Cannot create indexes on the flow table

Hello

I'm new to ODI.

The problem is that during the execution of an interface, I get the error of the "IKM Oracle Dimension to slow variation"

The command in step "Create unique index on the flow table:

creating index < % = odiRef.getTable ("L", "INT_NAME", "A") % > idx

on < % = odiRef.getTable ("L", "INT_NAME", "A") % > (< % = odiRef.getColList ("", "[column]", ",", "", "SCD_NK") % >)

< % = odiRef.getUserExit ("FLOW_TABLE_OPTIONS") % >

generate the following statement which lacks the name of the column between the (_)

Create index I$ _MYTABLE_idx

I have $_MYTABLE)

NOLOGGING

The result is that the interface fails with the error 936: 42000: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00936: lack of expression caused by the previous command wrong.

Please, can you help me?

Thank you very much

Angelo

Hello

I'm really really sorry! I just realized that you are working on the SCD. Basically, you are looking for all the column mapped as SCD_NK (key to slowly change natural Dimensions) insofar as shown here

Substitution QAnywhere

IF you need to read this

SCD Type 2 - ODIExperts.com

Let me know.

Tags: Business Intelligence

Similar Questions

ORA-02327: cannot create indexes on the LOB data type expression
DB 10.2.0.4
DB 5.2

I am not able to move lobindex and lobsegment. While try occurs below error

SQL > ALTER INDEX dev. "" SYS_IL0000718396C00002$ $"REBUILD THE TABLESPACE DATA_TEMP;
ALTER INDEX dev. "" SYS_IL0000718396C00002$ $"REBUILD TABLESPACE DATA_TEMP
*
ERROR on line 1:
ORA-02327: cannot create indexes on the LOB data type expression

Thank you

Published by: user13382934 on October 16, 2012 14:05
correct syntax is
ALTER TABLE.
MOVE the LOB ()
STORE AS (tablespace );

Where is a name of the / columns LOB, not the name of the segment. Moving type LOB data will move its indexes as well.

How to create indexes on the nested table.
Hi all
I held the syntax to create indexes on the nested table.

I found below synta but when I try it with my table it gives me error

CREATE UNIQUE INDEX indx_name
ON nestedtablestore (NESTED_TABLE_ID, id);

What is here NESTED_TABLE_ID & ID
They are virtual your nested table

Here is an example.
```
create or replace type obj as object (no integer, address varchar2(100))
/
create or replace type tbl as table of obj
/
create table test_tbl (id integer, name varchar2(100), address tbl) nested table address store as address_nt
/
create unique index address_no_idx on address_nt (no, address)
/
```
Published by: Karthick_Arp on November 23, 2010 01:41

How to create indexes for the great table of telecom
Hello

I'm working on DB 10 G on a 5 REHL for telecommunications company with more than 1 million saved per day, we need speed up the result of the query.
We know, there are several types of INDEX and I need professional advice to create a suitable,

many of our requests depend on the MSID (the MAC address of the Modem) column,
```
   
Name           Null Type         
-------------- ---- ------------ 
STREAMNUMBER        NUMBER(9)    
MSID                VARCHAR2(20) 
USERNAME            VARCHAR2(20) 
DOMAIN              VARCHAR2(20) 
USERIP              VARCHAR2(16) 
CORRELATION_ID      VARCHAR2(64) 
ACCOUNTREASON       NUMBER(3)    
STARTTIME           VARCHAR2(14) 
PRIORTIME           VARCHAR2(14) 
CURTIME             VARCHAR2(14) 
SESSIONTIME         NUMBER(9)    
SESSIONVOLUME       NUMBER(9)    
.
.
.
```
Please help,
Hello

first of all, think of all these SQL for the subquery on MAX (fairy) with analytical functions, the examples given on AskTom of rewriting: http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:9843506698920

So I'll start with a normal index the MSID (but I think you already have), but provide a compression on the column, I think the same value MSID exist several times in the table. If the performance is not satisfactory or that the plan is not the best, then an option to include more columns can help you.

I think that the first part of the answer will bring more gain.

Herald tiomela
http://htendam.WordPress.com

How to create indexes on the ordered collection of XMLTYPE table?

I use Oracle 11.2.0.2.

Basically, my XML documents have a 3-level hierarchy:

event

+ - action [1: n]

+ - param [1: n]

I try to create indexes on the tables of the orderly collection, but cannot get the right syntax...

