Converting PPT to the Captivate file size - why is is on the rise?

Similar Questions

• The Lightroom export file size: why it's so small? How can I maximize the picture quality?

  My image file size is much smaller after editing and export through Lightroom. It is impossible to maintain the size of the original file in order to preserve image quality? This small file size will have a negative impact on the prints? Any help is appreciated!

  The file size is not an indicator of picture quality! You are looking at the wrong measure.

  File size is determined by the number of pixels you have, the quality slider in the dialog box export and of a dozen other things, most of which you cannot control.

  Want to watch the number of pixels (width and height) and not the size of the file.

  It is impossible to maintain the size of the original file in order to preserve image quality?

  Not only is impossible, that it is also meaningless (see above)

  This small file size will have a negative impact on the prints?

  Instead look at the size of the file, you must look at the number of pixels of the exported photo (width and height), and this will determine if you get a decent impression. The usual standard is that you need 300 pixels per inch.

• Adobe Captivate file size

  I have a two part question. I work with Adobe Captivate for the first time, so I am of course a lot of rookie, errors, and now I'm stuck.

  I have a project that is 122 229 KB, and when publishing to LMS, is 63 900 KB. I made sure all the graphics are as small as possible, but it still takes a long time to load when you access through the LMS. My first question is, what is the size of ideal file for the publication of LMS? If necessary, I may have to divide my presentation in several modules so that they are more easily, but I'm curious to know if there is an easier way to address the issue before it split.

  My second part of the question: is there a way to tell Captivate to begin play the webinar when it loads? When I tested, it took about 2 minutes to load the file that in the world of technology online, it's an eternity. I hope there's a way to tell him to start playing the video during the rest of the presentation the loading in the background.

  Thank you in advance for your help!

  Kristen

  Hello Kristen,

  Welcome to the forums. For your last question: you can reduce the Preloader % in Preferences, project, start & end. Its default value is 100%, which means that the entire project is loaded before playing. Also: avoid having a heavy slide first, no audio action, not complicated, etc..

  There is no ideal real file size, because it depends on many factors. Keep the resolution as low as possible, I mean the size in pixels. You talk about graphics: what type of graphics do you use. If you're on the CP9, he agrees to SVG which, in most cases, have smaller file than bitmap images. But it's not only the graphics that define the size of the file: as the number of slides, images, audio and video clips.

• Huge Captivate files sizes

  I have been using Captivate to push an audio recording of a presentation in the presentation slides. The audio is in the form of a large mp3 file. When adding audio, I selects the option to split on several issues and align all the slides in the right part of the audio. If I need to change the time drag or audio (which often happens because captivate seems to be rather buggy when split the single audio track into one for each slide) the Captivate project file as a result of the rockets in the size of the file. I think it's because he keeps a copy of all audio used in Captivate, IE a copy of old and new together, mp3 stream before and after editing.
  
  If this happens a few times the file size increases accordingly and for a presentation of 50 min, I'm looking at 1.3 GB project files. These are clearly pushing my (powerful dual core, 2 GB of RAM) funds up to the limit. I tried to remove all the elements of the portion of the library, but this makes no difference to the size of the projects.
  
  To illustrate the problem to my friend, I have EVERYTHING deleted from the library, has added 1 new blank slide and deleted all other slides. This project had the air is like a brand new white. When recording (such as a new cp file) the project was infact 1.16 GB in size. Huh?
  
  Is it possible to delete the files of projects other than the library captivate?

  Yes, I am using captivate 3.0, which is where I met the problem. I tried the technique ' save, save under ", which slightly increased the size of the file. The technique of the 'new presentation, copy paste' worked for me - 1.3 GB-> 0.3 GB.

  Just open 2 instances of captivate, enjoying a nice big project at fault and the other open a new blank project. Then copy and paste all the slides of an inot the other. You may need to remove the first blank slide that was already in the empty project. Then save the new project and smiling like crazy in file size!

• Why the file size does not change when I use "Process multiple Images" to add a watermark?

  Hello

  I use 11 elements. To add a watermark to a lot of JPG photos at the same time, I use the function 'process multiple files.

  I select a source folder and a destination folder and adds a number to three numbers for each file. I do NOT check the box marked 'change photo size. After that, I set the watermark I want printed on my photos and hit OK. All files in the source folder are processed and saved with a new name in the destination folder. Loyally.

  But. The file size of the new file is strongly reduced, compared to the original. He's going from 10 MB to 500 KB (in general). Why is this? Is there a way I can help?

  Kind regards

  / Mikael Lindgren

  File size reduction is the effect of jpeg compression. In the process several files dialog, check the bottom option "convert files to the format" and choose "jpeg max quality.

• Why the same photo's file size different in Photos and in the Finder?

