Authors of mounting of the modules

Similar Questions

• Target Disk Mode - MacBook is not mounted in the desktop iMac

  I have a MacBook to 2015 and a cable USB-A-USB-C marked 'SS '.  In November 2015, I might start my MacBook in TDM and plug it into my iMac 2013 and see him mount on the desktop.  I could then synchronize some of the files (using synchronize folders) and have up-to-date on my MacBook.  Both computers running El Capitan.

  But about 3 months ago this system has stopped working.  Editing of my MacBook on the desktop iMac became sporadic and now never happens.  I have tried different cables, connected to different USB ports (the back of the iMac, iMac keyboard and a Flash to USB dock (Belkin)), but no joy.

  Has updated the firmware of computers?  El Capitan has stopped this feature very useful to work?

  Any ideas, anyone?

  Chris

  As a work-around, there are other ways of synchronization of files between devices.

  iCloud Drive, Box, OneDrive, DropBox, Google Drive. These will make everything you do.

• control of fascist style of addons is a bad thing and prevents from getting the modules there are out there of dev.

  control of fascist style of addons is a bad thing and prevents from getting the modules there are out there of dev.

  This will be only stifle creativity and prevent new addons are made.

  Said heavyoak

  control of fascist style of addons is a bad thing and prevents from getting the modules there are out there of dev.

  This will be only stifle creativity and prevent new addons are made.

  How is that what does strike you?
  https://blog.Mozilla.org/addons/2015/08/21/the-future-of-developing-Firefox-Add-ons/

  «We are implementing a new extension API, called WebExtensions...» »

  The infrastructure of the current extensions will be gone and with it will have the advantage of current extensibility that Firefox had more Chrome and Opera. Kinda like the rating "fascism" for "communism".

  So at the end of next year we can be moaning about something much bigger than the current "signature" minor schism or "bump in the road."

• How can I DISABLE the module "signature" when I want TO use an older add-on?

  I the MAGNIFICENT Add on 1 - ClickWeather and now has a message on the 'signature' module Now... I DON'T want to use a product of INFERIOR quality such as suggested in the name of the add - on.

  I would use the add-on that I already have on my Firefox, 1-ClickWeather. So, how can I disable the 'signature' on an individual add-on module? It is said to "Act with caution", but it does not show Me the details of my time. I reinstalled the add-on, but it does not yet record my position.

  Yes, I KNOW it is no longer supported, but has always worked until this past Saturday. It was abandoned several years ago but was kept alive by a single poster whose comments have disappeared. I have the add-on on my computer. I continued to update the continuous Firefox updates. Now, I want to again but there's this ridiculous thing on the module "signature" and «proceed with caution...» »

  You cannot delete the warning, but in 42 Firefox extension should always work.

  See:

  • https://wiki.Mozilla.org/addons/Extension_Signing
  • https://blog.Mozilla.org/addons/2015/02/10/extension-signing-safer-experience/

   Firefox 40-42: Firefox warns about signatures but doesn't enforce them.

• I have install the module "adblock more ' on my android furefox browser, but not block, he adds. What can I do?

  I have install the module "adblock more ' on my android furefox browser, but not block, he adds. What can I do? Please help me quickly.

  You should contact the https://adblockplus.org/forum/ extension

• Impossible to install the modules that are hosted outside of AMO

  I can't install any add-on that is hosted outside of AMO, in Firefox for Android 40.0.3, nor in Firefox Beta for Android 41.

  What I think should happen: I have download the file as signed (it records to SD card), then open it with Firefox and Firefox should ask me if I want to install this module.

  What is really happening: an add-on is downloaded, but when I open it is file as with Firefox - nothing happens. Firefox comes to shows me a blank screen (see the screenshot).

  My friend has this problem too.

  Looks like a regression bug (because I could install add-ons hosted out of AMO without any problems in previous versions), but I'm not entirely sure.

  So my question is: should I file a bug on Bugzilla or is it possible to install the modules hosted outside of AMO to Firefox for Android and it's just me something wrong?

  My phone has Android v2.3.5.

  UPDATE: apparently, I can not install the modules of local files, but can do some some sites. My module (I have problem with) is hosted on Github, and I can't install it for whatever reason.

