Bulk collect into a Table nested with Extend

Similar Questions

• Using bulk collect into with assistance from the limit to avoid the TEMP tablespace error run out?

  Hi all

  I want to know if using bulk collect into limit will help to avoid the TEMP tablespace error run out.

  We use Oracle 11 g R1.

  I am assigned to a task of creating journal facilitated for all tables in a query of the APEX.

  I create procedures to execute some sql statements to create a DEC (Create table select), and then fires on these tables.

  We have about three tables with more than 26 million records.

  It seems very well running until we reached a table with more than 15 million record, we got an error says that Miss tablespace TEMP.

  I googled on this topic and retrieve the tips:

  Use NO LOG

  Parallel use

  BULK COLLECT INTO limited

  However, the questions for those above usually short-term memory rather than running out of TEMPORARY tablespace.

  I'm just a junior developer and does not have dealed with table more than 10 million documents at a time like this before.

  The database support is outsourced. If we try to keep it as minimal contact with the DBA as possible. My Manager asked me to find a solution without asking the administrator to extend the TEMP tablespace.

  I wrote a few BULK COLLECT INTO to insert about 300,000 like once on the development environment. It seems.

  But the code works only against a 000 4000 table of records. I am trying to add more data into the Test table, but yet again, we lack the tablespace on DEV (this time, it's a step a TEMP data)

  I'll give it a go against the table of 26 million records on the Production of this weekend. I just want to know if it is worth trying.

  Thanks for reading this.

  Ann

  I really need check that you did not have the sizes of huge line (like several K by rank), they are not too bad at all, which is good!

  A good rule of thumb to maximize the amount of limit clause, is to see how much memory you can afford to consume in the PGA (to avoid the number of calls to the extraction and forall section and therefore the context switches) and adjust the limit to be as close to that amount as possible.

  Use the routines below to check at what threshold value would be better suited for your system because it depends on your memory allocation and CPU consumption.  Flexibility, based on your limits of PGA, as lines of length vary, but this method will get a good order of magnitude.

  CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE show_pga_memory (context_in IN VARCHAR2 DEFAULT NULL)

  IS

  l_memory NUMBER;

  BEGIN

  SELECT st. VALUE

  IN l_memory

  SYS.v_$ session se, SYS.v_$ sesstat st, SYS.v_$ statname nm

  WHERE se.audsid = USERENV ('SESSIONID')

  AND st.statistic # nm.statistic = #.

  AND themselves. SID = st. SID

  AND nm.NAME = 'pga session in memory. "

  Dbms_output.put_line (CASE

  WHEN context_in IS NULL

  THEN NULL

  ELSE context_in | ' - '

  END

  || 'Used in the session PGA memory ='

  || To_char (l_memory)

  );

  END show_pga_memory;

  DECLARE

  PROCEDURE fetch_all_rows (limit_in IN PLS_INTEGER)

  IS

  CURSOR source_cur

  IS

  SELECT *.

  FROM YOUR_TABLE;

  TYPE source_aat IS TABLE OF source_cur % ROWTYPE

  INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;

  l_source source_aat;

  l_start PLS_INTEGER;

  l_end PLS_INTEGER;

  BEGIN

  DBMS_SESSION.free_unused_user_memory;

  show_pga_memory (limit_in |) "- BEFORE"); "."

  l_start: = DBMS_UTILITY.get_cpu_time;

  OPEN source_cur.

  LOOP

  EXTRACTION source_cur

  LOOSE COLLECTION l_source LIMITED limit_in;

  WHEN l_source EXIT. COUNT = 0;

  END LOOP;

  CLOSE Source_cur;

  l_end: = DBMS_UTILITY.get_cpu_time;

  Dbms_output.put_line (' elapsed time CPU for limit of ')

  || limit_in

  || ' = '

  || To_char (l_end - l_start)

  );

  show_pga_memory (limit_in |) "- AFTER");

  END fetch_all_rows;

  BEGIN

  fetch_all_rows (20000);

  fetch_all_rows (40000);

  fetch_all_rows (60000);

  fetch_all_rows (80000);

  fetch_all_rows (100000);

  fetch_all_rows (150000);

  fetch_all_rows (250000);

  -etc.

