Essbase number difference blocks
Hello
I have EMP 11.1.2.2 and I am exporting and importing cube BSO dev to uat environment. After importation and performing calculations, I see little difference there in the 'Number of blocks' and "Existing cutters uper level" in any environment.
Others like "existing level 0 blocks", "Block size" and 'The potential number of blocks' are the same.
Can you please let me know what could be the reason for the difference, even if it's the same data, and the pattern is the same.
You asked a very similar question earlier (I have not this good a souvenir, but I searched this thread designate in this one!): https://forums.oracle.com/message/10877200#10877200
My first guess would be "all the #Missing ' top level in one or the other cube blocks. You did not say that we have more, by the way. But if they reconcile, and a restructuring forced in both environments brings counties into alignment I doubt you have a problem.
Tags: Business Intelligence
Similar Questions
-
Hello
I have a table T, and it has 30 rows.
I put the command:
Select
Count (*) "number of lines"
DBMS_ROWID. ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER (ROWID) 'block No. '.
Of
t
Group
DBMS_ROWID. ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER (ROWID)
and Oracle gave me the block number 663 that all rows are in the block.
Also, I used user_tables, dbms_space.space_usage, dbms_space.unused_space
to check the number of used blocks and the number of unused blocks
The result makes me confused because the number of blocks in rowid_block_number() - 1 - is different
from user_tables, dbms_space.space_usage () - 5.
If 5 is the correct number of blocks, why isn't the value of the empty_blocks column in user_tables 3?
(The total in table T blocks would have the value 8, according to dbms_space.unused_space (),
and blocks are 5, so 8-5 = 3)
Can someone tell me the difference in the value of the blocks, free blocks and total blocks between the view and the functions?
Thanks in advance.
Under Oracle SAMS usually formats 16 blocks at once, but since you use the allocated system extensions the first measure is only 8 blocks so the whole extent is formatted.
As the 1 degree in the segment, the 3 first blocks are the space management (level 1 bitmap, bitmap image in level 2, segment header) leaving you 5 blocks that are formatted and 100% free space and you have then inserted you stored in the pseudo (-) randomly selected last block of scale - leaving you with 4 blocks to 100% of free space and a partially filled block.
Concerning
Jonathan Lewis
-
What happens when a number of blocked calls a person and they're on another line?
What happens when a number of blocked calls the person and they're on another line? Does go directly to voicemail, or ring several times to voice mail?
If "on the other line" means on another call and call waiting is activated, the blocked call goes straight to voicemail.
-
Full Table Scan: logical reads are the same as the number of blocks
Hi people,
Please see the following execution plan:
Hash value of plan: 1148783227
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| ID | Operation | Name | Begins | E - lines. A - lines. A - time | Pads | Bed | OMem | 1Mem | Used Mem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1. | 0 | 00:01:20.23 | 481K | 481K | | | |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1. 50351 | 0 | 00:01:20.23 | 481K | 481K | 7902K | 2074K | 7997K (0) |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 1. 50351 | 31333 | 00:00:01.45 | 3138. 3134 | 17 M | 2295K | 18 M (0).
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | INS_DCT_BUSINESS_FOLDER | 1. 50351 | 122K | 00:00:00.82 | 2262 | 2260 | | | |
| 4. TABLE ACCESS FULL | INS_DCT_CLAIM_DECEASED_FOLDER | 1. 73533 | 76656 | 00:00:00.34 | 876. 874. | | |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | INS_COMMON_PARTY | 1. 616K | 0 | 00:01:18.71 | 478K | 478K | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - access("THIS_".") PARTY_PK "= 'PARTY1_'." PK")
2 - access("THIS_".") FOLDER_ID '= 'THIS_1_'.' FOLDER_ID")
3 filter (("THIS_1_". "STATUS" <>"10" AND "THIS_1_" "." " STATUS' <>' 07 "AND"THIS_1_". ((' ' STATUS ' <>' 08'))
5 filter (("PARTY1_". "CUSTOMER_ID" LIKE "%#CHAMP290501C #00000 ' AND 'PARTY1_'." CUSTOMER_ID' IS NOT NULL))
The full table on INS_COMMON_PARTY scan generated 478 K physical IO.
