Discovers the connection / Security Server Tunneling issue

Similar Questions

• vROPS for issue of Horizon is seeking the connection Broker server configured

  I'm trying to set up vROPs view of the Horizon.   I configured the adapter to view of the skyline of vROPS with the ID 1 adapter.

  I have install the agent broke of vROPS view of the Horizon on one of my servers to connect (this Conn server is associated with a security server, the other is internal only).  I try to set up and whenever I'm denied.  The search in the log file I see this:

  Exception in ViewAPILogon details follow: ViewAPILogon failed because credentials broker null or empty

  I have changed the pairing key in the key of vROPs with different keys view adapter and still get the same message

  In vROPs regulatory policy I get the Horizon company by key (300) concurrent user in vROPs of license of the Horizon.

  I associate license groups according to the doc:

  vRealize Documentation Center of Operations Manager 6.0.1

  A final potential problem: the connection to the server is running in a different vCenter that is associated with vROPs view adapter (login server is in vCenter management and desktop computers are in vCenter VDI)

  Any help would be appreciated.

  -MattG

  It was FW rules.  Necessary to open ports in vROPs:

  http://www.carlstalhood.com/VMware-vrealize-operations-for-horizon/#configurebrokeragent

• Discovers the connection Server 5.2 upgrade error "user lacks sufficient privileges.

  Yesterday, I posted a problem I had with the upgrade of the composer, which has now been resolved. The next step is the upgrade of the connection to the server, but I ran into an issue here as well. When running the executable of 5.2, I receive an error message regarding the user's permissions. The message I get is:

  "The currently logged-on user has sufficient privileges on the existing instance of Directory Services. Please log in as a user with administrator display rights and then try to use this facility. "(screenshot attached)

  I am connected to 2 k 8 R2 Server under an account that has Local Admin and Admin View Doman Admin privileges. By examining the log file for the installation to fail, I noticed these lines toward the end:

  ...

  serverInstUtil: 04/04/13 10:30:46 DN = or = Groups, dc = vdi, dc is vmware, dc = int
  serverInstUtil: 04/04/13 10:30:46 LDAP search failed - 32 (No Such Object).
  serverInstUtil: 04/04/13 10:30:46 ERROR: the user does not have administrator display on the LDAP instance existing rights.
  serverInstUtil: 04/04/13 10:30:48 end Logging

  ...

  It tries to authenticate with some local LDAP, rather than the internal LDAP protocol that we have specified during installation. Is this a normal behavior?

  I've never had a problem with the upgrade so that it is not a question of privileges display in your environment. Permissions for domain users are managed by the local instance of LDAP (AD LDS - formerly called ADAM) on the view connection server.

  When you installed the server to connect to the view you specified the domain user (or group) who has the full right to the environment from the view. You also have the option of specifying that all users of Windows local administrators to have full rights to view you want. By administrator-display, you can later add (or remove) more people having this right.

  Even if you are connected to the server as a user with domain administrator rights, this user does not have administrator display rights and that is why you get the error message. You can check by logging in under this same user administrator mode and see if you have the full right of the display.

  Mark

• Windows XP SP3 with view Client 5.1: unable to connect: discovers the connection connection to the server has failed

  Hi guys,.

  I need help.  I have a problem with my opinion of Client on a Windows XP SP3 computer.  When I click on connect, I get the following message immediately:

  "Failed to connect to the view connection server. Verify that the server connection mode address and network settings are correct. »

  A few details:

  My client's IP address is on the same subnet as the view connection server

  There is no firewall and DNS solves the login server see very well.  Here is the output of my customer's orders

  C:\ > nslookup X.X.X.172

  < resolves very well >

  C:\ > nslookup dd - view.viewdomain.com

  < resolves very well >

  C:\ > nslookup dd-notice

  < resolves very well >

  C:\ > tracert X.X.X.172

  < works great >

  If I open a browser on the XP workstation which is a failure, I can go to https://dd-view.viewdomain.com.  It displays the page that I need to connect with View Client. What do I think, so this should check the connectivity between the two.

  I've seen customer 5.1.0 build-704644 installed on my Windows XP SP3 client computer

  My connection to the server is running 5.1.1 build-799444 and is configured with a pool of offices 25 clone related with SSL active

  LAST IMPORTANT NOTE: I have the same version of the Client view (5.1.0 build-704644) installed on another Windows 7 workstation on the same subnet and it connects to my view connection server office pool very well.

