Bug in comparison

Similar Questions

• Bug in comparison to Date?

  Hi all
  
  Please note the 2 sets of code pasted below. They return both the same output of 1 January 87 ' but the ' < ' and ' > ' signs were exchanged in the control IF condition. No idea why this is happening? Is this a bug or am I missing something here?
  
  Thank you
  
  SID
  
  Code 1:
  ----------
  
  DECLARE
  
  THE DATE;
  
  BEGIN
  
  THE: = TO_DATE ('01-' |) 'JAN' | ' -'|| substr('1987',3,2), 'DD-mon-YYYY');
  
  IF months_between(LA,SYSDATE) > 0 THEN
  
  dbms_output.put_line (la);
  
  END IF;
  
  END;
  
  
  CODE 2:
  -----------
  DECLARE
  
  date of temp_start_date_date;
  
  I have SEVERAL;
  
  temp_month varchar2 (4);
  
  BEGIN
  
  i: = 1;
  
  temp_month: = "JAN";
  
  temp_start_date_date: = TO_DATE ('01-' | temp_month |) » -'|| substr('1987',3,2), 'DD-mon-YY');
  
  IF months_between(temp_start_date_date,SYSDATE) > 0 THEN
  
  dbms_output.put_line (temp_start_date_date);
  
  END IF;
  
  END;
  
  Published by: the_reckoner on October 15, 2009 05:56

  Hello

  I'm not sure of the question here. Ask yourself why the 1st query does not produce a value, but the second not?

  If so, it's because of your conversion to_date.

  In the 1st query convert you a date using DD-MON-YYYY indicating a date of 1 January 1987 "." Comparing sysdate using months_between which gives-23073, so less than 0.

  In the 2nd query convert you to a date using DD-MON-AA giving a date of January 1, 2087 '. Comparing sysdate using months_between which gives 926, so superior to 0.

  Concerning

  Paul

• Comparison to 0 in 2012 TS SP1

  About the 346934 bug (the comparison function can produce different results when the operands are exchanged if one operand is null) http://www.ni.com/white-paper/14361/en/ I would like to point out that TS 2012 SP1 gives a bad result in both cases.

  In other words, when I take a few and compare! = 0, it will create FALSE, regardless of whether (0! = SmallNumber) or (SmallNumber! = 0). This will prevent to use TS SP1 2012 because we need this comparison to work.

  Herewith a sequence it illustrates. Running with TS 2012, Test0First will be set to false, Test0Last will have the value true; run with TS 2012 SP1, both may be skewed.

  Concerning

  Peter

  This has been fixed in 2013 TestStand, would it be possible for you to upgrade to this version? In case you're curious or have need this info later, the id for the patch is 395762

  Hope this helps,

  -Doug

• Game run smoother on parallels and then when the Bootcamp?

  Hey all, new to Mac computers, well sort of, I've used before, but never actually possessed a.

  in any case, I have 128 GB of my SSHD partitioned for windows 10 on bootcamp. I'm also under Parallels 11. Why both? I want to be able to run games smoothly while than it started only on windows 10, but still be able to run not intensive, work related programs while that started on my Mac OS.

  So I played Spintires on bootcamp lately, it's great! I have to run in mode for some reason any to keep my mouse cursor, and I have to run on medium graphics settings (at the top, it's average slow and lazy). Not the end of the world good? I wasn't expecting to run games on high gfx.

  So I decided to try to play while Mac OS on parallels last night, it works perfectly on high graphics... just the controls are a little bugs in comparison only works on Windows.

  Type of should not the other way around?

  When you run a game in a window, then you lose various features such as back buffer blithering and tastes and generally it performs well worse then in full screen

  probably, that's your problem and maybe your problem is that you have not installed the correct drivers in bootcamp for the video card also runs some lowest common denominator rather than the radeon one generic driver

• Comparison of JavaScript bug

  So I found a weird Javascript bug and was hoping someone could help me.

  If say

  var value = 40;

  var smallervalue = 8;

  If (value<>

  doSomething;

  }

  It always seems to work for some reason any even if 40 is > 8. This bug seems javascript is compared only the first digit of the report number to the integer value of the number. I m also using a 'table' for the value for the 'small' in my actual code. Could someone help me debug this? Thank you very much!

  I'll take a hypothesis that you end up with a string comparison.   One of the sillier confusions of JS.   Anyway try

  If (+ value< +smallervalue).="">

• Type of comparison bug?

