Behavior of vector

Similar Questions

• is unable to scale a 3D vector length as you wish

  I try to view a vector 3D of a scene. I want the vector position, direction and length to vary with time. The home of the dmonstrates program it.  The position vector and the direction change as you wish, but the length does not change as you wish.  The problem may be clear, if you run the attached VI.  Basically, I create a vector oriented according to the Z axis.  With each time step, I change its length along Z, then translate it in the desired position, then turn it to the desired response.  The problem is that the cycles of component Z between 0 and 1, rather than the length of cycle between 0 and 1.

  I searched the forums for discussion of assistance, does not.

  I assumed that this situation occurs because the component most recently posted version of the vector z was being phased out, instead of scaling the vector of the component z of the INITIAL report, that points along the z axis.  That's why I tried to create 2 copies of the vector object.  A copy is the "variable" which is processed and displayed.  The other is kept not transformed.  At each stage of the stime, I copy that unprocessed to processed, and then transform.  This did not remedy the problem.  I tried to erase all the transformations at the end of each timestep - and this is the verion I my validation.  However, this does not have the problem.

  A solution I've seen for this problem is to create a new vector object during each time step, and then add it to the stage, and then resize it, translate and turn it.  Then, when it is displayed, the object is removed from the scene.  Then a new vector object is created for the next time step.  It seems mathematically inefficient and inelegant, and I'm worried about memory fills, since I would create a new object every 50 milliseconds.

  Two subVIs (DrawUnitArrow, DrawUnitAxes) are also attached.

  Thank you.

  In VI you posted, if you replace the "Set Rotation" with an 'object to turn' vi vi, I believe you get the desired behavior. (You probably also want to turn before translate you)

• Open MDF files in Diadem generated with vector couch v7.0?

  Hi all

  I have a sofa v7.0 vector data acquisition system that generates files in MDF format.  I found the Diadem data plugin for MDF files and installed.  I can open the files, I see the names of parameters, but all data is 0 (and do not).

  The plugin is updated and the description mentions MDF version 3.0 & 3.2.  We have couch version 7.0.  How do these numbers match?  How to correctly open this file?

  Description of the plugin:

  This use is supported for playback / import of files MDF Bosch of ETAS INCA® MDF and Vector sofa® data and other products of the vector. The use is supported by the MDF files up to version 3.2. Use MDF also supports the writing of MDF 3.0 and 3.2 files. Writing behavior is controlled by the root "version" property set the version of "MDF 3.2" to write files MDF 3.2.

  The measurement data Format (MDF) is well established in the automotive industry for recording, Exchange and analysis after measurement. MDF files are produced for example. Inca® ETAS, then in sofa® and other products of the vector.

  Thanks - Dshow

  P.S. I've tried this on tiara v10.1 and 11 with the same results.  THX

  Hi all

  Further examination of the file that worked and the files that don't work not revealed that the latest settings that we use is no longer.  Once we have removed these settings, I can open all the files, if we believe that it is the question.

  Thank you for your help.

• Vectors force to shut down

  Ultiboard V10.0, Power Pro,

  This question has probably been asked before, but is still annoying me,

  is it possible to disable the Force vectors at all times

  (I mean permanently while they appear not at all, once again, as I do not use this feature)

  the question also with check box rule ratsnest and design, but since these are complete once the circuit board is finished, it is less an annoying problem that Force vectors reappear whenever a file Ultiboard is open?

  does anyone know all the parameters in the registry of Ultiboard affecting this behavior?

  Multisim/Ulticap/Ultboard user for 10 years and more, help!

  Hello

  I get around this by changing the color of the black force vector, which is the same as the background color and I really don't have one notices.  Ultiboard will remember this setting if you start a new design, but if you open a file where the vector of force is a different color, it will take the new color by default, and you must change this setting again.

• Application of a policy of VSG when the vector signal generator is offline?

  How policies are applied when a vector signal generator is offline, make port profiles with an attached policy start VSG to abandon all traffic until the vector signal generator comes back online?

  VPath and vServices configuration

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/switches/Datacenter/VSG/SW/4_2_1_VSG_1_4_1/vpath_vservices/reference/guide/vpath_vservices_config.html

  The default value of failmode is close.

  Fail mode specifies the behavior when the MEC has no connectivity to the service node. The default fail mode for ASA 1000V and VSG is narrow, which means that the packets will be dropped. The default failure of vWAAS mode is open, which means that the packets will be passed. service nodes vPath 1.0 does not support service chaining. When you use a vPath 1.0 service node in a string, traffic to that node goes into failure.