  I tried to install the three versions of the customer view of this system of XP SP3 including the latest version, when the connection after installation, they all fail the same way. My body needs to function. The client machines can not move to something more recent to Windows XP SP3 because I am not the administrator for them.

  Any ideas?  Is this a bug or is Windows XP SP3 just not supported with view 5.1?

  VR,

  Brian Whyte

  Political of McAffee HBSS blocked 443 attempts out of the customer to view.

  The difference is that the Windows 7 machine that worked was becoming another policy HBSS applied to what was not blocking attempts.

• View Security Server installation issue 5.2

  I try to get my security server upward and running for 2 days now and continues to run into a brick wall.  I always get the following error:

  Error 28083.  Failed installation of IPsec. Please see the C:\users\...\...\vminst.log file for more details.  The journal reveals 'error: could not get a satisfactory response from the connection to the server after the installation of IPsec "

  In an effort to solve the problem, I welcomed the Windows Firewall on the Security Server and the connection to the server to allow all incoming connections.

  I checked that all the Back-End firewall configurations are correct and functioning as required.

  I scrolls http://communities.vmware.com/thread/405121?start=15 & tstart = 0 and made the changes recommended in this thread.

  When I remove completely all GPOS from the connection to the server, then I can successfully create the pairing between the server security and the connection to the server.

  Most of the people looks like it's a start for GPO setting to walk through them.  Well, I have several GPO that is applied in order to be compliant STIG.

  What I'm looking for is, can someone please point me in the right direction as to what the parameters might affect IPsec communication between the 2 boxes?

  Thanks for the help.

  After calling and by opening a ticket with VMware, it seems that I was able to successfully install the Security server.  After they looked through different GPO settings several that have been applied, I changed the setting below and has been able to correctly install after you run gpupdate/force on my login server.

  Options Configuration/policies/Windows Settings / Security Settings / Local Policies/Security / Cryptography system system cryptography: Use FIPS compatible algorithms for encryption, hashing, and signing

  My setting has been activated.  I changed it to disabled and it seemed to solve the current problem.

• Windows 8 on Vmware discovers 'the connection to the remote computer has ended. "

  Hello world

  I have problems connecting with VMware view
  I installed windows 7 and tested fine. But Windows8 x 64 is not allowed.

  The virtual machine is available on the server of the view state. pls see attached snapshot. When I try to connect to via the customer discovers my session disconnects after a few seconds with a warning "the end of the connection to the remote computer.

  When I check the console vcenter process, it seems that the user connects with no problems. But customer does not display anything and disconnects.

  what I've done so far:
  -Tried both RDP and PcOIP connections
  -Removed and reinstalled the client
  -Remove the agent from the view and reinstall client
  -Server view rebooted
  -There is no open Firewall. I'm on the same subnet
  -increases the size of memory for video display.
  -everything restarted.
  -Check the dns settings, seems to be ok.
  -removed from the field and added.

  Infra:
  ESX 5.1.0 799733
  See 5.1.2
  View customer: 5.2.1 build 937772
  VMware-viewcomposer - 3.0.0 - 691993

  I search around forums but cannot find an excat answer to this question.
  Any help much appreciated. Thank you all

  The complete list of the supported operating systems see 5.1 Agent is shown on page 15 of the installation guide - http://pubs.vmware.com/view-51/topic/com.vmware.ICbase/PDF/view-51-installation.pdf - see the section on operating systems supported for Agent view.

  You will find information on this forum of the people who got 8 windows work and to avoid the "black screen" "the connection to the remote computer has ended", but note that it is not taken in charge with Discover 5.1.x.

  Mark

• Discovers the connection Broker (the same external and internal DNS) URL

  I am trying to determine if its possible to connect internal broker who resolves internal view.compay.com (10.1.1.10) and say a security server located in the DMZ that resolves itself into view.company com (199.10.10.10).  Is it possible to keep this view.company.com for both?  At the moment we just solve internally to desktops.company.com, but I am trying to determine how it would be possible to use the same in both.

  You can have the will of the URL to the same name.    We have our internal DNS pointing to the name company.view.com and then from outside company.view.com resolves to our security server.

