[Help] Join the query from 3 tables

Hi, I'm new to database. I have a question about joining 3 tables, forgive me for my bad English.

My paintings look like this

Table 1: person (id, firstname, lastname)
Table 2: AssignPersonAddress (id, personid, addressid, type)
Table 3: address (id, phone, street, etc.)

I need AssignPersonAddress table, because in my data structure, a person may have more than 1 address and address type must be registered (for example: private, work)


I want to do a select query to the State any person with his private phone and work phone, like this.
NOBODY | PRIVATE | WORK



Right now my query looks like this
select p.name , a1.tel AS Private, a2.tel AS Work
from person p, 
addresse a1 , 
AssignPersonAddress apd1, 
AssignPersonAddress  apd2, 
addresse a2

where p.id  = apd1.person (+)
and apd1.adresse  = a1.id 
and apd1.art = 'Private' 
and p.objectid = apd2.person (+)
and apd2.adresse  = a2.id 
and apd2.art = 'Work'
the problem is that I only get the person who has a private address and the job. But what I want is all anyone no matter if the person has only 1 or 2 address.

As you can see I put the left outer join in where condition, but I always get the wrong result.


THX in advance


Danny

Published by: raitodn on October 1st, 2009 03:51

Published by: raitodn on October 1st, 2009 04:12

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • Help with the query to select only one record from the result set in double

    Hello

    Please help with the query. Version of Oracle database we use is 10g R2.

    I have a vision that is duplicated IDS, but they are used across the different functions. See below examples of data. Please help me with a query to select only one record (based on ID regardless of the area) from the bottom of the result set of duplicate records. For what is the point of view is there unique records, given the combination of the fields ID, Org, DF, dry, Sub-Sec

    ID
    		Org
    		DF
    		Sec Sub-Sec

    (163)CQCPDMCPDMHD(163)PCENGENGENG(163)CQASICASICIS8888TSTACTACTAC(163)TSHEHESW6789CQINFOINFOFOS6789PCSECSYSSECSYSINFO16789TSSECSYSSECSYSINFO29009PCBMSBMSBMS1

    My result set must eliminate the duplicate identifiers regardless of whoever we choose of the result set. (I mean without distinction Org, DF, s, Sub-s). My expected result set should be.

    ID
    		DSB

    DF
    SEC
    Sub-Sec
    (163)CQCPDMCPDMHD8888TSTACTACTAC6789CQINFOINFOFOS9009PCBMSBMSBMS1


    Thank you

    Orton

    Hello

    This sounds like a job for ROW_NUMBER:

    WITH got_r_num AS

    (

    SELECT id, DSB, df, s, sub_sec org

    ROW_NUMBER () OVER (PARTITION BY ID.

    ORDER BY org

    ) AS r_num

    OF view_x

    )

    SELECT id, DSB, df, sub_sec s,

    OF got_r_num

    WHERE r_num = 1

    ;

    He is a Top - N query example, where you choose the elements of N (N = 1 in this case) from the top of an ordered list.

    I hope that answers your question.
    If not, post a small example of data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT, only relevant columns instructions) to your sample data and the results desired from these data.  (I know that you said that you were a view selection.  Just for this thread, pretending it is a picture and post simple CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements to simulate your point of view).
    Point where the above query is to produce erroneous results, and explain, using specific examples, how you get the right results from data provided in these places.  (I didn't quite understand the explanation above.  I don't know why you want to

    ID ORG DF DRY SUB_SEC

    --      ---     --      ---     -------

    1234 CQ DPRK DPRK HD

    and is not

    1234 IS CQ ASIC, ASIC

    or

    TS 1234 IT IT SW

    or

    1234 CQ ASIC ASIC HD

    )
    If you change the query at all, post your modified version.
    Always say what version of Oracle you are using (for example, 11.2.0.2.0).

    See the FAQ forum: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002

  • need help with the query, thx

    Hello
    I need a little help with the query I have to write;
    the table has 4 columns:
    col1               col2         col3       col4
emp_name     empl_id    salary      year

content of data:

col1               col2         col3       col4
smith             12           1200      1999
smith             12           1340      2000
smith             12           1500      2001
jones             13           1550      1999 
jones             13           1600      2000
aron              14           1200      2002
    what I am asking is the following result: salary according to the latest available year
    i.e.
    smith         12         1500        2001
jones         13         1600        2000
aron          14         1200        2002
    ID appreciate some guidance on how to achieve
    Thank you
    Rgds 
    select *from
(select col1, col2,col3, col4,row_number() over(partition by col1 order by col4 desc)  rn  from 
) where rn=1

  • Join the query/right /.