I created a table with an XMLType object-relational column:

CREATE TABLE T_C_RMP_MNTRNG_XML_FULL_IL4 (
  MESSAGE_ID NUMBER(22,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
  XML_EVAL_ID NUMBER(22,0),
  VIN7 VARCHAR2(7 BYTE),
  FLEET_ID VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
  CSC_SW_VERSION VARCHAR2(100 BYTE),
  RECEIVED DATE,
  XML_CONTENT SYS.XMLTYPE ,
  DWH_LM_TS_UTC DATE NOT NULL ENABLE,
  CONSTRAINT PK_C_RMP_MNTRNG_XML_FULL_IL4 PRIMARY KEY (MESSAGE_ID)
) NOLOGGING TABLESPACE CATALOG
VARRAY "XML_CONTENT"."XMLDATA"."action" STORE AS TABLE "T_OR_MON_ACTION" (
  NOLOGGING TABLESPACE "CATALOG"
  VARRAY "param" STORE AS TABLE "T_OR_MON_ACTION_PARAM" (
  NOLOGGING TABLESPACE "CATALOG"
  ) RETURN AS LOCATOR
) RETURN AS LOCATOR
XMLTYPE XML_CONTENT STORE AS OBJECT RELATIONAL XMLSCHEMA "http://mydomain.com/cs.xsd" ELEMENT "monitoring";

I execute the SELECT statement:

SELECT EVENT_ID, ACTION_SUB_ID, MESSAGE_ID, ACTION_TYPE, UNIXTS_TO_DATE(ACTION_TIMESTAMP) ACTION_TIMESTAMP
FROM T_C_RMP_MNTRNG_XML_FULL_IL4, 
XMLTABLE( 
  'for $i1 in /monitoring , 
  $i2 in $i1/action            
  return element r {              
  $i1/eventId,              
  $i2            
  }' 
  PASSING XML_CONTENT COLUMNS 
  EVENT_ID VARCHAR(40) PATH 'eventId', 
  ACTION_SUB_ID INTEGER PATH 'action/actionSubId', 
  ACTION_TYPE VARCHAR2(100) PATH 'action/type', 
  ACTION_TIMESTAMP NUMBER(13,0) PATH 'action/time' 
) T2 
WHERE ( 
  EVENT_ID IS NOT NULL AND ACTION_SUB_ID IS NOT NULL 
)

The plan of the explain command looks like this (sorry, don't know how to get it formatted any 'eye-team'):

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| ID | Operation | Name                        | Lines | Bytes | TempSpc | Cost (% CPU). Time |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |                             | 1609K | 6316M |       | 6110K (1) | 20:22:11 |

|* 1 | HASH JOIN |                             | 1609K | 6316M |   111 M | 6110K (1) | 20:22:11 |

|   2.   TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_C_RMP_MNTRNG_XML_FULL_IL4 |   582K |   104 M |       | 5241 (1) | 00:01:03 |

|* 3 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_OR_MON_ACTION |    32 M |   117G |       |   105K (2) | 00:21:08 |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

---------------------------------------------------

1 - access ("NESTED_TABLE_ID"= "T_C_RMP_MNTRNG_XML_FULL_IL4"." ("SYS_NC0001300014$")

filter (CAST (SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL (SYS_XQEXVAL (SYS_XQEXTRACT ((SYS_XMLGEN ("T_C_RMP_MNTRN XMLCONCAT

G_XML_FULL_IL4 ". "" $ SYS_NC00017 ", NULL, SYS_XMLCONV ("T_C_RMP_MNTRNG_XML_FULL_IL4". "SYS_NC00012$", 0.32,

(('EC1EEF23FD023A27E04032A06D930A8D', 3, 3783, 1)), SYS_MAKEXML ('EC1EEF23FD023A27E04032A06D930A8D', 3780,

'T_C_RMP_MNTRNG_XML_FULL_IL4 '. "' SYS_NC00008$ ', 'SYS_ALIAS_0 '. ((("' SYS_NC_ROWINFO$ ')),'/ ID ', NULL), 0,.

