Ghost patch confusion vulnerability

Similar Questions

• Updated codec C40 to the latest version of the TC software - use CUCM?

  I need to upgrade our C40 codecs to patch the vulnerability of Bash.  Currently they all run TC5.1.3.292001.

  I noticed a few options in the download options for the included C40.

  (1) Non-crypto and crypto software.  The way I read it, this refers only to the software itself, not any kind of codec options?

  (2) "to be used with CUCM"-I'm not sure how to check it. "  I inherited these devices with no documentation and the original seller is pretty useless.  Is it possible to check?  We use CUCM, but to my knowledge, our phones can't integrate directly with the TP system (we have customers MOVI for this).

  Stuart,

  I don't think that Cisco has published a version of TC software that has the fix vulnerabilities of bash.

  The non-crypto software has none of the feature SSL on it - IE. signaling/media figures. Usually goes with cryptography is the safer bet unless you're from a country that has to import restrictions.

  CUCM - if your termination points are saved to CUCM, then you must use the version of the file CUCM. It will be uploaded to the server CUCM himself by going to install/upgrade the Administration of Cisco's operating system and restart the TFTP service. In this way, the file will be pushed down from the server when the codec is reset.

  For the non-CUCM, you use the other file and download the .pkg directly on the codecs. It seems to me that you have a VCS based so the .pkg file deployment, this is what you will use.

• Confusion with priority BIOS after running Norton Ghost.

  Years ago, I had done a fresh XP install on a 75 GB Seagate hard drive. I have an old Maxtor drive of 25 GB the first connection on the Ribbon of the IDE and the Seagate is the second link on the same Ribbon. I have updated the BIOS to boot from the Seagate.  Performance lately on the Seagate has not been good, so I decided to start from scratch. I did a fresh install of XP on the Maxtor and everything is saved for this drive. Subsequently, I deleted the partition of Seagate and used Norton Ghost 9.0 to copy the contents of the Maxtor to the Seagate. Then I changed the priority of hard drive BIOS so the computer would be of the Seagate. When the computer is first started after the copy, I got a blue screen which took place from the disk check. Subsequently, it seemed to boot from Maxtor, thanks to the constant ROAR. The Seagate is quiet.
  In addition, when I opened up under administrative tools computer management, the Seagate drive appears as drive D rather than C. I was confused so I saved a file on the desktop to confirm which drive has started. The resulting file saved in D:\Documents and Settings\... folder.  It makes no sense to me.  Why does the computer start to the Maxtor with the Seagate with the priority in the BIOS? In addition, since he did start the Maxtor, I do not understand why the file was saved on drive D instead of C (Maxtor) (Seagate). Remember, I had the same hard drive and BIOS before configuring backup and run the ghosts and files were copied on the disks expected during the priming for the Seagate.
  Does anyone have an idea what is happening?

  The BIOS follows it of own rules to choose which drive start.
  Once he locates the starting tips for, then turns the Windows.

  Windows (XP) also gets its own way to begin - so you must be sure that it's boot sequence is correct.  I got a new SATA Raptor drive which was starting slow as molasses - until I found that the system was booting from the old IDE drive before he transferred control over the fastest SATA drive that Windows has been installed on.

  Finally, other programs have different ways to determine which drive they use.
  Add a copy of a disc (using Ghost) can keep registry settings for different drive specifications.

  IMO, on a XP system, you must have 1 player who put in shape to boot from.  The rest should be just the storage drives.

• IronPort SSH Keys vulnerability patch

  Hello

  customer is running WSA 8.8.0 - 085. In the web pages of upgrades available, we show the file "vulnerability cisco-sa-20150625-ironport Fix SSH Keys." When you try to apply it, web pages and the CLI, such as suggested by RN, it shows the patch as it has already applied:

  Check if "Vulnerability Cisco-Ironport SSH Keys" patch is required
  Patch 'Vulnerability cisco-Ironport SSH Keys' is already applied
  Facility upgrade is complete.

  I think it's BECAUSE WSA has been upgraded after June 25, a release already includes this patch.

  Question:

  -How can I be sure that SSH keys are ok?

  -Why the patch stay in the upgrades available? Can I delete it?

  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  Thanks for reaching out, here is the link that provide details around this:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/blog/12543046/multiple-default-SSH-keys-...

  and what is "why patch stay in available upgrades? Can I remove it? »

  This patch will be deleted once you upgrade to version 9.0.x and now cannot be "off put into service.

