DBMS_STATS. GATHER_schema_STATS METHOD_OPT = > 'FOR COLUMNS SIZE AUTO '.

Similar Questions

• ORA-12899: value too large for column (size: 30, maximum: 25)

  I try to insert values from one table to another using substr (column_x, 1, 25) (field target is of type varchar (25)) and I get an error: ORA-12899: value too large for column (size: 30, maximum: 25) how is this possible?

  SUBSTRB uses the same syntax:

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e41084/functions181.htm#i87066

  If chopping byte characters does not mean that you could end up with a partial character at the end for example if each character 2 bytes, then the last character would not that it is the first byte, so wouldn't an entire character.

  Depends on what you actually try to reach by taking the partial strings.

  Keep in mind, with the UTF8, you could have up to 4 bytes of length characters each.

• columns size auto or 1

  Hello

  We use auto size 0 columns in our stored procedure to collect statistics.

  Please let me know if there is an advantage of the use of column size 1 auto or auto size 0 to collect statistics.

  Kind regards

  VN

  If you gather statistics with SIZE 0 COLUMN and your question is what benefit if change us to 1 so my answer is

  I can't find any documentation on the value of 0->, so I don't know how oracle works with this value.

  What I know is that if you set this value to 1, then do you disable the collection of statistics of the histogram.

  But my assumption is that 0 means 1-> so there is no change-> but it's my hypothesis.

  -> Histogram statistics gathering are good or not good, it's a matter of adjustment. It depends!

• too big for column

  With the help of 11g...

  I am trying to insert data into a column in a table that contains postal codes with a varchar2 setting (5).

  When I try to run an insert, it keeps telling me:

  ORA-12899: value too large for column 'FY13_NRN_ADMIN '. "" POSTAL CODE "(real: 39, maximum: 9)

  So I ran a few tests...

  Select

  Max (length (zipcode)) zip_size

  of fy13_individual_data;

  ZIP_SIZE
  5

  Select distinct lengthb (zipcode) "length in bytes.

  of Fy13_individual_data;

  Length in bytes
  1
  5
  4

  So I tried to run the insert using a command of the substring.

  INSERT INTO FY13_NRN_ADMIN (ADMIN_CN,

  PURPOSE_SITE_WORKING,

  PURPOSE_SITE_RECREATE,

  PURPOSE_SITE_PASSTHRU,

  PURPOSE_SITE_OTHREASN,

  PURPOSE_SITE_BATHROOM,

  TIME_LEAVING_SITE,

  FROM_SAMERICA,

  FROM_OTH_COUNTRY,

  FROM_MEXICO,

  FROM_EUROPE,

  FROM_CANADA,

  FROM_ASIA,

  SERIALNUMBER,

  SCAN_HEADER,

  -DONT_KNOW_ZIP,

  Zip code

  WHY_ROUTE,

  REC_GFA,

  REGION_CODE,

  PURPOSE_GFA,

  PURPOSE_SITE,

  AGREE_TO_INTERVIEW,

  WHEN_LEAVE_GFA,

  WHEN_LEAVE_SITE,

  CLICK_START,

  AXLE_COUNT,

  DATAYEAR,

  FORM,

  ROUND,

  TYPESITE,

  AFOREST_CODE,

  INTERVIEW_DATE,

  -SITE_CN_FK,

  SUBUNIT,

  SITENUMBER,

  PURPOSE_GFA_WORKING,

  PURPOSE_GFA_RECREATE,

  PURPOSE_GFA_PASSTHRU,

  PURPOSE_GFA_OTHREASN,

  PURPOSE_GFA_BATHROOM,

  VPDUNIT_ID)

  SELECT ADMIN_CN,

  REGION_CODE,

  SUBSTR (PURPOSE_SITE_WORKING, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (PURPOSE_SITE_RECREATE, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (PURPOSE_SITE_PASSTHRU, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (PURPOSE_SITE_OTHREASN, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (PURPOSE_SITE_BATHROOM, 1, 1),

  TO_NUMBER (TO_CHAR (time_leaving_site, 'HH24MI')),

  SUBSTR (FROM_SAMERICA, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (FROM_OTH_COUNTRY, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (FROM_MEXICO, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (FROM_EUROPE, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (FROM_CANADA, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (FROM_ASIA, 1, 1),

