AR lack commitment Transaction
11.5.10Trying to setup within the AR transaction types, when I select class engagement is not on the list. I chargeback, credit notes, debit memo, deposit, guarantee, but commitment is missing.
Y at - it something wrong with my ar configuration or do I have to activate the class somewhere that I'm not aware of any action.
Also, how you change the default in AR country when setting up of new customers and address of country keeps failing in the USA, I wanted to its default value in the UK.
Hello
Default country is set in "Receivables--> Setup--> System--> System Options" on the tab "miscellaneous". I don't know if you can change this value once the system options are defined for an operating unit.
You can also replace this value at the level of responsibility/user setting profile country default options * in System Manager > profile > system.
Kind regards.
Tags: Oracle Applications
Similar Questions
-
Hello
I need to know if there is an Oracle query that allows me to view current (uncommitted) transactions
I use this query:
select t.start_time,s.sid,s.serial#,s.username,s.status, s.sql_id from v$transaction t, v$session s where s.saddr = t.ses_addr
BUT I would like to know if there are uncommitted 3 days ago transactions.Thanks in advance!
ground. Beach wrote:
uncommitted transaction is an oxymoron.
A transaction exist only after that VALIDATION was made.
Huh? I think you have it backwards.
A transaction exists only BEFORE a commit / rollback was granted and AFTER the first statement. So "no committed transaction is actually"redundant".
Transactions - 11g Release 2 (11.2)
Beginning of a Transaction
A transaction begins when the first executable SQL statement is encountered. An executable SQL statement is a SQL statement that generates calls to a database instance, including DML and DDL statements and the
SET TRANSACTIONstatement.. . .
End of a Transaction
A transaction ends when one of the following actions occurs:
- A user a issues
COMMITorROLLBACKstatement without aSAVEPOINTarticle.In a commit, a user explicitly or implicitly requested that the changes as part of the operation be made permanent. Changes made by the transaction are permanent and visible to other users until a transaction is committed. The transaction is shown in Figure 10-1 ends with a commit.
- A user executes a DDL command such as
CREATE,DROP,RENAME, orALTER.The questions implicitly database
COMMITstatement before and after every DDL statement. If the current transaction contains DML, then Oracle Database first valid instructions the transaction executes and commits the DDL statement in a new single statement transaction. - A user normally leaves most of the utilities of Oracle database and tools, causing the transaction implicitly committed being. The validation behavior when a user disconnects is application dependent and configurable.
Note:
Applications should always explicitly commit or cancel transactions before the end of the program.
- A client process terminates abnormally, causing to be implicitly rolled using metadata stored in the operating table and the rollback of the transaction segment.
After the end of a transaction, the next executable SQL statement automatically starts the following transaction.
- A user a issues
-
Hi all
I need to understand how transactions are structured? Is it change database data block (block of modified vector) or transactions committed by the application (e. g: insert into emp values (1, "uno", "India"))
Also during the replication, if changed block is transferred from the slave master or slave so reecoutee Transaction.
Concerning
Well, I'm not sure that the other guys say exactly by "replication transactions only" but that's basically what TimesTen. Only the information directly to apply properly committed transactions are propagated by replication. Any other information in the transaction logs, which is not relevant is not propagated.
Just FYI, the latest version of TimesTen (11.2.2.8.x) using parallel replication with the optimization of application no validation command enabled (ReplicationApplyOrdering = 2) is able to maintain a flow of replication of database changes more 600 000 (updates of individual line for example) per second between a pair of servers Intel based products. I would describe as personally as 'very fast '. I'm not aware of any other product that can match this level of throughput of replication (but maybe there is something out there that can - I'd be interested to hear about it).
Kind regards
Chris
-
Local transaction support when BPEL calls JCA adapter
Hi all
I've implemented a BPEL invoke process consisting of several activities to my (personalized) JCA resource adapter that connects to an environmental impact study.
My concern is to support local transactions. Here are a few snippets describing what I've done so far.
Declare the support of transactions at the time of deployment (ra.xml)
Implementation of interface ManagedConnection class<transaction-support>LocalTransaction</transaction-support>
Implementation of interface LocalTransaction classpublic class MyManagedConnection implements ManagedConnection { ... public XAResource getXAResource() throws ResourceException { throw new NotSupportedException("XA Transactions not supported"); } public LocalTransaction getLocalTransaction() throws ResourceException { return new MyLocalTransaction(this); } public void sendTheEvent(int eventType, Object connectionHandle) { ConnectionEvent event = new ConnectionEvent(this, eventType); if (connectionHandle != null) { event.setConnectionHandle(connectionHandle); } ConnectionEventListener listener = getEventListener(); switch (eventType) { case ConnectionEvent.CONNECTION_CLOSED: listener.connectionClosed(event); break; case ConnectionEvent.LOCAL_TRANSACTION_STARTED: listener.localTransactionStarted(event); break; case ConnectionEvent.LOCAL_TRANSACTION_COMMITTED: listener.localTransactionCommitted(event); break; case ConnectionEvent.LOCAL_TRANSACTION_ROLLEDBACK: listener.localTransactionRolledback(event); break; case ConnectionEvent.CONNECTION_ERROR_OCCURRED: listener.connectionErrorOccurred(event); break; default: break; } } }
Completion of process BPEL Uppon, MyLocalTransaction.commit () is called. However, localTransactionCommitted (event) fails and I get the following error:public class MyLocalTransaction implements javax.resource.spi.LocalTransaction { private MyManagedConnection mc = null; public MyLocalTransaction(MyManagedConnection mc) { this.mc = mc; } @Overide public void begin() throws ResourceException { mc.sendTheEvent(ConnectionEvent.LOCAL_TRANSACTION_STARTED, mc); } @Override public void commit() throws ResourceException { eis.commit(); //eis specific method mc.sendTheEvent(ConnectionEvent.LOCAL_TRANSACTION_COMMITTED, mc); } @Override public void rollback() throws ResourceException { eis.rollback(); //eis specific method mc.sendTheEvent(ConnectionEvent.LOCAL_TRANSACTION_ROLLEDBACK, mc); } }
Could someone give me a few directions to proceed?Error committing transaction:; nested exception is: weblogic.transaction.nonxa.NonXAException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: [Connector:199175]This ManagedConnection is managed by container for its transactional behavior and has been enlisted to JTA transaction by container; application/adapter must not call the local transaction begin/commit/rollback API. Reject event LOCAL_TRANSACTION_COMMITTED from adapter.
My current setup consists of:
1 oracle SOA Suite / JDeveoper 11 g (11.1.1.4.0),.
2 WebLogic Server 10.3.4
Thank you for your time,
GeorgeThe important fact is that BPEL will always be in a transaction... Apparently, your card's participation in the operation of BPEL JTA (rather than create a new one)... Thus, when you try to send a commit local, it will fail because "Ce ManagedConnection is handled by container for its transactional behavior and has been joined to the JTA transaction per container.
So you have to see which is best for your case, to participate in the operation of BPEL and let BPEL commit the transaction for you, or somehow put your JCA adapter in a transaction context different from that of the BPEL one...
I hope this helps...
See you soon,.
Vlad -
Transaction validation error in Stored Proc call - prev solns does not
Hi all
Our process calls a DB adapter to retrieve the answer from the table to our application via a call to stored procedure, but in the face of the slot issue. Its a synchronous process. The stored procedure is present inside the package and call the stored procedure using this Package.
What we did is created a DB of type XA data source and tried to call the stored Proc but it appeared a problem "ORA-24777: the use of the non-migratable unauthorized link database ' and therefore, according to this thread DB links in stored proc call into the adapter DB 11 G SOA , we have changed the type of non - XA data source.
While we do this, we could see that stored procedure is called and the answer is not in the payload to answer within the track of the flow. But the instance is get failed and the error is "error committing transaction:; nested exception is: javax.transaction.xa.XAException: JDBC driver does not support the XA, so may not be a participant in the validation in two phases. To force this participation, set the attribute GlobalTransactionsProtocol (recommended) LoggingLastResource or EmulateTwoPhaseCommit for the Data Source. »
We have tried properties to support overall transaction as imitate a validation phase, two phase commit and logging last resource but error remains the same.
Database from where we get the answer is a version of "Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit Production". The link of database error is due even if we connect to the Oracle database?
