Create a unique reference in step custom type to store execution

Similar Questions

• is there a way that we could create a unique link that someone can click on an email to bring them to a cart to fill their quote?

  is there a way that we could create a unique link that someone can click on an email to bring them to a cart to fill their quote?

  Hello

  Here is how the configuration would work - http://client2.worldsecuresystems.com/get-quote/java-in-a-nutshell - you can add some nice CSS to ensure that the screen does not Flash or anything like that. Here's how it was built:

  1. create a new model, paste this piece of code inside:

  {tag_pagecontent}
  

  2 create a new catalog, all the products of this catalogue will redirect users directly to the GET a quote form. Assign the model created in step 1

  3 change the presentation of the latge product and place the button buy now in a hidden div:

   
  {tag_buynow}
  

  4. change the shopping basket page layout and make sure the GET a quote button is present:

  {tag_getquotebutton}
  

  5. place this code at the end. You need to replace 606879 with the ID of the catalog created in step 2

  {% if globals.get.CatalogueID == 606879 %}
  
  {% endif %}
  

  What will happen, it is like this:

  1. whenever someone opens a product using the link to the custom catalog buy it button will now be clicked
  2. the site visitor is then redirected to shopping cart layout where the other script checks the catalog, the visitors came. If this is a "known" catalog redirect another arrives and load the GET a quote layout

  Make sure that you have loaded in your models of jQuery and liquid activated on your site.

  One more thing, you need to monitor is you will need hide this catalog custom catalog your site listing.

  Hope this helps,

  Mihai

• Table of references to the different types of performance issue

  Hi all

  See the attached code. I use a reminder VI and must pass a few references via the user's settings. I use a table.

  This is to avoid the constraint (should I care?), I type cast to more of a generic class, then in the callback function, go to a more specific class. (What is the best way to do it?)

  As you can see, even if, for some reason, almost all the nodes property are reading as variants, forcing me to use data Variant, which seems inefficient. Why is this the case? If I type cast to a Boolean, the value should be a bool... Why force me to use for the data range?

  Is there a better way to do this? Thanks for the comments.

  If you use a cluster of istead of a table, you can maintain the rigour of the reference.

  The reason why you have found variants is that you don't are not cast the ref to the same type. Try...

  Hand, create a strict constant of the wire Ref. Make slide a constant in the call back VI and use it when you launch as more specific. Property nodes you adapt to the specific data type they have in hand.

  Note:

  You can also create references of the appropriate type by dragging the appropriate type of control in the Ref control and it will fit.

  I hope that makes sense.

  Ben

• declare the custom type as a variable % ROWTYPE package

  I create a bunch of FOLDER custom types in a specification of package as follows:
  

  CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE mypackage AS
  
  TYPE t1 IS RECORD (a number, b number);
  ...

  For consistency, I want to create a custom package type that uses a table % ROWTYPE, something like this:
  

  TYPE t2 IS RECORD (table%ROWTYPE);

  Is it possible somehow?
  
  Tom

  You can use a subtype:
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/AppDev.112/e25519/datatypes.htm#LNPLS99935

  SUBTYPE t2 is table%ROWTYPE;
  

  Edited by: bencol on 6 June 2013 18:01

• Using the function RowIdToRowNum to create a unique identification number

  Hello
  I have an obligation to create a unique number that can be used for an authorization number. The client is already displaying the RowId on the screen in order to use it as directly as the authorization number is originally a security problem. Rep of the screen viewing can predict the authorization number, just by looking at the row ID. The process is that a manager verifies a 'Question of authorization' checkbox and workflow implements the authorization number with a prefix of customer defined and some of the digits of the ID line.
  
  The solution I tried to use the RowIdToRowNum function to convert the ID number online. Documentation indicates that the number of output should look like this:
  Expression - RowIdToRowNum ("< AccountID > '")
  Result - 38-57119344
  
  What I mean in the workflow is in the following format: 0 < 10c0c0o0u0n0t18d0 > 0. Not the most presentable format above. Anyone have any idea why this is happening and how to fix it?
  
  If this is not the case, no one knows other ways to create a unique authorisation number. I also thought about a string of time based as YYMMDDHHMMSS. It works, not exactly predictable, but has a number 12-digit. Would be nice if it could be shorter.
  
