each user process in separated CPU core

Hello

I have 12 CPU cores; I want to run the process of each user in separate processor.

So that each of them will receive good performance. I found on Google, but not exactly the solution affinity.

Thank you

What you're looking for can be.

Tags: Windows

Similar Questions

in the case of backup files, are both users of saved files, or files for each user must be backed up separately?

original title: backup of files

My wife and I use the same computer, but have different usernames (accounts). My question is: when a backup occurs files, two files users are saved, or files for each user must be backed up separately?

Hi toad133,

· What type of backup that you talk too much?

If you are referring to the automatic backup there backup everything that you have selected or defined to be backed up.

If you are referring to the manual backup backs up what settings or files that you select to backup such as emails or files.

Back up and restore: frequently asked questions

http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/back-up-and-restore-frequently-asked-questions

I hope this helps!

Halima S - Microsoft technical support.

Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

VSphere essentials 8 cpu cores

Hi all
We recently have quote a customer to purchase vsphere essentials with a server that will run 2 processors 6 hearts of each.
After a month, that the customer has accepted the quote if we order the server, but we noticed it came with 2 CPUs, 8 cores on each. We always evaluate vsphere esxi 4.1 and we haven't bought yet most of license. The reason to upgrade to vsphere essentials was to migrate 3-4 very old physical servers to this new server. No need to HA or vmotion is necessary. We needed an inexpensive way to get rid of these old servers.
Can someone explain to us what will be the situation if buy us the essentials license and insert it on vsphere? Esxi 4.1 vsphere will continue to operate with limited cpu core feature or it will prevent all our VMs to stop working?
Thank you

I can't answer your question with certainty, and I think the only one who can is VMware itself.

My guess is that it can work, but you're probably violating the EULA.

What I actually wanted to mention are the fact that some harware like HP providers offer a known BIOS setting 'disable Core processor'. This feature allows to disable some carrots.

of http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c01905798/c01905798.pdf

When to turn off the processor cores

While disabling the carrots may seem paradoxical to provide superior performance, there are at least three situations in which the disabling processor cores may be beneficial.

-Use of power reduction. Disabling the processor cores reduces processor power consumption. If a server is used in an environment that is not heavily dependent on multithreading hearts, by disabling the can reduce energy consumption without significantly affecting performance.

-Increase overall performance. Some applications take advantage of higher frequency of basis rather than extra processing cores. When Turbo Mode is activated for processors Intel Nehalem, savings on electricity and heat produced by disabling the processor cores allows the remaining sons operate at a higher frequency than their rated speed. In the specific application environments, this could actually increase the overall performance of the system.

-Meet the licensing issues. Some software are permitted on a basis of by heart. Deactivation of the cores allows an administrator to match the number of active cores on a server with licensing requirements. However, some software that is allowed on a per-core basis may not recognize the deactivation of carrots.

André

How-to: set up another user to connect separately

How to set up another user to open a session on their desktop separately from myself? Is it not logical to have more than one user name on a PC when there is more than one user?

How to set up another user to open a session on their desktop separately from myself? Is it not logical to have more than one user name on a PC when there is more than one user?

In general, for the purposes of personal confidentiality, each user has access to his user account and so own name username and password which will be known only to this particular user.

Which means... every user will log on access to his own office with access to its own username and password.

Based on this principle, Yes, it is quite logical.

In addition, the general tule of thumb is that, there is an account administrator accessible only to the administrator.
The rest of the accounts are standard accounts that do not have administrator privileges.
For preventive measures, it is also wise to have 2 Administrator accounts. One will be a "backup" for an emergency so that if an admin fails to connect, there is another to retreat.

I guess you don't know how to create user accounts. Yes?
If not, please after return.