  Thank you

  Responsible Dan

  Cisco IDP data center

  You want to know more about how the PDI can help you?

  http://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=4BebSCuxcQU&list=PL88EB353557455BD7

  http://www.Cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

• For picture adjustment behavior changed?

  Hello

  I looked for answers to my problem without success.

  I'm in InDesign 2015.3 Release.

  10.10.5 OSX

  My problem is that when I place the vector illustrations in indesign, the content frame adapts to the artboard, not art on the artboard.

  I am used to a different default behavior where the placed vector content adjusts to the art.

  In addition, when trying to fit the frame to the content, the framework fits again to the artboard.

  Is it a setting I am missing, or a change in software?

  It's quite disturbing for my workflow for various reasons!

  Thanks in advance for any help offered.

  Fitting has depends on the options of crops selected when you place at the beginning of the work, which can be accessed by checking the box show the Options or by holding down SHIFT when you click OK in the Place dialog box. Your choice is "sticky" until you change and apply to the PDF and AI files.

• Vector Illustrator to Photoshop Smart objects is more editable...?

  I've just updated my CC and experiencing some weird behaviors between Illustrator and Photoshop. I always start in Illustrator to make my designs (logos, etc. for the vector art) and then build in Photoshop for brochures and other media. I always copied and pasted as smart objects (from Illustrator into Photoshop) and production wise, this is a quick easy workflow - I can go back and change my smart objects by clicking twice if necessary changes.

  However, after update CC two days ago, I feel something I've never seen. When I paste the graphic Illustrator (such as a smart object) I can no longer double-click the layer to edit in Illustrator - I am panic and need help! What they have done or what has changed? It's ruining my workflow and I would really appreciate the help. The alert script error I get when I double click on the vector smart object is "this element is not directly editable in photoshop, but it can be placed in a document. To move the item, drag it into an open document. "Why I'm doing this and why they would change?

  Help, please

  Julie

  JuJuGrafiks wrote:

  The interest to place the vector in Photoshop is not hunting for the dynamic object - it is much too long and then go back to Illustrator. It is a step in the wrong direction, and I can't believe that others are not upset. I would not have updated if I had known this - now my production is at a standstill immensely. Is there a way to express my concerns?

  Your first message is at odds with your last. You said in your first post that you double-click to edit a vector pasted in Photoshop into Illustrator. Then you say you want to go back to Illustrator and "hunt for the object."

  As long as you have the option "add to my current library" unchecked when pasting, it should work as before. Is there something I'm missing here?

• InDesign for Acrobat version 5.0 - vectors to rasterized them PDF edition

  I was wondering if someone could answer this question.

  Here is the PDF file

  Dropbox - Untitled - 5.pdf

  When you go to edit the PDF using Acrobat DC, and then click the vector image, then the vector image is rasterised.

  See 6 Untitled

  Dropbox - without title-6

  In the test, I used an EPS from Illustrator and one of THE side by side, and they are identical.

  There is a button on the editing panel in ' Image back turning again to a vector.

  But if you save the PDF file the frame stays in place on the screen.

  A very strange and undesirable behavior is for me - is it possible to change this?

  Hi Eugene,

  As there is no way to avoid this behavior in Acrobat DC right now (you would have to "go back to the Image' in this case), I ask you to log a bug in http://www.adobe.com/products/wishform.html.

  Thank you

  Ankit - prom

• Vectors in the shared library now appear as a "smart object" when you drag a PSD document in 2015

  When they added the library I was overjoyed but now with CC 2015 when I drag my vector objects from my library in a PSD document they no longer drop as a vector but a variant of a dynamic object (has an icon of cloud beside him). It is very undesirable because I need to be able to use these vectors in sizes very easily without having to edit a smart object each time. Is it possible outside decommissioning to 2014 to change this behavior in the libraries?

  All my libraries were created in 2014 CC photoshop vectors. I use all of the other CC apps with libraries.

  Dragging an asset library creates a linked smart object that can only be changed if you open the assets of the cloud. If you hold down the Alt/opt, you get the old way and a local copy of this asset which can be edited in PS.

• Help with movement of sprite forced on the edge of an irregular shape of bitmap or vector.