  END;

• bulk collect into with limit

  Hi all
  I was reading [http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:5918938803188] of Tom Kyte site on bulk collect within limits. The code uses the % notfound cursor to exit the recovery loop. What I do in this situation is using exists, method of table rather than cursor attribute.

  create or replace procedure p1 is
  type num_list_type is table of number index by pls_integer;
  num_list num_list_type;
  
  cursor c1 is select temp from test;
  
  begin
  open c1;
  loop
    fetch c1 bulk collect into num_list limit 2;
    if num_list.exists(1)=false then
      exit;
    end if;
    for i in num_list.first..num_list.last 
    loop
      dbms_output.put_line(num_list(i));
    END LOOP;
  end loop;
  
  end;

  Since when I do this:

  exit wen c1%notfound  

  It will close when the cursor retrieves only less than the limit, leaving a few rows. If the code works properly.
  Question:
  1. is the Exit statement properly, is there another way (I'm a little skeptical because I'm not using the cursor)?
  2 How to decide on the size limit based on what we have in the hardware settings and oracle? All of the guidelines?
  3 - is the best practice when it comes with the cursor and several lines that still use bulk collect into?
  
  Best regards
  Val

  Valerie Debonair wrote:
  Hi all
  I was reading [http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:5918938803188] of Tom Kyte site on bulk collect within limits. The code uses the % notfound cursor to exit the recovery loop. What I do in this situation is using exists, method of table rather than cursor attribute.

  create or replace procedure p1 is
  type num_list_type is table of number index by pls_integer;
  num_list num_list_type;
  
  cursor c1 is select temp from test;
  
  begin
  open c1;
  loop
  fetch c1 bulk collect into num_list limit 2;
  if num_list.exists(1)=false then
  exit;
  end if;
  for i in num_list.first..num_list.last
  loop
  dbms_output.put_line(num_list(i));
  END LOOP;
  end loop;
  
  end;
  

  Since when I do this:

  exit wen c1%notfound  
  

  It will close when the cursor retrieves only less than the limit, leaving a few rows. If the code works properly.
  Question:
  1. is the Exit statement properly, is there another way (I'm a little skeptical because I'm not using the cursor)?
  2 How to decide on the size limit based on what we have in the hardware settings and oracle? All of the guidelines?
  3 - is the best practice when it comes with the cursor and several lines that still use bulk collect into?

  Best regards
  Val

  Hello

  1. Yes, in above code statement EXIT will work correctly. The other way is % NOTFOUND CURSOR attribute usage.
  2. There is no precise way to decide the size limit.
  3 depends on number of records. If you have a lot of records always use LIMIT that improves performance.

  After reading the link that was posted by Blu, I am to edit this post.

  1. do not use CURSOR attribute when you use collections within a cursor. Use methods of collection such as COUNT or EXIST etc.

  @Blu,

  Thanks much for the link.

  Thank you
  Suri

  Published by: Suri on January 26, 2012 20:38

• help join you a table nested with ordinary table

  IM creating a nested table object prtcnpt_info codelist. In a block anonymous im saying t_code as type nested table codelist.
  Now when I try to join the table nested to ordinary table oracle DB and I get the error: PL/SQL: ORA-00904: "COLUMN_VALUE": invalid identifier.
  Please help me on this and provide link tutorial about this concepts... Here is the code I wrote
  
  -Start code.
  create or replace type prtcnpt_info as an object (identification number
  , name varchar2 (200)
  (, code varchar2 (30));
  
  
  create type codelist is the prtcnpt_info table;
  
  
  declare
  t_code codelist.
  Start
  
  Select prtcnpt_info (b.pid, b.name, pt.code) in bulk collect into t_code
  party pt
  mc_code b
  where pt.cd in ("AAA", "BBB")
  and pt.ptype_id = b.pt_type_id;
  
  
  INSERT INTO table (ID
  RUN_ID
  DATA
  P_ID
  )
  SELECT id
  run_id
  data
  prtct.id-> 1
  IN table_2 t2
  , (by selecting column_value in table (t_code)) prtct
  WHERE prtct.id = t2. P_ID; -> 2
  
  end;
  
  -End code;
  also of the anonymous block
  1 = > is this right until you get the id value (b.pid) of the tablet_code nested as prtct alias?
  2 = > is this right until you reach the nested with ordinary table table? I want to join the id column in the tables.
  
