CS6/Wacom pixelated lines

Similar Questions

• iPod nano 7th gen stuck/dead pixel line

  Hello my iPod nano suddenly has this line of greenish pixel, it will not go away at all, and I have no idea if Apple will fix it? Here's a picture of him in the application of fitness

  Hi Luke.1904,

  I understand you've got a green line that runs through the entire screen of your iPod nano. It is indicative of a problem with the display hardware, requiring repairs to correct. The link below provides information about the implementation of service for your iPod nano.

  The response service center - iPod

  http://support.Apple.com/kb/index?page=servicefaq&geo=United_States&product=iPod

  See you soon!

• The ideapad 100 pixel line.

  Hello

  I just bought a Lenovo Ideapad 15 '' 100 in Lagos in Nigeria and a few days ago. He fell on the height of the size and developed a line of white pixels on the screen. Is it possible to fix or get a replacement screen and how much it costs?

  Welcome to the community of Lenovo!

  Sorry to hear about the incident in question.

  The best source for more information about the repair and the cost of repair would be to contact the Lenovo Support in your country.

  Lenovo - Nigeria support

• Pixelated lines when exporting .mov

  Sorry that if this is a dumb question (I'm pretty new to Flash animation), but everytime I try to export an animation I did the final .mov seems pixelated and blurry. When I view the Flash animation, it seems clear, but the exported version is just the opposite. My document is 1920 x 1080 and 24 fps and the publication of all settings seem to them. I would really appreciate if someone could help me. Thank you!

  I think you can zoom in on the video and think that it will always be vectors. It is bound to look pixelated, if you are > 100% and you will see anti-aliasing on the big screens.

  I did a test where I took a screenshot of your MOV, your FLA running in a SWF, then I tried the code quality and grabbed the MOV and SWF for this too. I put them in four layers in Photoshop, and then assign the surface layer of Subtract. If I moved this image on one of the other three, the area became black Uni. In other words, they were all identical.

  So, I don't know why you see pixelated. Even on my non - retina 27 inch monitor anti-aliasing is difficult to notice.

  Also, what program you are viewing the MOV in?

• CS6 - block graphic line.

  I have a rather strange problem.

  I created a box with a top component, medium and low component. I am having a problem making the middle and lower parts connect and appear smooth. In InDesign, the parties seem to fit well but in the PDF Viewer, it is different (and unacceptable) at various magnifications.

  I inserted an illustration showing the appearance at different zoom levels. How can I fix this annoying aspect to that, at least, the appearance is acceptable in low zoom levels?

  BTW, the lines are all exactly the same width. They were created in InDesign using the curved corner box. I then used the scissors to split the box (so that I can stretch the middle section without affecting/changing the shape of the corners).

  Thank you

  

  I don't understand why you have to divide the area in the first place. You can easily resize a box corner rounded without affecting the corners.

• Restore the CS6 cropped Pixels

  How?

  Assuming that you did not have the [] delete the cropped Pixels option checked, simply run the crop tool and make it the largest culture.

  Also you can make Image - reveal all.

  -Christmas

• New mac book, cs6 sequelae do not open, all produced cs6 pixelated

  I just downloaded my suite cs6 on my new computer (Mac book Pro). All programs cs6 appear pixelated. Also my consequences does not open and said he may not be running this version of Mac OS X. Any suggestions?

  > As my consequences does not open and said he may not be running this version of Mac OS X. Any suggestions?

  Install the latest update for After Effects CS6:

  http://Adobe.LY/DVA_updates

• Unable to scroll 1 pixel (Alt + mouse wheel) more (after updating FF from 12.0 to 20.0.1) - is there a solution without Add-ons?

  Since I need a pixel of ScrollBar of the browser window, in FF 12.0 I used:

  MouseWheel.withaltkey.action = 4

  MouseWheel.withaltkey.numlines = 1

  MouseWheel.withaltkey.sysnumlines = false

  and I was able to use Alt + wheel to scroll the content of only 1 pixel.

