Grouping records

Similar Questions

• SQL to group records and apply logic to pick up a record of each group

  Hi friends,
  
  I am looking for a query group records on some columns in a table and then each group I want to take just a single folder according to certain rules.
  
  Could have given arranged at will to make my point more clear for you. Here you go:

  CREATE TABLE AD_LIST
  (
    FILE_NAME             VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
    ACTIVITY_START        DATE,
    ACTIVITY_END          DATE,
    DIVISION              VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
    ITEM_CODE             VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
    MULT                  NUMBER,
    RETAIL                NUMBER,
    AD_PAGE               VARCHAR2(1 BYTE),
    FORECAST              NUMBER,
    MEMO                  VARCHAR2(50 BYTE)
    );
  
  INSERT INTO AD_LIST VALUES ('FILE_1','01-APR-2010','15-APR-2010','B',1111,5,10,'A',10,'This must be in my result');
  INSERT INTO AD_LIST VALUES ('FILE_1','01-APR-2010','15-APR-2010','B',1111,1,1,'B',15,'Must not be in my result');
  INSERT INTO AD_LIST VALUES ('FILE_1','01-APR-2010','15-APR-2010','B',1111,6,15,'C',11,'Must not be in my result');
  
  INSERT INTO AD_LIST VALUES ('FILE_1','16-APR-2010','30-APR-2010','N',1111,4,20,'D',40,'Must not be in my result');
  INSERT INTO AD_LIST VALUES ('FILE_1','16-APR-2010','30-APR-2010','N',1111,5,15,'E',30,'Must not be in my result');
  INSERT INTO AD_LIST VALUES ('FILE_1','16-APR-2010','30-APR-2010','N',1111,1,2,'F',20,'This must be in my result');
  
  CREATE TABLE PAGE_RANK
  (
    AD_PAGE VARCHAR2(1 BYTE),
    RANK NUMBER
  );
  
  INSERT INTO PAGE_RANK VALUES ('A',1);
  INSERT INTO PAGE_RANK VALUES ('B',2);
  INSERT INTO PAGE_RANK VALUES ('C',3);
  INSERT INTO PAGE_RANK VALUES ('D',4);
  INSERT INTO PAGE_RANK VALUES ('E',5);
  INSERT INTO PAGE_RANK VALUES ('F',6);
  COMMIT;
  
  SELECT * FROM AD_LIST
  
  FILE     ACTIVITY     ACTIVITY          ITEM               AD
  NAME     START          END          DIV     CODE     MULT     RETAIL     PAGE     FORECAST     MEMO
  -----     --------     ---------     ---     ----     ----     -----     ----     ------     -----------------------     
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     5     10     A     10     This must be in my result
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     1     1     B     15     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     6     15     C     11     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     4     20     D     40     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     5     15     E     30     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     1     2     F     20     This must be in my result

  Now, the AD_LIST table I want to group records based on FILE_NAME, ACTIVITY_START, ACTIVITY_END, DIVISION, ITEM_CODE.
  So, in my example here, we have 2 grouped recordset based on the specified columns.
  
  Also, we have a table, PAGE_RANK, who has a rank corresponding to each issue of ad_page. 1. This is a rank higher than 2. This is why page ad 'A' takes precedence over 'B '. The same for all the other pages of ads.
  
  Now, we need to choose an announcement of each ad group in determining page ad rank higher within the Group and the value of mult and retail should be replaced by the value that has min(retail/mult). So, using the above data we will have with the full-page ad = 'A' and ad = page had ' as final results since they have the highest grade of advertising page in their group.
  The value of values mult and details of ad_page 'A' = min (10/5, 1/1, 15/6) = 1,1(mult,retail).
  The value of values mult and detail of ad_page would be ' = min (20/4, 15/5, 2/1) = 1,2(mult,retail).
  
