Central instance is necessary

If all we want is transfer to source, can ignore us the central instance?

Yes we can

Tags: Oracle Applications

Similar Questions

no free 5 domain after activating Central 1.2(1a) ucs

I did all the actions described here, but the grace period is still growing:
```
 ucs00(service-reg) /license # show usage detail License instance: UCS_CENTRAL_ACTIVATION_PKG Scope: Server Default: 5 Total Quant: 5 Used Quant: 0 State: License Ok Peer Count Comparison: No Peer Grace Used: 0 License instance: UCS_CENTRAL_DOMAIN_REGN_PKG Scope: Server Default: 5 Total Quant: 5 Used Quant: 5 State: License Graceperiod Peer Count Comparison: No Peer Grace Used: 1184400 
```
What I did wrong? Why is not using the UCS_CENTRAL_ACTIVATION_PKG licenses?

I ran this by the license expert in the core team of the UCS. Install the licenses are a step of both parties - download the license to the central instance of the UCS and then click on it and select Install. The screenshot is similar to a system where the license of UCS_Central_Activation_Pkg has not been installed. When the license has been installed on our test system, UCS_Central_Activation_Pkg licenses have been used and the grace period fell 0.

More details about the installation of a license are part of the UCS Central user's Guide for the software to http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/unified_computing/ucs/ucs-central/u....

We have seen this problem with several clients and strive to improve the experience in a future release.

UCS_Central_Activation_Pkg license is tied to the L-UCS-CTR-INI = PID.

If this does not resolve the problem, I would advise you open a TAC case.

Error loading credit using planning instance configuration management target

Hi all
I'm migrating Oracle credit functional configuration management (model Scoring list, automation rules) of the source to the target instance instance. I am trying to achieve through the use of planning. Once the load completed, I get the following error and configurations are not migrated. This error only appears for the configuration of credit management. Not for the other features. Please help me on this.
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Implementation of the application: Version: 12.0.0
Copyright (c) 1979, 1999, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Module AZR12LOADER: planning Loader R12
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Current system time is October 9, 2013 03:15:18
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Simultaneous request parameters
******************************
RELOAD_REQUEST_ID =
DBC_FILE_NAME = DEVF. DBC
SNAPSHOT_REQUEST_TYPE = E
Nom_snap = Test credit RAC management
RELOAD_METHOD =
REQUEST_TYPE = L
IS_REMOTE = Y
JOB_NAME = RAC credit management Test1
USER_NAME = DEPPS
Download of the excerpt from the central instance
Managed to copy the snippet
Time required to download extract and write in the file zip = 0 seconds
Validation of first extract...
Driver.xml analysis
Time needed to analyze the driver file and build the milliseconds of objects: 6 installation
API to sort based on their addiction...
Time required to sort the API = 12 milliseconds
Print sorting API
*********************
Loading sequence 1
*************
(1) AR_CMGT_Scores
October 9, 2013 03:15:48 oracle.adf.share.config.ADFConfigFactory findOrCreateADFConfig
INFO: oracle.adf.share.config.ADFConfigFactory no META-INF/adf - config.xml not found
******************************************
Name: AR_CMGT_Scores
Type: BC4J
Path: oracle.apps.ar.ispeed.creditmgt.scores.server.ScoresAM
Time Taken (seconds): 2.0
Lines in the xml file import and validating the lines...
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = oracle.jbo.RowCreateException: Houston-25017: error when creating a new entity for ScoresEO line.
java.lang.Integer incompatible with java.lang.Long
;
-----------------------------------------
Not found message. Application: AZ, Message name: AZW_FWK_USER_ROW_EXCEPTION. Chips: VONAME = odds; Score model KEY = Id = "null".
; EXCEPTION = updates are not supported by this API.
;
-----------------------------------------
74 rows processed, now showing the changes to the database...
-----------------------------------------
Committed transaction.
-----------------------------------------
API:AR_CMGT_Scores transformed
Status: WARNING
******************************************
Simultaneous program ends.
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Beginning of the FND_FILE log messages
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
End of the FND_FILE log messages
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Options, AutoComplete, the request for enforcement.
End of query options AutoComplete.
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Simultaneous request ended
Current system time is October 9, 2013 03:15:50
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Please make sure that you have applied patches (error when used with Oracle credit Management (OCM) to transfer installation (Doc ID 1129843.1) planning data).

Thank you

Hussein

R12 I have setup error simultaneous loading program

Hi all
I have seen and error so that he tried the zip that is exported from the source of the instance instance target.
the export is completed successfully, but I get the error while trying to download the zip to the instance target below.
Simultaneous request parameters
******************************
JOB_NAME = MOLSA_CONC
USER_NAME = SYSADMIN
DBC_FILE_NAME =
IS_REMOTE = N
REQUEST_TYPE = E
Download of the excerpt from the central instance
Managed to copy the snippet
Time required to download extract and write in the file zip = 0 seconds
Driver.xml analysis
Time needed to analyze the driver file and build milliseconds of configuration objects: 5
Processing API: FND_ConcPrograms
java.lang.NullPointerException
in java.io.Reader. < init > (Reader.java:78)
in java.io.InputStreamReader. < init > (InputStreamReader.java:72)
at oracle.apps.az.r12.api.FNDAPI.createAPIEntityItems(FNDAPI.java:703)
at oracle.apps.az.r12.extractor.cpserver.UploaderContextImpl.validateExtract(UploaderContextImpl.java:183)
at oracle.apps.az.r12.extractor.cpserver.UploaderContextImpl.upload(UploaderContextImpl.java:112)
at oracle.apps.az.r12.extractor.cpserver.UploaderCp.runProgram(UploaderCp.java:74)
at oracle.apps.fnd.cp.request.Run.main(Run.java:156)
Kind regards
Ahmed

It was solved by Oracle support

Here is the resolution:

Please confirm if the following hotfix is applied

21314570:R12.AZ. C CANNOT LOAD/TRANSFORM THROUGH PLANNING

Otherwise please apply the patch and then repeat the test.

