CPU does not support long mode.

Similar Questions

• Error starting data recovery - "your CPU does not support long mode.

  Hello

  When I turn on the VM data recovery, and after that he begins the boot process, it displays a message "your CPU does not support long mode. Use a 32-bit distribution"

  Data recovery is installed on an ESX 4.0 update1 then the ESX is installed on a VMware Workstation 6.5.2 as a virtual machine in my home test environment.

  My processor is a 64 bit CPU (AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-Core).

  I wonder if this message is because the ESX is running in a virtual machine on the workstation may be that it not only Duke that the processor is a 64-bit?

  Someone at - he of the idea?

  Thank you

  Marcos

  You can run the 64-bit if clients your ESX is a virtual machine. VMware Workstation does not pass through the VT extensions that are necessary for the performance of a 64-bit as VDR host.

• RH EL 4.6 64 bit-> your CPU does not support long Mode?

  Hello

  I try to create a guest RH EL Linux 4.6_64bit on a HP DL585G1 ESX3i server build 123629.

  After the start of the guest, I get only the Message: "your CPU does not support long Mode. Use a 32-bit Distribution"

  The fool is, when I boot the direkt ServerHardware with this installation of EL HR CD, the installer runs fine!

  So what is happening here?

  Any clue?

  Thank you

  Thomas

  You may need to test if:

  (a) you run a review of 'good' (in terms of supported 64-bit comments) CPU (for example, several AMD chips have been officially ranked 'not kosher' VMware because of the inadequate support of segmentation) - see http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=1901 for more details.

  (b) AMD - V / Pacifica (VT if it is an Intel CPU) is not disabled in the BIOS of the computer.

• your processor does not support long mode. use a 32-bit Vmware Data Recovery distribution

  Hi all

  When I tried to start VM in Vmware Data recovery, her gives me error as

  "your cpu does not support long mode. use a 32-bit distribution"

  I tried searching for the 32-bit version of data recovery, but not able to find out.

  Help, please

  Kind regards

  Selim Desai

  You can add a 64-bit host to a virtualized session of ESXi. The ability of VT is not transmitted to a guest operating system.

• Cannot install Silverlight, get error 1503, CPU does not support the SSE instruction set that Silverlight requires to run

  Original title: silverlight

  I tried to install Silverlight on my computer running Windows XP 32-bit with service pack 3. My question is, it downloads and then when I try to install, it appears that my CPU will not Silverlight support. I get the Message 1503, CPU does not support the SSE instruction set that Silverlight requires to operate.

  So here's my question... How can I fix it? And what is the problem? Any help would be appreciated... Is it a I need a new operating system problem or just a cranky computer problem?
  Thank you
  Lynn

  I tried to install Silverlight on my computer running Windows XP 32-bit with service pack 3. My question is, it downloads and then when I try to install, it appears that my CPU will not Silverlight support. I get the Message 1503, CPU does not support the SSE instruction set that Silverlight requires to operate.

  So here's my question... How can I fix it? And what is the problem? Any help would be appreciated... Is it a I need a new operating system problem or just a cranky computer problem?

  Thank you

  Lynn

  ========================================
  This means that your material is not up to the task.

  If you search the Forums Silverlight 1503
  you will find that you are not alone.

  Silverlight .NET forums
  http://forums.Silverlight.NET/search

  The following article explains what is a CPU.

  Central processing unit
  http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_processing_unit

• MS-DOS 16-bit subsystem. The system does not support the mode full-screen.

  I when even run some dos applications, which allows to work ok under XP mode full-screen, but when you use Vista or Windows 7. I can only rum these applications in a window.
  The error message is

  MS-DOS 16-bit subsystem. The system does not support the mode full-screen.

  Please is anyway I could run in fullscreen... I don't want to use a virtual machine.

  Any advice would be greatly appreciated

  Of Ernest24

  http://www.dosbox.com/

  You might be interested in reading about DosBox.