ESXi 5.1 & 5.0 - ordinal number for active Hyperthreaded Intel CPU Core

OK, I think I asked this before, maybe, about 2 years ago but I don't remember what the answer was.
So here's the question...
In a host of CPU 2 where each CPU has 4 cores for a total of 8 cores BUT with technology HT (Hyperthreading) enabled, for a total of 16 cores, how can you determine what core HT is and what the ordinal position?
I thought that the ordinal went like this...
CPU 0:
0 base = true core
Base 1 = Core HT
Base 2 = real basic
Basic 3 = Core HT
4 basic = true core
5 core = Core HT
6 basic = true core
7 core = Core HT
CPU 1:
8 basic = true core
9 core = Core HT
Base 10 = true core
11 core = Core HT
12 basic = true core
13 core = Core HT
14 basic = true core
15 core = Core HT
Anyone have any ideas?
Thank you

See;

http://pubs.VMware.com/vSphere-50/topic/com.VMware.vSphere.resmgmt.doc_50/GUID-3362A2E9-AB03-4C10-B9A1-3E6CA78D399B.html

Hyperthreading and ESXi hosts

A host that is enabled for hyperthreading should behave similarly to a host without hyperthreading. You may need to take into consideration certain factors if you enable hyperthreading, however.

ESXi hosts manage time processor intelligently in order to ensure that the load is distributed smoothly on CPU cores in the system. Logical processors on the same core have consecutive numbers of CPU, so that CPU 0 and 1 are on the first core set, CPU 2 and 3 are on the kernel, second and so on. Virtual machines are preferentially on demand on two different cores rather than on the two logical processors on the same kernel.

If there is no work for a logical processor, it is put in a stopped state, which releases its resources to enforcement and allows the virtual machine running on the other logical processor on the same kernel to use the resources of the full implementation of the core. VMware scheduler correctly represents for this downtime and the load of a virtual machine running with all the resources of a core more than a virtual machine running on a basis of one half. This approach to processor management ensures that the server does not violate standard ESXi resources allocation rules.

Consider that your management needs before you enable the processor affinity on servers using hyperthreading. For example, if you link a virtual machine of high priority to the CPU 0 and one other high-priority CPU 1, two virtual machines virtual machine must share the same physical core. In this case, it may be impossible to respect requests for resources of these virtual machines. Ensure that all custom settings affinity of meaning for a hyperthreading system.

in vm CPU cores

Hello
Running windows 2003 standard 64-bit vm and try to get allows them to use multiple cores CPU instead of multiple vcpus.
As a test, I gave the vcpu image 4 x and it displays correctly 4 graphics processor in the Manager of tasks and 4 processors in Device Manager.
I also tried setting the cpuid.coresPerSocket using different values (2, 4 etc.) but that does not increase the amount of graphics and the specified processors.
I it is dropped back to 1 and 2 vcpu and tried carrots by socket yet still no extra processor graphics.
Is there anything else I should do as the plan is to get 4 cores for a sql database instead of having to use several vcpu for licensing reasons.

dhedges wrote:

Running windows 2003 standard 64-bit vm and try to get allows them to use multiple cores CPU instead of multiple vcpus.

The physical representation of a vCPU is a kernel.

As a test, I gave the vcpu image 4 x and it displays correctly 4 graphics processor in the Manager of tasks and 4 processors in Device Manager.

I also tried setting the cpuid.coresPerSocket using different values (2, 4 etc.) but that does not increase the amount of graphics and the specified processors.

That's right, as you do not increase the number of vCPU'. Example: If you have a host with 4 dual-core CPUS (8 cores) and run Windows 2003 SE on it, get physical Windows is reported that there are 4 CPU with 2 hearts of each. Even that Windows 2003 SE is limited to 4 CPUS, it would still run on all 8 cores.

In a virtual machine, it gets reported that you assigned. Suppose that 4 vCPU. If Windows thinks that it works on 4 CPUS with the nucleus of one (!). So now the physical box that he must deal with a maximum of 4 cores (out of 8).

Change that and let the guest to run on all 2 4 CPU cores, you must assign 8 vCPU for prompt and set parameter 2. Then Windows will run on 8 cores because he sees 4 CPU with 2 hearts of each. And Windows 2003 himself is limited by the CPU is not carrots.

