Exports of better quality?

Similar Questions

• is it good to create dataguard or import/export is better for getng reports

  Hi all
  
  
  I want to help experts... suggest me to generate reports in DB... I need to create new DB... is good to create DATAGUARD or import/export of new DB DB.
  
  THANK YOU FOR HELPING ME

  Your report takes too much time on your RAC database production, therfore you want to run the report on a different database?
  I stop questioning the purpose of this requirement and to focus on the technical aspects of the solution, although I strongly suspect
  You should review the requirement and think of more conventional methods to speed up the report.

  You take another server with similar or better quality equipment or a lot less load than your production server.
  Install Oracle Sources on it
  To implement an Oracle Net connection to your production server
  Clone your database of prod on this server (simple RMAN duplication)
  Run the report here
  compare the runtime

  If you have done this, and the runtime is to your complete satisfaction - go on your preferred option as discussed previously.

  Kind regards
  Uwe Hesse

  http://uhesse.WordPress.com

• When Apple will release a better quality, lossless CD quality service Apple music streaming?  Have just tried Tidal, sound quality difference is huge

  When Apple will release a better quality, lossless CD quality service Apple music streaming?  Have just tried Tidal, sound quality difference is huge. Frustrated that I won't subscribe and run multiple services. Apple

  Probably like most people won't lose their cellular data so that a better quality. Yes - I realize you're probably talking about streaming on a computer (that you're this announcement in music from Apple on Mac forum - but I don't think that the majority of their clients planned worry enough for them to invest in the infrastructure to provide this service.

  Now, I could be wrong - were repeatedly in the past.

  Perhaps leave comments for apple? :http://www.apple.com/feedback/

• Aurora-R4, seeking to upgrade power supply for a better quality of power supply that is not a brand of Dell?

  OK, I have a R4 Aurora, and in my view, that it comes with a power supply of 875 watt. Not 100% about this though. For now, I want to upgrade the power supply to a power supply, so it can support say double cards video in better quality SLI mode. The problem is that the PSU 875 does not have a rail system unique to 12 volts to 50 amps of power support to handle difficult loads of power and provide ample cooling in the power supply. What I would do in the future, it is out of the current PSU, I now and looking to buy a decent POWER supply unit elsewhere. Reference Dell sells a power supply higher than I can use existing wiring, or should I find another brand of PSU and seek to replace the power wiring? And how is it difficult to install if I have to use a different power supply with a different wiring? Installation instructions?

  2015 edit: Joe got his Alien running on an XFX Pro1250 you read, while the mine is running on the twin PSU Seasonic x 1250, here with a case modded haress:

  • The ALX files: a triad of power exchanges. Area-51 Aurora XPS 730 x... How to make a R1.44 of Area 51, using the value of r2 New 1440w Delta... Lessons in exchanging PSU Done Right
  • http://en.community.Dell.com/Owners-Club/Alienware/f/3746/t/19618380

  I typed my answers below Joe right B4 my Alien arrived last fall & b4 I got much Aurora psu swap knowledge or experience; What follows is an IdeaStorm on how to game-plan & handle swap psu Aurora, with a forum for archives where last year not too many messages in-depth existed on the subject, & Joe here desktop & my own experience of swap, details surface as others have done swaps using the accumulated knowledge we all collection / post in our success stories.

• A method which would result in a better quality?

  I have a great video/animation I want to export of EI. Should I export via the Quicktime Animation codec and compress to H.264 format then via handbreak or export directly as H.264 would produce better results?

  In the case of the former: can anyone recommend the best settings that preserve the quality of the original codec?

  If you use GPU improves rendering traced the RADIUS, it is always best to go to a good digital intermediate and then compress for delivery by using one of the Adobe Media Encoder presets. If you have data rates, that you are trying to hit can change the data rate in the SOUL.

  If you have not mapped to the RADIUS comps in your project, then you can render an AE comp directly in Adobe Media Encoder. It is the way I work most of the time. If I need several different broadcast formats the I'll make a DI and export variants in the SOUL.