    Join the query/right /.

    In the end, we try to find the ZZOMTAB. STAFF
    I know the value exists because I have asked this by
    K_NO
    By this query

    Select
    ZZOMTAB. STAFF
    Of
    ZZOMTAB
    where
    K_NO = 146735

    so that's where
    But what I'm left with app_no = 79219

    I tried this query and it does not work (no value in the ZZOMTAB. STAFF)
    SELECT
    ZZOMTAB. STAFF
    OF TKASERTAB
    ZZOMTAB RIGHT JOIN
    ON TKASERTAB. K_NO = ZZOMTAB. K_NO

    APPTAB RIGHT JOIN
    ON TKASERTAB.app_no = APPTAB.app_no

    where
    APPTAB.app_no = 79219


    the value that I'm trying to get is ZZOMTAB. STAFF
    and I give myself with app_no = 79219

    the tables are

    the tables are
    TKASERTAB with K_NO and APPNO columns
    APPTAB with column APPNO
    and
    ZZOMTAB with K_NO

    I'm trying to get the value of ZZOMTAB. STAFF
    Can anyone help?
    Thanks in adv


    Try to move the APPTAB.app_no = 79219 WHERE clause and put it in your RIGHT JOIN.

    SELECT
    ZZOMTAB. STAFF
    OF TKASERTAB
    ZZOMTAB RIGHT JOIN
    ON TKASERTAB. K_NO = ZZOMTAB. K_NO
    APPTAB RIGHT JOIN
    ON TKASERTAB.app_no = APPTAB.app_no
    AND APPTAB.app_no = 79219

    Another thread

    Phil

  • help in registration of the records from two tables

    HI: I have two tables joined the first field. The field is the primary key in the first table. Need help listing records from both tables with each a line/record results.
    create table EVENTS (
event_key varchar2(64) primary key,
event_description varchar2(64),
create_time int
);


create table EVENT_UPDATES (
event_key varchar2(64) NOT NULL ,
update_description varchar2(64),
update_time int
);


insert into EVENTS values('Event1', 'This is event1', 1);
insert into EVENT_UPDATES values('Event1', 'Ticket created', 3);
insert into EVENT_UPDATES values('Event1', 'Event cleared', 10);
insert into EVENTS values('Event2', 'This is event2', 4);
insert into EVENT_UPDATES values('Event2', 'Ticket created', 6);
insert into EVENT_UPDATES values('Event2', 'Event cleared', 8);
    I want to print each record in the table of EVENTS such as a line and the corresponding records in EVENT_UPDATES as a line like this record
    Event1   1     This is event1
            3     Ticket created
            10   Event cleared
Event2   4     This is event2
            6     Ticket created
            8     Event cleared
    TIA
    Ravi 
    select  case weight
          when 1 then event_key
        end key,
        time_val,
        description
  from  (
          select  event_key,
                  create_time time_val,
                  event_description description,
                  1 weight
            from  events
         union all
          select  event_key,
                  update_time,
                  update_description,
                  2 weight
            from  event_updates
        )
  order by event_key,
           weight
/

KEY          TIME_VAL DESCRIPTION
---------- ---------- -------------------------
Event1              1 This is event1
                    3 Ticket created
                   10 Event cleared
Event2              4 This is event2
                    6 Ticket created
                    8 Event cleared

6 rows selected.

SQL>

    SY.

  • Join the execution of several Tables Plan

    Try to understand the query execution plan:
     

HR>  SELECT e.last_name , d.department_name, l.city
  2     FROM employees e, departments d , locations l
  3     WHERE e.department_id = d.department_id
  4   AND
  5           d.location_id = l.location_id;

Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1235509609

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                     | Name             | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT              |                  |   106 |  4346 |     9  (23)| 00:00:01 |
|*  1 |  HASH JOIN                    |                  |   106 |  4346 |     9  (23)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   MERGE JOIN                  |                  |    27 |   837 |     6  (34)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEPARTMENTS      |    27 |   513 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |     INDEX FULL SCAN           | DEPT_LOCATION_IX |    27 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  5 |    SORT JOIN                  |                  |    23 |   276 |     4  (50)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |     VIEW                      | index$_join$_003 |    23 |   276 |     3  (34)| 00:00:01 |
|*  7 |      HASH JOIN                |                  |       |       |            |          |
|   8 |       INDEX FAST FULL SCAN    | LOC_CITY_IX      |    23 |   276 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   9 |       INDEX FAST FULL SCAN    | LOC_ID_PK        |    23 |   276 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|  10 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL           | EMPLOYEES        |   107 |  1070 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    So he needs to MERGE between DEPARTMENTS (that has been sorted by index) JOIN and (here's the part confusing...) LOCATIONS including oracle used HASH JOIN (?) to bring the information from and then sort the opinion generated by the system that has been created...?