Read this: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1010184

AWo

VCP 3 & 4

\[:o]===\[o:]

= You want to have this ad as a ringtone on your mobile phone? =

= Send 'Assignment' to 911 for only $999999,99! =

How to configure applications private for each user?
I created different users in a single workspace. I want that applications of each user to be private so that user applications should not be regarded by others.
Can someone suggest me...
Thus, the term "user" was used in "application developer".

The idea behind Apex Application Builder is the team and that's why you have offers to work as a team. You want to go in the opposite direction for your reasons.

The only way I know is to create the workspace separately for each developer. In this way, that each developer sees only its applications in Application Builder. If developers use the same tables/views of db, then you must assign the schema that contains the data for each of these workspaces.

But if you want to ensure that developers do not yet see each and other data and then they you need to keep the data as separate.

While it's all just do not forget that some days, that applications must be deployed and end users must Access!

I'm not aware of any other mechanism to isolate developers.

Kind regards

map a user process oracle for the process of the BONE?
Hi all

When a client connects to the Server DB and oracle user
process (< SID > oracle) is started in (dedicated solaris
Server mode), how can I know who is the actual process
Is this connection?

for example: sid is db1

ps - ef | grep oracledb1
...
...
0 S 17406 1 0 39 20 oracle? 2159176? 09:50:09? 0:31 oracledb1 (LOCAL = NO)
0 S 22198 1 0 39 20 oracle? 2158821? 10:18:37? 0:01 oracledb1 (LOCAL = NO)
0 S 9873 1 0 39 20 oracle? 2158275? 12:14:06? 0:01 oracledb1 (LOCAL = NO)
...
...

How will I know which of the oracledb1 belongs to a customer connection?

Thank you very much!
Sam
user8803644 wrote:
Hi all

When a client connects to the Server DB and oracle user
process (oracle) is started in (dedicated solaris
Server mode), how can I know who is the actual process
Is this connection?

for example: sid is db1

ps - ef | grep oracledb1
...
...
0 S 17406 1 0 39 20 oracle? 2159176? 09:50:09? 0:31 oracledb1 (LOCAL = NO)
0 S 22198 1 0 39 20 oracle? 2158821? 10:18:37? 0:01 oracledb1 (LOCAL = NO)
0 S 9873 1 0 39 20 oracle? 2158275? 12:14:06? 0:01 oracledb1 (LOCAL = NO)
...
...

How will I know which of the oracledb1 belongs to a customer connection?

Thank you very much!
Sam

Do as below
```
SQL> connect user1/user1
Connected.
SQL> !ps -ef | grep LOCAL
oracle   32331 26842  0 20:36 ?        00:00:00 oraclev112 (DESCRIPTION=(LOCAL=YES)(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=beq)))
bcm      32332 26842  0 20:37 pts/0    00:00:00 /bin/bash -c ps -ef | grep LOCAL
bcm      32334 32332  0 20:37 pts/0    00:00:00 grep LOCAL

SQL> select
   b.username,
   b.sid,
   b.serial#,
   a.spid
from
   v$session b,
   v$process a
where
   b.username = 'USER1'
and
   a.addr = b.paddr
/  2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9   10   11   12   13  

USERNAME                     SID    SERIAL# SPID
------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ------------------------
USER1                          146     1288 32331

SQL> 
```
Handle: user8803644
Status level: Beginner
Join date: December 29, 2010
Messages total: 13
Total Questions: 5 (5 open)

Why EACH question still unanswered?

Published by: sb92075 on February 15, 2012 20:43

Various system processes lead alienated CPU

I don't know where to begin - several rotating system process drive my CPU alienated to the point where my 2014 rMBP lasts maybe 3 hours off the charger and maintains high fans.