  Published by: 914912 on April 30, 2012 02:11

  Write the insert like this and try

  insert into table
  (
         id
       , run_id
       , data
       , p_id
  )
   select id,
       run_id,
       data,
       prtct.id
     from table_2 t2
       table(t_code) prtct
    where prtct.id = t2.p_id;
  

• bulk collect into the collection of objects

  create or replace type typ_obj as an object
  (l_x number (10),)
  l_y varchar2 (10),
  LZ varchar2 (10)
  );
  
  Create the type typ_obj_tt is table of the typ_obj;
  
  / / DESC insert_table;
  c_x number (10)
  C_P number (10)
  
  temp2_table / / DESC
  doJir number (10)
  c_y varchar2 (10)
  c_z varchar2 (10)
  
  procedure prc_x (p_obj_out ON typ_obj_tt)
  is
  cursor c1
  is
  Select t1.c_x,
  T2.c_y,
  T2.c_z
  Of
  insert_table t1,
  temp2_table t2
  where
  ....
  ;
  Start
  Open c1;
  collect the fetch c1 into loose in p_obj_out;
  Close c1;
  
  end;
  
  raises the error
  
  can you tell
  How to enter data in this object of type of output table
  
  Thanks in advance... any help will be much appreciated...

  PL do not spam the forums with topics in double - bulk collect into the collection of objects

• Using the slider for and BULK COLLECT INTO

  Hi all
  in this case we prefer to use the cursor AND the cursor with the LOOSE COLLECTION? The following contains two block this same query where used FOR the slider, the other is using COLLECT LOOSE. The task that is running better given in the existing? How do we measure performance between these two?
  
  I use the example of HR schema:

  declare
  l_start number;
  BEGIN
  l_start:= DBMS_UTILITY.get_time;
  dbms_lock.sleep(1);
  FOR employee IN (SELECT e.last_name, j.job_title FROM employees e,jobs j 
  where e.job_id=j.job_id and  e.job_id LIKE '%CLERK%' AND e.manager_id > 120 ORDER BY e.last_name)
  LOOP
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE ('Name = ' || employee.last_name || ', Job = ' || employee.job_title);
  END LOOP;
  DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('total time: ' || to_char(DBMS_UTILITY.get_time - l_start) || ' hsecs');
  END;
  /
   
  declare
  l_start number;
  type rec_type is table of varchar2(20);
  name_rec rec_type;
  job_rec rec_type;
  begin
  l_start:= DBMS_UTILITY.get_time;
  dbms_lock.sleep(1);
  SELECT e.last_name, j.job_title bulk collect into name_rec,job_rec FROM employees e,jobs j 
  where e.job_id=j.job_id and  e.job_id LIKE '%CLERK%' AND e.manager_id > 120 ORDER BY e.last_name;
  for j in name_rec.first..name_rec.last loop
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE ('Name = ' || name_rec(j) || ', Job = ' || job_rec(j));
  END LOOP;
  DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('total time: ' || to_char(DBMS_UTILITY.get_time - l_start) || ' hsecs');
  end;
  /

  In this code, I put a timestamp in each block, but they are useless, since they both launched virtually instantaneous...
  
  Best regards
  Val

  (1) bulk fired fresh primary use is to reduce the change of context between sql and pl sql engine.
  (2), you should always use LIMIT when it comes with bulk collect, this does not increase the load on the PGA.
  (3) and the ideal number of BOUNDARY lines is 100.

