Best sequence of mixed size?

Similar Questions

• ESXI4 installation, best practices RAID, Stripe size, VD, the partitions?

  Hi all

  I have server Dell Poweredge PE2970 with PERC6 / I and PERC6/E RAID controllers.

  and the Bay of Dell Powerwault MD1000 storage.

  PERC6 / I is conducted 6 x 150 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA drives. (560 GB RAID 6) and,

  PERC6/E is engine x 15 x 1 TB 5400 RPM, SATA drives. (12 to RAID 6)

  This combination is used to provide iSCSI and NFS services for film and music production environment.

  I plan to create 3x100Gb, 1x200Gb, and 1x60Gb virtual disks of 560 GB RAID 6 array.

  60 GB to install VMware ESXI4 and StorMagic SvSAN.

  100 GB for virtual machines (Linux, Windows, NFS, AD, backup, servers etc.)

  100 GB for Audio iSCSI (work Pro Tools disk)

  100 GB for video iSCSI (work Pro Tools disk)

  200 GB for iSCSI Virtual Instruments (used by Pro tools)

  and 6 x 2 TB of storage, backups, etc.

  How to create these virtual disks when I create RAID arrays?

  What Strip size to use?

  How about this VD 60 'system' VD ESXI4 and SvSAN, or 100 GB 'virtual machine' for other servers?

  I had to do it like this, or should I create a 160 GB VD, for all the servers and facilities of ESXI?

  or should I create a VD to each their own?

  I mean like VD 1 GB for ESXI4, 25 GB (two partitions of 5 GB and 20 GB) VD for SvSAN, VD (two partitions 40 GB and 40 GB) 80 GB for Windows server.

  5 GB VD for Audio Linux NFS, 100 GB VD for iSCSI server, etc. In this solution, I could choose a different distribution for each VD size.

  I know this isn't the best solution, and in the future I could replace all the drives 10,000 rpm with fast SSDS 32 GB (128 GB RAID6)

  for the system and servers, and have a second table MD1000 for iSCSI disks dedicated 10,000 rpm. But for now, it's how to deal with.

  All suggestions and advice are welcome.

  Concerning

  Petzu

  We create a 5120 MB vd for esxi installation.  5121 actually like the perc bios rounds.

  Then we can recreate all installing esxi without touching anything else.

  The virtual machine are limited in the size of their maximum vmdk. For example, you could create just the minimum number of data warehouses.

  Keep it simple and straightforward unless you have a specific reason to diverge.

  Let me paraphrase what mentions a dev to vmware, (it was in what concerns the amendment of vmfs default block size and I like to think that it is also applied to vmware Scheduler, a great great piece of programming). "We optimize, so you can just go with the default value and know he's going to do the right thing."

  The default size of the distribution is a good compromise, optimized to work under most workloads; different size block sizes can have radically different performance based on the workload characteristics.  The default value works well and 2008 and later versions of the most recent vm of windows properly aligned on 64 k.

  Dell has a ton of technical documents by comparing the performance of raid levels.  Already a few months that we are talking about performance raid comparng and I whimper.

  If it needs to be super fast I pick up 10, lots of space 5, more reliable but more space, and then from 10 to 6.

  Dell technology said that most of the people raid 5, because disk is so reliable.

  We use raid 6 for reliability on volumes in addition to 12. Depending on the level of incorrigible error on a raid of 12 to rebuild.

  http://m.ZDNet.com/blog/storage/why-RAID-6-stops-working-in-2019/805 (which implies an ure 12^{14 and I think I'm 12 years old company records}15 ure).

  The backup raid controller cache battery alleviates some of the supposed raid 6 over raid 5 performance drops.

  In your case I use raid 5 for warehouses of operational data for performance and raid 6 for the backup data store.

  In addition a synthetic benchmark not always told you the return you will get with a real application in an operating system.

  When we first virtualized mysql, according to our benchmark iometer, we thought performance would be an order of magnitude worse. In practice, they were good enough that we went hog wild and virtualized of many others.  You should always be aware of the performance characteristics of your application.

