help sql two queries toload target table

Similar Questions

• Need help combining two SQLs similair in a single

  DB version: 10 gr 2
  
  I need to combine the following two queries into one query and return the following three columns
  
  
  Processed, unprocessed Quantity1 Quantity2, Total cost of Uprocessed
  
  
  
  
  Quantity1 untreated can be determined using

  select t.ITEM, sum(t.QTY)
    from (select cd.ITEM_ID ITEM, cd.ACTL_QTY QTY
            from CONVEY_HDR ch, CURRENT_INVN cd, ALLOC_HDR ah
           where ........
          UNION
          select sd.ITEM_ID ITEM, sd.INVN_QTY QTY
            from shp_dtl pd
          UNION
          Select item_id, inv_qty from another table
      GROUP BY.....
  
  
  ITEM        SUM(T.QTY)
  ---------- ----------
  88JAT                25
  000002395           1
  300108396          27
  000004397           7
  73984290           15

  Quantity2 untreated can be determined using
  
  

  select t.ITEM, sum(t.QTY)
       from (select cd.ITEM_ID ITEM, cd.ACTL_QTY QTY
               from CONVEY_HDR ch, CURRENT_INVN cd, ALLOC_HDR ah
              ...........
      where rownum<6
     group by t.ITEM
     order by t.ITEM;
  
  ITEM        SUM(T.QTY)
  ---------- ----------
  189436171           2
  009438837         160
  000040685          16
  000032410          18

  Total fees unprocessed found using the sum of the quantities for a specific element by above two queries multiplied by
  ITEM_COST for this ARTICLE (which is in the table ITEM_DTL). For each element; ITEM_DTL.item_id = CARTON_dTL.carton_id
  
  Unprocessed total cost = (unprocessed Quantity1 + Quantity2 unprocessed) * ITEM_DTL. ITEM_COST
  
  Note: Unprocessed Quantity2 query looks very similair to the first SQL Union Quantity1 unprocessed, but ah. STAT_CODE < 90 for query Quantity2 unprocessed
  
  Published by: user636669 on January 14, 2009 10:40
  
  Published by: user636669 on January 14, 2009 10:57
  Corrected typo
  
  Published by: user636669 on January 14, 2009 19:07

  Hello

  Put the two queries that you posted in subqueries. You can then use their result sets as if they were tables.

  Do something like this:

  WITH  uq1  AS
  (
      select t.ITEM, sum(t.QTY) AS total
        from (select cd.ITEM_ID ITEM, cd.ACTL_QTY QTY
                from CASE_HDR ch, CASE_DTL cd, ASN_HDR ah
      ... the rest of your first query goes here
  )
  ,     uq2  AS
  (
      select t.ITEM, sum(t.QTY)  AS total
           from (select cd.ITEM_ID ITEM, cd.ACTL_QTY QTY
                   from CASE_HDR ch, CASE_DTL cd, ASN_HDR ah
      ... the rest of your second query goes here
  )
  SELECT  uq1.item
  ,       uq1.total  AS "Unprocessed Quantity1"
  ,       uq2.total  AS "Unprocessed Quantity2"
  ,       (uq1.total + uq2.total) * dtl.item_cost
                     AS "Total Uprocessed Cost"
  FROM    uq1
  JOIN    uq2               ON uq1.item = uq2.item
  JOIN    item_dtl   dtl    ON uq1.item = dtl.item;
  

  If certain elements are in uq1 but not in uq2 (or more), then you will probably want to do outer joins.

  I have no used tables, so I can't test it myself.
  If you need assistance. then after a few examples from each data tables and the results desired from these data.

  Looks like you're doing the same join in each of your original queries.
  You can add an another subquery that makes that join once and then use this subquery in uq1 and uq2 subqueries.

• A target table is in charge of two different sources but the same columns, but a source is one database and another in a flat file.

  We all hope you are doing well.

  I have a business problem to implement in ODI 11 G. It's here. I'm trying to load a target table from two sources that have the same column names. But a source is to the file format and the other is in the Oracle database.

  That's what I think I'll create two mappings in the same interface by using the Union between the sources. But I don't know how the interface would connect to different logical architecture to connect to two different sources.

  Thank you

  SM

  You are on the right track, all in a single interface. Follow these steps

  (1) pull model of your data in the designer of the source file and your table model target to the target pane.