  Also if you really want to compare performance improvements between the two different approaches to sql pl try to use the package of runstats tom Kyte

  http://asktom.Oracle.com/pls/Apex/asktom.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701

• Bulk collect into the record type

  Sorry for the stupid question - I do something really simple wrong here, but can not understand. I want to choose a few rows from a table in a cursor, then in bulk it collect in a folder. I'll possibly extended the record to include additional fields that I will select return of functions, but I can't get this simple test case to run...
  
  PLS-00497 is the main error.
  
  Thanks in advance.

  create table test (
  id number primary key,
  val varchar2(20),
  something_else varchar2(20));
  
  insert into test (id, val,something_else) values (1,'test1','else');
  insert into test (id, val,something_else) values (2,'test2','else');
  insert into test (id, val,something_else) values (3,'test3','else');
  insert into test (id, val,something_else) values (4,'test4','else');
  
  commit;
  
  SQL> declare
    2   cursor test_cur is
    3   (select id, val
    4   from test);
    5
    6   type test_rt is record (
    7     id   test.id%type,
    8     val      test.val%type);
    9
   10   test_rec test_rt;
   11
   12  begin
   13    open test_cur;
   14    loop
   15      fetch test_cur bulk collect into test_rec limit 10;
   16       null;
   17     exit when test_rec.count = 0;
   18    end loop;
   19    close test_cur;
   20  end;
   21  /
      fetch test_cur bulk collect into test_rec limit 10;
                                       *
  ERROR at line 15:
  ORA-06550: line 15, column 38:
  PLS-00497: cannot mix between single row and multi-row (BULK) in INTO list
  ORA-06550: line 17, column 21:
  PLS-00302: component 'COUNT' must be declared
  ORA-06550: line 17, column 2:
  PL/SQL: Statement ignored

  You must declare an array based on your registration type.

  DECLARE
     CURSOR test_cur
     IS
           SELECT
              id,
              val
           FROM
              test
     ;
  type test_rt
  IS
     record
     (
        id test.id%type,
        val test.val%type);
     type test_rec_arr is table of test_rt index by pls_integer;
     test_rec test_rec_arr;
  BEGIN
     OPEN test_cur;
     LOOP
        FETCH
           test_cur bulk collect
        INTO
           test_rec limit 10;
        NULL;
        EXIT
     WHEN test_rec.count = 0;
     END LOOP;
     CLOSE test_cur;
  END;
   31  /
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:00.06
  ME_XE?
  

  Notice that the difference is...

     type test_rec_arr is table of test_rt index by pls_integer;
     test_rec test_rec_arr;
  

• bulk collect into after insertion?

  The INSET below works great!
  

      insert into GL_Interface_Control_temp
                                     (Set_Of_Books_ID
                                     ,Group_ID
                                     ,JE_Source_Name
                                     ,Interface_Run_ID)
                             values  (
                                      '2'
                                      ,10
                                      ,'TEST_SOURCE'
                                      ,'2'
                                      )
    returning ty_GLI (Set_Of_Books_ID
                     ,Group_ID
                     ,JE_Source_Name
                     ,Interface_Run_ID
                     ,0
                     ,0
                     ,null)
    bulk collect into l_GLI_Tab;

  BUT when combined with an INSERT... SELECT, as follows:
  

    insert into GL_Interface_Control_temp
                                     (Set_Of_Books_ID
                                     ,Group_ID
                                     ,JE_Source_Name
                                     ,Interface_Run_ID)
                            (select   gi.Set_Of_Books_ID
                                     ,GL_Interface_Control_S.nextval
                                     ,gi.JE_Source_Name
                                     ,GL_Journal_Import_S.nextval
                              from    GL_Interface_temp gi
                              where   gi.Currency_Conversion_Date <= l_Max_Rate_Date
                              and     gi.Set_Of_Books_ID  = v_Set_Of_Books_ID)
    returning ty_GLI (Set_Of_Books_ID
                     ,Group_ID
                     ,JE_Source_Name
                     ,Interface_Run_ID
                     ,0
                     ,0
                     ,null)
    bulk collect into l_GLI_Tab;

  I get the following error:

    *
  ERROR at line 15:
  ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended

  No idea why?
  Can we not use BULK COLLECT BACK IN with an INSERT SELECT?
  
