DSC-F828 Conversion Lens

Similar Questions

• Sony Cybershot DSC HX 300 lens

  What is the actual size of the UV lens filter polarizer should I buy for my Sony Cybershot HX 300. It is 58mm or 55mm? Sony store suggestion it is 55 m on youtube there is a video of 58mm lenses. I'm confused-need expert pls advice.

  We cannot confirm the exact size filter diameter of the lens because it is not a published specification. There is also no compatibility information on the use of filters with this device.

  If this post answered your question, please mark "accept as a Solution.

• What is the size of filter lens for Sony DSC H-50

  What is the size of filter lens for Sony DSC H50

  The provided camera adapter ring will allow you to attach the lens hood provided as a conversion lens. This adapter ring has a diameter of 30mm filter.

  If this post answered your question, please mark "accept as a Solution.

• Lens EF - S v Lens EF - Crop Factor (factor of Conversion of Image)

  Good evening

  Please excuse me if this is a stupid question.

  If I use a lens EF-S on a camera with an APS - C sensor, the sensor capture is all that I see in the viewfinder, i, e, with a ratio of 1:1?

  In other words; the EF-S-objectives overcome the factor of Conversion of Image or Crop Factor happening with EF lenses on cameras with an APS - C sensor?

  The Crop Factor means that what you see in the viewfinder is more that actually he is captured by the sensor by a ratio of 1: 1. 6.

  I understand that the rear of the EF-S lens is more close to the mirror and, therefore the sensor, as the rear of the EF lens, which leads me to think that the image seen through the viewfinder with an EF-S lens is closer to that which will appear on the sensor than an EF lens.

  Thanks a lot for any response that confirms or refutes my guess, preferably with an explanation in simple terms.

  Joe.

  The ' in the name of EF - S stands for short focal length. This is of no interest to the user.  And the crop factor is also of no interest to the user.  The camera crops nothing.  It is a full frame in the sense you get what you see in the viewfinder.

  The term arises because of old film camera using 35 mm film.  Someone wanted to know how to compare the two.

  People do not really consider it iphones as crop cameras but they are.  As a Canon Rebel is.  Nobody calls a medium unit format and the camera of enlargement.  But it would be if you used the same logic.  Forget it.

  It is best to think in terms of "point of view" (AOV).  That never changes no matter what device you use.  For example...  Any lens that give a degree 46 AOV is considered to be normal.  It makes no difference what device you use.  This specification is included with each goal.  MM tells you what is the objective.  AOV tells you what it does.

• Need the number of part/name of the metal for the DSC - RX1 lens cap

  Hello

  I need the name/number of the metal cap provided for the DSC - RX1.

  Like this one:

  http://Matt.WordPress.com/2013/01/09/lens-cap-on-Sony-RX1/

  Thank you

  Michael

  Hello Michael,

  The part number of lens for DSC - RX1 cap X 25870671, you will find this accessory at our website to the center of the part to https://servicesales.sel.sony.com/ecom/accessories/web/index.jsp

  If my post answered your question, please mark it as "accept as a Solution.

• Lens for Sony DSC-HX200V

  I'm looking for a telephoto lens for my camera wives are their all that adapts to the DSC-HX200V? and suggestions, if there are

  If I remember correctly, the hx200 is a bridge camera, which means DSLR - like model design and features, but uses a fixed, non interchangeable lens. So my answer is unfortunately no, there is no telephoto lens that you can add on, sorry

• Y at - it a conversion adapter for my SALT 1855 fisheye lens

  I am looking for a lens adapter to use with my Sony SALT 1855 lens. What options available for my NEX camera arte 7. ?

  Thanks, that helps a lot, Congrats and accept as a solution, Tom

• Cybershot DSC-tx200v AVCHD 28 M conversion in an acceptable format for Mac

  I gave my wife this new camera before moving a week 3 cruise Down Under, it came together from high level on the quality of the movie, I have a MacPro w/IOS 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard) and will not download. I need a way to convert AVCHD 28 M in a less acceptable format by iMovie 11 (ver 9.0.4) last update, we have about 2 hours. the film of our trip and need help quickly... S.O.S...!