  However, after updated to FF 20.0.1 Alt + mouse wheel stopped working so I try to reactivate the feature, but without success. According to me, there were a few changes from 17 FF:

  https://wiki.Mozilla.org/Gecko:Mouse_Wheel_Scrolling

  Pixel scrolling seem to be now removed from suggestions, action = 4 once upon a time "Document scroll by a number of pixels (given by the numlinesrequired property)" and now it says:

  ' Note that unlike 16 or earlier, you cannot specify the unit values of delta such as scrolling by pixel, line or page. That is, you cannot specify the value of deltaMode of DOM WheelEvent with all preferences. Under Windows, the unit of scrolling is online or page with the mouse wheel. »

  Is there a solution to re - activate a pixel scrolling without having to install Add - ons (each add-on for smooth scrolling some other behavior changes)?

  There was changes in the prefs of mousewheel as a result of the implementation of the DOM3 (Bug 719320) scrolling mouse wheel.

  I don't think that it is possible to replace / adjust the amount of scrolling when you use a modifier key for a certain number of pixels.

  There is only the delta multipliers that change the number of lines (33 changes scrolling amount to one-third), so probably closed you can get is to assign the action to the modifier Alt 1 (or 1% of the default).

  You can change mousewheel.*.delta_multiplier_y prefs (vertical axis) to change the vertical scroll amount.

  • MouseWheel.system_scroll_override_on_root_content. Enabled-> true
  • MouseWheel.with_control.delta_multiplier_y

• Problem with animation line flicker/aliasing

  Hi I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions on trying to get this smoother animation and a little crisper.

  I know that the quality will be slightly less good in a gif format.

  https://S3.amazonaws.com/uploads.hipchat.com/115279/3089179/b6GFClDGSBHAucu/lines.gif

  Thank you

  Let me give you a few basics. These are things that are not considered by almost everyone that starts working in the video, especially those who come from a print or web design background. Photographers are also victims of a flaw in their knowledge which is understandable because they have never had to deal with things like this before. Here are the facts.

  First Point:
  Video (and everything that comes from digital displays) are always arranged on a grid of pixels. No exception. You can never put a line width of single pixel on this grid of pixels and do appear as a single pixel line, unless it lines up perfectly. Nothing that is not precisely aligned to the pixel grid is interpreted. It is called Anti-aliasing. This means that if your 1-pixel thick line is to halfway between grid display will be the average of the values in this row and you end up with a broad line of two pixels on the screen with each line taking half the value of the color of the original line. In other words if you are not precisely aligned on the grid of your 1-pixel wide black line becomes a 2px wide gray line.

  Second Point:
  Video is composed of images that reading at a particular rate. Your screen also has a refresh rate. Display rate standard in countries that have 60 Hz electricity usually have a refresh rate standard 60 Hz or multiples of a whole number of this rate divider. In countries where electricity is 50 Hz (Europe), the refresh rate is usually 50 Hz. The video frame rate for video in NTSC countries (most of the world) are normalized to 29.97 FPS (there's a reason associated with the problem of broadcasting TV signals in color, but I won't go into that right now). The Standard in PAL countries video frame rate is 25 fps. When you choose a frame rate for your video project which is not the frequency of standard images for your area, you may rate for your video come into conflict with the cadence of your screen. This can cause perfectly smooth motion judder and there is nothing you can do about it, except change the refresh rate of your screen or lift it up with a new high refresh rate capable display or change the frame rate of your video.

  Third Point:

  The average human eye and brain have a property called retinal retention. These effects how we perceive motion. No matter what you do, most people perceive incorrectly flexible movement across their field of vision. Most of the time the brain tries to iron out things and your eyes automatically try and follow this movement. This effect is well understood by the great directors when they block shots and the great directors of photography when they put cameras if your eye is directed to the part of the frame where they want that to get you to understand the history.