0,20971520,0), 50.1, 2) AS VARCHAR (40)) IS NOT NULL)

3 filter (CAST (TO_NUMBER (TO_CHAR ("SYS_ALIAS_0". "actionSubId")) AS INTEGER) IS NOT NULL) "

Note

-----

-dynamic sample used for this survey (level = 2)

-Construction detected no optimized XML (activate XMLOptimizationCheck for more information)

The XML schema looks like this:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified" xmlns:oraxdb="http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb" oraxdb:storeVarrayAsTable="true" oraxdb:flags="2105639" oraxdb:schemaURL="http://mydomain.com/cs.xsd" oraxdb:schemaOwner="MYUSER" oraxdb:numProps="23">
  <xs:element name="monitoring" oraxdb:propNumber="3785" oraxdb:global="true" oraxdb:SQLName="monitoring" oraxdb:SQLType="monitoring755_T" oraxdb:SQLSchema="MYUSER" oraxdb:memType="258" oraxdb:defaultTable="monitoring757_TAB" oraxdb:defaultTableSchema="MYUSER">
    <xs:complexType oraxdb:SQLType="monitoring755_T" oraxdb:SQLSchema="MYUSER">
      <xs:sequence>
        <xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" ref="action" oraxdb:propNumber="3780" oraxdb:global="false" oraxdb:SQLName="action" oraxdb:SQLType="action752_T" oraxdb:SQLSchema="MYUSER" oraxdb:memType="258" oraxdb:MemInline="false" oraxdb:SQLInline="true" oraxdb:JavaInline="false" oraxdb:SQLCollType="action756_COLL" oraxdb:SQLCollSchema="MYUSER"/>
        <xs:element ref="reservationType" oraxdb:propNumber="3781" oraxdb:global="false" oraxdb:SQLName="reservationType" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:MemInline="false" oraxdb:SQLInline="true" oraxdb:JavaInline="false"/>
        <xs:element ref="softwareVersion" oraxdb:propNumber="3782" oraxdb:global="false" oraxdb:SQLName="softwareVersion" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:MemInline="false" oraxdb:SQLInline="true" oraxdb:JavaInline="false"/>
        <xs:element ref="eventId" oraxdb:propNumber="3783" oraxdb:global="false" oraxdb:SQLName="eventId" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:MemInline="false" oraxdb:SQLInline="true" oraxdb:JavaInline="false"/>
        <xs:element ref="vin" oraxdb:propNumber="3784" oraxdb:global="false" oraxdb:SQLName="vin" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:MemInline="false" oraxdb:SQLInline="true" oraxdb:JavaInline="false"/>
      </xs:sequence>
    </xs:complexType>
  </xs:element>
  <xs:element name="action" oraxdb:propNumber="3790" oraxdb:global="true" oraxdb:SQLName="action" oraxdb:SQLType="action752_T" oraxdb:SQLSchema="MYUSER" oraxdb:memType="258" oraxdb:defaultTable="action754_TAB" oraxdb:defaultTableSchema="MYUSER">
    <xs:complexType oraxdb:SQLType="action752_T" oraxdb:SQLSchema="MYUSER">
      <xs:sequence>
        <xs:element ref="type" oraxdb:propNumber="3786" oraxdb:global="false" oraxdb:SQLName="type" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:MemInline="false" oraxdb:SQLInline="true" oraxdb:JavaInline="false"/>
        <xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" ref="param" oraxdb:propNumber="3787" oraxdb:global="false" oraxdb:SQLName="param" oraxdb:SQLType="param749_T" oraxdb:SQLSchema="MYUSER" oraxdb:memType="258" oraxdb:MemInline="false" oraxdb:SQLInline="true" oraxdb:JavaInline="false" oraxdb:SQLCollType="param753_COLL" oraxdb:SQLCollSchema="MYUSER"/>
        <xs:element ref="actionSubId" oraxdb:propNumber="3788" oraxdb:global="false" oraxdb:SQLName="actionSubId" oraxdb:SQLType="NUMBER" oraxdb:memType="2" oraxdb:MemInline="false" oraxdb:SQLInline="true" oraxdb:JavaInline="false"/>