• Firefox keeps asking for an update, but is unable to complete. It is stuck on the "Connecting to Server" and turns for hours until I stop. Help!

  I have a version of Mac OS X 10.5.8 and I used Firefox on it since I got it 3 years (?). The most recent update for Firefox and Thunderbird guard invites me, but when I say 'yes' to update, a bar with lines moving through it, and he said: "Connecting to the update server", but it is never a more far. I left for hours at a time and it does actually update or another program.

  If you have problems with the update then more simple is to download the full version and trash the version currently installed to do a clean install of the new version.

  Download a new copy of the Firefox program and save the file on the desktop DMG

  • Firefox 4.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
  • Firefox 3.6.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
  • Trash the present application Firefox to do a clean (re-) install
  • Install the new version you downloaded

  Your profile data is stored in the Firefox profile folder, so you will not lose your bookmarks and other personal data.

• Bytes of TCP IP and subset of bytes for the connection of server and clients

  Hello

  I have a problem on the server and the client connection using the TCP/IP protocol. In the client, I have 41 cases, 1 case of timeout, others are for the case of button when they are pressed and then the LED on the server will be to market and if a click again the led will be off. But when I reached cases 10, 11, 12 up to the 41 (key case), that the LED lights if you click only once, but when he double clicked then the light does not turn off. So, how you solve the problem? Is this subset or bytes to read because the first subset is 1 case but no 10 to 41 will not work, but I change the subset in 2 then the case works for don't light the LED, but it do not work to turn the LED off.

  I also download the vi in this for reference.

  the user name for the client is the user and the password is pass.

  Thank you

  Hi ican.

  you have not changed the customer. See the attached picture. The error in the server side, it's that the 4 was connected on the two functions of split to the length. See Server for the necessary difference image.

  Mike

• Why my download of Creative Cloud box keep saying and is stuck on the "connect to Server"?

  I just bought a pack of cigarettes and of course in order to download the applications I need to have creative Cloud. Creative cloud has been download/load on my laptop ASUS for 15-20 minutes and is still stuck on the first 5% and says "connection to the server. Surely no time this this or is their a problem on my side?

  log out and then back to your office of cc with the help of the adobe id to subscribe, sign, sign in | Creative Office Cloud app

  If you always connect after that, sign, activation, or connection errors. CS5.5 and later

• How the customer views initiates the connection to the broker?

  Only the customer view to connect directly to the time the broker for connections and for the desktop is always the case in View 5?  Can someone explain the process?  Points will be awarded for all responses, thanks!

  The client initiates the connection http with ssl (port 443) to make the initial connection and authentication.

  The user then selects a pool of offices, depended on its installation traffic how each tunnel by the broker for the connections (Security Server) on the desktop.

  Depends on if the display protocol is RDP or PCoIP or it will be on port 3389 4172 but they can both be in the tunnel if the connection to the server or directly on the desktop.

  Linjo

• 4.6 Server issues matching connection security

  Hi all

  We use 4.6.

  Is the only way to associate a server with another server of connection security for uninstall security server software, remove the Console from the administrator of the view security server, and then reinstall specifying the desired login server?

  Is it possible for two security servers to be paired with the same login server at the same time?  Thinking through what I do, maybe I need to have this scenario for a little while.

  Finally, if I want clients that connect through one of my servers to connect to establish their sessions RDP and PCoIP directly with the Office of the VDI, after authentication, etc., do I just need to uncheck the boxes on the configuration of this server connection who say "Secure usage on the desktop connection Tunnel" and "Use Secure Gateway of PCoIP PCoIP connections to desktop"?

  Thanks for any help!

  Steve

  The Security server is matched during the installation process if you need to reinstall in order to re pair the SS with a broker for connections.  You can also have several SS paired with a single connection broker.

  Yes, unchecking the boxes would cause a direct connection.

  http://KB.VMware.com/kb/1010795

• Cannot "connect as current user" via the Security Server

  Hello community,

  I had a problem using the "connect as current user" option against a network outside of the enterprise security server. Connection by manually keying in the name of user and password works very well from the outside the company network For internal connections using a connection to the server instead of security server, everything works as expected without having to manually type the name of user and password.

