Group records between trade unions

Similar Questions

• How to filter records in a UNION ALL query

  Hi all

  I have only one requirement to filter records in a query UNION all. If we do not all matching records to one of the union, all question them.

  create table test_1(n1 number,n2 number,n3 number)
  
  insert into test_1 values(1,2,3);
  insert into test_1 values(11,22,33);
  insert into test_1 values(55,66,77);
  
  Case-1 :
  
  SELECT N1,N2,N3
  FROM TEST_1
  WHERE N2=2
  UNION ALL
  SELECT N1,N2,N3
  FROM TEST_1
  WHERE N3=3
  
  Output is : This is desired output(so we are good)
  
  1,2,3
  1,2,3
  
  Case 2 :
  
  SELECT N1,N2,N3
  FROM TEST_1
  WHERE N2=22
  UNION ALL
  SELECT N1,N2,N3
  FROM TEST_1
  WHERE N3=44
  
  Output : (Here is the problem: If we don't have matching records for anyone union all query we don't want any records)
  
  Output is coming : 11,22,33
  
  Out put : No Records (We want this output.)
  

  I hope I have given the clear example of my requirement.

  Thank you.

  with

  test_1 as

  (select 1 n1, n2 2, n3 3 of all the double union)

  Select 11,22,33 from all the double union

  Select double 55,66,77

  )

  Select the n1, n2, n3

  from (select n1, n2, n3

  of test_1

  where n2 =: n2

  Union of all the

  Select the n1, n2, n3

  of test_1

  where = n3: n3

  )

  where exists (select null from test_1 where n2 =: n2)

  and it exists (select null from test_1 where = n3: n3)

  Concerning

  Etbin

• Count the number of records between two values of keys (BTREE)

  How can I count the number of keys between two values?

  I use python driver and BTREE access method.

  = >

  Ideally, what I want is a set of whole time series data (intervals may change) to a given number of points on average. The keys are timestamps and the values are the data that it takes on average. I need to count the number of records between two timestamps so that I can divide this figure by the number of points I need and data on average. What is the best way to do it?  Or should I keep the timestamp constant intervals and use the RECNO access method?

  Thank you
  (first post btw... and why is there not a lot of people at stackoverflow that answering the questions of Berkeley DB?)

  BDB is an integrated db and there no internal counters or statistics you might grap to use for this.    You will have to do it manually.

  You can create a cursor, grap the records you want, whenever you get the next card that you bump a counter.

  If you are using RECNO, you can use a slider to obtain the number of registration (DB_GET_RECNO), and if all that you data is in

  sequentail records with no missing documents, you can find the total number of take the last rec #-original rec # + 1 to get a count.

  If you pass the SQL API, you can issue a SQL query to give you a count.  Select count (*) where...

  As you enter the data anyway, so better perhaps to count records as you go along.

  Thank you

  Mike

• Get records between two Dates

  Hello
  
  I have my structure of the table and records build here
  http://sqlfiddle.com/#! d099ef/4/7
  
  I would like to get the records between two dates.
  For example, I would get the records between October 1, 2001 and October 31, 2001.
  
  How can I get the records. Any help is much appreciated.
  
  Concerning
  
  Published by: ponic on 29 August 2012 09:42

  ponic says:

  Start       End
  4th Jul    12th Dec
  4th Jul    10th Oct
  3rd Oct   19th Nov
  3rd Oct   4th Oct
  

  I would like to have all the lines between October 1, 2001 and October 31, 2001
  If the above lines because every OCTOBER under the foregoing.

  Thank you

  Try

  select *
  from products_range
  where product_start_date <= to_date('31-oct-2001', 'dd-mon-yyyy')
  and product_end_date >= to_date('1-oct-2001', 'dd-mon-yyyy')
  

  Published by: Paul Horth on August 29, 2012 00:46

• SQL to group records and apply logic to pick up a record of each group

  Hi friends,
  
  I am looking for a query group records on some columns in a table and then each group I want to take just a single folder according to certain rules.
  
  Could have given arranged at will to make my point more clear for you. Here you go:

  CREATE TABLE AD_LIST
  (
    FILE_NAME             VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
    ACTIVITY_START        DATE,
    ACTIVITY_END          DATE,
    DIVISION              VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
    ITEM_CODE             VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
    MULT                  NUMBER,
    RETAIL                NUMBER,
    AD_PAGE               VARCHAR2(1 BYTE),
    FORECAST              NUMBER,
    MEMO                  VARCHAR2(50 BYTE)
    );
  
