Similar Questions

• Windows service install is missing from my Windows Vista Home Premium, 32-bit system, after uninstalling other software (IOLO System Mechanic)

  Windows service install is missing from my Windows Vista Home Premium, 32-bit system, after uninstalling other software (IOLO System Mechanic). After a month of looking for the installation Service, I finally found that a group of 10 files and among them was this executable file
  x86_microsoft-windows-p... installerandprintui_31bf3856ad364e35_6.0.6002.18005_none_d83fb8abf30e1638_printui.exe_bb673fff
  If these are the files I'm looking for, what should I do to get them back to where they should do? Any help would be appreciated...

  System Mechanic is your troublemaker & you have lots of company! [1]

  See my colleague Maurice RESPONSE message in this thread: http://answers.microsoft.com/thread/d6fedf33-dc1b-451f-9aab-97429f916180

  If still no joy, contact System Mechanic (iolo.com) supported for assistance-, they are well aware of the problem posed their candidacy.

  TIP: If you think that more never your registry database needs to be cleaned, repaired, boosted, to the point, healed, twisted, fixed, magnified, "swept" or optimized (and even more to convince that it is not), read http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099 and draw your own conclusions. See also http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2005/10/02/registry-junk-a-windows-fact-of-life.aspx

• Can I restore my copies of Office and other software from a Windows XP Backup?

  I did a full backup of my system Windows XP, including MS Office and other software. I upgraded the system to Windows Vista. Can I restore the backup XP MS Office and other software on Vista?  I installed backup-restore of Windows NT on Vista and open the backup file, selected the folders I wanted to restore and begun to restore. The documents have been restored correctly but SW such as the Office was not. SW files have been restored, but they are not "installed" i.e. do not work, I think it's obvious, but I don't know how to install.

  Thank you.

  original title: restore backup XP on Vista

  In this case, you must reinstall the programs, as has already advised it.

  "If you did a clean install, it's different.

  Programs need to be reinstalled from the original media (CD, DVD, etc.). »

  You can not copy programs installed from another hard drive or a backup.

  The only way that works is if it was a picture of complete backup of XP from the operating system installed and you need to reinstall the full XP Image for the program to work again in this OS XP...

  See you soon.

• Just installed Mac OS 10.11 (El Capitan) and now can't print from Photoshop CS5.  All other software including working Lightroom 4 mode "Impression".

  I just installed Mac OS 10.11 (El Capitan) and now can't print from Photoshop CS5.  All other software installed, including 4 of Lightroom, has not printing problems.  Contacted Apple and they said that it is a problem for Adobe.

  Help?

  When you reinstall CS5, you start to 12.0 there's a 12.0.4 update that includes bug fixes.

  You need to directly download this update and before you install, go into osx security & privacy > general tab and temporarily allow app installs anywhere.

  Adobe - Photoshop: for Macintosh: Adobe Photoshop 12.0.4 updated for Adobe Photoshop CS5

• Article update: Harden your Mac from malicious software attacks

  Sorry if this is posted in the wrong place.

  Article

  Harden your Mac from malicious software attacks

  Harden your Mac from malicious software attacks

  Seems to be outdated. ( Changed the: July 12, 2013 19:28 46816 views )

  It is the Firefox Mozilla Knowledge Base article

  • Fix Firefox problems caused by malicious software
  • Link firefox:mac https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/troubleshoot-firefox-issues-caused-malware#

  Note

  • This is the official site of support of Firefox that is bound to the User Interface of Firefox browsers.
  • This Mozilla document can not be an article on it, but still had 10s of thousands of views.

  Is someone able to update this document or suggest other resources or document to include in the document of Mozilla?

  Personally, I don't use a Mac.  One point which can be exceeded in the Apple support document some of the references to the clams.

  Is ClamXav graphic version is no longer free?  (https://www.clamxav.com/changetocommercialsoftware)

  There is also now a product available from how Malwrebyes 2015 is considered within the Apple community.
  (Yes I realize that as Linux and Android, you will have less malware and adware issues than the MS OS)

  • Anti-Malware for Mac https://www.malwarebytes.org/antimalware/mac/

  It's free and (probably) equivalent Windows software is well regarded in the Mozilla community.