  SERIALNUMBER,

  SCAN_HEADER,

  -SUBSTR (DONT_KNOW_ZIP, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (POSTAL CODE, 1, 5),

  WHY_ROUTE,

  SUBSTR (REC_GFA, 1, 1),

  PURPOSE_GFA,

  PURPOSE_SITE,

  SUBSTR (AGREE_TO_INTERVIEW, 1, 1),

  WHEN_LEAVE_GFA,

  WHEN_LEAVE_SITE,

  CLICK_START,

  AXLE_COUNT,

  DATAYEAR,

  FORM,

  ROUND,

  TYPESITE,

  AFOREST_CODE,

  INTERVIEW_DATE,

  -SITE_CN_FK,

  SUBUNIT,

  SITENUMBER,

  SUBSTR (PURPOSE_GFA_WORKING, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (PURPOSE_GFA_RECREATE, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (PURPOSE_GFA_PASSTHRU, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (PURPOSE_GFA_OTHREASN, 1, 1),

  SUBSTR (PURPOSE_GFA_BATHROOM, 1, 1),

  VPDUNIT_ID

  OF fy13_individual_data;

  But it STILL says the same error of size max.

  I don't understand why would it be otherwise when even... the substr command must ignore the characters of tail.  Isn't it?

  Thoughts on the alternatives?  All the lines seem to be the right size for me.

  Hello

  It seems that the postal code is the 16th column in the list INSERT, but scan_header is the 16th column in the SELECT clause.  ('SUBSTR (POSTAL code, 1, 5)' is the 17th column in the SELECT clause).

  Perhaps you forgot REGION_CODE in the list INSERT, or didn't want to include it in the SELECT clause.  It is, he is very suspicious to say:

  INSERT INTO FY13_NRN_ADMIN (ADMIN_CN, - column 1

  PURPOSE_SITE_WORKING, - column 2

  PURPOSE_SITE_RECREATE, - column 3

  ...

  SELECT ADMIN_CN, - column 1

  REGION_CODE, - column 2

  SUBSTR (PURPOSE_SITE_WORKING, 1, 1),-column 3

  ...

  as you do.

• Addition of virtual column: ORA-12899: value too large for column

  I am using Oracle 11g, OS Win7, SQL Developer
  
  I'm trying to add the virtual column to my test table, but get ORA-12899: value too large for column error. Here are the details.
  Can someone help me in this?
  

  CREATE TABLE test_reg_exp
  (col1 VARCHAR2(100));
  
  INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('ABCD_EFGH');
  INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('ABCDE_ABC');
  INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('WXYZ_ABCD');
  INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('ABCDE_PQRS');
  INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('ABCD_WXYZ');

  ALTER TABLE test_reg_exp
  ADD (col2 VARCHAR2(100) GENERATED ALWAYS AS (REGEXP_REPLACE (col1, '^ABCD[A-Z]*_')));
  
  SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column "COL2" (actual: 100, maximum: 400)
  12899. 00000 -  "value too large for column %s (actual: %s, maximum: %s)"
  *Cause:    An attempt was made to insert or update a column with a value
             which is too wide for the width of the destination column.
             The name of the column is given, along with the actual width
             of the value, and the maximum allowed width of the column.
             Note that widths are reported in characters if character length
             semantics are in effect for the column, otherwise widths are
             reported in bytes.
  *Action:   Examine the SQL statement for correctness.  Check source
             and destination column data types.
             Either make the destination column wider, or use a subset
             of the source column (i.e. use substring).

  When I try to, I get the correct results:
  

  SELECT col1, (REGEXP_REPLACE (col1, '^ABCD[A-Z]*_'))
  FROM test_reg_exp;

  Thank you.

  Yes, RP, it works if you give col2 size > = 400.

  @Northwest - could you please test the same w/o having a clause of regex in col2?
  I have a doubt about using a REGULAR expression in this case Dynamics col.