Please could you tell me solutions for this problem.
Thanks in advance.You use a Non - XA because it means (among others) that the issue of validation can be handle by the DB as well.
The property to imitate two Phase imitating the transaction XA in this way, it allows you to manage a transaction local db.
You can stay with XA connection, but then you have to use 'pragma AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION' in your procedure.Enter the following link to find the explanation on your questions:
http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E15523_01/integration.1111/e10231/adptr_db.htm#BGBIHCIJArik
-
Corrupt Windows Server system files
I have problems with IE11 crashing for a Windows Web Server 2008 R2 SP1. I determined that the problem is caused by the BONES being corrupted system files. Is there a way to repair these system without wiping files and reload the operating system? If so, how to accomplish this? A system restore may not be an option. I would also avoid just using another browser.
Newspapers of SFC:
2015-12-14 16:17:23, info CSI 00000038 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "RSMGRSTR.dll" brmfcmf.inf, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:24 {12}] "driverUpdate", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:17:23, CSI Info 0000003a [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "RSMGRSTR.dll" brmfcwia.inf, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:24 {12}] "driverUpdate", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:17:24, CSI Info 0000003 c [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "RSMGRSTR.dll" brmfcmf.inf, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:24 {12}] "driverUpdate", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:17:24, info CSI 0000003d [SR] this element is referenced by [l:182 {91}] "Microsoft-Windows-Server-pilots-package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.INF_brmfcmf '.
2015-12-14 16:17:25, CSI Info 0000003f [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "RSMGRSTR.dll" brmfcwia.inf, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:24 {12}] "driverUpdate", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
' 2015-12-14 16:17:25, info CSI 00000040 [SR] this element is referenced by [l:192{96}]"Microsoft-Windows-WIA-Server-Drivers-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.1.7601.17514.INF_brmfcwia. '
2015-12-14 16:17:33, info CSI 00000056 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:22 {11}] "lsi_sas.inf" lsi_sas.inf, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:24 {12}] "driverUpdate", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:17:34, Info CSI 00000058 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:22 {11}] "lsi_sas.inf" lsi_sas.inf, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:24 {12}] "driverUpdate", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:17:34, Info CSI 00000059 [SR] this element is referenced by [l:182 {91}] "Microsoft-Windows-Common-pilots-package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.INF_lsi_sas '.
2015-12-14 16:18, info CSI 00000079 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "comsetup.dll" Microsoft-Windows-COM-ComPlus-Setup, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:18:03, CSI Info 0000007f [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "comsetup.dll" Microsoft-Windows-COM-ComPlus-Setup, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:18:03, info CSI 00000080 [SR] this element is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:18:03, info CSI 00000082 [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:58 {29}] '------? \C:\Windows\System32\Setup"\[l:24{12}]"Comsetup.dll '; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:18:29, 000000 b 7 CSI Info [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "rekeywiz.exe" Microsoft-Windows-efs-rekeywiz, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:18:33, 000000 b 9 CSI Info [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "rekeywiz.exe" Microsoft-Windows-efs-rekeywiz, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:18:33, 000000ba CSI Info [SR] this element is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:18:33, 000000bd CSI Info [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:46 {23}] '------? \C:\Windows\System32"\[l:24{12}]"rekeywiz.exe '; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:18:43, 000000e8 CSI Info [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:22 {11}] "fms.dll.mui" Microsoft-Windows-fonts - FMS.Resources, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture = [l:10 {5}] "ru - RU", VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:10 {5}] "win32", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:18:43, 000000ea CSI Info [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:22 {11}] "fms.dll.mui" Microsoft-Windows-fonts - FMS.Resources, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture = [l:10 {5}] "sk - SK", VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:10 {5}] "win32", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:18:52, 000000ec CSI Info [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:18 {9}] "taile.ttf" Microsoft-Windows-font-TrueType-Tai_Le, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:18:52, 000000ee CSI Info [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "taileb.ttf" Microsoft-Windows-font-TrueType-Tai_Le, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:18:52, 000000f0 CSI Info [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:18 {9}] "taile.ttf" Microsoft-Windows-font-TrueType-Tai_Le, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:18:52, 000000f1 CSI Info [SR] this element is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:18:52, 000000f3 CSI Info [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "taileb.ttf" Microsoft-Windows-font-TrueType-Tai_Le, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:18:52, 000000f4 CSI Info [SR] this element is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:18:52, 000000f7 CSI Info [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:40 {20}] '------? \C:\Windows\Fonts"\[l:18{9}]"taile.ttf '; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:18:53, 000000f9 CSI Info [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:22 {11}] "fms.dll.mui" Microsoft-Windows-fonts - FMS.Resources, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture = [l:10 {5}] "sk - SK", VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:10 {5}] "win32", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:18:53, 000000fa CSI Info [SR] this element is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:18:53, CSI Info 000000 fc [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:58 {29}] '------? \C:\Windows\System32\sk-SK"\[l:22{11}]"FMS.dll.MUI '; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:18:57, 000000fe CSI Info [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:22 {11}] "fms.dll.mui" Microsoft-Windows-fonts - FMS.Resources, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture = [l:10 {5}] "ru - RU", VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:10 {5}] "win32", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:18:57, CSI Info 000000ff [SR] this element is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:18:57, info CSI 00000101 [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:58 {29}] '------? \C:\Windows\System32\ru-ru"\[l:22{11}]"FMS.dll.MUI '; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:20:11, CSI Info 0000015b [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "msadrh15.dll" Microsoft-Windows-Microsoft-Data-Access-Components-(MDAC)-ADO15-RH, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:20:13, CSI Info 0000015 d [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "msadrh15.dll" Microsoft-Windows-Microsoft-Data-Access-Components-(MDAC)-ADO15-RH, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:20:13, CSI Info 0000015e [SR] this element is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:20:13, info CSI 00000161 [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:88 {44}] '------? \C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\ado"\[l:24{12}]"msadrh15.dll; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:20:14, info CSI 00000167 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "msadco.dll" Microsoft-Windows-Microsoft-Data-Access-Components-(MDAC)-RDS-DataControl-Dll, Version = 6.1.7601.17857, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:20:20, info CSI 00000169 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "msadco.dll" Microsoft-Windows-Microsoft-Data-Access-Components-(MDAC)-RDS-DataControl-Dll, Version = 6.1.7601.17857, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:20:20, CSI Info 0000016 [SR] a the item is referenced by [l:156 {78}] "' Package_7_for_KB2698365 ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.1.2.2698365 - 62_neutral_GDR" "
2015-12-14 16:20:20, CSI Info 0000016 d [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:92 {46}] '------? \C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\msadc"\[l:20{10}]"msadco.dll; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:27:54, info CSI 00000344 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "RSMGRSTR.dll" brmfcmf.inf, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:24 {12}] "driverUpdate", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000346 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "RSMGRSTR.dll" brmfcwia.inf, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:24 {12}] "driverUpdate", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000348 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:22 {11}] "lsi_sas.inf" lsi_sas.inf, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:24 {12}] "driverUpdate", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI Info 0000034a [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "comsetup.dll" Microsoft-Windows-COM-ComPlus-Setup, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI Info 0000034 c [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "rekeywiz.exe" Microsoft-Windows-efs-rekeywiz, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI Info 0000034e [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:18 {9}] "taile.ttf" Microsoft-Windows-font-TrueType-Tai_Le, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000350 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "taileb.ttf" Microsoft-Windows-font-TrueType-Tai_Le, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000352 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:22 {11}] "fms.dll.mui" Microsoft-Windows-fonts - FMS.Resources, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture = [l:10 {5}] "sk - SK", VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:10 {5}] "win32", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000354 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:22 {11}] "fms.dll.mui" Microsoft-Windows-fonts - FMS.Resources, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture = [l:10 {5}] "ru - RU", VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:10 {5}] "win32", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000356 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "msadrh15.dll" Microsoft-Windows-Microsoft-Data-Access-Components-(MDAC)-ADO15-RH, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000358 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "msadco.dll" Microsoft-Windows-Microsoft-Data-Access-Components-(MDAC)-RDS-DataControl-Dll, Version = 6.1.7601.17857, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI Info 0000035a [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "msadco.dll" Microsoft-Windows-Microsoft-Data-Access-Components-(MDAC)-RDS-DataControl-Dll, Version = 6.1.7601.17857, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI Info 0000035b [SR] this element is referenced by [l:156 {78}] "' Package_7_for_KB2698365 ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.1.2.2698365 - 62_neutral_GDR" "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI Info 0000035e [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:92 {46}] '------? \C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\msadc"\[l:20{10}]"msadco.dll; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000360 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:18 {9}] "taile.ttf" Microsoft-Windows-font-TrueType-Tai_Le, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000361 [SR] this element is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000363 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "taileb.ttf" Microsoft-Windows-font-TrueType-Tai_Le, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000364 [SR] this element is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000367 [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:40 {20}] '------? \C:\Windows\Fonts"\[l:18{9}]"taile.ttf '; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000369 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:22 {11}] "fms.dll.mui" Microsoft-Windows-fonts - FMS.Resources, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture = [l:10 {5}] "sk - SK", VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:10 {5}] "win32", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI Info 0000036 [SR] a the item is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI Info 0000036 c [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:58 {29}] '------? \C:\Windows\System32\sk-SK"\[l:22{11}]"FMS.dll.MUI '; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI Info 0000036e [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "comsetup.dll" Microsoft-Windows-COM-ComPlus-Setup, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI 0000036f [SR] Info this item is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000371 [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:58 {29}] '------? \C:\Windows\System32\Setup"\[l:24{12}]"Comsetup.dll '; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000373 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "RSMGRSTR.dll" brmfcmf.inf, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:24 {12}] "driverUpdate", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000374 [SR] this element is referenced by [l:182 {91}] "Microsoft-Windows-Server-pilots-package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.INF_brmfcmf '.