  I have a photo size 4608 x 3456. When I open the file information in the Apple's Photos app, it says that the file is 7.8 MB. When I open the same photo in the Finder and look at the news file, it is said that it is 3.1 MB on the disk. Why does this happen? All other metadata is the same in the pictures, Finder, Lightroom or Photoshop, but I can't understand why the file size seems to have changed since I dragged photo pictures to the Finder.

  Thank you.

  How you view the photo in the finder (you shouldn't be messing around inside the photo library)?

  If you export or drag / drop you create a new file with a different compression - using export allows you to control what

  LN

• Why the change in file size is not a difference in how I can put on a cd?

  I'm trying to burn audio files to a disc that will play in a cd player.  The size of the files is not that big.  If I just dropped everything on the disk in the form of data files, they would be easily fits on the drive with plenty of room to spare.  BUT when I go through Windows Media Player or I-Tunes to make the drive, it takes 5 discs to fit everything on.  I changed the WMA files into MP3 files, but it remains the same.  Then, I used Windows Media Player to convert the files to a file size reduced.  But it seems not to matter.  There are still 5 discs.

  There is obviously something that I don't understand the difference in burning data instead of audio files and the size of the file.  I'd appreciate any help I could get.  Thank you!

  I'm trying to burn audio files to a disc that will play in a cd player.  The size of the files is not that big.  If I just dropped everything on the disk in the form of data files, they would be easily fits on the drive with plenty of room to spare.  BUT when I go through Windows Media Player or I-Tunes to make the drive, it takes 5 discs to fit everything on.  I changed the WMA files into MP3 files, but it remains the same.  Then, I used Windows Media Player to convert the files to a file size reduced.  But it seems not to matter.  There are still 5 discs.

  There is obviously something that I don't understand the difference in burning data instead of audio files and the size of the file.  I'd appreciate any help I could get.  Thank you!

  ======================================
  If you notice on your empty CD there are two limitations...
  for example I have one here that says... 80 MIN / 700 MB...
  (this means time 'or' file size... not both)

  If you create a... Audio / music CD... (one that will play in)
  most CD players)... the limits are dictated by the duration.
  If you see the directory on an Audio CD / music you will be
  Notice the files have extensions of the ADC (this is the result
  regardless of the format of the source files).

  If you create a data CD... for example a MP3 cd which will be
  play in a player compatible with MP3 files... the limits
  are dictated by the size of the file.

  Then you have a player that is MP3... you could
  create a data CD with a lot of files unlike Audio
  CD and strictly limited by the total duration of the files.

  The following article might be worth the drive... it offers information
  on the creation of data and Audio CD.

  Burn a CD or DVD in Windows Media Player
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/burn-a-CD-or-DVD-in-Windows-Media-Player

  Volunteer - MS - MVP - Digital Media Experience J - Notice_This is not tech support_I'm volunteer - Solutions that work for me may not work for you - * proceed at your own risk *.

• Why comments in the Details pane reduce a 30 MB tiff file size to 10 MB?

  I have a scan, which is a TIFF about 30 MB and I wrote a comment in the details pane to this topic.  When I saved the comment a window pops up with a message "Application of the properties as a reference" and then the file size has dropped to about two-thirds around 10 MB.

  What Vista did to my file?  And why?

  It's my pleasure - glad I could help him.  It is very interesting to transfer the file of 23 MB to Photoshop in Photoshop showing the original 86MB (which suggests that nothing actually happened to the file - it is just how Vista reports its size that seems to be wrong).  Maybe you've found a bug in the system - it wouldn't be the first.  It seems to me that you must ignore Vista file size reporting and information from Photoshop or any other programs that you use to work with images and TIFF files (not exactly the best location, but perhaps the only one available).

  If you want to pursue this, I would say the pictures and video Forum at: http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vistapictures/threads where people who specialize in issues of picture will be more than happy to help you with your concerns.

  Thanks for the comments.

  Good luck! Lorien - MCSA/MCSE/network + / has + - if this post solves your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' button at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

• Why using the typewriter in acrobat 9 adds less file size that the use of the text of the comment in acrobat 11 tool?

  Why using the typewriter in acrobat 9 adds less file size that the use of the text of the comment in acrobat 11 tool?

  Two employees, one using acrobat 9 and the other uses acrobat 11. The two employees open a secure document one page 105 KB in size. Used using acrobat 9 using the typewriter tool to add comments. Document increases in volume to 137 kb. Second employee using acrobat 11 uses the comment add the text tool (since it is no longer a typewriter tool). This employee has to use tool once and the document immediately increases size of 105 k to 950 + kb. Why is this? What can be done to avoid this?

  As I suspected much earlier, the difference is in the fonts that are used for the text. For the smaller file, text annotation font is Times Roman. that is a policy that is essentially built into Acrobat/Reader. For the larger file, the font is Tahoma, which is not an integrated police force, which ends by happens so the entire police gets embedded in the PDF file. The size of this font on disk file is 681KO on my system (Mac), and it ends up taking more space when they are embedded in the PDF file. The same type of thing happens with form fields and this is done so that all characters in the font are available when the text is changed in a system that may not have the installed font.

