Flash CS5: Runtime Shared Library

Similar Questions

• Runtime Shared Library - please help

  Hi all

  I am very new to Flash, in fact this is my first Flash project and I have self taught myself how to use Flash.

  I have designed and created a banner online, I am extremely pleased with the results, although when I try to test my Flash movie, I get a message until it plays, saying my content will not steam, Runtime Shared Library...

  Here is a screenshot of the real message I get http://CL.LY/0p1w04153W1Q0k1U2J2W

  

  I tried to navigate to the settings it is said in the message, but I don't really know what I want or what I'm doing.

  If someone could be so good as to explain exactly what that means and how to fix?

  Kind regards

  James

  Hi James,

  Unless you have a type of animation in your fla to load first few frames you have really to worry about this message.

  This is a warning to those who try to spread their SWF and read before SWF animation has completely downloaded. Since it is a banner, it is probably no more then 30 k and so streaming is not a factor.

  Simply restore the TLF the default value and ignore this dialog.

  Through the dialog advanced settings of the ActionScript 3.0 > Library Path the default link value Runtime shared library (RSL)

  and download the .swz with your swf file.

  Kind regards

  Ken

• Adobe Flash CC: my shared library isn't here!

  Adobe Flash CC: my shared library isn't here. I am using the student Adobe CC edition and I'm trying to work with the built-in buttons, but they are not available. Is it possible I can recover the common tools of libraries?

  You will need to revert to a previous version, I believe than CS6, for as the Library button. All common libraries were dropped from Flash when it changed to a 64-bit application.

• Align problem fonts when they are imported from runtime shared library

  Hello

  I'm faced with a problem of police on the CC Flash and Flash 2014 version.

  I'm on PC, Windows 7.

  I have a first Flash using AS3 file, named lib_font.fla. In this first file, I have 5 symbols of fonts in the library:

  -all fonts are properly integrated.

  -all fonts are exported for runtime sharing

  -When I publish lib_font.swf, all right, the texts are displayed correctly

  

  I now have a second Flash scene, which imports just 5 fonts to lib_font.swf.

  On the main timeline, I simply put 5 different textFields:

  -> linked to the 5 different imported fonts.

  -> with a font size of 23 pts

  -> When I publish my swf 4 textFields will police base poorly aligned/shifted.

  I added the ascent of text to the text value to see what has been returned:

  

  You can note that:

  -> for all textfields buggy, rise of the text values will be '36.8'.

  -> for work textfield, text ascension is 21.95

  Now, if I simply remove the import for the fonts option listen to, the base line of text will be displayed correctly!

  

  It is not because of the police itself or incorporation options. Import for runtime sharing really breaks the behavior of fonts.

  Is there a solution?

  I finally found what was wrong with that!
  In fact, I had another swf which was exporting these fonts for TIME sharing, under the same URL.
  There was a kind of silence conflict between them.

• CS3 Runtime shared library link

  I'm new to the runtime shared libraries, so thought someone will see what obvious thing I am doing wrong.
  
  Given:
  
  1 created an Assets.swf with a MovieClip symbol exported with a link name called "Symbole1". "Export for actionScript", "Export for run-time sharing" and "Export in first frame" is checked them all. URL: 'Assets.swf '.
  
  2. created a Movie.swf that matters 'Symbole1' Assets.swf (using the dialog open external library).
  
  3. attached a Document class to Movie.swf containing Movie.as code attached below.
  
  Result: Two compiler errors:
  
  Movie.As, line 9 1046: Type was not found or is not a compilation contant: symbole1
  Movie.As, line 9 1180: call to a method may not set symbole1.
  
  Movie.As code:
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  

  I wonder why Adobe allows even the box "Export for runtime sharing" if she does nothing for AS3? This certainly lead me in the rabbit hole hurt trying to get this approach to work.

  In any case, I made the changes of code suggested to Movie.as (attached). Box off the 'export for runtime sharing' on symbole1 in Assets.fla. Levied on importation of symbole1 Movie.fla. And, of course, the importation of symbole1 works now. Thank you, kglad.

  So in summary, the two points that I missed were:

  Each exported symbol must have as a definition of the class associated with a .as file. If this symbol is imported using the AS3 "import" directive.
  Ignore the "Export for runtime sharing" mechanism entirely and use the Loader class.

• Runtime sharing URL in CC Flash is empty

  I do not know if everyone knows this, but it is seriously hinder our workflow:

  (1) we create a FLA that contains a bunch of components and graphics on the stage, with all that in the library of the export for DURATION value sharing project with unique names. We title the exported swf lib.swf.