The processes include:
- Google Chrome help
- CalendarAgent
- CalNCService
- PhotoAnalysis
- Process associated with Sophos (this is a commercial application of the antivirus that I need to have on my computer by work/school)
Things, I tried, without permanent success:
- Reset my keychain - what causes a detective of other problems leading to -.
- Restore my computer from a time Machine to the top
- Remove all 3 Google calendars I've linked
- Removal of caches
Ideas? I'm a student, so he is facing the embarrassment of fans screaming out of control... or my wrists while in the middle of burning class. I just noticed that running my MBP with an external screen made it to calm down but the process still zip to the top intermittently.

Crazy to believe, but the deactivation of reminders iCloud did the trick...

How can I stop Firefox profiles great taking place on the C drive for each user?

I have several users on a Windows Server 2008 R2 Remote Desktop Server (Terminal Server) and all of them use Firefox. Each of their profiles become huge because of their Firefox profiles.

Seems that all the space the file cache. (C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\Profile.default\Cache)

Is it possible to implement a policy within the program to clear the cache for each user or each time the browser is closed or when the user disconnects?

Hello nukeit108, you can set the preference browser.cache.disk.enable to false, then no cache file will be written to disk (does not affect the entries cached in RAM).

See also http://kb.mozillazine.org/Locking_preferences

Question about CPU cores

I've had computers since the 98 so I'm not a beginner, but I'm also no computer genius.

I got this new laptop in 2013. So far I have had a few problems with it, but since I also have a desktop computer (works in 32 bit Vista), I could get things to normal by doing some research on google. Nothing major since the last time I restored it to the plant that was in June of this year.

Anyway, recently I came "Open Hardware Monitor" mainly to check the temperature, and I noticed it says that there are only 2 CPU cores. I find it weird because I thought it was supposed to be a Quad-Core.

I was wondering how I can go on double check that and let the other 2 cores? Who would even wise to do?

I don't really like for all the eye-candy as much as I want my machine to be fast and allow multitasking. I also plan to upgrade the RAM at the present time it is still running factory - I think that 6 G, but I would like to upgrade to the best and the best as well.

I have a Samsung's Ext to 5 t hard drive soon and I want to just make sure that my mess is as soon as possible within reasonable limits of course. I try not to fry or something. I want it to run at maximum performance.

In any case, I appreciate any help or advice I can get. Thank you for your time. Amanda

Just uncheck it. The default is to allow all processors to run. Somehow your system has limited the number of operational cores to 2. Uncheck and reboot and recheck the Task Manager

Only 1 CPU Core is recognized on the Satellite L650-1MC

Hello guys, once again

As the title says, only 1 CPU core is recognized on my L650-1MC. There an i5 480M CPU.

http://Ark.Intel.com/products/52952/Intel-Core-i5-480M-processor-(3 m - Cache - 2_66 - GHz)

A monitoring program called 'speccy' says:

Intel Core i5
Carrots 1
NET 2
Name Intel Core i5
Code-named Arrandale
Package Socket 989 rPGA
The 32nm technology
Specification Intel (r) Core i5 CPU M 480 @ 2.67GHz
Family 6
Extended family 6
Model 5
Model expanded 25
Not to not 5
Revision K0
Instructions, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Intel 64
Virtualization supported, enabled
Hyperthreading is supported, enabled
134,0 MHz bus speed
2412,6 MHz rated Bus speed
Base speed 2666 MHz stock
Stock of 133 MHz Bus speed

L1 Data Cache size 32 KB
L1 Instructions Cache size 32 KBytes
L2 unified Cache size 256 KB
L3 Unified Cache Size 3072 KB
Core 0
Basic speed 2934,1 MHz
Multiplier x 9.0
133,4 MHz bus speed
2400,7 MHz rated Bus speed
Temperature of 52 ° C
Thread 1
APIC ID 0
Thread 2
APIC ID 1

The task manager has two graphics and I can change to/from the "one graph per cpu and one graph, all CPUs" in the options display, although that I thought she should have 4 graphics; which is logical that the CPU has 4 wires, so should have 4 graphics.