  Finally I have this query below

  SELECT a.file_name,
         a.activity_start,
         a.activity_end,
         a.division,
         a.item_code,
         FIRST_VALUE (a.mult) OVER (PARTITION BY a.file_name, a.activity_start, a.activity_end, a.division, a.item_code ORDER BY (a.retail /
                                                                                                                                  a.mult))
                                                                                                      mult,
         FIRST_VALUE (a.retail) OVER (PARTITION BY a.file_name, a.activity_start, a.activity_end, a.division, a.item_code ORDER BY (a.retail /
                                                                                                                                    a.mult))
                                                                                                    retail,
         FIRST_VALUE (a.ad_page) OVER (PARTITION BY a.file_name, a.activity_start, a.activity_end, a.division, a.item_code ORDER BY (b.RANK))
                                                                                                   ad_page,
         a.forecast,
         a.memo                                                                                                 
    FROM ad_list a, page_rank b
   WHERE a.ad_page = b.ad_page

  This query is giving me all the records, but with the values of what I wanted in the columns Ad_Page, Mult, and retail.
  How can I take only one of each group.
  
  I get this

  FILE     ACTIVITY     ACTIVITY          ITEM               AD
  NAME     START          END          DIV     CODE     MULT     RETAIL     PAGE     FORECAST     MEMO
  -----     --------     ---------     ---     ----     ----     -----     ----     ------     -----------------------     
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     1     1     A     15     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     1     1     A     10     This must be in my result
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     1     1     A     11     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     1     2     D     20     This must be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     1     2     D     30     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     1     2     D     40     Must not be in my result

  But I want this

  FILE     ACTIVITY     ACTIVITY          ITEM               AD
  NAME     START          END          DIV     CODE     MULT     RETAIL     PAGE     FORECAST     MEMO
  -----     --------     ---------     ---     ----     ----     -----     ----     ------     -----------------------     
  
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     1     1     A     10     This must be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     1     2     D     20     This must be in my result

  I have to run this query for thousands of such combination of group.
  Hope someone can shed some light on this query.
  
  Thanks in advance,
  Raj.

  Hello

  This is called a Query Top - N .

  How do you determine which line of each group you want to display?
  If this is the line with forecasts as low, then:

  WITH   got_r_num     AS
  (
  SELECT a.file_name,
         a.activity_start,
         a.activity_end,
         a.division,
         a.item_code,
         FIRST_VALUE (a.mult) OVER (PARTITION BY a.file_name, a.activity_start, a.activity_end, a.division, a.item_code ORDER BY (a.retail /
                                                                                                                                  a.mult))
                                                                                                      mult,
         FIRST_VALUE (a.retail) OVER (PARTITION BY a.file_name, a.activity_start, a.activity_end, a.division, a.item_code ORDER BY (a.retail /
                                                                                                                                    a.mult))
                                                                                                    retail,
         FIRST_VALUE (a.ad_page) OVER (PARTITION BY a.file_name, a.activity_start, a.activity_end, a.division, a.item_code ORDER BY (b.RNK))
                                                                                                   ad_page,
         a.forecast,
         a.memo,
         ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY  a.file_name
                                 ,                  a.activity_start
                     ,            a.activity_end
                     ,            a.division
                     ,            a.item_code
                     ORDER BY       a.forecast
                   )      AS r_num
    FROM ad_list a, page_rank b
   WHERE a.ad_page = b.ad_page
  )
  SELECT file_name,
         activity_start,
         activity_end,
         division,
         item_code,
         forecast,
         mult,
         retail,
         ad_page,
         memo
  FROM   got_r_num
  WHERE  r_num     = 1
  ;
  

  If it is something else, then change the ORDER BY clause in the ROW_NUMBER function.

• BlackBerry smartphone how to change view Contact to see category / group records only

  Hi everyone, just got my first BlackBerry.

  The Bold (9000) is the best screen.

  To be honest, I was anti-BlackBerry when they first came out.

  Did not like the feel of plastic.

  Now that the "BOLD" is here, and for some time, finally I turned.

  After using it for only a week, I must say, I am very impressed and now intend to continue to use it.

  I will also continue to have a second very basic phone.