But the table contains 479K
SQL > select dba_segments blocks where nom_segment = 'INS_COMMON_PARTY ';
BLOCKS
----------
479488
The 10046 trace file shows that each IO get back most of the time 16 blocks:
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 5619 = 27 dba first 1695088 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19115 tim = 4076488005225
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 33322 file number = 26 dba first 758658 block cnt = 14 obj = #= 19115 tim = 4076488044875
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 2140 file number = 26 dba first 758672 block cnt = 16 obj = #= tim 19115 = 4076488053342
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 205 file number = 26 dba first 758688 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19115 tim = 4076488054012
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 2057 file number = 26 dba first 758704 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19115 tim = 4076488056622
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 22034 folder = 26 dba first 758720 block cnt = 16 obj = #= tim 19115 = 4076488079117
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 5516 file number = 26 dba first 758736 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19115 tim = 4076488085001
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 4914 = 26 dba first 758752 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19115 tim = 4076488090434
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 7748 = 26 dba first 758768 block cnt = 16 obj = #= tim 19115 = 4076488098836
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 1046 file number = 9 first dba = 1411 block cnt = 5 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488101527
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 3882 = 9 first dba = 1424 block cnt = 8 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488105439
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 1736 file number = 9 first dba = 1433 block cnt = 15 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488107310
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 123 file number = 9 first dba = 1449 block cnt = 15 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488107616
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 876 of file = 9 first dba = 1465 block cnt = 15 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488108814
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 11326 = 9 first dba = 1481 block cnt = 15 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488120464
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 2497 = 9 first dba = 1497 block cnt = 15 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488123305
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 1382 file number = 9 first dba = 1513 block cnt = 15 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488125037
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 799 file = 9 first dba = 1529 block cnt = 7 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488126162
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 45 file number = 17 dba first = 1920 block cnt = 8 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488126533
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 2593 file number = 18 dba first 1794 block cnt = 14 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076488129290
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 1727 file number = 18 dba first = 1808 block cnt = 16 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488131202
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 7308 file number 18 dba first = 1824 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076488138872
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 514 = 18 dba first = 1840 block cnt = 16 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488139735
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 110 file number = 18 dba first 1856 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076488140232
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 114 file number = 18 dba first = 1872 block cnt = 16 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488140689
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 114 file number = 18 dba first 1888 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076488141146
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 113 file number = 18 dba first = 1904 block cnt = 16 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488141603
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 695 of file = 19 dba first 1794 block cnt = 14 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076488142645
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 549 of file = 19 dba first = 1808 block cnt = 16 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488143540
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 1742 file number = 19 dba first 1824 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076488145588
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 1834 = 19 dba first = 1840 block cnt = 16 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076488147769
................................
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 113966 = 19 dba first 52960 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492053842
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 3173 = 19 dba first 52976 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492057550
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 3486 = 19 dba first 52992 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492061390
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 2288 file number = 19 dba first 53008 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492064029
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 4692 = 19 dba first 53024 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492069069
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 1239 file number = 19 dba first 53040 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492070657
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = file number 2365 = 19 dba first 53056 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492073373
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 227 file number = 19 dba first 53072 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492073970
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 215 file number = 19 dba first 53088 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492074531
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 204 of file = 19 dba first 53104 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492075082
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 198 file number = 19 dba first = 53120 block cnt = 16 obj #= 19076 tim = 4076492075626
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 217 file number = 19 dba first 53136 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492076191
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 216 number of file = 19 dba first 53152 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492076755
WAITING #11529215045786738576: nam = "direct path read" ela = 1199 file number = 19 dba first 53168 block cnt = 16 obj = #= 19076 tim = 4076492078302
.......................................................
STAT #11529215045786738576 id = 5 cnt = 0 pid = 1 pos = obj 2 = 19076 op ='TABLE ACCESS FULL INS_COMMON_PARTY (cr = 478541 pr = 478534 pw = time 0 = US 98541439 cost = size 141729 = map 132638015 = 616921)'
To me that the number of e/s is about 479488/16 = 29968 e / s
Why is the number of e/s so close to the number of blocks?
Am I missing something here?
Thanks for your help
The column entitled "bed" is the number of blocks read, not the number of read requests.