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000376 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "RSMGRSTR.dll" brmfcwia.inf, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:24 {12}] "driverUpdate", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
' 2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000377 [SR] this element is referenced by [l:192{96}]"Microsoft-Windows-WIA-Server-Drivers-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.1.7601.17514.INF_brmfcwia. '
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000379 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "rekeywiz.exe" Microsoft-Windows-efs-rekeywiz, Version 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 = (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI 0000037 [SR] has Info the item is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:27:55, Info CSI 0000037 [SR] d could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:46 {23}] '------? \C:\Windows\System32"\[l:24{12}]"rekeywiz.exe '; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI Info 0000037f [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:22 {11}] "lsi_sas.inf" lsi_sas.inf, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), the Culture neutral, VersionScope is 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:24 {12}] "driverUpdate", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000380 [SR] this element is referenced by [l:182 {91}] "Microsoft-Windows-Common-pilots-package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.INF_lsi_sas '.
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000382 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:22 {11}] "fms.dll.mui" Microsoft-Windows-fonts - FMS.Resources, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture = [l:10 {5}] "ru - RU", VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, Type = [l:10 {5}] "win32", TypeName neutral, PublicKey neutral in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000383 [SR] this element is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000385 [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:58 {29}] '------? \C:\Windows\System32\ru-ru"\[l:22{11}]"FMS.dll.MUI '; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000387 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:24 {12}] "msadrh15.dll" Microsoft-Windows-Microsoft-Data-Access-Components-(MDAC)-ADO15-RH, Version = 6.1.7600.16385, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_AMD64 (9), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000388 [SR] this element is referenced by [l:202 {101}] "Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ amd64 ~ ~ 6.1.7601.17514.WindowsFoundationDelivery '.
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI Info 0000038b [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:88 {44}] '------? \C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\ado"\[l:24{12}]"msadrh15.dll; source file in the store is also corrupted
2015-12-14 16:27:55, CSI Info 0000038 d [SR] repair complete
2015-12-14 16:27:55, Info CSI 0000038e [SR] Committing transaction
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000392 [SR] check and complete repair operation. All of the files and registry keys listed in this operation were repaired successfully
Hello
Post your question in the TechNet Server Forums, as your question kindly is beyond the scope of these Forums.
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer
And when you repost, inform about the bottom line:
2015-12-14 16:27:55, info CSI 00000392 [SR] check and complete repair operation. All files and registry listed under this operation keys were repaired successfully
See you soon.
-
bussiness of vista os install all windows updates I ran sfc/scannow returned result 00000216 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "config.sys" Microsoft-Windows-NTVDM-System32, Version = 6.0.6002.18005, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_INTEL (0), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store " hash mismatch
00000152 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "config.sys" Microsoft-Windows-NTVDM-System32, Version = 6.0.6002.18005, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_INTEL (0), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "
2011-07-18 17:35:01, info CSI 00000154 [SR] cannot repair the military record [l:20 {10}] "config.sys" Microsoft-Windows-NTVDM-System32, Version = 6.0.6002.18005, pA = PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE_INTEL (0), Culture neutral, VersionScope = 1 nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35}, type neutral, TypeName neutral, neutral to the public key in the store, hash mismatch "CSI 00000155 [SR] this element is referenced by [l:160 {80}] "" Package_25_for_KB948465 ~ 31bf3856ad364e35 ~ x 86 ~ ~ 6.0.1.18005.948465 - 113_neutral_GDR ""
2011-07-18 17:35:01, info CSI 00000158 [SR] could not reproject corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:12 {6}] '------? \C:"\[l:20{10}]"config.sys '; source file in the store is also corrupted2011-07-18 17:40:22, CSI Info 0000021 d [SR] repair complete
2011-07-18 17:40:22, Info CSI 0000021e [SR] Committing transaction
2011-07-18 17:40:23, info CSI 00000222 [SR] check and complete repair operation. All of the files and registry keys listed in this operation were repaired successfullyI don't know if it shows the files listed above the entrance complete repair were repaired or not. Can someone verify corroupted files have been repaired?
Thank you
E-mail address is removed from the privacy *.
Hello
Just load config.sys in Notepad or Wordpad and make sure that nothing indicated do not
(corruption) after file = 80 - move the cursor to the right of the 0 and HOLD the button DELETE
key down until you know nothing is there (perhaps corruption is not visible), then
SAVE the file.Yes all the other issues that should have been repaired if it had everything he does
doesn't look like there was.I hope this helps.