  I will update this format when the staging is back. In the meantime, if anyonw has ideas about this I would appreciate it.
  Kind regards
  Charley
  
  Published by: ckscott on March 24, 2010 15:58
  
  Published by: ckscott on March 26, 2010 09:29

  It seems that the syntax in the online help is incorrect.

  I used the following syntax in many places. Try this.
  RowIdToRowNum ([])

• Please add support for channels DMA between RT/FPGA for custom types

  It is a request than a question at OR. Please find a way to provide support for custom types when data transfer between RT/FPGA. Even an ability to mount a type complex in a bit array and proceed with a redesign to the custom side type FPGA would be acceptable. Break my configuration in primitive data is completely unrealistic. So, I consume large amounts of FPGA resources passing data through the method of the façade. THX.

  There is an existing idea for this. Please Kudo it if you do not want to see this!

• How to find duplicate keys found when error ORA-01452: cannot CREATE a UNIQUE INDEX.

  Hi gurus,

  I fall for this stupid error

  "cannot CREATE a UNIQUE INDEX; duplicate keys found.

  
  

  It is that the Unique Index key is composed of multiple columns

  CREATE A UNIQUE KEY001AUTORISATIONS_APPORT ON TFT_AUTORISATIONS_APPORT INDEX

  (AUT_APPORTEUR, AUT_AGENCE, AUT_PRODUIT, AUT_OPTION, AUT_TARIF, AUT_DATE_AUTORISATION)

  TABLESPACE KEYS_TFT NOPARALLEL NOLOGGING

  Now,.

  My question is, how to find duplicates keys blocking Index creation?

  Thanks if you can help

  Run this query to display the list of the duplicates already existing.

  Select AUT_APPORTEUR, AUT_AGENCE, AUT_PRODUIT, AUT_OPTION, AUT_TARIF, AUT_DATE_AUTORISATION, count (1) as cnt

  of TFT_AUTORISATIONS_APPORT

  Group

  AUT_APPORTEUR, AUT_AGENCE, AUT_PRODUIT, AUT_OPTION, AUT_TARIF, AUT_DATE_AUTORISATION

  view count (1) > 1

  Concerning

  NJ

• Automatic assignment of record parent registration RN when created by OPA and involve a custom object

  The question that we face, it's what seems to be the forced transfer of the child for parent records records when she is using OPA integrated with RightNow to create records. This scenario is a little complex, so I put try it below with a structure to make it easier.

  • Scenario: creating records in RightNow across an interview of the OPA
  • OPA setting of mapping:
    • Personal contact Center (account)
    • At the beginning of the interview, load data related to an individual: Incident
    • At the end of the interview, update Incident
  • Data models:
    • OPA: Global-> [object custom-1] > [custom object 2]
      • all containment relationships
    • RN: Incident-> 1-> object custom object custom 2
      • All relationships of association
  • Detailed description: in Takeovers we are inferring creating two records personal 2 object with a Custom single object 1. In these registers Custom object 2, we put directly the field that contains the link PK 1 custom, object so that each personal object 2 is actually assigned in RN for different Custom object 1s. Some examples of data to explain:
    • Custom 1 object associated with the Incident, read in the OPA
      • ID is set to 123
    • 2 custom object created in OPA under instance of Custom 1 object with ID = 123
      • Link to PK for 1 item 123-custom
    • 2 custom object created in OPA under instance of Custom 1 object with ID = 123
      • PK link for 1 custom object on 345 (different from the Custom object 1 read OPA)
  • Expected behavior: the object two custom 2s are created and assigned to their respective different personal 1 item RightNow records.
  • Actual behavior: the object two custom 2s are created and assigned to the Custom object with ID 123 1

  To continue the investigation, we then tested using a different set of objects, standard objects, but with the same rules:

  • Data models:
    • OPA: Global-> contact-> the incident
      • all containment relationships
    • RN: Organization-> (current) Contact-> Incident (custom object)
      • all relationships of association
    • Detailed description: same logic as the previous
    • Customer expected: same as previous
    • Actual behavior: Matches expected behavior. The Incidents have been correctly assigned to their two different respective Contacts

  This behavior of divestiture now seems specific to custom objects, but can ayone confirms that this is the case and the behavior expected please?

