comparisons of condition

Similar Questions

• Range of comparison equal? Does not

  I have an equal comparison as condition for a while loop. I probed the sons and they are equal, but the output is false and the loop continues to run. I tried to convert a wire to the other snacks than a problem (one being a digital and the other a digital signed) was still not working. Help, please?

  The equal function will work as long as you're not doing something stupid like compare numbers in floating point. If you are, you should do a search on this extremely well discussed topic.

• Timed condition (comparison timed)

  Hello, just wanted to ask a simple way to make a timed condition.  To be brief, I have a value which I want it to be greater than zero for 'x' seconds.  If this value is greater than zero for the seconds 'x', a 'real' Boolean value would turn an led on.  However, if during these 'x' seconds, the value is equal to or less than zero, even for one second, then the light should stay off or its value "false".

  Is there a simple way to make a timed comparison?  Thanks a lot for reading and post your suggestions.

  Best,

  Nestor

  Nestor,

  Set all the values acquired during the seconds 'x' in a table. Use the Array Min Max function.  If min< 0,="" then="">

  Lynn

• Comparison of the conditional formatting to another column

  All,
  
  I wonder if there is a way to compare to another column in the comparison of the conditional formatting? I have two columns, one which is the original value and another which is a return entry that starts with the original value, then changes. Is it possible to compare the two in the conditional formatting, and then say so bold or in italics the original version back writing change? I tried to use SQL and the format of the column as it is on the report and it does not accept whatever it is, it says that "the value entered is not valid."
  
  Thanks in advance,
  
  Josh

  Why not add a column that performs the comparison, hide this column and to sit the formatting of the column (you want to format) on the value of the hidden column?

  Kind regards
  Stijn

• conditional error for comparison of sine waves

  Hi all

  I do a small program concerning some changes in the sine waves, and later I compare to set my status. I can't get through this error. I really want to put out as Boolean so my loop condition is attached to this release. Everyone please help

  Concerning

  Qasim

  It's called Convert Dynamic Data type and on the Express > range of Manipulation of the Signal. When you drop on the diagram to a dialog box can be displayed and giving you options regarding the type of data.

  Lynn

• Find entries with several conditions, including the comparison

  Hello

  I take the edition of I v6.2.7 a ride, I'm looking at the use case is the following. I have a "table" with about 100 k records defined by this object:

  @Entity
  public class LTROW {
  
    @PrimaryKey
      private Integer id = null;
  
      @SecondaryKey(relate=Relationship.MANY_TO_ONE)
      private Integer tableId = null;
      
      @SecondaryKey(relate = Relationship.MANY_TO_ONE)
    private String col0 = null;
      @SecondaryKey(relate = Relationship.MANY_TO_ONE)
      private String col1 = null;
      @SecondaryKey(relate = Relationship.MANY_TO_ONE)
      private String col2 = null;
      @SecondaryKey(relate = Relationship.MANY_TO_ONE)
      private String col3 = null;
      @SecondaryKey(relate = Relationship.MANY_TO_ONE)
      private String col4 = null;
      @SecondaryKey(relate = Relationship.MANY_TO_ONE)
      private String col5 = null;
      @SecondaryKey(relate = Relationship.MANY_TO_ONE)
      private String col6 = null;
      @SecondaryKey(relate = Relationship.MANY_TO_ONE)
      private String col7 = null;
      
      private String result0 = null;
      private String result1 = null;
      private String result2 = null;
      private String result3 = null;
      private String result4 = null;
  // ...
  }
  

  Typical research I must apply is: give me all the entries contained in tableId X where the value of co0 is equal to 7, 1112 exceeds the value of col1 and col2 value is less than 8.

  I got in the definition of index for all columns defined in the class, but can't seem to understand how to combine these criteria. I looked at EntityJoin but it doesn't seem to be what I'm looking for.

  Thank you!

  You cannot use multiple indexes for this kind of query. Instead, create and use a single index for one of the conditions and filter on other conditions. I hear, by 'filter' select the records you want using an 'if' statement Try to choose the index that returns the smallest number of records.