  Single domain

  Customer of the horizon is 3.5.2 and joined to a domain

  2 Security Server 6.2.1 x

  2 Server 6.2.1 connection x

  On one of the servers of connection I got the following error message when you try to connect through the horizon customer using the option "connection as the current user:

  2015 12-28 T 20: 21:15.207 + 01:00 INFO (B 0, 08 - 0E34) < ajp-nio-8009-exec-7 > [PAEContext] (SESSION: a774_ * _b2fb) Idle Timer executor by using 1 thread (s)

  2015 12-28 T 20: 21:15.625 + 01:00 ERROR (0744-0AEC) < MessageFrameWorkDispatch > [ws_winauth] [GSSApiProcessServerContext]: negotiate failed. Error 0 x 0000000080090300 (not enough memory is available to complete this form) {SESSION: a774_ * _b2fb}

  2015 12-28 T 20: 21:15.626 + 01:00 (B 0, 08-04 B 8) WARN < ajp-nio-8009-exec-8 > [GssapiHandler] (SESSION: a774_ * _b2fb) failed connection GSSAPI: not enough memory is available to complete this application

  2015 12-28 T 20: 21:15.627 + 01:00 ERROR (B 0, 08-04 B 8) < ajp-nio-8009-exec-8 > [GssapiHandler] (SESSION: a774_ * _b2fb) cannot close the context 7 36 d-*-00D 3 with the error: unable to locate the context requested

  2015 12-28 T 20: 21:15.627 + 01:00 ERROR (B 0, 08-04 B 8) < ajp-nio-8009-exec-8 > [GssapiAuthFilter] (SESSION: a774_ * _b2fb) authenticate GSSAPI performance problem - GSSAPI_ERROR: GSSAPI failed: not enough memory is available to complete this application

  The connection to the server has 12 GB of memory in total and 9.5 GB of memory free/available.

  In the windows event log, the following error message appears:

  BROKER_USER_AUTHFAILED_GENERAL

  Failed to authenticate the user < UNAUTHENTICATED >

  Attributes:

  Node = hostnameofconnectionsserver.mydomain.com

  Gravity = AUDIT_FAIL

  Time = Mon 28 Dec 19:51:16 THIS 2015

  Module = broker

  UserDisplayName = < UNAUTHENTICATED >

  Source = com. VMware.VDI.Broker.filters.GssapiAuthFilter

  Recognized = true

  Just tried from a machine arrived in the area via the Security server. Cannot open a session as the current user. We also enabled on the external connections of MFA, but I don't think that should make a difference.

• Not able to connect with the Security Server

  Hello

  IM setting up a demo with view 6 environment, and when I try to connect locally on the servers of connection it works fine, but when I try to connect to the Security server fails with the image below.

  

  The Security server has 2 network cards, now in the DMZ and in production. I guess I should also be able to connect directly to the ip production, but the same error.

  We have disabled the firewall between dmz and prod for troubleshooting, but same problem.

  The image below is the Security Server, the addresses here are the ip 'internet', I guess it's true?

  

  The image below is the connection to server 1, the addresses here are internal, and is the FULL domain name, if it was "internet ip" instead?

  

  If I try on the spot to connect to the ip address of prod on security with internet server explorer, im able to connect, but when I select the office that it will fail "cannot display this page", then shows the 'internet' ip in the address field.

  I guess there is just something simple I've missed... hope you understand my question

  Thanks for the support.

  If you do not already have a look at this description of the display configuration, it covers remote access via security servers as well. Setting up remote access with a view PCoIP 4.6 and newer https://communities.VMware.com/docs/doc-14974

  I guess the fact that you can connect through the servers of connection that the URL you configured in the view administrator for servers in connection is a production local IP address/address?

  External security URL server is also an IP/address of DMZ / external can be solved?

• Version 31 will not get messages from the imap without security the value none Server

  I've updated Thunderbird version 24 to 31. My mail server is an imap server and has always worked well. Since I've upgraded to version 31 I can't recover my mail unless the connection security is set to zero and the port is 143. The imap server using SSL/TLS with port 993. It worked for me on the old version of 24, but now it won't.

  Suggestions? I cannot continue to use no security connection, but would not be pretty.

  you have mail scanning in your anti virus? SSL trips them something terrible and can cause this your light.