  In addition, we are confident that when you test this feature about 2 weeks ago, we received the expected behavior in BOTH cases to 80%. Maybe it's because changing the configuration in our RN environment that we are not aware of, so we are investingating cela, but are there changes to the OPA / connectors deployment for customer environments in recent weeks that could have caused this please?

  Finally, if this could be affected by a change of configuration of RN, nobody knows what this configuration can be please?

  I can confirm that this is the expected behavior. A few more details are given in the article of doco hierarchies entity Understand - he explains how the containment relationships mapped determines the assignment to the parent.

  The reason for this behavior is that most of the time, it makes sense that the registration of the new entity instances to 'work', feel that they are saved in exactly the same hierarchy of containment that was present in the OPA, and in a way that ensures referential integrity (we support in particular the case where the whole hierarchy of objects is created at the same time if the parent does not yet exist at the time of the creation of the rule (, so you couldn't possibly know its ID). Otherwise, as Matt says, is up to the author of the rule to make sure that, for example, 345 is a valid foreign key.

  This behavior should be the same for the built-in objects as well as custom objects, and as Brad says he has not changed recently. If you see this behavior in some cases but not in others, what this means is that probably in cases where it works as expected, there are multiple relationships between the parent and the child object, and it happens that the foreign key that you set manually is different from the foreign key of the mapped containment relationship.

• How to create a unique fixed break point to allow scrolling effects?

  I am creating a site that has scrolling effects. I somehow just can't understand for the life of me how to create a 'unique fixed breakpoint. I already have a fluid breakpoint, and whenever I try adding one, it does not always activate scrolling effects. I think it's something very obvious, I'm missing - any advice?

  To use the effects of roll, your site must be fixed in width, not fluid. Scroll effects are disabled when you add a second breakpoint.

  David

  Creative muse

• Why we cannot create more than one primary key on a table. Why we create several unique key on a table. Please explain if anyone have details of this.

  Why we cannot create more than one primary key on a table. Why we create several unique key on a table. Please explain if anyone have details of this.

  «a primary key has semantic meaning, it is to be immutable (never change of value), unique and not null.»

  a unique constraint is simply "at any time, these values are unique - they can change and they can be null.

  You use a unique when constraint

  (a) you do not already have a primary key for a table can have only one
  (b) you allow NULL values in attributes
  "(c) to allow you to update the values in the attributes.

  https://asktom.Oracle.com/pls/Apex/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:5541352100346689891

• Can we create a Unique constraint on DFF attribute of a Standard Oracle Table

  Hi all

  Can we create a Unique constraint on DFF attribute of a Standard Oracle Table.

  There will be problems of integrity of the data in this case?

  Any help will be greatly appreciated.

  Best regards

  gt1942

  You should not. The same field of de FACTO forces might be used beyond business groups/associations causing cross-functional problems. This would be considered a direct customization and may affect Oracle features seeded depending on where you want to add it.

  Kind regards

  Arif.

• How to create a Unique constraint on a column that already has duplicates. Only future duplicates should be avoided

  Hi all

  Can someone let me know how to create a Unique constraint on a column that already has duplicates. Only future duplicates must be avoided.

  Any help will be greatly appreciated.

  Best regards

  gt1942

  ALTER table Add constraint unique (column_name) may be deferred novalidate;

• How to fill out the customer type when you submit a form?

  How to fill out the customer type when you submit a form?

  You can't do right now in British Colombia by means of forms.

• HI, I'm wanting the form tool allows you to create multiple copies of documents with customized in each information fields. From excel data. Is this possible?  Thank you, Charlotte

  Hello

  I am keen on the form tool allows you to create multiple copies of documents with customized in each information fields. From excel data. Is this possible?

  Thank you

  Charlotte

  This is called a fusion and mailing. There is a possibility of Embedment in some versions of Excel (via the Acrobat PDFMaker plugin), or it can be done using a script.

• When you create a PDF to ppt, pdf can be created in unique pages instead of a complete document

  When you create a PDF to ppt, pdf can be created in unique pages instead of a complete document?

  After Acrobat create a PDF from multiple pages, you can use the Extract command to break into single pages. You can do this either in tools > Pages, or in the Options menu for the Page thumbnails pane.