Expand the error handling in AIA

Similar Questions

• find errors returned by the error handler simple vi

  When running the application in the development environment and after the application of the error handler code, I found would be Manager of simple errors that VI is a few errors which I do not know where on the block diagram the source code. Is it possible to find it?

  Kind regards

  I think I have strength to my self more clear in my post earlier. So here's the explanation:

  I have a few variant to the data functions in the while loop of a block diagram. When I now run my code after the implementation of the code of error handler I get errors. One of the ways I could think now to find which variant of function data is wired content type incorrect data is to run the vi Analyzer and find in the report generated by the vi Analyzer.

  Lets see how it goes.

• Access the body of the original message in the error handler

  Hello everyone,
  
  The proxy service loanGatewy3 in the tutorial of the OSB uses a step in the request for validation pipeline. If a validation error occurs the error handler reports the original message body using a reporting action.
  
  Now, if an error occurs inside the node of routing; and if an error handler is set to report the original message ($body), the activity in question reported the error, not the original message. It seems that the $body variable contains the wrong answer instead of the original message. So is there a way to access the original request within a node $body error handler?
  
  Best regards
  Tarek

  You can always put the original message in a variable fictitious $origMessage, then in the case of an error on $origMessage report not $body

  see you soon
  James

• Declaration of Action in the error handler

  We have an obligation to use action of reporting in the Service error handler to capture some details for the reports. We use the Proxy in this transportation options and JMS messaging, we use 'Transaction' as activated to retry messages that have failed.
  
  Now if ever he flow fails and goes to the service error handler and there is no report get generated in the "operations-> e-mail reports. But when the 'Transaction' option in transportation options is disabled in the Proxy, we are receiving reports.
  
  Is it possible to get the reports generated with the option of 'Transaction' enabled?

  Then your provider reports is managed within the same XA transaction as your agent. Validate them or the two rollback. If you want to error report that you can always use XA transactions for your proxy server, but you cannot use it to your provider reports.

• Discovers the error handler when connecting

  OK, I installed View manager on windows 2008. (It's on a clone of windows 2008 vm)... I keep getting the error "access to administrator display error. Contact the system administrator. »

  What I've done so far:

  1 newsid.exe (crushed my vm - had to re clone)

  2 go out field and added to the domain re (did not work)

  3 used SYSPREP (re sid punt, changed, still the same error)

  4 re installed the Manager of the display after the removal of active directory

  5. brain blow gun charge

  Any other suggestions? Thank you.

  Wake the computer from the domain

  Remove the card Ethernet settings of the virtual machine

  generate a new SID of the machine

  Add the new network card

  Join to the domain - must be successful

  Install the broker - should be allowed

  Access display with good permissions administrator - should be allowed

  If the above doesn't work for you, there must be something serious about your Setup. In this case try to deploy the new Machine Custom spec and creation of SID.

• How to add sound to the General error handler

  I'm looking for an easy way to create a sound signal (beep or something) when the General error handler displays an error message.  Someone at - it suggestions?

  Hi Bill,

  make a shell vi containing the error handler and an additional function of "beep". And that's...

• In the portal Builder error handling

  Hi all

  I use a 11.1.1.9 portal generator. I wanted to ask, how we can make the error handling. Should we use standard error pages webcenter or use html navigate in the web server. Please guide me. What are the options for this.

  Can use us model taskflow exception handler to navigate to the error page. Please suggest your experience.

  There are several ways to achieve this.

  1. to use the error page standard webcenter. You can also customize which.

  2 use webgate to redirect to the error page. You can also set this in the web.xml file

  3. as you suggest that you want to have the error page for each page. I'll tell you design design for your application to set exception management.