  (2) all relevant columns map

  (3) in the source designer to create a new dataset and choose as the UNION join type (this will create a separate tab in the source designer pane)

  (4) select the new dataset tab in the source designer pane and pull your source oracle table data model in the designer of the source. All columns that are relevant to the target card

  (5) make sure that your staging location is set to a relational technology i.e. in this case the target would be an ideal candidate because it is where the ODI will organize the data from source two files and oracle and perform the UNION before loading to the target

  If you want to watch some pretty screenshots showing the steps above, take a look at http://odiexperts.com/11g-oracle-data-integrator-part-611g-union-minus-intersect/

• Help to combine the two queries with dependencies

  Combining two queries with dependencies:
  First ask: Returns USER_ID that has a type of access to a table with the OWNER (I also shoot the TLA of the USER_ID standard: ' of TLA #)

  Select distinct SUBSTR (DBA_USERS. Username, 2, 3) AS TLA

  DBA_USERS. Username USED_ID

  DBA_TAB_PRIVS. Owner OWNER

  from DBA_USERS

  DBA_ROLE_PRIVS

  DBA_TAB_PRIVS

  where DBA_USERS. Username = DBA_ROLE_PRIVS. Dealer

  and DBA_USERS.default_tablespace not in ('SYSTEM', "SYSAUX")

  and DBA_USERS. Username like would be %'

  and DBA_ROLE_PRIVS. Granted_role = DBA_TAB_PRIVS. Dealer

  and SUBSTR (DBA_USERS. Username, 2, 3) <>DBA_TAB_PRIVS. Owner

  ;

  Example of results (red font used in the last citation):

  TLA USED_ID OWNER

  --- ------------------------------ ------------------------------

  DGTX999 GTX GRR

  DGTX999 GTX ABG

  DGTX999 GTX HTC

  FWS DFWS999 GRR

  OCN DOCN999 GRR

  RHR DRHR999 DAS

  ETM DETM999 DAS

  FWS DFWS995 DAS

  CD DCDS999 DAS

  ABE DABE999 DAS

  
  
  Second request: matches the USER name (same standards as above) and MACHINES (filter PC connections) and the number of connections made of

  Select DBA_USERS. Username

  DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. Machine

  COUNT (*) AS CONN_COUNT

  of DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY

  DBA_USERS

  where DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. User_id = DBA_USERS. User_id

  and DBA_USERS. Username like would be %'

  and DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. Machine not as "WINAD%\%-%".

  Group of DBA_USERS. Username

  DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. Machine

  order by 1

  3 desc;

  Example of results (red font used in the last citation):

  MACHINE CONN_COUNT USERNAME

  --------------- ------------------------- ----------

  DFWS999 home13e0 7557

  DGAM800 vu1246 37

  DGAM999 vu1246 2558

  DABE999 back18cb 4639

  DINL888 home162f 84

  DFWS999 WINDAD\OMHQ58BF 178

  DCDS999 back18cb 788

  DGTX999 home18c8 7

  DGTX999 home13d3 62

  DOCN999 vu1261 44

  DFWS999 back1976 3

  DCDS999 home18c8 173

  DGTX999 home19c9 13

  What I'd like to have (just made two first USER_IDs from the first query) (COL duplicated for each separate owner 1-4).  So 3 machines and 3 owners would result in 9 lines (I could reorganize the collar and use a 'pause'):

  TLA USED_ID MACHINE CONN_COUNT OWNER

  --- ------------------------------ ------------------------- ---------- ------------------------------

  GTX DGTX999 home13d3 62 GRR

  Home18c8 GTX DGTX999 7 GRR

  DGTX999 GTX home19c9 GRR 6

  GTX DGTX999 home13d3 62 ABG

  DGTX999 GTX home18c8 ABG 7

  DGTX999 GTX home19c9 6 GBS

  GTX DGTX999 home13d3 62 CTH

  DGTX999 GTX HTC 7 home18c8

  DGTX999 GTX home19c9 6 HTC

  FWS DFWS999 home13e0 7557 GRR

  FWS DFWS999 WINDAD\OMHQ58BF 178 GRR

  FWS DFWS999 back1976 GRR 3

  
  So it would be logically read: TLA as USER_ID of MACHINE, CONN_COUNT consultation times: OWNER information.

  Thought as only those with the necessary values. Just try this and let me know in the case of all conflicts in the output.

  WITH T1 AS)

  Select distinct SUBSTR (DBA_USERS. Username, 2, 3) AS TLA

  DBA_USERS. Username USED_ID

  DBA_TAB_PRIVS. Owner OWNER

  ROWNUM RN

  from DBA_USERS

  DBA_ROLE_PRIVS

  DBA_TAB_PRIVS

  where DBA_USERS. Username = DBA_ROLE_PRIVS. Dealer

  and DBA_USERS.default_tablespace not in ('SYSTEM', "SYSAUX")

  and DBA_USERS. Username like would be %'

  and DBA_ROLE_PRIVS. Granted_role = DBA_TAB_PRIVS. Dealer

  and SUBSTR (DBA_USERS. Username, 2, 3) <> DBA_TAB_PRIVS. Owner),

  () AS T2

  Select DBA_USERS. Username

  DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. Machine

  COUNT (*) AS CONN_COUNT

  of DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY

  DBA_USERS

  where DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. User_id = DBA_USERS. User_id

  and DBA_USERS. Username like would be %'

  and DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. Machine not as "WINAD%\%-%".