  Hello

  I need to be able to restrict the movement of a "wheel" along the edge of an irregular bitmap or vector shape. In addition, as the "wheel" moves along the way, it should return the length of the path travelled in pixels.

  What it is for is to demonstrate the extent of what is called the "range of vision." The process involves moving two rods share sighting until the lower part of one is no longer visible on the other, then running a wheel odometer along the road alignment irregular to measure the distance of moving real between the two rods.

  I was able to complete the first part of the present, with two rods connected by a "visibility" moved out on an irregular shape vector until the distance of visibility becomes invisible. And it returns the distance the two stems are separated by, feet, using 1 pixel = 1 foot. A segment of this film is reproduced below. The wheel should run on the gray slopes after the Red sight line disappears as it is moved over the Hill.

  

  Of course, the wheel on the edge of the irregular shape and the actual distance of the way back in pixels are the hardest part of this. I remember James Newton and others had developed several methods to constrain the movement of a sprite on the edge of another form. But I could not find these behaviors. In addition, I know calculate the distance travelled by the wheel is going to be a bit complicated, as I suspect, it will need to calculate the hypotenuse of several rise and run triangles, with new triangles added when changing the direction of the irregular surface.

  Can anyone offer help at least getting the traffic restricted to a sprite("wheel") along the edge of the shape bitmap or vector?

  Thanks in advance.

  Rod Wolford

  Hi Rod,

  Maybe you are looking for this:

  http://nonlinear.OpenSpark.com/tips/dragging/irregular/

  In addition, I know calculate the distance travelled by the wheel is going to be a bit complicated, as I suspect, it will need to calculate the hypotenuse of several rise and run triangles, with new triangles added when changing the direction of the irregular surface.

  How irregular is your form is going to be? If it's just a series of triangles, then it should be simple. If you know in advance what triangles are going to be, then it is even simpler.

  Maybe you can find some inspiration here:

  go film ("http://nonlinear.openspark.com/tips/other/irregularLength.dir")

  Can you give examples of the way in which the irregular surface must be created?

  See you soon,.

  James

• Digital watercolor into a vector?

  How can I activate a watercolor scanned in a vector based graphic?

  I used the tracing, but it took only the dark parts of the image and turned into black...

  Thank you in advance for your help!

  demnoni,

  You must explore/try the settings of trace to modify its behavior.

• Question about the functionality of vector mask

  Hello everyone, I'm fairly new to Photoshop CS 5 so I apologize if I'm asking the wrong type of questions, here goes:

  When you work with vector masks you can:

  (1) "the link" or a vector mask with the other images? ' sharing ' a picture (for example) if I did 'A Building' then duplicated, but wanted to change what build a looked like, I have to only change the mask of the source, then the copies would be updated.

  (2) move the independent image of the vector mask (it seems that I can only move the vector mask, not the image itself). Or in other words: I can move the image and have the mask to follow, instead of being only able to move the vector mask within the limits of the image?

  My application of the question:

  I do a top-down 2D layout of a zone of type "Paste". I did to fill the buildings, building A, B, C, etc. and use multiple copies of each building. Ideally, I would like to be able to 'link' or share say building has a vector mask with all other instances of building A (so that when I change the master, they all change to the new form of mask). The second behavior I have trying to find is the ability to move without moving layer where the vector mask is on this layer (since it seems that you can only move where the mask is, which means that even if I could share masks, they all finish by in the same sense of place I have to re - position each hand again.)

  Any ideas are appreciated, thank you for reading.

  When you work with vector masks you can:

  (1) "the link" or a vector mask with the other images? ' sharing ' a picture (for example) if I did 'A Building' then duplicated, but wanted to change what build a looked like, I have to only change the mask of the source, then the copies would be updated.

  Yes, it's possible, but not with the classic system layer vector mask in Photoshop. Layer masks are part of a layer and not the layers themselves, so that they can be converted into a reusable object.

  The solution is to avoid vector layer masks and use a clipping/layer instead mask. A clipping/layer mask CAN be converted into a smart object that is reusable, and when you change one, all the other instances are also changing.

  The second part of the solution is to convert the layers contained both the clipping/layer to a smart object mask. Then the batch group. By the way, if your buildings are made up of several elements simply to include these additional elements in the clipping group. Another advantage is that each of the elements may still have its own normal layer mask. Win win situation. And layer effects can be applied to layers/clipping masks, once again what is impossible for layer masks. It also opens the doors to a much less destructive workflow.