  Thanks in advance,

  John

  Mac users often ask if they should install "anti-virus" (AV) or software "anti-malware". The answer is 'no', but it can give the false impression that there is no threat of what is loosely called 'virus '. There is a threat.

  1. it is a comment on what you should - and should not-do to protect you from malicious software ("malware") that runs on the Internet and gets onto a computer as an unintended consequence of the user's actions.

  It does not apply to the software, such as keyloggers, which can be installed deliberately by an intruder who has convenient access to the computer, or who has been able to take control of it remotely. This threat is in a different category, and there is no easy way to defend against it. AV software is not intended to and does not, to defend against these attacks.

  The comment is long because the issue is complex. The essential points are in articles 5 and 11.

  OS X implements now three levels of integrated protection specifically against malware, not to mention the protections of runtime such as quarantine the file, execute disable, sandbox, protecting the integrity of system, System Library randomization and randomized address space layout , which can also prevent other kinds of exploits.

  2. all versions of Mac OS X 10.6.7 were able to detect the malware Mac known in downloaded files and block non-secure web plugins. This feature is transparent to the user. Apple calls internally it "XProtect."

  The malware used by XProtect recognition database is automatically updated. However, you should not count on it, because the attackers are still at least a day before the defenders.

  The following restrictions apply to XProtect:

  ☞ circumvented by some third-party network software, such as the BitTorrent clients and Java applets.

  ☞ It applies only to software downloaded on the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not verified.

  As new versions of Mac OS X are available, it is not clear whether Apple will continue indefinitely maintain the older versions such as 10.6 XProtect database. Versions of obsolete systems security may eventually be affected. Updates to security for the code of obsolete systems will be stop being released at any given time, and which can leave them open to other types of attack in addition to malware.

  3. starting with the OS X 10.7.5, there was a second layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and installation packages downloaded from the network will be run only if they are digitally signed by a developer to a certificate issued by Apple. Certified software in this way has not been checked for safety by Apple, unless it comes to the App Store, but you can be reasonably sure that it has not been changed by someone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so it could be held legally responsible if it distributes malicious software. Which may not mean much if the developer lives in a country with a weak legal system (see below).

  Access controller does not depend on a database of known malware. He has, however, the same limitations as XProtect and in addition the following:

  ☞ It can easily be turned off or overridden by the user.

  ☞ A malware attacker could find a way around it, or could take control of a certificate of signing of code under false pretenses or could simply ignore the consequences of the distribution of malware Tryggvason.

  ☞ Developer App store could find a way around the Apple control, or the control may fail due to human error.

  Apple took too long to revoke some known attackers codesigning certificates, thus diluting the value of the keeper and the program developer ID. These variances do not involve the App Store products, however.

  For the reasons given, App Store, and, to a lesser extent - other applications recognized by signed Gatekeeper, are safer than others, but they cannot be considered to be absolutely sure. "Sand" applications could make to access to private data, such as your contacts, or for access to the network. Think that before granting access. Security sandbox is based on user input. Never click through any application for leave without thinking.

  4. by starting with OS X 10.8.3, a third layer of protection has been added: a "Malware Removal Tool" (MRT). MRT runs automatically in the background. He checks and removes, malware that corresponds to a database of recognition held by Apple. To ensure that MRT will be executed when the database is updated, the App Store tab in system preferences and check the box marked

  Install the system data files and security updates

  If it is not already done.

  As XProtect, MRT is effective against known threats, but not against strangers. It alerts you if it detects malware, but otherwise, it has no user interface.

  5. the built-in Mac OS x security features reduce the risk of malware attack, but they are not and will never be complete protection. Malware is a problem of human behavior, not a behavior machine, and none only of technological solution will solve. Software protect you from trust only will make you more vulnerable.

  The best defense is always going to be your own intelligence. Except perhaps feats of Java, all the known malware, circulating on the Internet wearing reached a completely setting installation to update to OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "Trojans", which may have no effect if the victim is deceived in their execution. The threat thus amounts to a battle of wits between you and cybercriminals. If you are better informed, they think you are, you win. In effect, it means that you always stay in the shelter of practical computing. How do you know when you leave the safe harbor? Here are a few signs warning of danger.