  Kind regards

  Zack

• WSA - SSH Vulnerability Patch-

  Hello

  We are trying to install the cisco-sa-20150625-ironport patch on our WSA. When we do the instalation, the WSA restart normally, but the patch, still on display in the available updates.

  Is this normal. Does anyone else have this problem?

  This is a normal operation.

  After completion - you will see this listed in the output of upgrades evident - once it has been applied only once, please ignore for later installation.  If it is turned on again, the output shows that it's already done:

  wsa100v.local > upgrade

  Updates available.
  1 cisco-sa-20150625-ironport SSH Keys vulnerability challenge
  [1] 1 >

  You want to save the current configuration in the configuration directory before the upgrade? [Y] > n

  You want to send the current configuration before upgrading? [N] > n

  Perform an upgrade may require a reboot of the system after the upgrade. You can connect again after that. You want to upgrade? [Y] > y

  Check if "Vulnerability Cisco-Ironport SSH Keys" patch is required
  Patch 'Vulnerability cisco-Ironport SSH Keys' is already applied
  Facility upgrade is complete.

  -Robert

• Confusion about 10.1.0.5 database infrastructure release 1 group of patches?

  We have the database 10.1.0.5 for our infrastructure and I recently downloaded (but has not yet installed) Patch 34 for this database. The 10.1.2.3 documentation group of Application server makes reference fixes to a 10.1.0.5 release 1 group of fixes needed before updating the mid layer - I'm a little confused as to if the patch version 1 is different of the patch 34 I downloaded - can someone put me straight on the opportunity are two different things , and what they mean for an upgrade of the ACE 10.1.2.0.2 to 10.1.2.3?
  
  Thank you
  Adam

  Adam J Sawyer wrote:
  We have the 10.1.0.5 for our infrastructure and I recently downloaded (but has not yet installed) Patch 34 of databases to this database. The 10.1.2.3 documentation group of Application server makes reference fixes to a 10.1.0.5 free 1 group of necessary corrections before you update the mid layer - I'm a little confused as to whether the patch version 1 group is different for the patch 34 I downloaded - can anyone put me directly on whether they are two different things , and what they mean for an upgrade of the ACE 10.1.2.0.2 to 10.1.2.3?

  Thank you
  Adam

  Hi Adam

  AS 10.1.2.0.2 comes with a default infra-DB version 10.1.0.4. You can get DB 10.1.0.5 by updating this DB. To do this, you follow the Group of hotfixes DB whose full name is the following:

  Patch database Oracle® defined Notes
  * 10g Release 1 (10.1.0.5) Patch Set * for Microsoft Windows (32-bit)
  (choose your platform ;)

  This patch Set is same as you see on the AS 10.1.2.3 Patch Set 3 documentation update.
  She says she can apply to the following:

  "You can apply the patch to version 10.1.0.5 Oracle Database 10g on Oracle Database 10g release 1 (10.1.0.2, 10.1.0.3 or 10.1.0.4) following facilities:
  * Oracle database
  * Oracle Real Application Clusters
  * Oracle database Client
  * Oracle database companion CD
  * Oracle Cluster Ready Services
  "

  If the version of your DB infrastructure is already 10.1.0.5, then,.
  -you meet the requirements of AS 10123 Patch Set 3 on your infra-DB.
  -In addition, you can see that the above DB Patch Set Rel 1 is not applicable to your DB.

  I don't know who is this 34 Patch Set that you downloaded. You know his full name or include its patch number?
  I don't think that you need for your upgrade from ACE for the reasons mentioned above.

  I hope that would clarify some of your doubts.
  Kind regards
  AMN

• Now PATCHED - Adobe Reader/Acrobat Font parsing of type integer overflow vulnerability

  The following was copied/pasted from http://secunia.com/advisories/40766/

  Description
  Charlie Miller has discovered a vulnerability [criticism] in Adobe Reader / Acrobat, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a user's system.

  Vulnerability is due to an integer overflow error in CoolType.dll during the analysis of the value of the 'maxCompositePoints' field in table 'maxp' (profile Maximum) of a TrueType font. This can be exploited to memory corrupted via a PDF file containing a specially designed TrueType font.

  Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary code.

  The vulnerability is confirmed in Adobe Reader versions 8.2.3 and 9.3.3 and Adobe Acrobat version 9.3.3. Other versions may also be affected.

  Solution
  Do not open untrusted PDF files.

  Provided and/or discovered by
  Charlie Miller, Independent Security Evaluators.