        <xs:element ref="time" oraxdb:propNumber="3789" oraxdb:global="false" oraxdb:SQLName="time" oraxdb:SQLType="NUMBER" oraxdb:memType="2" oraxdb:MemInline="false" oraxdb:SQLInline="true" oraxdb:JavaInline="false"/>
      </xs:sequence>
    </xs:complexType>
  </xs:element>
  <xs:element name="type" type="xs:string" oraxdb:propNumber="3791" oraxdb:global="true" oraxdb:SQLName="type" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:defaultTable="type751_TAB" oraxdb:defaultTableSchema="MYUSER"/>
  <xs:element name="param" oraxdb:propNumber="3794" oraxdb:global="true" oraxdb:SQLName="param" oraxdb:SQLType="param749_T" oraxdb:SQLSchema="MYUSER" oraxdb:memType="258" oraxdb:defaultTable="param750_TAB" oraxdb:defaultTableSchema="MYUSER">
    <xs:complexType oraxdb:SQLType="param749_T" oraxdb:SQLSchema="MYUSER">
      <xs:sequence>
        <xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="value" oraxdb:propNumber="3792" oraxdb:global="false" oraxdb:SQLName="value" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:MemInline="false" oraxdb:SQLInline="true" oraxdb:JavaInline="false"/>
        <xs:element ref="key" oraxdb:propNumber="3793" oraxdb:global="false" oraxdb:SQLName="key" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:MemInline="false" oraxdb:SQLInline="true" oraxdb:JavaInline="false"/>
      </xs:sequence>
    </xs:complexType>
  </xs:element>
  <xs:element name="value" type="xs:string" oraxdb:propNumber="3795" oraxdb:global="true" oraxdb:SQLName="value" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:defaultTable="value748_TAB" oraxdb:defaultTableSchema="MYUSER"/>
  <xs:element name="key" type="xs:string" oraxdb:propNumber="3796" oraxdb:global="true" oraxdb:SQLName="key" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:defaultTable="key747_TAB" oraxdb:defaultTableSchema="MYUSER"/>
  <xs:element name="actionSubId" type="xs:integer" oraxdb:propNumber="3797" oraxdb:global="true" oraxdb:SQLName="actionSubId" oraxdb:SQLType="NUMBER" oraxdb:memType="2" oraxdb:defaultTable="actionSubId746_TAB" oraxdb:defaultTableSchema="MYUSER"/>
  <xs:element name="time" type="xs:integer" oraxdb:propNumber="3798" oraxdb:global="true" oraxdb:SQLName="time" oraxdb:SQLType="NUMBER" oraxdb:memType="2" oraxdb:defaultTable="time745_TAB" oraxdb:defaultTableSchema="MYUSER"/>
  <xs:element name="reservationType" type="xs:string" oraxdb:propNumber="3799" oraxdb:global="true" oraxdb:SQLName="reservationType" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:defaultTable="reservationType744_TAB" oraxdb:defaultTableSchema="MYUSER"/>
  <xs:element name="softwareVersion" type="xs:string" oraxdb:propNumber="3800" oraxdb:global="true" oraxdb:SQLName="softwareVersion" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:defaultTable="softwareVersion743_TAB" oraxdb:defaultTableSchema="MYUSER"/>
  <xs:element name="eventId" type="xs:string" oraxdb:propNumber="3801" oraxdb:global="true" oraxdb:SQLName="eventId" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:defaultTable="eventId742_TAB" oraxdb:defaultTableSchema="MYUSER"/>
  <xs:element name="vin" type="xs:string" oraxdb:propNumber="3802" oraxdb:global="true" oraxdb:SQLName="vin" oraxdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2" oraxdb:memType="1" oraxdb:defaultTable="vin741_TAB" oraxdb:defaultTableSchema="MYUSER"/>
</xs:schema>