  (2) we create a new FLA project and import a number of these files in the library in our new library.

  (3) I do a right-click on one of them and go to its properties and that it is checked Import for run-time sharing, but the URL is empty.

  (4) I enter lib.swf URL and click OK.

  (5) when I click with the right button on it and distributed to its properties, I see that once more it is checked as an import for the sharing of life, but the URL is empty.

  Sometimes I can compile even despite this, but usually I'm running an error in compilation where Flash tells me that there is no definition available for one of my Articles of imported library.

  This needs a fix, as soon as possible.

  Andres

  I had the same problem and found that if I set an absolute path or relative in the properties of the symbol, Runtime Shared Library, URL field, then the URL of the import has been postponed in the other document and everything worked properly. But if you put a simple file name in the URL field he does not get delayed and having the problem you describe.

• Bug in Flash CS5 - compiled Clips 3D rotation

  I found a bug in flash CS5, I was wondering if anyone else had this?

  
  This bug occurs in Flash CS5 creative compilation of clips that use the 3D rotation tool. It seems that if you attempt to convert a symbol that contains a 3D to a compiled clip transformation it will not work properly. What makes this problem worse, is that the error is not reported correctly and so it is almost impossible to debug.

  Steps to reproduce:

  1, create a new empty project to AS3.

  2, create a new symbol and call it 'sym1' place a shape of rectangle in it.

  3, create another symbol and call it 'sym2' place 'sym1' inside.

  4, now, while you are still editing sym2, select the instance of sym1 and access the 3D rotation tool - rotate 3d sym1.

  5, now right-click on sym2 in the library and go to "convert clip compiled", note the warning:

  «WARNING: 5002: image of the main timeline scripts have been ignored because a compiled clip contains a definition for fl.livepreview.LivePreviewParent.» To override the fl.livepreview.LivePreviewParent definition, place a custom in your classpath class file. »

  As you can see this warning message does not describe the problem precisely. Unfortunately, it is easy to accidentally add a 3-d rotation to a symbol without knowing. This has been a major issue for us and we had to spend several days to track down the problem.

  All I have this problem or knows how to get around it to allow a 3-d rotation compiled clips?

  * Update *.

  I just had a similar problem with the new TLF text in compiled clips. If we try to convert a compiled clip that contains TLF text, it throws the following warning:

  "WARNING: no library was linked as a Runtime Shared Library (RSL) because of your publication settings: compiled Clip.

  Thank you!

  Update of the TLF text added.

  The good news for you is that these two warnings are that: warnings. They are not errors, and both transactions must actually be completed with success, at least for the most part.

  The warning that you get with the 3D used in a symbol that you convert a compiled clip definitely looks like a bug. What is happening there is that normally when we export 3D, we add some automatically generated ActionScript in the document implementation of the transform.perspectiveProjection level. When you export a compiled clip, it attempts to add this code to the class LivePreviewParent, which it cannot do, and is not really what you want anyway.

  So the only real problem you get with the compiled clilps 3D, is that if you have ONLY 3D compiled clips (and not in any ordinary symbol) then the perspectiveProjection will not be configured correctly. The best way to solve this problem is to ensure that you have a FEW 3D somewhere onstage who isn't in a compiled clip. It might be something very small and simple, it is behind the scenes, it might even be something that is right on a frame and is a framework that you PLAY never really, but without some 3D that isn't a video compiled, you will not get the perspectiveProjection implemented correctly.

  As TLF, which is not a bug and is a warning provided, although it is a little cryptic so apologies for that. If you click the parameters of ActionScript in the document PI button and go to the Library Path tab, you should see below near the bottom that the default binding is set to Runtime shared library (RSL), which means that by default the implementation of TLF will be downloaded when running as a RSL. However for the clips compiled at the moment the automatic download of RSL does not work, so if you make a video compiled with TLF, then eventually change this setting to be merged into the code, and this warning is just trying to tell you that.

  It is a bit of a cause for concern, because the TLF library is not a small thing, and you would rather download it as an RSL. The RSL TLF is signed by adobe as a SWZ file, which means that flash player can cache in all applications that use it. So the idea is that, even if you download it as an RSL, it is unlikely that you really need to wait that he download, because the user has probably touched another site which he already used. So really it is ideal that if you can avoid putting TLF in compiled clips and therefore take advantage of the RSL, but if you can't, then everything should work well for you, you just a larger SWF file.

  I hope that these explanations made sense!