  INSERT INTO AD_LIST VALUES ('FILE_1','01-APR-2010','15-APR-2010','B',1111,5,10,'A',10,'This must be in my result');
  INSERT INTO AD_LIST VALUES ('FILE_1','01-APR-2010','15-APR-2010','B',1111,1,1,'B',15,'Must not be in my result');
  INSERT INTO AD_LIST VALUES ('FILE_1','01-APR-2010','15-APR-2010','B',1111,6,15,'C',11,'Must not be in my result');
  
  INSERT INTO AD_LIST VALUES ('FILE_1','16-APR-2010','30-APR-2010','N',1111,4,20,'D',40,'Must not be in my result');
  INSERT INTO AD_LIST VALUES ('FILE_1','16-APR-2010','30-APR-2010','N',1111,5,15,'E',30,'Must not be in my result');
  INSERT INTO AD_LIST VALUES ('FILE_1','16-APR-2010','30-APR-2010','N',1111,1,2,'F',20,'This must be in my result');
  
  CREATE TABLE PAGE_RANK
  (
    AD_PAGE VARCHAR2(1 BYTE),
    RANK NUMBER
  );
  
  INSERT INTO PAGE_RANK VALUES ('A',1);
  INSERT INTO PAGE_RANK VALUES ('B',2);
  INSERT INTO PAGE_RANK VALUES ('C',3);
  INSERT INTO PAGE_RANK VALUES ('D',4);
  INSERT INTO PAGE_RANK VALUES ('E',5);
  INSERT INTO PAGE_RANK VALUES ('F',6);
  COMMIT;
  
  SELECT * FROM AD_LIST
  
  FILE     ACTIVITY     ACTIVITY          ITEM               AD
  NAME     START          END          DIV     CODE     MULT     RETAIL     PAGE     FORECAST     MEMO
  -----     --------     ---------     ---     ----     ----     -----     ----     ------     -----------------------     
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     5     10     A     10     This must be in my result
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     1     1     B     15     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     6     15     C     11     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     4     20     D     40     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     5     15     E     30     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     1     2     F     20     This must be in my result

  Now, the AD_LIST table I want to group records based on FILE_NAME, ACTIVITY_START, ACTIVITY_END, DIVISION, ITEM_CODE.
  So, in my example here, we have 2 grouped recordset based on the specified columns.
  
  Also, we have a table, PAGE_RANK, who has a rank corresponding to each issue of ad_page. 1. This is a rank higher than 2. This is why page ad 'A' takes precedence over 'B '. The same for all the other pages of ads.
  
  Now, we need to choose an announcement of each ad group in determining page ad rank higher within the Group and the value of mult and retail should be replaced by the value that has min(retail/mult). So, using the above data we will have with the full-page ad = 'A' and ad = page had ' as final results since they have the highest grade of advertising page in their group.
  The value of values mult and details of ad_page 'A' = min (10/5, 1/1, 15/6) = 1,1(mult,retail).
  The value of values mult and detail of ad_page would be ' = min (20/4, 15/5, 2/1) = 1,2(mult,retail).
  
  Finally I have this query below

  SELECT a.file_name,
         a.activity_start,
         a.activity_end,
         a.division,
         a.item_code,
         FIRST_VALUE (a.mult) OVER (PARTITION BY a.file_name, a.activity_start, a.activity_end, a.division, a.item_code ORDER BY (a.retail /
                                                                                                                                  a.mult))
                                                                                                      mult,
         FIRST_VALUE (a.retail) OVER (PARTITION BY a.file_name, a.activity_start, a.activity_end, a.division, a.item_code ORDER BY (a.retail /
                                                                                                                                    a.mult))
                                                                                                    retail,
         FIRST_VALUE (a.ad_page) OVER (PARTITION BY a.file_name, a.activity_start, a.activity_end, a.division, a.item_code ORDER BY (b.RANK))
                                                                                                   ad_page,
         a.forecast,
         a.memo                                                                                                 
    FROM ad_list a, page_rank b
   WHERE a.ad_page = b.ad_page

  This query is giving me all the records, but with the values of what I wanted in the columns Ad_Page, Mult, and retail.
  How can I take only one of each group.
  
  I get this

  FILE     ACTIVITY     ACTIVITY          ITEM               AD
  NAME     START          END          DIV     CODE     MULT     RETAIL     PAGE     FORECAST     MEMO
  -----     --------     ---------     ---     ----     ----     -----     ----     ------     -----------------------     
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     1     1     A     15     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     1     1     A     10     This must be in my result
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     1     1     A     11     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     1     2     D     20     This must be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     1     2     D     30     Must not be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     1     2     D     40     Must not be in my result

  But I want this

  FILE     ACTIVITY     ACTIVITY          ITEM               AD
  NAME     START          END          DIV     CODE     MULT     RETAIL     PAGE     FORECAST     MEMO
  -----     --------     ---------     ---     ----     ----     -----     ----     ------     -----------------------     
  
  FILE_1     4/1/2010     4/15/2010     B     1111     1     1     A     10     This must be in my result
  FILE_1     4/16/2010     4/30/2010     N     1111     1     2     D     20     This must be in my result

  I have to run this query for thousands of such combination of group.
  Hope someone can shed some light on this query.
  