  For example, we have two pairs of distinct mysql replication, and each of them get their own volume 5 disc on the md1000 even.

  Heterogeneous workloads on the same volume of mixture, specifically servers oversees with lots of random file io and vm with support for example sequential access will hurt the performance of the database.  ESXI 4.1 storage io control feature is designed to mitigate this.

  The funniest on the axles and raid controllers, it's that sometimes a lot of slower batteries will out perform less higher speed axes.

  If you think you aggregate read the md1000 on performs faster small volume.

  Battery learn cycle is running all 90 days or more and turn off the cache writeback, which hurt performance. He must run because the cache battery degrades over time, and he needs to know when the battery lasts less than 24 hours.  It determines this by measuring the time it takes to recharge.

  We have never noticed this or necessary to adjust it to our server by default openmanage farm, I just thought I would mention it because we were on a subject very.

  Install openmanage for esxi.  Disable the cache on individual disks, as this cache is not battery backup.

  Don't forget to document your config, because it won't remember what you were doing when you do a recovery.

• Determine the best image to overlay size to use

  Hi people

  So I'm working with Premiere Pro CS6 make a video montage of a Minister of my friends. Over pieces of the video, I was just overlap citations and whatnot. I would like to achieve consistency in always making sure that they are included on the same location on the screen. So I thought that a simple way to do it would be to determine the pixel size of the sequence. And the report of properties folder that my sequence is 1440 x 1080. I thought I could just create and manipulate images of this exact size and drop them to the exact location.

  The problem is that when I create an image of this size and drop it in PP, right monitor shows the image with areas of pillarboxed video on each side of it. The image certainly seems to be on-site with the altitude, but the width is off and I don't know why?

  So what is the explanation here? Certainly it seems that properties of the sequence are at odds with what this area right monitor in PP.

  

  Thank you... Rick

  You can specify the PAIR of titles that you create:

  

  .

  Basically, HD anamorphic uses rectangular pixels

  in order to crush the 16: 9 image in a setting of 4 x 3.

  First use-squishes' back pixels in 16 x 9.

  If your film the layer source is 1440 x 1080 (1.333).

  you are right in a sequence of 1440 x 1080 (1.333)...

  you just need to create the corresponding aspect / securities.

  If you use another application to create your .png images

  I'd be inclined to 1920 x 1080 (1.0).

  This will suit your anamorphic sequence regardless of the BY.

• Best types of files, size etc. of import in InDesign, etc.

  Hello

  Given that my computer is to thrust then with files that are too big (old files that I created when I wasn't aware of the best ways to reduce the size of the file, etc..) I have a few questions.

  • A lot of my files is. EPS, but in this case, I have the original in file. PSD or. PDF (both possible to place in InDesign files). What is the best type of file to be placed in InDesign, because having the same design and in. PSD and in. EPS seems a little stupid to me?
  • What are the best options to place images and files in an InDesign file without creating a huge PDF file afterwards?
  • What are the best options to place files and images in a Photoshop file without making it huge?

  Who can advice me some sites or books that can tell me all about this topic? Since I started my own Graphic Design business, it is a very important subject to me because the file size optimization is something that I still have a lot of problems with!

  Thank you guys!

  to start:- http://indesignsecrets.com/tiff-vs-psd-vs-eps-vs-pdf-vs.php

• What is the best format and the size of a logo in a flash project?

  I have this flash project in which I animate a logo from big to small, the logo in the great State looks pretty good, but when flash reduced the logo image animation tend to Pixelize (I don't know if this term is correct).

  Thank you

  This is what happens when you change the size of an image.

  The best format for a logo is the vector.  Then, you can change its size, rotation, etc. without distortion or pixelation.

  If you can not go with a vector graphic, try to use several images of different sizes, and switch between them if necessary to recreate the interpolation, or, try a PNG and hope that pixelation is not too bad.