  See:

  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/database/database-technologies/BerkeleyDB/performing.PDF

  -mark

• Problem of numerical comparison conditional Action

  I read the long blog of Rod Ward on conditional actions in Captivate, which seems to tell me if I have a user with a numeric variable and I'm comparing it with a literal value of-1 to see if they are equal, it should work fine because, as Rod, says "what is happening under the hood is that strings are first converted to digital before be assessed values.  However, it clearly doesn't.  That's what I have for the IF condition: VariableName is equal to-1.  The value of the variable declared in the Console (via a call to cpAPIInterface.getVariableValue ()) is - 1.  And yet the conditional action performs the ELSE action instead of the action of the YEW, as if he thinks that the variable, the value is - 1 is NOT equal to-1.  Captivate is certainly not lame that it can't handle the sign less on the - 1!  Anyone has an idea why it wouldn't work?

  I was waiting a bit to see if any of the other advanced/prolific contributors would be consistent with an opinion opposite to one Lilybiri expressed, but no one has.  I appreciate the offer of Lilybiri for help .  For awhile, I thought his assertion that Captivate couldn't handle

  If varname is equal to-1

  correctly.  I created a test case very simple to try to confirm, one who had nothing else going on at all to blur the.  I was surprised when it worked very well comparing a variable with-1.  Then I noticed other places in our advancement of existing shares that already rely on it working properly, and they worked as expected.  So I was banging my head against it to try to understand the real reason for a few hours it did not work and then I discovered there are TWO assets, click boxes on this slide, which enabled the AA I had been struggling with and another who had not changed but should be doing the same action as the ELSE the other action.  So basically, I discovered it wasn't a problem with the check against-1, such that it was originally, but execution of the evil AA.

  In addition, if Rod blog comment is correct ("what's happening under the hood is that strings are first converted into digital values before being evaluated"), it SHOULD work perfectly to compare negative numbers.  And it looks good now.

• Under certain conditions, update a table based on the comparison with a SQL statement

  I have a table (table 1) that has 4 columns:
  
  UID. THE NEST | VALUE1 | VALUE2
  
  I have another statement SQL (STMT) that returns the 3 columns of a few other tables:
  
  UID. THE NEST | VALUE1
  
  Now this is the condition of the way in which I want to put up-to-date TABLE1:
  
  First, to compare a pair of UID and PID of STMT with those in TABLE1,
  
  -1, for any new pair UID and PID not in TABLE1, insert a new line of STMT in TABLE1 set TABLE1. Value2 = 0 (I already did this).
  
  2, for an existing UID and PID pair in STMT and TABLE1, do:
  
  a. in TABLE1. Value2 > 0, update TABLE1. VALUE1 = STMT. VALUE1
  
  b. to TABLE1. Value2 = 0 and if TABLE1. VALUE1! = STMT. Value1, update of TABLE1. VALUE1 = STMT. Value1, otherwise nothing to do.
  
  I can't seem to come with a solution for condition 2. Any help is appreciated!

  Hello

  Here's one way:

  MERGE INTO  table1  dst
  USING          (
               SELECT  ...   -- your stmt query goes here
           )   src
  ON         (    src.uid  = dst.uid
           AND      src.pid  = dst.pid
           )
  WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE
  SET           dst.value1 = CASE
                                 WHEN   dst.value2 > 0
                      OR     (   dst.value2 = 0
                           AND dst.calue1 != src.value1
                      )
                      THEN   src.value1
                             END
  WHERE   dst.value2 > 0
  OR (    dst.value2 = 0
     AND  dst.calue1 != src.value1
     )
  ;
  

  This assumes that the combination (uid, pid) is unique in stmt. It doesn't have to be unique in table1.

  sb92075 wrote:

  -1, for any new pair UID and PID not in TABLE1, insert a new line of STMT in TABLE1 set TABLE1. Value2 = 0 (I already did this).

  FUSION could also do parts 1 and 2 together, in the same statement.

  2, for an existing UID and PID pair in STMT and TABLE1, do:

  a. in TABLE1. Value2 > 0, update TABLE1. VALUE1 = STMT. VALUE1

  b. to TABLE1. Value2 = 0 and if TABLE1. VALUE1! = STMT. Value1, update of TABLE1. VALUE1 = STMT. Value1, otherwise nothing to do.

