Differences of router QoS and ASA

Hi, I recently tested the QoS on an aid and 876 IPSEC tunnel and managed to limit participation effective and output rates using QoS on the router between two hosts.

This made me think to try it on a SAA. I tried this on a SAA without success, but he also says in aid, it cannot be applied to the 'exit '. Is there a difference in the implementation of QoS between a router and ASA?

Update - I had it at work but only when I use it all the traffic everything. If I select say 192.168.55.20-> all IT does rate limit.

outside_mpc list extended access permit ip host 192.168.55.20 all

class-map ROB_QOS (does not work)

corresponds to the outside_mpc access list

Class-map ROB_QOS (works)

match any

class-map inspection_default

match default-inspection-traffic

type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map

parameters

message-length maximum 512

Policy-map global_policy

class inspection_default

inspect the preset_dns_map dns

inspect the ftp

inspect h323 h225

inspect the h323 ras

inspect the rsh

inspect the rtsp

inspect esmtp

inspect sqlnet

inspect the skinny

inspect sunrpc

inspect xdmcp

inspect the sip

inspect the netbios

inspect the tftp

Policy-map Rob_Policy

class ROB_QOS

Police output fall in line-action 2000-100000

global service-policy global_policy

Rob_Policy service-policy inside interface

Rob_Policy service-policy to the outside interface

Maybe its not working now because you have NAT on this 192.168.55.0 IP range? You use any NAT for this subnet?

Concerning

Farrukh

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Difference between routing tables and publish

    Hello

    My understanding of a Routing Table and the Table to publish is:

    Routing table: it is used to select the different routes for a service based on the results of an XQuery expression in a stream of messages.

    Table to publish: it is used to select the service target according to the results of an XQuery Expression.

    The two seem to work quite similar, but I guess that in the option table to publish the service for a branch is called asynchronously.

    Is this good? There is another difference between the two options?

    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Thank you
    Priya.

    Re: compare routing action against action Service legend against action to publish?

    Same differences between publish and route should be applicable for the table in the publication and the routing table.

  • tunnel from site to site between router IOS and ASA

    I've combed through the configs on both sides of this tunnel 4 x now and the look of policies as they match. I applied the http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a0080094498.shtml note

    My crypto lsits access are good and my nat on the side of IOS are provided with a map of the route and look good. On the SAA traffic side on the side of the remote tunnel ASA is exempt from NAT. Each side already has a site to another tunnel configuration, so I added the appropriate lines to the existing cryptographic cards which include peers, transform set and match address 'access-list. The polcies crypto isakmp on both ends are compatible. I have attached some configs and debugs (from router IOS), but essentially the newspaper on the SAA starts with the phase 1 is complete and then routing not received notification message, no proposal chosen readings and then it goes to IKE lost the connection to a remote peer, connection, drop table correlator counterpart has failed, no match, the deletion and finally disconnected session reason lost service.

    Their other tunnel stay standing as well as the configuration of remote access vpn connection is good.

    I found a note that recommends checking any access security-list, so I removed the, but no luck, and a Cisco associated with a hub, but had a healthy logic

    Is displayed normally with the

    Cisco VPN 3000 correspondent

    message hub: no proposal

    Chosen (14). This is a result of the

    being host-to-host connections.

    The configuration of the router has the

    IPSec proposals ordered so that the

    proposal selected for the router

    with the access list, but not the

    peer. The access list has a larger

    network including the host that

    a cutting traffic.

    Make the router for this proposal

    hub to router connection

    first in line, so that it corresponds to the

    specific to the host first.

    but that didn't work either.

    Thank you

    Bill

    Bill,

    Take a look at this

    000610: * PCTime 10:42:15.094 Sep 27: ISAKMP: (2039): need XAUTH

    000611: * 10:42:15.094 PCTime sep 27: ISAKMP: node set 920927400 to CONF_XAUTH

    000612: * 27 sep 10:42:15.094 PCTime: ISAKMP/xauth: application XAUTH_USER_NAME_V2 attribute

    000613: * 27 sep 10:42:15.094 PCTime: ISAKMP/xauth: application XAUTH_USER_PASSWORD_V2 attribute

    000614: * 27 sep 10:42:15.094 PCTime: ISAKMP: (2039): launch peer 74.92.97.166 config. ID = 920927400

    000615: * 27 sep 10:42:15.094 PCTime: ISAKMP: (2039): lot of 74.92.97.166 sending peer_port my_port 4500 4500 (R) CONF_XAUTH