• Newbie needs help with leader and mixed size/font style in the paragraph

  I'm very new to using InDesign. I am formatting my book for children in a style similar to books, Geronimo Stilton:

  Geronimo Stilton #51: The Pearl of enormouse affect Heist: Anticipazioni - Geronimo Stilton [p. 2]

  Can someone direct me to how to keep my consistent attack despite a change in the size of police and style in a paragraph?

  Thank you!

  Susan

  to set up your line spacing in your paragraph style value (do not let auto leading value to your paragraph style).

  Also implemented a vertical justification above and do not align to baseline grid

  an example:

  

• Sizes of mixed memory in Dell R710 to reach speeds of 1333 mhz and 800 mhz

  We have some Dell R710 which was originally ordered with 48 GB in a configuration of 1333 mhz 12x4Go (RDIMMS). We ordered 6 sticks of memory of 4 GB 1333 mhz additional to complete all 18 banks for a total of 72 GB.  The speed of the memory, then decreased to running at 800 mhz.  We had immediately complaints on the performance in some of our mission critical VM (terminal Server and SQL DBs servers), so we have VMotion their due on a R710 still on the original 12x4Go config clocked at 1333 mhz and complaints went.  I spoke with pre-sales both Dell and after-sales technical support and they confirm that filling all 18 banks decreases speed to 800 mhz, but I get conflicting reports which must be running 12 banks (which is configured as 2 of the 3 banks available in each 6 channels) at 1 066 mhz now which is not. Still, both say that my best option is to return the modules to 4 GB bought recently and also pull the original 12x4Go modules and replace them all by 12x8Go 96GB and should operate at 1333 mhz.  It is really more memory I need and almost three times that I have already budgeted and spent on extra 4 GB of purchase sticks.

  The other option, you said I could do, as well as that of my question is to mix 6x4Go and 6X8Go, up to 72 GB.  I see also that is a configuration of memory available on the Dell Web site during the construction a R710, and he said 1333 mhz as well.  Technical support before and after had these things to say, and it makes me a little nervous because this isn't an absolute 'you'll be fine:

  prior support guy:

  "Everything I read or say confirms that it is perfectly fine to mix the modules in sizes too long as modules within each channel are the same size." I think it can be recommended by most to ensure the consistency of the size but as I said before that we have in our new server system configurations to be cited with mixed sizes what makes me even more confident that is you went this route you would be fine and little or no experience in performance decline. »

  support after guy:

  "Regarding your new question on the use of 6 DIMM 4 GB mixed with 8 GB for a total of 72 GB, which is not an optimum configuration, but I don't think you should really meet a lot of problems with it."  I mentioned before that if you mix speeds, it will downclock fastest at the speed of slow DIMM DIMMS, so certainly would advise against mixing speeds. Regarding the size, the only thing you might encounter as it is booting, you can hear this isn't an optimal configuration, but it should detect any memory and be able to make use of this.  Don't think there is really a performance reached unless you're missing speeds.  «Also, don't forget to reflect your configuration across all channels, if you do not want all of the 4 GB and 8 GB in the same configuration such that put all 8 GB in slots 1/2/3, then put the 4 GB DIMMs in 4/5/6 on both machines slot A and B.»

  So the real question is - if it is not a "optimal" configuration, which makes it means the actual performance of my vSphere servers?  All done and they have problems?

  Thank you

  Ben

  How about using 8x8GB sticks for each host? You'd get to 64 GB each... I'd like to see if Dell will allow you to trade in the memory, you do not have to purchase new memory inside the host... Or look for another provider of memory which will provide you with the correct memory at a better price.

  Network administrator

  VMware VCP4

  Review the allocation of points for "useful" or "right" answers.

• Beginner frame size question-new sequence is not what says PP

  I want to crop 30px from the bottom of a 576 x 352 movie. If only I could drag a marquee selection autour with a crop tool and save it would be perfect.