  I thought that most of the things, even added many additional services, most of them style of Google.

  SE BIS, soon change BES to access our new SBS Exchange work.

  Even some of the most difficult functions, services and settings can be solved for me.

  I do not work in a dealership take Optus, mainly focused on business.

  On the issue...

  Is it possible to get your hands (first / default) connect with view to display the 'files' only category.

  I really wish I could open my contacts, select my category, then search.

  For me, it would be so much easier.

  For example. CONTACTS-Office-Steve

  or CONTACTS-family-MOM

  or CONTACTS-friends-David

  or CONTACTS-Optus-Wireless Technical Support

  This would save search me, especially since some contacts may have a different name, then I expect first (for example, 'hundreds' of Optus numbers, can be 'Pre-activation ULL' or 'Fixed installation support line')

  I guess he will have to show contacts that have not been assigned to a group (category).

  If these contacts have been enumerated below the category records, it would be ideal (for me).

  Perhaps, even if there was a possibility to classify them with the records of the category FIRST then all contacts in alpha?

  I know that a contact can be assigned to several categories (very useful).

  If this isn't an option, are there any recommended additional applications that can do this?

  I hope as clean and efficient as BlackBerry original aps.

  A few years ago, I used a Windows based mobile/PDA.

  To get more out of it, I also installed several aps SPB.

  Ultimately if an additional access point is required and is not free (IE must buy), it would really need a trial period.

  Thanks to anyone for ANY Advisor.

  I'm happy to be part of a more professional group.

  Ian

  This option as a view is not available on the BlackBerry, and I'm not aware of any third-party application to do, there could be.

  One option would be to name all your groups in such a way that they would appear first in your Contact list.

  As instead of naming a group of 'Friends', you would be the name "." See list Friends"with a period at the beginning, which will force this group name to the top of the Contact.

• FILL MONTHS DYNAMICALLY IN THE ITEM VIA ORACLE FORMS GROUP RECORDING LIST

  Experts

  I have a query in oracle forms. I need to fill Last_Month, Current_Month & Next_month based on Sys_Date in the list box. I am able to get the values in SQL if I run the query below, but when I use the version of Oracle Forms 10.1.2.0.2, I could not get the values of Mr. can you please guide me where I'm wrong.

  declare

  v_rg_id recordgroup: = NULL;

  Number of V_errorcode;

  v_rg_salmth varchar2 (30): = "MONTHS";

  Begin

  v_rg_id: = find_group (v_rg_salmth);

  If id_null (v_rg_id) then

  v_rg_id: = create_group_from_query (v_rg_salmth,

  "WITH (AS MONTH_COUNTER)

  SELECT LEVEL 2 AS ID

  OF THE DOUBLE

  CONNECT BY LEVEL = 2

  UNION

  SELECT LEVEL AS ID

  OF THE DOUBLE

  CONNECT BY LEVEL = 0

  )

  SELECT TO_CHAR (ADD_MONTHS (TO_CHAR (SYSDATE), ID), MONTH) AS MONTH_COUNTER MONTHS ');

  v_errorcode: = populate_group (v_rg_id);

  If v_errorcode = 0 then

  message ("record group filled with data");

  on the other

  message ("V_errorcode is:" | ") v_errorcode);

  end if;

  End if;

  populate_list('MASTER.) MONTH, v_rg_id);

  end;

  The rather complicated query, try

  SELECT ADD_MONTHS (SYSDATE-1) TO DOUBLE

  UNION ALL

  SELECT SYSDATE DOUBLE

  UNION ALL

  SELECT THE DOUBLE ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,1)

  BTW. to use a query to populate a list, you must select two values, a label and a value, check it fill listitems dynamically - Andreas Weiden - on Oracle

• Group records as well as frequent mailers

  Hi people,

  I'm looking at a scenario where I would like to group the dates together (for the most part, we assume they are similar and close enough dates and so probably on the same date) when they are close together. The idea is to eliminate the possible duplicates.