  (2) move the independent image of the vector mask (it seems that I can only move the vector mask, not the image itself). Or in other words: I can move the image and have the mask to follow, instead of being only able to move the vector mask within the limits of the image?

  This is also solved with the use of layers/clipping masks - the content and the mask can be moved independently in regular layers. Another advantage is that the two can also be transformed individually.

  My application of the question:

  I do a top-down 2D layout of a zone of type "Paste". I did to fill the buildings, building A, B, C, etc. and use multiple copies of each building. Ideally, I would like to be able to 'link' or share say building has a vector mask with all other instances of building A (so that when I change the master, they all change to the new form of mask). The second behavior I have trying to find is the ability to move without moving layer where the vector mask is on this layer (since it seems that you can only move where the mask is, which means that even if I could share masks, they all finish by in the same sense of place I have to re - position each hand again.)

  Any ideas are appreciated, thank you for reading.

  So here's my solution. I made a sample with two buildings, the view from above which could be reused as desired:

  (1) first of all create groups for each building and place the content to those. Then trace layer vector shapes on the content. Set the transparency for layers of mask to a reasonable of opacity for masking easier.

  

  (2) put the vector shape under the layer of content for each building. Then, for (1) and (2), , click on the border between the content and the shape layer. (for Mac), this will hide the enrichment of the content. (3) remember to layer for shape layers opacity to 100%!

  

  (3) then we will turn this building into recyclable items. Convert each content and layer to a smart object clipping mask. Then rename these layers of dynamic object into something sensible (honestly, I forgot to label the layers well earlier, but you catch my meaning here ;-)

  

  Fact! To clone each building, duplicate layer groups. For each instance that you can move the content (which is handy if you share multiple charts of building in the same bitmap or illustrator file), or you can decide to move the mask in place. Or both. It is the same for the transformation. Your choice. To move or transform a building, select the layer group.

  To change or modify the masks or the contents, double-click the smart object of your choice and make a few changes.

  Also, remember that you can insert additional elements in a clipping group by placing it over the first layer and then clipped by clicking again on the border between them. So, in theory, you could start building different looking buildings by adding other dynamic objects in clipping groups. The sky is the limit! In this way, you can create several building blocks to build various buildings with different looks. And still limit the number of blocks - and any update-able.

  Unfortunately, that's when the workflow breaks down a bit: due to the implementation of the object dynamic in Photoshop, you can't change the mask or the contents of the building in context - instead, it opens in its own window of file. This can be somewhat mitigated by placing the two windows side by side (window-> fix--> double vertical installation).

  This brings us to the second caveat: when you make a change, the changes are not updated in real time in the master document. You must first save it. Still a bit of a flow of work, but when same breaker... At least you now have a workflow not destructive instantiated.

  The content of the dynamic object can be replaced easily with a right-click of the mouse on the smart object layer itself. Or use a dynamic object referenced externally instead if you prefer to generate your buildings in an external application.

  BTW, the layer of Photoline system is much more logical and easier to use for this type of work. Layer masks behave like regular diapers. Layers, groups, masks, layers of external file and so forth can be practically cloned and instantiated as smart objects, but the main object is editable in the context, and all the other instances updated in real time. So, it is more convenient. At least this is my experience.

  I hope this has been helpful! Now go build your cities. :-)

  PS: I thought: isn't Illustrator or InDesign is a much more logical choice for this type of work where you need access to reusable blocks of content? It would also be a more efficient workflow and faster - Photoshop is not really designed for this type of work. Illustrator and InDesign provide potentially out of better quality. You can also divide your work into the pages and so on. Here again, you would probably lose the flexibility of smart objects.

• After effects Import vector continuously rasterize works not

  Hello.

  I try to import a vector in After Effects, and it doesn't work the way I need. Yes, I continuously rasterize lit. Without the file original Illustrator has no effects on it. I tried png, eps, psd files and. Same question.

  1. it's what GOT the original vector file looks like:

  

  2. This is what it looks like in AE with continuously rasterize lit, with 400% zoom. It's shitty.

  

  3 and this is what it looks like AE zoomed in to 100%, but I put to scale the image up to 200%.

  

  But I can't use the vector of huge scale for my project because it is too big for my computer. If anyone can help? My brain hurts.

  I realize that this shit in the observer of AE, but even after I have the export in HD, there always look miserable.

  Basically, I want to just a nice final clean air picture in my computer.