Passage of custody of data with broker fails with ORA-16570 / ORA-16665

I'm using Data Guard 11 g on Windows Server 2012 64 Bit. Recently, I have configured the broker to manage the permutations more uncomfortable.
Unfortunately the digital switchover does not work. Broker Setup seems fine, since I can activate t and redo apply works perfectly...
Now, the behavior is as follows... Once I put the passage through brokers, it shows the following:
DGMGRL > passage to the smart_stb
Continue to pass, please wait...
Error: ORA-16665: wait for the result of a database
Failed.
Unable to failover, primary database is always "smart".
The digital switchover happens, there is no restart of the primary database well! Does not appear to be linked to a DGMGRL buggy service entrance. In fact the database will not yet descended. The principal is supending all processes while trying to do so. Broker runs into a timeout, of course, but the principal remains in a State of supending. The primary doesn't seem to be able to cominicate with side standby or vice versa. Which is strange since the restoration of log shipping and apply is workng fine as mentioned... do a manual failover. I don't know what could cause this kind of behavior... Double checked everything. Once I restart the two databases and align on the rule of law that the digital transition is complete. But Needless to say that it is not intending to use the broker...
Primary DRC.log States the following:
2014-09-10 746441090-02000000 MICHAEL 09:13:01.378: PASSAGE to smart_stb
2014-09-10 746441090-02000000 MICHAEL 09:13:01.378: start execution of the task: the DIGITAL switchover
2014-09-10 09:13:01.378 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DGCI_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:13:01.409 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DGCI_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:13:01.409 02001000 746441090 notifier Oracle Clusterware to the primary database of disassembly for the DIGITAL switchover
2014-09-10 09:13:01.425 ACLS: not configured CRS, config = 2
.
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:01.425: display primary instances for PASSAGE of phase 1
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:01.425: State of rfi_post_instances() for CTL_SWITCH = ORA-00000
2014-09-10 09:13:01.425 INSV: message received for publication of inter - the instance
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:01.425: dispersants message to STANDBY for TRANSITION phase BEGIN
2014-09-10 09:13:01.425 req ID 1.1.746441090, CTL_SWITCH opcode, phase BEGIN, 5 flags
2014-09-10 09:13:01.425 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:01.425: entered rfmsoexinst() for phase BEGIN
2014-09-10 09:13:01.425 INSV: response for message with
2014-09-10 09:13:01.425 req ID 1.1.746441090, CTL_SWITCH opcode, phase BEGIN
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:01.425: primary instances display for transition to THE phase 2
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:01.440: State of rfi_post_instances() for CTL_SWITCH = ORA-00000
2014-09-10 09:13:01.440 INSV: message received for publication of inter - the instance
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:01.440: dispersants message to STANDBY for transition to THE phase of DISMANTLING
2014-09-10 09:13:01.440 req ID 1.1.746441090, opcode CTL_SWITCH, disassembling, 5 flags
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:01.440: entered rfmsoexinst() for disassembling
2014-09-10 09:13:01.440 RSM0: received the State value ask: rid = 0 x 01041001, sid = 0, phid = 1, econd = 2, sitehndl = 0 x 02001000
2014-09-10 09:13:01.440 Log transport resources: SetState OFFLINE, DISASSEMBLY phase, external Cond SWITCH-OVER-PHYS_STBY
2014-09-10 09:13:01.440 RSM0: received the State value ask: rid = 0 x 01011001, sid = 4, phid = 1, econd = 2, sitehndl = 0 x 02001000
2014-09-10 09:13:01.440 of database Resource [IAM = PRIMARY]: 0 x 02001000 SetState PHYSICAL-APPLY-ON, DISASSEMBLY phase, external Cond SWITCH-OVER-PHYS_STBY, handful of Site target
2014-09-10 09:13:01.440 RSM0: execution of SQL [ALTER DATABASE COMMIT to SWITCH STANDBY mode PHYSICS WITH the STOP of the SESSION]
2014-09-10 09:13:06.630 SQL [ALTER DATABASE COMMETTRE at PHYSICS CROSSING SHALL WITH SESSION SHUTDOWN] executed successfully
2014-09-10 09:13:06.630 RSM: compensation IncarnationTable internal property of the site 0 x 01010000
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:06.630: Broker determines this restart of the instance is necessary: operation = status = ORA-16570
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 09:13:06.630 resources: smart (01011001) State: PHYSICAL-APPLY-ON
2014-09-10 09:13:06.630 INSV: response for message with
2014-09-10 09:13:06.630 req ID 1.1.746441090, CTL_SWITCH, disassembling opcode
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:06.630: Instance 'smart' (ID 1) returned ORA-16570
2014-09-10 09:13:06.630 02001000 746441090 for disassembling of the CTL_SWITCH operation
2014-09-10 09:13:06.646 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DGCI_CDESC
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:06.646: primary instances display for transition to THE phase 2
2014-09-10 09:13:06.646 INSV: message received for publication of inter - the instance
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:06.646: State of rfi_post_instances() for CTL_SWITCH = ORA-00000
2014-09-10 09:13:06.646 req ID 1.1.746441090, opcode CTL_SWITCH, disassembling, 5 flags
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:06.646: dispersants message to STANDBY for transition to THE phase of DISMANTLING
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:06.646: entered rfmsoexinst() for disassembling
2014-09-10 09:13:06.646 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:13:06.646 INSV: response for message with
2014-09-10 09:13:06.646 req ID 1.1.746441090, CTL_SWITCH, disassembling opcode
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:06.646: Instance 'smart' (ID 1) returned ORA-16570
2014-09-10 09:13:06.646 02001000 746441090 for disassembling of the CTL_SWITCH operation
2014-09-10 09:13:28.619 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:13:28.619 NSV1: smart_stb returned ORA-16665 Site.
2014-09-10 09:13:43.620 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:13:43.620 NSV1: smart_stb returned ORA-16665 Site.
2014-09-10 09:13:58.639 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:13:58.639 NSV1: smart_stb returned ORA-16665 Site.
2014-09-10 09:14:13.657 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:14:13.657 NSV1: smart_stb returned ORA-16665 Site.
2014-09-10 09:14:28.674 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:14:28.674 NSV1: smart_stb returned ORA-16665 Site.
2014-09-10 09:14:43.676 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:14:43.676 NSV1: smart_stb returned ORA-16665 Site.
2014-09-10 09:14:58.693 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:14:58.693 NSV1: smart_stb returned ORA-16665 Site.
2014-09-10 09:15:13.695 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:15:13.695 NSV1: smart_stb returned ORA-16665 Site.
2014-09-10 09:15:28.707 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:15:28.707 NSV1: smart_stb returned ORA-16665 Site.
2014-09-10 09:15:43.724 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:15:43.724 NSV1: smart_stb returned ORA-16665 Site.
2014-09-10 09:15:58.726 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:15:58.726 NSV1: smart_stb returned ORA-16665 Site.
2014-09-10 09:16:13.727 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DB_INST_CDESC
2014-09-10 09:16:13.727 NSV1: smart_stb returned ORA-16665 Site.
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:16:28.729: database smart_stb returned ORA-16665
