Business rule, author of the rule

Similar Questions

• Cannot connect to the Business Rules

  Hello. I can't see that the rules of the EAS Console company.
  I mean when I click on rules job... the error is "error connecting to business rules. The repository has not been configured, or you are not authorized to use business rules. ».
  
  
  Detailed error:
  «Detail: Error authenticating user in UserServerManager.»
  
  Details: Error authenticating user in UserServerManager.
  
  Details: Error authenticating user in UserServerManager.
  
  Details: Exception occurred. Please check your log file for more details. »
  
  It happens when I outsourced users... .. .before I can see business rules...
  
  Help would be appreceated.
  
  
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  Sri-Oracle

  Hello

  This means that the account that you log in to PARTY is not configured for access of business rule.

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• Impossible to get in to the company business rules

  Hi all! :) I have connected to the Essbase server, but when I click on the folder of business to the company rules, I get the message: + "error connecting to business rules. The repository has not been configured, or you are not authorized to use business rules '+. I also clicked on "Get details" in the error message box and it says: "error creating object DBConfig +.» Please check if there are exceptions in the log file and if HBR is configured correctly". + I checked my permissions of Shared Services and I don't know that I'm set up to use business rules; In addition, a few days ago, I worked with rules of business without problems and now I have this problem and I can't guess what he risks and how to fix it. I would be very grateful for any advice!

  Hello

  Try restarting services RMI and AAS.

  Kind regards

  Amol

• Prevent the business rule to run simultaneously

  Hi all

  We are on Hyperion Planning 11.1.1.3.500. One of our business rules makes the system completely meaningless with its results when some users are running at the same time. A person must have been necessary a HBR not to run when it is already running. I need your suggestions to avoid the business rule to run simultaneously.

  Thank you

  Hello

  • tell users check the console to work first, before you run the rule.

  or

  • have a member of the system in your dimension that you can use as a flag. You set it to 1 as the beginning of the rule to indicate he runs, 0 / #Missing at the end of the rule to indicate is finished. You then add a @RETURN to leave the calculation if this flag is set to 1 in your rule. Just be careful about this because if for any reason the calculation fails, or is killed by an admin then your flag is set to 1, but you can still have a form of admin to reset these flags easily if necessary.

  See you soon

  JM

• How to outsource reference data to the business rule processor?

  Details of the environment

  ======================

  Disqualification Version: 12.1.3.0.0

  By default, the reference (rules, controls and conditions) data used by the business rule processor comes to an excel file or stored in the repository database of the Disqualification.

  Is it possible to use a reference to the data that is stored in a different database (out of the repository database Disqualification) in the processor rule business?

  I tried the externalize option in the processor business rule, but on the identity tab, it is not allow me map the rule to the input attribute.

  

  

  Hello

  You can manage the rules from the outside, but you need to instantly and use research on stereotypes, because the rules of Business Check needs access to the rules at design time.

  -Mike

• The behavior of business rule when you deploy a new version

  Hi Experts,

  My client is using bpm11g, they asked when you deploy a new version of bpmn process with build-in the business rule, what will happen to the existing and update of the composer?

  The old rule will be updated with the new version or will be preserved as it was? If the latter is true, when the new version will be effective?

  Best regards

  Hello

  What has to happen, is it time that you changed a BR in the composer, that a redeployment of the composite does not replace the amended administrative rules.

  You can / should export your composite of EM then you JDeveloper project reflecting changes in the BR in composer: using Oracle SOA composer with Oracle Business Rules - 11 g Release 1 (11.1.1.6.1).

  Kind regards
  Martian

• Ranging from the form of a business rule is incorrect.

  Say we have 2 forms of planning F1 and F2 with 2 B1, B2 business rules. B1 is set to F1 and B2 is set at F2.

  We open form F1 and open B1, and then open the form F2 and run B2, we observe that instead of B2 B1 is running.

  This strange phenomenon occurs in all forms with their related business rules.

  Note: Is not a specific user or a specific browser.