Concerning
Jonathan Lewis
-
Hi all
In my database DVLUX226, in the alert logs, I get error ORA-19502. partners to archive newspapers. Here are the details:
Wed Apr 16 18:26:58 2014
Errors in the /INT1/sw/D/oracle/diag/rdbms/dvlux226/DVLUX226/trace/DVLUX226_arc1_22234.trc file:
ORA-19502: write error on file ' / INT1/arch/D/arch_1_1629_754400291.dbf ', block number 94209 (block size = 1024)
ORA-27072: IO file error
HP-UX-ia64 error: 2: no such file or directory
Additional information: 4
Additional information: 94209
Additional information: 638976
Wed Apr 16 18:27:11 2014
ARCH: Stopped archiving, error occurred. Will continue to retry
ORACLE Instance DVLUX226 - check-in error
ORA-16014: log 3 sequence # 1629 not archived, not available destinations
ORA-00312: wire 3 1 online journal: ' / INT1/oraredo2a/D/DVLUX226/redo03.log'
Errors in the /INT1/sw/D/oracle/diag/rdbms/dvlux226/DVLUX226/trace/DVLUX226_arc0_22231.trc file:
ORA-16014: log 3 sequence # 1629 not archived, not available destinations
ORA-00312: wire 3 1 online journal: ' / INT1/oraredo2a/D/DVLUX226/redo03.log'
SQL > select * from v version $;
BANNER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64 bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
CORE Production 11.1.0.7.0
AMT for HP - UX: 11.1.0.7.0 - Production Version
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
Please let me know how can I manipulate this alert as seems its related archive.
Kind regards
Michel
> - rw - rw - 1 int1orad s/n 99222528 Apr 15 15:27 arch_1_1628_754400291.dbf
> - rw - rw - 1 int1orad s/n 99222528 Apr 18 03:24 arch_1_1629_754400291.dbf
What happened between Apr 15 15:27 and 18 April 03:24?
-
What gets the relationship between the number of blocks and coherent?
QUESTION:SQL> CREATE TABLE TEST(ID INT ,NAME VARCHAR2(10)); SQL> CREATE INDEX IND_IDN ON TEST(ID); SQL> BEGIN 2 FOR I IN 1 .. 1000 3 LOOP 4 EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'INSERT INTO TEST VALUES('||I||',''LONION'')'; 5 END LOOP; 6 COMMIT; 7 END; 8 / SQL> EXEC DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS(USER,'TEST',CASCADE=>TRUE); SQL> SELECT DISTINCT DBMS_ROWID.rowid_block_number(ROWID) BLOCKS FROM TEST; BLOCKS ----------- 61762 61764 61763 >> above , there have 3 blocks in table TEST . SQL> SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY; SQL> SELECT * FROM TEST; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 1357081020 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1000 | 10000 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST | 1000 | 10000 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Statistics information ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 recursive calls 0 db block gets 72 consistent gets >> there have 72 consistent gets 0 physical reads 0 redo size 24957 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 1111 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 68 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 0 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1000 rows processed SQL> SELECT /*+ INDEX_FFS(TEST IND_IDN)*/ * FROM TEST WHERE ID IS NOT NULL; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 1357081020 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1000 | 10000 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST | 1000 | 10000 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 1 - filter("ID" IS NOT NULL) Statistics information ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 recursive calls 0 db block gets 72 consistent gets >> there have 72 consistent gets 0 physical reads 0 redo size 17759 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 1111 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 68 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 0 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1000 rows processed SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TEST; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 1950795681 ------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | | | 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST | 1000 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | ------------------------------------------------------------------- Statistics information ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 recursive calls 0 db block gets 5 consistent gets >> there have 5 consistent gets 0 physical reads 0 redo size 408 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 0 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TEST WHERE ID IS NOT NULL; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 735384656 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 4 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 4 | | | |* 2 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IND_IDN | 1000 | 4000 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 2 - filter("ID" IS NOT NULL) Statistics information ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 recursive calls 0 db block gets 5 consistent gets >> there have 5 consistent gets 0 physical reads 0 redo size 408 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 0 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed SQL> SELECT COUNT(ID) FROM TEST WHERE ID IS NOT NULL; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 735384656 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 4 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 4 | | | |* 2 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IND_IDN | 1000 | 4000 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 2 - filter("ID" IS NOT NULL) Statistics information ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 recursive calls 0 db block gets 5 consistent gets >> there have 5 consistent gets 0 physical reads 0 redo size 409 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 0 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed
What gets the relationship between the number of blocks and coherent? How to calculate become consistent?You can see that your uniform is getting down to 6 to 12, is it not? Reading of the below thread Asktom.
http://asktom.Oracle.com/pls/Apex/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:880343948514Aman...