  One of the problems is if you try to reduce the size of the file by changing the font that used up one of the built-in ones (Courier, Helvetica, TImes Roman), Acrobat does not remove the now unused of the file font information, if you do not get the reduction in file size that you can imagine, even if the font is no longer presented as being incorporated. I submitted this as a bug some time ago, but it has not been fixed.

• Why can't I reduce the file size of virtual disk?

  Workstation help 8.0.4, why is the file size of virtual disk for my more bigger than the amount of space used within the instance instance?

  The instance (Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit) HARD drive is 40 GB... He is currently using 28.6 GB of this space.

  But the hard for instance file is 34.5 GB size - it is more than 20% larger.

  I defragmented the drive on the instance.

  I defragmented and compacted file hard (via the 'vmware-vdiskmanager' command line utility)

  I defragmented the host drive.

  Any not really - I'm just curious as to why I can't get it down to a smaller size (mainly to speed up backups)

  Narrowing of a virtual disk is done in two steps. Unused disk space must first be cancelled in the comments, what OS, then blocks not null the hard are copied to a new file hard. With VMware Workstation 8, you can start this process in the VMware Tools window (right-click the icon in the system tray)

  André

• Why I can't use the trial to convert PDF to Microsoft Word files

  Why I can't use the trial to convert PDF to Microsoft Word files

  Hi cathiechua,

  You should definitely be able to convert PDF files to Word using Acrobat format. What happens when you choose file > save as other > Microsoft Word > Word Document?

  Best,

  Sara

• Why the reduction in file size drastic in cropped images?

  I cropped just a picture of 9 MB a very SMALL amount and the resulting image was 756 KB. Why? Is this normal?

  What are the dimensions in pixels before and after cropping? The file size is normally determined when you export a copy of the cropped image. It will depend on the settings you choose in the dialog box export for example image size, resolution and jpeg quality unless you export as PSD or by another file format which normally have larger files. In summary, that the file size is not that important as long as the image meets the requirements of your destination ex a picture with a resolution of 72 DPI to average quality compression will be fine for use on sites and blogs while you would need a resolution of 240-300 PPI and of high quality if you were doing an impression.

• Word of the file size: .docx converted in PDF format

  Hello

  I use Adobe acrobat X pro and I need to convert a Word to PDF file to join with all do us commercial offers. The file size is important in order to limit the size of the mailbox content. At the moment my Word file is 25 and it's ok, but when I convert it the result is a 120 KB PDF... I did some research in the Acrobat community and they often explain to use "Save as other", but I do not have these (maybe it came with version XI).

  I would like to know if anyone has an idea of what I can do with my version of acrobat to reduce the size of the file.

  Thank you

  Ben

  PDF Optimization is not available in Std AFAIK. However, you asked on the conversion of a WORD file. The best way to keep the size down is to NOT use save them in Adobe PDF format. Who's using PDF Maker (the Acrobat in WORD menu) which adds tags and many other things that inflate a default PDF. If you do not use this option, then use preferences to disable the tags and other elements in the file (like all bookmarks and all the rest). The easiest way is to print to the Adobe PDF printer. Don't forget to keep your simple fonts. It is better to embed fonts when you send a PDF file to others (especially from PC to MAC Linux as the fonts on the system may be different). Don't use only not the smaller file size settings. Use Std as a minimum or press options or Print embed all the fonts as subsets. The MST is fine as long as people use Acrobat or Reader for viewing, but other viewers may not recognize the basic fonts Adobe.

• Why the JPG file size decreases when Lightroom writes meta data?

  Lightroom uses the files sidecar XMP for meta data history for RAW files. When writing the metadata (e.g. tags) to JPG files, they are written directly in the header of the file. This should leave the image information in the file intact. However, the file size decreases (about 0.02 MB) when Lightroom writes metadata for the original JPG file. As far as I could see, the image information remain unchanged and no other information in the header is deleated, but why decreases the size of the file then (I expect to increase slightly or stay the same)? I work with RAW files for most but sometimes I just versions of the files to work with JPG and I don't want to lose any information.

  Thanks in advance for your answers.

  Kind regards

  me

  The number 13 in FAQ on the web site of ExifTool treats this effect:

  http://OWL.PHY.queensu.ca/~Phil/ExifTool/FAQ.html#Q13

• Why the file size is reduced when the visibility of the layer is hidden?

  With the same PSD file, I have hidden the visibility layer and recorded another copy, and I noticed that the file size is significantly reduced.

  Anyone know why?

  Thank you

  When you maximize the verified compatibility, Photoshop records a version flattened your file in the psd. When you hide the layers and save, of course, the flattened version will consist of your file psd with these missing layers. If these layers had a lot of additional information, as opposed to simply a lot of white space or easily compressible full areas, then you will see a difference in file size.