  Refer to this (might help) - http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/11g/virtual-columns-11gr1.php
  Below excerpt from above link... see if that helps...
  >
  Notes and restrictions on the virtual columns include:

  The indexes defined on the virtual columns are equivalent to a function-based index.
  Virtual columns can be referenced in the updates and deletions WHERE clause, but they cannot be manipulated by DML.
  The tables containing virtual columns may still be eligible for result caching.
  Functions in expressions must be deterministic when the table is created, but can then be recompiled and non-deterministic without for as much invalidate the virtual column. In such cases, the following steps must be taken after the function is recompiled:
  Constraint on the virtual column must be disabled and re-enabled.
  On the virtual column indexes must be rebuilt.
  Materialized views that access the virtual column must be fully refreshed.
  The result cache must be flushed if the virtual column acceded to the request (s).
  Statistical table must be regathered.
  The virtual columns are not supported for the organized and external object in index, cluster or temporary tables.
  The expression used in the virtual column definition has the following restrictions:
  It cannot refer to another virtual column by name.
  It can refer to the columns defined in the same table.
  If it refers to a deterministic user-defined function, it cannot be used as a partitioning key column.
  The result of the expression must be a scalar value. It cannot return that an Oracle supplied the data type, a type defined by the user, LOB or LONG RAW.
  >

  Published by: Vanessa B on October 16, 2012 23:48

  Published by: Vanessa B on October 16, 2012 23:54

• Storage spaces for different size tables

  Hello
  
  I have a situation that everyone has probably, so I would go into more detail about this.
  Working with databases with different objectives, a single OLTP and OLAP one another, the two tables with different sizes... some with 1 M, some with 100 M and others with 150 G or more.
  
  Recommendation of the Oracle, so the suite all storage spaces are created in the form of LMT, but I don't know if I can put something else to optimize performance, such as reading or writing, once the databases have different objectives and therefore with different behaviors.
  
  If someone could help me how I should give attention, I really appreciate.
  The version of database can be regarded as 10g and 11g.
  
  Thank you.
  
  Alex

  No, really no need to worry about direct allocation tablespace in realtion to the performance of the queries. There are some operations such as the allocation of file extensions and tablespace performance impact scope object, but it can be difficult to see this. Just make sure your expandable size of file on the data files extension is large enough so that the next object needing another measure will also not wait as the file expand. With the maximum of a measure in a size auto-allouer tablespace is 64 M, a volume of measure G 1 file would be 16 degrees of object so 15 additional objects may expand (at this size) before a another file extension becomes necessary.

  What to do is determine if you want to count automatic sur-affectation to manage measurement of object allocations or to use uniform extensions so that each measure in the tablespace is the same size. If you use uniform extensions then you must make a choice of the same size for all or separate objects in small object and object of large size tablespaces and use a different scale for each size. Maybe 512K for small and 8 M wide. It's just a matter of how you want to manage your tablespace usage and growth.

  HTH - Mark D Powell.

• Is it possible the reel with the variable column size?

  Hi, I'm queue to a CSV file with the following script (the SELECT real is different but similar, Oracle 10.2.0.3.0):
  

  SET COLSEP ';'
  SET FEEDBACK OFF
  SET LINESIZE 2000
  SET PAGESIZE 0
  SET TERMOUT OFF
  SET TRIMSPOOL ON
  SET VERIFY OFF
  
  SPOOL test.csv REPLACE
  
  SELECT 'COLUMN1', 'COLUMN2', 'COLUMN3' FROM dual UNION ALL
  SELECT 'value1', NULL, NULL FROM dual UNION ALL
  SELECT 'value2', NULL, NULL FROM dual;
  
  SPOOL OFF
  
  EXIT SUCCESS COMMIT

  Which produces the following output:
  

  COLUMN1;COLUMN2;COLUMN3
  value1 ;       ;
  value2 ;       ;

  Is it possible to get the following with the variable column size result
  

  COLUMN1;COLUMN2;COLUMN3
  value1;;
  value2;;

  I tried SET NULL "but I see no difference. Thanks in advance!
  
  Markus

  Hello

  SQL * Plus you button the output so that each column has a fixed length, which is exactly what you don't want.

  To get around this, concatenate all your data in a column VARCHAR2 fat with delimiters.