2014-09-10 09:16:28.729 02001000 746441090 opcode = CTL_SWITCH, phase = DISASSEMBLY, req_id = 1.1.746441090
2014-09-10 09:16:28.729 02001000 746441090 CTL_SWITCH operation cancelled during phase 2, error = ORA-16665
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:16:28.729: ORA-16665 stateful failover operation failed
2014-09-10 09:16:28.729 NSV1: using RFIUPI_DGCI_CDESC
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:16:28.744: display primary instances for PASSAGE of phase 5
2014-09-10 09:16:28.744 INSV: message received for publication of inter - the instance
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:16:28.744: State of rfi_post_instances() for CTL_SWITCH = ORA-00000
2014-09-10 09:16:28.744 req ID 1.1.746441090, CTL_SWITCH opcode, phase END, 5 flags
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:16:28.744: passage to the aborted due to errors
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 named Site 09:16:28.744: smart is always primary school
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 error 09:16:28.744 = ORA-16665
DRC.log Eve shows the following:
2014-09-10 09:13:01.352 02001000 746441090 notify Oracle Clusterware base ensures target disassembly of passing data to the
2014-09-10 09:13:01.367 ACLS: not configured CRS, config = 2
.
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:01.367: display of bodies sleep for transition to THE phase 1
2014-09-10 09:13:01.367 INSV: message received for publication of inter - the instance
2014-09-10 09:13:01.367 req ID 1.1.746441090, CTL_SWITCH opcode, phase BEGIN, 5 flags
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:01.367: entered rfmsoexinst() for phase BEGIN
2014-09-10 09:13:01.367 INSV: response for message with
2014-09-10 09:13:01.367 req ID 1.1.746441090, CTL_SWITCH opcode, phase BEGIN
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:01.367: entered rfm_release_chief_lock() for CTL_SWITCH
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:06.571: entered rfm_get_chief_lock() for CTL_SWITCH, reason 0
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:06.571: start execution of the task: the DIGITAL switchover
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:06.586: display of bodies sleep for transition to THE phase 2
2014-09-10 09:13:06.586 INSV: message received for publication of inter - the instance
2014-09-10 09:13:06.586 req ID 1.1.746441090, opcode CTL_SWITCH, disassembling, 5 flags
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:06.586: entered rfmsoexinst() for disassembling
2014-09-10 09:13:06.586 RSM0: received the State value ask: rid = 0 x 02031001, sid = 0, phid = 1, econd = 2, sitehndl = 0 x 02001000
2014-09-10 09:13:06.586 redo apply the resource: SetState OFFLINE, DISASSEMBLY phase, external Cond SWITCH-OVER-PHYS_STBY
2014-09-10 09:13:06.586 RSM0: received the State value ask: rid = 0 x 02012001, sid = 9, phid = 1, econd = 2, sitehndl = 0 x 02001000
2014-09-10 09:13:06.586 of database Resource [IAM = PHYSICS]: handle target SetState-READ-WRITE-XPTON Site, DISMANTLING phase, external SWITCH-OVER-PHYS_STBY, 0 x 02001000 Cond
2014-09-10 09:13:06.586 RSM0: execution of SQL [ALTER DATABASE RECOVER MANAGED STANDBY DATABASE CANCEL]
2014-09-10 09:13:07.602 SQL [ALTER DATABASE RECOVER MANAGED STANDBY DATABASE CANCEL] executed successfully
2014-09-10 09:13:07.711 RSM0: execution of SQL [ALTER DATABASE RECOVER MANAGED STANDBY DATABASE through FINAL passage to THE NODELAY]
2014-09-10 09:13:09.509 SQL [ALTER DATABASE RECOVER MANAGED STANDBY DATABASE BY LAST crossing THE NODELAY] executed successfully
2014-09-10 09:13:09.509 RSM0: execution of SQL [ALTER DATABASE COMMIT to SWITCHING to the MAIN WAITING WITH the STOP of the SESSION]
2014-09-10 09:13:11.345 SQL [ALTER DATABASE COMMETTRE to TRANSITION to PRIMARY WAIT WITH SESSION SHUTDOWN] executed successfully
2014-09-10 09:13:11.345 of database Resource successful SetState
2014-09-10 09:13:11.345 INSV: response for message with
2014-09-10 09:13:11.345 req ID 1.1.746441090, CTL_SWITCH, disassembling opcode
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:13:11.345: entered rfm_release_chief_lock() for CTL_SWITCH
2014-09-10 09:13:28.555 drcx: found the task req_id = 1.1.746441090, PROBE, but the phase is carried out
2014-09-10 09:13:43.555 drcx: found the task req_id = 1.1.746441090, PROBE, but the phase is carried out
2014-09-10 09:13:58.571 drcx: found the task req_id = 1.1.746441090, PROBE, but the phase is carried out
2014-09-10 09:14:13.590 drcx: found the task req_id = 1.1.746441090, PROBE, but the phase is carried out
2014-09-10 09:14:28.605 drcx: found the task req_id = 1.1.746441090, PROBE, but the phase is carried out
2014-09-10 09:14:43.606 drcx: found the task req_id = 1.1.746441090, PROBE, but the phase is carried out
2014-09-10 09:14:58.622 drcx: found the task req_id = 1.1.746441090, PROBE, but the phase is carried out
2014-09-10 09:15:13.625 drcx: found the task req_id = 1.1.746441090, PROBE, but the phase is carried out
2014-09-10 09:15:28.641 drcx: found the task req_id = 1.1.746441090, PROBE, but the phase is carried out
2014-09-10 09:15:43.646 drcx: found the task req_id = 1.1.746441090, PROBE, but the phase is carried out
2014-09-10 09:15:58.652 drcx: found the task req_id = 1.1.746441090, PROBE, but the phase is carried out
2014-09-10 09:16:13.653 drcx: found the task req_id = 1.1.746441090, PROBE, but the phase is carried out
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:16:27.606: Data Guard Broker ending NSV0, timed out waiting for a response from the smart database
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:16:27.825: smart database returned ORA-16662
2014-09-10 09:16:27.825 02001000 746441090 opcode = CTL_SWITCH, phase = RESYNCHRONIZATION, req_id = 1.1.746441090
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:16:42.840: Data Guard Broker ending NSV0, timed out waiting for a response from the smart database
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:16:42.840: smart database returned ORA-16662
2014-09-10 09:16:42.840 02001000 746441090 opcode = CTL_SWITCH, phase = RESYNCHRONIZATION, req_id = 1.1.746441090
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:16:57.861: Data Guard Broker ending NSV0, timed out waiting for a response from the smart database
2014 09-10 02001000 746441090 MICHAEL 09:16:57.861: smart database returned ORA-16662
2014-09-10 09:16:57.861 02001000 746441090 opcode = CTL_SWITCH, phase = RESYNCHRONIZATION, req_id = 1.1.746441090
2014-09-10 09:16:58.705 746441091 00001000 MICHAEL: entered rfm_get_chief_lock() for HEALTH_CHECK, reason 0
2014-09-10 09:16:58.705 746441091 00001000 MICHAEL: task to free the 1.1.746441090 orphans, opcode = CTL_SWITCH.
2014-09-10 09:16:58.705 746441091 00001000 MICHAEL: start the task execution: automated healthcheck
2014-09-10 09:16:58.720 746441091 00001000 MICHAEL: start-up of the health check
2014-09-10 09:16:58.720 INSV: message received for publication of inter - the instance
2014-09-10 09:16:58.720 746441091 00001000 MICHAEL: rfi_post_instances() status = ORA-00000
2014-09-10 09:16:58.720 req ID 1.1.746441091, HEALTH_CHECK opcode, phase BEGIN, 5 flags
2014 09-10 00000000 746441091 MICHAEL 09:16:58.720: entered rfmhcexinst
2014 09-10 00000000 746441091 MICHAEL 09:16:58.720: rfmhcexinst call transfer
2014-09-10 09:16:58.720 RSM0: receipt get status request: rid = 0 x 02012001, sid = 4
2014-09-10 09:16:58.720 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK ERROR: ORA-16816: incorrect database role
2014-09-10 09:16:58.720 WARNING: given RCS 281474976710655 with resetlogs_id = 851952614 is less than resetlogs_change # 744657 of the incarnation.
2014-09-10 09:16:58.736 current IncarnationTable value is:
2014-09-10 09:16:58.736 2,744657,851952614,1, * 851351631, 1, 1, 0, #.