How can I create an index on these tables of the ordered collection to improve performance?

I found the example at http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/AppDev.112/e23094/xdb_rewrite.htm#ADXDB5859 but am not able to apply to this particular case...

Thank you in advance...

If the schema is not annotated and XS: Integer and XS: String are mapped to types of data NUMBER and VARCHAR2 (4000), so you must use in your query to avoid typecasting unnecessary operations.

You must also use XMLTABLEs chained when accessing a parent/child instead of a FLWOR expression relationship, otherwise the CBO cannot rewrite the XQuery query correctly (maybe it's fixed in the latest version).

If you make these changes, the plan should show the cleaner predicates:

SQL > SELECT EVENT_ID, MESSAGE_ID, ACTION_TYPE, ACTION_SUB_ID, ACTION_TIMESTAMP

2 FROM test_table

3 XMLTABLE ('/ monitoring ')

4 COLUMNS XML_CONTENT OF PASSAGE

5 WAY of VARCHAR2 (4000) EVENT_ID "ID."

6 actions for XMLTYPE PATH 'action '.

(7) T1,

8 XMLTABLE ('/ action')

Shares of PASSAGE 9 COLUMNS

NUMBER of ACTION_SUB_ID 10 PATH "actionSubId."

11 PATH of VARCHAR2 (4000) ACTION_TYPE "type."

12 WAY of NUMBER ACTION_TIMESTAMP 'time '.

(13) T2

14 WHERE EVENT_ID IS NOT NULL

15 AND ACTION_SUB_ID IS NOT NULL

16;

Execution plan

----------------------------------------------------------

Hash value of plan: 1763884463

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |                 |   109.   220K |     6 (17). 00:00:01 |

|   1. THE MERGE JOIN.                 |   109.   220K |     6 (17). 00:00:01 |

|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | TEST_TABLE |    11.   352.     2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

|   3.    INDEX SCAN FULL | SYS_C007567 |    11.       |     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

|* 4 |   JOIN TYPE.                 |   109.   216K |     4 (25) | 00:00:01 |

|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_OR_MON_ACTION | 106 S 216K | 3 (0) | 00:00:01 |

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

---------------------------------------------------

2 - filter("TEST_TABLE".") (' SYS_NC00012$ ' IS NOT NULL)

4 - access("SYS_ALIAS_0".") NESTED_TABLE_ID "=" TABLE_TEST. " ("' SYS_NC0000800009$ ')

filter ("SYS_ALIAS_0". "NESTED_TABLE_ID"="TABLE_TEST" "." " ("SYS_NC0000800009$")

5 - filter("SYS_ALIAS_0"." actionSubId» IS NOT NULL)

Note

-----

-dynamic sample used for this survey (level = 2)

Now, if it is still necessary, everything boils down to choosing a technique for index NULL values:

-composite index with a column not zero or constant

-FBI

-bitmap image

Choose the one that best fits your data, the selectivity and activity on the tables.

Creating indexes for the table

can someone help me how to create indexes in the table. I m creating own table... I need to select a particular field in the table. So I need to calculate the index position. I use my code like this,

This will returnthe number of columns in the table.

Class array

{

private int Table_Index()
{
for (int x = 0; x)<>
{
table_index = x;
}
Return table_index;
}

}

MainClass can I get this length of Index

Table T1;

int t1 is T1. Table_Index();

This property returns my length (4) of table column

Using this index (t1) I HAV to see what position I'm at table now...

someone help me...

You can use a listfield, he supports methods to get the selected row and its contents.

Why I can't create indexes on the table of RDF data

When I tried to create indexes on the table of RDF data, it always say the table or view does not exist. I created the RDF model using java codes:
Oracle Oracle = new Oracle ("jdbc:oracle:thin:@localhost:1521:orcl", "system", "123");
Chart GraphOracleSem = new GraphOracleSem (oracle, "test2");

And used the following commands in sqlplus to create indexes:
SQL >
SELECT THE SEPARATE OWNER, OBJECT_NAME
FROM DBA_OBJECTS
WHERE TYPE_OBJET = 'TABLE '.
4. AND OBJECT_NAME like ' % TEST2;
OWNER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OBJECT_NAME
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SYSTEM
TEST2_NS
SYSTEM
RDFB_TEST2
SYSTEM
TEST2_TPL
OWNER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OBJECT_NAME
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SYSTEM
RDFC_TEST2

SQL > connect as sysdba
Enter the password:
Connected.
SQL >
SQL >
SQL > select * from TEST2_TPL;
Select * from TEST2_TPL
*
ERROR on line 1:
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
SQL > CREATE INDEX test2_sub_idx ON TEST2_TPL (triple. GET_SUBJECT());
CREATE INDEX test2_sub_idx ON TEST2_TPL (triple. GET_SUBJECT())
*
ERROR on line 1:
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist

Hi Shifu,

It is not recommended to use the SYS or SYSTEM to store/manage schema graph RDF data.

Can you please try the following in a SQL * more terminal?

SQL > conn system/eu1

Connected.

SQL >

SQL >

SQL > create user graphuser identified by graphuser;

Created by the user.

SQL > grant connect, resources, unlimited tablespace to graphuser;

Grant succeeded.

SQL > conn graphuser/graphuser

Connected.

SQL > create table graph_tpl (triple sdo_rdf_triple_s) compress;

Table created.

SQL > sem_apis.create_sem_model exec ('graphic', 'graph_tpl', 'three');

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL > insert into graph_tpl values (sdo_rdf_triple_s ('graph', '', '', ''));

1 line of creation.

SQL > select count (1) in the mdsys.rdfm_graph;

1

You see the same result?