  Group of DBA_USERS. Username

  DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. Machine

  order by 1

  3 desc)

  SELECT T1. TLA

  ,         T1. USED_ID

  ,         T2. MACHINE

  ,         T2. CONN_COUNT

  ,         T1. OWNER

  FROM T1

  T2

  WHERE T1. USED_ID = T2. USER NAME;

• delete all, then insert into the target table, two steps in one transaction?

  Hello
  
  We have the following two steps in one ODI package, it will be managed in a single transaction?
  
  procedure step 1): remove all of the target table.
  interface in step 2): insert data in the source table in the target table.
  
  our problem is that step 2 can take some minutes, and then the target table can temporary unusable for end users who try to access it, I'm good?
  
  Kind regards
  Marijo

  Hello

  It can be managed in a single transaction by selecting IKM as the Append and TRUNCATE/DELETEALL Option command in the FLOW of an interface tab.

  Thanxs
  Malezieux

• How to combine the two queries into a single

  Hi gurus,

  SQL > select * from v version $;

  BANNER

  ----------------------------------------------------------------

  Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production 64-bit

  PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production

  CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production

  AMT for Linux: release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production

  NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production

  SQL >

  I have following two queries. How can I convert these two queries into one with the same result?

  1ST QUARTER

  SELECT id, $vdate, SupplierName, venddate, vid

  THE SELLER

  WHERE processid = 32

  AND venddate is null

  AND vid to (select vid from view_vid where type = 'PDX')

  AND (id, $vdate) not in (select id, $vdate from vkfl_is where task_id = 55)

  AND (id, $vdate) in (select id, vidate from market_data where marketed_date is null)

  AND id not in (select id from location)

  Q2

  SELECT id, $vdate, SupplierName, venddate, vid

  THE SELLER

  WHERE processid = 20

  AND venddate is null

  AND vid to (select vid from view_vid where type = 'PBX')

  AND (id, $vdate) not in (select id, $vdate from vkfl_is where task_id = 40)

  AND (id, $vdate) in (select id, vidate from market_data where region_date is null)

  AND id not in (select id from location)

  I can the UNION queries these two, but is there some way I can write a single query that gives me the same result as above two queries?

  Any help would be much appreciated

  Thanks in advance

  Sorry, it lack

  SELECT id, $vdate, SupplierName, venddate, vid

  THE SELLER

  ProcessID WHERE in (32.20)

  AND venddate is null

  AND vid to (select vid from view_vid where type = case when processid = 32

  then "PDX".

  else "PBX".

  end)

  AND (id, $vdate) not in (select id, $vdate from vkfl_is where task_id = case when processid = 32

  then 55

  40 else

  end)

  AND (id, $vdate) in (select id, vidate from market_data cases where processid = 32)

  then marketed_date

  of other region_date

  end to the null value

  )

  AND id not in (select id from location)

  Concerning

  Etbin

• Any difference between the two queries

  Hello

  Could someone please help me to see if the following two queries return different results?

  Thank you

  Query A

  SELECT A.BATCH_NO,

  A.BU_CODE,

  SUM (A.AMOUNT) AMOUNT

  FROM TABLE_A HAS

  WHERE A.BU_CODE = 20

  AND G_DATE BETWEEN TO_DATE (JANUARY 31, 2013 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "")

  AND TO_DATE (MARCH 31, 2013 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "")

  --

  AND A.BATCH_NO IN (SELECT BATCH_NO

  TABLE_A B1

  WHERE B1. BATCH_NO = A.BATCH_NO

  AND B1. BU_CODE = A.BU_CODE

  AND B1. ' CODE_P = ' 06-01-01-000.

  AND B1. FROM_FLAG = 'FROM '.