  Hello Ricardo,

  Hope you and your wife enjoyed your trip to Australia.

  Im sure that you have unforgettable memories recorded on your DSC-TX200V

  Please follow this guide from apple which may help you to copy and transfer your AVCHD videos

  http://support.Apple.com/kb/HT5251

  We have also a few procedures step by step to help you here:

  http://www.KB.Sony.com/selfservice/documentLink.do?externalId=C1023736

  as well as a video tutorial

• Sony DSC-HX200V - Play in lens Tube

  Is it normal to have "LOTS" of movement/play with the lens tube? (If that's what it's called?) As far as I know than all other cameras I've owned that they were tight with no game. A Canon SX500is with 30 x zoom, I was thinking about this is tight with no game.

  If it is normal, why? It has something to do with stabilization?

  Leaping GNOME

  I never noticed, I guess because it's only a 3 x zoom, but my Olympus SP - 350 lens is the same way.

• How can I see additional conversations in Messages?

  When I search the Messages from a contact, it shows that there are three games under this name but only one of the 3 conversations is visible and it is more than a year.  This is a person who I have message frequently so why when I enter its name in the search field me I only give this old conversation?  Where are the other 2? Why are there 3 separate matches for the same person?  Somehow merge them?  Very confusing!

  Hello

  In the Messages, I use my iPhone number to send to iPhone

  In return I use the Apple ID to send the iPhone to the Mac.

  I also have a name @me.com connected with LENS

  Even an ID @icloud.com

  I @mac.com older ending IDs which are also connected to the GOAL, but are related to address cards FRO my other computers.

  Then I have a ID an ID connected Yahoo and Google.

  In other words, if I use the icon to start a new message and you start typing my name I get a lot of 'results '.

  

  So I address sheets for my G4 (Ralph G4) and my MacBook Pro (Ralph MacBook Pro)

  Certain IDs not related to address cards.

  An address listed as Ralph iChat Guru card.

  Saying them No Name are the IDS not related to address cards.

  Some like the bottom two are the same, but showing I could 'talk' to other accounts in the Messages. As such, the list is quite long.

  El Capitan or rather Messages 9.2 does not show your own options iMessages.

  Even if you delete an element from an address card (for example, the deceased iPhone number), he sees the app remembers it as an option and continues to show.

  I have not found where Messages maintains this list sort or "recent" to be able to change it.

  So if iPhone this person number isn't on their card typing in their name usually will show you the name.

  You will need to type in the number iPhone and then it only displays the number.

  (Displays only the card info not above and the ID contains 'ral')

  If their ID has changed and is not related to the address card it will not show.

  I hope this provides some clues as the response based on the experience does not always what you think that the app will do.

  

  20:30 Monday; June 13, 2016

   iMac 2.5 Ghz i5 2011 (El Capitan)
   G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
   MacBookPro (Snow Leopard 10.6.8) 2 GB
   Mac OS X (10.6.8).
   iPhone and iPad (2)

• Difference between DSC-HX400B DSC-HX400V

  Anyone know the difference between HX400B DSC & DSC-HX400V

  I don't know one main difference is the lens - 400B is just standard lens Sony, or whatever the goal is, while 400V is best quality objective Carl Zeiss

  Also, the models of Sony with V means generally support GPS - not sure if it is.

  It's about the main differences.

• configuration of Web page tool freezes to the 8.6 with DSC

  I'm developing an application of DSC in LV8.6.   I have no problem with the configuration of the server web page for test applications small including those using a hypertrend control.  A problem with my larger application with shared variables, IO etc. servers.  When I open the Web server configuration tool, it is practically non-functional.  I put an option on the first page and then it freezes and I need to stop LabView by using the Windows Task Manager to get out of the State.   Are there portions of LabView or DSC, which can damage the configuration web page tool?

  Thanks for your help.

  Len

  Nathan,

  I now have a working web page. Thank you for your help.  It took a long time to build, but the result is a Web page that works as expected.  I'm still in the dark as to why my request takes so long to start and why the web tool has taken so long to do its job.  Two things may be related.  Is there an obvious way to start debugging to determine the elements of the slow loading?