  For example, instead of

  SELECT    empno
  ,       ename
  ,       hiredate
  FROM       scott.emp
  ;
  

  Do something like

  SELECT    empno
  || ';' || ename
  || ';' || TO_CHAR (hiredate, 'DD-Mon-YYYY')
  FROM       scott.emp
  ;
  

• Value too large for column

  Hello
  
  I have a column with the varchar2 data type (500) next to oltp, I extract the data from this column and loading in another column of tables which has the same varchar2 data type (500)
  
  My problem: I get error with a value too large for column when I am trying to load data in certain folders. (I guess there is a problem of character format, if that's the case how to check characters for the data format)
  
  Help, please

  Do not forget that the 500 in varchar2 (500) specifies the size of the storage. This means that you have 500 bytes of storage.

  Which may depend on your default however nls_length_semantics: your statement is true semantics bytes but neither tank:

  SQL> select name, value  from sys.v_$parameter  where lower (name) like '%length%'
    2  /
  
  NAME                 VALUE
  -------------------- --------------------
  nls_length_semantics BYTE
  
  SQL>
  SQL> create table t (a varchar2 (500))
    2  /
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL>
  SQL> alter session set nls_length_semantics=char
    2  /
  
  Session altered.
  
  SQL>
  SQL> alter table t add b varchar2(500)
    2  /
  
  Table altered.
  
  SQL> desc t
   Name                                      Null?    Type
   ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
   A                                                  VARCHAR2(500 BYTE)
   B                                                  VARCHAR2(500)
  
  SQL>
  

• PIXMA MG8220 default page for printing size is out for 6 x 4, need to letter

  I have a PIXMA MG8220 and default page for printing size is out for 6 x 4, I need it to be paper letter size. I lose a lot of paper and cannot understand how to reset the default values on the individual mobile phones vs. using the printer printer?

  Simon

  Hi simonp.

  To set the size of paper to print on, please follow these steps:

  1. open an application such as TextEdit.

  2. Mount the file and select print or press CMD + P keys on your keyboard.

  3. Locate the PAPER SIZE field, and then select the format of LETTER paper.

  4 search drop-down list labeled PRESETS, then expand this menu and choose SAVE AS.

  5. enter a name of your choice for this setting by default, and then click OK.

  Now we can select the above created the preset in any application you are printing from, with the default paper size is letter.

  I hope this helps!

• When I try to copy a single file (for example: size of 1 GB) drive hard to any what external memory device via the USB port, the copy process takes several hours to complete

  I use a DELL Studio 15 laptop computer. When I try to copy a single file (for example: size of 1 GB) hard drive to any external memory device (for example: USB key or external hard drive) via the port USB, the copy process takes several hours to complete. I have checked the viruses using McAfee Antivirus, but could not find. Can someone suggest me a solution?

  Hello

  ·          Were there any changes made to your computer before this problem?

  Step 1: Format the external device to the NTFS format and check if the problem persists.

  See: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-vista/Convert-a-hard-disk-or-partition-to-NTFS-format

• I'm scanning in legal size docs. with my printer/scan/fax. The application of fax scan in windows 7 does not show an option to paper size for legal-size paper.

  I have a new HP with Windows 7.  I'm scanning in legal size docs. with my printer/scan/fax.  The application of fax scan in windows 7 does not show an option to paper size for legal-size paper.  I could do this on my old XP computer.  Microsoft forgot add parameters of legal size in this application?

  Hello notnewbee,

  Thanks for posting on the Microsoft answers Forum.

  You do not give the model of your printer/scanner/fax machine so I can't direct you to the website of the manufacturer of specifc. However, I would
  you go to the website of the manufacturer of your printer and download the latest drivers for Windows 7. Sometimes, if you use a driver that is not intended for your operating system, then your device can operate and install, but some features may not work.

  If they do not have an updated driver, then try the compatibility mode for Windows XP and see if your printer will work correctly.
  The information below will show you how you can make older programs run on Windows 7 here.

  If please reply back and let us know if this helps solve your problem or if you still need help.

  Sincerely,

  Marilyn
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think

• ORA-02374: error loading conversion table / ORA-12899: value too large for column

  Hi all.