  Hey thanks for all those who can help you. Waves enormous karma coming your way.

  When questions like this just posted a screenshot of the result is almost useless in diagnosing the problem. A better screenshot would include the Comp window and timeline with the layer selected question and all changed properties revealed by pressing the U key twice. In addition, since it was an imported file is concerned, if the footage item is selected in the project Panel and then we can get an idea of the shape, size and other properties of the original file that can cause problems.

  You should not have to buy anything to get correctly created vector files it work perfectly in your composition. When you said zoomed to 400%, if you meant the scale factor and not to scale the layer so the behavior is normal, expected, and exactly what should be the case. 400% zoom factor means that the comp window uses 16 pixels of the screen for each pixel of the model. Magnification set to 1600% means that a single image pixel appears as a block of 16 X 16 pixels of the screen - so that things will look pixelated when they are not. The only way to judge the quality is to look at the compose window with the Zoom set to 100% factor. It is exactly how Photoshop works.

  Here's what I mean. A single layer of Illustrator selected, scaled 5174% and perfectly pixelated in a comp with the Zoom factor to 100% scale. Note the size of the layer in the project Panel. All we need to know to diagnose a problem.

  

• Vector in Java 5 is probably * not * synchronized (because of his copy-ctor)

  Hello
  
  the Java 5 API documentation states that "Vector" is synchronized (in fact: older versions of State that as well). But with the final-version Java JDK 5 1.5.0_22, I get the following output to the Console for Testclass below (probably because the copy of the vector constructor is not synchronized, and so the whole class is not synchronized - please correct me if I'm wrong). Note: The iterator only works on the copy, the static vector is not accessible by iterators than by its members-operations. The interruption of the loop happens naturally because there is a concurreny in the copy constructor causing "null" error - values inserted in the copied vector.
  
  Console output:
  
  Hand-Thread has started.
  NULL-element found.
  Reading-Thread is finished.
  Hand-Thread is finished.
  Writing-Thread is finished.
  
  When executing next Testclass:
  

  import java.util.Iterator;
  import java.util.Vector;
  import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
  
  public class VectorTest extends Thread {
    private static CountDownLatch terminateMainThread = new CountDownLatch(1);
    private static final Vector<String> v = new Vector<String>();
    private boolean writeMode;
    private static boolean endless;
    public VectorTest(boolean writeMode) {
            this.writeMode = writeMode;
            endless = true;
    }
    public void run() {
            if (writeMode) {
                    while (endless) {
                            for (int i=1; i<= 10000; i++) {
                                    v.add("DummyString");
                            }
                            while (v.size()>1000) {
                                    v.remove(v.firstElement());
                            }
                    }
                    System.out.println("Write-Thread terminated.");
            } else {
                    while (endless) {
                            Vector<String> copy = new Vector<String>(v);
                            Iterator<String> it = copy.iterator();
                            while (it.hasNext()) {
                                    if (it.next()==null) {
                                            System.out.println("null-element found.");
                                            endless = false;
                                            terminateMainThread.countDown();
                                            break;
                                    }
                            }
                    }
                    System.out.println("Read-Thread terminated.");
            }
    }
    public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
            System.out.println("Main-Thread started.");
            VectorTest w = new VectorTest(true);
            VectorTest r = new VectorTest(false);
            w.start();
            r.start();
            terminateMainThread.await();
            System.out.println("Main-Thread terminated.");
    }
  }

  I can't reproduce this behavior using newer Java versions (for them, only "Hand-Thread started." is off, and the application runs without end), it's this presumable bug is likely to be fixed since some Java version 6.

  It was indeed a bug in earlier versions. If you have JDK 5 src.zip and later, compare the implementation of the constructor in java/util/Vector.java. It is not difficult to see how it can fail.

• When I use the selection tool to move vector points and fold the edges, I see that the change in metal frame.

  When I use the selection tool to move vector points and fold the edges, I see that the change in metal frame.  Once I commit by letting go of the mouse button, the object changes.  It presents a preview just with a wire frame. I would like to see the preview to change on the solid object.  Is there a setting somewhere?

  I really hope I'm explaining this to people to understand .

  Thank you

  Ed

  Hi Ed,

  You use a previous version of Flash Pro that displays this behavior.

  Live the overview of forms while editing got added in Flash Pro CC (and above). You can try the latest version of Flash Pro (CC 2014) see how it works.