    Is that this HASH JOIN to step 7 only refers to a view that is generated by the system that oracle had to sort and not actually HASH JOIN
    between two tables?

    Thanks much for you patience

    Hello

    Perhaps, it helps to understand things better if we walk in the plan.

    Plans have a hierarchical structure (which is translated graphically by fingerprints). Operating needs parent all the children completed operations before it can do its job (which is generally combining lines with children in one way or another).

    Another point is that joins can have anything like their entries, tables not only. That is a hash join can join an index for an index or a table to an index, or then to join a table results of hash one another and so on and so forth.

    With this in mind, we can go back on what is happening here step by step:

    The needs of the join by hash (1) (2) and (10) to finish. (10) is a basic operation, since a table scan depends on nothing else, but merge join handset (2) (3) and (5), who both are complex operations (i.e. dependent on one or more children). Specifically, lines (3) from the DEPARTMENTS table using ROWID obtained from a full analysis of the index of DEPT_LOCATION_IX (4), (5) is simply lines join hash (7) and sorted in the order required.

    I hope this helps.

    Best regards
    Nikolai

    Published by: Nikolay Savvinov on January 26, 2012 05:26

  • Join the query - confused behavior

    Hello.. I need to make a join on four tables and select one data tables. The query is as below,

    SELECT THE VIRTUAL MACHINE. SEGMENT, VM.CA, VM. PR, VM. BP, VM. TERM_ID, VM. TL v_mlr_cable VM, v_neicode NEI, v_mlr MLR, v_fibre_ntwk_type FIBER WHERE MLR.master_key = 62 AND MLR.dslam_tid = NEI.id AND NEI.type = 'OLT' AND MLR.ntwk_type = FIBRE.id AND MLR.master_key = VM.master_key;

    This query works very well. I want to change the query to have an OR condition by combining certain conditions in the WHERE clause as below,

    SELECT THE VIRTUAL MACHINE. SEGMENT, VM.CA, VM. PR, VM. BP, VM. TERM_ID, VM. TL v_mlr_cable VM, v_neicode NEI, v_mlr MLR, v_fibre_ntwk_type FIBER WHERE MLR.master_key = 62 AND ((MLR.dslam_tid = NEI.id ET NEI.type = 'OLT') or MLR.ntwk_type = FIBRE.id) AND MLR.master_key = VM.master_key;

    This translates into several duplicates of the correct result lines (about 93 272 rows).
    I suspect this is a unwanted Cartesian product.
    I am limited to use a 'different' because my application performs custom, so 'distinct' query analysis is out of the option.

    I struggle to understand the result of this query. You can help... ! Thanks in advance.

    My database: Oracle Enterprise Edition 10.2.0.2.0

    Published by: vanessa on June 9, 2011 12:49 AM

    Hello

    Can hide you the SELECT DISTINCT in a subquery, like this:

    SELECT  *
FROM    (
            SELECT DISTINCT  VM.SEGMENT, ...
        );

    or in a view?

    If this is not the case, use GROUP BY. The GROUP BY clause contains all the columns in the SELECT clause.

    You could also re - write the query to use EXISTS or IN, instead of a jon.
    For example:

    SELECT      SEGMENT
,     CA
,     PR
,     BP
,     TERM_ID
,     TL
FROM     v_mlr_cable     vm
WHERE     master_key     = 62
AND     EXISTS (
          SELECT  0
          FROM     v_neicode       NEI
          ,     v_mlr            MLR
          ,      v_fibre_ntwk_type FIBRE
          WHERE     MLR.master_key      = vm.master_key
          AND      (     (     MLR.dslam_tid      = NEI.id
                    AND      NEI.type      = 'OLT'
                    )
               OR      MLR.ntwk_type      = FIBRE.id
               )
            )
;

    Do you think it is easier to read and understand the code formatted, as the query above, or unformatted, as what you posted?
    Who do you think will encourage people to read your question and provide accurate responses?
    Never write, not to mention NPA, not formatted.

    I hope that answers your question.
    If not, post a small example of data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT, only relevant columns instructions) of all the tables and the results desired from these data.
    Explain how you get these results from these data.
    Always tell what version of Oracle you are using.

  • need help with the query: (Frank)

    Hi Frank,.

