.

  Step 3. Added an option - Drop Table target, so that you can specify whether to drop or not. Go on command and option and instead of always run, check the Drop target only Table option.

  That way if you do not want to delete the target table, it used to other specify Yes.

  I hope this helps.

• difference between icx_sessions and fnd_logins

  Hello

  Usually we use both fnd_logins and icx_sessions tables to find the number of users connected to the application as well as fnd_user.

  What is the main difference between these two tables?

  -Thank you

  Hello

  You are right.

  Kind regards

  Bashar

• difference between aq$ wf_notification_out and wf_notification_out

  Hello

  What is the difference between above two tables?

  The two stores data on outbound notifications, but I can't the two tables have different column names.

  -Thank you

  OK - pl see the code behind the view - he joined 3 items, one of them being WF_NOTIFICATION_OUT of table

• What is the difference between the type of table and view?

  Hello world.

  What is the difference between the type of view and table that we can set using SQL statement such as: "tab type is table of...» » ?

  A view is a stored query.

  An array type is a construction of PL/SQL.

  Both are documented:

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e10897/schema.htm#ADMQS0841

  Management of schema objects

• What is the difference between associative arrays and nested tables?

  Hello
  What is the difference between associative arrays and nested tables?
  
  nested tables cannot be indexed by other than pls_integer and unlike nested tables table associative cananot be declared at the schema level.
  
  is there any other difference set apart from the diff above 2?

  user13710379 wrote:
  What is the difference between associative arrays and nested tables?

  Name-value pairs (associative) against a list of values (table standard/nested table).

  nested tables cannot be indexed by other than pls_integer

  They are not "indexed" the way in which an associative array is indexed. A standard table is referenced by the position of the cell in the table. This position is essentially the offset of the memory of the cell from the start address of the table.

  Can not solve a cell in an associative array directly via a memory offset index. You place a cell reference value it by his 'name' (a search in the linked list/hash table).

  The following example shows the difference between the pairs of name / value and a list of core values.

  SQL> declare
    2          --// associative arrays are NAME-VALUE pairs
    3          type TArr1 is table of varchar2(10) index by pls_integer;
    4          type TArr2 is table of varchar2(10) index by varchar2(10);
    5
    6          arr1    TArr1;
    7          arr2    TArr2;
    8  begin
    9          arr1(100) := '1st entry';
   10          arr1(1) := '2nd entry';
   11          arr1(5) := '3rd entry';
   12
   13          arr2('john') := 'New York';
   14          arr2('jane') := 'Paris';
   15          arr2('jack') := 'London';
   16
   17  end;
   18  /
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL>
  SQL>
  SQL> declare
    2          --// standard arrays are lists
    3          type TArr3 is table of varchar2(10);
    4          type TArr4 is table of number;
    5
    6          arr3    TArr3;
    7          arr4    TArr4;
    8  begin
    9          arr3 := new TArr3( '1st entry', '2nd entry', '3rd entry' );
   10
   11          arr4 := new TArr4( 100, 1, 5 );
   12  end;
   13  /
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> 
  

• The most elegant way to get the difference between two tables - not least!

  Hello
  
  
  Simplified example of what I'm trying to achieve - I have two tables ORIGINAL and REVISED.
  
  
  My aim is to compare the two, such as; -
  
  
  When there is data in the two tables I get the difference between the Budget column, and if there is no difference, so I don't want no lines.
  
  When data exists in the ORIGINAL, but not in review, I want to the inverse of the current value of the Budget column.
  
  Where the data exist in REVISED I want the REVISED value.
  
  I can see how I can do this, see below, but is there a more elegant solution?
  
  
  
  
  Data for the ORIGINAL table
  

  select '801040' entity, '2186' expense_type, 234000 budget
  from dual
  union all
  select '801040' entity, '3001' expense_type, 1000 budget
  from dual
  union all
  select '801040' entity, 'P132' expense_type, 34000 budget
  from dual
  union all
  select '801040' entity, 'P135' expense_type, 43000 budget
  from dual

  Data for the REVISED table
  

  select '801040' entity, '2186' expense_type, 235000 budget
  from dual
  union all
  select '801040' entity, 'P132' expense_type, 34000 budget
  from dual
  union all
  select '801040' entity, 'P139' expense_type, 56000 budget
  from dual

  Desired output
  
  
  
  ENTITY EXPENSE_TYPE DIFFERENCE
  ------ ------------ ----------
  801040 2186 1000
  801040 3001-1000
  801040 P135-43000
  801040 P139 56000
  
  5 selected lines.
  
  
  
  Code current to achieve this, is there a better way?
  

  select original.entity
  ,      original.expense_type
  ,       (nvl(revised.budget,0) - original.budget) as difference
  from   original
  ,      revised
  where  original.entity = revised.entity(+)
  and    original.expense_type = revised.expense_type(+)
  and   (nvl(revised.budget,0) - original.budget) != 0
  union all
  select  revised.entity
  ,       revised.expense_type
  ,       revised.budget as difference
  from   revised
  where  not exists
  (select 'x'
  from   original
  where  original.entity = revised.entity
  and    original.expense_type = revised.expense_type)
  and    revised.budget != 0

  Thanks a lot for your comments,.
  
  
  Robert.
  
  Published by: Robert Angel on January 17, 2012 03:31 to change is not equal to! = - Thanks for the heads up

  SQL> with original
    2  as
    3  (
    4    select '801040' entity, '2186' expense_type, 234000 budget
    5    from dual
    6    union all
    7    select '801040' entity, '3001' expense_type, 1000 budget
    8    from dual
    9    union all
   10    select '801040' entity, 'P132' expense_type, 34000 budget
   11    from dual
   12    union all
   13    select '801040' entity, 'P135' expense_type, 43000 budget
   14    from dual
   15  )
   16  , revised
   17  as
   18  (
   19    select '801040' entity, '2186' expense_type, 235000 budget
   20    from dual
   21    union all
   22    select '801040' entity, 'P132' expense_type, 34000 budget
   23    from dual
   24    union all
   25    select '801040' entity, 'P139' expense_type, 56000 budget
   26    from dual
   27  )
   28  select *
   29    from (
   30          select nvl(o.entity, r.entity) entity,
   31                 nvl(o.expense_type, r.expense_type) expense_type,
   32                 nvl(r.budget,0) - nvl(o.budget,0) budget
   33            from original o
   34            full join revised r
   35              on o.entity = r.entity
   36             and o.expense_type = r.expense_type
   37         )
   38   where budget <> 0
   39  /
  
  ENTITY EXPE     BUDGET
  ------ ---- ----------
  801040 2186       1000
  801040 P135     -43000
  801040 3001      -1000
  801040 P139      56000
  
  SQL>
  

• What is the difference between a table and a subform?

  What is the difference between a table and a subform in LC forms? Please post your answers about the merits and demerits of using subforms instead of tables.

  Hello

  a table is simply a set of subforms with a particular role.

  It is easier to handle the tables if they must be dynamic (add or remove lines, show or hide lines when page breaks appear etc..).

  And Designers UI has some dialogue prepared in the object palette to simplify the settings of the tables.

  For subforms, dialog boxes are more frequent, so you have yourself a little more script.

  But at least you can do everything with subforms as you can do with tables.

  The only one who is not very good with tables we work when you wrap arrays in other tables.

• difference between the external and UTL_File utility table

  can someone clearly explain me what is the difference between the external and UTL_File utility table? and what case to use utl_file and external table?
  
  
  
  Thanks in advance.

  Hello
  To get a clear idea on the check of the external table link below

  http://www.orafaq.com/node/848