  Kind regards

  Len

• What is the best approach to the conversion of the LV7.1 tags to the variables shared by several screws LV2012?

  What is the best approach for the upgrade of the DSC-LV2012/LV7.1/DSC static variable tags in several screws running on several platforms? Our system is made up of about 5 PC running Windows 2000/LV7.1 DURATION, the more a PLC and a PDC running XP/SP3/LV2012. About 3 PC publish information from the sensor through tags on the local network to the PDC. Only the main command is currently being upgraded. Basic questions:

  1. the other computers running RTÉ 7.1 (with labels) will be able to communicate with the PDC running 2012 (shared variables)?

  2. is it necessary for conversion of tags shared variables, or the deprecated legacy tag screws of LV7.1 work in LV2012?

  3 all of the main controllers will be screw must be integrated in a project in order to use shared variables?

  4 is the only way to do it is to find all the tags and replace them with elements of shared variable?

  Thank you in advance with all the information and advice!

  lb

  Hello lb.

  Datasockets are the common middle only my knowledge between versions, so apart from the upgrade to the same version, they will probably be your best bet.

• Effects of the use of EF lens and a EF-S camera crop factor calculations.

  I've been reading about sensors APS - C and the differences between EF and EF-S objectives.

  I have two questions pending about how the EF-S-objectives are marketed.

  (1) objectives EF - S need to have the factor of 1.6 x applied for effective focal length or are they marked correctly since they can only be used in APS - C cameras?

  FOR EXAMPLE my 17-40mm 4 L EF lens is actually a 27, 2-64mm when used in a camera to mount EF-S due to the 1.6 x factor.

  So a first objective 60 mm EF-S would in fact be similar to a 60mm EF lens first in terms of focal length and 'zoom' level of the image? Or she also apply the crop factor and actually be a focal length of 96mm?

  (2) are there other attributes of a lens EF you must apply a conversion when using in an EF-S mount? Side f-stop?

  Thank you in advance for any guidance that offer you!

  Designation is fashoned it was for 35 mm cameras and the crop factor is not considered in appointing focal length / range of lenses if they have an EF or EF-S mount. a 60 mm is a 60 mm.

• Canon lens EF 70-200mm L F4 USM + 2 X L series extender

  Hi, I have a Canon lens EF 70-200mm L F4 USM. Now, I want to buy an extension of series X L 2. Can someone help me by informing that AF can work with EF 70-200mm L USM F4 + 2 X Extender mounted on 650 d device and how much image quality I have to make compromises for the same thing.

  mithun_pal129 wrote:

  Thank you all for your valuable comments. I forgot to mention that my intension of extender to my EF 70-200mm L F4 USM in a telephoto lens for wildlife / birds. But now that I'm your stay in Abu Dhabi, he is not paid a lot of bird / wild life. This is why I don't want to spend a lot on super telephoto, and personally, I don't want to go to cheap Sigma lens. So I wanted to do objective 70-200mm + 2 Expander x 140-400 mm. As I myself feel 1.4 X extender is pretty good, but it will give me up to 280mm. I know that's not very good lens for bird / wild raise photography. But you want to know still is feasible or if I use 2 x Extender to make the 400mm autofocus lens is required for the wild life or manual focus can still operate at F8. I don't have a lot of experience in the photography of wild life that's why I wanted to know things.

  In a Word... N °

  Of a 2 X teleconverter on a 70-200/4 made for a lens of 140-400/8 "effective." Due to the reduction of light reaching the AF sensors, your camera will turn off autofocus. A stronger 2 X also "costs" more loss of quality of the image due to the deterioration.

  It is possible to tape on some of the electronic contacts on the focal length multiplier, so that the camera does not know it is there and always try to auto focus. However, the autofocus will be much slower and will tend to hunt much more.

  In some situations, you may be able to manually update. However, effective f8 makes for a pretty weak sight, most cameras update automatic modern as you do not have some fo the features allowing the development manual, vintage cameras designed for the manual focus had in the past. Some people change to one-third of frosted glass to add functionality to support manual focus (split finder image, micro diaprisms, for example). However this requires careful work to install the screen and the display of different can affect precision measurement of the camera, especially in the incorrect Spot metering.