Any ideas? I tried msconfig and reset the number of processors, but then it resets the memory to 2 GB so I have to reset that and restart it to recognize all the 6 GB of ram. but then my cpu is a nucleus! It seems that I have a dual core cpu and 2 GB of RAM or a simple core cpu and 6 GB ram! ATM I'm on a single processor core with 6 GB of ram. I think the only thing I can do is reset the cpu in msconfig and reboot and see if it works, but then it will set the RAM to 2 GB. I 'afraid' to uncheck the CPU and RAM at the same time, incase of my laptop computer won't load at all. What do you think?

It is not too much a problem; If I had only 2/3 GB of RAM, then it would be a problem, would be just nice to have my CPU dual core of return!

As always, I would be really grateful for any help with it.

Thank you for taking the time to read this.

Hello

You tested it with a 3rd party software called ' speccy
Have you tested other tools like Everest Home Edition or CPU - Z?

Strongly recommend do it and compare the results, because a single tool can provide erroneous values.

Where to store the TS files for each user on a Terminal Server in Windows 2008 Server

I have a TS w 2008 R2 and have a program that requires files kept for each user in their own folder, where it configures in TS. Each user will have its own folder cache for this program

Each user login for TS and have a user on a shared folder, this program should have updated files in this folder.

Hi DavidBabbel,

The question you have posted is related to the area and would be better suited to the TechNet community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the best support.

http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winserverTS/threads

Works with Windows XP SP2 with IE8. A Norton 360 process ccSvcHst.exe CPU consumption. Upgraded to version 4.0.__Now IE8 Norton is very unstable, different processes consuming CPU even with turned off Norton. __

I opened a folder support with Norton a couple of days, for a problem with ccSvcHst.exe cripling process my system by consuming my CPU. I found that it was a common problem, and so I wanted Norton to solve. Their guy accesed my remote system support and made a few changes to my configuration utility and my registry files and then upgraded my version of their latest version 4.0

After the end of the support session, I finally restarted my system and encountered an error on my configuration utility being in a State of diagnosis, then that I should put it in a normal mode and restart again. I noticed that it had disabled the start of my services. I selected a normal startup and restarted.

The problem with ccSvcHst.exe consuming my CPU is now resolved - be replaced by different processes consuming my CPU and use of extremely heavy memory (or misuse). Faulty processes are mostly explorer.exe and iexplore.exe. Not only that, but this current problem exists even when I turn off Norton. I tried you connecting another deal with them, but they will not address the issue, since the problem (now) exist even without Norton running. So, basically, they made the problem worse and then pushed him on Microsoft to resolve the issue. It's really nice...

Anyone have any ideas?

It seems that your computer is infected. I get this from the fact that iexplore.exe (Internet Explorer) is running. If you haven't started IE yourself, then it is a clear symptom of malware infection.

Through these generals the malware removal not systematically - http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Removing_Malware

Include analysis with David Lipman's Multi_AV of and follow the instructions to do all scans in Mode without failure. Read the Special Notes about the use of Multi_AV in Vista.

http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Multi-AV - instructions
http://tinyurl.com/yoeru3 - download link and further instructions

When it failed, download Guided Help. Choose one of the specialty forums listed on the first link. Save and read his FAQ display. PLEASE DO NOT DISTRIBUTE NEWSPAPERS IN MS FORUMS

If you can't do the work yourself (and there is no shame in admitting this isn't your cup of tea), take the machine to a professional computer repair shop (not your local equivalent of BigComputerStore/GeekSquad). Please be aware that not all shops are skilled at removing malware, and even if they are, your computer may be so infested that Windows will have to be properly installed. If possible, have all your data backed up before taking the machine into a shop. MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

It is necessary to download Google Chrome for each user on my Vista computer?

Why, if I have more than one user, do I download google chrome for each user? Is there a way I don't have to download a second for the other user?

* original title - computer with more than one user *.

Google Chrome since the normal download install personal folders to the user. This allows Chrome to be installed by users who have administrator privileges. Apparently you can install for all users with this procedure:

http://www.Google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=118663

Check Google forums, that applies and will be based in the future.

each user process in separated CPU core

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for