Best HP with a resolution full hd and SSD?

Similar Questions

• Dropped frames with 980TI, very fast processor and SSD

  Hi all

  I'm currently editing some 4 K and 1080 cineform film scan 1 sequences on a 1080 p timeline, the things is I have a lot of dropped frames, when using plugins (Accelerated ones) stock on adjustment layers, sometimes even on the clip to...

  Is this normal given the CPU goes from 80 to 100%, but the GPU is just over 40%?

  My equipment is:

  8.1 to Windows and the latest demo of first Pro CC

  2600K @4, 5 ghz

  12 GB of ram (could be the cause)

  GTX980ti (Stable OC)

  Vertex SSD for the OS

  SAMSUNG SSD for the project and sequences (Blackmagic speed test shows constant ~490 mb writing ~ 520 MB read)

  Thank you all

  Clock speeds are not a reliable indicator of processor speeds - they hit a ceiling a few years back really, so they found other ways to make processors faster and more efficient without increasing the clock speed.

  Your 2600K is a Core i7 2nd generation with 4 cores and 8 wires, while the most recent 5th-Gen 5820 K 6 cores/12 threads, but "only" a 3.6 Ghz compared to your 4.5 Ghz clock speed, but what one do you think is faster?

  You will probably need a new motherboard for the processor more recent, but even if required do not, would be prudent or the old motherboard would be a performance bottleneck. Most recent MB would be faster RAM. And get at least 16 GB of RAM, if not more.

  You want a system that is "balanced", which means that all the components complement each other. You don't get full of the GTX 980, since performance the old processor and motherboard are dragging it down like a boat anchor. Like putting a Corvette engine in a Chevrolet Vega old... you won't have any suspension, steering, braking, traction to handle all that power and will not be able to open up the throttle! With the new CPU, MB and ram, you would have a more balanced system. A Hot Rod. You can even add another drive, or both, for example, the media Cache.

  Check under file > Project Settings > General to see if the GPU rendering is enabled, or if the value to the software - cannot even make use of the 980 for acceleration card.

  Thank you

  Jeff

• Best practices with the virtual directories CFIDE and Jakarta

  Right now I'm going through implementation of our new virtualized ColdFusion 10 Application/Web/database server, and I noticed that during installation, since I had 'Connect all IIS sites' selected, he created maps of handler for each, but each also gave a virtual directory for "CFIDE" and "Jakarta".

  Best practices guides told to restrict access to the "adminapi', 'administrator', 'componentutils' and 'wizards' records under the CFIDE directory, but is - it safe to simply remove these virtual directories (and leave the mappings Manager) so that sites can always treat the types of file associated with CF?

  1 the site we have is the default localhost is linked to, I felt I would just let these virtual directories, since to reach CF ACP this server, we'd have to goto: http://localhost/CFIDE/administrator/index.cfm

  I know that if a file from a site needs to access things like file CFScripts, CF will automatically take the virtual directory is there and create < script > tags use a src of "/ CFIDE/scripts" (which if I remove this virtual directory, would break the functionality, but assuming that I do not use this technology to other sites) It removes "CFIDE" and "Jakarta" is going to hurt anything?

  Look at the Guide of ColdFusion 9 Lockdown that Pete Freitag wrote.  A large part of it still applies to the 10 ColdFusion, especially security aspects of IIS.  There is an article on the creation of filters of aggregate demand which allows you to block access to most (or all) of the subdirectories in CFIDE.

  Regarding the Jakarta virtual directory, you need this one.  That's what allows the IIS connector to function.

  -Carl V.

• U2713HM, max resolution with a laptop without DVI and DisplayPort?