• Export Flash CS5 to Quicktime - why it does not work?

  I have a 2.93 Core 2 with 8 GB of RAM.

  I have a Flash video with text, graphics and animations. It's long 2 minutes. The SWF works fine. ActionScript 3.0. resolution 900 x 500.

  When I first attempted to export to quicktime, it gave a very close message that:

  «WARNING: Runtime Shared libraries (RSL) could not be associated with the file because of the publication settings Quicktime.»

  The wording may be a bit off, it's memory. Don't forget, that I'm not even publish at this point, I export. Not that I could make the difference.

  If, after the display of this message, the progress bar continues to fill up until it is completely filled, and then nothing happens. The juice bar is full, do nothing. For hours.

  So after that I've explored the parameters of publication, I found on the 'Flash' tab, a drop-down menu that allow me to choose "merge in code" as the integration of the Runtime Shared Library with the file. Then I hit publish. The progress bar fills up and disappears, press OK. Still, I can't find any movie file (or even the place where published GB of files) on my computer.

  After that, I try to export. The appeared before warning disappeared, but the progress bar always crashes when it is full, and no file is produced.

  One thing I thought is maybe it has to do with the number of images in my file. I inserted the action stop at the end, so the video stops and does not loop when previewing the SWF, however there are still many blank executives, which contain all objects or interpolations or something like that. The setting is currently 'stop encoding finally framework', which I guess means the last picture of my video before automatic shutdown. I can't find a way to make the empty frames after this point to disappear, I tell myself that it is part of the program itself.

  If anyone has other issues that will help in the face of this point, let me know.

  I searched these forums and is about 4 with the unanswered question, I can find no help anywhere else on the web either.

  If anyone knows of any other method to convert the SWF or FLA file about any other useful such as MPEG, AVI, etc., please let me know. I tried Media Encoder and After Effects, and none of them could help me to convert the file.

  
  Thanks in advance for any input about what you might have!

  Post edited by: elephantdesign

  When you select "when the last image is reached" for the option "Stop exporting", it will stop recording when the movie reaches the last frame of the movie. However, if you have "stop();" action in the context of the film, it stop the film, but continues to record the movie and the memory of your system runs. You can comment out the stop action or specify the duration of the recording control option "after a time' option 'stop export '. There is a tip on the optimization of the export of QuickTime in our site knowledge base: http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/401/kb401520.html. Thank you

• RSL Error 2046 when TERM-shared-library-path using Ant mxmlc

  Hi,.

  I build my project using the ant mxmlc with SDK 3.4 target

  If I < flex: mxmlc...-link-TIME-shared-library static = 'false' static-RSLS = "false"... >

  It works very well. My SWF is a bit lighter but not enough!

  If in my mxmlc, I add the following nodes (all of them or one of them)

  < runtime-shared-library-path

  Path-Element="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/libs/Framework.swc" >

  "< url rsl-url="${contextroot}/client/framework_3.4.0.6955.swz "/ >

  "< url rsl-url="${contextroot}/client/framework_3.4.0.6955.swf "/ >

  < / DURATION-shared-library-path >

  < runtime-shared-library-path

  Path-Element="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/libs/RPC.swc" >

  "< url rsl-url="${contextroot}/client/rpc_3.4.0.6955.swz "/ >

  "< url rsl-url="${contextroot}/client/rpc_3.4.0.6955.swf "/ >

  < / DURATION-shared-library-path >

  < runtime-shared-library-path

  Path-Element="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/libs/DataVisualization.swc" >

  "< url rsl-url="${contextroot}/client/datavisualization_3.4.0.9271.swz "/ >

  "< url rsl-url="${contextroot}/client/datavisualization_3.4.0.9271.swf "/ >

  < / DURATION-shared-library-path >

  I have a: Error #2046: the loaded file did not have a valid signature

  I thought: why not add summaries check = false to my target mxmlx?

  = > Unfortunately the ant task does not support this option

  I also read somewhere that this may be caused by the Decree of the library.

  It is true that in the case of the flex plugin for eclipse

  I put the first framwork.swc
  DataVisualization.swc and configure rpc.swc
  the EFA resulting works

  = > This makes me think that my swz are duly signed

  = > I can't find a way to make the swz ordering the ant target

  So is my only solution use the mxmlc commed-line within the ant?

  What can possibly be wrong?

  Only builds "Milestone" should have signed to RSL. The stable and nightly versions have not signed RSL. All signed RSL you might find in an Add ons download "Adobe" is there by mistake and should be ignored.