  -Create custom exception handler class. Is just less than the class for example. You can write several method to redirect the error page in the taskflow model. This will be used when you want to access the standard or common portal error page all the

  as below

  package de.ba.techartifact.common.exception;

  import java.util.logging.Level;

  Import oracle.adf.share.logging.ADFLogger;

  Import oracle.adf.view.rich.context.AdfFacesContext;

  /**

  * {@code techartifactExceptionHandler} class and its subclasses are a form of

  * {@code Throwable} indicating conditions that a reasonable person

  * application can catch.

  *

  *

  {@code Exception} class and subclass which is not also

  * subclasses of {@link RuntimeException} are audited

  * exceptions.  Checked exceptions must be reported in a

  * method or {@code throws} clause the manufacturer so they can be thrown

  * by executing the method or the constructor and spread outside

  * the limit of the method or constructor.

  *

  * @author David

  */

  public class techartifactExceptionHandler extends RuntimeException {

  private final static ADFLogger logger = ADFLogger.createADFLogger (techartifactExceptionHandler.class);

  private static String errorId = "errorId."

  @SuppressWarnings("compatibility:7733281042864677431")

  private static final long serialVersionUID = 1 L;

  public techartifactExceptionHandler() {}

  }

  /**

  @param errorMessage

  */

  public techartifactExceptionHandler (String errorMessage) {}

  Super (ErrorMessage);

  }

  /**

  @param throwable

  */

  public techartifactExceptionHandler (Throwable throwable) {}

  Super (Throwable);

  }

  /**

  @param string

  @param throwable

  */

  public techartifactExceptionHandler (String, string, Throwable throwable) {}

  Super (string, throwable);

  }

  /**

  @param erroMessage

  @param throwable

  @param exceptionLevel

  */

  ' public void techartifactLogMessage (String erroMessage, flat exceptionLevel, throwable Throwable) {}

  Logger.log (exceptionLevel, erroMessage, throwable.getMessage ());

  }

  /**

  @param erroMessage

  @param exceptionLevel

  */

  ' public void techartifactLogMessage (String erroMessage, level exceptionLevel) {}

  Logger.log (exceptionLevel, erroMessage);

  }

  /**

  @param erroMessage

  @param throwable

  @param exceptionLevel

  @param fehlerId

  */

  public static void techartifactExceptionHandle (String erroMessage, Throwable throwable, level of the exceptionLevel,)

  String fehlerId) {}

  AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance () .getPageFlowScope () .put (errorId, fehlerId);

  Logger.log (exceptionLevel, erroMessage, throwable);

  }

  }

  If you want error page for each site. simple set exceptionhandler in any activity seen in the taskflow for each site.  It will display the error page different for different portal.

  We hope to answer your question. If you need more details let me know

• In the adf error handling

  Hello

  I have a problem with the error handling in the ADF.

  I use 11.1.2.2 version.

  I've got ApplicationModule Impl in Java and several inside method.

  In my managed bean I invoke an ApplicationModule method by using this code:

  BindingContext bindingContext = BindingContext.getCurrent();
  BindingContainer bindings = bindingContext.getCurrentBindingsEntry();
          
  OperationBinding opBinding = bindings.getOperationBinding("myMethod");
  opBinding.execute();
  
  // here I want to check whether everything is OK, but I cannot, because of exception in line above and 500 server error
  

  myMethod() code is:

  public void myMethod() throws JboException {
  try {
  //something with exception
  } catch(Exception e) {
      throw new JboException(e);
  }
  
  }
  

  and the code as it always causes 500 internal server because of the exception error in the model layer. How to handle correctly?