Rob Brown - Microsoft MVP<- profile="" -="" windows="" expert="" -="" consumer="" :="" bicycle="" -="" mark="" twain="" said="" it="">
-
Protection system is unable to repair the file system
After further investigation, the corrupted file is usbhub.sys.mui
SFC is unable to solve this problem, whenever I start windows and run SFC, I get this result "filtered for only SR entries:
2016-08-25 15:33:01, info CSI 00000009 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:01, CSI information 0000000 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:01, information 0000000 c [SR] audit CSI complete
2016-08-25 15:33:01, CSI to 0000000 d [SR] 100 audit information (0 x 0000000000000064) components
2016-08-25 15:33:01, Info CSI 0000000e transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:01, info CSI 00000010 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:01, info CSI 00000011 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:01, transaction Info CSI 00000012 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:01, info CSI 00000014 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:01, info CSI 00000015 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:01, transaction Info CSI 00000016 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:01, info CSI 00000018 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:01, info CSI 00000019 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:01, CSI Info 0000001 a transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:02, Info CSI 0000001 c [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:02, components of CSI Info 0000001 d [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:02, Info CSI 0000001e transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:02, info CSI 00000020 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:02, info CSI 00000021 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:02, transaction Info CSI 00000022 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:02, info CSI 00000024 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:02, info CSI 00000025 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:02, transaction Info CSI 00000026 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:02, info CSI 00000028 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:02, info CSI 00000029 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:02, CSI Info 0000002a transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:02, Info CSI 0000002 c [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:02, info CSI 0000002d [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:02, Info CSI 0000002e transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:02, info CSI 00000030 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:02, info CSI 00000031 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:02, transaction Info CSI 00000032 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:03, info CSI 00000034 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:03, info CSI 00000035 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:03, transaction Info CSI 00000036 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:03, info CSI 00000038 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:03, info CSI 00000039 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:03, CSI Info 0000003a transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:03, CSI Info 0000003 c [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:03, info CSI 0000003d [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:03, Info CSI 0000003e transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:04, info CSI 00000040 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:04, info CSI 00000041 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:04, transaction Info CSI 00000042 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:04, info CSI 00000044 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:04, info CSI 00000045 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:04, Info CSI 00000046 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:04, info CSI 00000048 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:04, info CSI 00000049 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:04, CSI Info 0000004a transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:04, CSI Info 0000004 c [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:04, components of CSI Info 0000004 d [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:04, Info CSI 0000004e transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:04, info CSI 00000050 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:05, info CSI 00000051 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:05, the transaction Info CSI 00000052 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:05, info CSI 00000054 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:05, info CSI 00000055 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:05, the transaction Info CSI 00000056 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:05, info CSI 00000058 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:05, info CSI 00000059 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:05, CSI Info 0000005a transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:06, CSI Info 0000005 c [SR] full check
2016-08-25 15:33:06, components of CSI Info 0000005 d [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:06, Info CSI 0000005e transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:06, info CSI 00000060 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:06, info CSI 00000061 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:06, transaction Info CSI 00000062 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:06, info CSI 00000064 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:06, info CSI 00000065 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:06, transaction Info CSI 00000066 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:07, info CSI 00000069 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:07, CSI Info 0000006 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:07, CSI Info 0000006b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:08, CSI Info 0000006f Verify [SR] full
2016-08-25 15:33:08, info CSI 00000070 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:08, transaction Info CSI 00000071 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:09, info CSI 00000074 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:09, info CSI 00000075 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:09, transaction Info CSI 00000076 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:10, info CSI 00000079 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:10, CSI Info 0000007 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:10, CSI Info 0000007 b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:11, Info CSI 0000007 d [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:11, CSI 0000007e Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:11, CSI Info 0000007f transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:13, 000000 a 4 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:13, 000000 to 5 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:13, 000000 a 6 CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:14, a 000000, 8 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:14, 000000 a 9 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:14, 000000aa CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:15, 000000ac CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:15, 000000ad CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:15, 000000ae CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:16, 000000 b 0 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:16, 000000 b 1 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:16, 000000 b 2 CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:16, 000000 b 4 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:16, 000000 b 5 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:16, 000000 b 6 CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:18, CSI Info 000000 d 9 [SR] check all the
2016-08-25 15:33:18, 000000da CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:18, 000000db CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:19, 000000dd CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:19, CSI 000000de [SR] components Info check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:19, CSI Info 000000df transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:23, 000000e1 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:23, 000000e2 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:23, CSI Info 000000e3 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:24, 000000e7 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:24, CSI Info [SR] 000000e8 components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:24, 000000e9 CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:24, 000000eb CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:24, CSI Info [SR] 000000ec components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:24, CSI Info 000000ed transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:24, 000000ef CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:24, CSI Info [SR] 000000f0 components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:24, 000000f1 CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:25, 000000f3 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:25, 000000f4 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:25, 000000f5 CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:28, info CSI 00000108 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:28, info CSI 00000109 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:28, CSI Info 0000010a transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:28, CSI Info 0000010 c [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:28, components of CSI Info 0000010 d [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:28, Info CSI 0000010e transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:29, info CSI 00000110 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:29, info CSI 00000111 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:29, Info CSI 00000112 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:29, info CSI 00000114 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:29, info CSI 00000115 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:29, transaction Info CSI 00000116 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:30, info CSI 00000119 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:30, CSI Info 0000011 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:30, CSI Info 0000011b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:32, CSI Info 0000011 d [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:32, CSI 0000011e [SR] Info components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:32, CSI Info 0000011f transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:33, info CSI 00000121 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:33, info CSI 00000122 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:33, transaction Info CSI 00000123 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:33, info CSI 00000125 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:33, info CSI 00000126 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:33, transaction Info CSI 00000127 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:34, Info CSI 00000129 [SR] full check
2016-08-25 15:33:34, CSI Info 0000012 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:34, CSI Info 0000012b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:35, Info CSI 0000012d [SR] full check
2016-08-25 15:33:35, CSI 0000012e [SR] Info components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:35, CSI Info 0000012f transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:36, info CSI 00000131 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:36, info CSI 00000132 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:36, transaction Info CSI 00000133 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:39, CSI Info 0000014b Verify [SR] full
2016-08-25 15:33:39, components of CSI Info 0000014 c [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:39, Info CSI 0000014 d [SR] beginning verify and repair transaction
2016 08-25 15:33:40, Info CSI 0000014f [SR] Verify complete
2016-08-25 15:33:40, 00000150 CSI info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:40, transaction Info CSI 00000151 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:44, info CSI 00000153 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:44, info CSI 00000154 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:44, transaction Info CSI 00000155 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:45, Info CSI 00000157 [SR] check complete
2016-08-25 15:33:45, info CSI 00000158 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:45, Info CSI 00000159 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:46, CSI Info 0000015b Verify [SR] full
2016-08-25 15:33:46, components of CSI Info 0000015 c [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:46, CSI Info 0000015 d [SR] beginning verify and repair transaction
2016 08-25 15:33:47, Info CSI 0000015f [SR] Verify complete
2016-08-25 15:33:47, info CSI 00000160 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:47, Info CSI 00000161 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:48, info CSI 00000163 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:48, info CSI 00000164 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:48, Info CSI 00000165 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:49, info CSI 00000169 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:49, CSI Info 0000016 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:49, CSI Info 0000016b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:49, Info CSI 0000016 d [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:49, CSI 0000016e [SR] Info components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:49, CSI Info 0000016f transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:53, info CSI 00000171 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:53, info CSI 00000172 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:53, transaction Info CSI 00000173 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:54, info CSI 00000176 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:54, info CSI 00000177 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:54, transaction Info CSI 00000178 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:33:55, CSI Info 0000017b Verify [SR] full
2016-08-25 15:33:55, components of CSI Info 0000017 c [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:55, CSI Info 0000017 d [SR] beginning verify and repair transaction
2016 08-25 15:33:56, Info CSI 0000017f [SR] Verify complete
2016-08-25 15:33:56, info CSI 00000180 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:56, transaction Info CSI 00000181 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:58, info CSI 00000184 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:58, info CSI 00000185 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:58, transaction Info CSI 00000186 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:59, info CSI 00000188 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:59, info CSI 00000189 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:59, CSI Info 0000018a transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:33:59, CSI Info 0000018 c [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:33:59, components of CSI Info 0000018 d [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:33:59, Info CSI 0000018e transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34, Info CSI 00000191 [SR] full check
