Global partitioned index hash
Is it possible to create an index of global partitioned hash on the columns of the primary key of a table that is not partitioned itself?If a table has a PK constraint there an index generated automatically on the PK columns.
Y at - it a syntax to make the overall index partitioned hash when creating the constraint of PK,.
or syntax to MODIFY the indexes after the creation of the constraint?
When you add a Pk to a table, you can choose a place already in the index. Something like
alter table t1 add constraint T_PK primary key (col1) using index T_IDX;
Create the partitioned index as you like with the same columns as the primary key and use the foregoing.
Tags: Database
Similar Questions
-
Global partitioned index shows State N/A sqldeveloper
Hi again,
I tried to create a global index divided by 4 hash partitions to be used as the primary key.
I think I understand the syntax for creating an index of global hash (using 4 partitions) that is used by the primary key constraint.
Here's my response:
ALTER table vehicle_data
Add the constraint of KEY PRIMARY C_PK_ID
(
ID
)
USING INDEX
HASH PARTITION (LWVD_ID)
4. THE PARTITIONS
ENABLE;
What I don't understand is this:
When I take the sqldeveloper, go to the table and select the tab 'index' index status is indicated by n/a. When I create the index without partitioning it shows valid.
What is the problem that I forgot?
Thanks again,
AndreasYou forgot that it is partitioned.
If you look in ALL_IND_PARTITIONS for the State.
-
Table partition and no partition indexes
Hello
I have the partition table that contains about 1 ml recods and he have daily score.
This partition table have only a unique index that is a partition No.
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX xxxxxx WE yyyyyy
(ITEM_GUID, IMAGE_SIDE)
LOGGING
TABLESPACE zzzzzz
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 2
MAXTRANS 255
STORAGE)
INITIAL 170M
ACCORDING TO 1 M
MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0
DEFAULT USER_TABLES
)
NOPARALLEL;
I drop very first partition of
Fall of ALTER TABLE wwww.yyyyy SCORE PT_20080706;
But this isn't my unique INVALID index.
Is it normal to have a VALID unique index after the fall of any partition?
Do I have to rebuild a unique index again?
DB: oracle 10.2.0.3
platform: solaris
Thanks in advanceAccording to the Oracle doc, if you drop the bulkhead with an overall index,.
All index global, or all partitions of global partitioned indexes are marked UNUSABLE unless one of the following are true:
You specify the UPDATE INDEX (cannot be specified for tables organized by index. Use GLOBAL updating INDEXES.)
The dropped partition or its subparts are empty
more info here
http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/B19306_01/server.102/b14231/partiti.htm#sthref2751Check ALL_PART_INDEXES and ALL_INDEXES to check the State of your indexes.
-
with hash index global partition
Hello
I use SQL DEVELOPER DATA MODELER Version 4.0.0.833.
In the database have an index with global hash partitions (11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0)
When I sincronize with the database and the search for differences I find this tablespace in metadata comes from DDBB is null.
Thank you for all.
David
Hi David,
It seems that the storage space for the partitions of a partitioned index global hash is not currently imported from the database.
I connected an enhancement request to support this feature.