  Thanks in advance,
  Raj.

  Hello

  This is called a Query Top - N .

  How do you determine which line of each group you want to display?
  If this is the line with forecasts as low, then:

  WITH   got_r_num     AS
  (
  SELECT a.file_name,
         a.activity_start,
         a.activity_end,
         a.division,
         a.item_code,
         FIRST_VALUE (a.mult) OVER (PARTITION BY a.file_name, a.activity_start, a.activity_end, a.division, a.item_code ORDER BY (a.retail /
                                                                                                                                  a.mult))
                                                                                                      mult,
         FIRST_VALUE (a.retail) OVER (PARTITION BY a.file_name, a.activity_start, a.activity_end, a.division, a.item_code ORDER BY (a.retail /
                                                                                                                                    a.mult))
                                                                                                    retail,
         FIRST_VALUE (a.ad_page) OVER (PARTITION BY a.file_name, a.activity_start, a.activity_end, a.division, a.item_code ORDER BY (b.RNK))
                                                                                                   ad_page,
         a.forecast,
         a.memo,
         ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY  a.file_name
                                 ,                  a.activity_start
                     ,            a.activity_end
                     ,            a.division
                     ,            a.item_code
                     ORDER BY       a.forecast
                   )      AS r_num
    FROM ad_list a, page_rank b
   WHERE a.ad_page = b.ad_page
  )
  SELECT file_name,
         activity_start,
         activity_end,
         division,
         item_code,
         forecast,
         mult,
         retail,
         ad_page,
         memo
  FROM   got_r_num
  WHERE  r_num     = 1
  ;
  

  If it is something else, then change the ORDER BY clause in the ROW_NUMBER function.

• Findout incompatibility records between the two tables.

  I need help on findout the unmatched records between two different tables.
  
  Each table has a + 42Crores Records.
  
  The type of data (Char) are the same for the two tables but datalength is different between a table and the table B.
  
  Indexes are created on the two tables on the required fields
  
  There is no Geom data exists on the two tables.
  
  
  
  For example:
  
  A Table: =.
  Number of records + 42Crores
  Rating: TOLD char (20)
  
  Table B: =.
  Number of records + 42Crores
  Field: TOLD Char (16)
  
  I took individual accounts, there are number of difference is 3868 only, with respect to the count (*) selection.
  
  I ran the query "Select TOLD OF A LESS SELECT TOLD OF B", but I don't have the answer.
  
  Please let me know how to solve the problem.

  The variable length char shouldn't be a problem...
  You just need to ensure that the first table has more lines than the second, if the problem persists You ' l I hide it, and then use a column alias...

  Let know us...

• selection of the missing records between 2 duplicity without worrying about tables of records

  Hi all

  I have received_bills and send_bills of 2 tables.

  The SEND_BILLS table is the source table displaying all records in it.

  I need to compare two tables together and insert all the missing elements in received_items including duplicate records.

  There may be duplicate in 2 tables records.

  I wrote a query, but it does not select the duplicate records if it's all the 2 tables. When the same duplicate records are send_bills and received_bill without worrying because send_bills has 4 of them and received_bill 2, it does not select the other 2 duplicate records. And it's just what I need.

  the query is

  SELECT SEND. POINT OF REFERENCE,

  Send. PAYMENT,

  Send. CODE

  OF SEND_BILLS SEND

  WHERE THERE IS NOT (SELECT REC. DATUM, PAYMENT, REC. REC. CODE

  OF RECEIVED_BILLS REC

  WHERE REC. REFERENCE = SEND. SCRATCH CARDS

  AND REC. PAYMENT = SEND. PAYMENT

  AND REC. CODE = SEND. CODE)

  send_bills records

  OCTOBER 10, 15	19	A1
  OCTOBER 10, 15	19	A1
  OCTOBER 10, 15	19	A1
  OCTOBER 10, 15	29	A3
  OCTOBER 10, 15	47	A4
  9 OCTOBER 15	19	A8
  OCTOBER 10, 15	20	A1
  OCTOBER 10, 15	19	A1
  OCTOBER 10, 15	25	A5
  OCTOBER 10, 15	25	A5

  received_bills records

  OCTOBER 10, 15	19	A1
  OCTOBER 10, 15	29	A3
  OCTOBER 10, 15	47	A4
  OCTOBER 10, 15	19	A1

  the result of the query is:

  OCTOBER 10, 15	25	A5
  OCTOBER 10, 15	25	A5
  OCTOBER 10, 15	20	A1
  9 OCTOBER 15	19	A8

  So he selects all the records

  the result should be

  OCTOBER 10, 15	25	A5
  OCTOBER 10, 15	25	A5
  OCTOBER 10, 15	20	A1
  9 OCTOBER 15	19	A8
  OCTOBER 10, 15	19	A1
  OCTOBER 10, 15	19	A1

  --------------------------------------------------------

  -The DOF for Table SEND_BILLS

  --------------------------------------------------------

  CREATE TABLE SEND_BILLS

  (DATE OF "DATUM",

  NUMBER OF "PAYMENT."

  'CODE' VARCHAR2 (5 BYTE)

  )  ;

  --------------------------------------------------------

  -The DOF for Table RECEIVED_BILLS

  --------------------------------------------------------

  CREATE TABLE 'RECEIVED_BILLS '.

  (DATE OF "DATUM",

  NUMBER OF "PAYMENT."

  'CODE' VARCHAR2 (5 BYTE)

  )  ;

  -Insert the script for send_bills

  Insert into SEND_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 19, 'A1');

  Insert into SEND_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 19, 'A1');

  Insert into SEND_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 19, 'A1');

  Insert into SEND_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 29, 'A3');

  Insert into SEND_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 47, 'A4');

  Insert into SEND_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('09-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 19, 'A8');

  Insert into SEND_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 20, 'A1');

  Insert into SEND_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 19, 'A1');

  Insert into SEND_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 25, 'A5')

  Insert into SEND_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 25, 'A5')

  -Insert invoices received from script

  Insert into RECEIVED_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 19, 'A1');

  Insert into RECEIVED_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 29, 'A3');

  Insert into RECEIVED_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 47, 'A4');

  Insert into RECEIVED_BILLS (DATUM, CODE) values (to_date('10-OCT-15','DD-MON-RR'), 19, 'A1');

  Can someone please help me with the query so that I can also select all the missing records, including duplicates.

  Thanks in advance.

  Best regards

  Caroline

  If you should by all means use loop and then (send_bills and received_bills contain the same data as your original post):

  Select the reference, payment, code

  of (with

  Duplicator (Datum, Payment, code, CNT) as

  (select the reference, code, payment, cnt - 1).

  from (select datum, payment, code, count (one) - cnt count (two)

  (select date, payment, code, 1 one, to_number (null) two)

  of send_bills

  Union of all the

  Select datum, payment, code, to_number (null), 2 two

  of received_bills

  )

  Reference group, code

  having count (one)! = count (two)

  )

  Union of all the

  Select the reference code, payment, cnt - 1

  The duplicator

  where cnt > 0

  )

  Select the reference, payment, code

  The duplicator

  )

  DATUM	PAYMENT	CODE
  10/09/2015	19	A8
  10/10/2015	19	A1
  10/10/2015	25	A5
  10/10/2015	20	A1
  10/10/2015	19	A1
  10/10/2015	25	A5

  Concerning

  Etbin

• FILL MONTHS DYNAMICALLY IN THE ITEM VIA ORACLE FORMS GROUP RECORDING LIST

  Experts

  I have a query in oracle forms. I need to fill Last_Month, Current_Month & Next_month based on Sys_Date in the list box. I am able to get the values in SQL if I run the query below, but when I use the version of Oracle Forms 10.1.2.0.2, I could not get the values of Mr. can you please guide me where I'm wrong.

  declare

  v_rg_id recordgroup: = NULL;

  Number of V_errorcode;

  v_rg_salmth varchar2 (30): = "MONTHS";

  Begin

  v_rg_id: = find_group (v_rg_salmth);

  If id_null (v_rg_id) then

  v_rg_id: = create_group_from_query (v_rg_salmth,

  "WITH (AS MONTH_COUNTER)

  SELECT LEVEL 2 AS ID

  OF THE DOUBLE

  CONNECT BY LEVEL = 2

  UNION

  SELECT LEVEL AS ID

  OF THE DOUBLE

  CONNECT BY LEVEL = 0

  )

  SELECT TO_CHAR (ADD_MONTHS (TO_CHAR (SYSDATE), ID), MONTH) AS MONTH_COUNTER MONTHS ');

  v_errorcode: = populate_group (v_rg_id);

  If v_errorcode = 0 then

  message ("record group filled with data");

  on the other

  message ("V_errorcode is:" | ") v_errorcode);

  end if;

  End if;

  populate_list('MASTER.) MONTH, v_rg_id);

  end;

  The rather complicated query, try

  SELECT ADD_MONTHS (SYSDATE-1) TO DOUBLE

  UNION ALL

  SELECT SYSDATE DOUBLE

  UNION ALL

  SELECT THE DOUBLE ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,1)

  BTW. to use a query to populate a list, you must select two values, a label and a value, check it fill listitems dynamically - Andreas Weiden - on Oracle

• Group records as well as frequent mailers

  Hi people,

  I'm looking at a scenario where I would like to group the dates together (for the most part, we assume they are similar and close enough dates and so probably on the same date) when they are close together. The idea is to eliminate the possible duplicates.