  All that I know to do is create a new sequence with the new frame size 576 x 322, then copy the old film in it. I have create a new sequence of Custom, and PP dialog box shows that it has the desired size (scrn bottom CAP), but it isn't... its actually much smaller and the most cultivated in all parts. When I copy in the 576 x 352 images in to the new sequence, the image size is not yet near. What I am doing wrong?

  PP CS6 mac

  

  

  The spacing in pixels between these two screens do not match... are the pixels of your film footage square pixels, or more narrow les.909? Make sure your settings to completely sequence corresponding to the size of the image file - and all other things except to change the dimension of height. So remember to slide images of this sequence, using 'set to the size of the image' and see if it works better.

  Neil

• 4 editing sequences of k in a sequence HD

  Hello

  I have a few PRORES 4 k images that I'd like to edit in HD (I like the ability to crop etc.)

  trying to find the best sequence settings to do that I am on windows and is not a pro res setting.

  If I create a sequence and import the clip, I wonder if I want to change the settings to match the clip that I chose. I have then go into the settings of sequence and change the resolution of 1920 x 1080. the issue I'm having is that the clips resized in the HD sequence do not play back smoothly while the 4 clips in a sequence of k 4 k!

  BTW, I am running windows 10. I7 5960 x o/c to 4 GHz with a GTX980

  Thank you!

  Hello

  There is no sequence ProRes, no do you need one. The fact is, you could look at sequence Presets of ARRI, AVCHD and DSLR all in 1080 p 30 and find the settings inside all 3 are identical! Would not matter of the 3 you use, if your source video is 1080 p 30 of any codec flavor.

  As you are using a 4 k source, what is the frame rate? If 30 p, then just choose a 1080 p 30 sequence, for example options AVCHD. 4 k to import clips in this project, and when you put the clips in the timeline, and it is said that they do not match, do not take into account-you do not want the 1080 p sequence is 4 k.

  When the clamps are timeline, right-click and choose set to the size of the image - which will make the 4 k clip fit into the framework of 1080 and you will pan and zoom without loss of quality (to a point, using available 4 k resolution of source). NOT chose not to scale to the size of the image, which works differently.

  I shot a concert of the choir in 4 k, leaving camera to wide angle to cover the whole Stadium for the duration (20 singers covered whole step). First, I edited in a sequence of 720 p, to give me a little more zoom-ability I would get with 1080 p. Was able to zoom in and get a close-up of waist in place of soloist! Of course by using keyframes allows for nice, zoom in and out, pan around the group, simulated camera movements etc.

  Thank you

  Jeff Pulera

  Safe Harbor computers

• Image - Image sequence or sequence Quicktime conversion

  Hi all

  IM on a Mac using the suite CS4 and my film is in the format. MP4 Long GOP of a Sony EX 1.

  
  I encountered some problems with trimming/consolidation of first projects and implementing Mocha due the Long GOP.
  Since I don't usually spend more money on ANOTHER product to learn ANOTHER application, I thought I could just convert and replace my clips via the queue or Media Encoder in a format that does not problems.

  
  Previous info I got from the forum was: "Animation and codecs PNG in a QuickTime container as Exchange lossless formats are good. The PNG codec is better for photorealistic images - as most of the video - while the Animation is better compression of large areas of the same color, like in a cartoon. (Where the name 'Animation'.)

  Apple uncompressed 10-bit - when the quality is greater and you have a lot of speed and disk space
  Apple ProRes HQ - quality almost without loss, but smaller size files. »

  
  To further confuse me, I read in book AE CS4 effects of Visual Mark Christiansen, a sequence is better than the Quicktime movie because of the ease of replacement of bad image and some other stuff on Quicktime gamma incompatible formats.  But then, in a sidebar, it said sequences would not play back so easily using non-linear editor. However, the sequences are the best choice for larger projects or more long form.  ... and something about 10 bit uncompressed is only Lossless to 8bpc.  I did not get around learning about 16 and 32 bpc and why or how I'd use apart from a tutorial video Copilot on creaing which flourishes beyond the 255 white.  Then someone mention Apple Pro Res because of 4 2 2 color space.