David
-
Partitioned index not used in the query
Hello
Oracle 10.2.0.1
Windows xp
I'm confused why oracle did not use a partitioned below index:
But when I said something different; then it accesses the indexes:SQL> set line 200; SQL> SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY EXPLAIN; SQL> select * from MYTABLE where PROD like 'SOAP%'; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 2899783245 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1852 | 115K| 992 (3)| 00:00:12 | | | | 1 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE| | 1852 | 115K| 992 (3)| 00:00:12 | 8 | 8 | |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | MYTABLE | 1852 | 115K| 992 (3)| 00:00:12 | 8 | 8 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 2 - filter("PROD" LIKE 'SOAP%') SQL> desc MYTABLE; Name Null? Type ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- ----------- PROD_ID NOT NULL VARCHAR2(7) PROD NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30) AREA NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30) SUB_AREA NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30) SQL>
How to create prod_idx:SQL> select count(*) from MYTABLE where PROD like 'SOAP%'; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 1393798969 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 16 | 18 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 16 | | | | | | 2 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE| | 1852 | 29632 | 18 (0)| 00:00:01 | 8 | 8 | |* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PROD_IDX | 1852 | 29632 | 18 (0)| 00:00:01 | 8 | 8 | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 3 - access("PROD" LIKE 'SOAP%') filter("PROD" LIKE 'SOAP%') SQL>
SQL> ED Wrote file afiedt.buf 1 create index prod_idx ON mytable(prod) 2 global partition by range(prod) 3 (partition prod1 values less than ('A'), 4 partition prod2 values less than ('B'), 5 partition prod3 values less than ('C'), 6 partition prod4 values less than ('D'), 7 partition prod5 values less than ('E'), 8 partition prod6 values less than ('F'), 9 partition prod7 values less than ('G'), 10 partition prod8 values less than ('H'), 11 partition prod9 values less than ('I'), 12 partition prod10 values less than ('J'), 13 partition prod11 values less than ('K'), 14 partition prod12 values less than ('L'), 15 partition prod13 values less than ('M'), 16 partition prod14 values less than ('N'), 17 partition prod15 values less than ('O'), 18 partition prod16 values less than ('P'), 19 partition prod17 values less than ('Q'), 20 partition prod18 values less than ('R'), 21 partition prod19 values less than ('S'), 22 partition prod20 values less than ('T'), 23 partition prod21 values less than ('U'), 24 partition prod22 values less than ('V'), 25 partition prod23 values less than ('W'), 26 partition prod24 values less than ('X'), 27 partition prod25 values less than ('Y'), 28 partition prod26 values less than ('Z'), 29* partition prod27 values less than (MAXVALUE)) SQL> / Index created.
Table is to have 14693792 lines.SQL> select count(*) from MYTABLE; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 3323402158 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 311 (0)| 00:00:04 | | | | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | | | | | 2 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 14M| 311 (0)| 00:00:04 | 1 | 27 | | 3 | BITMAP CONVERSION COUNT | | 14M| 311 (0)| 00:00:04 | | | | 4 | BITMAP INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| MS_IDX_MYTABLE | | | | 1 | 27 | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why this is the case, please guide me to understand. Thank you.
Published by: user12050217 on July 29, 2010 23:37
Published by: user12050217 on July 29, 2010 23:38
-
Count (*) using partitioned index gives incorrect results
I have a table partitioned by hash with 4 index the.
Table name: store_assortment
clues the: idx1 (master_id), idx2 (store), idx3 (item), idx4 (request_id)
When I run this query result is 13649:
SELECT COUNT (*)
OF store_assortment
WHERE to store = 6010
ORDER BY point;
When I run this query result is 13648:
SELECT COUNT (*)
OF store_assortment
WHERE store = 6010;
I rebuild all indexes, but the results are the same. Can anyone point to a bug or something that can explain this?
I dropped and recreated the indices and values are correct now. Reconstruction did not work.
Thanks for all the help.
-
Hello
What is index hash, to which cases to use hash indexes in oracle. And please give me a simple example.
Thanks in advance,
Sanjeev.>
What is index hash, to which cases to use hash indexes in oracle. And please give me a simple example.
>
You'll never HAVE to use a hash, or any, of the index. You only use an index if it offers some advantages.A hash index is often used when there is a lot of data that you want to break into subsections or separate partitions or when you have a set of distinct values that you want to partition on and will not have to specify all partitions individually.
An example would be if you have data for the 50 States of United States and you want to partition by State. You can create a hash table partitioned on STATE_NAME or STATE_CODE (50 distinct values) and you would get probably 50 scores. It would be easier than creating a partitioned table list and have to specify different 50 "lists" (one for each State).
Oracle would still be partition pruning if your filter predicates used queries such as: WHERE STATE_NAME = "CALIFORNIA". A single partition would be used in the query, even if you use hash partitioning. It is because the word 'CALIFORNIA' always in the same value and Oracle can make this hash when the query is compiled and determine that one partition is required.
-
version: Oracle 10g
Hi alli have a table partitioned by hash(8 segments) with 200 millions records . now we want to move to list partition the same table by state. Is there a way to drop hash Partitions with out losing the data, and Add list partition.
No, you can't 'convert' hash Partitions to list of Partitions.
You must create an empty table that is partitioned from the list and then hover over the data to the new table.
You can use Direct path Insert (i.e. INSERT with APPEND tip) with degree PARALLEL and NOLOGGING on the target table to speed up the copy.
You can also use DBMS_REDEFINITION to migrate the data.
In both cases, you must also create the index on the new table.Hemant K Collette
-
deletion of a partitioned index
Hi friends,
I use 10.2.0.4 oracle on solaris.
I have several partitioned index with the 2011 created on a daily basis. I tried to drop one of the indexes and got the below error.