  See you soon. Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• Upgrading from Windows Vista Home Premium at 8 - CPU does not support NX

  Hello

  I have Vista Home Premium (very probably OEM as it came with the PC) on a PC and I bought the upgrade license to Windows 8 Pro.
  I understand that it is in terms of the license transition, but here is my problem:
  The CPU does not support NX (and for sure there is no setting in the BIOS for this).
  So I can't move to 8.
  To replace the CPU, I need to replace the motherboard.
  If I replace the motherboard my understanding is I'm losing the license because it OEM.
  So, in reality, I can't switch to Win 8.
  The license, I bought said that I can pass any system running XP, Vista, Win 7 to 8 Win.
  It does not distinguish between older versions of Windows OEM and retail versions.
  For me, it's a huge conflict.
  So the question is:
  Can I change the CPU + motherboard to earn 8? or not?
  Thank you
  It has been some time but I finally had the time to do the upgrade (hardware + software).
  For history and for others who could come on this post with a similar question and be discouraged by responses like this:
  I contacted the technical support of MS and they confirmed that I had a Windows 8 Pro upgrade license and after upgrading my license would Win 8 Pro full-detail (what you want to call it). Essentially, after upgrade, I can reinstall any other motherboard. Of course you can only use a license on a machine at one time.
  (Of course your upgrade license type may be different to mine, so you should check they type of license)
  In any case, what is more interesting, it of that I got the confirmation that I can do a clean install and activate my upgrade license. Not only that, but they recommended the installation of Vista should not be present when installing on 8 to win. I was very skeptical and I asked for an account of the cat to be on the right side. They assured me that the support had made several times and is not a problem.
  And so, I do a clean install on the new motherboard (and a new player) and activated windows 8 with no problems at all.
  It seems very stupid that you can change the motherboard after the upgrade, but could not make the move and the Windows update at the same time. Fortunately, it is not the case.
  To me, it seems that the MS are aware that in you to go from XP (soon), they should also use the materials for the upgrade.

• The system does not support the mode full screen for cmd

  Respected Sir/Madam

  I am user of Windows vista HOme basic... .also I have Windows 7 user... I'm basicllly, a student in computer engineering...

  I get an error "The system does not support the mode full screen" for cmd.exe in C++ turboo or JDK.. .then I getproblem by entering n compiled the program...

  my PC configuration is

  :-AMD 6000 + dual core Athlon 64 X processor

  Monitor:-Viewsoni

  RAM :-1Go

  Please give me a solution to problem 4 I wanted to run cmd mode full screen...

  your help will be appreciated by me highlly...

  thanking you

  Philippe

  Vista + do not support a command prompt full screen, as indicated by the message. You can manipulate the available to the command window to specify the width and height to be as big as you want, but this isn't quite the same thing...

• Hardware does not support CVS mode?

  Hello

  Today, I get 2 new servers which will extend my current cluster, they are both HP ProLiant DL385 G6.

  In the cluster I have HP ProLiant DL385 G5 x 3, with 2 x AMD Opteron 2352 in each server (Quad core)

  In order to prepare the new servers, I checked up on top of the compability and I could see that servers were listed as supported with EVC mode. However when I try now to activate the CVS for the cluster, I get an error about VCA mode is not supported by the hardware. This page lists the AMD Opteron 23xx as supported: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 1003212 (generation 3), using the WebHCL, which also lists the servers in charge makes me a little comfused about why his does not work.

  I currently have ESX 3.5.0 build of the 213532 on the servers, plan to reinstall with ESXi 4.1 when new servers are set up in the same cluster of unload

  Servers was transferred yesterday from the old VC2.5 with the new VC4.1 which I have set up on a separate, new box. Other servers that I have on that (without other clusters) seem to work just OK, even improved 20 from ESX3.5 to ESX4.1 during the week.

  Any ideas what may cause this?