2014-09-10 09:16:58.736 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK ERROR: ORA-16700: the standby database has diverged from the primary database
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 00000000 746441091 HEALTH_CHECK operation cancelled during phase 1, error = ORA-16810
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 RSM0: receipt get status request: rid = 0 x 02031001, sid = 1
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 00000000 746441091 MICHAEL: standby Instance completed the health check
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 INSV: response for message with
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 req ID 1.1.746441091, HEALTH_CHECK opcode, phase BEGIN
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 MICHAEL: HEALTH CHECK ERROR: ORA-16766: redo apply is stopped
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 MICHAEL: aggregation based on H/C, db 0 x 02001000 has gravity = 16501, status = 16810
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 00000000 746441091 HEALTH_CHECK operation cancelled during phase 1, error = ORA-16810
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 INSV: message received for publication of inter - the instance
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 req ID 1.1.746441091, HEALTH_CHECK opcode, phase BEGIN, flags 20005
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 MICHAEL: aggregation based on H/C, db 0 x 02001000 has gravity = 16501, status = 16810
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 INSV: response for message with
2014-09-10 09:16:58.970 req ID 1.1.746441091, HEALTH_CHECK opcode, phase BEGIN
2014 09-10 00000000 746441091 MICHAEL 09:17:02.017: entered rfm_release_chief_lock() for HEALTH_CHECK
2014-09-10 09:17:13.724 drcx: task req_id is not found = 1.1.746441091 for PROBE.
2014-09-10 09:17:28.730 drcx: task req_id is not found = 1.1.746441091 for PROBE.
Primary alert.log indicates the following:
LNS: Standby redo log file selected for thread 1 sequence 12046 for destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2
My Nov 10 09:13:01, 2014
ALTER DATABASE COMMIT TO SWITCH STANDBY MODE PHYSICS WITH THE STOP OF THE SESSION
My Nov 10 09:13:01, 2014
Thread 1 Advanced to record the sequence 12047 (switch LGWR)
Currently Journal # 2 seq # 12047 mem # 0: X:\SMART\LOG1\SMART_21.LOG
Currently Journal # 2 seq # 12047 mem # 1: Y:\SMART\LOG2\SMART_22.LOG
Stop background QMNC process
My Nov 10 09:13:01, 2014
Arc1: Evaluating archive log 1 thread 1 sequence 12046
CLOSING: kill the server sessions.
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 15708 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W000)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 15708 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W000)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 13372 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W001)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 13372 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W001)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 15708 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W000)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 15708 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W000)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 13372 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W001)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 13372 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W001)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 15708 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W000)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 15708 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W000)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 13372 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W001)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 13372 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W001)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 15708 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W000)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 15708 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W000)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 13372 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W001)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 13372 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W001)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 15708 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W000)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 15708 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W000)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 13372 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W001)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 13372 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W001)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 15708 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W000)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 15708 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W000)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 13372 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W001)"
Program 'SYSTEM' of active processes 13372 user ' ORACLE. EXE (W001)"
CLOSED: all the closing of sessions successfully.
krss_find_arc: selection ARC2 to receive the message as a last resort
Waiting for all non-current archive ORLs...
Waiting for thread 1 sequence 12046 ORL to archive...
My Nov 10 09:13:02 2014
Arc0: Assessment of 1 thread 1 sequence 12046 log archives
My Nov 10 09:13:02 2014
ARC2: Evaluating archive log 1 thread 1 sequence 12046
Arc0: Unable to archive the thread 1 sequence 12046
Newspapers archived by another process
ARC2: Impossible to archive the thread 1 sequence 12046
Newspapers archived by another process
Involved the creation of the archivelog 'W:\SMART\ARC\SMART_12046_1_851952614.ARC '.
Archived journal 19372 extra for each sequence 1 12046 0xab72f94c dest ID thread entry 1:
ENT for thread 1 12046 sequence have been archived...
All non-current ORLs have been archived.
Waiting for all FAL entries to archive...
All FAL entries were archived.
Waiting for dest_id 2 can be synchronized...
OCISessionBegin with PasswordVerifier succeeded
Client pid [12320] annexed to the RFS pid [3648] number of the remote instance [1] to dest "smart_dg_stb."
Physical passage target Active, synchronized sleep has been identified
Transition to the end-of-Redo Log thread 1 sequence 12047 has been fixed
The digital switchover: primary YVERT seen above the value 0x0.0x22345d2
ARCH: Noswitch of archiving the thread 1, sequence 12047
ARCH: End-of-Redo archive thread 1 sequence 12047 branch
ARCH: Evaluating archive log 2 thread 1 sequence 12047
ARCH: LGWR is actively archiving destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2
ARCH: Transmitting the activation 0xab72f94c ID
OCISessionBegin with PasswordVerifier succeeded
Client pid [12244] annexed to the RFS pid [9972] number of the remote instance [1] to dest "smart_dg_stb."
ARCH: Standby redo log file selected for thread 1 sequence 12047 for destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2
Involved the creation of the archivelog 'W:\SMART\ARC\SMART_12047_1_851952614.ARC '.
Archived journal 19373 extra for each sequence 1 12047 0xab72f94c dest ID thread entry 1:
Archived journal 19374 extra for each sequence 1 12047 0xab72f94c dest ID thread entry 2:
ARCH: Archiving is disabled due to the current archive log file
Primary will check some generator of target of receiving of alls again
Final inspection for a target standby synchronized. Verification will be made once.
ARCH: Transmitting the activation 0xab72f94c ID
LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 is a potential target of the transition to physical standby