  Create table scripts and INSERT into the table:

  create table orders_tb (order_id varchar2(4), order_date date);
  
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1001',to_date('31-DEC-13','DD-MON-RR'));
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1001',to_date('02-JAN-14','DD-MON-RR'));
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1001',to_date('06-JAN-14','DD-MON-RR'));
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1001',to_date('12-JAN-14','DD-MON-RR'));
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1002',to_date('02-FEB-14','DD-MON-RR'));
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1002',to_date('02-MAR-14','DD-MON-RR'));
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1002',to_date('02-MAR-14','DD-MON-RR'));
  

  If I ran the following SELECT statement, I would get 6 entries:

  select distinct order_id, order_date from orders_tb order by order_id, order_date;
  

  However, for the most part, I would like to Order ID 1001 subject only two records. The rule for including dates, that is all the dates to be within 10 days of the date of MIN.

  1001 31-DEC-2013
  1001 12-JAN-2014
  

  Regarding the command ID 1002, he will tell you that the dates are very far.

  1002 02-FEB-2014
  1002 02-MAR-2014
  

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you!

  Hello

  You want to always 2 rows for each order_id exit or you want sometimes 1 or 3 or more?

  You can test it with a little more data sample that test situations like these.  For example, in addition to the sample data that you posted:

  insert into orders_tb (order_id, order_date) values ('1001 ', to_date('13-JAN-2014','DD-MON-YYYY'));

  insert into orders_tb (order_id, order_date) values ('1001 ', to_date('19-JAN-2014','DD-MON-YYYY'));

  insert into orders_tb (order_id, order_date) values ('1001 ', to_date('25-JAN-2014','DD-MON-YYYY'));

  insert into orders_tb (order_id, order_date) values ('1003 ', to_date('01-JAN-2014','DD-MON-YYYY'));

  insert into orders_tb (order_id, order_date) values ('1003 ', to_date('10-JAN-2014','DD-MON-YYYY'));

  Here's one way:

  WITH got_next_date AS

  (

  SELECT DISTINCT

  order_id, order_date

  MIN (order_date) over (PARTITION BY order_id) AS start_date

  MIN (order_date) over (PARTITION BY order_id

  ORDER BY order_date

  RANGE BETWEEN 10.000001 MORE

  AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING

  ), Next_date

  Of orders_tb

  )

  SELECT order_id, order_date

  OF got_next_date

  START WITH order_date = start_date

  CONNECT BY order_date = next_date PRIOR

  AND order_id = order_id PRIOR

  ;

  Output (including the sample data, I added):

  ORDER_ID, ORDER_DATE

  -------- -----------

  1001 December 31, 2013

  1001 12 January 2014

  1001 January 25, 2014

  1002 February 2, 2014

  1002 2 March 2014

  1003 1 January 2014

• Group records between trade unions

  Gurus,
  
  It's been a while since I formatted in SQL, but I have developed the following query, which gives me the result below:
  

       select distinct created_by, count(created_by) receipt_count,  null deliver_count
       from  wms_transaction
       where creation_date > sysdate-10
       and   transaction_type = 'RECEIPT'
       group by  created_by
     union
       select distinct created_by,  null rec_count,  count(created_by) deliver_count
       from  wms_transaction
       where creation_date > sysdate-10
       and   transaction_type = 'DELIVER'
       group by created_by   
       order by receipt_count
  
  CREATED_BY    RECEIPT_COUNT     DELIVER_COUNT
  --------------------   -----------------------     ------------------------
  SPRECKO                    4
  HKUMAR                     4
  SPRECKO                                            10
  HKUMAR                                           856

  The desired output is a user consolidated without additional records...