  Someone has seen this before. Hyperion Version: 11.1.2.2

  Enjoy the anyhelp.

  Reading of Re: question in business rules with shapes (11.1.2.2.300) attahed

  See you soon

  John

• Members on the lines, can they be passed to running guest in a business rule?

  Can I ask you how can members on the lines past their value at the prompt of the execution in a business rule? I checked a post above saying that this can be done but it was 2010 any chance that there is a way now to do?

  Thank you in advance,

  Members on the lines, can they be passed to running guest in a business rule?

  You can do this if you use a Menu to launch rules in planning, any POV associated with the clicked cell is passed in the SPTR

  in the screen shot here you can see, I accessed the menu of the cell in red, I had selected a cell in the grid, period and year also would have been settled.

  

• Delete the business rule on the list of planning application business rules

  Hi all
  

  
  

  It is Hyperion planning 11.1.2.3 500, Classic application.

  
  The business removed from the calculation Manager rule is not available in the calculation Manager but still available in the list of planning application business rules.

  Any suggestion is appreciated to get it removed the application too.

  Note: EPMA, to deploy the application, but not safe for the classic.

  Kind regards

  Deker P.

  Are you sure you have deployed all the rules again Calc Manager planning then the rule is removed from the planning to remove from the Manager of Calc won't be enough.

  Support documents

  How to remove Calc of Hyperion Planning and Smart View rules after their removal in the calculation Manager? (Doc ID 1983285.1)

  How to remove redundant deployed rules of calculation Manager a Hyperion Planning application (Doc ID 1568355.1)

  How to completely remove the business rules created in the calculation Manager (Doc ID 825853.1)

  How to remove business rules that have been deleted or renamed in the calculation of Planning Manager. (Doc ID 1598010.1)

  See you soon

  John

• Business rule attached to the Composite web form does not

  Hello

  I created a composite Web form and set a business rule. Rule is supposed to work when recording. But his failure to do so. Version that is also tried 11.1.2.3.i BR fixation on individual forms as well as the composite online form. It still does not.

  Please give your valuable advice on that.

  Thanks in advance.

  You select run "Rules of form XX" in the section of composite shape business rule and select run on save option? Can you please provide a screenshot of your section of BR in Composite and simple form?

• The way a var as argument works do not (business rule)

  I tried to create a business rule that is able to say the amount of weeks between two dates, the post Re: behavior of days between two dates here has been very useful, but not everything works as expected.

  In the functions @JgetStringFromDouble (d2,@_false,@_false), if I write @JgetStringFromDouble (22,@_false,@_false)and use the static numbers for all the arguments, the business rule works without any problem. But if I try to run it with a var it validates correctly, but when the business rule execution it displays an error "error detected while trying to perform the work: DateDifference.

  In environmental assessments in the application log, I get the following messages:

  Failed to provision form/Conversion of date with the Code [37]

  Formula runtime error for [* BLOCK MEMBER of the post *]: status code in function [@TODATAEEX] [1200664]

  Transaction [0 x 130009 (0x5450fcfe.0x30958)] abandoned due to the State [1200664].

  Is there a workaround, or is there something I'm not? The only thing that prevents the code Re: behavior of days between two dates here to work, is that it won't work with a variable. Is there another way to pass the value of the variable to the function?

  Someone at - it an idea?

  Thank you!

  If you the GestionnaireCalc patch for more late then you will get 20 date functions and one is @CalcMgrWeeksBetween

  Concerning

  Celvin Kattookaran

• Problem with the business rule

  Hello

  I am trying to launch a business rule and the error is with a statement block, and bewlos is the erro

  Formula for [BegBalance] runtime error (line 93): attempt to cross a member function [@X] null