  Addition of a lower 1.4 X teleconverter makes your lens in effect 112-280mm f5.6, who will still be updated with auto focus and will be much less loss of image quality, but not as much 'reach. If yours is a goal IS, it can reasonably be handholdable. If it is not a goal IS, you will need to watch your shutter speeds than blur carefully, probably should keep to 1/500 or more quickly to avoid the camera. Or use a tripod, as suggested by ebibgs, or at least a monopod. You also need to limit the autofocus on your camera to the central AF point only, I think.

  ebiggs1 wrote:

  On your camera, the 70-200mm f4 is like a 112-320mm f4.  With a converter 1. 4 x, looking at 448mm f5.6 and th elong end.  + 400 mm should be long enough for you to get photos of some birds.  BTW, use a tripod.

  While it is technically correct, citing the "crop camera lens factor" in this way may not help much, can be confusing.

  The original poster has simply a 70-200mm lens which they are accustomed to using on a crop sensor camera. They would now like to double the range of this lens on their camera. Crop sensor lens incorporating conversation factor is very useful when the user goes from frame of film/full to reframe the camera or vice versa. For someone who has never used a film camera or has not used one for many years and is now completely accustomed to how behaves a lens of focal length on their device to harvest, it is a completely moot point.

  But what he's basically saying that while you can add a 2 X, it is probably not a good idea for several reasons. Auto focus will work or not, with a few tips, won't work only weakly. Manual focus will be difficult. And the picture quality might take too big a hit, combining a 2 X with your goal. .

  I have a 70-200/4 IS, 70-200/2.8 IS ("Mark I"), 1. 4 X II and 2 X Teleconverters II. I also have long telephoto lenses, so rarely need to add these zooms teleconverter. However if necessary I would use 1.4 X on one of them. But even if AF still work on the 70-200/2.8 + 2 X combo, I won't use it because of the amount of loss of image quality (the most recent IS of 70 - 200/2.8 Mark II and 2 X Mark III are supposed to work together better, than my older versions of each).

  I use mostly 2 X on 300/2.8 and 500/4 lenses privileged where the image quality is still good. (Note: Yes, on some of my cameras 2 X 500/4 causes AF to stop working, as it would on your f4 lens, so I only use the combo on a limited basis.)

  mithun_pal129... I would say the more you get a 1. 4 X and use it with your goal. See if the image quality is to your expectations. Then work to get closer to your subjects. Or bring them closer to you. Practice the techniques of stalking and to study the behaviors of your subjects to discover ways to get closer. Work in a blind and use bait (food, calls). And start saving for a lens of longer focal length.

  The Canon 1.4 X II and III teleconverters are excellent. All Canon teleconverters have mated before elements that limit the lenses that they physically can be attached, but the 70-200 are among those where this is possible. Teleconverter Kenko is another that I see quite often recommended. They have two different levels of quality: a more expensive "Pro 300" version and a cheaper "MC - 4". These are currently offered in versions "DGX" whose operation is very similar to Canon teleconverters. Old Kenko teleconverters "DG" not "reported" to the camera, the camera didn't know they were there, so try to focus.  In the view of users and tests I've seen, the current Kenko Pro 300 DGX is pretty good overall of the entire image area. The MC - 4 cheaper is actually a little sharper in the Center, but not as strong in the corners and the edges of the image. Tamron and Sigma teleconverters also do, but I have little experience or knowledge of the current versions of the people.

  The wildlife/bird photography is not easy. Since no matter how long a goal that you have, there are times when the subjects are just out of reach and all you can go is to sit back and enjoy the show.

  These photos of small subjects with different, but close to or less than the effective focal length even lenses like your 70-200 mm + a 1. 4 X teleconverter would be on your camera...

  

  

  

  

  ***********
  Alan Myers

  San Jose, California, USA.
  «Market softly and carry a great lens.»
  MATERIAL: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
  FLICKR & REPROGRAPHY