  This is the type of response to a previous post with the same title.  However, the interface of the forum does not seem to allow a response on older posts, even if they remained unanswered and have customers.  Ho-hum. In any case, I discovered that I can drive the U2713HM using a simple HDMI cable to your laptop using the interface of view nVidia Control Panel (page 'Change resolution') property and setting a custom resolution to match the full 2560 x 1440. The trick is to use the Customize button and create a 'custom resolution' for the progressive 32 bits 2560 x 1440, use 'Automatic' and then drop the (Hz) refresh rate up to about 38 to 41 Hz. To find one that works and then keep trying new in 1 Hz increments until it fails. I'm at the wheel of a laptop Toshiba Qosmio, using its output using a refresh of 41 Hz. frequency something higher and display will not 'lock-in' to its native resolution HDMI (available only) the screen (normally connected by Dual link DVI to a desktop machine). So allow me to use the input on the screen switch to switch between my desktop PC and laptop. Works a treat!

  Just thought I would add that:

  This may be possible with a workaround to other problems of option cable - for example, poor quality or cables of big length - where the main problem is one of the supported by the cable or the type of interface bandwidth.  By lowering the refresh rate, you are lowering the bandwidth requirement.  For old CRT screens, it usually resulted in a significant - not so remarkable gradation with LCD/LED technology!  And don't forget that the eye can integrate cini-film at rates as low as 25 Hz!  Affecting the refresh rate of 30 to 48 Hz on a LCD/LED modern is now a viable solution for the problems of bandwidth of cable. Note, however, that all the problems can be addressed by here: for example, I got a cable from DVI single-link for which no stable frequency could be found (the monitor really need Dual - Link DVI - one with a full set of pines).

• Hi, im working with 2 1920 * 1080 monitors and you want to display a background thar image is on a resolution of 3840 * 1080 and I wanted to be half on each monitor. can u help me?

  Hi, im working with 2 1920 * 1080 monitors and you want to display a background thar image is on a resolution of 3840 * 1080 and I wanted to be half on each monitor. can u help me?

  Friday, July 20, 2012 14:35:27 + 0000, GastonBriatore wrote:

  Hi, im working with 2 1920 * 1080 monitors and you want to display a background thar image is on a resolution of 3840 * 1080 and I wanted to be half on each monitor. can u help me?

  Windows does not allow you this. However, you might be able to find a
  third party program that could do this.

  Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP

• I'm running a full scan of the system with my anti-virus software and it filled almost my laptop crashes, problem with the vga865.fon file

  I'm running a full scan of the system with my anti-virus software and it filled almost my laptop breaks down when it comes to: -.

  c:\windows\winsxs\x86_microsoft-Windows-font-bitmap-oem_31bf3856ad364e35_6.0.6000.16386_none_fb2d5aefb17b8d65\vga865.FON

  This file can be replaced.  When I scan this folder individually its fine, please help

  Thank you

  Hello

  What protection software antivirus you are running on the computer?

  Method 1: Check if you can run the scan in safe mode without in all questions

  Follow the steps mentioned in the link below to access the secure mode
  Startup options (including safe mode)

  Method 2: you can run Safe Mode security monitor, see the steps in the article below
  How to install the free Windows Live OneCare Safety Scanner and then scan your computer in Mode safe

  Method 3: Follow the steps mentioned in the link below to check your hard disk for errors, and then check if the problem is resolved
  Check your hard drive for errors

  If the problem persists,

  Method 4: Long file name could cause this problem, perform a backup of the file (copy it somewhere else), and then rename the file, check to see if that makes a difference

  Note: Copy the file to the original location.

  Thank you, and in what concerns:

  Ajay K

  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  ***************************************************************************
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Internet access with VPN Client to ASA and full effect tunnel

  I'm trying to migrate our concentrator at our new 5520 s ASA. The concentrator has been used only for VPN Client connections, and I have not the easiest road. However, I, for some reason, can't access to internet through our business network when I've got profiles with lots of tunneling.

  I've included the configuration file, with many public IP information and omitted site-to-site tunnels. I left all the relevant stuff on tunnel-groups and group strategies concerning connectivity of VPN clients. The range of addresses that I use for VPN clients is 172.16.254.0/24. The group, with what I'm trying to access the internet "adsmgt" and the complete tunnel to our network part is fine.