Thank you

Zhe Wu

ORA-04089: cannot create triggers on the objects belonged to SYS

I did a google on this error and it say that I should never get to anything to do with the system and also to make another account when executing my script, I did this, but I still get the error code and the error is less than
REM **********************************************************************
CREATE TABLE gam_attribute_bin (/ * gam_ab * /)
attribute_owner_type char (1) NOT NULL, / * player Att, Att User Instance Att Att class.
Class criteria, client static/Gulp * /.
ATTRIBUTE_NAME VARCHAR2 (20) NOT NULL,
owner_id NUMBER (10) NOT NULL, / * specific check-in attribute_owner * /.
LONG RAW NULL binary_value
) TABLESPACE gam_lgtab STORAGE (INITIAL 256 K NEXT 256 K MAXEXTENTS PCTINCREASE 0 unlimited)
/
ALTER TABLE gam_attribute_bin ADD)
CONSTRAINT gam_attribute_bin_pk
UNIQUE (attribute_owner_type, owner_id, attribute_name)
USING INDEX
TABLESPACE gam_ind
STORAGE (INITIAL 256 K NEXT 256 K MAXEXTENTS PCTINCREASE 0 unlimited)
)
/
Suppression of REM binary attribute when necessary
CREATE TRIGGER gam_att_delete
AFTER YOU REMOVE gam_attribute
FOR EACH LINE
BEGIN
IF (: old.attribute_data_type = 'B')
THEN
DELETE FROM gam_attribute_bin
WHERE attribute_owner_type =: old.attribute_owner_type
AND attribute_name =: old.attribute_name
AND owner_id =: old.owner_id;
END IF;
END;
/
ERROR on line 1:
ORA-04089: cannot create triggers on the objects belonged to SYS
hope someone can help me clear this up thanks

Hello

You code works very well for me. I had to change to run on my system tablespaces, but otherwise, what you posted worked for me when I tried (in a different schema than SYS, of course).

Index on the primary table becomes UNUSABLE after Exchange of partition
Hello!

I am the scene changes to partition and somehow, I see that the partition that I Exchange eventually becomes "UNUSABLE".

The steps that I'm following:

1. creating the temporary table:

CREATE TABLE TEMP_TKTHEADER
AS SELECT * FROM T3TKTHEADER
WHERE 1 = 2

2. replacement of the partition

ALTER TABLE T3TKTHEADER
PART08Q1Q2 PARTITION EXCHANGE
WITH TABLE TEMP_TKTHEADER

After the Exchange is carried out and I ask the stats of the index on the primary table (T3TKTHEADER as in this case):

INDEX_NAME NOM_PARTITION STATUS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XTKTHDR1 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR10 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR11 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR12 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR13 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR14 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR2 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR3 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR4 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR5 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR6 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR7 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR8 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE
XTKTHDR9 PART08Q1Q2 UNUSABLE

This is normal behavior!
Is not swap Partition just supposed to change the pointer to the partition of the temporary table data and leave the rest of the table intact!

Thank you
AB007
Dear AB007,

Please see subpart of swap partition. I assumed that the version of your database is GR 11, 2;

http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e10592/statements_3001.htm#BABHHAHF
```
INCLUDING | EXCLUDING INDEXES Specify INCLUDING INDEXES  if you want local index partitions or subpartitions to be exchanged with the corresponding table index (for a nonpartitioned table) or local indexes (for a hash-partitioned table).
Specify EXCLUDING INDEXES  if you want all index partitions or subpartitions corresponding to the partition and all the regular indexes and index partitions on the exchanged table to be marked UNUSABLE.
```
Hope that helps.

Ogan

BlackBerry Smartphones Runtime error "Cannot find system in the file table.

I need help!

I have a Blackberry Curve 8310 and have recently installed Version 4.5

I'm trying to set my synchronization. I followed the steps to set up my Outlook 2007 calendar. He told me congratulations! You have configured the product. However, when I press Finish, I get a runtime error "cannot find system in the file table.

I uninstalled the program and reinstalled - the same error.

Any help would be appreciated!

FIGURED IT OUT!

The following steps, which are displayed on the RIM support will work; However, I had to do it another way. In step 1, it says that ilxolkCompanion.fil is located in the path C:\Program Research In Motion\BlackBerry\Connectors\MS Outlook Connector... However, when I searched this file, it was actually located in C:\Program Files\Blackberry\Connectors\MS Outlook Connector. (Maybe it's because I upgraded from 4.2.2 to 4.5 w/o filling a clean uninstall... not too sure why)

Once I located the file via the command prompt, I have not recorded in accordance with the instructions of step 1. I then followed step 2 exactly Word for Word... and VOILA! I have now Version 4.5, working with MS Outlook 2007