    I have the oracle 8 database.
    I have the following table with the data structure:

    TABLE P (PID, PNAME, COLOR)
    PRIMARY KEY: PID
    PID     Pname    Color
p1...........          Red
P2.................    green
p3...............       blue
p4 ..................   red
    CAT TABLE (SID, PID, COST)
    KEY: SID MAIN + PID
    KEY REFERENCE: SID REFERENCE S.SID
    PID P.PID REFERENCES
    Sid        Pid       COst....
S1        P1
S2        P2
S3        P3
S1      P4
S2       p1
S3        p1
    now my question is:
    I want to find the SIDS of suppliers that provide a red and a green part

    for this I used the following query, but it gives the result worng...

    can help me please in this way to get this...
    select sid from cat
where pid in (select pid from p where color= 'red'
          union
          select pid from p where color = 'gren') 
group by sid having count(pid) >= 2

    Hello

    Jojo wrote:
    Hi Frank,.

    It would be nice if someone with a different name helped you? Do not restrict yourself by addressing someone in particular in your subject line or the first message.

    I have the oracle 8 database.
    I have the following table with the data structure:

    TABLE P (PID, PNAME, COLOR)
    PRIMARY KEY: PID

    PID     Pname    Color
p1...........          Red
P2.................    green
p3...............       blue
p4 ..................   red

    CAT TABLE (SID, PID, COST)
    KEY: SID MAIN + PID
    KEY REFERENCE: SID REFERENCE S.SID
    PID P.PID REFERENCES

    Sid        Pid       COst....
S1        P1
S2        P2
S3        P3
S1      P4
S2       p1
S3        p1

    now my question is:
    I want to find the SIDS of suppliers that provide a red and a green part

    for this I used the following query, but it gives the result worng...

    can help me please in this way to get this...

    select sid from cat
where pid in (select pid from p where color= 'red'
          union
          select pid from p where color = 'gren')
group by sid having count(pid) >= 2

    You don't like what is the number of lines with a pid; If you had 20 rows all said 'p1', that would be good enough. The number of distinct colors of the whole ('red', 'green') is what is important.
    Avoid the UNION when there is a simple alternative. The UNION tends to be slow.

    You can use a join instead, like this:

    SELECT       c.sid
FROM       cat     c
,            p
WHERE       p.pid          = c.pid
AND       p.color       IN ('red', 'green')
GROUP BY  c.sid
HAVING       COUNT (DISTINCT p.color)     = 2
;

    If you would care to post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for the sample data and the results that you want from this data, then I could test this.

    Published by: Frank Kulash, January 10, 2011 15:25

  • Problem with case when try to alter the query from siimple

    Hello PL/SQL gurus and Experts.

    I'm stuck with a question (can be simple), but not gettings all headsway.
    select 365/day_num_yr Anul_Fact from Date where date_dt = trunc(sysdate -1)
    value returns is as - 1.46

    need to write it in the form of case (I have to multiply it to some other outer query), I want to store variable ina and then use the same in an outside -.
    but when use the following syntax, then it always returns 0 and not the same output returned by the query above without the scabbard.
    select (case when date_dt =trunc(sysdate -1) then 365/day_num_yr else 0 END) Anul_Fact
    Help kindly, I appericate your time and effort in advance.

    user555994 wrote:
    Problem is that I do not get the output as 1.46, even the output is coming like the 0 only if using the query - next

    select /*date_dt, sysdate - 1 prev_dt, trunc(sysdate - 1) trunc_prev_dt,*/
case when date_dt = trunc(sysdate -1) then  365/day_num_yr
else 0
end num_day
from date_dim;

    Completely, which seems to be a question of DATA. Have you checked if the table contains data for DATE_DT = SYSDATE - 1? Can you check if the data stored do not have hours and Minutes stored?

    Although I have provided examples of data, which is the same as the data in my main table and once I used the previous solution you provided and then also gives the result as same as those mentioned by you.