  Hello

  If you are using page fragments then check out the link below can help u

  Andrejus Baranovskis Blog: Flow the exception handler for method calls within the task of the ADF Fragments

  If your using jspx pages do check what

  Andrejus Baranovskis Blog: Flow the exception handler for method calls within the task of the ADF Pages

  Thank you

  Nitesh

• error handling - when using 'base' no updates to the audit table

  Hello;
  We use the error handling via the shadow errors; the operating mode is set by default to the "game";
  errors are caught in the trap in the errors table, but the audit of execution messages show is no longer there was error;
  y at - missing something on the shelf upward?
  before implementation of the error, with the operation mode table ' set to the line according to fail based on ' errors were recorded in all_rt_audit_exec_messages;
  now with the switch, the errors are caught in the trap, but we warned is no longer that it was a mistake;
  ID appreciate advise on how to fix that
  THX
  Rgds

  Hello

  Mode set-based, Oracle Warehouse Builder generates a single SQL statement that treats all data and performs all operations. Although the treatment of the data as a whole improves performance, audit information available are limited. Runtime auditing is only limited to the account of the run-time error. With mode based on the game, you can not identify lines that contain errors.

  Cap 10. Understand the Performance and Advanced ETL of Oracle® Warehouse Builder of modeling, ETL and data quality Guide data
  11g Release 2 (11.2)

  See you soon

• What is your strategy to find errors that are not triggered by the WebService error handler?

  Is there a way to underride the default functionality of WebService.as? I can't find the source code in the SDK, so I guess that this part of Flex is not Open Source.
  
  I find that the use of Web services there are many errors that potentially happen that I can't capture in the user interface. Alternatively, let me rephrase, I couldn't find a way to capture in the user interface.
  
  For example, the error message "Unable to load the WSDL" following occurs. Now, I could probably design a strategy all about check that the connection is still alive and these, but then I saw the other errors that occur in the WebService base classes that are all asynchronous licensees.
  
  Is it possible to add a default handler than capures these types of errors? (They aren't catches by FaultHandlers).
  
  I can't have a user interface that displays the large white box to end-users with a stack trace. Thank you.
  
  [FaultString = "Unable to load the WSDL" RPC error faultCode = "Server.NoServicesInWSDL" faultDetail = "no < wsdl:service > element in WSDL to." "]
  to mx.rpc.wsdl::WSDL/getService() [E:\dev\flex_3_beta3\sdk\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc \wsdl\WSDL.as:256]
  to mx.rpc.wsdl::WSDL/getPort() [E:\dev\flex_3_beta3\sdk\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\ws dl\WSDL.as:182]
  to mx.rpc.soap::WebService/ http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal:wsdlHandler () [E:\dev\flex_3_beta3\sdk\framewor ks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\soap\WebService.as:267 ]
  at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction()
  at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
  to mx.rpc.wsdl::WSDLLoader/checkLoadsOutstanding() [E:\dev\flex_3_beta3\sdk\frameworks\projec ts\rpc\src\mx\rpc\wsdl\WSDLLoader.as:195]
  to mx.rpc.wsdl::WSDLLoader/resultHandler() [E:\dev\flex_3_beta3\sdk\frameworks\projects\rpc\s rc\mx\rpc\wsdl\WSDLLoader.as:173]
  at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction()
  at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
  to mx.rpc::AbstractInvoker / http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal:dispatchRpcEvent () [E:\dev\flex_3_beta3\sdk\fra meworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\AbstractInvoker.as:175 ]
  to mx.rpc::AbstractInvoker / http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal:resultHandler () [E:\dev\flex_3_beta3\sdk\framew orks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\AbstractInvoker.as:198 ]
  at mx.rpc::Responder/result() [E:\dev\flex_3_beta3\sdk\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\Res ponder.as:48]
  at mx.rpc::AsyncRequest/acknowledge() [E:\dev\flex_3_beta3\sdk\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx \rpc\AsyncRequest.as:81]
  to DirectHTTPMessageResponder / completeHandler ([E:\dev\flex_3_beta3\sdk\frameworks\projects\ rpc\src\mx\messaging\channels\DirectHTTPChannel.as:387])
  at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction()
  at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
  at flash.net::URLLoader/onComplete()
  

  I discovered the programmers, that when I do not use the debug version of the player that those mistakes should properly propagate to the error handler.

• Error handling... Users or roles?