Active, synchronized target has been identified
Target has received also redo all the
-----------------------------------------------------------
| Target the waking state.
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2: RECEIVED ALL DATA.
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_3: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_4: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_5: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_6: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_7: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_8: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_9: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_10: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_11: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_12: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_13: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_14: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_15: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_16: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_17: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_18: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_19: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_20: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_21: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_22: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_23: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_24: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_25: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_26: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_27: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_28: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_29: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_30: NO ACTIVE |
| LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_31: NO ACTIVE |
------------------------------------------------------------
Backup controlfile written to find the D:\ORACLE\ORA_DBA\SMART\TRACE\diag\rdbms\smart\smart\trace\smart_rsm0_12244.trc file
Compensation pending activation ID 2876438860 (0xab72f94c)
The primary database controlfile is created using the
Clause 'MAXLOGFILES 255'.
There is space for the log files waiting for redo up to 251
Use the following SQL commands on the standby database to create
waiting for redo logfiles that correspond to the primary database:
ALTER DATABASE add STANDBY LOGFILE 'srl1.f' SIZE 52428800.
ALTER DATABASE add STANDBY LOGFILE 'srl2.f' SIZE 52428800.
ALTER DATABASE add STANDBY LOGFILE 'srl3.f' SIZE 52428800.
ALTER DATABASE add STANDBY LOGFILE 'srl4.f' SIZE 52428800.
ALTER DATABASE add STANDBY LOGFILE 'srl5.f' SIZE 52428800.
ARCHIVELOG for thread 1 sequence 12047 required for recovery of the eve
The digital switchover: converted primary Controlfile controlfile standby successfully.
The digital switchover: Complete - closing of the database required
Completed: ALTER DATABASE COMMIT to SWITCH STANDBY mode PHYSICS WITH the STOP of the SESSION
My Nov 10 09:13:20 2014
(Ospid 12320) process is suspended due to the transition to a physical relief operation.
My Nov 10 09:16:58 2014
(Ospid 12244) process is suspended due to the transition to a physical relief operation.
My Nov 10 09:17:08 2014
Process (ospid 3080) is suspended due to the transition to a physical relief operation.
My Nov 10 09:17:09 2014
Process (ospid 12636) is suspended due to the transition to a physical relief operation.
My Nov 10 09:17:10 2014
Process (ospid 5292) is suspended due to the transition to a physical relief operation.
My Nov 10 09:17:43 2014
RSM0, PID = 12244 process, will be killed
My Nov 10 09:17:44 2014
RSM0 started with pid = 27, OS id = 16280
My Nov 10 09:20:56 2014
minact-RCS: received the error during the scan e:12751 usn:6 useg
minact-SNA: useg scan slip on with error e:12751
My Oct 10 09:21:19 2014
Process (ospid 16280) is suspended due to the transition to a physical relief operation.
My Nov 10 09:22:04 2014
RSM0, PID = 16280 process, will be killed
My Nov 10 09:22:05 2014
RSM0 started with pid = 27, OS id = 10528
My Nov 10 09:25:39 2014
(Ospid 10528) process is suspended due to the transition to a physical relief operation.
My Nov 10 09:26:03 2014
minact-RCS: received the error during the scan e:12751 usn:6 useg
minact-SNA: useg scan slip on with error e:12751
My Nov 10 09:26:24 2014
RSM0, PID = 10528 process, will be killed
My Nov 10 09:26:25 2014
RSM0 started with pid = 27, OS id = 15752
My Nov 10 09:29:59 2014
Process (ospid 15752) is suspended due to the transition to a physical relief operation.
My Nov 10 09:30:44 2014
RSM0, PID = 15752 process, will be killed
My Nov 10 09:30:45 2014
RSM0 started with pid = 27, OS id = 1972
My Nov 10 09:31:09 2014
minact-RCS: received the error during the scan e:12751 usn:6 useg
minact-SNA: useg scan slip on with error e:12751
Suspend action 'Block Cleanout Optim, Undo Segment Scan' MMON 82800 seconds
My Nov 10 09:34:19 2014
Process (ospid, 1972) is suspended due to the transition to a physical relief operation.
alert-journal sleep shows the following:
My Nov 10 09:13:01, 2014
ARC3: Evaluating archive log 5 thread 1 sequence 12046
Involved the creation of the archivelog 'W:\SMART\ARC\SMART_12046_1_851952614.ARC '.
Archived journal 5932 extra for each sequence 1 12046 0xab72f94c dest ID thread entry 1:
My Nov 10 09:13:01, 2014
Media, recovery waiting for thread 1 sequence 12047
My Nov 10 09:13:04 2014
Again shipping customer logged in as PUBLIC
-User is valid
RFS [6]: assigned to the process 3648 RFS
RFS [6]: identified the type of database such as 'physical' standby: customer is ARCH pid 12320
My Nov 10 09:13:06 2014
Again shipping customer logged in as PUBLIC
-User is valid
RFS [7]: assigned to the process 9972 RFS
RFS [7]: identified the type of database such as 'physical' standby: Client is in the foreground pid 12244
RFS [7]: end-of-Redo for thread archiving 1 sequence 12047
RFS [7]: Eve successfully opened journal 5: "Y:\SMART\LOG2\SMART_S_5.LOG."
RFS [7]: Journal selected 5 for thread 1 sequence 12047 dbid-1425016497 branch of the 851952614
My Nov 10 09:13:06 2014
Arc1: Evaluating archive log 5 thread 1 sequence 12047
Involved the creation of the archivelog 'W:\SMART\ARC\SMART_12047_1_851952614.ARC '.
Archived journal 5933 extra for each sequence 1 12047 0xab72f94c dest ID thread entry 1:
My Nov 10 09:13:06 2014
ALTER DATABASE RECOVER MANAGED STANDBY DATABASE CANCEL
MRP0: Background Media Recovery cancelled with status 16037
Errors in the D:\ORACLE\ORA_DBA\SMART\TRACE\diag\rdbms\smart_stb\smart\trace\smart_pr00_13804.trc file:
ORA-16037: user has requested the cancellation of the managed recovery
Managed Standby recovery not using real time applies
Recovery interrupted!
Errors in the D:\ORACLE\ORA_DBA\SMART\TRACE\diag\rdbms\smart_stb\smart\trace\smart_pr00_13804.trc file:
ORA-16037: user has requested the cancellation of the managed recovery
My Nov 10 09:13:07 2014
Errors in the D:\ORACLE\ORA_DBA\SMART\TRACE\diag\rdbms\smart_stb\smart\trace\smart_mrp0_11168.trc file:
ORA-10877: error reported in parallel recovery slave
Completed: ALTER DATABASE RECOVER MANAGED STANDBY DATABASE CANCEL
Data not available for the digital switchover
End-of-REDO the archived log file was not found
Incomplete recovery SCN:0:35846057 archive SCN:0:35866066
ALTER DATABASE RECOVER MANAGED STANDBY DATABASE THROUGH FINAL PASSAGE TO THE NODELAY
has started the process of logmerger
My Nov 10 09:13:07 2014
Managed Standby recovery not using real time applies
Parallel Media Recovery started with 8 slaves
Media W:\SMART\ARC\SMART_12047_1_851952614.ARC recovery log
Identified the SNA 0x0.22345d2 end-of-Redo (failover) for thread 1 sequence 12047
Activation reset sleep ID 2876438860 (0xab72f94c)
Met Media Recovery end Redo indicator
