Group feature is not allowed here

Similar Questions

• ORA-00934: Group feature is not allowed here

  CREATE or REPLACE PROCEDURE First(
  date1 IN Date,
  date2 IN Date
  )
          AS
  
  date3 employee.start_date%TYPE;
  date4 employee.start_date%TYPE;
  
  Begin
  select min(start_date) into date3 from employee where start_date between date1 AND date2;
  END;
  /

  Above procedure is completed successfully
  
  But when I changed the query to
  
  Select min (start_date) date3, max (start_date) in date4 of employee where start_date between date1 AND date2.
  then I get the error message
  ORA-00934: Group feature is not allowed here.
  Why this error happens during execution, but on sqlplus query is executed successfully.
  I checked this in oerr ora-00934 but not able to understand what measures should be taken

  select min(start_date)
  ,      max(start_date)
  into   date3
  ,      date4
  from   employee
  where  start_date between date1 AND date2;
  

• PL/SQL: ORA-00934: Group feature is not allowed here

  Hello
  
  I write a PL/SQL procedure. The structure is like:
  
  SET SERVEROUTPUT ON;
  CREATE or REPLACE procedure abc
  
  IS
  v_total_ip_rec number (14);
  v_total_op_rec number (14);
  v_total_rec number (14);
  
  
  BEGIN
  SELECT SUM (CASE
  WHEN < condition 1 >
  THEN 1
  0 OTHERWISE
  END
  ) in v_total_ip_rec.
  SUM (CASE
  WHEN < condition 2 >
  THEN 1
  0 OTHERWISE
  END
  ) in v_total_op_rec.
  SUM (1) in v_total_rec
  OF A, B
  WHERE A.Col1 = B.Col1;
  
  EXCEPTION
  WHILE OTHERS THEN
  raise_application_error (-20001,' an error has occurred - ' |) SQLCODE |' - ERROR - ' | SQLERRM);
  END;
  
  
  When I run this procedure it gives me following error:
  "PL/SQL: ORA-00934: Group feature is not allowed here."
  
  Someone has an idea?
  
  Any help would be appreciated.
  
  Thank you.

  Should I have any special role?

  Have you checked if synonyms exist for tables?
  Please check in this order:

  #1-synonymes appropriate
  #2-appropriate privileges
  #3-appropriate roles

• Group feature is not allowed

  Hi all...
  
  When I run the following text in the SQL command screen, it works fine... But when I try to use it in the APEX to fill the values on the page, it gives me error...
  
  ERROR
  1 error has occurred
  ORA-06550: line 25, column 74: PL/SQL: ORA-00934: Group feature is not allowed here ORA-06550: line 24, column 1: PL/SQL: statement ignored
  
  
  CODE THAT WORKS IN THE FORM OF SQL COMMAND
  
  SELECT
  SUM(CASE WHEN SLOT = 'Q' THEN '1' ELSE '0' END) AS C_SLOT,
  SUM(CASE WHEN TEST = 'P' THEN '1' ELSE '0' END) ACE C_TEST,
  OF TBL_REC;
  
  
  CODE THAT GIVES THE ERROR ON THE APPLICATION EXPRESS PAGE
  
  SELECT
  SUM (CASE WHEN SLOT = 'Q', THEN '1' OTHER '0' END) IN: P2_C_SLOT,.
  SUM (CASE WHEN TEST = 'P', THEN '1' OTHER '0' END) IN: P2_C_TEST,.
  OF TBL_REC;
  
  
  The GBA SLOT and TEST have the letter codes, I want just that it count only when it matches a certain letter. In the form of SQL command, it returns a single line, with the charges, all right. This is only a problem when I try to use anywere on a page in Application Express.
  
  The full version has about 20 lines that are all rows in the sum, but I can't even the worm 2 lines above to work.
  
  Any thoughts?

  VR;

  SELECT
  SUM (CASE WHEN SLOT = 'Q', THEN '1' OTHER '0' END)
  SUM (CASE WHEN TEST = 'P', THEN '1' OTHER '0' END) IN: P2_C_SLOT,: P2_C_TEST
  OF TBL_REC;

  Published by: seal of hash on June 3, 2009 12:56

• Help with error - 934 group function is not allowed here

  Hey there will, I'm having problems with a request and just does not know how to do it without error.

  I'm trying to get all the employee emerging infectious diseases that have less than 2 number max of DID (dependants) in the table.