Resolution

If the connectors folder is always present in C\Program Research In Motion\BlackBerry\Connectors\MS Outlook Connector, follow these steps:
1. Unregister the old of the Microsoft Outlook ilxolkCompanion.filconnector.
  1. Open the command prompt.
  2. Navigate to C:\Program research in Motion\BlackBerry\Connectors\MS Outlook Connector.
  3. Type command regsvr32 u ilxolkCompanion.fil.
  4. In Desktop Manager, Microsoft Outlook is no longer appears as an available desktop application.
2. Save the latest Microsoft Outlook Connector.
  1. Navigate to C:\Program research in Motion\BlackBerry\IS71 Connectors\MS Outlook Connector.
  2. Type the command regsvr32 msoutlookconnector.fil.
  3. Office Manager, Microsoft Outlook will be now stored as an available desktop application.
Once these steps have been completed, configure synchronization again.

Create ctxsys.ctxcat index in the object Table
What I'm trying to do is to create an index of type ctxsys.ctxcat on 'col3 '. But this 'col3' is not a 'TABLE', but in an object, as follows:

CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TestObj AS OBJECT
(
col1 varchar2 (10),
col2 varchar2 (10),
COL3 varchar2 (10),
COL4 varchar2 (10)
);

CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE AS THE TestObj TABLE TestTable;

Now, how can I create an index of type ctxsys.ctxcat on 'col3 '?

create index test_ind on TestTable (col3) indextype is ctxsys.ctxcat;?

Thank you for helping.

Scott
You cannot index a user-defined data type. Indexes are used for persistent storage of persistent objects.

What I suspect you really want is an associative array or an array indexed by integer binary. Demos here:

http://www.morganslibrary.org/reference/arrays.html

A different function is created instead of the expected (table Index instead of initialize array) Labview - a 8.5

Hey all,.

I have a really strange behavior here. I'm using LabView 8.5. I open a white VI and try to use the function "initialize the array.

No matter where and how I find (using search functions, or by accessing the 7.x-> table-> table initialize function), when I drag and drop it off at my VI, what I get is "Array Index" instead!

Even when I hover over the icon table inside the palette is initialized, with aid switched on (Ctrl + H), what I see is the help page for table of Index. It's as if somehow the index table replaced function Initialize array entirely, with the exception of the simple icon in the palette...

I tried to restart Labview and my computer nothing works.

Someone at - he never experience a similar problem? that means, one different function other than for being created. I have attached a screenshot.

Thank you

-Anne Marie

Thanks for your replies.

My palette is screwed a bit isn't it? Most likely because the installation I chose a bunch of older versions in favor... and I regret it now.

Funny enough, during the search in the functions that it only brings me version 7.x of functions of table etc... but I can manually find the standard in my palette, and of course, version 8.5 standard functions seem to work...

I need to finally do an install of cean, but for now, it's all good!

Thank you

Anne Marie

Drop and re-create the index on the current table
Hello

I just have a few questions about the removal and creating indexes on a table that activates a lot.

Let me explain first:

The table is used by the application with the DML statements every 3 seconds and I want to do is to drop the indexes and re-create them.
But Im worried about the consequences - what happens when I try to recreate the indexes and the table has an option rowlock/used by the application?

P.S
It's production environment - so I can't stop the application.

BR / Ander
A reconstructed index either Online or Offline.

Online index rebuild features:

ALTER INDEX REBUILD ONLINE;

LMD is allowed on the base table
It's relatively slow
Base table is targeted for the new index
Base table is locked in shared mode and DOF is not possible
Intermediate table stores changes to data in the base table, during the rebuilding of indexes to update the new index later

Offline index rebuild features:

ALTER INDEX REBUILD. (Default)
Does not refer to the base of the table and the base table is exclusively locked
New index is created from the old index
Not possible DML and DDL on the base table
Relatively faster

Cannot create partition during the Windows installation.

Hey

You have a problem with the installation of Windows (10 or 8.1, same problem). I share the part Boot Camp using the tool, but once I'm in the installer that I meet a problem. I format the BOOTCAMP partition scored, but then Windows says that it cannot create a new partition.