  Update 2: it seems that modules can be installed from Github if she is not just a file (because Github changed Content-Disposition of at least some types of raw file of 'inline' to 'attachment'), but a binary attachment to a "news release".

  Apparently, I found a work around for this problem, so that this issue does not require a response more.

• How can I recover the modules and their data from a failed HARD drive (the lost BONE areas, but data files are readable)?

  The HARD drive that was my OS (Windows XP Pro SP3) failed and lost quite a few areas which are essential for the operating system running. Other data is still readable. A got another HARD drive and installed Windows XP SP2, Firefox and other programs. I was able to retrieve the bookmarks, security certificates, and other profile information using the information found in bandages.

  None of them addressed how do to recover the modules or their data. Specifically, there are several large, elegant scripts that took months to develop and customize.

  Articles related to migration and other do not work for me because they require the old copy of FF is functional, that is not because the OS on this HARD drive is damaged. Is it possible to recover these data, similar (or not) about how I could get the other profile info?

  Have you copied the entire folder C:\Documents and Settings\username \Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\ on the old drive?
  If this is not the case, can you?
  If so, make a copy and save this folder just in case.

  If so, you could replace this folder on the new facility by \Profiles\ [with your profiles inside] folder and the profiles.ini file [delete all other files / folders that may also be in the folder "Firefox"] -and then replace with the same folder named from the old failed drive. Note that you will lose what you already have with the new installation / profile!
  Your profile folder contains all your personal data and customizations, including looking for plugins, themes, extensions and their data / customizations - but no plugins.
  But if the user logon name is different on the new facility that the former, any extension that uses an absolute path to the file in its prefs will be problems. Easily rectified, by changing the path to the file in the file prefs, js - keep the brake line formatting intact. The extensions created after the era of Firefox 2.0 or 3.0, due to changes in the 'rules' for creating extensions usually are not a problem, but some real old extensions that need only "minor" since that time can still use absolute paths - even though I have not seen myself since Firefox Firefox 3.6 or 4.0.

  View instead of 'Modules' I mentioned the 4 types of 'Modules' separately - Plugins are seen as 'Add-ons', but they are not installed in the profile [except those mislabelled as a "plugin", when they are installed via an XPI file], but rather in the operating system where Firefox 'find' through the registry.

  Note: Migration articles can tell you do not re - use the prefs.js file, due to an issue that I feel is easily fixed with a little inspection and editing. I think you can manage that my perception is that you have a small shovel in your tool box, if you encounter a problem you are able to do a little digging and fixing problems with the paths to files - once you have been warned.

  Overall, if you go Firefox 35 35 or even Firefox 34 to 35, I don't think you will run in all the problems that you can not handle [that I cross my fingers and "hope" that I'm not on what it is obvious].

  With regard to the recovery of the 'data' for individual extensions - there are many ways that extension developers used to store their data and pref. The original way should save in prefs.js or their own file RDF in the profile folder. While Firefox has been developed more, developers started using their own files in the profile folder. And because Mozilla has started using sqlite database files in Firefox 3.0, Mozilla extended their own use of sqlite, as have extension developers.
  Elegant uses the file stylish.sqlite to store 'styles', but something in the back of my mine tells me that 'the index' maybe not in this file with the data. But then again, I can be confusing myself a question I had with GreaseMonkey awhile back where I copied the gm_scripts folder in a new profile and with already installed GreaseMonkey but with no script. These GM scripts worked, but I could not see them or modify them - they do not appear in the user GM extension interface window in Firefox.

• The add-on works with Firefox 33.0 on a single computer, but on a different computer, Firefox 33.0 indicates that the module is not compatible.

  I have a laptop and a desktop computer. Both are HP and both have recently been updated with the latest version of 8.1 and 33.0 Firefox Windows. On the desktop, Norton Toolbar still works fine. However, on the laptop, Norton Toolbar is disabled and the modules Web page has a message saying that Norton Toolbar is not compatible with Firefox 33.0. Why is this compatible on my desk, but not on my laptop?

  Hello, according to norton toolbar is already compatible with firefox versions, including the current version. Please run the norton utility liveupdate repeatedly & until all components are up-to-date. Additionally, make sure that the toolbar is enabled under firefox > addons > extension thereafter.