    -Other - 000616: * PCTime 10:42:15.094 Sep 27: ISAKMP: (2039): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_COMPLETE

    000617: * PCTime 10:42:15.094 Sep 27: ISAKMP: (2039): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_XAUTH_REQ_SENT

    It should not go to extend the authentication. Since you have the client and the L2L on the same router and clients are configured for Extended authentication, the router will ask for XAUTH unless you configure the "No.-xauth" command after the pre-shared key

    Please implement the command:

    ISAKMP crypto keys in clear text address 74.92.97.166 No.-xauth

    Thank you

    Gilbert

  • IPsec VPN site to site between router problem Cisco ASA. Help, please

    Hello community,

    I'm stuck in configuring VPN site to site between ASA (OS 9.1) and router Cisco IOS (IOS 15, 2 - 4.M4)

    Attachment is router configuration and ASA. I also include the router debug output.

    It seems that the two parties must isakmp missmatch configuration, but I have already disabled the KeepAlive parameters. I also turn off PFS setting on both sides. But it does not work. I have no idea on this problem.

    Please help me. Any help appreciated.

    Thank you

     
     

    I didn't look any further, but this may be a reason:

     crypto map mymap 1 ipsec-isakmp dynamic dyn1 

    The dynamic CM must always be the last sequence in a card encryption:

     no crypto map mymap 1 ipsec-isakmp dynamic dyn1 crypto map mymap 65000 ipsec-isakmp dynamic dyn1

    Try this first, then we can look further.

  • What is the difference between call queues and priority routing?

    and what is the difference between routing based on skills and the basic skills of routing?

    Suite...

    Priority Queuing - Set Priority step can be used to assign a priority (1-10), or increase / decrease. This allows for a given

    Contact (eg. calling) to priority over higher/lower than the other contacts that are in the same queue. In other words, the contact

    priority for all s CSQ for which he is put on hold. In the script, you must use priority defined stage to assign a higher priority or less in Call Queuing.

    Check the following URL, which described on stage "Set priority" to the title of the palette "CIM step Description.

    http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/voice/sw_ap_to/apps_3_1/English/admn_app/step_ref/ICD.htm

  • IPSEC with the router and asa 5510

    Hi all

    I have problems connecting ipsec l2l. I have set up a router and asa 5510 make ipsec between them, but it seems to fail on the phase 1. I already check and I am 100% sure that is the key. You can a few shed light on the issue, I have. Here's the output debug I get the two system.

    Thank you

    Hello

    Isakmp policy match on both devices? What version of ios is running on the router and the asa5510

    Thank you

  • EIGRP running between the router and ASA by switch

    Hello

    Is that possible I can running an EIGRP between router and ASA by switch?

    Router and ASA connected to the switch with static route.

    Hi Tommy Chin.

    It is possible, we must advertise to the route between the router and ASA.

    Please provide your connectivity diagram to better explain.

    For example...

    interface GigabitEthernet0/0

    Description links to WAN router

    nameif OUTSIDE

    security-level 50

    IP 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.192 ensures 10.1.1.2

    Summary-address eigrp 100 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 1

    !

    Confiuration Protocol EIGRP

    standard access list eigrpACL_FR allow a

    !

    Router eigrp 100

    eigrpACL_FR distribute-list in the interface outside

    neighbor 10.1.1.3 OUTSIDE interface

    neighbor 10.1.1.2 OUTSIDE interface

    Network 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.192

    redistribute connected

    redistribute static

    !

    Kind regards

    Srinivas.

    Note: if it solves your problem it mark it as resolved.

  • VPN between 878 router and ASA 5505

    Hello world

    I struggled for a few days now to get a VPN connection works.

    The situation

    Two offices needs to be connected to eachother with a VPN. The two parties have a WAN connection.

    The tunnel between locations rises very well but the communication fails in almost any way.

    The host cannot ping each other and also the inside of the router and ASA pings fail.

    The only ping works is from inside Site2 to the inside interface of the router side 1 (192.168.1.100 to 192.168.0.250)

    NAT works very well on both sites behind the router / asa.

    I think I'm doing something wrong with the roads or access lists but after 7 days, many refills, restores, driving from one end of the State to the other to reset stupid moves break and resolder my cable from the console and things completely with default start for 10 times, I'm through, I honestly don't know where to look for more...