  Fourth Point:
  There is a strobe effect that applies to all the movements. For example, if you watch an old movie on TV western, you will sometimes see the wheels of the car rotate backwards. Smart of an airplane propeller video phone can show you that strange Sword-shaped blades turn slowly or even backwards. It's the interaction between pace and movement. The only way to create videos that shows the movement correctly and in the right direction is to match the query of the cadence.

  Fifth Point:
  Work around the fine lines, turning it into a thicker lines is to disable interpolation. You can do in After Effects by selecting quality draft. With quality lit project, you will always have a thick black line of single pixel. This solves a problem, but worse the other. The problem of the stroboscopic effect. To make your single pixel with black line SOUPLESE you must match the query of the line to the frame rate. You move 1 pixel by image or 2 pixels per image or 3 pixels per image or 4. You cannot move to 1.4 or 2.8 pixels per image. It won't wok, it would never work.

  Sixth Point:
  Even if you perfectly fit the pixel grid movement, you can still run on the retinal retention problem and frame rates. Every Director of professional photography with a value of his day rate knows that there are critical speeds of Pan - speeds during which you can not move the camera in a scene and offer a scene that doesn't pan and look terrible. Jerking can be so bad that it gives people headaches and worse. The frequency of images the more cautious, be with the camera. When the video cameras of 24 frames per second were introduced a whole bunch of people came back with horrible images. Shots that run at 29.97 work at 24. Cadence, retention of the retina, strobe effect and your brain combined with no fixed focal point for your eyes to focus on and track combine to fault up to the shooting and of the query.

  The solution:
  When you want to animate a thin line, you're better off at 29.97 frames per second that anything slower. 30 is OK if you go never broadcast or DVD to watch on a TV. You can use an expression to control the movement, so that your line moves exactly an even number of pixels per image. If your design requires that go you faster you must hide the problem with motion blur. If you want to lighten in and clear it of movement then you must hide the problem of aliasing with motion blur. Smooth long moves must be exactly to an even number of pixels per image. You have more options of speed at a higher speed. Even at a higher speed, you will encounter the problem of the sixth Point.

  The evidence:
  Any problem of smoothing by giving you the discount gray lines load the rendering of your lines animated in AE and step as part of an animation at the same time. Baring any cache image and to make the issues I bet that your animation will run without difficulty from one image to the other. It is only when the video plays back at speed that your eyes and your brain will tell you that the movement is uneven.

  Certain standards:
  Go to a cinema and watch the end titles. It takes about 7 or 8 seconds (depending on the height of the frame) for securities to roll from the bottom of the screen upwards. The second seven rule is pretty standard. With 29.97 FPS 1 video per image pixel, 2 pixels per image and 4 pixels per image work well enough for most applications. When you find a speed frame rate works for your video, it's the frame size and it is write it down. Use it again and again.

  This is an expression that works at the speed of the animation and allows blur to apply to your image. You can do the movement meet the markers if you want to start and stop. I have a bunch of preset animations that I use all the time for that style of animation.

  Bottom-up:

  t = time;

  en = t/thisComp.frameDuration;

  x = value [0];

  s = 4; Speed in pixels per image must be an integer

  y = value [1] - (fr * s);

  [x, y]

  Left to right:

  t = time;

  en = t/thisComp.frameDuration;

  y = value [1];

  s = 4; Speed in pixels per image must be an integer

  x = value [1] - (fr * s);

  [x, y]

  If you wish to reverse the direction, you can add a sign less in the final table or apply the term of anchor instead of position. These expressions take the initial starting position of the layer as a starting point. Both are moving to 4 pixels per image. To start and stop the movement, the simplest method is to split the layer, add the expression, let the layer move, then divide the layer again and delete the expression. If you are handy with expressions, you can bind the movement to layer markers, and then just move the markers for start and stop, or even reverse the direction of a single layer.