  Create table scripts and INSERT into the table:

  create table orders_tb (order_id varchar2(4), order_date date);
  
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1001',to_date('31-DEC-13','DD-MON-RR'));
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1001',to_date('02-JAN-14','DD-MON-RR'));
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1001',to_date('06-JAN-14','DD-MON-RR'));
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1001',to_date('12-JAN-14','DD-MON-RR'));
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1002',to_date('02-FEB-14','DD-MON-RR'));
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1002',to_date('02-MAR-14','DD-MON-RR'));
  insert into orders_tb (order_id,order_date) values ('1002',to_date('02-MAR-14','DD-MON-RR'));
  

  If I ran the following SELECT statement, I would get 6 entries:

  select distinct order_id, order_date from orders_tb order by order_id, order_date;
  

  However, for the most part, I would like to Order ID 1001 subject only two records. The rule for including dates, that is all the dates to be within 10 days of the date of MIN.

  1001 31-DEC-2013
  1001 12-JAN-2014
  

  Regarding the command ID 1002, he will tell you that the dates are very far.

  1002 02-FEB-2014
  1002 02-MAR-2014
  

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you!

  Hello

  You want to always 2 rows for each order_id exit or you want sometimes 1 or 3 or more?

  You can test it with a little more data sample that test situations like these.  For example, in addition to the sample data that you posted:

  insert into orders_tb (order_id, order_date) values ('1001 ', to_date('13-JAN-2014','DD-MON-YYYY'));

  insert into orders_tb (order_id, order_date) values ('1001 ', to_date('19-JAN-2014','DD-MON-YYYY'));

  insert into orders_tb (order_id, order_date) values ('1001 ', to_date('25-JAN-2014','DD-MON-YYYY'));

  insert into orders_tb (order_id, order_date) values ('1003 ', to_date('01-JAN-2014','DD-MON-YYYY'));

  insert into orders_tb (order_id, order_date) values ('1003 ', to_date('10-JAN-2014','DD-MON-YYYY'));

  Here's one way:

  WITH got_next_date AS

  (

  SELECT DISTINCT

  order_id, order_date

  MIN (order_date) over (PARTITION BY order_id) AS start_date

  MIN (order_date) over (PARTITION BY order_id

  ORDER BY order_date

  RANGE BETWEEN 10.000001 MORE

  AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING

  ), Next_date

  Of orders_tb

  )

  SELECT order_id, order_date

  OF got_next_date

  START WITH order_date = start_date

  CONNECT BY order_date = next_date PRIOR

  AND order_id = order_id PRIOR

  ;

  Output (including the sample data, I added):

  ORDER_ID, ORDER_DATE

  -------- -----------

  1001 December 31, 2013

  1001 12 January 2014

  1001 January 25, 2014

  1002 February 2, 2014

  1002 2 March 2014

  1003 1 January 2014

• Grouping records

  Hi all
  
  I have this table

  WITH taba
          AS (SELECT   83573 AS id, 135433 AS pe_rule_id, 46493 AS uc_id
                FROM   DUAL
              UNION ALL
              SELECT   83574 AS id, 135433 AS pe_rule_id, 46512 AS uc_id
                FROM   DUAL
              UNION ALL
              SELECT   83557 AS id, 137004 AS pe_rule_id, 47277 AS uc_id
                FROM   DUAL
              UNION ALL
              SELECT   83558 AS id, 139647 AS pe_rule_id, 47277 AS uc_id
                FROM   DUAL
              UNION ALL
              SELECT   83571 AS id, 144804 AS pe_rule_id, 46493 AS uc_id
                FROM   DUAL
              UNION ALL
              SELECT   83572 AS id, 144804 AS pe_rule_id, 46512 AS uc_id
                FROM   DUAL)
  SELECT   *
    FROM   taba

  I need to get all records with MIN (ID), that have the same group uc_id records.
  Return:
  135433 46493
  46512 135433
  137004 47277
  
  For example, 2 = 144804 pe_rule_id records have both the same uc_id as the chronogram pe_rule_id = 135433 2. In this case, I need only the records pe_rule_id = 135433
  
  This is just one example. I may have records with 3 or more uc_id diferent to the same pe_rule_id.
  