• Help ~! Adobe Premiere Pro exports the poor quality video...

  I'm testing in order for use to YouTube videos of Adobe Premiere. No matter what I do, the problem I have, it is the quality of the exported video, doing not well and it's frustrating... = me '(je voudrais que quelqu'un qui sait ce qui pourrait se passer à me dépanner ici!)

  Therefore, the screen that I was working. This character, I drew... I'm trying to use it in the clip. The left is the original, right, how he showed first upward instead (a little too zoomed in). Accordingly, I decided to reposition him and him a bit fits back in effect... not too bad so far.

  So as I said, this was just a test clip so I tried even second-clip. This export press, I made the following adjustments:

  
  No. correspond to the parameters of the sequence

  Format: H.264
  Screening: YouTube HD 1080 p 23.976

  Yes , export the video and export audio

  No Gaussian blur

  Width 1 920
  Height 1 080
  Frame rate: 23.976
  Order on the ground: progressive

  Appearance: Square Pixels (1.0)

  TV standard: NTSC
  Profile: high

  Level: 4.0
  No. made to maximum depth

  Encoding Bitrate: VBR, 2 pass
  Target Bitrate: 15
  Maximum flow: 25
  Yes distance keyframe: 72

  No Maximum render quality
  N use found
  No. interpolation

  With that, I queue it and export it to my office, no other changes. After I saw this however... it is really blurry. It seemed to me that if the video demoted to 240 p.
  

  I would like to help with this, I would like to make my videos much more crisp and sharper than that... the image itself has been designed around 500 x 800 pixels, so there should not be a problem with the picture itself (I think)...

  Help meh!
  -Supy

  Well, we found the problem! You start with an image of HD quality, stuffing in a sequence to only 720 x 480 DV, losing more quality... and then export the image shrunk down is actually jumping again HD.

  If you intend to export at 1080 p, then sequence settings must also be 1080 p. Think of a sequence like a picture frame. If you have a photo 8 x 10, you need, for example, a frame 8 x 10, not a 4 x 6.

  Please use file > New > sequence, then AVCHD 1080 p > and then decide what rate to deliver, 30 or 24, and then choose a preset suitable to work with. What frame rate you select, and then use the same for export (in reality, it is rate of 29.97 or 23.976, rounded names for simplicity).

  Thank you

  The f

• Issue. : Compression abnormally high during export at 100% quality

  My raw 23 MP files is exported 100% quality to 4.2 mp or less. I need a file size of 8 to 10 mp. How to solve this

  I guess that I am not convinced in light of the statement of the problem error.

  Still, the question you need to answer is that the photo has large areas of relatively uniform or no color, or if the photo has a lot of details. These compress differently.

• export the original quality of the media

  How to export media to the original size of clip and the quality?

  Rob leea81087040 says:

  Thank you... so when first exported in MPEG, it loses any quality?

  YES!

  This is the Preview codec used in the sequence. Less sound quality and can be used for other quick export while I wouldn't use the Match sequence settings but use a preset or make my own settings.

• Export in best quality

  Hello

  I've recently set up a blog and I was wondering what export settings are the best to use for web content.

  After reading several explanations on JPEG and PNG, I was not a little further.
  So far, I exported all my RAW photos with Save as-> JPEG-> quality and finished with 12 MB sizes. Now, I've read, that the size of the image should not exceed 400-500 KB?

  
  Grateful for your help.

  
  Best,

  Bela

  I would keep the master psd file. Or if space is a consideration, flattened and save in PNG or Tiff. PNG using lossless compression and you can generate a jpeg of size of him as necessary. If you want to go with file > save as > Jpeg, keep it to 10. I doubt you will see a difference of 12 max.

  You don't want to resave JPEG files, they lose quality that way.

  Essentially if you think you re - use this image, keep copies of archives. With cheap storage as it is, a 1 TB external drive would be practical.