  As always, any help is appreciated. Thank you!

  Hüseyin... good to see you come back.. bud, yes try these Hüseyin sugesstiong... If we looked to be ok, we'll try a different approach...

  IM thinking too, because complete tunnel is (no separation) Jim ASA has to go back for the outbound traffic from the internet, a permit same-security-traffic intra-interface, instruction should be able to do it... but Jim start by Hüseyin suggestions.

  Rgds

  Jorge

• What would be the best camera for light low, good zoom and footage

  Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V
  Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100

  I'd love the RX100 but now for nearly $700

  DSC-HX50 would be the best option for your needs. It has also many interesting features. It is integrated with optical zoom 30 x and 60 x Zoom of Digital Image clear.

  This device has a 20.4 million pixels image CMOS Exmor R sensor that brings out the full resolving power of the lens of the camera to offer extremely fast speed, high resolution Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T, and a great sensitivity in low light with improved and drastically reduced grain image clarity.

  You can find detailed information on the features of the two cameras at the bottom of the links:

  http://store.Sony.com/webapp/WCS/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?langid=-1&SearchType=search&StoreID=1...

  http://store.Sony.com/webapp/WCS/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?langid=-1&SearchType=search&StoreID=1...

  If my post answered your question, please mark it as "acceptable Solution".

• Connectivity with AT &amp; T-Motorola 3360 and Airport Extreme problems

  Bought a new extreme-Airport (7.7.3) to replace my old AE after 9 years of service.  The installation procedure, but could not get the airport to connect with my modem (Motorola 3360).  Called at & T and they crossed put me the modem in Bridge mode and which seemed to work.  But only temporarily (about 5 hours).  Restart the modem and the airport was not working.  Troubleshooting I tried to plug my MacBook directly into the modem, but even the computer couldn't get an internet connection.  Another call to AT & T and they reconfigure the modem to their end.  After 90 minutes and try everything they could, they have finally admitted defeat and told me that they could not solve the problem.

  However, after a fairly exhaustive search of this forum, seems to be two issues that many people is with Airport extreme.  One is that the modem (in this case a Motorola 3360) is perhaps not fully compatible with the airport.  The AT & T support person was not aware of this until I asked about it, so she did a quick search and was rather surprised to see that there is a lot of people having problems with the Motorola Modem.  She told me that they use no more Motorola modems but ship the 6200 of Netgear.  "All know issues?", I asked.  She sought and, to his surprise, even once, there was.

  So, first question.  Does anyone know a modem that is compatible with the airport or use one that they had to limit problems with?

  The second question prevailing seems to be with the IPv6 protocol.  Anyone know if there are problems with the AT & T IPv6 protocol and the most extreme airport?  I did not disable IPv6 yet to see if that helps.  I thought I'd ask here first.  Couldn't find anything on the AT & T site.

  When I return from the road (great place to go to get away from technology) I will make a new round of full power of all the components and try Setup again from scratch.

  Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  Miss all know profanity.

  Thank you.

  Any other relevant information: 6.3.1 the utility Airport, Airport Extreme 7.7.3, MacBook Pro running 10.8.4, modem Motorola 3360, AT & T high speed DSL, shoe size 11-1/2 wide.

  When you have configured the 3360 as a 'bridge', this would mean that the AirPort Extreme should then be put in place to provide the PPPoE connection service. The airports are not known for their reliability in this type of installation... no matter the type of modem that you can select, so I drop this method as a connection option.

  If you want to keep the 3360... and you have time to experiment... then you can set the 3360 to its original default settings and configure the router from the airport most convenient to connect using DHCP in router Mode of DHCP and NAT.  That will produce what is called a message Double NAT, but maybe it's not of concern on a simple home network, and Apple provides you with the option 'Ignore' the Double NAT, so the airport will display a green light instead a light orange blinking slow.