  )

  AND A.BATCH_NO IN (SELECT BATCH_NO

  FROM TABLE_A B

  WHERE B.BATCH_NO = A.BATCH_NO

  AND B.BU_CODE = A.BU_CODE

  AND B1.ORG = '10'

  )

  A.BATCH_NO GROUP,

  A.BU_CODE

  ;

  Query B

  SELECT A.BATCH_NO,

  A.BU_CODE,

  SUM (A.AMOUNT) AMOUNT

  FROM TABLE_A HAS

  WHERE A.BU_CODE = 20

  AND G_DATE BETWEEN TO_DATE (JANUARY 31, 2013 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "")

  AND TO_DATE (MARCH 31, 2013 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "")

  --

  AND A.BATCH_NO IN (SELECT BATCH_NO

  TABLE_A B1

  WHERE B1. BATCH_NO = A.BATCH_NO

  AND B1. BU_CODE = A.BU_CODE

  AND B1. ' CODE_P = ' 06-01-01-000.

  AND B1. FROM_FLAG = 'FROM '.

  AND B1.ORG = '10'

  )

  A.BATCH_NO GROUP,

  A.BU_CODE

  ;

  Hello

  These 2 requests are not the same.  Depending on your data, query A, can select more lines as searching for B.

  I do not have access to your table, so I'll give an example of using the table scott.emp.

  The following 2 queries look like your 2 questions:

  SELECT deptno - query A
  work
  sal
  FROM scott.emp m
  WHERE deptno IN ((in English only)
  SELECT sj.deptno
  FROM scott.emp sj
  WHERE sj.deptno = m.deptno
  AND sj.job = 'CLERK '.
  )
  AND (IN) deptno
  SELECT ss.deptno
  FROM scott.emp ss
  WHERE ss.deptno = m.deptno
  AND ss.sal > 1200
  )
  ;

  SELECT deptno - query B
  work
  sal
  FROM scott.emp m
  WHERE deptno IN ((in English only)
  SELECT s.deptno
  FROM scott.emp s
  WHERE s.deptno = m.deptno
  AND s.job = 'CLERK '.
  AND s.sal > 1200
  )
  ;

  The results of A query are all 14 rows in the table, but query B produces only 3 lines of deptno = 10.

  Query A looking for departments who have committed and the departments that have sal > 1200.  If a line in the Department has job = 'CLERK' (regardless of the sal), and another line was sal > 1200 (regardless of the work), while the Department meets both criteria.

  Query B is looking for federal departments who have committed that sal is over 1200.  Two criteria must be met on the same line.

• Create a target table by using the model of the ODI

  Hi all
  
  I am new to ODI. I'm try export table RDBMS for source RDBMS table at target.
  
  If we create the structure of the target in the trg schema table or we can create using the model fit obi by selecting new data store.
  
  Owb loading target tables is created and the data will be loaded.
  
  Pls help me about this.
  
  Thanks in advance.

  Hello
  You can create it in the two ways.if you create using ODI data store, you must select Create table option target in flow during loading of the target.

• MERGE TWO QUERIES...

  Hi all
  
  I have two queries like this...
  
  I want to have a single query of the two tables satisfying condition where that show all RELATIONSHIP, FILED_NAME, P2. ATTRIBUTE, P3. ATTRIBUTE, DESCRIPTION of the AREA, the two SOURCE tables P3 AND P2.
  
  Appreciate your help.
  
  Thank you/kumar
  
  Published by: kumar73 on May 28, 2010 09:49

  Hope you have understood my requirement.

  Ah, I see now that I misread your question (it must be a 'weekend-thing' ;)).

  Try something like this:

  select p3.relation
  ,      p3.field_name
  ,      p2.attribute
  ,      p3.attribute
  ,      p3.value_description
  ,      p3.source
  from ( select relation, field_name, attribute, field_description, source
         from p3i2009q2_variable_info p3
        where relation not in
              ('CHAI', 'ITAB', 'ITB2', 'ITB3', 'MINI', 'NOTE', 'MINC', 'FINI',
               'FTIM', 'FWTG', 'FMLY', 'FMIS', 'FSUM', 'MEMB', 'FINC', 'FASO')
          and (substr(field_name, -2) in
              ('X1', 'X2', 'X3', 'X4', 'X5', 'X0', 'XA', 'XB', 'XM', 'XP', 'CM', 'MT') or
              substr(field_name, -1) in ('X') or substr(field_name, 1) in ('J'))
          and (attribute like 'NUM%' or attribute = '-')
       ) p3
  ,    ( select relation, field_name, attribute, field_description, source
         from p2i2009m04_variable_info p2
        where relation not in
              ('CHAI', 'ITAB', 'ITB2', 'ITB3', 'MINI', 'NOTE', 'MINC', 'FINI',
               'FTIM', 'FWTG', 'FMLY', 'FMIS', 'FSUM', 'MEMB', 'FINC', 'FASO')
          and (substr(field_name, -2) in
              ('X1', 'X2', 'X3', 'X4', 'X5', 'X0', 'XA', 'XB', 'XM', 'XP', 'CM', 'MT') or
              substr(field_name, -1) in ('X') or substr(field_name, 1) in ('J'))
          and (attribute like 'NUM%' or attribute = '-')
       ) p2
  where p3.relation = p2.relation
  order by relation;
  

  You may need to adjust my untested example, for example you might need an outer join and/or add predicates more as you wish.