  Can you help me please?
  Thank you
  
  Filipe Almeida

  Do you mean min (pe_rule_id)?

  Like this?

  SQL> ed
  Wrote file afiedt.buf
  
    1  WITH taba
    2          AS (SELECT   83573 AS id, 135433 AS pe_rule_id, 46493 AS uc_id
    3                FROM   DUAL
    4              UNION ALL
    5              SELECT   83574 AS id, 135433 AS pe_rule_id, 46512 AS uc_id
    6                FROM   DUAL
    7              UNION ALL
    8              SELECT   83557 AS id, 137004 AS pe_rule_id, 47277 AS uc_id
    9                FROM   DUAL
   10              UNION ALL
   11              SELECT   83558 AS id, 139647 AS pe_rule_id, 47277 AS uc_id
   12                FROM   DUAL
   13              UNION ALL
   14              SELECT   83571 AS id, 144804 AS pe_rule_id, 46493 AS uc_id
   15                FROM   DUAL
   16              UNION ALL
   17              SELECT   83572 AS id, 144804 AS pe_rule_id, 46512 AS uc_id
   18                FROM   DUAL)
   19  select pe_rule_id, uc_id
   20  from taba where pe_rule_id in (
   21     SELECT   min(pe_rule_id)
   22     FROM   taba
   23     group by uc_id
   24*    having count(*) > 1)
  SQL> /
  
  PE_RULE_ID      UC_ID
  ---------- ----------
      137004      47277
      135433      46512
      135433      46493
  

  Published by: BluShadow on August 3, 2011 13:26
  p.s. Thanks for providing data in an easy to use format. :)

• Why can't share tv recorded between 2 vista media center machines?

  TV registered on a machine can not be played on the other on a cable network even if the files can be shared, & have read/write permissions.

  Hi foxprints.

  Which edition of Windows Vista you are running on your system? Both the same?

  We must have the group policy in the editions of Vista that is present only in Vista Ultimate.

  But I can suggest a solution here and you can try to see if it works.

  NOTE: Important this section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:

  322756 how to back up and restore the registry in Windows: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/322756

  To change the strategy of group stuff use regedit and go to:

  \System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanManSe rver\Parameters\NullSessionShares {HKEY_Local_Machine}

  If NullSessionShares there is not add that I did as a multiple string and Add TV recorded in this list.

  Also go to the {HKEY_Local_Machine} \System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\RestrictAnonymous
  and make sure that who is disabled.

  For more information, you can also refer to:

  http://thegreenbutton.com/forums/p/48133/393219.aspx

  For further assistance, you can also post your request here:

  http://thegreenbutton.com/forums/default.aspx

  Hope this information was useful.

  Let me know if it worked.

  Thank you, and in what concerns:

  UMA R - Engineer Support Microsoft Answers

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• BlackBerry smartphone how to change view Contact to see category / group records only

  Hi everyone, just got my first BlackBerry.

  The Bold (9000) is the best screen.

  To be honest, I was anti-BlackBerry when they first came out.

  Did not like the feel of plastic.

  Now that the "BOLD" is here, and for some time, finally I turned.

  After using it for only a week, I must say, I am very impressed and now intend to continue to use it.

  I will also continue to have a second very basic phone.

  I thought that most of the things, even added many additional services, most of them style of Google.

  SE BIS, soon change BES to access our new SBS Exchange work.

  Even some of the most difficult functions, services and settings can be solved for me.

  I do not work in a dealership take Optus, mainly focused on business.

  On the issue...

  Is it possible to get your hands (first / default) connect with view to display the 'files' only category.

  I really wish I could open my contacts, select my category, then search.

  For me, it would be so much easier.

  For example. CONTACTS-Office-Steve

  or CONTACTS-family-MOM

  or CONTACTS-friends-David

  or CONTACTS-Optus-Wireless Technical Support

  This would save search me, especially since some contacts may have a different name, then I expect first (for example, 'hundreds' of Optus numbers, can be 'Pre-activation ULL' or 'Fixed installation support line')

  I guess he will have to show contacts that have not been assigned to a group (category).

  If these contacts have been enumerated below the category records, it would be ideal (for me).

  Perhaps, even if there was a possibility to classify them with the records of the category FIRST then all contacts in alpha?

  I know that a contact can be assigned to several categories (very useful).

  If this isn't an option, are there any recommended additional applications that can do this?

  I hope as clean and efficient as BlackBerry original aps.

  A few years ago, I used a Windows based mobile/PDA.

  To get more out of it, I also installed several aps SPB.

  Ultimately if an additional access point is required and is not free (IE must buy), it would really need a trial period.

  Thanks to anyone for ANY Advisor.