Some impressions diskutil

/ dev/disk0 (internal, physical):

#: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

0: GUID_partition_scheme * GB 121,3 disk0

1: disk0s1 EFI EFI 209.7 MB

2: Apple_CoreStorage GB internal drive 121.0 disk0s2

3: disk0s3 Apple_Boot Boot OS X 134,2 MB

/ dev/disk1 (internal, physical):

#: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

0: GUID_partition_scheme * 1.0 TB disk1

1: EFI EFI 209.7 MB disk1s1

2: Apple_CoreStorage GB internal Drive disk1s2 648.9

3: disk1s3 Apple_Boot Recovery 650.0 MB HD

4: Microsoft data base 350,5 GB disk1s4

/ dev/disk2 (internal, virtual):

#: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

0: Apple_HFS Macintosh HD + 764,0 GB disk2

Logical volume on disk0s2, disk1s2

4B58E1CE-F3F4-4E82-974B-019D1DC8A5B9

Fusion unencrypted drive

List of CS

CoreStorage groups of logical volumes (1 found)

|

+ Logical Volume - Group C4FDFFD0-7D27-4DCC-9034-2D19E7487DCD

=========================================================

Name: Internal drive

Status: online

Dimensions: 769855381504 B (769,9 GB)

Free space: 180224 B (180.2 KB)

|

+-< physical="" volume="">

|   ----------------------------------------------------

|   Index: 0

|   Disc: disk0s2

|   Status: online

|   Dimensions: 120988852224 B (121.0 GB)

|

+-< physical="" volume="">

|   ----------------------------------------------------

|   Index: 1

|   Disc: disk1s2

|   Status: online

|   Dimensions: 648866529280 B (648,9 GB)

|

+-> FDD23DD2-C30E-4575-B7B1-50CBCB539D10 family of Logical Volume

----------------------------------------------------------

Encryption type: no

|

+--> Logical Volume 4B58E1CE-F3F4-4E82-974B-019D1DC8A5B9

---------------------------------------------------

Disc: disk2

Status: online

Size (Total): 763999944704 B (764,0 GB)

Reversible: no

Name: Macintosh HD

Volume name: Macintosh HD

Content indicator: Apple_HFS

LVG Type: Fusion, sparse

See the TPG: / dev/disk0: mediasize = 121332826112; SectorSize = 512; blocks = 236978176

See the TPG: / dev/disk0: PMBR to sector 0

See the TPG: / dev/disk0: Pri GPT to sector 1

See the TPG: / dev/disk0: GPT Sec at sector 236978175

start index size summary

0 1 PMBR

1 1 Pri GPT header

2 32 table GPT Pri

34 6

40 409600 1 part TPG - C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B

409640 236306352 2 part TPG - 53746F72-6167-11AA-AA11-00306543ECAC

236715992 262144 3 part TPG - 426F6F74-0000-11AA-AA11-00306543ECAC

236978136 7

236978143 32 table dry GPT

236978175 1 dry GPT header

Daniels-iMac: ~ danielzandian$ sudo fdisk/dev/disk0

Disk: geometry / dev/disk0: 14751/255/63 [236978176 sectors]

Signature: 0xAA55

From end

#: cyl hd s - cyl hd s id [Start - size]

------------------------------------------------------------------------

1: EA 1023 254 63 - 1023 254 63 [1-236978175]

02:00 0 0 0-0 0 0 [0-0] unused

03:00 0 0 0-0 0 0 [0-0] unused

04:00 0 0 0-0 0 0 [0-0] unused

You can also post the output of

sudo TPG - vv - r see the/dev/disk1

sudo fdisk/dev/disk1

What is the year/model of your Mac?

Debug log 5 Apex: "cannot find index for the item.

I just spotted some strange output in the debug log in an application built in 4.0, still, using this mode of compatibility, now in 5.0.1
Some error messages for crawlers
```
Fetch application meta data
can not find index for component (3,15469335749905175)
can not find region index for region #15469335749905175 when trying to add (1,15481314906419581) - it must be excluded because of REQUIRED_PATCH
```
Can anyone advise me on what it means? Or what other information of interest?
Nothing seems to be a problem with the page. The specified region is extremely basic html with a compilation option that is excluded. Other regions with the same compilation option do not report these log files in the debug.
Scott.

Hi Scott,.

It is indeed related to the build option and you can ignore the messages. I'll put their debug level 9 If you don't see them in the normal debug output.

Before the page is rendered, APEX load relevant metadata in the wwv_flow package global variables. For example, fill us the tables g_items, the g_buttons and the g_plugs with the definitions of element, button and region, respectively. We do not charge the definitions of components that are excluded by a compilation option. After loading these data, we must build relationships between records, for example, we calculate index of the item in the g_plugs region and store it with the definition of the element. If the region is excluded by a compiler option, but the underlying element is not, the computation of the element cannot find the related region folder in g_plugs. You get messages from debugging for this kind of inconsistencies.

Kind regards

Christian

Cannot create indexes on the flow table

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for