Columns of the nested Table and ADF BC 11.1.2

I think coming to a new conception of the application, including a redesign of the database. In this application, there are users who cannot change tables of production directly, but their amendments must be approved (and possibly modified) before applying them to production tables. The production tables are part of an existing system and are fairly well standardized, with a main table and several paintings of detail.

So for the new design, I want to have a table intermediate, mirrored in the main table, where the user's changes are stored until they are approved and applied to the production tables. The intermediate table contains some additional columns for the user "add, change or delete", who supported the change, the date modified is requested. After you apply the change, the intermediate folder must be copied in a historic change and deleted from the staging table. In this way, the intermediate table is never a lot of data in it.

Here's the question:
I need to treat the tables in detail. I could have staged versions of each table in detail, but I thought it might be easier to manage if detail tables have been included in table nested table columns main staging area. Most of the detail tables contain only a few rows with rank of master. But ADF BC 11.1.2 can treat the nested table columns? Is it easy to use in an application?

Hello

and ADF Faces does support nested tables? lol so even if ADF BC would be, where would you go with this approach? Polymorphic views would be an option (think hard)?

Frank

Tags: Java

Similar Questions

How to assign values to the nested table and passes as a parameter for the procedure?
How to assign values to the nested table and passes as a parameter for the procedure?

Here are the object and its type

create or replace type test_object1 as an object
(
val1 varchar2 (50).
val2 varchar2 (50).
VARCHAR2 (50) val3
);

create or replace type test_type1 is table of the test_object1;

create or replace type test_object2 as an object
(
val1 varchar2 (50).
val2 varchar2 (50).
VARCHAR2 (50) val3
);

create or replace type test_type2 is table of the test_object2;

GRANT ALL ON test_object1 to PUBLIC;

GRANT ALL ON test_type1 to PUBLIC;

GRANT ALL ON test_object2 to PUBLIC;

GRANT ALL ON test_type2 to PUBLIC;

Here is the table object type:

create the table test_object_tpe
(
sl_num NUMBER,
Description VARCHAR2 (100),
main_val1 test_type1,
main_val2 test_type2
)

NESTED TABLE main_val1 STORE AS tot1
NESTED TABLE main_val2 STORE AS earlier2;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is the procedure that inserts values into the nested table:

PROCEDURE INSERT_TEST_DATA (sl_num in NUMBER,
Description in VARCHAR2,
p_main_val1 IN test_type1,
p_main_val2 IN test_type2
)
IS
BEGIN

FOR rec in p_main_val1.first... p_main_val1. Last
LOOP

INSERT INTO xxdl.test_object_tpe
(
sl_num,
Description,
main_val1,
main_val2
)
VALUES
(
sl_num
description
test_type1 (test_object1)
p_main_val1 .val1 (CRE),
p_main_val1 .val2 (CRE),
p_main_val1 .val3 (rec)
)
)
test_type2 (test_object2 (p_main_val2 .val1 (CRE),
p_main_val2 .val2 (CRE),
p_main_val2 .val3 (rec)
)
)

);

END LOOP;

commit;

END INSERT_TEST_DATA;

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here are the block anonymoys what values attributed to the object type and pass values in the procedure:

Set serveroutput on;

declare

p_sl_num NUMBER: = 1001;
p_description VARCHAR2 (50): = 'Test Val1;

inval1 test_type1: = test_type1();
inval2 test_type2: = test_type2();

Start

inval1 (1) .val1: = "testx1";
inval1 (1) .val2: = "testx2";
inval1 (1) .val3: = "testx3";

inval2 (1) .val1: = "testy1";
inval2 (1) .val2: = "testy2";
inval2 (1) .val3: = "testy3";

CSI_PKG. INSERT_TEST_DATA (sl_num = > p_sl_num,)
Description = > p_description,
p_main_val1 = > inval1,
p_main_val2 = > inval2
);

end;
/
Someone can correct me.

Thank you
Lavan
Thanks for posting the DOF and the sample code but whenever you post provide your Oracle version 4-digit (result of SELECT * FROM V$ VERSION).
>
How to assign values to the nested table and passes as a parameter for the procedure?
>
Well you do almost everything bad that could be hurt.