    I think it's something like -

    select date_dt, sysdate - 1 prev_dt, trunc(sysdate - 1) trunc_prev_dt,
case when date_dt = trunc(sysdate -1) then  366/day_num_yr where day_num_yr=(select day_num_yr from date_dim where date_dt = trunc(sysdate -1))
else 0
end num_day
from date_dim;

    Once we get the day_num_yr then he deviding by 366/day_num_yr :(
    but he does not like throwing an error ORA-95 - missing keyword

    Yes, it does not work

    -case when date_dt = trunc (sysdate-1) then 366/day_num_yr where day_num_yr = (select day_num_yr from the date_dim where date_dt = trunc (sysdate-1))

    due to a syntax of alien.
    I don't think that you really need. I already said, with the data in your Table, you will be having only * 1 * record with a Non - zero value. Thus, simply apply a filter to extract the corresponding record SYSDATE - 1 and you should get an output which is Non-zero. If you apply a where predicate, then would not need you a CASE statement. You can directly use something like below:

    select date_dt, sysdate - 1 prev_dt, trunc(sysdate - 1) trunc_prev_dt,
       365 / day_num_yr num_day
  from t4
 where date_dt = trunc(sysdate - 1);

    Published by: Jen K, September 7, 2012 16:00

  • Please help improve the query with the analytic function

    The mentioned below query takes about 10 hours to complete (10.2.0.4).

    There are 3 tables (table t has a relationship 1: n with table e and k table also has a relationship 1: n with table e).
    Table a contains 200,000 lines. (this table is truncated and inserted several times a week)
    E table contains rows of 1Mio.
    K table contains rows of 170Mio.

    drop table t;
create table t
(
   t_id number,
   constraint t_pk primary key (t_id)
);

drop table e;
create table e
(
   e_id number,
   e_doc nvarchar2(16),
   e_date date,
   constraint e_pk primary key (e_id)
);

drop table k;
create table k (
   t_id number,
   e_id number
);

create unique index k_i1 on k(t_id, e_id);

exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 'T');
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 'K');
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 'E');



-- Sample data:

insert into t(t_id) values (100);
insert into t(t_id) values (101);
insert into t(t_id) values (102);
insert into t(t_id) values (103);


insert into e(e_id, e_doc, e_date) values (200, 'doc 200', to_date('01.01.2010', 'DD.MM.YYYY'));
insert into e(e_id, e_doc, e_date) values (201, 'doc 201', to_date('02.01.2010', 'DD.MM.YYYY'));
insert into e(e_id, e_doc, e_date) values (202, 'doc 202', to_date('03.01.2010', 'DD.MM.YYYY'));
insert into e(e_id, e_doc, e_date) values (203, 'doc 203', to_date('04.01.2010', 'DD.MM.YYYY'));
insert into e(e_id, e_doc, e_date) values (204, 'doc 204', to_date('05.01.2010', 'DD.MM.YYYY'));
insert into e(e_id, e_doc, e_date) values (205, 'doc 205', to_date('06.01.2010', 'DD.MM.YYYY'));
insert into e(e_id, e_doc, e_date) values (206, 'doc 206', to_date('07.01.2010', 'DD.MM.YYYY'));
insert into e(e_id, e_doc, e_date) values (207, 'doc 207', to_date('08.01.2010', 'DD.MM.YYYY'));

insert into k(t_id, e_id) values (100, 200);
insert into k(t_id, e_id) values (100, 201);
insert into k(t_id, e_id) values (100, 202);
insert into k(t_id, e_id) values (100, 203);

insert into k(t_id, e_id) values (101, 203);
insert into k(t_id, e_id) values (101, 204);





select k.t_id, e.e_date,  e.e_id, e.e_doc
from   e, k, t
where  k.e_id = e.e_id
and    k.t_id = t.t_id
order by k.t_id, e.e_date desc;


      T_ID E_DATE         E_ID E_DOC
---------- -------- ---------- ----------------
       100 04.01.10        203 doc 203
       100 03.01.10        202 doc 202
       100 02.01.10        201 doc 201
       100 01.01.10        200 doc 200
       101 05.01.10        204 doc 204
       101 04.01.10        203 doc 203
    I need a query that takes the latest 3 posts for a given t_id:
          T_ID E_DOC_LIST
---------- -----------------------
       100 doc 200/doc 201/doc 202
       101 doc 203/doc 204


Sample query:

select t_id, e_doc_list
   from (
   select  k.t_id,
        row_number() over(partition by k.t_id order by k.t_id, e.e_date desc) r_num, 
        rtrim(       lag(e.e_doc, 0) over(partition by k.t_id order by k.t_id, e.e_date) || 
              '/' || lag(e.e_doc, 1) over(partition by k.t_id order by k.t_id, e.e_date) || 
              '/' || lag(e.e_doc, 2) over(partition by k.t_id order by k.t_id, e.e_date), 
              '/') e_doc_list
     from  e,
           k,
           t
     where  k.e_id = e.e_id
     and    k.t_id = t.t_id
     order by k.t_id, e.e_date desc
) where  r_num = 1   ;