  Hello
  
  My Flex/AS3 application traverses an array and checks the contents. Very simple task so far. Now, if I assign for example
  myArray [6] = 0; The following statement returns the value true: if (myArray [6] == "") {...} Although the direct comparison would never be.
  Is this a known bug?
  
  Alex

  It is not a bug.
  You try to compare two values to Boolean return false. That is to say
  Boolean (0) = false and Boolean("") = false then false == false returns true.

  Try again with the sign of the strict equality: (3 equal signs)
  If (myArray [6] = "")

• [Bug]? Line and force the comparison Mode

  It seems that changing the Mode of comparison of the IR & C function with the tables or Clusters attached does not Type of spread, or anything that is responsible for the selection of the instance.  By example, if I combine three tables at the entrances of IR & C, change the comparison mode for comparing aggregates, and then create an indicator of the range in? output, the result is the wrong indicator and a cut wire.  Similarly, can I change the mode on a function IR & C with a wired in the range? output and it will not break the thread until a subsequent change triggers a recompilation or type of spread.

  LV10 (no SP1) and Win7.

  Hi Darin.K,

  I was able to reproduce the behvior you see in LabVIEW 2010 SP1. If the tables are entered and the comparison Mode is the change in the creation of 'Compare the aggregates' indicator will incorrectly create an array of Boolean flags wired to a single Boolean result.

  This was previously reported in a request for Corrective Action (RCA) and the behavior has been corrected in LabVIEW 2011. Thank you for taking the time to report the problem and apologize for any inconvenience it caused.

• Bug min &amp; Max?

  Hi all

  I noticed a strange behavior in the min & Max node in the snippet below. It is set to compare items. According to the size of array, as determined by 'Dimension' the resultant y table for the 'Signal' gives different results.

  It is supposed to read:

  NaN, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, NaN...

  But when I get a value for the 'Dimension' of 16 or more, it reads:

  NaN, NaN, NaN, NaN, NaN, 2, 2, 2...

  For small values of 'Dimension', the code snippet works as expected.

  With the help of probes, it seems that min (NaN; x) = x for tables with 15 elements and less and larger paintings is min (NaN; x) = NaN

  Certainly it is not provided for

  I guess I'm missing something obvious and I'm about to learn something.

  Or is it really a bug?

  With the help of LV 2011 SP1

  

  Concerning

  Florian

  A solution to your problem is to put a loop around the comparison.  It will give consistent results.

  What I find interesting, it's the result of more than 16 items of tables is the same that if you compare the aggregates.

  It also has appearss to be precise to NaN.  If you use a different value for your table, you don't see the value changes.

  I can also confirm the same behavior in LV2012.

• Incorrect comparison evaluation?

  Hello

  I had a bug in my VI and reduced to the following code. The values in the output array must be 10 for all values in the input array. However, for only 11-1E 1E-14, LabVIEW seem to rate less 1 incorrect statement, that translates into a power of 100. In the execution of climax, a T is given to is 1 less than 1, which is obviously false. If I replace the statement with a greater than or equal to 1 and change of control loop until stopped instead of loop, I get the same result for the range of 1-11 to 1-14. What Miss me? Is it just a bug in LabVIEW?

  Thank you

  Steve

  You run agains the inherent limitation of the comparison of floating-point numbers. There is nothing wrong.

  (See also)

• NaN bug: If A = NaN and B = NaN, then A == B right? Not according to LV

  I am trying to write code that finds NaN in a 1 d double table, but for some reason, the "equal to" and "not equal to" controls do not work correctly.  I'm using LabVIEW 2009, but this bug may be present in earlier versions.

  See the attached screenshot and code.

  When this gets fixed?  If not, how can I filter NaN of a 1 d array?  There is a constant "NaN" can I use instead of simply typing "NaN" in a constant of type double?

  This isn't a bug. Any comparison involving NaN gives a FAKE for a good reason.

  To check for NaN, use this primitive.

• Error of comparison while trying to round like Excel

  I have two different but related issues. First: my LabVIEW application is not passing validation of my client because the results in LabVIEW are not exactly the same as those that my customer buy when using MS Excel. The problem is with rounding: LabVIEW and Excel round numbers differently and (unfortunately) I have to round up the numbers in the way that Excel.