  P;

  I'm sorry to tell you that the return clause can only be used with the values clause.

  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e10592/statements_9014.htm#i2121671

  Alessandro Bye

• Select Insert and bulk collect into exadata

  Hi all

  We work in Oracle Exadata. I am new to oracle exacta.  We need to insert some 7.5 million records in our table. My manager who has worked at exadata asked me to insert, select to load the data of 7.5 million records from one table to another. He asked me to forget fired fresh concepts in bulk. I read exadata prefer basic set rank of basic techniques. Is in bulk collect not a technical set base? Select Insert or in bulk which is a better technique, gather to load records from one table to the other in oracle exadata? Please advise me on this issue

  Mantra of Tom apply for Exadata and, in its follow-up here:

  Ask Tom & quot; DML only insert & #x2F; Select or bulk collect... & quot;

• In BULK COLLECT IN the Table "Record".

  Hello

  I can't find a solution for this case. I try to extract the data in an array of different records with subtype records.

  -Table example:

  CREATE THE TABLE1 TABLE:

  ("COLUMN1" NUMBER,

  "COLUMN2" NUMBER,

  "COLUMN3" NUMBER,

  "COLUMN4" NUMBER,

  COLUMN '5' NUMBER,

  "COLUMN6" NUMBER

  );

  -Sample data:

  INSERT INTO TABLE1 (COLUMN1, COLUMN2, COLUMN3, COLUMN4, COLUMN 5, COLUMN6) VALUES ('11', '12', '13', '14', 15', 16');

  INSERT INTO TABLE1 (COLUMN1, COLUMN2, COLUMN3, COLUMN4, COLUMN 5, COLUMN6) VALUES ('21', '22', '23', '24', 25', 26');

  INSERT INTO TABLE1 (COLUMN1, COLUMN2, COLUMN3, COLUMN4, COLUMN 5, COLUMN6) VALUES ('31', '32', '33', '34', 35', 36');

  INSERT INTO TABLE1 (COLUMN1, COLUMN2, COLUMN3, COLUMN4, COLUMN 5, COLUMN6) VALUES ('41', '42', '43', '44,' 45', 46');

  INSERT INTO TABLE1 (COLUMN1, COLUMN2, COLUMN3, COLUMN4, COLUMN 5, COLUMN6) VALUES ('51', '52', '53', '54,' 55' 56');

  Here, I stated some of the columns of the table as individual records / use in the RETURN of some of the features clause.

  DECLARE

  TYPE t_col_group1 IS RECORD (col2 of TABLE1. COLUMN2% TYPE

  col3 TABLE1. COLUMN3% TYPE

  );

  TYPE t_col_group2 IS RECORD (col4 TABLE1. COLUMN2% TYPE

  col5 TABLE1. COLUMN3% TYPE

  );

  TYPE t_coll_collection IS RECORD (col1 TABLE1. % TYPE COLUMN1

  col_group1 t_col_group1

  col_group2 t_col_group2

  col6 TABLE1. % TYPE COLUMN1

  );

  TYPE t_table IS the TABLE OF t_coll_collection INDEX DIRECTORY.

  v_table t_table;

  CURSOR c_table IS

  SELECT COLUMN1, COLUMN2, COLUMN3, COLUMN4, COLUMN 5, COLUMN6

  FROM TABLE1;

  BEGIN

  OPEN c_table.

  Get the c_table COLLECT in BULK IN v_table;

  CLOSE C_table;

  END;

  I can ' manage to get the data in the table with the COLLECTION in BULK:

  Fehlerbericht:

  ORA-06550: Line 25, column 35:

  PLS-00597: expression "V_TABLE" in the list IS of the wrong type

  ORA-06550: Line 25, column 3:

  PL/SQL: SQL statement ignored

  06550 00000 - "line %s, column % s:\n%s".

  * Cause: Usually a PL/SQL compilation error.

  * Action:

  Thank you!