      T_ID E_DOC_LIST
---------- --------------------------------------------------
       100 doc 203/doc 202/doc 201
       101 doc 204/doc 203
    The example query takes several hours in production.
    The r_num = 1 filter is applied quite late. Is there another way to generate the query or even review the tables.
    For the sample query:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                        | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                 |      |     6 |   468 |     6  (50)| 00:00:01 |
|*  1 |  VIEW                            |      |     6 |   468 |     6  (50)| 00:00:01 |
|*  2 |   WINDOW SORT PUSHED RANK        |      |     6 |   216 |     6  (50)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    WINDOW SORT                   |      |     6 |   216 |     6  (50)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                 |      |     6 |   216 |     4  (25)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |      MERGE JOIN                  |      |     6 |   198 |     4  (25)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| E    |     8 |   208 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |        INDEX FULL SCAN           | E_PK |     8 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  8 |       SORT JOIN                  |      |     6 |    42 |     2  (50)| 00:00:01 |
|   9 |        INDEX FULL SCAN           | K_I1 |     6 |    42 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 10 |      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN           | T_PK |     1 |     3 |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter("R_NUM"=1)
   2 - filter(ROW_NUMBER() OVER ( PARTITION BY "K"."T_ID" ORDER BY
              "K"."T_ID",INTERNAL_FUNCTION("E"."E_DATE") DESC )<=1)
   8 - access("K"."E_ID"="E"."E_ID")
       filter("K"."E_ID"="E"."E_ID")
  10 - access("K"."T_ID"="T"."T_ID")


and for query in production

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                 | Name         | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT          |              |  3118K|   425M|       |   160K  (1)|
|   1 |  VIEW                     |              |  3118K|   425M|       |   160K  (1)|
|   2 |   SORT ORDER BY           |              |  3118K|   163M|   383M|   160K  (1)|
|   3 |    WINDOW SORT PUSHED RANK|              |  3118K|   163M|   383M|   160K  (1)|
|   4 |     WINDOW SORT           |              |  3118K|   163M|   383M|   160K  (1)|
|   5 |      HASH JOIN            |              |  3118K|   163M|    40M| 33991   (1)|
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL   | E            |  1053K|    28M|       |  4244   (1)|
|   7 |       NESTED LOOPS        |              |  3118K|    80M|       | 21918   (1)|
|   8 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL  | T            |   144K|  1829K|       |   282   (2)|
|   9 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN   | K_I1         |    22 |   308 |       |     1   (0)|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    TimWong765 wrote:
    ...
    Table a contains 200,000 lines. (* this table is truncated and inserted several times a week *)

    You could be in one of the rare cases where the index should be rebuild, take a look in the following thread:
    http://asktom.Oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:6601312252730 #69571308712887 (search for 'index of Sweeper')
    Make sure that you have checked if you are in this case before going for an expensive index rebuild.

    Nicolas.

  • Need help with the query string manipulation

    Hello

    With the help of 10.1.0.4.2

    Given a table called PREFIX_CODES that contains a column called PREFIX_CODE
    with the following data:

    PREFIX_CODE - VARCHAR2 (20)
    -------------------
    AAA
    BENAMER
    CARTER

    and another table called SUBSCRIBERS with a column called SUBSCRIBER_ID
    with the following data:

    SUBSCRIBER_ID - VARCHAR2 (30)
    ---------------------
    BBBB-123456
    AAA-444444
    DD-2222222
    EEEE-888888

    Is there a query that will pull all the SUBSCRIBER_ID that begin with
    each of the PREFIX_CODES? The following query is not valid, but it
    This will give you an idea of what I'm trying to do:

    SELECT SUBSCRIBER_ID
    SUBSCRIBERS
    WHERE AS SUBSCRIBER_ID (SELECT PREFIX_CODE |) » %'
    OF PREFIX_CODES)

    Using the data from above, I would like that the query to return:

    BBBB-123456
    AAA-444444

    Thanks for your help!

    Hello

    Welcome to the forum!

    You were on the right track. To find if a given subscriber corresponds to any prefix_code, you can do an EXISTS subquery:

    SELECT     subscriber_id
FROM     subsribers     s
WHERE     EXISTS ( SELECT  NULL
                  FROM      prefix_codes
           WHERE      s.subscriber_id     LIKE prefix_code || '%'
            )
;

    This will tell you if at least a prefix code. It won't tell you exactly how many, or what they were.
    Your message, I'm guessing that there may be more than one, and you can deduct the subscriber_id itself, then the above query should work for you.