  -Darrell

• How can I add a library in Flash CS5

  I just installed flash CS5 and bind my folder with my extensive library classes, so they are always linked when I create a new Florida how a permanent link?  I can also bind. SWC files?

  Its in your preferences. Open the preferences panel, select Actionscript. In this Panel, you will find three places to set paths to your libraries and class files.

• Sharing graphics between several sovereign wealth funds (runtime sharing)

  I put in a quiz. I have a main .swf making requests to a server to get questions. The server then responds with a string of text is parsed, and the container issue is drawn on the screen. For example, the server may respond to the question "is the sky blue?" response = true '.

  My application would then create a box containing the question and two buttons labelled 'true' and 'false '. Each of these elements are drawn using various images of nine-patch that I include in the .swf file.

  My problem is the following. I want to include custom question formats. Instead of simple text, I want to add a question like 'click the blue square on this photo '. I plan do a bunch of these issues in Flash and export a .swf files. The server could then send one of these .swfs as well as issues of simple text.

  Some of these separate issues will contain elements (for example, buttons or text boxes) that I like to shoot in the same style as the questions that are created from scratch in the main application.

  I don't know what is the best way to achieve this. If I include the nine-patch images in each of the separate .swfs so surely I'll run into problems if I ever want to change the images. I have to recompile all the .swfs. I also want the user to be able to change the themes. It is easy to achieve if I swap on nine-patch images in the main application, but will be annoying otherwise.

  create one or more fla files that contain your (in) active symbol of shared.  in the library of the FLA, for each asset that needs to be shared: right click > click Properties > select export for runtime sharing and assign a class and a url.  (at least, to use a subdirectory of your main project directory because you cannot leave this field blank.)

  in all the SWF files that you want to use these common goods, create symbols (graphics are not relevant because they will be replaced by assets created in the fla above) > each symbol library you want to replace a right click > click Properties > check import for TIME sharing, assign a class name corresponding meanings that should replace this symbol and the use of the url the same subdirectory as above with the name SWF:

  

  

  in my swf file that contains the orange oval, all instances on the boards will be replaced by the green square.  at a later time if I wanted to use red squares, I would just change the symbol with the symbole1 class in my swf exporter to a red square.

• When you call a function in a shared library, are copied locally settings?

  I have a shared library with a function which the header is:

  void __cdecl nextevent (double entry [], int32_t len);

  When it is called it sends the values in [entry] to the input control:

  

  This vi is compiled into a DLL that uses the header above.

  Now, my question is: which of these operations is good:

  1. the input control is a reference to the entry in array [], no value is copied.

  2. the values of the Input [] array are copied into the input control, the local copy is used by the vi, then the values of the local copy is deleted/trimmed.

  It seems reasonable that 1 is good, but I can't be sure, and I see no way to check.

  For this particular case, option 2 is valid. The reason is that the tables of LabVIEW are not just pointers to a memory location but the handles. And there is no legal way to create valid LabVIEW handles of a runtime C allocated memory pointer. If LabVIEW transforms the table pointer entering a handle which is basically nothing else that allocate the handle with a sufficient size to contain all the data in the table and then copy the data from the table pointer in this handle. After the call, the handle is properly released.

• shared library problem MathScript

  I have a shared library of labview created in labview 8.2.1.  This labview dll contains a three functions, having to turn a number of mathscript embeded nodes inside of them.  The reason for their compilation in a shared library dll is because I want to call this dll of labview 7.0.  I have a test program of work created in labview 8.2.1 and labview 7.0.

  The problem I had is that these executables both run ok on my machine development, but when I move them to another machine with only the installed runtimes (7.0 and 8.2.1) labview dll function calls fail to do anything.  No errors appear, so it is very difficult to find where the problem occurs.    I have two different dll called in the example program.  The first dll just manages the file access and has not all the mathscript in bits, but the second, which is the one that I'm really interested in, has the mathscript node.  The memory usage in looking, I see it's the appeal of the file access dll but do not do the mathscript one.

  I have installed an evaluation version of labview 8.2.1 on this laptop with only the runtime, run the program and it works fine.  I think there must be something not in the dll but I don't see anything in the options to add something.  I have the mathscript check box selected in the build option.

  I know there are a number of functions that do not work with just running, but I'm not all there that use my program.

  Does anyone have advice?

  OK, I found the solution to my problem.  It was a problem with the version of the runtime that I used.  Labview CDs development is only a partial performance and include all of the files to run applications full (time to install it on his own).  Go to the website of national instruments, there is a period of standard edition which includes everything you need.  Download and install this version seem to have solved the problem.