    Tech Specs:

    Site1: has a cable modem that gives a WAN IP with DHCP address

    This modem connects to the Cisco 878 (Fastethernet0) router

    The router acts as a DHCP server and NAT gateway for the office and offers vpn connectivity to the other office

    Site2: has a cable-modem/router (Cisco 3925), which made the NAT, this modem/router gives an IP private class-C (192.168.178.x)

    This modem/router connects to a Cisco ASA 5505 (Fastethernet0)

    The ASA also server as a DHCP server and NAT gateway for the office and offers vpn connectivity to the other office.

    Online, it looks like this:

    Office 1--> Cisco878--> WAN Cloud<---cablemodemrouter><--- asa5505=""><--- office="">

    IP address ranges:

    Office 1

    Network 192.168.0.0

    Subnet mask 255.255.255.0

    Gateway 192.168.0.250

    IP WAN XXXX

    Office 2

    Network 192.168.1.0

    Subnetmak 255.255.255.0

    Gateway 192.168.1.1

    IP WAN XXXX

    On the location of office 2, there is a NAT between ASA and WAN router. between 192.168.178.x 255.255.255.0

    The modemrouter is a Cisco 3925, on which IPSEC passthrough is enabled.

    Configs:

    Site 1:

    CISCO 878 router

    Site 2

    ASA 5505

    I hope someone has a chance to look through my config and tell me what I did wrong this week

    Even if you can not help me but still read here: Thank YOU!

    (As my problem has been resolved, I removed the configs of this post. If for any reason, you want to work for these devices configuration, please send me a PM)

    Post edited by: taaa lijf - reason: problem solved, removed configs and stuff private for obvious reasons ;)

    Hello

    Ping client customer site 1 site2 and make sh crypto isakmp his and sh crypto ipsec his on the router.

    If sh crypto isakmp gives QM_Idle and ping fails and you have no package in the HS cypto ipsec his and then do a debug crypto ipsec

    If sh crypto isakmp gives MM_NoState can do a debug crypto isakmp

    One note however, you should have ip addresses static at least on the side, initiating the tunnel, otherwise it will not work when ip address changes.

    Kind regards.

    Alain.

  • Difference between "Home network" and "Business Network" WITHOUT a domain name in Windows 7?

    I'm paranoid and always try to choose security options more high.  In preparation for the implementation of a small Windows 7 network behind a NAT router wireless and wired, I'm working through "Microsoft Windows 7 in depth" by Cowart and Knittel (what, rights of copyright 2010).  I fell right on the following steps (mentioned verbatim in p. 446-447), that I don't understand.  (The steps are clear enough but the real difference between the first two choices is not.) :

    «.. . Click on change settings, click Network ID...  You are prompted to select the option that best describes your computer:

    • This computer belongs to a network of business; I use it to connect to other computers at work.
    • This computer is a computer at home; It is not part of a corporate network.

    «That one you choose made a significant difference...»  If you choose the option "Business Network", Windows configures your computer for a better level of security it will be for domestic use [my underlining].  The wizard then asks you choose one of the following responses:

    • My company uses a network with a domain name
    • My company uses a network without a domain name

    «.. . If you build your own network as described in this chapter, select a field, then click Next.  The last question asks a name for the network working group.  Leaving the WORKING group by default in place".

    It seems that you can set up a "Business Network" 'without a domain' that outward behaves as a similar "home network".  If Yes, what is this 'higher standard of security' that will result? -JCW2

    There is only one difference between home network and profiles work that appears when you sign in for the 1st time.

    A profile of home network allows to create or join a homegroup, on a job profile that you can not. So what it means actually using the term "business" is false and the differences in security are limited.

    One of the limitations of a workgroup can access one action requires the credentials of all users to set up on the host pc, setting up a homegroup automatically creates a common user between computers that could be considered a low security setting...

  • Interfaces of AIM - SSM and ASA 5510

    All, someone can explain if and how routing works between the ASA and the map of the IPS?

    (1) is the single NIC in the card IPS management purposes only?

    (2) is the IP address configured in the process of installing the card for that one NIC?

    (3) should it have no routing between for example the management of the ASA or any other interface and card management interface or can they reside on completely separate networks?

    Thank you

    Jonathan

    Map of the IPS has 3 interfaces.

    The management interface is an external interface that you plug a network cable in. The IP address is configured by the user during installation.

    Sniffing is the internal interface of data backplane ASA. No IP address is never assigned to this interface.

    Interface control plan is an internal control ASA management interface, so that the SAA can communicate internally to the SSM (the session command runs through this interface). The IP address of the control plan is controlled by the ASA and not user configurable,

    The management interface's management only.