  It's my current query

  SELECT Employee.LName. ' ' || Employee.Fname as Full_Name, Employee.EID

  The left outer JOIN employee depends on Employee.EID = Dependent.EID

  Having Count (DID)--2 > ((select Max (N) as From (SELECT Employee.EID, Count (DID) As N FROM Employee Inner Join Dependent On Employee.EID = Dependent.EID group by Employee.EID, Count (DID))) N)

  Order of Employee.Lname, Employee.Fname

  Which gives me an error on column 4, no matter what I do. If I remove the Count (DID) in the group by clause (which I tried it earlier), it gives me a is not an error of the function of single group...

  The most frustrating thing is that

  Select Max (N) as From (SELECT Employee.EID, Count (DID) As N FROM Employee Inner Join Dependent On Employee.EID = Dependent.EID group by Employee.EID) N

  Works perfectly, but because it's a mission, I have to do in one step (no substeps/views)

  Any help?

  Thank you very much

  Hello

  ac981e5d-D10A-4520-BF42-23a894d04fb7 wrote:

  Ok. I'm taking your code in a view... I get this.

  and there is an orange underscore and a text of the error that says

  Select incoherent list in group by... change the group by clause of e.fname, e.lname, e.eid, count, max

  Which isn't what either the Oracle database would do.  Everything about orange (or any other color) sounds like it is caused by a front-end that could be interacting with Oracle.  In addition, the Oracle error messages always come with a 3-letter-5 code, as ORA-00933.

  under the selection internal (first medium)

  You have deleted the WITH clause.  The parser can recognize the error when it has reached the first left parenthesis.

  Create view AS A10T2

  (

  SELECT e.lname. ' ' || e.fname AS full_name

  e.eid

  (D.) AS this_group_count

  MAX (COUNT (d.)) ON (AS highest_group_count)

  E employee

  LEFT OUTER JOIN dependent d ON e.eid = d.eid

  GROUP BY e.lname, e.fname, e.eid

  )

  SELECT full_name

  eid

  Of aggregate_results

  WHERE this_group_count > = highest_group_count - 2

  ORDER BY full_name

  You need the WITH to define this clause means "AGGREGATE_RESULTS":

  Create view AS A10T2

  WITH aggregate_results AS

  (

  SELECT e.lname. ' ' || e.fname AS full_name

  ...

  Why do you have an ORDER BY clause in a view?   (It is probably not cause of your errors, just make the inefficient view)

  Command line error: column 5: 23

  Error report-

  SQL error: ORA-00933: SQL not correctly completed command

  00933 00000 - "not correctly completed SQL command.

  * Cause:

  * Action:

  This is another indication that some front is getting involved.  Looks like your front-end reports the exact Oracle error message, "0RA-00933" and then builing it's own error code, "00933. 00000 ", on this basis.  ORA-00933 is a reasonable mistake to wait if you omit the line ' WITH the aggregated results AS.  Once again, until I can actually run your code, I can't test it, and I can't run your code until you post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for some examples of data, or change the problem to use commonly available tables, such as those in the scott schema.

  and when I try my code

  CREATE VIEW A10T2 AS

  SELECT Employee.LName. ' ' || Employee.Fname as Full_Name, Employee.EID

  The left outer JOIN employee depends on Employee.EID = Dependent.EID

  Seen (Count (DID)) + 2 > (select Max (N) From (SELECT Employee.EID, Count (DID) As "N" FROM Employee Inner Join Dependent On Employee.EID = Dependent.EID group by Employee.EID))

  Order of Employee.Lname, Employee.Fname

  I get

  Command line error: column 2: 8

  Error report-

  SQL error: ORA-00937: not a function of simple-group

  00937 00000 - 'not a single-group function.

  * Cause:

  * Action:

  Then the orange underscore even under my inner ("select employee. EID, Count (DID) as "N" ") says to change the Group of Employee.eid, Count (DID)

  I just don't understand why he tells me to group them by Count (DID)?

  Isn't that what you did in your original post, and I have explained in answer #2?  If you continue to repeat the same mistake, you can expect continue to get the same error.  Given that you have a code, you know causes an error, do you think really that what makes a vision will cause the error to disappear?

  The inner query works fine on its own...

  Right; It's the outer query where you are missing the GROUP BY clause.