  Software from a reliable source

  ☞ Software with a brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, does not come directly from the Web site. Don't be fooled an alert of any website for updating Flash, or your browser, or other software. A real alert that Flash is outdated and blocked is shown on this support page. In this case, follow the instructions on the support page. Furthermore, assume that the alert is false and that someone is trying to rip you off to install malicious software. If you see these alerts on more than one Web site, ask for instructions.

  ☞ Software any is distributed via BitTorrent or Usenet, or on a Web site that distributes pirated music and movies.

  ☞ Rogue sites Web such as CNET Download MacUpdate, Soft32, Softonic and SourceForge distribute free applications that have been packaged in a superfluous "install".

  ☞ The software is advertised through spam or intrusive web ads. Any announcement, on any site, which includes a direct link to a download should be ignored.

  Software that is clearly illegal or doing something illegal

  Commercial software ☞ high-end such as Photoshop is "cracked" or "free."

  ☞ An application helps you violates copyright law, for example to circumvent the copy protection on a commercial software, or streamed media recording to be reused without permission. All the 'YouTube downloaders' are in this category, but not all are necessarily malicious.

  Conditional or unsolicited offer from strangers

  ☞ A phone calling or a web page you indicates that you have a "virus" and offers to remove. (Some reputable sites warned visitors who have been infected with the malware "DNSChanger" legitimately. The exception to this rule applies.)

  ☞ A web site offers a free content like music or video, but for use, you must install a "codec", 'plug-in', 'player' 'Downloader', 'extractor', or 'certificate' which comes from the same site, or a stranger.

  ☞ You win a prize in a competition that you are never entered.

  ☞ someone on a forum like this is eager to help you, but only if you download an application of your choice.

  ☞ a 'FREE WI - FI!' network presents itself in a public place like an airport, but is not provided by management.

  ☞ Online everything that you expect to pay is 'free '.

  Unexpected events

  ☞ a file is downloaded automatically when you visit a web page, without any further action on your part. delete any file without opening it.

  ☞ You open what you think, it is a document and you receive an alert that it is "an application downloaded from the Internet." Click Cancel and delete the file. Even if you don't get the alert, you must always remove any download that is not what you expected it to be.

  ☞ An application does something you don't expect, such as permission to access your contacts, your location or the Internet without obvious reason.

  ☞ Software is attached to the email you na not ask, even if it is (or seems to come) by a person of trust.

  I do not leave the safe harbour that once will necessarily lead to disasters, but make a habit of it will weaken your defenses against malicious software attacks. None of the above scenarios must, at the very least, make you uncomfortable.

  The emergence of data "ransomware" for Mac was part of the defense against the attacks of backup all data. Since an infected machine could destroy its own backups, at least a backup unit must always be in offline mode. For example, you could turn your backup drives, keeping one with you or another site. This strategy also protects against a physical threat such as a fire or theft.

  6. Java on the Web (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it is not related, despite the similarity of names) is a weak point in the security of any system. Java is, among other things, a platform to run complex applications in a web page. That was always a bad idea, and Java developers have proved unable to apply it without also creating a portal for malware to enter. Past Java exploits are the closest thing there has ever been a type virus Windows affecting OS X. simply load a page with Java malicious content could be harmful.

  Fortunately, client-side Java on the Web is outdated and largely disappeared. Only a few outdated sites still use it. Try to accelerate the process of extinction by avoiding these sites, if you have a choice. Forget to play games or other uses not Java essentials.

  Java is not included in OS X 10.7 and later versions. Discrete Java installers are distributed by Apple and Oracle (the developer of Java). Do not use one unless you need it. Most of the people don't. If Java is installed, turn it off- not the JavaScript in your browser.

  Whatever the version, experience has shown that Java on the Web is not reliable. If you must use a Java applet for a job on a specific site, Enable Java only for the site in Safari. Never activate Java for a public Web site that carries the third-party advertising. Use only on websites that are well known, protected by login and secure without ads. In Safari 6 or later, you will see a padlock icon in the address bar when you visit a secure site.