  HUH WHAT?

  
  Some of these concepts are currently a little over my head.  Basically, I just want to convert my images without losing quaility to something that will work in AE (with Mocha) and can change and consolidate in Premiere Pro.  What is the best to choose when I lose ALL the quality of the original sequence.  File size is not a problem that I have a lot of hard disk space and will be consolidated.

  Thank you

  What is the best to choose when I lose ALL the quality of the original sequence.

  Uncompressed. If not as strict on ANY Lagarith or HuffYuv are also good.

• iMac, can I mix maps memory 2 G and 4 G

  I've just updated to El Capitan on an iMac with 4 GB of memory. Now, I want to add memory, because it is really slow. There are 2 empty slots (0/Dimm0 and Bank 1/Dimm0 Bank) and 2G cards in the other 2. Can I get 4 2 cards to the homes empty, or is - this bad mix sizes? If I can mix, no matter who go in what locations?

  iMac 21.5 "-end 2009

  3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo

  Yes, you can use 4 x 2 to expand the memory.

  It's OK if you re-arrange-the as Chair of music, however, save time, simply insert these 4 x 2 in the existing empty slots, then

  you're ready to go.

  Sam

• Reduce the size of photo on laptop library

  Received error message - your startup disk is almost full.  Checked storage space - about 3G stay out of 120 G.  Majority of the space is used by the Photos, even if I have pictures of preferences to control the size based on the remaining storage space.  With the help of El Capitan 10.11.3

  OK, that setting is not so magical. It will do it's best to reduce the size of your local images, but there is a limit.

  You can, and it appears to have run out of disk space. An external USB drive is probably your best option. Move your pictures on it and free up space on your system drive.

  You heurterez you probably have other problems with so little disk space available.

• Win XP (Pro) - the correct virtual memory size

  Hello

  May I know what is the optimal size for the virtual memoray in MB when the Advance system setting?

  The default size of the system to the optimal size is?

  What happens when it is too beneath and above the optimum size?

  I need my PC to get the best visual effect and fast and accurate performance.

  Thank you

  Low

  No one can tell you that, without more information on your system.

  They can guess and suggest things like the committed Microsoft Support Engineer "experts":

  'Increase the value of the initial and maximum size to a higher value.

  Who has no sense at all, but it is advice from these committed Microsoft alleged Support Engineer "experts."

  Increase by 10, 100, 1000, a meelion?

  If your pagefile is out of whack, you might see something like that:

  Virtual memory minimum too low: your system is low on virtual memory.  Windows is increasing the size of your virtual memory paging file.

  This means that Windows XP is to let you know that he does his work.  The message is not an error message - this is an informational message.

  If XP thinks that the size of the swap file (usually c:\pagefile.sys) is too small to accommodate your day-to-day transactions, it will adjust the paging file to expand the pagefile and display this message as it does.  It is not necessarily a 'problem', but the message is boring.

  My notes:

  At least that learn you more about managing memory than Windows XP, it is usually best to simply let XP manage the size of your virtual memory paging file.

  To see what your current, make settings right click post work, properties, advanced, performance settings, Advanced tab, virtual memory, and then click the button change.

  Make a note of the current settings in case you need to change their return more later.

  The best setting for the size of swap file is usually going to be:

  System managed size

  Right click my computer, properties, Advanced tab, Performance... Settings, Advanced tab, virtual memory... Change.

  Note the current setting, so you can change things later if you have a problem.

  If it is already done, on the size of swap file:
  
  System managed size

  Don't forget to click on Set (to be defined), OK several times to save the settings and then restart your computer.

  Windows XP will attempt to affect a swap file approximately 1.5 times the total amount of RAM installed on your system.  To manage the size of paging file Windows XP is enough for most configurations.

  If your system is not set to the size of the managed system, you must determine how it changed and why (usually a bad reason), make a note of the current settings to change them back later if necessary, and then change the setting to the size of the managed system, click on the Set button and then click on apply to apply the changes (you will be asked to restart).