  Because I need to round up after the comma, I started using a beautiful VI I found here at ni.com called 'DecimalRoundingLV8.5vi'. However, due to the difference between LabVIEW and Excel, I can't use this VI as it is. For example, rounded to the third place after the comma:

  The number to round	LABVIEW	EXCEL
  0.0045	0.0040	0,0050

  So, my first question is this one, I need to round like Excel... However, the solution I implemented raised an odd question, and I don't know if I see a bug in LabVIEW.

  I changed the decimal rounded VI. Here is a picture of the code and I also enclose it:

  

  First of all, if the number is negative I change into a positive for rounding. In the end, I return the sign.

  Like the original VI, I multiply the number to round up times 10 ^ x, where x is the place after the decimal point, I would like to turn to, I'm rounding and then dividing by 10 ^ x.

  However, I also multiply the number of round 10 ^(x+1) time and divide the result by 10 to get the unit as the reminder and to evaluate this number. If the number is less than 5, I tour as usual; If not, round towards + infinity.

  So far, so good and everything seems to be fantastic. But when I tested this code I found the following bizarre scenario. For example, rounded to the third place after the comma:

  The number to round	LABVIEW	EXCEL
  0.0855	0.0860	0.0860
  0.0856	0.0860	0.0860
  0,0857	0.0860	0.0860
  0.0858	0.0860	0.0860
  0.0859	0.0860	0.0860
  0.0860	0.0860	0.0860
  0.0861	0.0860	0.0860
  0.0862	0.0860	0.0860
  0.0863	0.0860	0.0860
  0.0864	0.0860	0.0860
  0,0865	0.0860	0.0870
  0,0866	0.0870	0.0870
  0,0867	0.0870	0.0870
  0,0868	0.0870	0.0870
  0.0869	0.0870	0.0870
  0.0870	0.0870	0.0870
  0.0871	0.0870	0.0870
  0.0872	0.0870	0.0870
  0.0873	0.0870	0.0870
  0,0874	0.0870	0.0870
  0,0875	0.0880	0.0880

  Note When the flare 0,0865. LabVIEW is wrong! However, LabVIEW was not wrong for 0.0855 or 0,0875. When I ran the code using the highlight feature, it turns out that the problem was the comparison function. It is said literally than 5<5 is="">.

  I tested in LabVIEW 8.2 and LabVIEW 12. I use Windows XP SP3.

  These numbers are not the only cases with this weird behavior. Other numbers are 0.1425, 0.1725 0.1745 and more. I don't see a drawing (or a reason!)

  Can someone please test my code and report if you met the same behavior?

  Enrique,

  It is a fundamental issue with the help of the binary representation over for numbers.  Event that you post and think that numbers like decimal representations, the computer stores in a binary format.  As 0.0045 or 0.004 number can be represented in binary format used by LabVIEW.  Place a digital control on a new VI. Set the display format to show ~ 20 significant digits.  Type in 0.004 or 0.0045 hit and hit enter.

  0.0045-> 0.0044999999999999996600

  The correct rounding for this value is 0.004.  Of course typing 0.004 gives 0.004000000000000000080.

  I don't have Excel so I don't know what it does, but it will have the same problem with approximate representations of numbers.

  There are a lot of posts on the Forums about number representation.

  In addition, the reason that the exact equality comparisons on the non-entier data types should be avoided or used with caution.

  Lynn

• Comparison of references has failed

  Hello

  recently, I observed a strange behavior when you try to compare two references referring to the same controls typedefed.

  What I want to achieve:

  I created a control typedefed (a group of radio buttons with additional information) for use on the front end of the user interface. To manipulate the content, I created a Subvi, which takes a front control reference. The feature is not interest - he controls the values represented by radio buttons, so it is a sort of "advanced radio button control.

  Now, I need to address the data structure, the cluster components. The first approach was to compare the labels with a hard-coded string. But then I ignored this first attempt because if someone changes the labels of front-end control the Subvi is no longer visible reason. So I decided to compare the references.

  So far the story of presentation...

  Now, I have observed some kind of pathological behavior - and this is my question:

  Attached to this post is a little demonstration VI which should clearly state the question.
  First of all, I created an instance of the control. For simplicity let's call him "MyControl".
  Then, I created two references to this object.

  The first by selecting the Reference of the Server 'VI' in the 'Application' menu. Done, right click on the reference and choosing the menu option 'Link to .../Pane/MyControl' creates the link to the control. If I open the same menu entry, there is no point of control in the menu (this becomes important later).

  The second, that I did a right click on MyControl and selecting the menu item "Create/Reference". As for the first difference this reference shows check marks in the entrance 'Link to... ". " of the right click menu.