  I'm happy to be part of a more professional group.

  Ian

  This option as a view is not available on the BlackBerry, and I'm not aware of any third-party application to do, there could be.

  One option would be to name all your groups in such a way that they would appear first in your Contact list.

  As instead of naming a group of 'Friends', you would be the name "." See list Friends"with a period at the beginning, which will force this group name to the top of the Contact.

• What is the preferred means of data transmission as a type of record between the nested table of pl/sql program or an associative array

  What is the preferred means of data transmission in the associative array of the nested table record vs

  Choose between Nested Tables and associative arrays

  The two nested tables and associative arrays (formerly index - by tables) use similar index notation, but they have different characteristics when it comes to persistence and ease of passing parameters.

  Nested tables can be stored in a column of data, but can of associative arrays. Nested tables can simplify the SQL operations where you would normally join a single-column table with a larger table.

  Associative arrays are appropriate for relatively small lookup tables where the collection can be constructed in memory whenever a procedure is called or a package is initialized. They are good for the collection of the information volume is unknown beforehand, because there is no fixed limit on their size. Their index values are more flexible, as associative array indices can be negative, can be no sequential and can use values of string instead of numbers.

  PL/SQL automatically converts between the bays of the host and the associative arrays that use values of digital keys. The most effective way to move the collections to and from the database server is to implement data values in associative arrays, and then use these associative arrays with erections in bulk (the FORALL statement or BULK COLLECT clause).

  With the help of documents and Collections of PL/SQL

  Read this:

  How to pass the record set as a parameter of the procedure.

  https://community.Oracle.com/thread/2375173?TSTART=0

• Group records with time

  Hi all
  
  This is our requirement.
  
  We must combine records with time.
  
  for example: period = 3
  TABLE: XX_SALES
  ---------------------------------------------
  XDATE XQTY
  ---------------------------------------------
  10 5/1/2012
  20 2/5/2012
  3/5/2012 30
  4/5/2012 60
  12 2012/5/7
  8/5/2012 23
  45 8/5/2012
  100 12/5 / 2012
  5/2012/13 55
  5/2012/15 99
  
  == >
  ---------------------------------------------
  XDATE XQTY
  ---------------------------------------------
  1/5/2012 10-> 5/1/2012 Group (5/1/2012 ~ 3/5/2012)
  2/5/2012 20-> 5/1/2012 Group (5/1/2012 ~ 3/5/2012)
  3/5/2012 30-> 5/1/2012 Group (5/1/2012 ~ 3/5/2012)
  4/5/2012 60-> Group 5/2012/4 (4/5/2012 ~ 2012/5/6) *.
  7/5/2012 12-> Group 5/2012/7 (5/7/2012 ~ 9/5/2012) *.
  8/5/2012 23-> Group 5/2012/7 (5/7/2012 ~ 9/5/2012) *.
  8/5/2012 45-> Group 5/2012/7 (5/7/2012 ~ 9/5/2012) *.
  5/2012/12 100-> Group 5/12/2012 (2012/5/12 ~ 14/5/2012) *.
  13/5/2012 55-> Group 5/12/2012 (2012/5/12 ~ 14/5/2012) *.
  5/15/2012 99-> Group 5/15/2012 (15/5/2012 ~ 5/17/2012) *.
  
  After amount to combine with period = 3, the result will be
  ---------------------------------------------
  XDATE_G XQTY_G
  ---------------------------------------------
  60 1/5/2012
  4/5/2012 60
  2012/5/7 80
  12/5/2012 155
  5/2012/15 99
  
  
  Here's the example script

   
  create table XX_SALES(XDATE DATE, XQTY Number);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120501','YYYYMMDD'),10);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120502','YYYYMMDD'),20);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120503','YYYYMMDD'),30);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120504','YYYYMMDD'),60);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120507','YYYYMMDD'),12);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120508','YYYYMMDD'),23);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120508','YYYYMMDD'),45);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120512','YYYYMMDD'),100);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120513','YYYYMMDD'),55);
  insert into XX_SALES VALUES(to_date('20120515','YYYYMMDD'),99);
   

  We can solve this problem by using the loop now:
  to find the XDATE_G and it's rank in the loop and the XQTY in the range of the sum.
  