  If you don't want to mess with all those unbreakable rules then jack up motion blur and uses a higher cadence with thicker lines and hidden defects. There are no other solutions.

• Scripting: Count the number of selected pixels (non-quadrangle) or alternative approach

  Is it possible to count the number of pixels in a selection that is not a quadrilateral? For example, if I have cntl - click on the thumbnail of a text layer, I would like to know how many pixels is selected.

  This application, if anyone has another approach to try...

  

  My goal is the place the text at some point where it covers do not all lines (or, Alternatively, the place where it covers the smallest number of pixels line). My approach is to insert a text in red to the desired location, apply a BlendMode.Multiply to the text. The number of Red pixels always on the screen will show how many pixels line I'm concealing. Then I move the text into a region and check the histogram in 76 index (which is 255,0,0), find the point with the highest number of red (meaning concealing pixels less line) and finally move the text at that location. See the code snippet below:

  var bestCX = cX;

  var bestCY = cY;

  var bestPixelDensity = - 1;

  var pixelDensity = 0;

  var searchRegionWidth = 3000;

  var searchRegionHeight = 2000;

  loop through an area 3000 x 2000 around where you want

  for (var x = cX - searchRegionWidth/2; x < cX + searchRegionWidth/2; x ++)

  {

  for (var y = cY - searchRegionHeight/2; y < cY + (searchRegionHeight/2); y ++)

  {

  textItemRef.position = new Array (x, y);

  pixelDensity = myDocument.histogram [76]; index of 255,0,0 (red)

  If this point is greater than the previous highest density, use it instead.

  if(pixelDensity > bestPixelDensity)

  {

  bestCX = x;

  bestCY = y;

  bestPixelDensity = pixelDensity;

  }

  }

  }

  move text in the best location found

  textItemRef.position = new Array (bestCX, bestCY);

  The problem is that the images I use are very large ((7000x7000px) for each histogram control takes a few seconds and I really need to move in a fairly large region (3000 x 2000) to find the best place.) I think that it is perhaps faster if I'm not using the histogram at all, and instead each time that I move the text, I select the text and see how many points is in the selection. Any help or alternative approaches would be great!

  I don't know the answer, the only thing I can think is the whole of the histogram to the selection and treatment of the histogram of the selected area.

• Photoshop opens the dialog box when you try to fill a layer with locked transparent pixels

  This script should set the layer to lock transparent pixels and then fill the layer with a color. She is doing this, except when it is in the filling phase, it opens the dialog box fill, and you have to hit OK.

  If you omit the transparent pixel line, it works as not expected, no dialog boxes.

  Is there a way to remove the box? Or I'm doing something wrong, which is causing the box to open?

  #target photoshop
  app.bringToFront();
  
  doc = app.activeDocument;
  doc.artLayers[0].isBackgroundLayer = false;
  doc.artLayers[0].transparentPixelsLocked = true;
  app.activeDocument.selection.fill(app.foregroundColor); 
  

  Not sure why this is happening.

  But I would recommend blocking the above and using the AM code for a fill that pays tribute to transparency.

  #target photoshop

  app.bringToFront ();

  doc = app.activeDocument;

  doc.artLayers [0] .isBackgroundLayer = false;

  doc.activeLayer = doc.artLayers [0];

  // =======================================================

  idFl var = charIDToTypeID ("Fl");

  var desc18 = new ActionDescriptor();

  var idUsng = charIDToTypeID ("Usng");

  var idFlCn = charIDToTypeID ("FlCn");

  var idFrgC = charIDToTypeID ("FrgC");

  desc18.putEnumerated (idUsng, idFlCn, idFrgC);

  var idOpct = charIDToTypeID ("PCT");

  var idPrc = charIDToTypeID ("#Prc");

  desc18.putUnitDouble (idOpct, idPrc, 100.000000);