  CREATED_BY    RECEIPT_COUNT     DELIVER_COUNT
  --------------------   -----------------------     ------------------------
  SPRECKO                    4                       10
  HKUMAR                     4                     856

  Someone there all of the recommendations? I give the points to obtain useful and accurate responses (someone always comments on the points system when I write that ;-))
  
  Thank you
  Scott
  
  Published by: sreese on April 25, 2013 14:23
  
  Published by: sreese on April 25, 2013 14:23

  Hello

  You can do it with a pivot:

  select    created_by
  ,        count ( CASE
                    WHEN  transaction_type = 'RECEIPT'
                  THEN  created_by
              END
            )     as receipt_count
  ,        count ( CASE
                    WHEN  transaction_type = 'DELIVER'
                  THEN  created_by
              END
            )     as deliver_count
  from      wms_transaction
  where        creation_date    > sysdate - 10
  and          transaction_type IN ('DELIVER', 'RECEIPT')
  group by  created_by
  ;
  

  It will be much more effective than a UNION.

  The query above works in Oracle 8.1 or more. From Oracle 11, you can also use SELECT... PIVOT.

  I hope that answers your question.
  If not, post a small example data (CREATE TABLE and only relevant columns, INSERT statements) and also publish outcomes from these data.
  Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.
  Always say what version of Oracle you are using (for example, 11.2.0.2.0).
  See the FAQ forum {message identifier: = 9360002}

  Published by: Frank Kulash on 25 April 2013 14:37

• Group records with time

  Hi all
  
  This is our requirement.
  
  We must combine records with time.
  
  for example: period = 3
  TABLE: XX_SALES
  ---------------------------------------------
  XDATE XQTY
  ---------------------------------------------
  10 5/1/2012
  20 2/5/2012
  3/5/2012 30
  4/5/2012 60
  12 2012/5/7
  8/5/2012 23
  45 8/5/2012
  100 12/5 / 2012
  5/2012/13 55
  5/2012/15 99
  
  == >
  ---------------------------------------------
  XDATE XQTY
  ---------------------------------------------
  1/5/2012 10-> 5/1/2012 Group (5/1/2012 ~ 3/5/2012)
  2/5/2012 20-> 5/1/2012 Group (5/1/2012 ~ 3/5/2012)
  3/5/2012 30-> 5/1/2012 Group (5/1/2012 ~ 3/5/2012)
  4/5/2012 60-> Group 5/2012/4 (4/5/2012 ~ 2012/5/6) *.
  7/5/2012 12-> Group 5/2012/7 (5/7/2012 ~ 9/5/2012) *.
  8/5/2012 23-> Group 5/2012/7 (5/7/2012 ~ 9/5/2012) *.
  8/5/2012 45-> Group 5/2012/7 (5/7/2012 ~ 9/5/2012) *.
  5/2012/12 100-> Group 5/12/2012 (2012/5/12 ~ 14/5/2012) *.
  13/5/2012 55-> Group 5/12/2012 (2012/5/12 ~ 14/5/2012) *.
  5/15/2012 99-> Group 5/15/2012 (15/5/2012 ~ 5/17/2012) *.
  
  After amount to combine with period = 3, the result will be
  ---------------------------------------------
  XDATE_G XQTY_G
  ---------------------------------------------
  60 1/5/2012
  4/5/2012 60
  2012/5/7 80
  12/5/2012 155
  5/2012/15 99
  
  
  Here's the example script

   
  create table XX_SALES(XDATE DATE, XQTY Number);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120501','YYYYMMDD'),10);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120502','YYYYMMDD'),20);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120503','YYYYMMDD'),30);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120504','YYYYMMDD'),60);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120507','YYYYMMDD'),12);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120508','YYYYMMDD'),23);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120508','YYYYMMDD'),45);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120512','YYYYMMDD'),100);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120513','YYYYMMDD'),55);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120515','YYYYMMDD'),99);
   

  We can solve this problem by using the loop now:
  to find the XDATE_G and it's rank in the loop and the XQTY in the range of the sum.
  