2016-08-25 15:34, Info CSI 00000192 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34, transaction Info CSI 00000193 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:01, info CSI 00000195 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:01, info CSI 00000196 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:01, Info CSI 00000197 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:02, info CSI 00000199 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:02, CSI Info 0000019 components [SR] a check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:02, CSI Info 0000019b transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:03, Info CSI 0000019e [SR] full Verify
2016-08-25 15:34:03, CSI 0000019f [SR] components Info check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:03, CSI Info 000001 a 0 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:04, 000001 has 3 CSI Info [SR] full audit
2016-08-25 15:34:04, 000001 has 4 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:04, CSI Info 000001 has 5 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:05, 000001 has 8 CSI Info [SR] full audit
2016-08-25 15:34:05, 000001 has 9 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:05, CSI Info 000001aa transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:07, 000001ac CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:07, 000001ad CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:07, CSI Info 000001ae transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:08, 000001 b 0 CSI Info [SR] full audit
2016-08-25 15:34:08, 000001 b 1 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:08, CSI Info 000001 b 2 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:08, 000001 b 4 CSI Info [SR] full audit
2016-08-25 15:34:08, 000001 b 5 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:08, CSI Info 000001 b 6 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:09, 000001 b 8 CSI Info [SR] full audit
2016-08-25 15:34:09, 000001 b 9 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:09, CSI Info 000001ba transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:10, 000001bc CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:10, 000001bd CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:10, CSI Info 000001be transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:11, CSI Info 000001 c 0 [SR] check all the
2016-08-25 15:34:11, CSI Info 000001 c 1 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:11, CSI Info 000001 c 2 [SR] beginning operation check and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:12, CSI Info 000001 c 4 [SR] check all the
2016-08-25 15:34:12, CSI Info 000001 c 5 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:12, CSI Info 000001 c 6 [SR] beginning operation check and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:12, CSI Info 000001 c 8 [SR] check all the
2016-08-25 15:34:12, CSI Info 000001 c 9 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:12, CSI Info 000001 ca transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:13, 000001cc CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:13, components of CSI Info 000001 cd [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:13, CSI Info 000001ce transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:18, CSI Info 000001 d 0 [SR] check all the
2016-08-25 15:34:18, CSI Info 000001 d 1 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:18, CSI Info 000001 d 2 [SR] beginning operation check and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:19, CSI Info 000001 d 4 [SR] check all the
2016-08-25 15:34:19, CSI Info 000001 d 5 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:19, CSI Info 000001 d 6 [SR] beginning operation check and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:19, CSI Info 000001 d 8 [SR] check all the
2016-08-25 15:34:20, CSI Info 000001 d 9 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:20, 000001da CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:20, 000001dc CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:20, 000001dd CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:20, 000001de CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:20, Info CSI 000001e0 [SR] Verify complete
2016-08-25 15:34:21, 000001e1 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:21, 000001e2 CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:21, 000001e4 CSI Info [SR] repair corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:74 {37}] '------? \C:\Windows\system32\drivers\en-us"\[l:28{14}]"Usbhub.sys.MUI' of the store
2016-08-25 15:34:21, 000001e7 CSI Info [SR] repair corrupted file [ml:520 {260}, l:74 {37}] '------? \C:\Windows\system32\drivers\en-us"\[l:28{14}]"Usbhub.sys.MUI' of the store
2016-08-25 15:34:21, 000001ea CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:21, 000001eb CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:21, 000001ec CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:22, 000001ee CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:22, 000001ef CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:22, 000001f0 CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:23, 000001f8 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:24, 000001f9 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:24, 000001fa CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:24, CSI Info 000001 fc [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:24, 000001fd CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:24, 000001fe CSI Info transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:25, info CSI 00000200 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:25, 00000201 CSI info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:25, transaction Info CSI 00000202 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:25, Info CSI 00000204 [SR] check complete
2016-08-25 15:34:25, 00000205 CSI info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:25, transaction Info CSI 00000206 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:27, info CSI 00000208 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:27, info CSI 00000209 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:27, CSI Info 0000020a transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:28, CSI Info 0000020 c [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:28, components of CSI Info 0000020 d [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:28, Info CSI 0000020e transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:28, info CSI 00000210 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:28, info CSI 00000211 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:28, transaction Info CSI 00000212 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:30, info CSI 00000215 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:30, info CSI 00000216 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:30, Info CSI 00000217 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:32, CSI Info 0000021b Verify [SR] full
2016-08-25 15:34:32, components of CSI Info 0000021 c [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:32, CSI Info 0000021 d [SR] beginning verify and repair transaction
2016 08-25 15:34:33, info CSI 00000222 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:33, info CSI 00000223 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:33, transaction Info CSI 00000224 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:34, Info CSI 00000231 [SR] full check
2016-08-25 15:34:34, Info CSI 00000232 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:34, transaction Info CSI 00000233 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:36, CSI Info 0000023a Verify [SR] full
2016-08-25 15:34:36, CSI Info 0000023 components [SR] b check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:36, CSI Info 0000023 c [SR] beginning verify and repair operation
2016-08-25 15:34:37, Info CSI 0000023e [SR] full Verify
2016-08-25 15:34:37, CSI 0000023f [SR] components Info check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:37, transaction Info CSI 00000240 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:38, info CSI 00000244 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:38, info CSI 00000245 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:38, Info CSI 00000246 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:38, info CSI 00000248 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:38, info CSI 00000249 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:38, CSI Info 0000024a transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:40, Info CSI 0000026f [SR] Verify complete
2016-08-25 15:34:40, info CSI 00000270 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:40, transaction Info CSI 00000271 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:41, Info CSI 00000273 [SR] check complete
2016-08-25 15:34:41, 00000274 CSI info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:41, transaction Info CSI 00000275 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:41, Info CSI 00000277 [SR] check complete
2016-08-25 15:34:42, info CSI 00000278 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:42, transaction Info CSI 00000279 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:42, CSI Info 0000027b Verify [SR] full
2016-08-25 15:34:42, components of CSI Info 0000027 c [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:42, Info CSI 0000027 d [SR] beginning verify and repair transaction
2016-08-25 15:34:43, CSI Info 0000028b Verify [SR] full
2016-08-25 15:34:43, components of CSI Info 0000028 c [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:43, CSI Info 0000028 d [SR] beginning verify and repair transaction
2016 08-25 15:34:43, info CSI 00000292 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:44, info CSI 00000293 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:44, transaction Info CSI 00000294 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:34:45, Info CSI 0000029f [SR] Verify complete
2016-08-25 15:34:45, 000002 a 0 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:45, CSI Info 000002 a-1 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:45, 000002 a 3 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:45, 000002 a 4 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:45, CSI Info 000002a 5 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:47, 000002 a 7 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:47, 000002 a 8 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:47, CSI Info 000002a 9 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:47, 000002ab CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:47, 000002ac CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:47, CSI Info 000002ad transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:48, 000002af CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:48, 000002 b 0 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:48, CSI Info 000002b 1 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:48, 000002 b 3 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:48, 000002 b 4 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:48, CSI Info 000002b 5 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:49, 000002 b 7 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:49, 000002 b 8 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:49, CSI Info 000002b 9 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:51, CSI Info 000002 d 3 [SR] check all the
2016-08-25 15:34:51, CSI Info 000002 d 4 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:51, CSI Info 000002 d 5 [SR] beginning operation check and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:55, CSI Info 000002 d 7 [SR] check all the
2016-08-25 15:34:55, CSI Info 000002 d 8 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:55, CSI Info 000002 d 9 [SR] beginning operation check and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:56, 000002db CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:56, 000002dc CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:56, CSI Info 000002dd transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:57, 000002df CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:57, CSI Info 000002e0 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:57, CSI Info 000002e1 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:57, 000002e5 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:57, Info CSI [SR] 000002e6 components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:57, CSI Info 000002e7 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:58, 000002e9 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:58, 000002ea CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:58, CSI Info 000002eb transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:59, 000002ed CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:59, 000002ee CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:59, CSI Info 000002ef transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:34:59, 000002f1 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:34:59, 000002f2 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:34:59, CSI Info 000002f3 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:35, 000002f6 CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:35, 000002f7 CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:35, CSI Info 000002f8 transaction [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:35:01, 000002fa CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:35:01, 000002fb CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:35:01, CSI Info 000002 fc [SR] beginning verify and repair operation
2016-08-25 15:35:02, 000002fe CSI Info [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:35:02, 000002ff CSI Info [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:35:02, transaction Info CSI 00000300 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:35:02, info CSI 00000302 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:35:02, info CSI 00000303 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:35:02, Info CSI 00000304 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:35:03, info CSI 00000307 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:35:03, info CSI 00000308 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:35:03, Info CSI 00000309 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:35:04, CSI Info 0000030b Verify [SR] full
2016-08-25 15:35:04, components of CSI Info 0000030 c [SR] 100 audit (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:35:04, CSI Info 0000030 d [SR] beginning verify and repair transaction
2016 08-25 15:35:05, Info CSI 0000030f [SR] Verify complete
2016-08-25 15:35:05, info CSI 00000310 [SR] components check 100 (0 x 0000000000000064)
2016-08-25 15:35:05, the transaction Info CSI 00000311 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:35:06, info CSI 00000313 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:35:06, info CSI 00000314 [SR] components check 71 (0 x 0000000000000047)
2016-08-25 15:35:06, transaction Info CSI 00000315 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016 08-25 15:35:06, info CSI 00000317 [SR] verification complete
2016-08-25 15:35:06, info CSI 00000318 [SR] repair 2 components
2016-08-25 15:35:06, transaction Info CSI 00000319 [SR] beginning verify and repair
2016-08-25 15:35:06, CSI 0000031b [SR] repair corrupt file Info [ml:520 {260}, l:74 {37}] '------? \C:\Windows\system32\drivers\en-us"\[l:28{14}]"Usbhub.sys.MUI' of the store
2016 08-25 15:35:06, CSI 0000031e Info [SR] repair complete
2016-08-25 15:35:06, CSI 0000031f [SR] Committing transaction Info
2016 08-25 15:35:06, info CSI 00000323 [SR] check and complete repair operation. All of the files and registry keys listed in this operation were repaired successfullyWell Yes, if its been properly repaired, why do I need the 'fix' after every start?