  TSM var = charIDToTypeID ("Md");

  var idBlnM = charIDToTypeID ("BlnM");

  var idNrml = charIDToTypeID ("Nrml");

  desc18.putEnumerated (TSM, idBlnM, idNrml);

  var idPrsT = charIDToTypeID ("PrsT");

  desc18.putBoolean (idPrsT, true);

  executeAction (idFl, desc18, DialogModes.NO);

• Horizontal line in the viewer Android

  I built a viewer Android native application (currently in the store of Google play) and published a few inside pages. For some reason any on some smooth scrolling pages appeared as to where the "fold" would be a 1 pixel line. It is not consistent between articles, but is conistently reappear in the same place every time. I wonder if the Viewer is adding a line of 1 pixel between some of the 'pages' that should not have pages since it's scrolling smoothly. Any ideas how to fix?

  Hello

  The fix for this problem with being in the version 5/19. Thank you for your patience.

  -Dave

• Quality of the vectors in Illustrator CS6

  I've recently upgraded to CS6 and have a problem of vectors looking like they are pixelated. I don't know what it is. I work in a print document CMYK with high pixelation on (300 dpi) and aligned to the pixel grid is not lit. I uploaded three photos to illustrate what I'm talking about. The photos are all of the same O at 200%. The first screenshot is in Illustrator CS5. The second is what I see with the same shape in Illustrator CS6. In addition, so we are clear, I have not seen pixelated as the third screenshot shows the view with preview pixelated on. When I zoom back everything just fine together, makes it difficult to see the whole of creation - which, as you can imagine is pretty frustrating. I keep thinking there must be something with the display settings - but nothing I touch seems to make no difference. I really liked to switch to the CS6, but this question is really making me think otherwise. Help please?

  

  CS5 CS6 CS6 w / pixelated overview

  Why would you use Preview rasterized to a CMYK file?

  Anti-aliasing is enabled in the preferences?

  Why are you pixelation?

• Accidents vascular cerebral at the symbols do not properly flatten with other elements (CS5 and CS6)

  Hello

  We have a bunch of symbols of round button for navigation elements that are built in the following way:

  1. Symbol of the circle with a background and outline
  2. Symbol of circle placed in the symbols of button (for example, magnifying glass or arrow)
  3. Button symbols placed on the page

  This allows us to update the symbol of the bottom circle and have all the buttons (about 30 of them) update both.

  But when symbols return on a dark background, they look like some evil claire raster images - i.e. the edges of crenelated look like they have been flattened on white instead of merging with the background color as a 24-bit png.

  I hope you can see the kind of bitsy edge in the image below to see what I mean:

  

  I don't remember having this problem in the past - I fiddled with the settings of the race, but still no luck, here are the settings as they exist currently:

  

  Is there a setting that controls this behavior I could have changed or missed?

  See you soon

  Ben

  There is a dirty little secret with 1 pixel lines: they are not actually aligned in the Center. (How could they be and still stay?) So that your line of single pixel is actually aligned inside. And it is anti-aliased. Most likely what you are noticing is the color fill slightly showing through the semi-transparent parts of the race.

  A couple ideas on how to solve this problem: a) set STROKE width of 2px, centered and choose 'Fill on line' under stroke Options, line width b) leave to 1px, line up outside and reduce the dimensions of the object of 1px, STROKE c) Set against zero and adds the line using Photoshop live effects. Somehow, any position is chosen for the alignment of the line in Photoshop live effects, filling line along the outer edges is not a problem. However, each solution will change how the circle is rendered a little, in order to find the best solution requires trial and error.

• Redownloading CS6?

  Hello

  If I bought and downloaded premium CS6 of production line to my
  Mac and then for a reason any got formatted my mac, I would be able
  CS6 againn redownload and my original serial key would work?

  Thank you

  Li

  Hi Li,

  I confirm Yes it will work well for you.

  Thank you

  Florian