  DECLARE
    V_DATE_FROM DATE := NULL;
    V_DATE_TO   DATE := NULL;
    V_QTY_SUM   NUMBER := 0;
    CURSOR CUR_DATE IS
      SELECT DISTINCT XDATE FROM XX_SALES ORDER BY XDATE;
  BEGIN
    FOR REC IN CUR_DATE LOOP
      IF V_DATE_TO IS NULL OR REC.XDATE > V_DATE_TO THEN
        V_DATE_FROM := REC.XDATE;
        V_DATE_TO   := REC.XDATE + 3 - 1;
        SELECT SUM(XQTY)
          INTO V_QTY_SUM
          FROM XX_SALES
         WHERE XDATE >= V_DATE_FROM
           AND XDATE <= V_DATE_TO;
        DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(TO_CHAR(V_DATE_FROM, 'YYYYMMDD') ||
                             '-----qty: ' || TO_CHAR(V_QTY_SUM));
      END IF;
    END LOOP;
  END;

  Is it possible to solve this problem by using analyze sql?
  
  
  Thanks in advance,
  Best regards
  Zhxiang
  
  Published by: zhxiangxie on April 26, 2012 14:41 fixed the grouping expected data

  There was an article about a similar problem in Oracle Magazine recently:

  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/issue-archive/2012/12-Mar/o22asktom-1518271.html

  See the section on the 'grouping beaches '. They needed a total cumulative who started once the total reaches a certain amount.

  You need a total cumulative which starts again when the date changes to group and the dates of beginning and end of each group must be determined dynamically.

  This can be done with the analytical functions.

  Here is a solution-based 'code listing 5', the solution MODEL, which is recommended in the article.

  SELECT FIRST_DATE, SUM(XQTY) SUM_XQTY FROM (
    SELECT * FROM xx_sales
    MODEL DIMENSION BY(ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY XDATE) RN)
    MEASURES(XDATE, XDATE FIRST_DATE, XQTY)
    RULES(
      FIRST_DATE[RN > 1] =
        CASE WHEN XDATE[CV()] - FIRST_DATE[CV() - 1] >= 3
        THEN xdate[cv()]
        ELSE FIRST_DATE[CV() - 1]
        END
    )
  )
  GROUP BY first_date ORDER BY first_date;
  
  FIRST_DATE            SUM_XQTY
  --------------------- --------
  2012/05/01 00:00:00         60
  2012/05/04 00:00:00         60
  2012/05/07 00:00:00         80
  2012/05/12 00:00:00        155
  2012/05/15 00:00:00         99
  

  If you 9i, there is no function model. In this case, I can give you a solution using START WITH / CONNECT BY that does not work as well.

• Output and group records into several column format problem

  Hi all

  I'm banging my head on the wall with this one. I have a query that displays the result in the form of two columns, it works fine.

  I have a problem when I try to use "group"for the field DSC1 doesn't show duplicates."  He transforms the output in column 2, column 3 and column 4 spots white all along.

  Someone knows how can I get it to display 2 columns of output and does not show in double DSC1 fields? The following are examples of what is happening:

  
  

  1 example of what he does without group (note to Apple is twice, which is not):

  Apples apples

  Orange peaches

  banannas grapes

  What I need to do (only show each DSC1 once and continue with the format of two columns) :

  oranges apples

  Fisheries banannas

  grapes

  Here is the code I use:

  < cfquery name = "getProduct" datasource = "mydb" >
  SELECT * from ecitm
  WHERE DSC1 <>' '
  order by DSC1

  < / cfquery >

  <! - start the 2-column output table - >

  < table border = "0" width = "90%" border = "0" align = "center" cellpadding = "5" cellspacing = "5" >
  
  < cfset newrow = false

  < b >
  < cfoutput query = "getProduct" group = "DSC1" >
  
  < cfif newrow EQ "true" >
  < b >
  < / cfif >
  < td >
  #DSC1 #.
  < cfif DSC2 NEQ "" > "".
  < br >
  #DSC2 #.
  < / cfif >

  < br >
  < a href = "DetailsList.cfm? ID = #getProduct.ID # & litm = #getProduct.LITM #" > VIEW < /a > DETAILS
  < table >
  
  < cfif getProduct.currentRow MOD 2 EQ 0 >
  < /tr >
  < cfset newrow = true >
  < cfelse >
  < cfset newrow = false >
  < / cfif >

  
  < / cfoutput >
  < /tr >
  < /table >

  The currentRow always property will count the number or records in the record setting loop, if you their output or not.