  André

  My environment:

  Oracle Database 11 g Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit Production
  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
  CORE Production 11.2.0.3.0
  AMT for Linux: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

  You must define the SQL type

  create or replace type t_col_group1 as an object (col2, col3 number number)
  /
  create or replace type t_col_group2 as an object (col4 number, number col5)
  /
  create or replace type t_coll_collection as an object
  (
  number of col1
  col_group1 t_col_group1
  col_group2 t_col_group2
  number col6
  )
  /
  create or replace type t_table as the t_coll_collection table
  /

  declare
  v_table t_table;

  cursor c_table
  is
  Select t_coll_collection
  (
  Column1
  t_col_group1 (column2, column3)
  t_col_group2 (column4, column5)
  column6
  )
  FROM table1;
  Start
  Open c_table;
  collect the fetch c_table in bulk in v_table;
  close c_table;
  end;
  /

• Bulk collect into the statement

  Hi all

  I'm trying to copy data using the database link.

  I'm using the Oracle 11 g on Windows.

  I check the data in the source table and it exists. When I run under block it is running successfully but do return no data in the target database.

  SET SERVEROUTPUT ON

  DECLARE

  TYPE of t_bulk_collect_test_1 IS the TABLE OF NT_PROP % ROWTYPE;

  l_tab1 t_bulk_collect_test_1;

  CURSOR c_data1 IS

  SELECT *.

  OF NT_PROP@dp_copy;

  BEGIN

  OPEN c_data1.

  LOOP

  EXTRACTION c_data1

  LOOSE COLLECTION l_tab1 LIMIT 10000;

  commit;

  WHEN OUTPUT l_tab1.count = 0;

  END LOOP;

  CLOSE C_data1;

  END;

  /

  Could you get it someone please let me know what is the error in this code.

  Thanks in advance

  Bulk operation will not improve performance. Your code is a good example to show how to write code that is a performance nightmare. I'm sorry to say this, but it's the truth.

  Static SQL is the fastest way to do it. As you will transfer the data via a DB connection it will be certain overhead. But the block is not the solution for it. Make a simple INSERT INTO... SELECT... Beh It's the best way to do what you want.

• How to use in bulk collect into clause

  Hi all
  I need like this, I want to change the query by transmitting the names of the tables in oracle database 10 g 2.
  
  as if I use first of all, I spend select it by name of table scott.emp * from scott.emp;
  
  so I want to spend scott.dept table name select * from scott.dept;
  using select * option in the select list.
  
  How can I run it.
  
  Give me a solution.
  
  Please answer...

  Execute Immediate is in fact an option, that you can not use it because you have a variable select list.

  You can use DBMS_SQL or REF CURSOR. The Ref Cursor example is given below:

  var oput_cur refcursor
  var tabname varchar2(30)
  
  exec :tab_name := 'dual';
  
  begin
    open :oput_cur for 'select * from ' || :tabname;
  end;
  /
  
  print oput_cur
  

• Record table Nested sorting

  Hello

  Can you help me to sort (based on join date) below table nested using the TABLE function?

  declare
  type is rendered
  (emp_id char (20),
  date of join_d);
  type emp_tbl_type is table of SheikYerbouti;

  non_sorted emp_tbl_type;
  asc_sorted emp_tbl_type;
  Start
  -create sample data

  non_sorted (1) .emp_id: = '1';
  non_sorted (1) .join_d: = sysdate + 5;
  non_sorted (2) .emp_id: = '2';
  non_sorted (2) .join_d: = sysdate + 1;
  non_sorted (3) .emp_id: = '3';
  non_sorted (3) .join_d: = sysdate + 7;
  non_sorted (4) .emp_id: = '4';
  non_sorted (4) .join_d: = sysdate + 7;

  for me in non_sorted.first... loop of non_sorted. Last

  dbms_output.put_line ('Emp ID :'|| non_sorted (i) .emp_id |) ' Date :'|| non_sorted (i) .join_d);
  end loop;

  Select emp_id, join_d
  LOOSE COLLECTION asc_sorted
  table (cast (non_sorted AS emp_tbl_type))
  order of join_d;
  -can you sort these data and move it to asc_sorted

  because me in 1... loop asc_sorted. Count

  dbms_output.put_line ('Emp ID :'|| asc_sorted (i) .emp_id |) ' Date :'|| asc_sorted (i) .join_d);
  end loop;

  
  end;

  Thank you!