  Gene

• Export of poor quality in CC

  I just stumbled upon this problem from last night. I record videos from my office through Fraps - game and online software tutorials. I recorded with Fraps with the following parameters:

  • Video capture: 29.97
  • Loop buffer: 30 seconds
  • Framerate locked during registration (checked on)
  • My screen resolution is set to 1920 x 1080

  I've eliminated Fraps as the issue for the following reasons:

  1. my video video games are always very well, it's only the tutorials that have a degradation of quality when exporting

  2. my Fraps limpid eyes, Premiere Pro source files, both in view of the outside of Premiere Pro.

  After I wear my videos in Premiere Pro, edit and render, I then export with the following parameters:

  • Format: H.264
  • Screening: YouTube HD 1080 p 29.97
  • Frame rate: 29.97 (this is the default value of YouTube)
  • Order on the ground: progressive
  • Appearance: Square Pixels (1.0)
  • TV standard: NTSC
  • Profile: high
  • Level 4.0
  • Encoding Bitrate: VBR, 2 Pass
  • Target bit rate: 8Mbps (I tried maxing bitrate to 300 with no luck)
  • Max Bitrate: 8Mbps (same here)
  • The key frame distance: 90

  My software tutorials record from my Chrome browser (the software is software such as line/cloud - reports Adobe & Analytics to be precise). I have not encountered this problem until recently, and it has no impact on my game at all videos. Y at - it all I need to change the settings or is there something else? Here is a screenshot to look at how bad the video:

  

  two-pass h.264 encoding had problems with quality degraded in CC (7.0 and 7.0.1). The update that went live today should solve this problem. Please update, try again encoding and report here if the quality is up to par.

• What is the export of highest quality of a Premiere Pro sequence?

  I have a collection of Premiere Pro 5.5 projects I want to turn it into 1 project of Premiere Pro 5.5 (which I intend to turn it into a dvd). Each of the projects are Short film about 1-2 minutes each after the change.

  I tried to export a completed project (sequence 1) under a mpeg2 format, thinking it would give me good quality video and size (1440 x 1080). While the video quality is excellent, I have no audio. I made sure the audio checkbox for export has been verified, but no luck.

  Does anyone have any suggestions on that?

  N ° no need to make copies.

  Simply go to file / import and choose the files prproj.

  The media will reference all media of the original projects in their original folders. Easy as can be. Give it a try. It is nondestructive. You can't go wrong whatever it is. I promise you. The projects will each in their own bins. Just go look for sequences. I think that you will be satisfied with the results.

• Change the video source (even video but better quality)?

  Is it possible to change the video from the source of a project with another video which is exactly the same (same fps, same proportions, same time) video, but with better resolution, where all the changes on the last video source will remain on the new video source?

  My situation is that I found a version 720 p 480 p video, I worked (long) with.

  As Jim said, you can do outdoors.

  Sometimes we run with proxy support and who in the Proxy file with the quality full folder native (or ProRes).  You can either share the folder names, move files or in Premiere Pro, you can take the files offline then back online by right-clicking and choose reconnect media.

  This is the easiest part

  If you've been editing on a timeline of 480 p, then through 720 p images bringing you either have to change the settings for the sequence (you can also create a new sequence with the right settings, then copy/paste) or you need to tell Premiere Pro videos 720 p to 480 p sequence size nationwide.

• Is the checkbox 'use previews' then the export of output quality hurt?

  I know that if I click on the check box use the preview it considerably accelerates my record, but I was wondering if it lowers my quality of output on the final export?

  Well, then if the original is 1080, export as such.

• Project settings of the AVCHD for a better quality of DVD

  I used Pinnacle Studio Ultimate for the past five years with a lot of effects, transitions and rich text content.  I bought a Sony HXR-MC50U and recorded media are set at its highest potetial: AVCHD video format.

  Pinnacle has done OK with my same old technical until 45 min length has been reached. I then had a lot of breakdowns of the system.  I know that I can transcode to the good old AVI, but I want to preserve the quality of the video at its highest level.