  Best regards

  Rune Darrud

  You can check if your ESX identifies your hardware to be compatible by using this Ko EVC.

• Adobe animate html5 canvas does not support blend modes?

  I need to multiply the two images of the ideas?

  I know that this can be done simply write the code, but if I was fit to what I wouldn't need Adobe animate.

  Blend modes using the canvas HTML | Web Platform Team Blog

  canvas Animate only supports two modes of fusion of the ide and deny multiply.

• Video playback dynadock U3.0 does not support the mode full screen

  Hello

  I bought a U3.0 Dynadock and use it with a Zenbook UX32V and an iiyama external display with a resolution of 1920 x 1920

  Everything works fine but the video playback in full screen - no matter, I use the flash player, VLC or WMP. Video playback works well in window mode, but when I switch to full screen, just a black screen and the cursor of the mouse appears.

  Interestingly, when I press the right mouse button to open the context menu all in video playbyck, video is shown both that the context menu has the focus.

  I've updated to the latest display drivers, but it did not help.
  Does anybody know a solution for this?

  Thank you

  Martin

  Hello

  Check the display driver newest Dynadock and so update the driver from this page:
  http://www.DisplayLink.com/support/downloads.php

• Win 95/98 and xp - download fractal program = works ok; Download program OK vista; try to run = "vista does not support the mode full-screen" I do not understand this. What can we do to make this porogram work?

  the downloaded program title is taken from the site spanky. the title is frain204 zip

  Have you checked with the person or the company that produces the show? Whereas it is for Windows 95, 98 and XP, it may well not be compatible with Vista.

  "spud-u-like" wrote in the new message: * e-mail address is removed from the privacy... *

  the downloaded program title is taken from the site spanky. the title is frain204 zip

• MS - (Win8.1) your processor does not support PrefetchW?

  OK, in 2012, many windows users have been attracted to try the new Windows 8.

  on a desktop Dell Pentium 4 2005, I installed windows8 pro x 64.

  and it has worked pretty well so far.

  now in 2014, I hear it takes to continue to support an upgrade to Windows 8.1?

  the problem is that Microsoft has added new restrictions of hardware to Windows 8.1?

  both single-core and even some dual-core PC that turns Windows 8 successfully.

  they are now locked this mandatory upgrade for Windows 8.1?

  Here is my screenshot after trying to upgrade to Windows 8.1.

  

  as you can see my CPU does not support the "PrefetchW?

  There are no updates latest BIOS for this motherboard from 2005.

  This system supports Windows 8 with no problems.

  It's only "PrefetchW" which is lacking.

  

  all required components are there,

  

  so my question is this?

  What is the "end of support Drop-Dead?

  for those of us who "can not put" because of "these new restrictions of material.

  at this Microsoft link.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/GP/lifecycle-Windows81-FAQ

  It is said: " Why do you require Windows 8 customers switch to Windows 8.1". ".

  and this statement is made.

  "Windows 8.1 does not any hardware requirements compared to Windows 7 or Windows 8".

  of course, this statement by Microsoft is in error?

  This particular PC currently dual-boots Windows 7 Ultimate edition and Windows 8 pro.

  None of these 2 Windows OS need "PrefetchW.

  but I know that this requirement will not change.

  Once again what is the 'final date' that Windows 8 will receive support.

  on a system where Microsoft prevented any future updated.

  Thank you.

  The 'Official' date posted the C/net awhile back was in January 2016, or upgrade you to Windows 8.1 by then or not many updates to security. so by then you'll have to upgrade or lose these monthly updates.

• Cannot migrate VM between 5.5 ESXi versions: the version of the product to the destination host does not support one or several CPU features

  We receive an error message that I am trying to make sense. I understand very well the notion of compatibility, CPU, CPUID, masking and so on, after working on a competitor hypervisor. However, this error seems wrong (or needs better wording) based on my understanding:

  Here is the message:

  ----

  A general error occurred: the version of the product to the destination host does not support one or several features of the CPU currently use by the virtual machine.