• ORA-01733-virtual column not allowed here - insert using inline view

  Does anyone know why I get ORA-01733-virtual column not allowed here
  
  SQL > select * from v version $;
  
  BANNER
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
  PL/SQL release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
  CORE 11.1.0.6.0 Production
  AMT for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
  
  
  
  -no error without the WITH CHECK option
  
  SQL > INSERT INTO
  2 (SELECT
  3 location_id,
  4 city
  5 l.country_id
  6 OF country c, localities, regions r l
  7 where l.country_id = c.country_id
  8 and c.region_id = r.region_id
  9 and r.region_name = 'Asia')
  10 VALUES (5500, 'Common Wansdworth', 'UK');
  
  1 line of creation.
  
  SQL > rollback;
  
  Complete restoration.
  
  
  -error with WITH CHECK OPTION
  
  
  SQL > INSERT INTO
  2 (SELECT
  3 location_id,
  4 city
  5 l.country_id
  6 OF country c, localities, regions r l
  7 where l.country_id = c.country_id
  8 and c.region_id = r.region_id
  9 and r.region_name = 'Asia' WITH CHECK OPTION)
  10 VALUES (5500, 'Common Wansdworth', 'UK');
  INSERT INTO
  *
  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-01733: virtual column not allowed here
  
  
  
  
  I was expecting
  
  ORA-01402: discovers the violation of where WITH CHECK OPTION clause
  
  for the second. Am I missing here?

  Coskan wrote:
  Randolf

  Thanks a lot for the update of this old question
  After reading the link, I think I should ignore this error and accept him as ORA-01402

  The information that you have asked me to check me do not have an understanding of the different error types.

  Coskan,

  I didn't know this is an old thread that somehow got updated by someone else.

  Regarding your question: you're right that the output of the script is not really that useful.

  I have just run on 10.2.0.4 and in general, it seems that the output of USER_UPDATABLE_COLUMNS is incorrect regarding the views of join using the WITH CHECK OPTION.

  For example although the location_id from the TEST_V_2 column appears as non-editable (probably because of the rule that "the columns used in the join expression" cannot be modified in a join view when you use the WITH CHECK OPTION) I can run successfully your insert if statement I choose a location_id less than 2000.

  It seems that summed up the difference if you join more than two tables, you'll always get the error "ORA-01733" when you try to insert in the join with the enabled OPTION CHECK view. For example to add a third table TEST_V_2 which does not change the original view, but simply joined meaning for example COUNTRIES to LOCATIONS, will show the same behavior to throw an ORA-01733, however it works fine when the omission of the WITH CHECK OPTION.

  So overall, I tend to say it is really a limitation of the implementation and it is not actually an ORA-01402 but looks like Oracle is simply trying to tell you: Amendment No. INSERT in this possible view. Updates however seem to work, at least I can find some examples of work.

  There seems to be other restrictions of implementation with the WITH CHECK OPTION in place even when the only membership as two tables, for example when trying to join the COUNTRIES and PLACES but by selecting only in PLACES and by using a filter on the COUNTRY_ID predicate fails with ORA-01733 when this predicate is applied to the COUNTRY. COUNTRY_ID but it works if this predicate is applied to PLACES. COUNTRY_ID.

  I could imagine that Oracle has quietly added some of these restrictions with each patch set due to the angle of the case/adverse reactions encountered. I saw this for other features, too.

  Kind regards
  Randolf

  Oracle related blog stuff:
  http://Oracle-Randolf.blogspot.com/

  SQLTools ++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
  http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676 /.
  http://sourceforge.NET/projects/SQLT-pp/

• "User Login not allowed here"

  Here is my layout and the question.

  Page layout

  Using Dell Sonicwall NSA 2600 firewalls

  Two offices connected through the VPN tunnel.

  Office 1 Sonicwall LAN IP: 192.168.1.1

  Office 2 Soincwall LAN IP: 10.1.1.1

  Question:

  Created a local user account with full administrator access for the two sonicwalls. The local administrator account gets the following error message when you try to connect to the web interface to web Office FW of the subnet 2 interface 1 office.

  "User login has not allowed here"

  The default Administrator account is no problem connecting, but the secondary admin account I made to this question. Now, if I use a web browser on subnet 2 to the Office of a local computer secondary admin account has no problem connection on subnet 2 Office.

  Any ideas on that?

  Looks like you need to activate the user on the VPN connection. This is possible by configuring the VPN and going in the Advanced tab.

  Thank you

  Kevin Roberts

• Error when parsing the file ' value of the 'src' attribute is not valid; must be a URI'.  ERROR (RSC-005) to "Hetgeheimfietsen.epub/OEBPS/toc.xhtml" (line 10, col 10): error while parsing the file ' "ol" element not allowed here; wait for the end-tag of t

  The members of the Forum kan help you

  Validation by using version 3.0.1 EPUB rules.