  7. another perennial weak point is Adobe Flash Player. Like Java, Flash is declining well deserved, but content Flash is still much more widespread than the contents of Java on the Web. If you choose to install the Flash plugin, you can reduce your exposure to Flash by checking the box marked

  Stop the plug-ins to save energy

  in the Advanced tab of the preferences of Safari window, if not already done. Consider also installing an extension Safari as "ClickToFlash" or "ClickToPlugin." They will prevent the Flash content automatically load and are initially not Flash video is substituted for Flash on YouTube and perhaps a few other sites. I tested the extensions and found them safe, but you should always do your own research before you decide whether to trust any third party software.

  8. remain within the sphere of security, and you will be as safe from malware you can be practically. The rest of this comment is what you must do to protect you.

  Although it may seem counterintuitive, you should never install any AV or products 'Internet security' for Mac if you have a choice, because they are all worse than useless. If you are required by a (wrong) institutional policy to install some kind of AV, choose one of the free apps in the Mac App Store, nothing else.

  Why you should not use products AV?

  ☞ To recognize malware, software depends on a database of known threats, which is always at least one day to day. This technique is a proven failure, as a major supplier of AV software has admitted. Most of the attacks are "zero-day" - that is, previously unknown. Recognition-based AV does not defend against such attacks, and the enterprise IT industry comes to realize that the traditional AV software is worthless.

  ☞ design is based generally on the nonexistent threat that malware can be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; He is not of the blue leaves. To meet this threat does not exist, a commercial AV software changes or low level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a frequent cause of instability, bugs, poor performance, and duplicates.

  ☞ changing the operating system, the software can also create weaknessesthat could be exploited by malicious attackers.

  ☞ especially, a false sense of security is dangerous. This fact relates to all AV software it will never be any changes elsewhere.

  Using the software AV defines you for double exploitation: by hackers, malicious software, that the software does not protect you and the actual AV industry. The latter will often try to hang with a product free of appeal , so it can charge you for "improvements" later.

  9. a free AV product from the Mac App Store is safe as long as you don't let it delete or move files. Ignore all the warnings that it can give you on "heuristic" or "phishing." These warnings, if they are not simply false positives, see the text of e-mail messages or updates cached web pages, not malware. Also ignore any attempt to upsell you to a paid version of the product.

  An AV application is not necessary and may not be invoked for protection against malware for OS X. It is useful, or even not at all, only to detect malware Windows and even for this use it is not really effective, because the new Windows malware makes its appearance much faster than OS X malware.

  Windows malware cannot hurt you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows). Just do not pass to someone else. A malicious link in the e-mail is usually easy to recognize by the name alone. A concrete example:

       London Terror Moovie.avi [124 spaces] Checked By Norton Antivirus.exe

  You don't need software to tell you it's a horse Trojan for Windows. Software may be able to tell what trojan is, but who cares? In practice, there is no reason to use a recognition software, unless an organizational strategy requires. Malware Windows is so widespread that you must assume that it is in each attachment until proof to the contrary.

  A free AV product on the App Store can serve a purpose if it fulfills a misinformed network administrator that requires to have some sort of application AV. An App Store product will not change the operating system; in fact, it does nothing, unless you run it.

  If you are just curious to know if a file is recognized as malware by the AV engines, you can download it from the "VirusTotal" site, where it will be tested against most of them. A negative result is evidence of what whether, for the reasons given above. I do not recommend doing this with a file that may contain private information.

  10. There seems to be a common belief that the firewall Application acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents operation of malware. He does not. It blocks incoming connections to some network services you are using, such as file sharing. It is disabled by default, and you should leave it like that if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate only when you are on an untrusted network, for example a public Wi - Fi hotspot, where you do not want to provide services. Disable services that you don't use in the sharing preferences window. All are disabled by default.

  11. as a Mac user, you don't have to live in fear that your computer may be infected whenever you install the software, read emails, or visit a web page. But nor can you assume that you will always be free from exploitation, no matter what you do. Internet browsing, it's like walking the streets of a big city. It can be as safe or as dangerous that you choose to do so. The greatest harm done by software AV is precisely its selling point: it makes people feel safe. They can then feel sufficiently safe to take risks, which the software does not protect them. Nothing can reduce the need for safe computing practices.