Here is the code that works to insert data into your table (the procedure is not even necessary).
```
declare
p_sl_num NUMBER := 1001;
p_description VARCHAR2(50) := 'Testing Val1';
inval1 test_type1 := test_type1();
inval2 test_type2 := test_type2();
begin
inval1.extend();
inval1(1) := test_object1('testx1', 'testx2', 'testx3');
inval2.extend();
inval2(1) := test_object2('testy1', 'testy2', 'testy3');

INSERT INTO test_object_tpe
(
sl_num,
description,
main_val1,
main_val2
)
VALUES
(p_sl_num, p_description, inval1, inval2);
commit;
end;
/
```
See example 5-15 making reference to an element of nested Table Chapter 5 using PL/SQL collections and records in the PL/SQL doc
http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/AppDev.111/b28370/Collections.htm#CJABEBEA

1. you don't even have the procedure because it is a simple INSERTION in the table you can do directly (see my above code)
```
inval1(1).val1 := 'testx1';
```
Since you have not yet created all the elements, there is no element 1 "inval1". You need EXTEND the collection to add an element
```
inval1.extend();
```
And then, there is an empty element, but "inval1" is a container for objects of type 'test_object1' not for scalars as "val1", "val2", and "val3".
If you can not do
```
inval1(1).val1 := 'testx1';
```
You must create an instance of 'test_object1 '.
```
inval1(1) := test_object1('testx1', 'testx2', 'testx3');
```
And so on for the other collection

You don't need the procedure (as my code example shows), but once you fill in the variables correctly it will work.

Difference between the nested table and an associative array

Hello
While going through the link http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/appdev.920/a96624/05_colls.htm
I came across the statement that
Nested tables can be stored in a column of data, but of associative arrays

So I tried the following statement for the associative arrays where he works

create type t_nm is table of number index by binary_integer

The t_nm of type above name is stored in USER_TYPES.

So how can we say that associative arrays can not be stored in DB.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Thank you

Published by: smile on April 8, 2011 02:42

SQL> drop type t_num;

Type dropped.

SQL> create type t_num table of number index by binary_integer;
  2  /

Warning: Type created with compilation errors.

SQL> desc t_num;
ERROR:
ORA-24372: invalid object for describe

SQL> set lines 999
SQL> select * from user_types;

TYPE_NAME                      TYPE_OID                         TYPECODE                       ATTRIBUTES
------------------------------ -------------------------------- ------------------------------ ----------
T_NUM                          57417E92AD25409CB858D339570A0F56 OBJECT                                  0 

SQL> select object_name, object_type, status from user_objects where object_name = 'T_NUM';

OBJECT_NAME                                                                                                                      OBJECT_TYPE         STATUS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- -------
T_NUM                                                                                                                            TYPE                INVALID

SQL>

You might have missed the error into a TOAD.

Concerning

REDA

Why mandatory columns of the Base tables and interface are different?
Hi guys, I support provider in PA (ap_suppliers) thanks to the Interface table (ap_suppliers_int), but my confusion is that ap_suppliers have 8 required columns, but its interface ap_suppliers_int have only 2 column.why? mandatory and also with these 2 columns also load records.

Kind regards
Shakeel khan
Yes sometimes it is and also depends on the current configuration of oracle. Some of the fields are automatically generated.

sometimes better to analyze the package to interface and then use the interface programs.

Thank you
Kiran

Insert and update the nested table

Hello

I created a nested table containing the following columns. I need to insert records into the nested table. And also I have to update the nested table. Please find below my table and get error message.

Please advose...!

SQL> create type details as object(
  2  basic number(7,2),
  3  da number(6,2),
  4  hra number(6,2),
  5  pf number(6,2),
  6  it number(6,2),
  7  gross number(7,2),
  8  ded number(6,2),
  9  net number(8,2));
 10  /

Type created.

SQL> create type details_t is table of details;
  2  /

Type created.


SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf

  1  create table emp_tab(empno number(4),name varchar2(10),details_tab details_t)
  2* nested table details_tab store as empl_details
SQL> /

Table created.


SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf

  1* insert into emp_tab values(&empno,'&name',details_t(details(&da,&hra,&pf,&it,null,null,null)))
SQL> /
Enter value for empno: 1
Enter value for name: asdf
Enter value for da: 120
Enter value for hra: 130
Enter value for pf: 120
Enter value for it: 120
old   1: insert into emp_tab values(&empno,'&name',details_t(details(&da,&hra,&pf,&it,null,null,null
new   1: insert into emp_tab values(1,'asdf',details_t(details(120,130,120,120,null,null,null)))
insert into emp_tab values(1,'asdf',details_t(details(120,130,120,120,null,null,null)))
                                             *
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02315: incorrect number of arguments for default constructor

Can I use '&' while inserting records in the nested table? Yes / No?

I do need to update also net gross, ded, columns... !!

Please help me... !!

Concerning
A

$ sqlplus scott/tiger

SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production on Thu Apr 21 16:18:16 2011

Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.

Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options

SQL> CREATE TYPE details AS OBJECT(
 basic NUMBER(7,2),
 da NUMBER(6,2),
 hra NUMBER(6,2),
 pf NUMBER(6,2),
 it NUMBER(6,2),
 gross NUMBER(7,2),
 ded NUMBER(6,2),
 net NUMBER(8,2));  2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9
 10  /

Type created.

SQL> CREATE TYPE details_t IS TABLE OF details;
  2  /

Type created.

SQL> CREATE TABLE emp_tab(empno NUMBER(4),name VARCHAR2(10),details_tab details_t)
 NESTED TABLE details_tab store as empl_details  2
  3  /

Table created.

SQL> INSERT INTO emp_tab VALUES(7001,'Saubhik',details_t(details(100,100,50,10,10,null,null,null)));

1 row created.

SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE (SELECT details_tab FROM emp_tab WHERE empno=7001);

     BASIC         DA        HRA         PF         IT      GROSS        DED
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
       NET
----------
       100        100         50         10         10

SQL> ^C

SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf

  1  UPDATE TABLE (SELECT details_tab FROM emp_tab WHERE empno=7001)
  2     emp_sal
  3*    SET emp_sal.net=emp_sal.basic+emp_sal.da+emp_sal.hra
SQL> /

1 row updated.

SQL> SELECT * FRM emp_tab;
SELECT * FRM emp_tab
         *
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected

SQL> SELECT * FROM emp_tab;

     EMPNO NAME
---------- ----------
DETAILS_TAB(BASIC, DA, HRA, PF, IT, GROSS, DED, NET)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      7001 Saubhik
DETAILS_T(DETAILS(100, 100, 50, 10, 10, NULL, NULL, 250))

SQL>

Can we have hash partition and list on 2 columns in the same table. How.
Can we have hash partition and list on 2 columns in the same table. How.

Work on 10g release 2
# List-Hash is a valid composite partitioning strategy 11 from g.

What is the preferred means of data transmission as a type of record between the nested table of pl/sql program or an associative array

What is the preferred means of data transmission in the associative array of the nested table record vs

Choose between Nested Tables and associative arrays

The two nested tables and associative arrays (formerly index - by tables) use similar index notation, but they have different characteristics when it comes to persistence and ease of passing parameters.

Nested tables can be stored in a column of data, but can of associative arrays. Nested tables can simplify the SQL operations where you would normally join a single-column table with a larger table.

Associative arrays are appropriate for relatively small lookup tables where the collection can be constructed in memory whenever a procedure is called or a package is initialized. They are good for the collection of the information volume is unknown beforehand, because there is no fixed limit on their size. Their index values are more flexible, as associative array indices can be negative, can be no sequential and can use values of string instead of numbers.

PL/SQL automatically converts between the bays of the host and the associative arrays that use values of digital keys. The most effective way to move the collections to and from the database server is to implement data values in associative arrays, and then use these associative arrays with erections in bulk (the FORALL statement or BULK COLLECT clause).