  ()https://github.com/IDPF/epubcheck( )

  December 9, 2015 15:27:33 THIS

  ---------------------------------------------------

  WARNING (OPF-007) to 'Hetgeheimfietsen.epub/OEBPS/content.opf' (line 2, column 227):

  Re-declaration of prefix reserved "rendition."

  ERROR (RSC-005) to "Hetgeheimfietsen.epub/OEBPS/toc.xhtml" (line 10, col 10):

  Error when parsing the file ' "ol" element not allowed here; waiting for the end-tag of the element or element "li" '.

  WARNING (CSS-007) to "Hetgeheimfietsen.epub/OEBPS/css/idGeneratedStyles_0.css" (line 60, col 2):

  Police made OEBPS/font/CambriaMath.ttc refers to fonts not standard type application/x-police-FTT.

  WARNING (PKG-012) to "Hetgeheimfietsen.epub/OEBPS/De_Alpe_d'Huez-1.xhtml":

  File name contains following non ascii characters: '. You want to change the name of the file.

  WARNING (PKG-012) to "Hetgeheimfietsen.epub/OEBPS/De_Alpe_d'Huez-2.xhtml":

  File name contains following non ascii characters: '. You want to change the name of the file.

  Check the finish with warnings or errors!

  In the file Toc delete the second "ol", as well as closing like Epubcheck duplicate codes

  the one after the other (delete the other)

• ORA-00976: virtual specified or operator not allowed here

  Hello

  We had error after upgrade of GR 11, 2, in the insert statement.

  INSERT INTO SDE_TBL_FLEXTRIMSITROUT

  (BRANCHCD,

  SOURCECD,

  CURRENTNO,

  BATCHNO,

  DEPTCD,

  CTL

  INITIATIONDATE,

  AMOUNT,

  ACCOUNT,

  ACCOUNTBRANCH,

  TXNCD,

  DEBITCREDIT,

  LCYEQUIVALENT,

  EXCHRATE,

  VALUEDATE,

  INSTRUMENTNO,

  RELCUST,

  ADDLTEXT,

  TXNMIS1,

  TXNMIS2,

  TXNMIS3,

  TXNMIS4,

  TXNMIS5,

  TXNMIS6,

  TXNMIS7,

  TXNMIS8,

  TXNMIS9,

  TXNMIS10,

  COMPMIS1,

  COMPMIS2,

  COMPMIS3,

  COMPMIS4,

  COMPMIS5,

  COMPMIS6,

  COMPMIS7,

  COMPMIS8,

  COMPMIS9,

  COMPMIS10,

  COSTCODE1,

  COSTCODE2,

  COSTCODE3,

  COSTCODE4,

  COSTCODE5,

  RELATEDACCOUNT,

  RELATEDREF,

  USERREFERENCE,

  ACCTPOSTOVERWRITE,

  EXCHRATEOVERWRITE,

  VALUEDATEOVERWRITE,

  ACCTBALOVERWRITE,

  ITRREFER,

  RefinanceAmount,

  PROCESSID)

  VALUES

  (vBranchCode,

  cCreateNewTrimsITR_rec. APPLSYS,

  ROWNUM,

  nBatchNo,

  cCreateNewTrimsITR_rec. DEPT,

  vCcy,

  To_date (cCreateNewTrimsITR_rec. HOUR, 'YYYYMMDD'),

  nAmount,

  vAccount,

  vAccountBranch, - added by Sibylle

  vTxnCd,

  cDebitCredit,

  nLcyEquivalent,

  nExchRate,

  To_date (cCreateNewTrimsITR_rec. VALUEDATE, 'YYYYMMDD'),

  vInstrumentNo,

  --'      ' || SUBSTR (cCreateNewTrimsITR_rec. ITRREFER, 2, 11),

  vFlxCntry | cCreateNewTrimsITR_rec. APNO,

  vDesc,

  cCreateNewTrimsITR_rec. TRANSOUC,

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  vExpenseMIS,

  vProductMIS,

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 9);

  RPAD (' ', 20);

  cCreateNewTrimsITR_rec. THEIRREF,

  RPAD (' ', 16).

  cActPostOverwrite,

  cExchRateOverWrite,

  cValueDateOverWrite,

  cAcctBalOverWrite,

  cCreateNewTrimsITR_rec. ITRREFER,

  cCreateNewTrimsITR_rec. REFIAMOUNT,

  nFlexOutProcessId);

  Error: ORA-00976: specified virtual or operator not allowed here

  According to the audit, which are a problem in GR 11, 2 with insert query using rownum in values.