  Original notice
  Crash Analysis with BitBlaze (pages 51-58):
  http://securityevaluators.com/files/papers/CrashAnalysis.PDF

  
  

• patch for the vulnerability CVE-2016-0953 on photoshop 13.0

  Hello

  Where can I find the patch to correct vulnerabilities - 0953-2016-CVE CVE - 2012 - 027, CVE-2016-0952, CVE-2016-0951 for photoshop 13.0?

  Help > updates watch "your applications are all up to date.

  Help, please

  concerning

  Badiss

  You will not. Photoshop CS6 does never update.  Creative Cloud now includes Creative Suite Master Collection and Design Premium features

  Adobe - Photoshop: For Windows

  2013 was the last update. Camera Raw is stopped to 9.1.1

• Confused about recording for patches. What should I do?

  I just finished the installation of Oracle Database Oracle Linux 6.5 i386 in Virtualbox, I hope to study how to administer these databases may be to get certification and a career as a DBA. In the instructions in post-installation here, databases Oracle post-installation tasks, it is said to get patches to support as part of the 'necessary post-installation tasks. I guess I'll have to pay for something that nothing in life is free, but I'm wondering for a "support identifier" - in order to register. How can I go about obtaining an identifier of 'support' so that I can patch the installation of Oracle DB that I just finished?

  To download patches, you will need to purchase a support contract, you will be given an identifier support. Search these forums for similar issues, published in the past. For the purpose of self-training, you do not have to apply patches to the essential

  HTH
  Srini

• Confusion of new patch

  Hi hussein.
  
  I have 2 two cases of EBS 11i named DEV and DEV2. Install both separately using rapidwiz.
  
  Scenaro 1:
  
  (a) I applied patchA dev.
  (b) I copied data only (proddata) DEV2 and run rapdiclone so that DEV2 instance has the database DEV1. I mean their contents of the database are the same, but the appstiers are not as patchA did not apply to the side of level apps DEV2.
  
  
  My question is can I ask a patchA DEV2 instance just to update the side appstier or forms executables?
  
  
  Thank you very much

  Hello

  My question is can I ask a patchA DEV2 instance just to update the side appstier or forms executables?

  Yes, you can by using the option "nodatabaseportion" (i.e. options adpatch = nodatabaseportion).

  Kind regards
  Hussein

• Installation Guide for the Patch CSCur04820 (Bash vulnerability)

  Dear community,

  is there a documentation for the installation of the hotfix CSCur04820 on first Collaboration insurance 10.5.1? In the sections of software downloads, there is no supplied readme file.

  Your answers are greatly appreciated.

  Best regards

  Igor

   Procedure to upgrade Bash Shell rpm 1) SSH to PCA Server and goto /tmp directory (ssh -p 26 root@) 2) Download the attached bash-3.2-33.el5_11.4.x86_64.rpm file to /tmp directory in Prime Collaboration Assurance(PCA) server. 3) Run "rpm -Uvh bash-3.2-33.el5_11.4.x86_64.rpm" to upgrade the Bash shell 4) Goto /opt/emms/emsam directory (cd /opt/emms/emsam) 5) Run "bin/cpcmcontrol.sh stop" to stop Prime Collaboration Processes. 6) Run "reboot" command to reboot the VM. 7) Once VM is rebooted and all the Processes are UP, you can continue to use the Server.

  You can run this command before and after to make sure it's installed:

   rpm -qa | grep bash

• confusing upgrade patch...

  I currently have a VDI infrastructure that looks like this...

  vCenter 5.5

  Hypervisor 5.5

  Horizon 6.0.1

  Composer 6.0.1

  VSAN 5.5

  Can someone guide me in the right order to upgrade these components. A hard time to find a clean way through vmware I want to go to vcenter 6 and horizon 6.1.1 PDFs.

  I understand is vcenter, hypervisors, composer, servers connection, finally vsan?

  Yes. Its the right way then.

• Oracle RDBMS security patch reports

  Apart from the use of costly commercial vulnerability scanners, are there easy techniques to produce a user-friendly management report on what security patches are missing from a server Oracle 11 g? Or better still to produce a 'fully patched security' type assurance to management report.
  
  Could you provide some simple steps to make the report or management of a sample report?
  In addition, that excuse my ignorance, but I've heard systems administrators say that they often fall security patches from database that they refer, apply the hotfix could cause problems with the operation of the application, it's a legitimate concern or a load of nonsense? Have you ever applied a security patch that had an unfortunate knock on effect on the request which it gives life.
  