  Characteristics of CPUID level 0 x 1 'ecx' register are indicated with a '1' bit: x00x:xxx0:xx0x:x 000: x 0 11xx:00: 00xx:11xx

  ----

  
  

  This happened during the migration between two hosts ESXi with the same physical processors - in this case, a Westmere X 5650.

  
  

  The source host is on ESXi build 2068190 (5.5). The destination host is on ESXi build 1474528.

  
  

  The bits it seems to complain are:

  
  

  DTES64

  Monitor/MWait

  Cx16

  PDCM

  The punch line seems to be: "the product version of the destination host. However, I have trouble believing that support for these features have been added to ESXi between the two versions. If it were, VMware has been certainly silent about.

  For what it's worth, explicitly set us the CPUID masks in our virtual machines (no, CVS is not an option for us at this time.) This is the mask:

  CPUID.1.EAX = "00000000000000100000011001010001".

  CPUID.1.ECX = "00000010100110001110001000111111".

  CPUID.1.EDX = "10001111111010111111101111111111".

  CPUID.80000001.ECX = "00000000000000000000000000000001.

  CPUID.80000001.EDX = "00101000000100000000100000000000".

  cpuid.d.EAX = "00000000000000000000000000000000".

  cpuid.d.ECX = "00000000000000000000000000000000".

  cpuid.d.EDX = "00000000000000000000000000000000".

  Note that the bits of the message complains (2, 3, 14, 15) * are * in fact forced to '1' in our mask of cpuid.1.ecx. That means (if I understand correctly), ESXi does not have the virtual machine unless the host processor supports the feature. And in our case, the virtual machine will start with happiness on nodes, with both versions. It will be not simply migrate between them.

  So, long story short, is this a bug of ESXi? The error message is misleading? I understand something?

  Thank you

  
  Matt

  To use the masks feature VM in this way, you must replace all the 1 to your masks with-'s:

  CPUID.1.EAX = "00000000000000-000000 - 00-0 - 000-

  CPUID.1.ECX = "000000-0-00--000---000-000---".

  CPUID.1.EDX = '-000 - 0-0 - 0-

  CPUID.80000001.ECX = "0000000000000000000000000000000 -"

  CPUID.80000001.EDX = "00-0-000000-00000000-00000000000.

  cpuid.d.EAX = "00000000000000000000000000000000".

  cpuid.d.ECX = "00000000000000000000000000000000".

  cpuid.d.EDX = "00000000000000000000000000000000".

  Zeros erases the features that are not available on your hosts Westmere, and dashes will leave the other one features.  The problem with those masks was forced to you certain features on who would have normally been off.

• HA mode does not support more than one VC DC?

  OK, this is a minor blow of mouth/feature request...

  So according to what follows - http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 2115878 #sf39023518

  vROps HA does not support separate nodes in DCs, it was a surprise for me, especially when the reason is latency again during a test on a 10 Gbps LAN it still does not work after a period of time(<2ms)

  Part of my hope/expectation (rightly or wrongly) was to cover 2 physical DCs (2xVCs) give me a solution truly HA when in fact the PA are now limited to be local HA (one could say that you can count on vSphere HA)

  Even in local mode HA doesn't protect you waste of time during the correction of the product... If its value decreases...

  Now, if I missed something please let me know I'd be happy to see different results from what I see above.

  Otherwise, consider this a feature request that vROps is really a great tool, but HA must be more that she should now be regarded as truly HA IMO.

  RV Ops HA is not intended or designed to manage data centers. Latency conditions are tight, stretching on domain controllers, it is impossible at this time (v6.0.2). HA mode is designed to protect your data/cluster falls down if you lose a single node of the cluster. The recommendation is to put the replica on host/different data store, so even if you leave the underlying resources for the master, you still have you cluster config/master role online. I support your hope that HA will get better, and I am sure that he will do!