• AA in comparison with other software

  I was wondering, since there are so many other software on the market and AA is just one of them, how AA compares with the other software out there? I am a user of AA and don't use any other software and I heard very good reviews on other software like Cubase, Logic, Protools, etc...

  In fact, what are the benefits of using Adobe Audition instead of other DAW software?

  joshuazidane wrote:

  In fact, I don't really no this statement, cause "hearing isn't really a very good place to create music as such, but it's a great place to assemble once it is audio files", I am quite new to present and create music and editing music sounds the same to me. Could you elaborate a little on what they mean individually? Thank you

  Creating music with music software usually is to be able to do things like setting the different tempos and to make arrangements of grid which can be manipulated, and almost all cases they have highly integrated with this arrangement noon - and that's what the hearing has (and not if she...). On the other hand, software music isn't a separate edition on which a page variety of separate operations conducted destructively (when you save them, the changes are permanent) can be done - at least not easily. So if you want to create what I call "mechanical" music - which is what are your more commercial orders is today, so something like Cubase or Logic would do well - it has all the extras, like keyboards integrated piano, drum of grids, sequencers interactive expression, rating integrated and heaven knows what else. And hearing just doesn't have those. However, if you want to save what I would call 'acoustic' music, then hearing is very good - the original concept was based on how works an old analog multitrack machine, only with a slightly new tilt insofar as it was non-destructive - everything that happens in the multitrack view is that your files are played in a selective way - they are not 'edition '. so not at all.

  What I received your response, is that the hearing is simply the best to control music and editing of music with its built-in effects (e.g., reverb, phaser,...). But when it comes to MIDI sounds or Synth via a midi controller and multitrack different instruments, it is nothing compared with the other big names. Is this fair? But other big-name software do not come with a wide range of control and editing tools, too? So what's good hearing what other software can not match up?

  I didn't know that the hearing was a late entrant. Laughing out loud. I thought that cool edit pro started around the same time as cubase, etc... lol

  He wouldn't put it quite like that - you can do perfectly good multitracking of acoustic instruments with her, after all. Other "big names" software generally have nothing like the ability for hearing editing - that's why broadcasters from all over the world use it. Where hearing scores highly here is that it is fairly intuitive and incredibly fast as an editor, and there are always several ways to do things. Thus, for example, if you have a load of bits of the interview, background effects, music, and you need to create a package in a hurry, you can change the interviews in the editing mode down to usable of the word blocks, batch these in individual files and then assemble your production set in multitrack view slippery things around however you like and then mix it easily down to a single file broadcastable. And the music software just won't let you do something like that at all - or if this is the case, it would be very awkward and you will probably lose the will to live while you do.

  I am sure that Cubase began well before even Cool Edit 96, which came well before the CEP, and that it was originally called twenty-four Pro and ran on the Atari. But the big difference is that Cubase actually started as a MIDI sequencer and made no audio at all. NOON came not at hearing up to 2.0, and it was pretty basic (still is). There are many of us who believe firmly that noon should not be on the hearing - this is not strictly a function of installation/Assembly. The only good news on this subject is that it is completely hidden if you do not want to use - and apparently it's officially my fault, and I'm very happy to take all the blame for this.

  With respect to the control, either incidentally, it's a little more to it. Hearing is inherently more accurate than, for example, ProTools, which has an audio performance of piss-poor, and even if they don't admit to him very often, almost all supposed PT users keep a copy of Audition autour - simply because for mastering, it is way better. ProTools uses an interface 24 bits wide with a limited dynamic range that gets reduced even more if you size things on it, but engine hearing using 32-bit floating-point algorithms, eliminating scaling losses, which are generally superior. And when it comes to sample rate conversions, hearing was independently assessed as being the best - there are quite certainly for money. And by the way, this 32-bit engine also makes audio mixdowns generally better - it is inherently more accurate at all. Among other things, I use hearing for classical music of wide dynamic range editing, and I don't get any complaints about the sound at all. I would certainly have something as PT confidence could do this, even if - last time I used it, I really was not at all satisfied with the sound quality, I had and I know that I am not alone in this view. It is also why many passive mixers after-market are sold to PT users - they get more own mixes their use they make of the software.