    The IP address that is configured during installation is only for this management interface.

    Regarding the routing between the ASA and the SSM, it's completely up to the user.

    All communications from the ASA to the SSM are made internally through interface control plan and therefore the SAA itself has no need to know how to communicate on the SSM management IP.

    The SSM, however, must communicate from IP management is one of the ASA interfaces to Shunning/blocking on the SAA. Shunning/blocking is not through the control plan.

    When you use IDM or ASDM for configuration as java Web applet access to DFS management IP so the computer that runs the IDM or ASDM must be on the local network of the MSS management port, or routable network.

    Some scenarios:

    (1) only one machine (IDS MC/s LUN) communicating with the SSM. In this scenario, you could take a crossover cable and connect directly one machine to the MSS.

    The SSM can communicate only on this computer into one.

    (2) a secure network to manage security devices that is NOT routable from the other networks.

    In this scenario the box management, DFS management port and the management of the ASA port would be all placed in a network.

    The SSM would be able to communicat with the box management and the ASA management port.

    The ASA management port is configured as a management only for the ASA port will not route input/output of the management network.

    While management on this local network zone can communicate with the SSM, and no distance box cannot connect directly to the SSM.

    (NOTE: blocking/Shunning will work here because the SSM can speak to the ASA)

    (3) a secure network which IS routable from the other networks.

    Similar to option 2 above, but in this case the ASA management port is configured to NOT be a 'single management' port and is instead treated as any other port on the firewall. In this configuration, the management port of the ASA CAN road entrance/exit to the management network.

    NOTE: In most cases the ASA will need to configure a NAT for the SSM management IP address if users want to connect on the SSM management IP remotely from the Internet (such as running ASDM of the main network of the company on the internet to set up the SAA and the SSM on a remote site)

    (4) SSM management IP on one of the normal networks behind the ASA. In this screenplay DFS management port would be connected to a switch or a hub where other internal machines are connected (like jumping in the DMZ switch / vlan). The ASA point of view of the management port SSM would be treated as any other web and ssh server behind the firewall.

  • Cisco 2911 and ASA 5512 remove double NAT

    Greetings,

    I have 2 subnets on Cisco 2911 router

    192.168.3.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24

    3rd network 192.168.4.0/24 is natting internal interface to the modem for internet access. creating 2 NAT (NAT in router) and NAT in Modem

    I just bought Cisco ASA 5512, no chance I could remove the Cisco 2911 router NAT and set the default gateway for Cisco ASA?

    Yes you are right...

    You must ensure that you get the routed LAN traffioc to hit inside the interface ASA in ASA, you can do PAT/NAT to access...

    Concerning

    Knockaert

  • What is the difference between Unicast RPF and Reverse Path Forwarding?

    I am confused between Unicast RPF and Reverse Path Forwarding function.

    What is the difference between Unicast RPF and Reverse Path Forwarding?

    Because they have all two please check the address of the source of each package before sending it to the destination too?

    Reverse Path Forwarding is used only when the network want to build a tree shared multicast communication and then we must use Unicast RPF after creation of the shared tree?

    The mechanism of the RPF is mainly used to ensure no loop of routing traffic.

    As you probably already read, it does by ensuring that his route to the source address of a packet received is accessible via the same interface that the packet is entered in the. Think of the notion of "root port" in STP. all root ports are similar to the root, sunflower follow the Sun. Therefore, it is naturally a loop prevention mechanism.

    With multicast traffic, it is quite likely to create multiple loops of routing the nature of 'destination' traffic. For this reason, using a mechanism as the RPF to ensure you are on the "road to the root" (to say) to the source originating multicast traffic. Otherwise if you're not then you either receive this traffic route in a loop, or a suboptimal path.

    uRPF works essentially the same way, except that it is done for unicast traffic instead. Now with unicast traffic your flow is from a source and directs to a single destination. Given that, as the fact that you are using a dynamic routing algorithm (which allows to select the path to a destination), you can have loops of your network for unicast traffic flow routing; of course there may be exceptions to pitfalls of configuration route redistribution.

    However RPF when it is applied to traffic unicast can add another advantage, and it's verification IP source. That's why we can use it as a security mechanism to ensure that data are from where it is supposed to come.

    On the limit of the L2, you then have mechanisms such as guard source IP to ensure that the correct host is not usurpation of their IP address.