• Is Linux - possible to build a shared library that calls other libraries shared without having to make a static link to them?

  Hello

  Operating system = Linux (Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 32-bit)

  I am building a shared library *. so.  This *.so should be used by LabVIEW.  This *.so is calling other functions in shared libraries.  In my case, the other library share is libxml2 and libz.  The only way I could compile my shared library and operate was a static link from libxml2.a and libz.a.  Is there a way to make a dynamic link?

  Here's the makefile file that I use.  The goal of 'TestValidateSchema' compiles the shared without the static link library and this shared library is called by an application to test 'c' and it works.  Now, to make it work in LabVIEW, I need to make a static link, as you can see in the target ' install: «otherwise the function "call library node" throws me a symbol unresolve...»»

  This is the only way to do it and if yes why?

  Thank you

  --------------------------------

  CC = gcc

  all: TestValidateSchema

  TestValidateSchema: testValidateSchema.c
  $(CC) o Release/validateschema.o - c - wall - Werror - fpic Src / validateschema.c - I. / Include-I/usr/include/libxml2
  $(CC) - shared-o./Release/libvalidateschema.so./Release/validateschema.o
  $(CC) - wall o ./release/testvalidateschema testValidateSchema.c./Release/validateschema.o-lxml2

  clean:
  $(RM) $(OBJS)./Release/testvalidateschema./Release/libvalidateschema.so./Release/validateschema.o /usr/include/validateschema.h /usr/lib/libvalidateschema.so

  install:
  $(CC) o Release/validateschema.o - c - wall - Werror - fpic Src / validateschema.c - I. / Include-I/usr/include/libxml2
  $(CC) - shared-o./Release/libvalidateschema.so./Release/validateschema.o Src/libxml2.a Src/libz.a

  --------------------------------------

  In addition to what said Daniel on the specification of an external shared library in the liaison stage of your version of the shared library, together with the - shared option, there is still one thing to consider:

  Your library of hello.so then contains references to functions in external shared libraries libxml.so and zlib.so. When LabVIEW calls dlopen ("/ path/dir/hello.so",...) it basically hands of any control in the linker Linux running, ld.so that takes care of the rest. LD.so then try to load the shared library, recognizing that there are external references and try to solve.

  First he tries to match the missing external references to any symbols that have been previously loaded into the current process already. If this is not successful for a particular system, it queries the ldcache for a library and a symbol. ldcache is updated with the ldconfig program. When you add a new shared library on the system that you want the linker ld.so runtime in order to find, run ldconfig.

  NOTE: Running ldconfig is not normally necessary to shared libraries that access you directly via the node call library, as you specify here the full access to your custom library shared already, so path ld.so will fail immediately if it is not the library specified in the given absolute position and will not attempt to query ldcache at all.

  If you are installing packages through your package manager platform update ldcache for all publicly accessible libraries shared in these packages is usually done automatically for you as part of the package installation script. If however you manually install the libraries you need to run ldconfig yourself. In your case, you could add the libxml.so and/usr/lib zlib.so and simply run ldconfig from the command-line as it default search/lib and/usr/lib for libraries shared and rebuilt the ldcache from that. If you add your new libraries in a different directory on your computer you need to run ldconfig with - n option, saying what directory the new shared libraries have been installed.

• Failure to build LabVIEW application on Linux using "Shared library".

  In order to create a LabVIEW application on linux without X display, I have respected the LabVIEW VI using the shared library for Linux. I did it by clicking with the right button on construction Specifications and selecting New > Shared Library, and in the section Advanced , check the box labeled embedded version using the runtime engine. At the end of the build process, a message to inform that the build failed with the following message:

  "Error 127 to the Exec System: sh: gcc: command not found".

  The error code is not set. No one has provided a description for this code, or you could have wired a number which is not an admission of error code error code. »

  I have had no compling the LabVIEW VI in normal mode, so am confused about which is the problem.

  Hi Julian,.

  GCC is a compiler C and C++ under Linux.  A simple way to check if it is installed is to open a terminal and type 'gcc', if the command is recognized then the package is already installed, and the problem must lie elsewhere.  If this slot of Linux has a package manager, then it must be posted in here also.  If not then it could point to him being not installed or missing a dependency makes not accessible from the command line.  Here is a link that should hopefully scroll you through installation of gcc with Redhat: http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/centos-linux-install-gcc-c-c-compiler/ .