  If really it's horses for courses - hearing isn't exactly a pony a thing, but I would say it is not software really versatile music at all. OTOH, music software generally isn't facilities decent edit - which explains why in something like Sonar you will have the opportunity to use Audition as an external editor - which many people do. They complement each other would probably be the best way to look at it, I'd say.

• When I try to import the Favorites of IE using "Import Data from Other Browser" it is grayed out. Why is this?

  I'm trying to follow the instructions of the Firefox Help. Step 2 to import bookmarks is to select the option "Import data from another browser" in history-library-import and backup. However, this option is grayed out for me and I can't select it. Why is this grayed out? How can I make this?

  Make sure that you do not use Firefox mode of private - browsing using Firefox without saving history .

  • To view the history settings and cookies, choose: Firefox > Options > privacy, choose the setting Firefox will: use the custom settings for the story of
  • : Uncheck the [] "always use the private browsing mode.

  Now do-> Import Favorites to Internet Explorer

  Check and tell if its working.

  Not related to your problem, but your Plugins are out of date

  • Update all of your Firefox Plugins-> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/
  • During the installation of the Plugins download files hotfix, remove the check mark to download any other software options with your Plugins (for example, toolbars, McAfee, Google Chrome, etc.)

• Reinstalling operating system and drivers only. Don't want any other software and tools...

  Hello

  I want a clean reinstall on my HP Mini 210. How can I reinstall the operating system and drivers only from the recovery partition? I don't want any other software and tools HP...

  P.S. I've done a reinstall from the recovery partition and then spend many hours, removal of unwanted and tools software, but traces of these programs remain anywhere in the registry, the Program Files folder...

  Here are the specifications of your computer of HP Mini 210-1077CA. According to the specification, this model comes with Windows 7 Starter, which is installed at the factory.

  Please see "Recovery discs to create or save an Image to a USB (Windows 7) recovery" for instructions on creating recovery media. See also "Using System Recovery, Factory Reset and Minimized Image Recovery Options" to determine if your computer supports the "recovery Image reduced" and how to perform this recovery option, if it supports.

  Reduced Image recovery does the following:
  Reinstall the original operating system.
  Re-installs all the drivers of original material.
  Reinstall the HP essential software (e.g., HP Support Assistant, HP Recovery Manager, etc.).
  Don't install applications for testing or trial games.

  Please click the White Star of KUDOS to show your appreciation

• Malware 'non-genuine windows' shows and other software (Acronis) not said that this is the evaluation version when it is the paid-up version.

  I've been running windows 7 64 bit with SP1 and all the updates that are known for 10 months without any problem.  Now, a 'non-genuine windows' malware appear and other software (Acronis) not said this is the evaluation version when it's the fully paid for version.  What should I do to solve this problem.  Rick Rickard

  You must read the user final license agreement and you will find that the OEM licenses have restrictions. You need to understand.

  If you want to move windows from one computer to another, you need a full commercial license.
  This same problem is again this morning on another computer where he runs a real operating system from microsoft, Windows 7 32 bit SP!, more than 4 months.  Today he says that my win 7 op sys is not authentic.  This computer has been customized built so I was the first to install a sys op on it.
  
  
  After a diagnostic for the analysis report.

• Problem with Photoshop, Cinema 4 d and a few other software Windows icon.

  I'm having a problem of icon with Photoshop, Cinema 4 d and some other software.  Any help is greatly appreciated.  There are glimpses in the screenshot below:

  

  No idea. But it is up to the application provider, you could ask Adobe.  Maybe the header of the file is different.  Or maybe a user has clicked and made a new option 'open with', which changes the icon.

• Buy windows 7 key from other sellers other then Microsoft?

  Buy windows 7 key from other sites? There are various sites web windows key selling.  like (removed) is key is authentic?

  Absolutely NOT!

  It is asking for trouble.

  Only buy windows 7 from a reputable store or Microsoft.

  There is NO cheap bargains which are legitimate.

  Places like who still sell these buyers activation keys and still pretty suspicious that end by have non-genuine software.