With the help of documents and Collections of PL/SQL

Read this:

How to pass the record set as a parameter of the procedure.

https://community.Oracle.com/thread/2375173?TSTART=0

Merge into the nested table

Hi all
Can I combine the records in the nested table
I have a table with 2 colum: col_1 and col_2
col_1: corresponds to the id (varchar2)
col_2: is a column nested with the type of table (sub_col_1 (number), sub_col_2 (number))

for example: I have 2 accounts table ('a', (1,2)) and ('b', (3,4)))

what I want is merged into this table with values ('a', '4.5')) + ('c', (6,7)) IN a single statement

What I should have after this operation ('a', (1,2,4,5)) + ('b', (3,4)) + ('c', (6,7)).
Can I do this?

CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEST_TYPE AS OBJECT(SUB_COL_1 NUMBER, SUB_COL_2 NUMBER) ;

CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEST_TYPE_TABLE IS TABLE OF TEST_TYPE;

CREATE TABLE TEST_MERGE_NESTED_TABLE (COL_1 VARCHAR2(1 CHAR), COL_2 TEST_TYPE_TABLE)
    NESTED TABLE COL_2 STORE AS COL_2_NESTED;
    
INSERT INTO TEST_MERGE_NESTED_TABLE VALUES('a',TEST_TYPE_TABLE(TEST_TYPE(1,2) ));
INSERT INTO TEST_MERGE_NESTED_TABLE VALUES('b',TEST_TYPE_TABLE(TEST_TYPE(3,4) ));

Oracle version: 11.2.0.3
Thank you all.

Published by: 966205 on 20:18 21/02/2013

Published by: 966205 on 20:42 21/02/2013

966205 wrote:
That means he does the same thing as what I want (adding? do not recreate this column in the physical layer).

Actually, no.
All content of the nested table is first removed (for the given FK), then the result of the MULTISET UNION is reinserted.

The evidence on:

SQL> alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 12';

Session altered.

SQL> merge into test_merge_nested_table t
  2  using (
  3    select 'a' col_1, TEST_TYPE_TABLE(TEST_TYPE(4,5)) col_2 from dual union all
  4    select 'c' , TEST_TYPE_TABLE(TEST_TYPE(6,7))            from dual
  5  ) v
  6  on ( t.col_1 = v.col_1 )
  7  when matched then update
  8    set t.col_2 = t.col_2 multiset union v.col_2
  9  when not matched then insert (col_1, col_2)
 10   values (v.col_1, v.col_2) ;

2 rows merged.

SQL> alter session set events '10046 trace name context off';

Session altered.

SQL> select * from test_merge_nested_table;

C COL_2(SUB_COL_1, SUB_COL_2)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c TEST_TYPE_TABLE(TEST_TYPE(6, 7))
a TEST_TYPE_TABLE(TEST_TYPE(1, 2), TEST_TYPE(4, 5))
b TEST_TYPE_TABLE(TEST_TYPE(3, 4))

TKPROF output:

DELETE, the nested table statement objectives associated with 'a' and deletes the line after line that it contains (1,2).
The later INSERTION is performed twice (run count = 2) and target the two nested table 'a' by inserting 2 ranks: former one (1,2) + the new one (4.5) and the nested table 'c' by inserting 1 row (6,7).

SQL ID: 6bjc2z2t53csn Plan Hash: 132214516

DELETE /*+ REF_CASCADE_CURSOR */ FROM "DEV"."COL_2_NESTED"
WHERE
 "NESTED_TABLE_ID" = :1

call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          1          3           1
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
total        2      0.00       0.00          0          1          3           1

Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: SYS   (recursive depth: 1)
Number of plan statistics captured: 1

Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max)  Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ----------  ---------------------------------------------------
         0          0          0  DELETE  COL_2_NESTED (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=44 us)
         1          1          1   INDEX RANGE SCAN SYS_FK0000023444N00002$ (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=10 us)(object id 23446)

********************************************************************************

 

********************************************************************************

SQL ID: 0fzd5yk23jyas Plan Hash: 0

INSERT /*+ NO_PARTIAL_COMMIT REF_CASCADE_CURSOR */ INTO "DEV"."COL_2_NESTED"
  ("NESTED_TABLE_ID","SYS_NC_ROWINFO$")
VALUES
(:1, :2)

call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
Parse        2      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      2      0.00       0.00          0          2         10           3
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
total        4      0.00       0.00          0          2         10           3

Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 50     (recursive depth: 1)
Number of plan statistics captured: 1

Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max)  Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ----------  ---------------------------------------------------
         0          0          0  LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL  (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=113 us)

********************************************************************************

How the nested table that is stored in the database?
How the nested table that is stored in the database?
The nested table column is stored with the table main or separate in the database?
A nested table is a table that is stored in the structure of another table. It is used to support the columns that contain multivalued attributes.