  Please keep simple answers to the DBA/management not friendly.

  Hello

  in my experience in customer support, I found that customers often confuse the severity of a vulnerability of security with the effects
  correction, for example a typical vulnerability would involve validating the incorrect settings, so it would be possible to abuse an API
  call to "do their thing", however well behaved applications never try to do more than documented, so for those the fix has zero effect.

  Also in my experience regressions are very rare and even more exceptional in patches of CPU, since they do not plan to change the
  feature but only to stop bad things or possible.

  The best practice is to catch up with the CPU patches (or power supply) as they are made available and do not fall too far behind, each time as Oracle
  emits an alert or quarterly a patch of CPU, there is a risk matrix that lists scores of vulnerability on a scale of 1 to 10
  detailing how he is this time for the CPU quarterly most people forget that it only lists the problems reported since the previous.
  then when they fall with wonder and patching, if the issue is serious enough to apply a patch for it, they forget to check
  the severity of all issues fixed since the last CPU they applied.

  The Advisor must simply apply these patches as soon as they are made available as they are low-risk and fix serious problems.

  To check which hotfixes are installed in household use of database: opatch lsinventory-patch, for example with the last power supply on 11.2.0.3 it looks like this:

  Patch 14727310 : applied on Wed Jan 16 08:11:22 THIS 2013
  Patch ID: 15663328
  Patch description: "Set update database: 11.2.0.3.5 (14727310).
  Created on December 27, 2012 00:06:30 hrs PST8PDT
  Sub -patch 14275605; "Game of the database update fixes: 11.2.0.3.4 (14275605).
  Sub -patch 13923374; "Game of the database update fixes: 11.2.0.3.3 (13923374).
  Sub -patch 13696216; "Game of the database update fixes: 11.2.0.3.2 (13696216).
  Sub -patch 13343438; "Game of the database update fixes: 11.2.0.3.1 (13343438).
  Bugs fixed:
  

  Inside the database, you can query the registry history $ for example (for the same database):

  SQL > set linesize 90
  set pagesize 100
  Select substr(action_time,1,30) action_time,
  substr(ID,1,8) id,
  substr action (action, 1, 10),
  version of substr (version, 1, 8),
  substr(BUNDLE_SERIES,1,6) BUNDLE_SERIES,
  substr (Comments, 1, 20) comments
  history of registry of $; SQL > SQL > 2 3 4 5 6 7

  ACTION_TIME ID ACTION VERSION
  -------------------- ---- -------- --------------------------------
  BUNDLE_SERIES COMMENTS
  ------------------------ ----------------------------------------
  10.21.11.5 17-SEP-11 0 TO APPLY 11.2.0.3
  95816 AM
  Group patches PSU 11.2.0.2.0

  JULY 6, 12 02.11.35.3 0 IS APPLIED 11.2.0.3
  33630:
  Group patches PSU 11.2.0.2.0

  20 NOVEMBER 12 04.55.45.3 4 TO APPLY 11.2.0.3
  98041 PM
  POWER SUPPLY PSU 11.2.0.3.4

  16 JANUARY 13 08.13.40.6 5 IS APPLIED 11.2.0.3
  13726 AM
  POWER SUPPLY PSU 11.2.0.3.5

  For more information, see:

  notes 821263.1 How confirm that an update critical Patch (CPU) has been installed on Linux / UNIX

  Greetings,

  Damage ten Monkshood

  Published by: hnapel on January 16, 2013 03:41

• Is it necessary for 9.2.1 IOS users to install IOS 9.3.5 patch

  Is it necessary that the users of iphone that is running IOS 9.2.1 must install the 9.3.5 patch update which fixes a major security vulnerability or it is for users who have already updated to 9.3.4 IOS?

  Yes, if you correct the defect.

• Is the opinion of 12/02/2015 to install the fix really vulnerability in firefox?

  After the closure of 3 text boxes released firefox indicating is 93%, at risk and needs to be reinstalled with the correction code. The Web site noted was strange and seems not related to Mozilla. I chose not to run his link. There is a vulnerability in need of closure?

  No, it's not Mozilla or the Firefox web bowser. Scammers use the popularity of Firefox and try to mislead the less experienced users of Firefox and or Windows to download an .exe to infect Windows.

  Updates of Firefox on Windows, Mac OSX and Linux are are in the browser Firefox itself or download on https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/all

  Mozilla does not .exe patches or do they host updates on randomly selected sites outside of *. Mozilla.org