• BlackBerry Smartphones how can I compress pictures by roxio or other software to save memory space?

  My photos are usually 4MB. I am currently compress every photo less than 100 KB before copying to save memory space on my "BOLD", but it is laborious. I hoped that roxio would do this for me, but it seems fair to copy like-for-like. Is there a function in roxio or any other software that will accelerate this process for me?

  I have recently updated from Pearl to "BOLD", and I'm in love. I followed messages on this site and solved 90% of the minor issues, I had, so thank you for all the help a lot.

  You can use a program like Photoshop, Gimp to do. Most graphics programs come with some sort of compression software.

  You transfer on the device memory or a media card? If they are on a media card, them they don't are not recorded in the memory of the device and you wouldn't have to worry about their compression

• Unable to print from other programs like Gimp and the error is "your photos cannot be printed because this error occurred.

  Original title: I can print from other programs such as Gimp, just not windows live photo

  When I first installed Windows Live I could print very well but now I have the same box that says "your photos cannot be printed because this error occurred.  I looked in the forums and found several answers, but none that have the situation corrected.

  Hello

  Thanks for posting your question in the Microsoft Community.

  From your problem description, I understand that you can not to print from the program Gimp and the error is 'your photos cannot be printed because this error occurred'. Please let me know if this isn't the problem that you are experiencing.

  I understand the inconvenience caused to you. I'll help you solve the problem!

  Before troubleshooting, I have little information on the issue.

  1. what type of image file?

  2 are you facing this problem with specific program or all programs?

  3. did you of recent changes to the computer before this problem?

  4. What is the serial number and model of the printer?

  Note (1): If you are faced with the question with all programs, try the methods you haven't tried earlier and then check after each method:

  Method 1: Print a test page:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-CA/Windows7/print-a-test-page

  Method 2: Why can I not print?

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-CA/Windows7/why-cant-I-print

  Note 2: If the problem is with the specific program (Gimp), I suggest you contact the manufacturer of the program.

  http://www.GIMP.org/webmasters.html

  Reference link:

  Picture printing: frequently asked questions: http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/picture-printing-frequently-asked-questions

  If the problem persists, post your reply with the results and the questions asked above. We are happy to help you further!

  It will be useful.

• By combining PowerCLI data with data from other systems

  I have a few PowerCLI data on virtual machines that comes in way like this:

  $vmlist = get - vm | SELECT name, memoryGB, numCPU

  and so on.

  Based on the NAME of these virtual machines, I have a bunch of other info from other systems I have need of aggregation in my report.

  For example, I need to take the name of this virtual machine, move to Active directory and get a lot of other information on the name of the computer as it is in the OU.  I would like to add this information as custom properties to each VM object that exists in the table of $vmlist created previously.

  What is the cleaner to do this way?  Can I take the table of $vmlist and use it to query Active directory and then add a custom property to $vmlist as OrganizationalUnit?

  The cmdlets Get - AD have a fairly limited filter, so you can use the strongest performers in PowerShell-corresponds to the operator on the result returned.

  First, the script collects all the VM names and creates a RegEx with GOLD expresion ('|) ') operator between the names.

  The script combines so vSphere and AD in 1 result

  $names = (get - VM | % {$_.}) Name}) - join ' |'

  Get-ADComputer-filter ' * '-DistinguishedName properties |

  where {$_.} Name - match $names} |

  Select Name,@{N='OU'; E = {$premier, $rest = $_.} DistinguishedName-split ","; {{$rest - join ","}}

• How can I download and reinstall Adobe Photoshop elements 11?  I have a new iMac and all other software converted except Photoshop...

  I bought a new iMac Retna display and converted on my other software from my old iMac.  Most of all applications properly converted, however Adobe Photoshop elements 11 has just launched with an error indicating that we need to reinstall the application.  We have the original serial number but can't find a copy of 11 items on the Adobe site to download and reinstall.  Also, we don't find any contact information for same Adobe support if the messages in the forum of State we need to contact adobe customer service to resolve this problem.

  Please advise...

  Thank you

  Try this link:

  Products download Photoshop Elements | 10, 11, 12, 13>