  Since you are not the output values for each record in the Recordset, you must count the itterations yourself.

  Put a meter of itteration before the loop.

  Update the counter at the top of the loop.

  OR on newer versions of CF

  Reset the counter in the true clause of the block, where you also define new line. >

  Then use the variable in the iit instead the currentRow property to determine the number of items have been posted.

  **** OR ****

  You could do a simple SQL command does not get duplicates first and then use a loop of simple without any of the grouping and additional logic that you do.

  
  
  SELECT DISTINCT *
       FROM ecitm
       WHERE DSC1 <> ' '
       ORDER BY DSC1
  
  
  
  
       #DSC1#
       
  
      
  
  
  

• using 'like' in the group record query

  Hello
  
  (Forms 6i)
  I dynamically create a record group.
  
  Then to when a new trigger for a list item.
  I want to list all the names of a table like 'a % ';
  
  query: select name, id (id) to_char of test_name where name like 'a % ';
  
  but I'm not able to give a quote unique in the query.
  Is it possible to do?
  
  Published by: Tuts009 on May 9, 2010 01:38

  In order to use it in this way:

  str := :list4||'%';
  rg_id := Create_Group_From_Query( rg_name,
                             'SELECT name,to_char(id) id from test_name where name like ''' || str || '''');
  

• record group records

  How to count the records in the record group?

  Hello
  Get_Group_Row_Count is used to count the records in the record group.

  DECLARE
  RG_ID RecordGroup;
  status NUMBER;
  the_rowcount NUMBER;
  BEGIN
  RG_ID: = find_group ('emp');
  status: = Populate_Group ("emp");
       
       
  the_rowcount: = Get_Group_Row_Count (rg_id);
  MESSAGE (the_rowcount);
  end;

  better compliance
  skyniazi

• Group records in a Select statement

  I want to know, if I can do this with a single select:
  
  I have a table where I have some information with a collar-date:
  

  Column1  Column2  Column3  DateCol
  
  -------
  
  A        B        C        10/2001
  
  A        B        C        03/2001
  
  B        B        C        02/2001
  
  B        B        C        01/2001
  
  A        B        C        03/2000

  Now, I want to bring together the combination of col1-3, but in chronological order. This should be the result:
  

  Column1  Column2  Column3  DateCol
  
  -------
  
  A        B        C        10/2001
  
  B        B        C        02/2001
  
  A        B        C        03/2000

  Any ideas?

  Rumburak wrote:
  It is not a simple question group. Look at my example. The DateCol is the validity of a combination.

  If this is not a simple GROUP BY, then what is? Please explain what you are trying to do.
  That means each line of output represent?
  Why do you want 3 production lines and not 1 or 2, or 4 or 5?
  Why some production lines have distinct values in col1, col2 and col3, and others do not?

  It is possible that you wanted something like this:

  WITH     got_nums     AS
  (
       SELECT     col1, col2, col3
       ,     datecol
       ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY  col1, col2, col3
                                 ORDER BY          datecol
                         )                    AS group_num
       ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( ORDER BY      datecol)     AS overall_num
       FROM     tbl
  )
  SELECT       col1, col2, col3
  ,       TO_CHAR ( MAX (datecol)
                , 'MM/YYYY'
              )          AS datecol_month_year
  FROM       got_nums
  GROUP BY  col1, col2, col3
  ,            overall_num - group_num
  ORDER BY  MAX (datecol)               DESC
  ;
  

  but at least I understand the problem, I can only guess. Guess, this isn't a very effective way to work.

• Using the function count with grouped records

  Hi all
  
  This seems like it should be very easy, but I still have to find a simple way to do it.
  