  Someone knows how to fix this?

  I wonder why you want to use rownum as a value of insertion? It's not really worth doing an insert without a select statement.

  If you want to use it, it would look like

  Insert into t1 (name, row_num_value)

  Select name

  rownum

  the t2;

  But then you can use an order by clause, on the other it would spoil the rownum order. So an important question is, where is the rownum used for?

• ORA-00976: virtual specified or operator not allowed here - (11g)

  This ora error occurs on one of my test environment.
  
  ORA-00976: virtual specified or operator not allowed here
  
  This happens in one of the plsql pkg, which has no compilation errors. and works perfectly well in other environments.
  
  The only difference I noticed is what error in DB, which is 11g - 11.2.0.3
  and other environments that are in good shape is 10g - 10.2.0.5
  
  Overall of the function where the error is, there is one thing which I suspect (but not sure)
  It is CONNECT BY LEVEL, is used in a query. This could be a problem in 11g?
  If not, any help / troubleshooting tips that will be greatly appreciated. !
  
  -Thank you,

  I can reproduce your error on my 11.2.0.3 instance. Looks like the bug number 13496250 introduced in the 11.2.0.3.

  John

• Database trigger - PL/SQL: ORA-00984: column not allowed here

  I am trying to create a trigger that will update a table of audit used when a row is changed. Using a sequence number to assign an identifier unique to each line as it is created. Need to capture the user ID, date modified and action (update), the image of the front line.
  

  CREATE SEQUENCE emp_audit_seq START WITH 10;                

  Create table emp (
     empno       NUMBER(4)      Primary Key,
     ename       VARCHAR2(10),
     job            VARCHAR2(9),
     mgr           NUMBER(4),
     hiredate     DATE,
     sal             NUMBER(7,2),
     comm        NUMBER(7,2),
     deptno       NUMBER(2));

  CREATE TABLE emp_audit   (
       audit_uid          NUMBER(15)      Primary Key,
       change_date          DATE,
       change_user          VARCHAR2(30),
       action                  CHAR(1),
       empno                  NUMBER(4),
       ename                  VARCHAR2(10),          
       job               VARCHAR2(9),
       mgr               NUMBER(4),
       hiredate          DATE,
       sal               NUMBER(7,2),
       comm                  NUMBER(7,2),
       deptno                  NUMBER(2));

  CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER trig_emp_audit
    BEFORE UPDATE ON emp
    FOR EACH ROW
  BEGIN
    INSERT INTO emp_audit
      VALUES(emp_audit_seq.nextval, change_date, change_user, action, :old.empno, :old.ename, :old.job, :old.mgr, :old.hiredate, :old.sal, :old.comm, deptno);
  END;
  /
  
  Warning: Trigger created with compilation errors.
  
  SQL> show errors
  Errors for TRIGGER TRIG_EMP_AUDIT:
  
  LINE/COL ERROR
  -------- -----------------------------------------------
  2/3      PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
  3/149    PL/SQL: ORA-00984: column not allowed here

  Can someone help to help me find what I'm doing wrong with the trigger?
  
  Published by: LostNoob on August 25, 2012 14:24

  First of all, when you write an INSERT statement, it is always good for the columns that you insert in the list. Which makes the code easier to follow - you do not have separately pull toward the top of the table definition to know what order of columns is inserted. And it makes the code easier to manage because the declaration become invalid if you add a new column to the table in the future.

  Second, CHANGE_DATE, CHANGE_USER and ACTION are not (probably) functions and are not local variables so it is not supposed to use them in an INSERT statement. You need to write code or to take advantage of the existing functions to fill in these columns. I suppose, for example, that you want to use SYSDATE to fill the CHANGE_DATE and the USER to fill the column CHANGE_USER. My guess is that ACTION must always be a 'U' for UPDATE.

  Thirdly, it seems that you left the: old man on the DEPTNO column.