  I have amtrying to run os set States below

  ("BegBalance"
  "Jan" = "Jan"-> @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE (@Name (@Currmbr (Account)), 'ARPM')) * "Jan"-> "Ending members."
  "Feb"="February"-> @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE (@Name (@Currmbr (Account)), 'ARPM')) * "Feb"-> "Ending members."
  "Mar"="March"-> @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE (@Name (@Currmbr (Account)), 'ARPM')) * "Mar"-> "Ending members."
  "Apr"="April"-> @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE (@Name (@Currmbr (Account)), 'ARPM')) * "Apr"-> "Ending members."
  "May '=' may '-> @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE (@Name (@Currmbr (Account)), 'ARPM')) *"can "->" ending members. "
  "Jun"=' June'-> @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE (@Name (@Currmbr (Account)), 'ARPM')) * "Jun"-> "Ending members."
  "Jul"="July"-> @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE (@Name (@Currmbr (Account)), 'ARPM')) * "Jul"-> "Ending members."
  "Aug"="August"-> @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE (@Name (@Currmbr (Account)), 'ARPM')) * "Aug"-> "Ending members."
  "MS ' =' Sep'-> @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE (@Name (@Currmbr (Account)), 'ARPM')) * 'Sep'-> 'Ending members."
  "Oct"="October"-> @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE (@Name (@Currmbr (Account)), 'ARPM')) * "Oct"-> "Ending members."
  "Nov"="November"-> @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE (@Name (@Currmbr (Account)), 'ARPM')) * "Nov"-> "Ending members."
  "Dec" ="Dec"-> @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE (@Name (@Currmbr (Account)), 'ARPM')) * 'Dec'-> 'Ending members. "
  );

  M HERE just try to multiply here.can someone pls suggest.

  Hello

  This seems to be a mistake because of the name of Member formulated with the concatenation of the current Member of the dimension account with "ARPM.

  Check if the membername formulated in the formula corresponds with the name of the Member present in the outline.

  I hope this helps...

  Kind regards

  Amit Khanna

• Access a composite property in the business rule

  I have two properties of composites made in my composite.xml:

  < name = "bpel.preference.itsecurity property" type = "xs: String" much = 'false' "

  Override = "may" > it.security < / property >

  < name = "bpel.preferences.extsharepoint property" type = "xs: String" "

  much = 'false' override = "may" > external.sharepoint.app < / property >

  Is it possible to access this property in the business rule?  I would like to pass the value in some situations.  Or is there a way to move on to the business rule?

  Thank you

  Tom Henriksen

  Hi Tom,

  Yes the itSecurityIn variable must appear as an entry in the dialog box change the decision function.

  Thank you

• Error of the Hyperion select business rule planning task list

  Hi all

  I created an application of planning (11.1.2.3) with two planning types. I have lists of tasks for each of them.

  The problem occurs when I assign to a task, a business rule and this business rule belongs to the second type of plan, the selection list appears empty and when I go back and select the type of plan fist again, empty the list of continuous selection.

  Is there a bug in the planning (I guess)? Is there no work around for this problem?

  Thanks in advance.

  Kind regards

  John

  Hello

  To-do lists are not specific to the Type of Plan.

  You assign objects to tasks, and they can be from anywhere in the same application.

  When you say the selection list what are you referring?  A command prompt that you have in your rule? Or when you try to assign your rule to the task?

  I've implemented on 11.1.2.3 without any problem.

  Have you done that you have deployed your calc rule manager?

  Thanks Anthony

• Business rule running for the single member of the entity Dimension

  Hi all

  I'm developing an application of classical planning using Hyperoin 11.1.2.2

  I came across a scenario where a specific business rule is executed when the data are recorded on a specific data form. (IE run save the data form item)

  Currently, this rule executes all Member of the entity Dimension.

  Is it possible that this rule is run only for one member of the entity (that is currently selected in the Section Page of this form of data)

  Please note: I don't want to use run the guests of time i.e. I don't want my user to explicitly specify which Member of the entity in the RPT. In our its obvious business logic this business rule is only required to run for the member selected in the entity Dimension

  You must create a Variable of RTP of the type member, when you associate this rule save this form of data, select the option use members on forms of data and hide guests in this way you don't get the window prompt and BR will perform for a specific entity.

  See you soon... !!

  Rahul S.