If you want to use the same type in multiple places, create them on a global scale and these will be discussed under 'Types'.

in the nested table clause
HIII

I created a nested table
There as rows and columns.
now I'm trying to retrieve the nested table data, I found this application and it works can any body tell me what that c and value (c) mean in the query below

Select value (c) of the (select cl vir where age = 22) c;
810345 wrote:
now I'm trying to retrieve the nested table data, I found this application and it works can any body tell me what that c and value (c) mean in the query below

Select value (c) of the (select cl vir where age = 22) c;

What version of Oracle are you using? THE is obsolete for ages. Use of TABLE operator. VALUE is built-in and is documented.

SY.

Trigger on the nested table - possible without sight?
I have a table my_table that has a nested table column, DOC. I need a trigger that fires whenever a row in the nested table is deleted.

I had initially hoped that a status UPDATE on my_table trigger would do the trick, but it doesn't. Then I created a trigger on the nested table.

I can make it work if I create a table view and then make the trigger through this:

"INSTEAD OF DELETE
ON the TABLE IMBRIQUEE my_view DOC
'

and then to do the removal through the view:

deletion OF TABLE
(Doc SELECT FROM my_view where rowid = 1111);

HOWEVER, I need this to work when the delete statement is directly through the table itself and not through the view. The delete statement is generated by an application that I can't control. I can only make changes to the database.

deletion OF TABLE
(Doc SELECT FROM my_table where rowid = 1111);
Create the trigger on the nested table.
```
create or replace type result_obj as object(subject varchar2(100), mark integer)
/
create or replace type result_tbl as table of result_obj
/
create table student(sno integer, sname varchar2(100), result result_tbl) nested table result store as result_tbl_tbl
/
insert into student values(10, 'Karthick', result_tbl(result_obj('English',85),result_obj('Hindi',70)))
/
insert into student values(20, 'Vimal', result_tbl(result_obj('English',75),result_obj('Hindi',90)))
/
select s.sno, s.sname,r.subject, r.mark
  from student s,
       table(s.result) r
/
create or replace trigger Result_Trigger before delete on result_tbl_tbl for each row
begin
    raise_application_error(-20001,'You cannot delete this subject');
end;
/
delete
  from
 table(select s.result
         from student s
        where s.sno = 10)
 where subject = 'Hindi'
/
```

How to fill the value in the nested table by using the object type

Hi gurus
I created an object type and able to fill the values in it, now I want to create a nested table type of this object and fill it but looks like I'm doing something wrong, see my code below.
Code example
CREATE or REPLACE TYPE countries_o
AS
OBJECT
(
COUNTRY_ID TANK (2 BYTES),
COUNTRY_NAME VARCHAR2 (40 BYTE),
REGION_ID NUMBER);
/
create or replace type countries_t is table of the countries_o;

/
CREATE OR REPLACE
ABC of the PROCEDURE
IS
v_print countries_t; -: = arr_countries_t('01','Aus',1);
BEGIN
v_print: = countries_t('01','A',11);
DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (v_print. COUNTRY_ID | v_print. COUNTRY_NAME | v_print. REGION_ID);
END;
/
Error
- Error (6.3): PL/SQL: statement ignored
- Error (6,12): PLS-00306: wrong number or types of arguments in the call to 'COUNTRIES_T '.
- Error (7.3): PL/SQL: statement ignored
- Error (7.32): PLS-00302: component 'COUNTRY_ID' must be declared
Thanks in advance
Concerning
Muzz

Hi user,

Here is another method that you can try-

CREATE OR REPLACE

ABC of the PROCEDURE

IS

v_print countries_t: = countries_t (countries_o('01','A',11));

BEGIN

DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (v_print (1).) COUNTRY_ID | v_print (1). COUNTRY_NAME | v_print (1). REGION_ID); -you're accessinf the first element of the nested table, which in turn points to the object.