  Hi all
  
  I'll put in place the management of errors for the AIA. The instructions State the following:
  
  To create user error management roles:
  
  + 1. Access the Console of Administration Oracle WebLogic Server: http:// < host >: < port > / console. +.
  
  + 2. In the domain Structure menu, click Security Realms. +
  
  + 3. In the areas of Security Summary page, select myrealm. +
  
  + 4. On the settings page for myrealm, select the users and groups. +
  
  + 5. Select the users tab. +
  
  + 6. Create and modify user roles for use with the error handling framework. Error handling the notification and task list functionality to work as expected, make sure that you not use groups and user roles. +
  
  If I am on the 'Users' page, then I create users roles. If I were to create a role, then I would go to the tab of "Kingdom of roles." That's when we create user accounts that represent roles? I'm confused.
  
  See you soon

  Roles in 10g are now users in 11g. Even the terms document this role, but it's user. I also found these rarely documented.
  Oracle must document its share AIA ErrHandling elabolated more

  This could be something hint: How to use roles to send e-mail Notification to multiple in 11 g users

  Published by: panks July 12, 2011 17:56

• General error handling question

  So far, I've been able to intercept errors if I standard VI of wire in order (for example file IO) and handle errors in this way.

  Can I really take my code for errors without such wiring?

  For example, write on the Board that VI is not a mistake. If I leave the path to the empty file, I get an error, but no way to catch them. If my sub - VI generate errors and error ports, I'm fine. If they are not, I have no means to capture the error. Is this correct?

  Is there a way magic of creating a cluster of error with a TRUE value whenever an error anywhere (main or sub - VI), or is it wishful thinking?

  Thank you!

  If you want the treatment of errors in the file IO, you can make your own using the lower level file tools. They have all the error handling.

  You can open the worksheet screws and inspect the code if you wish. Make bring changes, then save them under a new name.

  Also do not forget that it is the management of automatic errors (enabled by default), then the screws worksheet will trigger a popup of error (most often unwanted!) if it occurs inside.

  Many functions have no errors (for example more basic numeric operations) and a lot of mistakes is not relevant. You should try to catch errors that really matter. Do not forget that the tail all a thread long error will require sequential operations and prevent so potentially the compiler optimization and parallel execution on multicore systems. One of the great powers of LabVIEW is the ease of parallel, simultaneous operation, so do not too throw a lot of sand in the gears.

  And, to answer your question, there is no magic way to add function error hydrants that isn't them. You can however wrap them in your own subVIs where you have sanity check on entries and exits, go into/out of the function without error. (for example check because "not a path" out "write on a spreadsheet file", empty array that comes out 'read the worksheet file', and/or place an explicit 'file dialog' in front of them and grab the flag cancelled, etc..)

• Multi-threaded error handling method

  I have a multi-threaded application.  When an error occurs in one of the wires causing the failed system, all threads will raise an error and display an error dialog box.  I think on the withdrawal of the appeal to the error handler in the secondary threads and instead send the error for the main thread to the provision.  Is this a common model?  Is there a better way to do it?

  kc64 wrote:
  I have a multi-threaded application.  When an error occurs in one of the wires causing the failed system, all threads will raise an error and display an error dialog box.  I think on the withdrawal of the appeal to the error handler in the secondary threads and instead send the error for the main thread to the provision.  Which is a common model?  Is there a better way to do it?

  Not as common as it is MUST.

  We use a logger who passes all errors to a background process that connects to produce for examination later. This is the minimum. If a fatal errors then adjust us the design of the application respond accordingly when bad things happen.

• Error handling process

  Hello
  
  I started using a process to manage the final DB in our APEX applications transactions as I used to use a validation and a process with the null value; because error of process management is not very friendly to provide error messages.
  