Hello
Please try to run the DISM to correct the error. Please follow the steps in this link.
Otherwise, you can do System Restore to restore your computer to its previous state before this error occurs. Remember to backup your files before performing this step.
If you need assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Kind regards.
-
The validation process hung for a table only!
Hi all
There is a table contains 79 columns (with a cloumn CLOB) with about 100 000 record, sometimes a problem occurs only with this table (and only these days) when you attempt to insert, update, delete from this table, the validation process hung! Why? and how to solve? I can't say why this problem occurs.
We renamed the table and re-create using EXPDP, IMPDP orders, re-create triggers on it and repeat grants thereon to the roles that the previous, this procedure has solved the problem for maybe one day only, but the problem returns!
Notes:
This table is on a table space users, otherwise I use DB Oracle 11 g R2
> The question is: What does it mean the blocking locks? and why this problem occurs? and how to avoid it from happening again?
Have you read this:
https://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E18283_01/server.112/e16508/consist.htm
For example, this part:
Written in conflict read-committed Transactions
In a read committed transaction, a write conflict occurs when the transaction attempts to change an update by a simultaneous uncommitted transaction line, sometimes called a blocking transaction.
The read committed transaction awaits the transaction that blocks at the end and release his lock of line. The options are the following:
-If the blocking transaction is cancelled, the pending transaction then proceeds to change the locked row previously as if the other transaction never existed.
-If the blocking transaction is committed and frees its locks, then the transaction pending proceeds to update scheduled for the newly modified line.
> Where can I find this log file please?
For example:
C:\app\oracle\diag\rdbms\oracle\orcl\trace\alert_orcl.log
Kind regards
Zlatko
-
Java Oracle GoldenGate adapter the data loss after the failure of the transactionCommit()?
I am developing a custom Manager to deliver the change Oracle logs.
When errors have occurred, normally, I can throw RuntimeException or return Status.ABEND. Then OGG would be the error in the log and stop the process.
The following code works fine when operationAdded() failed (extraction process will report abend, and when extraction of restarting after errors, the operations in the transaction failure would be referred to the Manager).
@Override
public Status operationAdded(DsEvent e, DsTransaction tx,
DsOperation dsOperation) {
Status status = super.operationAdded(e, tx, dsOperation);
...
//throw new RuntimeException("op add runtime error");
return status;
}However, when the error occurred in the function transactionCommit(), OGG does work as expected. Throw RuntimeException or return only Status.Abend can stop the extract. Just OGG continue to work like nothing happened. (Code below)
@Override
public Status transactionCommit(DsEvent e, DsTransaction tx) {
super.transactionCommit(e, tx);
Status status = sendEvents();
handlerProperties.totalTxns++;
//throw new RuntimeException("tx ci runtime error");
return Status.ABEND;
}I tried to kill and restart the extraction process. The transaction that failed were not referred to the Manager. It seems that all the transaction data that failed were lost!
Here are the logs of return Status.ABEND in transactionCommit():
...
DEBUG [main] (AbstractHandler.java:509) - Event: handler=ggdatahub, transactionCommit ( Commit transaction ) DsTransaction [ops=1, buffered=1, state=BEGIN, start=2015-08-21 20:04:25.842275, end=2015-08-21 20:04:25.842275]
WARN [main] (DsEventManager.java:231) - Error sending event to handler: status=ABEND, event=Commit transaction, handler=ggdatahub
Exception in thread "main" com.goldengate.atg.util.GGException: Unable to commit transaction, STATUS=ABEND
at com.goldengate.atg.datasource.UserExitDataSource.commitActiveTransaction(UserExitDataSource.java:1392)
at com.goldengate.atg.datasource.UserExitDataSource.commitTx(UserExitDataSource.java:1326)
Error occured in javawriter.c[752]:
***********************************************************************
Exception received committing transaction: com.goldengate.atg.util.GGException: Unable to commit transaction, STATUS=ABEND
DEBUG [main] (UserExitDataSource.java:504) - (JNI) C-user-exit checkpoint event
DEBUG [main] (UserExitDataSource.java:1364) - UserExitDataSource.CommitActiveTransaction: Same transaction committed more than once (possibly due to commit-on-checkpoint).
DEBUG [main] (UserExitDataSource.java:516) - UserExitDataSource.userExitCheckpoint: incrementing the flush counter
DEBUG [main] (PendingOpGroup.java:315) - now ready to checkpoint? false (was ready? false): {pendingOps=1, groupSize=0, timer=0:00:00.000 [total = 0 ms ]}
DEBUG [main] (UserExitDataSource.java:504) - (JNI) C-user-exit checkpoint event
DEBUG [main] (UserExitDataSource.java:1364) - UserExitDataSource.CommitActiveTransaction: Same transaction committed more than once (possibly due to commit-on-checkpoint).
DEBUG [main] (UserExitDataSource.java:516) - UserExitDataSource.userExitCheckpoint: incrementing the flush counter
DEBUG [pool-1-thread-1] (AbstractDataSource.java:737) - [2] getStatusReport: Mon Aug 24 10:51:14 CST 2015
DEBUG [Thread-1] (UserExitDataSource.java:1601) - UserExitDataSource closing, #1 of class="UserExitDataSource"
DEBUG [main] (PendingOpGroup.java:315) - now ready to checkpoint? false (was ready? false): {pendingOps=3, groupSize=0, timer=0:00:00.000 [total = 0 ms ]}
DEBUG [Thread-1] (UserExitDataSource.java:1608) - Shutting down data source; attempting a final checkpoint.
INFO [pool-1-thread-1] (AbstractDataSource.java:730) - Memory at Status : Max: 455.00 MB, Total: 60.50 MB, Free: 27.54 MB, Used: 32.96 MB
DEBUG [pool-1-thread-1] (UserExitDataSource.java:1637) - time spent checkpointing: 0:00:00.000 [total = 0 ms ]
DEBUG [Thread-1] (UserExitDataSource.java:1668) - doCheckpoint() called
INFO [pool-1-thread-1] (AbstractDataSource.java:980) - Status report: Mon Aug 24 10:51:14 CST 2015
*************************************************
Status Report for UserExit
*************************************************
Total elapsed time: 2 days 14:47:06.139 [total = 226026 sec = 3767 min = 62 hr ] => Total time since first event
Event processing time: 0:00:12.692 [total = 12 sec ] => Time spent sending msgs (max: 4795 ms)
Metadata process time: 0:00:02.159 [total = 2 sec ] => Time spent receiving metadata (1 tables, 3 columns)
Operations Received/Sent: 3 / 3
Rate (overall): 0 op/s (peak: 0 op/s)
(per event): 0 op/s
Transactions Received/Sent: 2 / 0
Rate (overall): 0 tx/s (peak: 0 tx/s)
(per event): 0 tx/s
3 records processed as of Mon Aug 24 10:51:14 CST 2015 (rate 0/sec, delta 3)
*************************************************Someone knows how to fix this? Thanks in advance!
For others who may encounter this problem:
It turns out be a bug...
I switch to Version 11.2.1.0.1 OGGCORE_11.2.1.0.1_PLATFORMS_120423.0230 Version 12.1.2.1.4 OGGCORE_12.1.2.1.0OGGBP_PLATFORMS_150303.1209 20470586 . Everything works fine now.
-
Re how to recover from A corrupted or deleted TLOG (Doc ID 764603.1)
What/where is the table of tran $ xa mentioned in this doc, and how is it used? (The scenario that I think is where the request has failed but the TLOG was not shared / mirror and a manual recovery of uncertain transactions is necessary.) The RMs would be MQ 7.0.1 and DBMS Oracle 11 g 2).
Thanks for any help.
Hello
I do not have the document you speak so I can't say with certainty what it is, but from the name, it sounds like a table of Oracle database or notices related to XA transactions. Smoking does not use a table or a view of the same name.
To understand what is happening if the Tuxedo transaction log is 'lost', let us look at the State of transactions:
- Before calling tpcommit(), nothing in the Tuxedo transaction log. There may be in the RMs application interacts with pending transactions, but none of them will be established. If a failure will leave at this stage these transactions suspended until they have time because during the restart of Tuxedo he calls xa_recover(), but he won't be in the RMs uncertain transactions because they have not been prepared.