  Suppose I want to count the possibilities which are grouped by Sales Rep at run time I filter this list with a parameter for sales stage and created date.
  I've simplified this greatly, but here's what my setup looks like now:
  
  Sales representative*-Count* _
  <? for-each-group: opportunity [SalesStage = param1 and creation > param2]; /SalesRep? >
  <? SalesRep? >-<? count (current - group (available))? >
  <? end for each group -? >
  _ Total
  
  The only solution I have to get my grand total so far is to create a variable and permanently keep a total that I will then display in the Total column. It all works, it seems that there should be an easier way, want to do a simple count (Id) for a total general. But given that the Total amount will appear after the end of each group-, I lose the filter that has been applied to the group so that the count is not valid.
  
  Ideas of the experts?
  Thank you!

  To get the total general
  use

  param2]/Id)?>
  

  Since you have not mentioned the complete xml code, I assumed, as the root.
  If this isn't the case, put the full path from the root.

  If you give some xml examples and explain the output you want, we can fix it immediately.

  go through these too... something can be drawn from here.
  http://winrichman.blogspot.com/search/label/summation%20In%20BIP
  http://winrichman.blogspot.com/search/label/BIP%20Vertical%20sum

• Oracle BI group records

  Hi all! I have a difficult situation when I'm BI project.
  I have the folder with 3 interactive dashboards. 2 it is hidden.
  When I see the top of my BI Windows I see the name of my file, and when I click on it in the menu I can change my dashboard only. But I need to see the name of the folder. I want to see the name of the dashboard immediately when a log on.
  More of him in my account dashboard hidden above the window, I see the name of the folder. And when I click on it nothing not.
  Please help me. He is very impotent for me.
  
  PS Sorry for my English.

  Fedor,

  Try to change the permissions on your dashboard. Give permission on the dashboard that you want the user to see when it connects will hide automatically other dashboards.

  -Red

• Is there a limitation of length of sql in a record group?

  Record group contains 4 by union funcion sql statement. When this sql statement longer than 4000 characters then the record group do not allow me to add an additional column to another.

  My question is, is there a limitation of length of sql that record the group support?

  Developer 10g suit.

  Thanks in advance.

  As you have discovered that there is a limit in the form designer, on what size the SQL statement may be in the property Query Group Record in your record group.  Unfortunately, the forms for the Query Group property help topic Record does not that there is a limit or the limit.

  If your request does not fit into the Group Record Query property, you can try to use the integrated Create_Group_From_Query() to fill in your group.  Another option would be to create views in your database, and then select the view in the Query property group Record.

  If you opt to try the method of Create_Group_From_Query(), just set your Group Record in the navigation of the object by using a SELECT statement (your column names) twice and then programmatically remove the Group and re-create it with the high - Create_Group_From_Query ().  See the help topic for the function integrated for a code example.

  Craig...

• A function can be called record group - Oracle Form 6i.

  Hi all

  I want to create query based LOV in Oracle Form 6i.

  The query I have use of the record group is as follows:

  SELECT DISTINCT

  Nr.rec_locator AS rec_locator,

  car.car_dte AS car_date,

  Get_car_info(:CON.) REF_NO) AS car_number

  Car_list_entries CAR

  contact_details cdt,

  name_records nr

  WHERE car.car_id = cdt.car_id

  AND cdt.nr_id = nr.id

  AND cdt.con_ref_no =: CON. REF_NO

  / * Get_car_info (x NUMBER) is a function of form * /.

  This generates an error:

  It is said

  FRM-12001 (impossible to create the Group Record (check your query)

  
  

  Kindly guide how can I use the function of form to achieve the desired result.
  

  Thank you very much

  Anoop.

  Hi Anoop,

  I can assure you that the issue is not because of the called function of the record group.

  I used the query showing the value of the function; but one thing you should keep in mind is:

  If you create a new item not related in a based lov to sql expression that

  return a character data type, and if the element related to the used in the function

  is generated with a size of 0, then the item not related is generated

  with a size of 4000 and a compilation of the form failed with error FRM-30187

  the solution to this problem is: lov property > column specification > columns one will be having a greater length and 2000 it set its 2000 which is the maximum value. Then it won't work.