END;

In the sections of the declaration you have assigned values to the nested table.

Kind regards
Maxou

Make a column based on another value of the column in the same table

JDev 11.1.1.6.0

It may be a silly question but I'm stuck

I need to conditionally return a column that said Condition is as if the value in the other column of the same table B is equal to F. I should make A column only when this condition is met. I tried the following code:

	< af:column sortProperty = "PhoneNumber1."
	sortable = "false".
	headerText = "#{bindings." A.hints.PhoneNumber1.label}.
	ID = "c146.
	rendering = "#{rank." PhoneNumber1ResponseFlag eq 'F'} ">"
	< af:outputText value = "#{rank." PhoneNumber1}.
	ID = "ot130" / >
	< / af:column >
	< af:column sortProperty = "PhoneNumber1ResponseFlag."
	sortable = "false".
	headerText = "#{bindings." B.hints.PhoneNumber1ResponseFlag.label}.
	ID = "c80" rendered = "true" >
	< af:outputText value = "#{rank." PhoneNumber1ResponseFlag}.
	ID = "ot129" / >
	< / af:column >

The data presented in the table for the PhoneNumber1ResponseFlag column are F. Still my condition does not work.

Well, I've finally sorted it myself by managed bean.

Here are the steps I followed:

Wrote a new bean managed.
Added a Boolean variable called flag and made to true when the "'PhoneNumber1ResponseFlag ' current line attribute is equal to F."
Changing the property made column on this indicator.

Question: Is foreign key references to a different column in the same table

Hello
I'm not grasp this concept. Would you be able to provide the logic how and why you need to create a foreign key that references a column of the same table?
For example, referencing the schema, SupervisorNo @ here is a FOREIGN KEY to the "EmpNo" column in the same table.
EMPLOYEE (EmpNo, title, Fname, Lname, phone, Email, date of birth, sex, salary, HireDate, OutNo, SupervisorNo @)

Why would you want to do this and how can it be used? If you are filling out the data in the table, and this constraint is enabled, you will not be able to load whatever it is because the "EmpNo" column will be empty.

Any input you can provide me with this would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

His name

Self-referential integrity constraints

Lets say that we have the table emp with emp_no and mgr_no columns.

Now all managers should also be an employee too. How can I check this when inserting data into this table? I applied auto integrity constraint. It would help me to make sure no handler (doesn't mean no mgr_no) must be registered if this Manager is not an employee of this organization. Which means, I won't be able to enter any mgr_no in the column until and unless that the same employee also is an employee (emp_no from the same table).

Check the link as well below.

Data integrity

Thank you

Ishan

support_db not here column in the fnd_nodes table

Hello
today I have clone of 11.5.9 instance and face under question.
Update s_tnsmode to 'generateTNS '.
UpdateContext came out with status: 0
AC-50480: internal error: java.lang.Exception: error during the generation of the l
istener.ora.
Error generation tnsnames.ora database, temperory tnsnames.ora will be
generated using models
Instantiating tools tnsnames.ora
Tools tnsnames.ora instantiated
Tnsnames.ora Web instantiated
adgentns.pl out with status 2
CODE OF ERROR = 2 ERRORCODE_END
.end std out.
but as per below, I solved the problem
Sqlplus apps...
SQL > EXEC FND_CONC_CLONE. SETUP_CLEAN;
COMMIT;
EXIT;
Run AutoConfig on all levels, first on the DB layers, and then the APPS, to recharge the necessary system tables.
But I noticed it is not support_db of the column in the fnd_nodes table, is this a normal behavior in 11.5.9?
Please share your ideas
Thank you
Shaik

Shaik,

Yes, it's normal.

This article was introduced in 11i. FND. H (11.5.10 and above).

Thank you

Hussein

Columns of the nested Table and ADF BC 11.1.2

Similar Questions

Choose between Nested Tables and associative arrays

Self-referential integrity constraints

Maybe you are looking for