  Yesterday I got a dump of a database that I don't have access and Production is not under my administration. This release was delivered to me because it was necessary to update a database of development with some new records of the Production tables.

  The Production database has NLS_CHARACTERSET = WE8ISO8859P1 and development database a NLS_CHARACTERSET = AL32UTF8 and it must be in that CHARACTER set because of the Application requirements.

  During the import of this discharge, two tables you have a problem with ORA-02374 and ORA-12899. The results were that six records failed because of this conversion problem. I list the errors below in this thread.

  Read the note ID 1922020.1 (import and insert with ORA-12899 questions: value too large for column) I could see that Oracle gives an alternative and a workaround that is to create a file .sql with content metadata and then modifying the columns that you have the problem with the TANK, instead of BYTE value. So, as a result of the document, I done the workaround and generated a discharge .sql file. Read the contents of the file after completing the import that I saw that the columns were already in the CHAR value.

  Does anyone have an alternative workaround for these cases? Because I can't change the CHARACTER set of the database the database of development and Production, and is not a good idea to keep these missing documents.

  Errors received import the dump: (the two columns listed below are VARCHAR2 (4000))

  ORA-02374: error loading «PPM» conversion table "" KNTA_SAVED_SEARCH_FILTERS ".

  ORA-12899: value too large for column FILTER_HIDDEN_VALUE (real: 3929, maximum: 4000)

  "ORA-02372: row data: FILTER_HIDDEN_VALUE: 5.93.44667. (NET. (UNO) - NET BI. UNO - Ambiente tests '

  . . imported "PPM". "' KNTA_SAVED_SEARCH_FILTERS ' 5,492 MB 42221 42225-offline

  ORA-02374: error loading «PPM» conversion table "" KDSH_DATA_SOURCES_NLS ".

  ORA-12899: value too large for column BASE_FROM_CLAUSE (real: 3988, maximum: 4000)

  ORA-02372: row data: BASE_FROM_CLAUSE: 0 X '46524F4D20706D5F70726F6A6563747320700A494E4E455220 '.

  . . imported "PPM". "' KDSH_DATA_SOURCES_NLS ' lines 229 of the 230 308.4 KB

  Thank you very much

  Bruno Palma

  Even with the semantics of TANK, the bytes for a column VARCHAR2 max length is 4000 (pre 12 c)

  OLA Yehia makes reference to the support doc that explains your options - but essentially, in this case with a VARCHAR2 (4000), you need either to lose data or change your data type of VARCHAR2 (4000) to CLOB.

  Suggest you read the note.

• Bind Peeking only for columns 'known '?

  Hi all

  We are working on our 11.2.0.3 database RAC (on AIX 7.1) to try to understand why a certain repeated (batch load) does not use the correct execution plan.

  The query itself looks like:

  Select the CATENTRY CATENTRY_ID where ((PARTNUMBER =: 1) GOLD ((0 =: 2) AND (PARTNUMBER IS NULL))) and ((MEMBER_ID =: 3) OR ((0 =: 4) AND (MEMBER_ID IS NULL)));

  This query is a query internal IBM Webshere, that is immutable.

  The table in question has an available on PARTNUMBER & MEMBER_ID index

  The execution plan looks like however

  The execution plan of the above statement looks like:

  Execution plan

  ----------------------------------------------------------

  0 SELECT optimizer Mode STATEMENT = ALL_ROWS (cost = 2038 card = 1 bytes = 23)

  1 0 TABLE ACCESS FULL WCSADMIN. CATENTRY (cost = 2038 card = 1 bytes = 23)

  Then a FTS scanning is used where expect an Index seek.