  I have little of which here is a code snippet
  

  declare
  
    ex_error         EXCEPTION;
    v_Value          NUMBER := 0;
  
  begin
    for i in 1..APEX_APPLICATION.G_F01.COUNT loop
      v_Value := APEX_APPLICATION.G_F01(i); --Radio group
    end loop;
  
    IF v_Value = 0 OR v_Value = '' OR v_Value is null THEN
      :P10_MESSAGE := 'You must select an item';
      raise ex_error;
    END IF;
  
    :P10_MESSAGE := 'Process worked ok';
  
  end;

  IM wondering the correct way to handle errors in a display of a dynamic error message depending on where the code ends. I tried to assign an error message I'll on a hidden item P10_MESSAGE and then use it in the message of success and failure as & P10_MESSAGE. but the value assigned to the hidden element does not show, as if it has been lost due to the exception raised, if the code works however the hidden element displays the process worked ok
  
  Request Express 4.1.0.00.32
  
  
  Concerning
  
  Graham

  Graham

  Since you are in 4.1, why not use the [url http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23903_01/doc/doc.41api /e21676/apex_error.htm#BGBEEGIB]apex_error

  You can not only set your own level of demand and the error handling page.
  But ADD_ERROR procedures give you the possibility of an increase in errors customized with personalized messages.

  Nicolette

• Error handling OSB

  Hi all
  
  I'm trying to raise an error to the calling service, I've added the fault element in the wsdl of the proxy service, but each time the error is thrown instead of get the my messsage of OSB error raises its own structure of fault as shown below. How can I replace this failure with my structure of fault structure in my wsdl file. I know how to replace the values of the fault of the OSB, what I need is how to replace the structurre of the fault itself. Kindly help me
  
  
  < soapenv:Envelope = "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:soapenv >
  < soapenv:Body >
  < soapenv:Fault >
  soapenv:Server < faultcode > < / faultcode >
  < faultstring >
  BEA-382500: OSB services legend received action response SOAP Fault
  < / faultstring >
  < detail >
  < con xmlns:con: fault = "http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/context" >
  < con: errorCode > BEA-382500 < / con: errorCode >
  < con: reason >
  OSB services legend received action response SOAP Fault
  < / con: reason >
  < con: details >
  < con1:ReceivedFaultDetail xmlns:con1 = "http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/stages/transform/config" >
  < con1:faultcode > soapenv:Server < / con1:faultcode >
  < con1:faultstring > BEA-380000 < / con1:faultstring >
  < con1:detail >
  < con: fault >
  < con: errorCode > BEA-380000 < / con: errorCode >
  < con: location >
  < con: node >
  RouteToManageProductOfferingAvailabilityTargetProvCS
  < / con: node >
  pipeline response - < con: path > < / con: path >
  < / con: location >
  < / con: fault >
  < / con1:detail >
  < / con1:ReceivedFaultDetail >
  < / con: details >
  < con: location >
  < con: node >
  ManageProductOfferingAvailabilityATGReqCSPipeline
  < / con: node >
  < con: pipeline >
  ManageProductOfferingAvailabilityATGReqCSPipeline_request
  < / con: pipeline >
  < con: Stadium >
  ManageProductOfferingAvailabilityATGReqCSStage
  < / con: Stadium >
  request pipeline - < con: path > < / con: path >
  < / con: location >
  < / con: fault >
  < / details >
  < / soapenv:Fault >
  < / soapenv:Body >
  < / soapenv:Envelope >
  
  
  Thank you
  Arun

  Ok. A WSDL fault is stored in a SOAP fault as an input 'detail '. Apart from this detail, the soap fault has a code error and fault string, which you can customize.
  For this implementation, steps would be quite similar to what I posted above.
  1. create a X-Query that defines the fault as below-
  
  Code you want
  Error message
  
  
  
  

  2. in the error handler to assign the output of X-query created in step 1, to a temporary variable
  3 replace the contents of $body with the temporary variable created in step 2 (make sure that soapenv:Fault is the immediate child of the node body)
  4. answer with success

  Try the above steps and let us know the result please.

  Kind regards
  Anuj