-
Hello
I thought the column of blocks in user_segments table resresents WHERE the number of total block of the table. Thus, in user_tables total table blocks and empty_blocks must be equal to the value of the block in user_segments WHERE. However, the following results do not give the correct result. My hypothesis is false?
Select a.blocks, b.blocks, b.empty_blocks from user_segments WHERE a, b from user_tables
where a.segment_name = b.table_name and = b.table_name'ANSWERS;
blocks blocks1 empty_blocks 101376 97817 0 What is the difference between these two blocks in tables user_segments and user_tables WHERE columns?
Thanks in advance.
XXX_SEGMENTS always displays the image in real time. So yes, you'll see xxx_segments.blocks change as soon as the new extent is allocated to the table. But xxx_tables.blocks, empty_blocks, avg_row_legth, etc. are only updated if gather you stats or analyze table (and some of them only via analyze).
SY.
Post edited by: SolomonYakobson
-
iPhone 5 still rings for number of blocked list
I blocked several numbers of known telemarketers, for example (213) 266-7280 called me last Wednesday and I immediately went to the entry in the recent, tapped info, operated calling this block. The number is displayed as the last entry when I go into settings: phone: blocked.
Earlier, the phone rang and displayed in the form of the incoming number, (213) 266-7280. And indeed recent, that's it, two entrances, last Wednesday and today.
Why the phone does not have a number blocked through ring?
Note that this is not the same as the current thread about "don't it blocks just numbers or contacts. This isn't a problem here, the individual number is permanently blocked and it definitely sounds without worrying.
It's quite strange David.
If you have verified that the number is on the red list, I would say to delete the contact from the list and be add by removing the contact from your phone and re add and then add it to the blocked contact list.
(Be sure to include the full number with area code)
You would not be able to test and see if the problem is resolved, unless you get another call from the number.
To isolate the problem, I suggest to block another number and having to call and see if the same thing happens.
I hope you get this resolved because I can't survive without my block function lol.
-
Number of blocking outgoing calls with blackBerry Smartphones
new user - with BlackBerry 8520... How can I block my number when you call? THX, ak
Press your green dial key to enter the call log.
Press the Menu key > Options > General settings.
Scroll down to "restrict my identity = Yes.
And save.
-
Vista product id number difference.
Recently I bought Windows Vista through ebay, everything seems authentic, but I noticed that the identification of product under the barcode (on the label) does not match the number indicated on the page of the system. Can I assume that they should be the same?
Also when I enter the product key, I learned that it is already in use.
Good luck getting a refund just an info before you bid on something on ebay and I mean ANY article check percent from the seller of the positive results. Also read reviews that have left people like response from the seller to these comments, especially if they are negative.
-
Number of Dimensions of Essbase
Hello
Dimensions of 12 to 13 in Essbase too? (Block or global storage). I have a request for a database, but it seems that they want up to 13 dimensions.
I was told at one point that the optimal number was 9The question is, users will be able to load to the dimensions of the attribute using Excel?
^ ^ ^ Not that I know of. How do you see the attributes used against that? Attributes this fact projects and relationship id doc? Who's going to be difficult. I guess you could stick the two dimensions of attribute on the sheet, then remove the lack, then Pierce to zero in two dimensions with delete missing. That's assuming that you already have all the intersections of data defined.
Maybe it shouldn't be attributes, but rather real dimensions?
Could come you up with some type of partitioned (can be a partition of Essbase reall or some kind of ETL would be given export and import) approach where you wrote to a smaller cube with less information and wrote for the big one?
Or you could do something cool with Dodeca where you understand all relations between id doc and project and then this number just as the information on the worksheet. The relationship between the two dimensions, with a view to entry, could be dealt with in a relational back-end and then only the members that you want to appear in a form of input.
Kind regards
Cameron Lackpour
-
Why is there an outgoing call this morning from my iphone os SE 9.3.2 to a number that called my phone Friday unsolicited and which I blocked immediately? I got no call number. 1. how an outgoing call could be made from my phone? 2 is not a number of blocking prevents the contact incoming or outgoing? What should do?
Contact your operator.
-
BlackBerry Smartphones to block a phone number...
Hey people... Marvin here with a blackberry curve 8530...