Media recovery applied through change 35866066
Attempt to limbo arscn 0:35866066 irscn 0:35866066
Completed: ALTER DATABASE RECOVER MANAGED STANDBY database through FINAL passage to THE NODELAY
ALTER DATABASE COMMIT TO SWITCHING TO THE MAIN WAITING WITH THE STOP OF THE SESSION
Waiting for the transition from role maximum is 15 minutes.
krsv_proc_kill: kill 2 process (all the RFS)
Backup controlfile written to find the D:\ORACLE\ORA_DBA\SMART\TRACE\diag\rdbms\smart_stb\smart\trace\smart_rsm0_14652.trc file
Passage to the after complete recovery through change 35866066
X:\SMART\LOG1\SMART_11.LOG online journal: thread 1 Group 1 had been previously authorized
Y:\SMART\LOG2\SMART_12.LOG online journal: thread 1 Group 1 had been previously authorized
X:\SMART\LOG1\SMART_21.LOG online journal: thread 1 group 2 was previously disabled
Y:\SMART\LOG2\SMART_22.LOG online journal: thread 1 group 2 was previously disabled
X:\SMART\LOG1\SMART_31.LOG online journal: thread 1 Group 3 has been previously authorized
Y:\SMART\LOG2\SMART_32.LOG online journal: thread 1 Group 3 has been previously authorized
X:\SMART\LOG1\SMART_41.LOG online journal: thread 1 Group 4 has been previously authorized
Y:\SMART\LOG2\SMART_42.LOG online journal: thread 1 Group 4 has been previously authorized
Standby became primary YVERT: 35866064
The digital switchover: completed - mounted as primary database
Completed: ALTER DATABASE COMMIT to SWITCHING to the MAIN WAITING WITH the STOP of the SESSION
My Nov 10 09:13:45 2014
Arc0: become the "no SRL" ARCH
My Nov 10 09:13:46 2014
ARC3: become the "no SRL" ARCH
My Nov 10 09:13:46 2014
Arc1: become the "no SRL" ARCH
My Nov 10 09:16:58 2014
NSV0 started with pid = 26, OS id = 15900
My Oct 10 09:21:20 2014
MICHAEL: NSV0 network call timeout. Kill it now.
The Setup is as follows:
DGMGRL > see the configuration;
Configuration - dg_smart
Protection mode: MaxPerformance
Databases:
Smart - primary database
smart_stb - physical of the standby database
Fast-Start Failover: DISABLED
The configuration status:
SUCCESS
DGMGRL > see the detailed chip database
-Smart database
Role: PRIMARY
State of destination: TRANSPORT-WE
Occurrence (s):
Smart
Properties:
DGConnectIdentifier = "smart_dg_prim".
ObserverConnectIdentifier = "
LogXptMode = "ASYNC".
DelayMins = '0'
Binding = "optional."
MaxFailure = '0'
MaxConnections = '1'
ReopenSecs = "300"
NetTimeout = "30"
RedoCompression = "DISABLE."
LogShipping = 'ON '.
PreferredApplyInstance = "
ApplyInstanceTimeout = '0'
ApplyParallel = 'AUTO '.
StandbyFileManagement = 'AUTO '.
ArchiveLagTarget = "300"
LogArchiveMaxProcesses = "4"
LogArchiveMinSucceedDest = '1'
DbFileNameConvert = "
LogFileNameConvert = "X:\SMART\LOG1, X:\SMART\LOG1, Y:\SMART\LOG2, Y:\SMART\LOG2.
FastStartFailoverTarget = "
InconsistentProperties = "(monitor).
InconsistentLogXptProps = "(monitor).
SendQEntries = "(monitor).
LogXptStatus = "(monitor).
RecvQEntries = "(monitor).
Nom_sid = "smart."
StaticConnectIdentifier = ' (DESCRIPTION = (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST=host02) (PORT = 1599)) (CONNECT_DATA = (SERVICE_NAME = smart_DGMGRL)(INSTANCE_NAME=smart) (SERVER = DEDICATED)))'
StandbyArchiveLocation = "W:\SMART\arc\".
AlternateLocation = "
LogArchiveTrace = '8191'
LogArchiveFormat = "smart_%s_%t_%r.arc".
TopWaitEvents = "(monitor).
State of the database:
SUCCESS
DGMGRL > see the detailed database smart_stb
Database - smart_stb
Role: STANDBY PHYSICS
State of destination: apply
Transport Lag: 0 seconds
Apply the Lag: 0 seconds
Real-time query: OFF
Occurrence (s):
Smart
Properties:
DGConnectIdentifier = "smart_dg_stb".
ObserverConnectIdentifier = "
LogXptMode = "ASYNC".
DelayMins = '0'
Binding = "optional."
MaxFailure = '0'
MaxConnections = '1'
ReopenSecs = "300"
NetTimeout = "30"
RedoCompression = "DISABLE."
LogShipping = 'ON '.
PreferredApplyInstance = "
ApplyInstanceTimeout = '0'
ApplyParallel = 'AUTO '.
StandbyFileManagement = 'AUTO '.
ArchiveLagTarget = "300"
LogArchiveMaxProcesses = "4"
LogArchiveMinSucceedDest = '1'
DbFileNameConvert = "
LogFileNameConvert = "X:\SMART\LOG1, X:\SMART\LOG1, Y:\SMART\LOG2, Y:\SMART\LOG2.
FastStartFailoverTarget = "
InconsistentProperties = "(monitor).
InconsistentLogXptProps = "(monitor).
SendQEntries = "(monitor).
LogXptStatus = "(monitor).
RecvQEntries = "(monitor).
Nom_sid = "smart."
StaticConnectIdentifier = ' (DESCRIPTION = (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST=host01) (PORT = 1599)) (CONNECT_DATA = (SERVICE_NAME = smart_stb_DGMGRL)(INSTANCE_NAME=smart) (SERVER = DEDICATED)))'
StandbyArchiveLocation = "W:\SMART\arc\".
AlternateLocation = "
LogArchiveTrace = '8191'
LogArchiveFormat = "smart_%s_%t_%r.arc".
TopWaitEvents = "(monitor).
State of the database:
SUCCESS
tnsnames.ora:
smart_dg_stb = (Description = (Address = (Protocol = TCP)(Host=host01) (port = 1599)) (CONNECT_DATA = (Server = Dedicated) (SID = Smart)))
smart_dg_prim = (Description = (Address = (Protocol = TCP)(Host=host02) (port = 1599)) (CONNECT_DATA = (Server = Dedicated) (SID = Smart)))
Primary listner.ora:
LISTENER_REDO_SMART =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP (PORT = 1599))(HOST = host02))
)
)
SID_LIST_LISTENER_REDO_SMART =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = CLRExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\11.2.0)
(= Extproc PROGRAM)
(ENVS = "EXTPROC_DLLS=ONLY:D:\oracle\11.2.0\bin\oraclr11.dll")
)
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = smart)
(ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\11.2.0)
)
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = smart)
(GLOBAL_DBNAME = smart_DGMGRL)
(ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\11.2.0)
)
)
Listener.ora ensures
LISTENER_REDO_SMART =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP (PORT = 1599))(HOST = host01))
)
)
SID_LIST_LISTENER_REDO_SMART =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = CLRExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\11.2.0)
(= Extproc PROGRAM)
(ENVS = "EXTPROC_DLLS=ONLY:D:\oracle\11.2.0\bin\oraclr11.dll")
)
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = smart)
(ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\11.2.0)
)
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = smart)
(GLOBAL_DBNAME = smart_stb_DGMGRL)
(ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\11.2.0)
)
)
LSNRCTL > status listener_redo_smart
Connection to (DESCRIPTION = (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP (PORT = 1599))(HOST=host02)))
STATUS of the LISTENER
------------------------
Alias LISTENER_REDO_SMART
TNSLSNR for Windows 64-bit version: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
Start date August 30, 2014 20:46:12
Uptime 10 days 13 h 11 min 15 sec
Draw level off
Security ON: OS Local Authentication
SNMP OFF
Listener parameter File D:\oracle\11.2.0\network\admin\listener.ora
Listener log file D:\oracle\diag\tnslsnr\host02\listener_redo_smart\alert\log.xml
Summary of endpoints listening...
(DESCRIPTION = (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = tcp (PORT = 1599))(HOST=host02)))
Summary of services...
Service 'CLRExtProc' has 1 instance (s).
Instance of 'CLRExtProc', status UNKNOWN, has 1 operation for this service...
Service 'HA_SMART' has 1 instance (s).
'Smart' instance, State LOAN, has 1 operation for this service...
'Smart' service has 2 occurrences.
'Smart' instance, status UNKNOWN, has 1 operation for this service...
'Smart' instance, State LOAN, has 1 operation for this service...
Service 'smart_DGB' has 1 instance (s).
'Smart' instance, State LOAN, has 1 operation for this service...
Service 'smart_DGMGRL' has 1 instance (s).
'Smart' instance, status UNKNOWN, has 1 operation for this service...
The command completed successfully
I would be most grateful if someone would have an idea of how solve it!
Thanks in advance and best regards...