  Both references seem to be related correctly to control if used to read or write all properties. But if I try to compare using the "Equal?" 'Différent?' or the 'Comparison' palette, result is inequality. Unless we compare the cast type numbers or references by itself.

  I know that the value of references may differ in value, but the comparison functions that must manage in resolving references before equality checking. (refer to the documentation for the range of comparison)

  Why the references are uneven? Also, right-clicking on the control or its terminal and by selecting "Find all references" in the menu right click - only considers the first of these two references.

  Is this a problem of referencing the typedef and contains the structure the typedef? (only typedefed controls behave as described, after that disconnection of the typedef comparison works)

  One last thing, I found out: select 'Link to .../Pane/MyControl' in the menu on the right - click with the button of the second reference (the checked input) connects the reference correctly, even for the comparison functions and function "Find all references" . As a result, the checkmarks disappear.

  How can I ensure a good related references? Is there a better way - more stable - to refer to a control by a label or a reference?
  Is this a bug? I'm using LabView 2011 (without SP1) on a computer laptop win7.

  
  

• [BUG] [OS: 6.0.1] [Model: Z5/C] No keyboard by default when the default keyboard is uninstalled

  Hello

  I've been playing with the keyboard and other keyboards for compact and have encountered a small bug.

  Probably not this joint because I doubt anyone would have done what I'm doing, but it's quite possible to happen for other users and easily replicated.

  If the default keyboard is currently not the Xperia keyboard, and the keyboard is uninstalled through the app store application to play Google,

  any application that requires the entry of key numbers / does not display a current keyboard, and the user will not be able to move forward.

  The current solution is to reinstall another keyboard through the Google game shop, to be able to toggle the switches that allow you to change the keyboard by default to something other than what you want to uninstall.

  Address bar is selected with the cursor of type, but does not display a keyboard.

  

  When the "keyboard input methods &" display 'Current keyboard' and tap or attempt to select this option is ignored

  

  It's the screen that should appear if you select the current keyboard: the only way to get back to that made by the work around I mentioned above, Xperia keyboard is the current keyboard, but all keyboards were set to OFF. The uninstalled keyboard for the test was Swype.

  

  

  That's what should display the menu "language and seizure" when it is not working properly

  

  A keyboard is now enabled again.

  

  Here is that the address bar selected once again, with the Cursor Type... just to show that it was not a mistake, because you can hide the keyboard by pressing on the button previous... the last screencap is for comparison. Note the orange box is no longer around the address bar.

  

  Note: If other users want to disable other Xperia keyboards for other regions, it is safe to do so and has no adverse effects on the International keyboard function.
  (I've been running it without the Japanese and Chinese keyboards for about a month now)

  I noticed something new on the forums for solutions resolved to threads... etc.

  I can't mark my own post as solved. It's sort of resolved.

  EDIT: OHMYGOD. This second post active the solved button. Points!

• Multi day Passport BlackBerry calendar events: Bug or feature?

  I have a three day event.

  The month view shows the event only on the day of departure, that the other two days are not marked.

  In comparison my 10.2.1 device (Z10, Z30): all days are marked by the appointment. And also in the color of the calendar, on 10.3 all appointments are gray.

  It's supposed to be a new feature, or is it just a bug?

  Hi @simon_hain

  I was able to reproduce this problem, and it has connected with our development team. Updates, to bookmark this KB.

  KB36389 appointments that span several days are not properly presented in the monthly view

  Thank you!

• CC15 crashes at start of playback on comparison screen

  Hello

  I have a problem. I recently built a new PC monster only for mounting in first. Now, everything is very fast, with the exception of a very annoying bug. During the changes, especially if I trim videos, first temporarilly shows a side view beside the images in the window of the program. Whenever this happens, happens often, it impossible to reread and for minutes sometimes hangs on the main window of loading again.

  I know that my explanation is pretty terrible, so I made a screenshot. Its an old project, but it doesn't matter how "heavy" frames or effects are, the problem persists.

  

  I hope someone knows what could cause this, or how the comparison is officially called so I can expand my search

  For a few features:

  3 TB HARD drive for files of film and project

  SSD for scratch disk

  Program files/windows SSD

  I7 5930 k

  32 GB ddr4

  GTX 980

  Update of the first CC

  Thank you!

  After what I read on other forums, off ' Composite overview over the plate ", it is in the sequence of parameters (key on your timeline icon).  Maybe it's the question!