  The values passed to this application are for example:

  : 1 = XA-GOL-1068849

  : 2 = 1

  : 3 =-6000

  : 4 = 1

  With the part of the WHERE CLAUSE then having ((0=1) AND (PARTNUMBER IS NULL)) and ((0=1) and (MEMBER_ID IS NULL)) would be give rise to an Index seek.:

  Select

  catentry_id

  of catentry

  where ((partnumber = «XA-GED-5702810'))

  or ((0 = 1)

  "and (partnumber is null)))".

  and ((member_id = - 6000)

  or ((0 = 1)

  and (member_id is null)));

  Execution plan

  ----------------------------------------------------------

  0 SELECT optimizer Mode STATEMENT = ALL_ROWS (cost = 3 cards = 1 bytes = 23)

  1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID WCSADMIN 0. CATENTRY (cost = 3 cards = 1 bytes = 23)

  2 1 INDEX UNIQUE WCSADMIN SCAN. I0000064 (cost = 2 = 1 card)

  Somewhere in the analysis of the query optimizer does not have / use all of the information needed to determine the correct plan, although the trace file shows all the values are correctly captured

  I expect that the optimizer would be "PEEK" all the available variables to determine the best execution plan.

  It seems however that both binds to the "0 =: 2" and "0 =: 4"are not "read" and therefore not used, resulting in a full Table Scan as the PARTNUMBER IS NULL and MEMBER_ID IS NULL are not ignored. "

  Can someone confirm that binds only for columns ' existing/real' is to take a look?

  And is it configurable?

  Thank you

  FJ Franken

  It's an interesting question - at first glance, it seems that Adaptive cursor_sharing should be able to solve your problem.

  However, I think that the optimizer must produce a plan that will be THAT ALWAYS produces the correct result regardless of the actual values provided. Your application may require the optimizer to find rows where memberid and partnumber are null, and you index (probably) is not a required column in it then the only legal execution plan given that complete analysis.

  According to the relative frequency of values and the number of NULL values for each column, you may find that the generic solution (rather than the index only solution that you got for this specific request) is to create an index on (partnumber, member_id, 1) or (member_id, partnumber, 1) then the optimizer can use CONCATENATION to choose one of the two alternative ways.

  Concerning

  Jonathan Lewis

• When you create a PDF from a scanner, is there a way to set the default value for the size of 8.5 x 11 letter custom every time I make a PDF from a scanner?

  When you create a PDF from a scanner, is there a way to set the default value for the size of 8.5 x 11 letter custom every time I make a PDF from a scanner?

  Hi kevin7frg,

  You can go to "file > create > scanner > configure presets PDF»

  The dialog box that appears, you can choose 8.5 X 11 as the default width and height of PDF pages to scan.

  

  Hope that helps.

  Kind regards

  Ana Maria

• ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column

  I have a table.the structure is as below.

  SQL > desc IDSSTG. FAC_CERT;

  Name                                      Null?    Type

  ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------

  FAC_CERT_SK NOT NULL NUMBER (38)

  LOB_BYTE_CD_SK NUMBER (38)

  SRC_CRDTL_ID_STRNG VARCHAR2 (20)

  PROV_CRDTL_SK NOT NULL NUMBER (38)

  LAB_SPCL_TYP_CD_SK NUMBER (38)

  FAC_CERT_ID NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (20)

  DATE OF FAC_CERT_EFF_DT

  FAC_CERT_EFF_DT_TXT NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (10)

  DATE OF FAC_CERT_END_DT

  FAC_CERT_END_DT_TXT VARCHAR2 (10)

  UPDT_DT                                            DATE

  UPDT_DT_TXT VARCHAR2 (10)

  SS_CD NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (10)

  ODS_INSRT_DT NOT NULL DATE

  ODS_UPDT_DT NOT NULL DATE

  CREAT_RUN_CYC_EXEC_SK NOT NULL NUMBER (38)

  LST_UPDT_RUN_CYC_EXEC_SK NOT NULL NUMBER (38)

  LAB_SPCL_TYP_CD VARCHAR2 (10)

  LOB_BYTE_CD VARCHAR2 (10)

  BUS_PRDCT_CD VARCHAR2 (20)

  I need set the value of a column to a default value.

  SQL > alter table IDSSTG. FAC_CERT change (FAC_CERT_EFF_DT_TXT default, TO_DATE('01010001','MMDDYYYY'));

  ALTER table IDSSTG. FAC_CERT change (FAC_CERT_EFF_DT_TXT default, TO_DATE('01010001','MMDDYYYY'))

  *

  ERROR on line 1:

  ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column

  Please notify.

  Kind regards

  VN

  ALTER table IDSSTG. FAC_CERT change (default FAC_CERT_EFF_DT_TXT ' 01010001');