Solved!

A logon trigger that makes an insert in a table for each log in the appearance of this behavior. Since dataguard brings the standby database open mode ReadOnly cannot insert the trigger and the strange behavior as described happens!

Hope that could help someone in the future...

Kind regards

The loop ForEach with If / ElseIf failling

Hoping someone could point out what im doing here wrong.

$VMServers = @("Server01", "Server02", "Server03", "Server04", "Server05", "Server06", "Server07", "Server08", "Server09", "Server10", "Server11", "Server12", "Server13", "Server14", "Server15", "Server16", "Server17", "Server18")


foreach($VM in $VMServers) {
  Write-Host "Server Name in Loop is "$VM
  notepadIF ($VM = "Server01") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "DB Server SAP Node 1"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server02") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "DB Server SAP Node 2"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server03") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "DB Server SAP Node 3"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server04") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "DB Server SAP Node 4"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server05") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "HCP (CRM) Central Instance"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server06") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "HCP (CRM) App Server 1"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server07") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "HCP (CRM) App Server 1"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server08") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "HJP (ADS + BW Portal) "}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server09") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "HGP (GW)"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server10") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "HLP (Livecache)"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server11") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "HXP (PI)"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server12") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "HOP (BOE)"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server13") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "Arezzo DB Node 1 (& IIS)"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server14") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "Arezzo DB Node 2 (& IIS)"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server15") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "OpenText Archive"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server16") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "OpenText Content"}
  ElseIF ($VM = "Server17") {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "OpenText Admin"}
  Else {
  Set-Annotation $VM -CustomAttribute "01 - System Role" -Value "HBP (BW)"}
}

What I thought should be pretty self-explanatory, that loop to control the name of the server in the variable and depending on what server name, returns the correct description.

However, the output shows that, on each loop, he still thinks the variable = Server1, which we know is not true the output of write-host.

In the loop server name is server01

AnnotatedEntity name value

--------------- ---- -----

SERVER01 01 - node system role DB Server SAP 1

In the loop server name is server01

SERVER01 01 - node system role DB Server SAP 1

Name of the server in the loop is Server02

SERVER01 01 - node system role DB Server SAP 1

Name of the server in the loop is Server03

Grateful if anyone could tell em what im doing here who won't.

Thanks in advance!

Replacing the '=' sign in

$VM = "ServerXX".

with

$VM - eq "ServerXX".

should work.

André

4EA3 monitor Sessions explain plan fails with ORA - 00904 SP. CHILD_ADDRESS is not a valid identifier.

I'm running 64 Bit Windows JDK 7 connecting to Oracle DB 10.1.0.5.0. Access the Plan to explain in the tool monitor Sessions tab causes the error. This has been true in all 4. releases.

Copy of the report of sessions monitor down to a user defined report, check out the SQL used in the Plan to explain tab and try to run in your 10.1.0.5 database. We do not support this version of the database, but you can change to the sql in your report defined by the user to work for this instance if necessary.

Oracle 11g upgrade in AIX 6.1 with HACMP
Hi friends,

As I have two Power servers in AIX 6.1 with oracle 10g in HACMP in which SAP application runs.

That is independent of database and other Central Instance.

I did 11g successfully upgrades in my DEV and QAS servers which are nonclustered environment.

Now I want to upgrade even in PRD tends in HACMP.

Let me know what are the areas should I focus especially on the servers in cluster environment.

Thank you

Hari
I'm still not sure what you mean by a DB server and a CI server.

In a configuration HACMP, 2 node, Id expect to see something like

/ U01 hosts ORACLE_HOME locally on each node
/u04...etc/u03/U02 are HA mounts you will see on the active node. In your case I suppose that its all the materials for lv, but if that's true you also put your ORACLE_HOME to be a point of mounting HA

>
..
/ dev/lv_pip_64 10.00 18988 5.73 43% 2% / oracle/PIP/102_64
..
>

on your passive node, compare the mount points and itll be clearer. If you have your Oracle_home to be as much a mount HA, Id be careful with who you are, then past to the operating system with host names on install. But anyone who installed it would be tested failover (you hope) leaves thus temporarily assumes its ok. It's easier then on you that you only 1 upgrade to do and that is on the mounted oracle_home.

How to implement the CAWC & PS in R12.1.3?
Dear all,

Please let me know the steps in details of implementation of the CPSA and Psalm
My environment is as below to take only one PC.

Oracle Applications: 12.1.3
RDBMS: 11.1.0.7.0
OS: OEL5

Thank you
Concerning
GSM
The form of proceedings must always have a line input, even when the source and ASIC are on the same centralized instance.

On the line as you enter, you should let the db link fields null to indicate that this source that you declare in the planning lies in the same instance and must not be accessible using the links to the db.

Are all instances of svchost.exe in Windows XP necessary?

Windows XP (sp3), the instances of svchost.exe 7 boot are started, are all necessary?

Windows XP (sp3), the instances of svchost.exe 7 boot are started, are all necessary?

Yes. Read here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314056

Application of the rules to Instances of entity in a sequence (multiple calls necessary?)
Hello

In my OPA team, we have a situation in which it would be useful to be able to run a series of calculations on a set of instances sequentially. We wonder if there is an acceptable method for this in a single call to a modules, because the OPA does not allow a loop or a sequential processing of data in a way that seems obvious.

Context:
Consider a situation involving a computation that can be performed on a single Bill, but we have a series of bills to deal with. For example, let's say that there are a certain amount of a deduction or "co-payments" that must be subtracted from the large bills, but is deducted in greater quantity of invoices received earlier (rather than be distributed also among them) and then will deplete fairly once was subtracted in all. In this case, it is not sufficient to use a statement of the type «for each of the Bills...» "because the conditions for the calculation have to change with each invoice. This seems to require the ability to browse an ordered list, but we do not know if something like this is possible (without violating an axiom or advised).

Ideas:
The best idea we could come to would be to use a time stamp to identify the Bill earlier as a starting point and then use the function of 'unknown' to force the rules to calculate the deduction for 'other' more former Bill in sequence. The current solution will be to call several times modules by an external script that loops through the Bills.

To sum up, we wonder whether there is an acceptable approach to apply a set of rules to an entity instance before to apply the same rules to others, without requiring multiple calls for modules.

Thank you!
-Patrick

Published by: Patrick guess on July 6, 2011 19:11
You started down the right path. To quickly answer questions, there is no need for multiple calls to the basis of rules, no for ranking explicit rules or data.

The challenge when using unordered rules / systems of determinations is out procedural thinking (that loops or sequencing data explicit is required). The solution is by expressing the declarative logic equivalent (which requires no sequence with the right answer). In this case, consider the calculation from the perspective of one invoice at a time and write the rules that express properly how much to pay, what is the quota, etc. For the batch processing where running tallies are needed, there is something practical for use in the rule based systems - conclude the subtotal per each item being counted (for example, remaining annual quota through each invoice). This approach allows the declarative rules which "defined" the method calculate the score by a Bill, so that the following invoices can use the score of previous bills. Unfortunately, the description abstract approach always sounds more confused, so here is an example of rule of pseudocode that can communicate the key elements of the approach...

Assume:
Bills have numbers (or dates/hours) which can be used to conclude an absolute order for all bills (we will use Bill in ordering them in this example)
Remaining annual quota of the person is the initial amount of copay remaining before the current batch of invoices is treated
Each invoice must include a co-payment of $50 (for simplicity, although this could be concluded by rules and vary based on the services provided, etc.)
Assume all bills are more than the share (again to simplify this example, this could be dealt with in the rules of both conditions)
The main objectives of the basis of rules are to determine the share of each invoice and the balance sheet of the share of the person (i.e. copay they may still have to pay this year) after treats a batch of invoices.