  Why are they not simply your needs ' uid and pid that already exist in stmt and table1, if table1.value2 > = 0, then the value table1.value1 = stmt.value1 "? Are you concerned about shooting triggers unnecessarily? It has something to do with null values? The MERGE statement above does exactly what you asked, but, depending on your needs, something simpler and more efficient could do it as well.

  I hope that answers your question.
  If not, post a small example data (CREATE TABLE and only relevant columns, INSERT statements) for all of the tables involved and also publish outcomes from these data.
  If you ask on a DML statement, such as UPDATE, the sample data will be the content of the or the tables before the DML, and the results will be the State of the or the tables changed when it's all over.
  Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.
  Always tell what version of Oracle you are using.
  See the FAQ forum {message identifier: = 9360002}

  Published by: Frank Kulash, June 6, 2012 14:51

• No comparison Condition

  In the following statement why not use terms such as 'Like' or 'In' instead of 'Not '.  Honestly I skipped this part of my reading I understood implicitly given logic, I've been doing SQL for a bit, but do not include it in explicit terms.

  Thank you.

  SELECT EMPLOYE_ID, LAST_NAME, FIRST_NAME

  EMPLOYEES

  WHERE SHIP_ID = 1

  AND NOT (LAST_NAME = 'Smith' AND name = 'Al');

  What do you think of what it would say if you put

  AND LIKE (LAST_NAME = 'Smith' AND name = 'Al')

  other than making your SQL looks like a Valley girl?

• Comparison of the two strings in which the condition

  Here are the results of the error.
  
  DMS_DAILY_UPLOAD:DMS_BOARD_DETAIL_REPORT: ODS - MSG: empty Source table: 1/1
  IPS_DAILY:DETAIL_REPORT: ODS - MSG: empty Source table: 1/1
  DMS_DAILY_UPLOAD:DMS_CONTACT_DETAIL_REPORT: ODS - MSG: empty Source table: 2/1
  DMS_DAILY_UPLOAD:DMS_EMAIL_DETAIL_REPORT: ODS - MSG: empty Source table: 10/5
  DMS_DAILY:DMS_BOARD_DETAIL_REPORT: ODS - MSG: empty Source table: 1/1
  BBS_DAILY:BBS_DAILY_REPORT: ODS - MSG: empty Source table: 1/1
  
  We need to exclude the error with the combination of ('DMS_DAILY' and ' ODS - MSG: empty Source table '.) according to the results. So, no record will come with DMS_DAILY' and ' ODS - MSG: empty Source table ' combination but with ODS - MSG error with other DMS_DAILY should pick up in the result. This is the expected result.
  
  Result must be
  IPS_DAILY:DETAIL_REPORT: ODS - MSG: empty Source table: 1/1
  BBS_DAILY:BBS_DAILY_REPORT: ODS - MSG: empty Source table: 1/1
  
  Help, please
  Thanks in advance
  Deba

  No, code does not work.

  He does.
  Have you tried it?

  It is in fact these line shich has ' ODS - MSG: empty Source table ' but do not have "DMS_DAILY."

  N °
  He keeps the lines containing not of "DMS_DAILY", or containing not "ODS - Msg. That means a line that contains both is not selected.

  It is perhaps more understandable in this way:

  where not(
         error_result like '%DMS\_DAILY%' escape '\'
     and error_result like '%ODS-MSG: Source table empty%'
     )
  

  NOT (A AND B) is equivalent to: NOT (A) or (B) NOT

• Numbers: Conditional formatting

  I am familiar with Excel, as with numbers. I try to use the conditional formatting in numbers, and it seems that less well implemented? Maybe someone can explain to me how this could work? To the point, I can't get a cell that shows the result of a formula to work in conditional formatting. Can't select areas of cells and to combine the formatting as it is on a single cell value compared and not a relative comparison to a cell in the same way, if I dragged a formula from cell to cell (it would fill the formula compared to all the cells in the new area drag out).