  "Because someone told me to" is not a good reason to start making adjustments to the size of pagefile.  Setting just above to enlarge it by an arbitrary value can ease the symptoms of the problem and stop message, but may not result in the best configuration for your system.

  All the advice to 'Increase the value of the initial and maximum size to a higher value' are misinformed ideas that come from not knowing how to work XP - How do you increase it and what happens if you increase too?

  If you want your system to operate as efficiently as possible, you must understand what is happening and fix it properly and not only begin to try things or make some arbitrary adjustments.

  The size of the pagefile can really need adjustment, but you should at least try to know what you're doing and why you need to do.  It is unlikely that anyone can tell you how to adjust your settings properly without more information.

  If you don't know what are the best settings, or if you are not sure what should be your settings and need help looking at your stuff, follow these steps:

  Click Start, run and enter in the box:

  Msinfo32

  Click OK, and when the system info summary appears, click on edit, select all (Ctrl-A), copy (Ctrl-C) and paste (Ctrl-V) the information back here in your next reply.

  There will be some personal information (such as the user name and the name of the system), and what appears to be personal information for you, simply delete the personal information of the pasted information.

  This minimize back Q & A and eliminate the guesswork and assumptions.

• Export size

  

  Hello! Here you can see a video I did, there is a version that I had myself by using a simple html5 code text file to display the video.

  If its clear enough that this is a large video. I did not knowingly define it like that. It's hard to see in this photo, but I've added a new blue matte background of the same color to fill the black sides, you can see about a feint of borders outline if you view it close enough. If seen on youtube there a margin of Letterbox (black top and bottom).

  When I open a new project, as much as I know, I do not specify what size the video is going to be, generally content that will begin to define who, right? This video is is a unique background (with mast) image, then the lyrics on top.

  When I export I use h.268 (think that it is good, maybe that - you know the one) setting and 720 p 1280 720 is my preference. I'm confused as to why the project is a large screen, I him did not like that I know. It would be great if I could just fill a screen, which is so much to ask.

  Please could you help me to set the size of my videos properly, thank you very much.

  What version of Premiere Pro are you using? And "latest" is irrelevant... we must dot-number of the help/a words of the dialog box. 2015.4 or something like that.

  As a general rule, when you start a project, you drop a clip on the empty space of chronology and PrPro will create a sequence with cadence-size/according to what is your media.

  And I'm not interested to see this in HTML5, but whether in PrPro or 'standard' player like VLC. Who will actually give me a strong sense of what the video... is.

  A little about the codecs... '720' is 1280 X 720, also known as HD or "high definition", which is a proportion of 16:9, the same as '1080', which is 1920 x 1080. The two, compared to the old 4:3 TV earlier broadcast standards and older movies, are the big screen.

  We need the actual numbers on your sequence to see what settings dialog box that your sequence is on the size of the image, and of course, the export dialog box allows you to export with the settings that you exported to.

  Neil

• sessions of the sequence

  Hello.. Please help me > > > > I have pictures and video clips

  in my project, but the black borders appear on video clips

  I want to match the project to the size of the video clips

  CV

  PrPro common practice is to leave the program to define the parameters of the sequence of the primary media that you use. So when you start a sequence, you take either a clip from the Source to an area monitor empty timeline, drag & drop a clip from the project to an area Panel empty timeline, or drag & drop a clip on the "new item" icon at the bottom of the project Panel, select "Sequence" that the new element.

  PrPro emits a sequence of the size of the frame and frame-rate of the media, with the number of audio tracks, and you're ready to go. Your sample at the top of the page is a picture of 4:3 proportion, down is a 16:9 image of proportion on a sequence of 4:3 proportion.

  It seems that your video is 16:9 and your still images are 4:3 or about. Make a new sequence, dropping the video on the timeline first. Then put stills on it with "set to framesize" as a default. It's the ' Edit /: preferences "dialog box.

  Neil