  It is my first DVD of first Pro/Encore project.  Although I am new to the software, plugins Pinnacle are very similar and some are the exact same as hollywood fx plug-ins.  I realized the party edition as a piece of cake.  I'm stuck at the part of the project in again, so I'm here asking for HELP!

  System:

  Windows 7 x 64 professional

  Adobe CS4 Master Collection

  ASUS P8P67 motherboard

  Intel i5 2500 K 3.3 GHz O.C to 4.3 GHz

  16 GB of Ram GSkill DDR3 @2133

  nVidia Quadro CX with 1.5 GB of Ram

  WD Raptor 10 k RPM hard drive.

  850W PSU

  Current project and procedure parameters, I followed:

  1 - the project to create a new PR NTSC DVD HD

  2 - create new sequence: 1080i30 (60i) 1:1

  == > My AVCHD info: (24 Mbps) 1920 x 1080/60i 29.9 fps

  3 - Importeded video of the internal hard drive and adding clips to a timeline...

  4. - applied Adorage plugin Transitions, double cropped video screen next to a few points, etc...

  5 - created new sequence this time for securities and other display information

  6 - imported clips AVI 720 x 480 resized to the size of the image and created securities within the PR

  7 - new sequence to combine a total of 6 sequences with little video effects and about 1 hr 40 min length then added an audio track that overlap two or three short clips

  8 - all projects registered and selected Dynamic Link: sent to the settings still Blu - Ray 1920 x 1080/60i

  Once I got, I got a lot of 'fun' create a menu driven with 15chapters

  1 - created new timeline, timeline sequence added

  2 - created a new Menu and submenu and then published their text in Ps, rescued and return to en

  3 - Motion video added button in the submenu... double button, total 5 buttons

  4 - menu linked to all its sections corresponding, Next, Previous, hand Menu etc... In addition, background Audio croped on a length of the default value for the menu background video.

  5 - check project... Checked them all very well... Previewed and works nice

  6 - build the DVD Image, gave the image a name, selected directory and 'click '...

  After several tries, I managed the menus to render correctly and no mistakes over this point.  If until then "transcoding failed.

  I can make and PR, but the quality is considerably lowered.  The main reason I go to Pr is output as many on the final DVD-quality video possible.  I always create image to DVD using Pinnacle, first to save the blank media.  Then test the image and if it's OK I then burn with confidence.

  I've updated to the latest versions available all my programs. Pr I ran as administrator to ignore my stuff from the operating system security.

  It's been a long week and I hope that someone expert in Premiere Pro helps me understand this error.  I cannot transcode now, or build the project.  I get the same error: failure of transcode

  I noticed a red line on the timeline on parts of my project in Premier Pro when adding double video (50 50 screens), transitions, or other video effects.

  One last note, I save all my projects and final DVD Image to a server FTP of D-Link with drives mapped to my computer.  It is linked to a 10/100/1000Mps connection on my local network.  Pinnacle does not even notice that it is internal or network.  My read/write speed is the same or faster than hard drives internal: 40-60Mps... Change the folders on hard drive made no difference.

  First with a built-in mpeg2 dvd export.

  Import into Encore.

  Menu and export the image.

  See if this will help.

• Should I keep my size of the slightly larger image for better quality?

  I put my images at 60% quality JPG files from photoshop that seems to give a very nice representation.

  I created a site to make a full screen, so I expect to be greater on a larger screen so what I see on mine.

  I thought that to maintain each full-size image to 25% greater when the necessary finlal size in the layout, so if the site is never the larger screen then images have some stored resolution to be enlarged and receive an increase in size.

  So all mine images are resized to about 75%.

  It is a good practice or things don't work that way in Flash?

  It is perhaps preferable to keep the images at 100% (rather than import intentially enlarges images) but to make maximum quality? Or the two senses, kind of work?

  There is not a way to manipulate images is better for everyone.  more pictures, less pixelated they will appear when furred (use of smoothing) but the larger size and more they will take for a user to load.

  You must choose what meets your needs and that works best for you.