  Thanks I fixed the issue after reading the oracle documentation.

  declare

  non_sorted emp_tbl_type: = emp_tbl_type();
  asc_sorted emp_tbl_type: = emp_tbl_type();

  / * cursor asc_cur is
  Select emp_id, join_d
  table (CAST (non_sorted AS emp_tbl_type))
  order of join_d; */

  Start
  -create sample data
  non_sorted.extend;
  non_sorted (1): = emp_rec('1',sysdate+5);
  non_sorted.extend;
  non_sorted (2): = emp_rec('2',sysdate+1);
  non_sorted.extend;
  non_sorted (3): = emp_rec('3',sysdate+7);
  non_sorted.extend;
  non_sorted (4): = emp_rec('4',sysdate+3);

  for me in non_sorted.first... loop of non_sorted. Last

  dbms_output.put_line ('Emp ID :'|| non_sorted (i) .emp_id |) ' Date :'|| non_sorted (i) .join_d);
  end loop;

  dbms_output.put_line ('* UNSORTED data ');

  Select emp_rec (emp_id, join_d)
  bulk collect into asc_sorted
  table (CAST (non_sorted AS emp_tbl_type))
  order of join_d;

  dbms_output.put_line ('* UNSORTED data ');
  because me in 1... loop asc_sorted. Count

  dbms_output.put_line ('Emp ID :'|| asc_sorted (i) .emp_id |) ' Date :'|| asc_sorted (i) .join_d);
  end loop;

  end;

  THX

• Problem with BULK collect and variable of Table type

  Hi all
  I defined a record type and then set an index - by table of this record type and in bulk has collected the data as shown in the code below. All this was done in an anonymous block.
  
  Then when I tried to set the record as an object type and not the above activities type, I got the below error:
  
  ORA-06550: line 34, column 6:
  PL/SQL: ORA-00947: not enough values
  ORA-06550: line 31, column 4:
  PL/SQL: SQL statement ignored
  
  Could you help me get the result of the first scenario with record type defined as an object?

  /* Formatted on 2009/08/03 17:01 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
  DECLARE
     TYPE obj_attrib IS TABLE OF num_char_object_1
        INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
  
     obj_var   obj_attrib;
  
     TYPE num_char_record IS RECORD (
        char_attrib   VARCHAR2 (100),
        num_attrib    NUMBER
     );
  
     TYPE rec_attrib IS TABLE OF num_char_record
        INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
  
     rec_var   rec_attrib;
  BEGIN
     SELECT first_name,
            employee_id
     BULK COLLECT INTO rec_var
       FROM employees
      WHERE ROWNUM <= 10;
  
     FOR iloop IN rec_var.FIRST .. rec_var.LAST
     LOOP
        DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (
           'Loop.' || iloop || rec_var (iloop).char_attrib || '###'
           || rec_var (iloop).num_attrib
        );
     END LOOP;
  
     SELECT first_name,
            employee_id
     BULK COLLECT INTO obj_var
       FROM employees
      WHERE ROWNUM <= 10;
  END;

  Here's the code for num_char_object_1
  

  CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE NUM_CHAR_OBJECt_1 IS OBJECT (
     char_attrib   VARCHAR2 (100),
     num_attrib    NUMBER
  );

  Welcome to the forum!

  You should be collecting objects in bulk, something like

  SELECT NUM_CHAR_OBJECt_1  (first_name,
            employee_id)
     BULK COLLECT INTO obj_var
       FROM emp
      WHERE ROWNUM <= 10;
  

• PLS-00201: identifier 'i' must be declared when using BULK COLLECT with FORALL to insert data in 2 tables?

  iHi.