  • The default value based on the field from another table to a custom object

    I'm trying to set the default value to a field in the custom object to the value of a field of account. I tried the syntax 50 ways different and just don't get the case. The label for the account field displays the form of s/n, the integration of the tag is ltDBA_ACCT and it appears in the fx reports area as Account.Text_22.

    The field of custom object that I am triying update is also called s/n, which was originally the required field 'NAME '. The name of the table, account, should it be included? Do I need a function to the field?

    I've updated the external ID using the line with syntex < ID > ID (at least higher ID) so I know that it is possible to define a default value, but s / < n >, < ltDBA_ACCT >, 'account '. "" S/n "and so on are simply not working.

    If anyone knows how to get into what I would be really grateful for the help.

    OK, so if you default a field to the value of another object, you must use the JoinFieldValue function. I think you understand that, based on your original post, but I want to be sure you do.

    Then this won't work by default if the folder is created from the object that you want to join the because a default works in record creation and the ID must be available so that it works correctly. It will not work if you choose the record of the related object after that registration of the custom object is created. You can set the default after, but that does not meet your requirements.

    The syntax of the default are the following: JoinFieldValue (ref_record_type, foreign_key, field_name).

    In your case, ref_record_type is '', foreign_key is [] and field_name is ''. The best way is to determine what is the name of the field to create a new workflow for the account and use the Workflow Rule Condition expression builder to choose your field ("DBA") in the list. The value returned by the expression builder must be placed in the field_name variable in the function JoinFieldValue (minus the parentheses and quotes).

    Give it a shot and let me know how you do.
    Thom

  • Help with the query to return the last possible value

    Can someone please help me to create a query for the situation below?

    Table: TABLEA
    Columns:
    FACID VARCHAR2 (10),
    DEPTID VARCHAR2 (10),
    CHARGENUMBER NUMBER (10)

    I have the following data:

    A, B, 1
    A, B, 2
    C, D, 3
    C, D, 4

    I will return the following:

    A, B, 2
    C, D, 4

    In other words, I would return the last possible CHARGENUMBER for FACID and DEPTID.
    The table has no index, and it is responsible for a worksheet in that order.

    Thank you very much!

    Hello

    If you have a TIMESTAMP column, called entry_dt, you can use a Top - N query like this to find the last x entries.

    WITH  got_rnum  AS
(
     SELECT  my_table.*
     ,     RANK () OVER (ORDER BY entry_dt DESC)     AS rnum
     FROM     my_table
)
SELECT     *     -- or list all columns except rnum
FROM     got_rnum
WHERE     rnum     <= x
;

    It is very common to have a trigger to ensure that columns like entry_dt are met.

    If you have only one statement that inserts with hundreds of lines, they can all have the same entry_dt. (The value of SYSTIMESTAMP is constant throughout a statement, even if it takes a few seconds).
    The above query uses RANK, so if you tell him you want the last 10 entries, it can return more than 10, because it includes all lines with exactly the same entry_dt as the 10th. If you want to exactly 10 rows returned, even if there is a tie for 10th place, then use ROW_NUMBER instead of RANK; the rest of the query is the same.

  • Help create the query

    Hi all

    I have the below requirement.
    Master table:
Product ID      Product Name
1               TV
2               Cellphone
3               Laptop
4               DVD Player

Details table:
Product ID     Spec type     Spec Detail
1               Color          Blue
1               Weight          20
2               Color          Blue
2               Weight          20
3               Color          Blue
3                Weight          25
4               Color          Blue
4               Weight          20
4               Height          10
    I'm looking for a way to identify products with the exact same specifications.

    That is to say, in the example TV and cell phone above has exact specifications.
    So the result of the query must be TV and phone cell phone here.

    Is it possible to do in a query, or we need a sql block to perform this action.

    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Thank you
    Agathya

    Hi agathya,

    We do not know how you want to handle the situation where more than two products have the same specifications, so I extended your sample data slightly to take account of this situation as well:

    SQL> create table products (id,name)
  2  as
  3  select 1, 'TV' from dual union all
  4  select 2, 'Cellphone' from dual union all
  5  select 3, 'Laptop' from dual union all
  6  select 4, 'DVD Player' from dual union all
  7  select 5, 'Radio' from dual union all
  8  select 6, 'VCR' from dual
  9  /

Tabel is aangemaakt.