  You need to try this configuration for a few days to see if the Double NAT will be a problem or not, because it is not possible to predict the effect of a Double NAT on a network... you have to test a few days see how things behave.  If this configuration works well, for you, then you can leave it as what.

  Please note that I do not recommend this type of installation, just suggesting it as an option this work could , if you want to keep the 3360.

  How Double NAT affect IPv6, I can't tell, since I did not use att for several years, and I'm not familiar with their implementation. On wired, IPv6 works fine on the airport with Comcast and Time Warner.  We can provide these parameters for you if want, but have no idea how well... (or if)... they will work with ATT.

  If the installation of Double NAT does not work, your best option would be to go there and get a modem/router or gateway to ATT device and then set up the most convenient airport in Bridge Mode works correctly with the modem/router ATT.  You will turn on the routing of ATT function in this type of installation, but the airport can also produce a signal from the wireless network that you can use.  The modem/router ATT will also provide a wireless signal that you could use for guests, or disable the feature, if you do not need two wireless networks.

  This may also be the best option if you want to configure IPv6 as IPv6 of ATT service must be compatible with the modems/routers and gateways.

• H satellite L505-13 - problem with the resolution of games

  Hello, I have a problem with the resolution of games, I just that:
  800 x 600 and 1024 x 768
  Yet, I have the latest version of the ati driver and directx 11...

  Windows Dectet my monitor properly (plug-and-play), and my screen resolution works well for: 1366 x 768 and 800 x 600.
  on the other hand, when I start a game I have only the choice between these two resolution: 800 x 600 and 1024 x 768...

  All the games don t fit the full screen and there is always a black area on the right and left.

  Some games (crash)... and I thought it made a link with said that I have only 2 resolution.

  I have a toshiba L505 - h - 13 (PSLS9E)
  my graphics card: ati mobility radeon hd 5145 graphics card
  OS: win 7 32 bit

  I hope someone can help me find a solution
  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  I put t know what games you want to play, but generally speaking, it of also depending on the game you can use screen resolutions. For example if your game supports only 2 screen resolutions, you can only use these resolutions.

  So all you can do is update the driver DirectX and display. Then, look for an update (patch) for the game.

  Good luck! :)

• m8120n with a resolution of Dell U2711 Max

  I bought a Dell U2711, tested the monitor on another system with success and get a maximum resolution of 2560 x 11440.  When plugged up to the HP with a Dual Link DVI cable, somehow I can't get 1600 x 1050.  When hooked up via a VGA cable I get 2048 x 1152.  I contacted Dell, reduced to HP itself (not much help from Dell if they tried).  I've updated the drivers for the monitor and the graphics card, Geforce 7350, nothing does.

  (Ah, FYI, I searched the forum, found nothing on this subject, my warranty is also up.)

  From another thread, it's because of the card ATI 6570, set up with an Nvidia GT 430 has solved the problem.  Don't know if this applies to me since for some reason any VGA got better resolution, as well as the HDMI Jack.  (Oh yes, I also tested the cables on another system, works very well it)

  Here are the specifications of your HP Pavilion Media Center m8120n desktop. According to the specifications, the computer came from the factory

  GeForce 7350LE

  1 - DVI (and VGA with included adapter)
  2 S-video (and video Composite using adapter SV-CV)
  Interface: PCI Express x 16
  Maximum resolution:
  DVI (single bond capable): 1920 x 1440 @ 60 Hz with reduced shutter
  TV (S-video or Composite video): 1024 x 768 interlaced

  As stated in the specs, DVI is a unique link with a resolution of 1920 x 1440 max. It's not affecting your monitor, but 1600 x 1050 is perhaps the best compromise between the two. Please install a new graphics capable DVI (DL) double bond to support higher screen resolutions.

• Tecra S10: undefined screen with a resolution of 1280 x 800

  Hi all,

  I have a strange problem with the resolution of my Tecra S10.