SQL > ALTER INDEX QOSDEV. PK_RATE_CISCOMEMORYPOOL DROP PARTITION 'OCTOBER 5, 2012 '.
ALTER INDEX QOSDEV. PK_RATE_CISMEPOOL DROP PARTITION 'OCTOBER 5, 2012 '.
Error on line 2
ORA-14076: submitted alter index partition/subpartition operation is not valid for local partitioned indexes
Script done on line 2.
I ask you how to remove these partitions.
Thank you
DBApps
Hello
Try-
ALTER drop partition table RATE_CISCOMEMORYPOOL 'October 5, 2012;
Anand
-
Using Oracle 11.2.0.3
We are evalauating partitiong stragetegies with a view to the realization of gains from perfomnace in reports in particular.
How effeicient are partitioned indexes in this by example anti-terrorism just partitioned index aan table is not partitioned.
One big fact to durrogate keys that have bitmpa indxese table which link to accentuate associated key dimensions.
Patitioning given bitmap index which links to the largest dimension and partitiong Kay dimesnion dimension laregts.
Reflections on partitioned indexes would be particularly useful.
Thank youuser5716448 wrote:
Using Oracle 11.2.0.3We are evalauating partitiong stragetegies with a view to the realization of gains from perfomnace in reports in particular.
How effeicient are partitioned indexes in this by example anti-terrorism just partitioned index aan table is not partitioned.
One big fact to durrogate keys that have bitmpa indxese table which link to accentuate associated key dimensions.
Patitioning given bitmap index which links to the largest dimension and partitiong Kay dimesnion dimension laregts.
Reflections on partitioned indexes would be particularly useful.
Thank you
It is not possible to create a partitioned index bitmp on a non-partitioned table. Bitmap indexes can be local partitioned only.
--
John Watson
Oracle Certified Master s/n
http://skillbuilders.com -
Hi all
I created 2 local partitioned index. The indexes are indexes of function. the table size is 2.3 T.
I created the first clue that it took 14 hours to create, and even to analyze and it works fine now. Then, I created second index. But now it does not.
What should I do?
version 11.1.0.6
RAC, ASM
Thanks in advance
Published by: disaster on April 10, 2011 21:43
Published by: disaster on April 10, 2011 21:51Dear Sir
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | Reads | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 1 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE| | 1 | 1 | 82 |00:03:37.92 | 534K| 534K| |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TBL | 1 | 1 | 82 |00:03:37.92 | 534K| 534K| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is the plan of the real explanation followed by the SQL engine to run your query
The Oracle optimizer is the estimate (based on the statistics that you have collected about index and table) that your query will return only 1 rank (E-lines = 1) while in reality (when the query has been executed) it's return of 82 lines (A-Rows = 82) within 3 minutes and 37 seconds (A-Time = 00:03:37.92)
It is clear that your index function that is not used.
You should be aware that when you create a function based index, oracle will create a virtual column that is hidden behind the scene.
Try to gather statistics on this column using dbms_stats.
Please, try first to TEST
BEGIN DBMS_STATS.gather_table_stats (ownname => user, tabname => 'TBL', CASCADE => TRUE, method_opt => 'FOR ALL HIDDEN COLUMNS SIZE 1' ); END; /
and re - run your query and post once again the new plan explain him like you did before
Best regards
Mohamed Houri
-
ORA-14086: a partitioned index cannot be reconstructed as a whole
Hello
I'm trying to rebuld index had error below.
SQL > alter index rms12. PRICE_HIST_I1 regeneration;
ALTER index rms12. PRICE_HIST_I1 rebuild
*
ERROR on line 1:
ORA-14086: a partitioned index cannot be reconstructed as a whole
Select index_name, separated from dba_indexes where table_name = 'PRICE_HIST '.
o/p
Index_name partitioned
PRICE_HIST_I2 YES
PRICE_HIST_I1 YES
Thank youIf you need to find the names of partition in dba_ind_paritions.
------
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA -
partitioning and partitioned index
I created 1 table with partitions.