    By analogy RPF can be used for checking at source for multicast traffic, and it is intrinsically that however, the most important role is so that it can be used to guarantee without loop routing of multicast traffic.

    I hope that helped clear things upwards and not confused you any more with all this.

  • Installation of site to site VPN IPSec using PIX and ASA

    / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

    I am a site configuration to site IPSec VPN using a PIX515E to site A and ASA5520 to Site B.

    I have attached the lab diagram. Consider PIX and ASA are in default configuration, which means that nothing is configured on both devices.

    According to the scheme

    ASA5520

    External interface is the level of security 11.11.10.1/248 0

    The inside interface is 172.16.9.2/24 security level 100

    Default route is 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 11.11.10.2 1

    PIX515E

    External interface is the level of security 123.123.10.2/248 0

    The inside interface is 172.16.10.1/24 security level 100

    Default route is 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 123.123.10.1 1

    / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

    Could someone tell me how to set up this configuration? I tried but didn't workout. Here is the IKE protocol I have used.

    IKE information:

    IKE Encrytion OF

    MD5 authentication method

    Diffie Helman Group 2

    Failure to life

    IPSEC information:

    IPsec encryption OF

    MD5 authentication method

    Failure to life

    Please enter the following command

    on asa

    Sysopt connection permit VPN

    on pix not sure of the syntax, I think it is

    Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

    What we are trying to do here is basically allowing vpn opening ports

    Alternatively you can open udp 500 and esp (or port ip 50) out to in on the two firewalls

  • ASA 5505 and ASA 5510 Site to Site VPN Tunnel cannot be established

    Hi all experts

    We are now plan to form an IPSec VPN tunnel from site to site between ASA 5505 (ASA Version 8.4) and ASA 5510 (ASA Version 8.0) but failed, would you please show me how to establish? A reference guide?

    I got error syslog 713902 and 713903, how to fix?

    I got the following, when I type "sh crypto isakmp his."

    Type: user role: initiator

    Generate a new key: no State: MM_WAIT_MSG2

    Hugo

    Hello

    This State is reached when the policies of the phase 1 do not correspond to the two ends.

    Please confirm that you have the same settings of phase 1 on both sides with the following commands:

    See the isakmp crypto race

    See the race ikev1 crypto

    Also make sure that port UDP 500 and 4500 are open for communication between your device and the remote peer.

    Finally, make sure you have a route suitable for the remote VPN endpoint device.

    Hope that helps.

    Kind regards

    Dinesh Moudgil

  • What is the difference between codec primary and secondary codec in cts-3000?

    Hello

    I'm a novice on telepresence. This community is only a place to resolve issues for me.

    What is the difference between codec primary and secondary codec in cts-3000?

    I know the primary function of the codec. but I don't know exactly of secondary function of codec.

    Help me please.

    Hello

    On a CTS 3000 system, you have 1 codec primary and secondary 2 codecs. Secondary codecs are responsible for the camera left and right and view the connections. They communicate the main codec via an Ethernet cable.

    Here is a guide to the installation of a CTS-3000 so that you can see the routing of cables.

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/Telepresence/cts_3000/guide/3000_assembly_guide/CH08_Routing_Power_and_Signal_Cables.html

    In addition, if you are interested to learn more about the telepresence as of last year, Cisco introduced the video CCNA certification track. Maybe it's something you are interested in.

    https://learningnetwork.Cisco.com/community/certifications/ccna_video

    PEI

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I add a club membership e-mail addresses without cluttering my personal e-mail address?

    I need regularly correspond by e-mail with members of a club, that I belong. I would like to keep their addresses in a separate account that do not clutter my personal e-mail address. Is this possible and if so, please provide advice on how to implem

  • Retrieving messages

    Is it possible to retrieve a message that you wrote on a web page that has been accidentally closed or crashed? It's so boring. You spend ages you compose a message on a web page and go to press on send and then there is an error and the message is l

  • Convert the scanned PDF to JPEG

    Scanned a photo that has been put into PDF format by printer and/or Adobe Reader. How can I get my HP8500 all-in-one printer for scanning in JPeg or how to convert a PDF file to JPEG? Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

  • Why the Flight Simulator stops after 20 min or so?

    Why flight simulator x stop working after 20 minutes or so...

  • OEM disc more than once?

    I have an OEM Windows 7 disc. I used it for the windows in bootcamp on a MacBook which I no longer use Windows on more. I have coins to come so I can build my brother a computer this week. I'll be able to use this drive I have and the key that came w