  Put them all together, you would have something like

  CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER trig_emp_audit
    BEFORE UPDATE ON emp
    FOR EACH ROW
  BEGIN
    INSERT INTO emp_audit(
        audit_uid,
        change_date,
        change_user,
        action,
        enpno,
        ename,
        job,
        mgr,
        hiredate,
        sal,
        comm,
        deptno )
      VALUES(
        emp_audit_seq.nextval,
        sysdate,
        user,
        'U',
       :old.empno,
       :old.ename,
       :old.job,
       :old.mgr,
       :old.hiredate,
       :old.sal,
       :old.comm,
       :old.deptno);
  END;
  / 
  

  Justin

• PL/SQL: ORA-00984: column not allowed here

  Sorry, it's probably easy and I forgot something simple, but it's driving me crazy :-)
  

  VARIABLE g_fk_deduction      VARCHAR2(30)
  VARIABLE g_fk_empno          NUMBER
  VARIABLE g_before_or_after_flag     CHAR(1)
  VARIABLE g_deduction_amount     NUMBER
  
  BEGIN
    :g_fk_deduction           := '401K';
    :g_fk_empno               := 7369;
    :g_before_or_after_flag     := 'B';
    :g_deduction_amount          := 150.00;
  END;
  /
  BEGIN
    INSERT INTO emp_deductions      (fk_deduction, fk_empno, before_or_after_flag, deduction_amount)
     VALUES               (g_fk_deduction, g_fk_empno, g_before_or_after_flag, g_deduction_amount);
    COMMIT;
  END;
  /

  Error: PL/SQL: ORA-00984: column not allowed here on g_deduction_amount
  in the value clause.
  Any help would be appreciated.
  
  Table is below:

  CREATE TABLE emp_deductions     (
        fk_deduction            VARCHAR2(30),
        fk_empno                  NUMBER(4),
        before_or_after_flag         CHAR(1),
        deduction_amount            NUMBER(6,2));

  Published by: LostNoob on August 23, 2012 19:06

  rp0428 wrote:
  >
  : g_fk_deduction: = "401k".
  : g_fk_empno: = 7369;
  : g_before_or_after_flag: = 'B ';.
  : g_deduction_amount: = 150.00;
  >
  Why did you put a colon here? Get rid of them.

  They are necessary, since they are declared SQL * more variable.

  The problem for the OP, is that in the clause values in the insert the colon are missing.

  Published by: Mark Williams on August 23, 2012 22:31

  Here is your example requested:

  SQL> create table test (c number);
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> variable v_c number
  SQL> begin
    2    :v_c := 46;
    3  end;
    4  /
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> begin
    2    insert into test values (:v_c);
    3  end;
    4  /
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> commit;
  
  Commit complete.
  
  SQL> select * from test;
  
           C
  ----------
          46
  
  1 row selected.
  
  SQL>
  

• ORA-00984: column not allowed here

  Hi all
  
  Kindly someone please shed some light on this called error "ORA-00984: column not allowed here?
  
  I created a table:
  
  CREATE TABLE JB (ENAME VARCHAR (20));
  
  Table created.
  
  Now, if I INSERT:
  
  INSERT INTO VALUES JB (sintes);
  
  ORA-00984: column not allowed here
  
  Why this error, if I insert a number instead of "Sinti", implementation is also possible. No character is not allowed.
  
  What is the column name in this area, its totally strange to me.
  
  Please someone help me.
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  SINTES

  Hello
  Use quotes around Zack:

  INSERT INTO JB VALUES ('Sathik');
  

• ORA-02287: sequence number not allowed here

  < police = "Courier New" >
  Hello
  Why do I have this problem?
  Insert an order tab2 select tab2_seq.nextval, eng_cat from (select distinct job_det eng_cat) by 2.
  
  SQL > r
  1 * insert into tab2_seq.nextval select eng_cat select (separate eng_cat tab2
  Insert in tab2 select tab2_seq.nextval, eng_cat from (select distinct eng_cat from)
  *
  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-02287: sequence number not allowed here
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  Human
  < / make >

  It's 'order of 2' which makes it fail. That makes no sense at all?
  Just remove the order by clause, then it works ;-)

• ORA-01733: virtual column not allowed here

  UPDATE (
  SELECT callingnumber, calledcallzone, b.callzone callzone, b.ndc
            FROM (SELECT DISTINCT SUBSTR (connectedcallingnumber, 3, 3) callingnumber,
                           calledcallzone,rownum 
                      FROM rating_temp
                     WHERE calltype = 0) a,
                 (SELECT *
                    FROM callzone cc
                   WHERE LENGTH (ndc) = 3) b
           WHERE callingnumber = ndc
           )
     SET calledcallzone = callzone-----VIRTUAL COLUMN NOT ALLOWED HERE

  Published by: user8731258 on November 29, 2010 12:45 AM

  Its simple you used SEPARATE in your first view inline. And so you cannot use columns for UPDATE.