CREATE TABLE SAMPLE_ORDERS
(NUMBER OF ORDER_NUMBER,
ORDER_DATE DATE,
NUMBER OF CUST_NUM
NUMBER OF TOTAL_PRICE
NUMBER OF TOTAL_TAX
NUMBER OF TOTAL_SHIPPING)
PARTITION OF RANGE (ORDER_DATE)
(
SO99Q1 PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE (APRIL 1, 1999 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "")),
SO99Q2 PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE (1 JULY 1999 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "")),
SO99Q3 PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE (OCTOBER 1, 1999 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "")),
SO99Q4 PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE (JANUARY 1, 2000 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "")),
SO00Q1 PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE (APRIL 1, 2000 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "")),
SO00Q2 PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE (JULY 1, 2000 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "")),
SO00Q3 PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE (OCTOBER 1, 2000 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "")),
SO00Q4 PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE (JANUARY 1, 2001 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""))
)
;
Few questions is now.
1. How can I create indexes on the table.
2. How can I rebuild the index if it is partitioned index?
3. What is the impact of the reconstruction of indexes on the table (all table locks or just locks partitioned index)
4. If I want to create partition for future purposes, for example for each month do I need to partition manually created for the same thing?
Thank youWhen you create an Index with the keyword LOCAL and do not specify the names of each partition, Oracle uses the default Partition of Table name.
For example, to rebuild the index corresponding to the first partition of the table, partition
alter index sales_orders_ndx_l rebuild partition SO99Q1 ;
DML may continue to run against the other partitions of the table (and their corresponding indices).
When you do the maintenance of the score as the addition of a new Partition or split an existing Partition, for each Partition of the 'new' Table, a corresponding Index Partition will be automatically created.
In order to ensure that the affected Index partitions are not left in a State UNUSABLE but are also rebuilt with maintaining the Table Partition, add the clause INDEX of UPDATE of the ALTER TABLE statement you use. -
Hi gurus,
When truncate us partition, including the overall index, there is a clause 'updated global index", which updates the index.
For the local index, as much as I understoond, oracle automatically maintains according to the partitioned table.
Now for DML have we any method that would have done the same thing?
As far as I understand for DML on the indexed column, index gets each time reconstruction.
Isn't that true for all indexes. Could someone explain to me how this reconstruction happens and how long would it take?
Does it affect your query while the index is in the process of reconstruction?
Thank you
When truncate us partition, including the overall index, there is a clause 'updated global index", which updates the index.
No - the clause is INDEX of UPDATE. You only use 'update global indexes' for a table held in index.
For the local index, as much as I understoond, oracle automatically maintains according to the partitioned table.
Now for DML have we any method that would have done the same thing?
As far as I understand for DML on the indexed column, index gets each time reconstruction.
Non - index do NOT get every time rebuilt. They are 'held' by Oracle. Perform the DML on a line, update the index of this line.
-
Split partition - index / local
Hi friends,
I'm trying to divide a table partition.
Please let me know if the syntax below are correct.
If the local index used
ALTER TABLE SNYT. PART_ESTD
ESTD_M13_S22 PARTITION SPLIT TO ('IS', 13, '22')
IN (ESTD_M13_S21 PARTITION, PARTITION ESTD_M13_S22)
update of the index;
(by http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0:::P11_QUESTION_ID:1401247200346349807)
=================================================================
If used Global indexes
ALTER TABLE SNYT. PART_ESTD
ESTD_M13_S22 PARTITION SPLIT TO ('IS', 13, '22')
IN (ESTD_M13_S21 PARTITION, PARTITION ESTD_M13_S22)
UPDATE GLOBAL INDEXES;
Concerning
KSG
Published by: KSG on 23 August 2012 18:27
Published by: KSG on 23 August 2012 18:51http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e26088/statements_3001.htm#i2131218
http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e26088/statements_3001.htm#i2151566
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to install the second hard drive in the Satellite A200-1 of body weight?
I see my new Satellite A200-1 of body weight has two hard drive bays, the research in the second span, I don't see how a second drive can be mounted as the plug into the Jack seems to be missing. What parts do I have to mount to place a second drive
-
I have a cardscan62 dymo, not the CD, need the serial number to install the software.
-
The tutorial of speech recognition to train my voice is not large enough for the engine get good recognition of my voice. I want to put in place a couple random pages of text (like a novel, etc.), and that I dictate the words in the program he would
-
SMART disk error [301]
Hello and thank you for helping me. I turned on my laptop HP [star wars edition], and it is reading the following on my screen:Disk SMART failureINTELLIGENT drive control has detected an imminent failure. So no loss of data, please backup the content
-
I am the administrator of the account. I can't remove the residue of some programs because of this message. As usual made all the bits to find the answer on the forum of Microsoft and other sites. None of them helped me so far. I also tried the modif