Pseudo rules to get the general concept:

Set the order in which the bills need to be addressed...
-The Bill (prior Bill) is a member of previous invoices of the invoice if the s prior invoice ID< the="" invoice's="">
-The Bill (later Bill) is a member of the subsequent invoices of the invoice if the invoice later s ID > ID of the invoice
-The Bill (Bill immediately preceding) is a member of if immediately before invoice
the immediately previous invoice is a member, if the prior Bill of Bill AND
the number of previous invoices of the invoice with ID > ID of the invoice immediately before = 0

To conclude the first remaining share of each invoice... put them in a table of rules, so they can conclude the same attribute but use different logical formulas
-Initial remaining Copay of the invoice = remaining share of the person if the number of the invoice is immediately previous bills is 0 (i.e. the first Bill in the batch)
-Initial remaining Copay of the invoice = share of remaining final invoice of the immediately previous invoice (i.e. each ' initial rest copay "is the same that the invoice immediately before the 'final remaining copay)

A table is used to define how much share for each invoice - two possible scenarios...
-Share of the invoice = $50 if the original invoice remaining share > = $50
-Share of the Bill remaining share = original invoice if the original invoice remaining quota<>

A rule to determine the final remaining share of each invoice (i.e. after subtracting the share upward through this invoice of the annual overall amount of the person)
-Copay remaining final invoice = remaining share original of the invoice - share of the Bill

A rule to determine the person remains final share (i.e. After all invoices in this batch have been processed)
-remaining share final person = final remaining share of the Bill if later the invoice s County bills = 0 (i.e. the final copay remaining of the 'last' Bill in the batch)

Note that some attributes and relationships above are not absolutely necessary (i.e., it is not necessary to postpone the two remaining original co-pay and determine a final remaining share by invoice, but it retains the logic of each a little more simple rule).

Hope that helps...

To connect two different database instance, what configuration in web cleint is necessary?

Hi all
We had two P6 database instance as a DEV and PROD
We want to configure the web client so that the user can select either DEV or PROD according to the requirement by the same URL.
Can you please tell me what I need to do in the web to work with two DB instance client?

Normally, changes are reflected without bouncing the middle tier (weblogic Server). If t is not then rebound / restart the server managed by admin / when P6 application is deployed.

Kind regards

Sachin Gupta

Group of patches to update for each Instance necessary? Urgent!
Dear experts!

I'm running a server with v.10.2.0.1.0 and 4 instances of database Oracle. Today, I installed the update of the Group of fixes for the version 10.2.0.5.0.
After the runInstaller routine ended, I connected to one of these cases and ran the catupgr.sql followed by the utlrp.sql script.

My question is if I need to run these scripts for each separately to the upgraded instance of the schemas sys and system to v.10.2.0.5.0?

It is really urgent, because I have to get back to work tomorrow. Systems need to run Monday.

I appreciate your help! Thank you very much in advance for clarifying the steps! I ' ill keep you updated on how things are going!

Best regards

SEB
skahlert wrote:
Dear experts!

I'm running a server with v.10.2.0.1.0 and 4 instances of database Oracle. Today, I installed the update of the Group of fixes for the version 10.2.0.5.0.
After the runInstaller routine ended, I connected to one of these cases and ran the catupgr.sql followed by the utlrp.sql script.

My question is if I need to run these scripts for each separately to the upgraded instance of the schemas sys and system to v.10.2.0.5.0?

Yes, you will need to run scripts on each database that uses this ORACLE_HOME. The steps are described in the README file to 10.2.0.5 patch.

It is really urgent, because I have to get back to work tomorrow. Systems need to run Monday.

I appreciate your help! Thank you very much in advance for clarifying the steps! I ' ill keep you updated on how things are going!

Best regards

SEB

HTH
Srini

Necessary to allow rights of properly to an instance of Oracle SQL Developer
Hello everyone,

I'm trying to get our Oracle DBA to allow the use of the SQL Developer to connect to our Oracle database. I'm looking for specifics related to allowing an APEX developer to connect to the server to perform certain tasks. I looked for a 'how to' in terms of having done this, but I have not found a 'hand holding' description of the steps required to accomplish this task.

Can someone point me to a resource that I could use to achieve this?

Thank you

Charles
Charles:

What are the tasks must be done on the server?
Can you not perform these tasks of SqlWorkshop?
If you already have a workspace defined APEX, you should be able to connect to the Oracle via SqlDeveloper database using the schema of analysis of your worspace APEX and its password.

CITY

Multiple instances of firefox in the Manager of tasks but FF does not open

-Windows XP SP3 (updated with all critical updates)
-FireFox 25.0.1 (Note: originally, I had version 31, but there are a few days that has stopped working)
-Norton Security Suite (version of comcast) up to date
-J' have IE6 and Chrome 37 like browsers (Note: FF stopped working, IE8 had also ceased to operate-page would open, only one system process, but the page would never load)

A ran the following tests:
-SUPERAntiSpyware Free Edition
-Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
-Ad-Aware Antivirus
-Spybot-S & D Start Center

Found some non-critical infections still possible (nothing too crazy)
Symptom persists as follows:
-cool computer boot
-Open task (no case of FF) Manager
-Open firefox - process appears in Task Manager and it goes immediately to 50%
(Nothing opens and nothing listed in the Applications)
-Open a second instance of firefox - 2nd process appears in Task Manager
(still nothing opens and no instance appears in the Applications
(two instances continue to operate the CPU usage - a 15% and the other running at 35% - at a 50% YTD or both can be executed at 25% each)
-opening a third instance of firefox
(still nothing opens, and three bodies show in the Task Manager process and cumulatively race to 50% - example: 15 + 15 + 20 or 10 + 15 + 25)

Troubleshooting:
restored a picture disc from may 2014
-Note: Dec 2013, I had made a complete NEW installation new Windows XP being drafted for EOL and installed all updates, including SP3, so that the image I have chosen to may was 5 months old, but I chose this one because of some other programs I had installed this month and didn't want to go through this again
(- Note #2: I disk image, make a monthly PQI backup of my C: drive and my drive R :) I have two hard drives 300 G each, while C: drive is OS only and drive a: all my downloads, my documents, my pictures, etc.)

-After the restored image, I tried to open FF and IE8, neither app was problematic. FF auto update version, I don't know, but it was on 31 when I realized that the problem was BACK. Had a few critical updates to WIN, and IE8 does too!

uninstalled IE8 (restored to IE6, and now IE work - but obviously I can not live with IE6 - only necessary update!) uninstalled FF31 (and deleted all temp files and the profile of the account) and installed a copy of FF25 Neuve - while I immediately force autoupdater shut down and removed the update files, so I could stay on FF25.

Now FF25 will only open on the second instance of the process (the first will always be 50% of the CPU, the second will open and run between 0 and 10 CPU and application in the Applications)
-J' learned that I can kill the process by 50% using the the Task Manager or process explore and total CPU usage will be reduced down to 0% - 10%

I can open a lot of tabs with no problems and I can right click on a link to open a new window and everything is good, BUT if I use the ICON on the desktop, quick launch ICON or the START > programs > icon, then the NEXT process will increase to 50% and no second window opens

I've seen dozens of forums that have reported similar memory problems, but none has been resolved.

Can you help me? I don't want to upgrade from IE6 to IE8 right now, but I won't use it for anything but stable until I can upgrade. Note: in addition to being very slow, I was move to Chrome, but I never liked Chrome... I use FF right now to ask for help.

Any suggestions?

I followed donaldmaloney suggestion and it works now. Here's how I did it:
-uninstalled all instances of N360
-restarted,
-remove all the remaining files from the initial installation,
-restarted again
-reinstalled N360
-a ran Live Update several times and restarted
-repeated Live Update until no more updates to date are available

And now I can open the IE and FF.
Save yourself the time, stop working with Norton support staff, but BRAVO to them to understand their product to the root of the problem and they do not include a fix for the problem, but uninstall/reinstall was the only way to allow the difficulty of working. Great work!

Detective Conan!

Central instance is necessary

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for