  DECLARE
    V_DATE_FROM DATE := NULL;
    V_DATE_TO   DATE := NULL;
    V_QTY_SUM   NUMBER := 0;
    CURSOR CUR_DATE IS
      SELECT DISTINCT XDATE FROM XX_SALES ORDER BY XDATE;
  BEGIN
    FOR REC IN CUR_DATE LOOP
      IF V_DATE_TO IS NULL OR REC.XDATE > V_DATE_TO THEN
        V_DATE_FROM := REC.XDATE;
        V_DATE_TO   := REC.XDATE + 3 - 1;
        SELECT SUM(XQTY)
          INTO V_QTY_SUM
          FROM XX_SALES
         WHERE XDATE >= V_DATE_FROM
           AND XDATE <= V_DATE_TO;
        DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(TO_CHAR(V_DATE_FROM, 'YYYYMMDD') ||
                             '-----qty: ' || TO_CHAR(V_QTY_SUM));
      END IF;
    END LOOP;
  END;

  Is it possible to solve this problem by using analyze sql?
  
  
  Thanks in advance,
  Best regards
  Zhxiang
  
  Published by: zhxiangxie on April 26, 2012 14:41 fixed the grouping expected data

  There was an article about a similar problem in Oracle Magazine recently:

  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/issue-archive/2012/12-Mar/o22asktom-1518271.html

  See the section on the 'grouping beaches '. They needed a total cumulative who started once the total reaches a certain amount.

  You need a total cumulative which starts again when the date changes to group and the dates of beginning and end of each group must be determined dynamically.

  This can be done with the analytical functions.

  Here is a solution-based 'code listing 5', the solution MODEL, which is recommended in the article.

  SELECT FIRST_DATE, SUM(XQTY) SUM_XQTY FROM (
    SELECT * FROM xx_sales
    MODEL DIMENSION BY(ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY XDATE) RN)
    MEASURES(XDATE, XDATE FIRST_DATE, XQTY)
    RULES(
      FIRST_DATE[RN > 1] =
        CASE WHEN XDATE[CV()] - FIRST_DATE[CV() - 1] >= 3
        THEN xdate[cv()]
        ELSE FIRST_DATE[CV() - 1]
        END
    )
  )
  GROUP BY first_date ORDER BY first_date;
  
  FIRST_DATE            SUM_XQTY
  --------------------- --------
  2012/05/01 00:00:00         60
  2012/05/04 00:00:00         60
  2012/05/07 00:00:00         80
  2012/05/12 00:00:00        155
  2012/05/15 00:00:00         99
  

  If you 9i, there is no function model. In this case, I can give you a solution using START WITH / CONNECT BY that does not work as well.

• Output and group records into several column format problem

  Hi all

  I'm banging my head on the wall with this one. I have a query that displays the result in the form of two columns, it works fine.

  I have a problem when I try to use "group"for the field DSC1 doesn't show duplicates."  He transforms the output in column 2, column 3 and column 4 spots white all along.

  Someone knows how can I get it to display 2 columns of output and does not show in double DSC1 fields? The following are examples of what is happening:

  
  

  1 example of what he does without group (note to Apple is twice, which is not):

  Apples apples

  Orange peaches

  banannas grapes

  What I need to do (only show each DSC1 once and continue with the format of two columns) :

  oranges apples

  Fisheries banannas

  grapes

  Here is the code I use:

  < cfquery name = "getProduct" datasource = "mydb" >
  SELECT * from ecitm
  WHERE DSC1 <>' '
  order by DSC1

  < / cfquery >

  <! - start the 2-column output table - >

  < table border = "0" width = "90%" border = "0" align = "center" cellpadding = "5" cellspacing = "5" >
  
  < cfset newrow = false

  < b >
  < cfoutput query = "getProduct" group = "DSC1" >
  
  < cfif newrow EQ "true" >
  < b >
  < / cfif >
  < td >
  #DSC1 #.
  < cfif DSC2 NEQ "" > "".
  < br >
  #DSC2 #.
  < / cfif >

  < br >
  < a href = "DetailsList.cfm? ID = #getProduct.ID # & litm = #getProduct.LITM #" > VIEW < /a > DETAILS
  < table >
  
  < cfif getProduct.currentRow MOD 2 EQ 0 >
  < /tr >
  < cfset newrow = true >
  < cfelse >
  < cfset newrow = false >
  < / cfif >

  
  < / cfoutput >
  < /tr >
  < /table >

  The currentRow always property will count the number or records in the record setting loop, if you their output or not.

  Since you are not the output values for each record in the Recordset, you must count the itterations yourself.

  Put a meter of itteration before the loop.

  Update the counter at the top of the loop.

  OR on newer versions of CF

  Reset the counter in the true clause of the block, where you also define new line. >

  Then use the variable in the iit instead the currentRow property to determine the number of items have been posted.

  **** OR ****

  You could do a simple SQL command does not get duplicates first and then use a loop of simple without any of the grouping and additional logic that you do.

  
  
  SELECT DISTINCT *
       FROM ecitm
       WHERE DSC1 <> ' '
       ORDER BY DSC1
  
  
  
  
       #DSC1#