- After the application calls tpcommit() before RMs all respond positively to the xa_prepare(), yet once there will be nothing in the Tuxedo transaction log, so a failure of Tuxedo at this stage is the same as above.
- Once all of the RM responded positively to xa_prepare(), then and only then will Tuxedo create a transaction log entry. At this point if Tuxedo fails, it will read the transaction log rebuild the table of partially committed transactions and then call xa_recover() on the RMs. For all RMs report transactions that are not in the list of partially committed transactions, Tuxedo will call xa_rollback(). If the transactions reported by the RMs appear in the list, then Tuxedo will call xa_commit(). If we delete the transaction log could not be read, etc., there will be no entries in the partially committed operations, so all transactions reported by the RMs will be rolledback. This CAN cause an inconsistency that the transaction may already have been committed by an another RM involved in the transaction.
- Once all of the RM responded positively to xa_commit(), Tuxedo lazily deletes the entry of transaction log. At this point, any breach will be similar to the first bullet above.
Can you give us some details on what exactly is your concern?
Kind regards
Todd little
Chief Architect of Oracle Tuxedo
-
CANCEL reading and overall-TWG temporary table
Hello Expert!
Based on an analysis made by my colleagues... He mentions on a compound of SQL to extract data only to leave a TWG and overturn readings! (Current_obj # ash captured as a event 0 and wait - db_file_sequential_read)
The thought difficult to obtain a cancellation reason reading when extracting data from TWG!.
On cancellation, cancellation would be needed!
But as TWG specific Session, at any time in my session would read the latest copy for all operations. This reading must come from a buffer or disc (Temp).
Why a reading of cancellation will be required?
Can you please help me understand a scenario where cancel read for TWG is valid or unrealistic?
Or conceptually missed something?
Based on an analysis made by my colleagues... He mentions on a compound of SQL to extract data only to leave a TWG and overturn readings! (Current_obj # ash captured as a event 0 and wait - db_file_sequential_read)
The thought difficult to obtain a cancellation reason reading when extracting data from TWG!.
TWG activity generates CANCEL as a result of DML for any table. Which CANCEL then also causes RESTORE to be generated.
On cancellation, cancellation would be needed!
OK - but this isn't the only case of use.
But as TWG specific Session, at any time in my session would read the latest copy for all operations. This reading must come from a buffer or disc (Temp).
And that is where you get off the track. These statements are NOT correct.
A session can open several sliders on these data TWG and these several cursors can represent a different "coherent reading" as far as data is concerned.
Tom Kyte explains better in this AskTom blog.
https://asktom.Oracle.com/pls/Apex/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:4135403700346803387
and we said...
Yes, temporary tables generate UNDO - and therefore to generate REDO to CANCEL it.
Do it again for the cancellation must be created because Cancel is treated the same, the undo tablespace seems to be corrupted on an event of failure/media instance recovery if the cancellation has disappeared.
The cancellation must be filed in support of the coherence of reading. For example, if you:
(a) charge a TWG of temporary table with data
(b) open cursor_1 SELECT * from TWG
(c) update the data of TWG
(d) open cursor_2 SELECT * from TWG
(e) delete most of the data of TWG
(f) open cursor_3 SELECT * from TWG
Each of these sliders should see a different result set - we have not recovered from them, has just opened their. cursor_1 must push the blocks changed to point in time (b). This requires CANCELLATION. Thus, the cancellation must be generated - and undo is always protected by the roll forward.
Changed blocks to the TWG, as for ANY table could be physically written to disk until the transaction is completed. It is not always room in the cache buffers for ALL data that has changed.
And, as Tom above, each of the sliders really sees the data at a point different 'read-consistent. If some of these extractions of cursor will require reading the UNDO data for "compatible" data for this particular slider.
The point in time' is established when a cursor is open - no data has yet been read yet.
See the section 'Multiversion Concurrency Control' of the doc
https://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/consist.htm#i17881
Multiversion Concurrency Control
Database Oracle automatically provides the reading consistency to a query so that all the data that sees the request comes from a single point in time (at the level of instruction read consistency). Oracle database can also provide read consistency to all queries in a transaction (consistency of reading at the level of transactions).
Oracle database uses information stored in its rollback segments to provide these consistent views. Rollback segments contain old data values that have been changed by validated or recently committed transactions. Figure 13-1 shows how the Oracle database provides consistent reading using rollback segments data at the level of instruction.
That reference above 'consistent read to a query' also applies when cursors are opened.
-
Downloading not Word and Excel files
Hi guys,.
My Version of Jdev is 11.1.2.4.0. I'm working on uploading and downloading files in the blob column. When I download image, txt files its fine.but of work in the case of word and excel files its me gives error.
< Utils > < buildFacesMessage > ADF: addition of the following JSF error message: attribute set to RahulInvestment_Declaration_Form_ - 1314_2_.xlsx to FlxVch01 in AppModule.Mdm0405EOView4 a precision/scale not valid
oracle.jbo.AttrSetValException: Houston-27010: attribute set to RahulInvestment_Declaration_Form_ - 1314_2_.xlsx to FlxVch01 in AppModule.Mdm0405EOView4 a precision/scale not valid
at oracle.jbo.rules.RulesBeanUtils.createException(RulesBeanUtils.java:381)
at oracle.jbo.rules.RulesBeanUtils.createException(RulesBeanUtils.java:360)
at oracle.jbo.rules.AbstractValidator.createException(AbstractValidator.java:1076)
at oracle.jbo.rules.AbstractValidator.doRaiseException(AbstractValidator.java:1119)
at oracle.jbo.rules.AbstractValidator.raiseException(AbstractValidator.java:1108)
at oracle.jbo.rules.JboAbstractValidator.raiseException(JboAbstractValidator.java:415)
at oracle.jbo.rules.AbstractValidator.raiseException(AbstractValidator.java:1095)
at oracle.jbo.rules.JboAbstractValidator.callValidateValueWithContext(JboAbstractValidator.java:241)
at oracle.jbo.rules.JboAbstractValidator.validate(JboAbstractValidator.java:392)
at oracle.jbo.rules.RulesBeanUtils.validateObject(RulesBeanUtils.java:725)
at oracle.jbo.rules.RulesBeanUtils.validate(RulesBeanUtils.java:696)
at oracle.jbo.server.AttributeDefImpl.validate(AttributeDefImpl.java:3242)
at oracle.jbo.server.AttributeDefImpl.set(AttributeDefImpl.java:3187)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.setAttributeInternal(EntityImpl.java:1938)
at oracle.jbo.server.AttributeDefImpl.resolveSet(AttributeDefImpl.java:3403)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.setAttrInvokeAccessor(EntityImpl.java:1919)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.setAttribute(EntityImpl.java:1846)
at oracle.jbo.server.ViewRowStorage.setAttributeValue(ViewRowStorage.java:2350)
at oracle.jbo.server.ViewRowStorage.setAttributeInternal(ViewRowStorage.java:2152)
at oracle.jbo.server.ViewRowImpl.setAttributeInternal(ViewRowImpl.java:1483)
at oracle.jbo.server.ViewRowImpl.setAttrInvokeAccessor(ViewRowImpl.java:1458)
at oracle.jbo.server.ViewRowImpl.setAttribute(ViewRowImpl.java:1052)
at oracle.jbo.server.ViewRowImpl.setAttribute(ViewRowImpl.java:992)
at customerStatus.supplierInfoClass.uploadAttach(supplierInfoClass.java:143)
at customerStatus.supplierInfoClass.diagDocDL(supplierInfoClass.java:118)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0 (Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at com.sun.el.parser.AstValue.invoke (unknown Source)
at com.sun.el.MethodExpressionImpl.invoke (unknown Source)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.broadcastToMethodExpression(UIXComponentBase.java:1589)
at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.UIXDialog.broadcast(UIXDialog.java:98)
at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.UIXRegion.broadcast(UIXRegion.java:159)
at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.broadcastEvents(LifecycleImpl.java:1137)
at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl._executePhase(LifecycleImpl.java:361)
at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.execute(LifecycleImpl.java:202)
at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:508)
to weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ ServletServiceAction.run (StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.TailFilter.doFilter(TailFilter.java:26)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
at oracle.adf.model.servlet.ADFBindingFilter.doFilter(ADFBindingFilter.java:173)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.rich.RegistrationFilter.doFilter(RegistrationFilter.java:125)
to org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl$ FilterListChain.doFilter (TrinidadFilterImpl.java:468)
at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.activedata.AdsFilter.doFilter(AdsFilter.java:60)
to org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl$ FilterListChain.doFilter (TrinidadFilterImpl.java:468)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl._doFilterImpl(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:293)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl.doFilter(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:199)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.TrinidadFilter.doFilter(TrinidadFilter.java:92)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
to oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter$ 1.run(JpsAbsFilter.java:119)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged (Native Method)
at oracle.security.jps.util.JpsSubject.doAsPrivileged(JpsSubject.java:315)
at oracle.security.jps.ee.util.JpsPlatformUtil.runJaasMode(JpsPlatformUtil.java:442)
at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.runJaasMode(JpsAbsFilter.java:103)
at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.doFilter(JpsAbsFilter.java:171)
at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsFilter.doFilter(JpsFilter.java:71)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
at oracle.dms.servlet.DMSServletFilter.doFilter(DMSServletFilter.java:139)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.RequestEventsFilter.doFilter(RequestEventsFilter.java:27)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
to weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun (WebAppServletContext.java:3715)
to weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ ServletInvocationAction.run (WebAppServletContext.java:3681)
at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2277)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2183)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1454)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
< Utils > < buildFacesMessage > ADF: addition of the following JSF error message: attribute set to application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet for FlxVch02 in AppModule.Mdm0405EOView4 a precision/scale not valid
oracle.jbo.AttrSetValException: Houston-27010: attribute set to application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet for FlxVch02 in AppModule.Mdm0405EOView4 a precision/scale not valid
Is my code for the Java download
UploadedFile myfile = (UploadedFile) this.getFile ();
BindingContext bindingctx = BindingContext.getCurrent ();
BindingContainer links = bindingctx.getCurrentBindingsEntry ();
DCBindingContainer bindingsImpl = (DCBindingContainer) links;
DCIteratorBinding iter = bindingsImpl.findIteratorBinding("Mdm0405EOView4Iterator");
Line = iter.getCurrentRow ();
Download the file into the Blob column
row.setAttribute ("FldBlb", createBlobDomain (myfile));
File name
String fileName = (String) myfile.getFilename ();
row.setAttribute ("FlxVch01", fileName);
Content/MIME file type
String fileContentType = (String) myfile.getContentType ();
row.setAttribute ("FlxVch02", fileContentType);
Committing Transaction
Method of the class OperationBinding = bindings.getOperationBinding ("Commit");
Method.Execute ();
Returns a null value.
Thank you
Raul
You try to set a type mime in the attribute FlxVch02 what id too long for the space provided in the db table.
He must either reduce the type or increase the length of the column in the table for the type of mine.
Timo
-
Error loading credit using planning instance configuration management target
Hi allI'm migrating Oracle credit functional configuration management (model Scoring list, automation rules) of the source to the target instance instance. I am trying to achieve through the use of planning. Once the load completed, I get the following error and configurations are not migrated. This error only appears for the configuration of credit management. Not for the other features. Please help me on this.
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Implementation of the application: Version: 12.0.0
Copyright (c) 1979, 1999, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Module AZR12LOADER: planning Loader R12
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Current system time is October 9, 2013 03:15:18
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Simultaneous request parameters
******************************
RELOAD_REQUEST_ID =
DBC_FILE_NAME = DEVF. DBC
SNAPSHOT_REQUEST_TYPE = E
Nom_snap = Test credit RAC management
RELOAD_METHOD =
REQUEST_TYPE = L
IS_REMOTE = Y
JOB_NAME = RAC credit management Test1
USER_NAME = DEPPS
Download of the excerpt from the central instance
Managed to copy the snippet
Time required to download extract and write in the file zip = 0 seconds
Validation of first extract...
Driver.xml analysis
Time needed to analyze the driver file and build the milliseconds of objects: 6 installation
API to sort based on their addiction...
Time required to sort the API = 12 milliseconds
Print sorting API
*********************
Loading sequence 1
*************
(1) AR_CMGT_Scores
October 9, 2013 03:15:48 oracle.adf.share.config.ADFConfigFactory findOrCreateADFConfig
INFO: oracle.adf.share.config.ADFConfigFactory no META-INF/adf - config.xml not found
******************************************
Name: AR_CMGT_Scores
Type: BC4J
Path: oracle.apps.ar.ispeed.creditmgt.scores.server.ScoresAM
Time Taken (seconds): 2.0
Lines in the xml file import and validating the lines...
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = updates are not supported by this API.
;
-----------------------------------------
74 rows processed, now showing the changes to the database...
-----------------------------------------
Committed transaction.
-----------------------------------------
API:AR_CMGT_Scores transformed
Status: WARNING
******************************************
Simultaneous program ends.
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Beginning of the FND_FILE log messages
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
End of the FND_FILE log messages
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Options, AutoComplete, the request for enforcement.
End of query options AutoComplete.
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Simultaneous request ended
Current system time is October 9, 2013 03:15:50
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Please make sure that you have applied patches (error when used with Oracle credit Management (OCM) to transfer installation (Doc ID 1129843.1) planning data).
Thank you
Hussein
-
How to prohibit this restoration?
Hi, all the experts:
How to prohibit this restoration? the hidden or using events parameter?
Thanks in advance.>
Roll forward is the application of commited transactions recorded in the journals of restoration by progression, for the data files before a crash.
>
Isn't that partially correct - before rolling process also applies "uncommitted" transactions from the logs of recovery. These "committed," operations are then 'cancelled' during 'restore '.See the section 'Crash and recovery proceedings' in the doc of database Concepts
http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/startup.htm#sthref1431
>
Crash recovery and instance involves two distinct operations: roll forward of the current data files online using the operations committed and uncommitted contained in online redo records and then back change in transactions not posted to their original state.
>
The reason that uncommitted transactions must also be applied is explained in this section.
>
Two potential problems can occur if an instance failure occurs:Blocks of data modified by a transaction could not be written in time the validation data files and may only appear in the redo log. Therefore, the redo log contains changes must be redone to the database during recovery.
After the roll before the phase, data files could contain changes that had not committed at the time of the failure. These uncommitted changes must be cancelled in order to ensure the consistency of the transactions. These changes were either recorded in the files of data before the failure, is introduced in the phase before rolling.
>
The foregoing explains how data files can contain uncommitted changes.
>
To resolve this dilemma, two distinct steps are typically used by the Oracle database for a successful recovery from a failure of the system: roll forward with the redo log (recovery of cache) and roll back with lower prices or cancel segments (recovery of the transaction).
>
'Cancel' the unsaved changes in files of data Oracle to use rollback/undo segments. The problem is that when you get the information you need not necessarily be in these segments. But this information IS in the REDO logs.So part of this "roll forward" phase works also on segments rollback/cancellation to the same point in time as the data files... Then the phase of "restore" can "undo" transactions not posted from data files using that info restored by the restore/undo segments that present the advanced phase of roll.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Apple pay ceases to function in standby
One of the best features of my Apple Watch is the convenience of compensation from Apple. It's fantastic! Unfortunately this function no longer works after upgrading IPhone 6 to 9.3.4. Any help would be greatly appreciated. George
-
You can change the search engine Google to something else on the default Firefox homepage?
Topic: home page has always Google image search. Is it possible to change this and if this is the case, how could I do.
-
Transfer e mails with attachments
When I receive e-mails with attachments - users of Microsoft - if I send them on - yet once users to Microsoft, they are either impossible to open the attachment or he's not here to open! So I've only had my mac for a year I am still finding my way r
-
Programmatically change the SMU-2529 with NISE topology
Hello! I have an SMU-2529 control by NISE to test certain products. These products require the topology of the matrix to change while I'm testing them. Is it possible to do it by programming? Opening/closing session NISE can be solution (although I p
-
Hello I have an application requiring an acquisition of data via tcp. In the main loop, I wait for teaching (tuned for the new tcp connection), and if I read a particular string, I start the acquisition using a under VI. If I read another channel I n