SQL> create table product_specifications (product_id,spec_type,spec_detail)
  2  as
  3  select 1, 'Color' , 'Blue' from dual union all
  4  select 1, 'Weight', '20'   from dual union all
  5  select 2, 'Color' , 'Blue' from dual union all
  6  select 2, 'Weight', '20'   from dual union all
  7  select 3, 'Color' , 'Blue' from dual union all
  8  select 3, 'Weight', '25'   from dual union all
  9  select 4, 'Color' , 'Blue' from dual union all
 10  select 4, 'Weight', '20'   from dual union all
 11  select 4, 'Height', '10'   from dual union all
 12  select 5, 'Color' , 'Blue' from dual union all
 13  select 5, 'Weight', '20'   from dual union all
 14  select 6, 'Color' , 'Blue' from dual union all
 15  select 6, 'Weight', '20'   from dual union all
 16  select 6, 'Height', '10'   from dual
 17  /

Tabel is aangemaakt.

SQL> select p1.name
  2       , p2.name
  3    from products p1
  4       , products p2
  5       , product_specifications ps1
  6       , product_specifications ps2
  7   where p1.id = ps1.product_id
  8     and p2.id = ps2.product_id
  9     and p1.id < p2.id
 10   group by p1.id
 11       , p1.name
 12       , p2.id
 13       , p2.name
 14  having sqrt(count(*)) =
 15         count(case when ps1.spec_type = ps2.spec_type and ps1.spec_detail = ps2.spec_detail then 1 end)
 16  /

NAME       NAME
---------- ----------
TV         Cellphone
TV         Radio
Cellphone  Radio
DVD Player VCR

4 rijen zijn geselecteerd.

    But why devil you or your specifications product model predecessor like that? You are much more complicated that it should be. And the data type of size and weight should be not the same as those of color. But now they are. And how do limit you the allowed values for the colors? Color, weight and size are characteristic of your products so that they should have been modeled like this.

    See how easily your questions becomes after remodeling it:

    SQL> drop table product_specifications purge
  2  /

Tabel is verwijderd.

SQL> drop table products purge
  2  /

Tabel is verwijderd.

SQL> create table products (id,name,color,weight,height)
  2  as
  3  select 1, 'TV', 'Blue', 20, null from dual union all
  4  select 2, 'Cellphone', 'Blue', 20, null from dual union all
  5  select 3, 'Laptop', 'Blue', 25, null from dual union all
  6  select 4, 'DVD Player', 'Blue', 20, 10 from dual union all
  7  select 5, 'Radio', 'Blue', 20, null from dual union all
  8  select 6, 'VCR', 'Blue', 20, 10 from dual
  9  /

Tabel is aangemaakt.

SQL> select * from products
  2  /

        ID NAME       COLO     WEIGHT     HEIGHT
---------- ---------- ---- ---------- ----------
         1 TV         Blue         20
         2 Cellphone  Blue         20
         3 Laptop     Blue         25
         4 DVD Player Blue         20         10
         5 Radio      Blue         20
         6 VCR        Blue         20         10

6 rijen zijn geselecteerd.

SQL> select p1.name
  2       , p2.name
  3    from products p1
  4       , products p2
  5   where p1.id < p2.id
  6     and ( p1.color = p2.color or (p1.color is null and p2.color is null))
  7     and ( p1.weight = p2.weight or (p1.weight is null and p2.weight is null))
  8     and ( p1.height = p2.height or (p1.height is null and p2.height is null))
  9  /

NAME       NAME
---------- ----------
TV         Cellphone
TV         Radio
Cellphone  Radio
DVD Player VCR

4 rijen zijn geselecteerd.

    I hope this helps.

    Kind regards
    Rob.

  • Delete rows in a table when the columns from two tables match

    Hello

    I have following two tables.

    ===========================================

    create the table empbooth as

    (

    Select 1 empid, 1 double cabin Union all the

    Select option 2, Union 1 double all the

    Select 3, Union 1 double all the

    Select option 4, Union 2 double all the

    Select option 5, 2 double

    );

    create the table attsht as

    (

    Select 1 empid, 240 reg, 0 unpaid all double union

    Select option 2, reg 200, 0 unpaid of all the double union

    Select 3, 240 reg, 0 unpaid all double them union

    Select 4 480 reg, 0 unpaid all double union

    Select 5 240 reg, unpaid double 0

    );

    =================================================

    I want to remove rows from attsht where corresponding booth (which is stored in the empbooth table) is 1.

    The condition is 'where attsht.empid = empbooth.empid and empbooth.booth = 1 '.

    I use oracle 10g.

    Help, please

    delete from attsht where a.empid in (select b.empid from empbooth b where b.booth = 1)

    or

    remove from attsht a

    where exists (select null

    of empbooth b

    where b.booth = 1

    and b.empid = a.empid)

Maybe you are looking for