  Declare
     cursor c_1
     is
      select col1,col2,col3,col4
      from table1
  
  
     type t_type is table of c_1%rowtype index by binary_integer;
     v_data t_type;
  BEGIN
     OPEN c_1;
     LOOP
        FETCH c_1 BULK COLLECT INTO v_data LIMIT 200;
        EXIT WHEN v_data.COUNT = 0;
        FORALL i IN v_data.FIRST .. v_data.LAST
           INSERT INTO xxc_table
             (col1,
              col3,
              col4
             )
              SELECT v_data (i).col1,
                     v_data (i).col3,
                     v_data (i).col4
                FROM DUAL
               WHERE NOT EXISTS
                            (SELECT 1
                               FROM xxc_table a
                              WHERE col1=col1
                                    .....
                            );
                       --commit;
           INSERT INTO xxc_table1
             (col1,
             col2,
            col3,
            col4
             )
              SELECT v_data (i).col1,
                     v_data (i).col2,
                     v_data (i).col3,
                     'Y'
                FROM DUAL
               WHERE NOT EXISTS
                            (SELECT 1
                               FROM xxc_table1 a
                              WHERE col1=col1
        .....
       );
  
  
         --exit when c_1%notfound;
     END LOOP;
     CLOSE c_1;
     commit;
  END;
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  I get 40/28-PLS-00201: identifier 'I' must be declared what the problem in the above code please help me and I have lakhs of data

  Thank you

  Post edited by: Rajesh123 I changed IDX

  Post edited by: Rajesh123 changed t_type c_1 in Fetch

  But by using a SET of INSERT to insert into two tables at once in the same query would do the job without any collection of bulk of PL and avoid to query two times too.

  for example, as a single INSERT...

  SQL > create table table1 as
  2. Select 1 as col1, col2 of 1, 1 as col3, 1 as col4 Union double all the
  3 select 2,2,2,2 of all the double union
  4 Select 3,3,3,3 Union double all the
  5 Select 4,4,4,4 of all the double union
  6 select 5,5,5,5 of all the double union
  7 select 6,6,6,6 of all the double union
  8 select 7,7,7,7 of all the double union
  9 select 8,8,8,8 of all the double union
  10. Select 9,9,9,9 to the Union double all the
  11. Select double 10,10,10,10
  12.

  Table created.

  SQL > create table xxc_table like
  2. Select 1 as col1, col3 2, 3 as col4 Union double all the
  3. Select the 3, 4, 5 Union double all the
  4. Select the 5, 6, 7 double
  5.

  Table created.

  SQL > create table xxc_table1 like
  2. Select 3 as col1, col2, col3, 5 4 "n" as col4 Union double all the
  3. Select the 6, 7, 8, double "n"
  4.

  Table created.

  SQL > insert all
  2 when the xt_insert is null then
  3 in xxc_table (col1, col3, col4)
  4 values (col1, col3, col4)
  5 when the xt1_insert is null then
  6 in xxc_table1 (col1, col2, col3, col4)
  7 values (col1, col2, col3, 'Y')
  8. Select t1.col1 t1.col2, t1.col3, t1.col4
  9, xt.col1 as xt_insert
  10, xt1.col1 as xt1_insert
  11 from table1 t1
  12 left join external xxc_table xt (t1.col1 = xt.col1)
  13 left xt1 xxc_table1 outer join (t1.col1 = xt1.col1)
  14.

  15 rows created.

  SQL > select * from xxc_table by 1.
  COL1 COL3 COL4
  ---------- ---------- ----------
  1          2          3
  2          2          2
  3          4          5
  4          4          4
  5          6          7
  6          6          6
  7          7          7
  8          8          8
  9          9          9
  10-10-10

  10 selected lines.

  SQL > select * from xxc_table1 by 1.

  COL1 COL2 COL3 C
  ---------- ---------- ---------- -
  1          1          1 Y
  2          2          2 Y
  3          4          5 N
  4          4          4 Y
  5          5          5 Y
  6          7          8 N
  7          7          7 Y
  8          8          8 Y
  9          9          9 Y
  10-10-10

  10 selected lines.

  SQL >