Can someone tell me how to block a phone number, so I don't get the text or calls from this number?
Thank youMy wife uses Mr. number Call Blocker, she likes it.
If I remember correctly, there is a free and paid version.
You can not do this blockage in the native operating system.
-
REQUEST FOR PLANNING OF EMP - NUMBER POTENTIAL FOR HUGE BLOCKS
Hello world
I'm having a very hard time understanding the potential number of blocks, we have an application created with active CAPEX, here are the dimension planning, all are sparse dimensions, only account and time dimensions are dense:
Dimensions: members stored
Account 132
Period 14
Cost center 210
year 17
Details of the assets 2576
Entity 30
410 asset class
Currency 3
Scenario 7
Version 5
HSP_Rates 6
In order to get the size of the block, I calculate the two dense dimensions which is on about: 14784 bytes
In order to calculate the number of blocks that can I have to multiply scattered sizes stored (210 * 17 * 2576 * 30 * 410 * 3 * 7 * 5 * 6) = 71262283680000-> if I see it in the statistics of the easconsole show me tab a different value of 127640304247680 this value is greater then from above (no idea)
the potential blocks are huge, and I don't know if there is a problem with the design because if you turn on capex and then add class and the details of the assets and imagine that a society is to have 10000 assets when that happens? can someone please guide me if we have forgotten something maybe we don't him have not properly configured OR it's just the number and we can ignore it (I've already raised this with the support of the Oracle)
I hope that it is EMP gurus out there who can address this issue...
Thank you
Concerning
Shahrukh
This is the number of blocks, it does not mean that you will load data from all potential blocks.
This is a guideline and the rest fell to application design.
See you soon
John
-
ORA-19599: block number 782 is corrupt in the backup piece
Hi Experts,
I use Database 11g & restore the backup to another location.
RMAN > RESTORE CONTROLFILE FROM ' / u01/RMAN/forstandby_0acekubq_1_1 ";
RMAN > catalog starts by ' / u01/RMAN /';
RMAN > restore database;
channel ORA_DISK_1: backup/u01/RMAN/forstandby_09ceku8r_1_1 piece reading
channel ORA_DISK_1: ORA-19870: error when restoring backup/u01/RMAN/forstandby_09ceku8r_1_1 piece
ORA-19599: number 782 block is corrupted in the backup/u01/RMAN/forstandby_09ceku8r_1_1 item
switch to the previous backup
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: = ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS =.
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of the restore command at 23/10/2012 19:24:11
RMAN-06026: some targets not found - abandonment of restoration
RMAN-06023: no backup or copy of the file 4 found to restore
RMAN-06023: no backup or copy of datafile 3 found to restore
RMAN-06023: no backup or copy of datafile 2 found to restore
RMAN-06023: no backup or copy of datafile 1 found to restore
What is the problem someone guide me...Hello;
Use this command to check potential physical and logical corruption:
RMAN> restore database validate check logical;In Oracle 11 possible to repair/recovery corrupted blocks.
This link should help:
http://www.oracleracexpert.com/2011/09/repair-block-corruptions-using-data.html
Block recovery is also possible.
This link should help:
http://www.oracleracexpert.com/2009/08/block-recovery-using-RMAN.html
Best regards
mseberg
Maybe you are looking for
-
How can I stop the download automatically all videos?
I have limited allocation of bandwidth and data, I need to be able to stop all the videos download automatically. What I like most is that any video that attempts to load any drive is stopped and I gives me the opportunity to play if I want.
-
Why is Firefox site identification information memory when it is configured to not?
For these two days, the sites that I am logged in show credentials cached so that I don't have to enter the user name or password. I specifically set up for not remembering passwords of Firefox and I block websites to remember information. I also coo
-
Hello I'm new to the forum. I recently bought an Envy 14 spectrum with an i5 3317u and 4 GB of ram... I have yet to receive it.I watched some videos on YouTube showing that this laptop has a second msata for an additional ssd slot and a slot ram sing
-
I did experiment with the Panel before auto logging feature, I have no bad to save data to a file in a vi and recover, BUT I can't seem to be able to delete the log file of the top-level vi. I get the message file that is already open, but I don't s
-
cannot network wirelless connection. Help
I have a dell inspiron lap top that I can't connect to my wireless network my wireless have 10 characters but the wireless won't take 8 characters, how can I take 10 characters. Help