  I am trying to compare two columns. If the results in cell A2 are the same as in cell B2 and then, there is no additional formatting. If on the other hand, cells A2 and B2 are not equal, then the formatting should make the text in cell B2 red. Once I get this done properly then I also want to apply to the rest of the cells in the two columns.

  It does not work. The problem seems to be this column B is the result of a calculation and therefore cannot be read in the formula of conditional highlight? This is meaningless at all that it was designed that way. As I looked at length before this announcement, some talk of adding a third cell, but as the value that I need is to be calculated, I don't see how this is supposed to work - even in a workaround?

  It is a project where I get a handle on an open account that got away from me. I compare the monthly interest charges of banks in column A with the result of my formula in column B, which allows to calculate what should be the interest, according to the formula provided clean banks. These two cells must match exactly, and when it is off, I want to note. That's why once that I operate in two cells, I want to apply to the results in two columns. But even once, it seems no way to do this?

  musicoflove wrote:

  I am trying to compare two columns. If the results in cell A2 are the same as in cell B2 and then, there is no additional formatting. If on the other hand, cells A2 and B2 are not equal, then the formatting should make the text in cell B2 red. Once I get this done properly then I also want to apply to the rest of the cells in the two columns.

  It works here:

  

  To get this A2 "lozenge" click the box-and-arrow-symbol and then click cell A1.

  

  SG

• Output system are made up of several conditions by using the If Condition

  Hello master. I want to create a system of products composed of several conditions using if conditions. The input of the system is derived from "counting" and the second entry is "O". Entry is in order. Then, the expected results are:

  If Y<= 5="" and="" count=""><= 20,="" the="" result="" is="">
  If Y<= 5="" and="" 20=""><30 result="">
  If Y = outcome 30 C <= 5="" and="" count="">

  If <= 5="" y="">= 10 and County<= 20,="" the="" result="" is="">
  If <= 5="" y="">= 10 and 20<30 result="">
  If <= 5="" y="">= 10 and County > = result 30 C

  Thank you for your attention.

  Kind regards

  Fajar

  Assuming that 'A', 'B' and 'C' are digital issued by a calculation, you can use a node of the formula.

  Here is a small example based on your rating (a bit confusing).  It can be slightly changed, but it might be a starting point (assuming I understood you, and you're only dealing with the numeric data types simple as described in your example).

  

  The case could just to do this using regular functions of comparison of LabVIEW and data flow.

• Conditional formula node

  Hi guys

  I wrote a conditional code simple node formula and there is no error, but it is not calculated. It fails and when I check the code I can find no error. Please read my code and I would like to know what is the problem with my code.

  Thank you very much

  theres no error, but you used for example "if (A = 0). = is NOT a comparison operator, I think you mean "if (A == 0)" which has zero...

  Try it like this...

  Hope this helps

  Christian

• How to make a limit digital test with OR condition

  Is it possible to make a test step which is a comparison with a RC and NOT to condition?

  The code module returns a revision of PCB and the acceptable values are not States.map.

  For example, review of card must be 14, 15 or 17 but not 16.

  Stage of Custom Types are a type so they copied to any sequence file that contains one instance of them.  So when you deploy you will be fine without having to deploy all the ini files.

  You can actually just create the new stage in the movie only file and not worry do ini-files.

• Comparison of several

  Hi all

  I have 3 digital input variables. I need to check the weather, the individual variables is within a particular range. After getting confirmation or not of the 3 variables, depending on the condition that results will display a special message. There are at least 6 different cases and display messages.

  Please help me with a way to go in this.

  I can deal i structure with all outputs in it to display for different cases... but how can I give the case selector then?

  Thank you!!

  6hari9 wrote:

  but the range also changes. I'll have to use more than one 'Beach '. then for the structure of the case allows to display different messages, the entry for different cases will come from more than one "in the range"... or I'll have to use several case pickers

  Why? If feed you a table of three elements and using arrays of three elements for the lower and upper limits, you should be all set. Comparisons will be piece-by-piece. You get a Boolean outside table, one for each af comparison the three.

  If three values are scalar, built first in a table.