  For more information, please refer to https://community.norton.com/blogs/product-update-announcements/firefox-33-und-norton-toolbar

• Do not see the module

  Installed the module https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/yandexmetrika/?src=search.
  It must be seen in the background of firefox (Panel). But there is no such Panel http://monosnap.com/image/Xupa5dobHNv93nkY2zHSUvXsgX0yDK

  Many of us use
  
  Restorer Classic theme (Customize Australis)
  
  Restore the tabs squared, appmenu, modules, small display bar icons and more on Australis UI (Windows/MacOSX/Linux + Fx 29 +).

• SQLite Manager does not work with the v11. Until make you it easier to go back to older versions or newer versions stop, breaking most of the modules I won't use Firefox

  SQLite Manager does not work with the v11. Until that make it easier to return to older versions or newer versions stop, breaking most of the modules I use FirefoxHow to come back at 10 Firefox?

  Update Firefox 23.0 which published yesterday afternoon.

  • https://www.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/all/

• How to stop the module loading bar?

  I see a few other similar questions without answers, so thought that I post the question to see if someone has thought of it.

  I DON'T want the bar the module at the bottom of my browser window... so why should I do? Firefox does a wonderful job in all other respects... I don't understand why he needs to add this hideous bar when it is not wanted, or needed.

  Yes, I have two Add-ons, but they both have an icon in the navigation window URL... so why would I want same two icons in this bar? Thanks for any help.

  
  

• I've updated to 10 FF and my RealDownloader module is disabled. I can't test it when the module is disabled.

  I can't properly test the latest version of RealDownloader; the module is disabled in FF 10. I have the latest version of RealDownloader, in which the incompatibility with FF10 is supposed to be fixed.

  Update to the latest version to get a version of the extension Plugin RealPlayer Record of the browser that is compatible with Firefox RealPlayer 10.

• I can't install the modules from the official site of mozilla Add-ons. I click 'Add to firefox' and nothing happens! Help!

  I can't install the modules from the official site of mozilla Add-ons. I click 'Add to firefox' and nothing happens!

  Hello

  Please check if a green icon is added to the left of the icon in the Web site address bar after clicking on Add to Firefox. If it appears, click it, check the message and select the desired action.

  Another reason could be that the extension could block Javascript or other features of the site.

• The module page should include the date at which each add-on has been more recently updated to help diagnose problems.

  Sorry, this isn't a question, but a suggestion. If a conflict exists between the modules, it would be useful to know that it has been updated recently. I often keep track of myself, but it would be easier to have this information on the page Add on.

  "Last update" is available from the display of the modules for each module by clicking on the "More" link... "just below the name of the add-on. Scroll down on this new view of the page.

  An add-on that lists information about all Extensions or Plugins, including the date of update (last updated date shows in the options for the Extension List Dumper as "Date of installation")

  • https://addons.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/addon/extension-list-Dumper/

  If this answer solved your problem, please click 'Solved It' next to this response when connected to the forum.

  Not related to your question, but...

  You may need to update some plug-ins. Check your plug-ins and update if necessary:

  • Plugin check-> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/
  • Adobe Shockwave for Director Netscape plug-in: install (or update) the Shockwave with Firefox plugin
  • Adobe PDF plugin for Firefox and Netscape: Installation/update Adobe Reader in Firefox
  • Shockwave Flash (Adobe Flash or Flash): updated Flash in Firefox
  • Next generation Java plug-in for the Mozilla browser: install or update Java in Firefox

• Are the modules the SMEs as the pop ups?

  Your 'help' sites speak of Add-ons. This morninng, that I could not open an E-mail because the quick scoring on screen says that my "pop-ups" were blocked.

  Hi Marie-Céline,

  Add - ons are not the same as pop-ups. Find and install add-ons to add functionality to Firefox gives you more information on the modules. They are similar to applications that add additional functionality to Firefox. The blocker is simply a tool used to prevent websites to open a new window without your permission. If you encounter a problem with the blocker, take a look at the article the blocker, exceptions and troubleshooting settings. It will show you how to use and manage the popup blocker in Firefox.

  Hope this helps!