  My system:

  * Windows Vista, later lowered to Windows XP SP3 with the last update
  * Latest Toshiba nvidia drivers

  My default resolution is 1680 x 1050 initially and the display is sharp and perfect proportional to the screen (15.4 ", 16Million color), even if the icons are quite small.

  I changed my resolution of 1280 x 800 using the steps described in the user manual. But the screen is fuzzy and ill-defined.
  According to the manual of Toshiba (Tecra S10 Satellite Pro S300) my NVidia video card supports the resolution of 1280 x 800 WXGA mode.

  How can I put mode WXGA?

  I appreciate all suggestions that solves the problem.

  Best regards
  Biagio

  Hello

  To be honest you write on this is certainly not a problem but something usual for views. The display will be sharp and perfect when you set the view to the native resolution only.
  If you choose some other low or high resolution the illustrious office will be either too big (does not fit in the display) or will be blurred.

  The same situation is on my Tecra M1. Test it on all laptops, and the situation will be the same. I'm now working on Satellite P200 with 17 inch screen. For this display's native resolution is 1440 x 900.
  When I reduce the resolution the office is always fuzzy and ill-defined.

• Satellite of swapping screen LCD L850-150 to another with more resolution?

  Hello

  I am owner of a Toshiba L850-150, with a screen resolution of 1366 x 768 and I want to know if it is possible to change the Lcd display to another with more resolution, say a panel that is capable of displaying a resolution of full HD 1920 * 1080.

  I think that the graphics card has enough power to deal with. (No pun intended)

  Hello

  Graphics chip is able to handle a higher resolution, and I think it should be possible to change the LCD screen.
  You certainly need a 15.6 LCD.

  But the new LCD isn't cheap part I mean isn t better buy an external monitor and connect the laptop to the such full HD screen?

• layout with different resolutions

  Hello and Hello!

  Once more I need some advice:

  I have a program that is running on different machines with different resolutions.

  Is it possible to avoid, that the provision is paning all around?

  Best regards

  Hilby

  Hi Hilby,

  No.... This is currently a limitation of the layout, where we try to adapt to each screen, but objects and the page layout is not appropriate in different proportions with a different number of pixels.

  The aspect ratio is the most important, followed by the total of the resolution of the screen.

  Additional information about elongation are below.

  In summary, DASYLab is unable to completely adapt the layout "Screen" for the size of each screen and resolution. If you want to have a fixed provision which is not completely in some monitors, then consider using a size fixed, such as A4 or A3.

  If you do something on a large monitor, 1600 x 1200, for example, and move it to a screen wide monitor, 1600 x 900.

  Of my friends on Wikipedia

  With computer screens, wider than 4:3 aspect ratios are also known as widescreen. Computer monitors widescreen previously generally 16:10 aspect ratio, now they are moving in 16:9.

  Until the about 2003, most computer monitors had a 4:3 aspect ratio and some had 5:4. Between 2003 and 2006, monitors with 16:9 and especially 16:10 aspect ratios (8:5) became commonly available

• PCI 5153 - Question about resolution / full scale

  Hello and I hope it's the right subforum.

  I am currently looking for data that we recorded using a digitizer NI PCI-5153. I noticed one thing, it is that there is a difference between claimed resolution / full scale range and in fact, what has been recorded.

  We run to 0.2 V pk - pk and in this configuration, I see that each step of the digitizer is actually 0.8593 mV instead of the expected 0, 2V / 256 = 0,78125 mV.

  Right now I have all the available data that extends beyond - 0.1V or + 0.1V, so I can't study if the full scale is actually closer to 0.22V pk - pk or if there are only 233 ~ steps available to the digitizer. This isn't a deal breaker, but it would be good to know what is happening. Can anyone help? Or did I just miss something in the manual?

  And the beach to the other parameters of the full scale would also be longer than 10%?

  Thank you very much!

  Björn

  Hello

  After some research, I found that our measurable range is usually larger than the nominal range of 4 to 5 percent. I recalculated the size of bearing with this in mind and I got results that are close to what see you. So I think you see behavior expected on your device.