• Why this two queries are not same

  Hi all
  
  Can you please explain this fundamental thing. Why this two queries are different. (10.2.0.3 Solaris Sparc 64)
  

  create table x1(a1 varchar2(10),a2 number, a3 varchar2(10));
  create table x2(b1 varchar2(10),b2 number, b3 varchar2(10));
  insert into x1 values('X101',1,'XX1');
  insert into x1 values('X101',1,'XX1');
  insert into x1 values('X102',1,'XX2');
  insert into x1 values('X103',2,'XX3');
  insert into x1 values('X104',2,'XX4');
  insert into x1 values('X105',3,'XX5');
  commit;
  
  insert into x2 values('X101',1,'X21');
  insert into x2 values('X101',1,'X21');
  insert into x2 values('X102',1,'X22');
  insert into x2 values('X103',2,'X23');
  insert into x2 values('X104',2,'X24');
  commit;
  
  WITH xx AS (select b1,b2 from x2 where b1 IS NULL)
   select x1.* from x1 ,  xx
    where x1.a1 = xx.b1(+) and  x1.a2 = xx.b2(+) ;
   
  A1                 A2 A3
  ---------- ---------- ----------
  X105                3 XX5
  X104                2 XX4
  X102                1 XX2
  X103                2 XX3
  X101                1 XX1
  X101                1 XX1
   
  6 rows selected
   
  select x1.* from x1, x2 where x1.a1 = x2.b1(+)
      and x1.a2 = x2.b2(+)  and x2.b1 IS NULL;
   
  A1                 A2 A3
  ---------- ---------- ----------
  X105                3 XX5
   
  select b1,b2 from x2 where b1 IS NULL;
   
  B1                 B2
  ---------- ----------
   

  Thank you!
  NA not (sentence of) think of this.
  + (it's one of those things that I really need of don't forget do not forget ;)) +)

  hoek&XE> select x1.*
    2  from   x1
    3  where not exists ( select null
    4                     from   x2
    5                     where  x1.a1 = x2.b1
    6                     and    x1.a2 = x2.b2
    7                    );
  
  A1                 A2 A3
  ---------- ---------- ----------
  X105                3 XX5
  
  1 rij is geselecteerd.
  
  Uitvoeringspan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  Plan hash value: 816925353
  
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation          | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     5 |   100 |     5  (20)| 00:00:01 |
  |*  1 |  HASH JOIN ANTI    |      |     5 |   100 |     5  (20)| 00:00:01 |
  |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| X1   |     6 |    72 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  |   3 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| X2   |     5 |    40 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
  ---------------------------------------------------
  
     1 - access("X1"."A1"="X2"."B1" AND "X1"."A2"="X2"."B2")
  
  Statistics
  ----------------------------------------------------------
            1  recursive calls
            0  db block gets
            6  consistent gets
            0  physical reads
            0  redo size
          518  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
          384  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
            2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
            0  sorts (memory)
            0  sorts (disk)
            1  rows processed
  

• Try to combine the two queries

  I have two queries of tables in which I combine and summarize the results in a single value. Could someone let me know what it is that im missing here? Thank you
  
  Deanna
  
  Output current:
  
  SUM
  5
  10
  
  The output I want to see:
  SUM
  15
  
  
  My paintings:
  
  TABLE 'CHART '.
  CASE_NUMBER - VARCHAR2
  PER_INV_FATALITIES - NUMBER (5.0)
  ASSIGNEDDATE_CHART - DATE
  
  TABLE "VEHICLES".
  CASE_NUMBER - VARCHAR2
  VEHICLE_FATALITY #-NUMBER (5.0)
  
  
  
  Current SQL query:
  

  SELECT SUM(ct) FROM (
  SELECT SUM(vehicle_fatality#) ct FROM vehicles inner join chart
  on vehicles.case_number=chart.case_number
  WHERE vehicle_fatality#>=1 AND 
  ASSIGNEDDATE_CHART BETWEEN TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE,'RR'),'DD/MON/RR')AND SYSDATE)
  union all
  SELECT SUM(ct) FROM (
  SELECT SUM(per_inv_fatalities) ct FROM chart
  WHERE PER_INV_FATALITIES>=1 AND 
  ASSIGNEDDATE_CHART BETWEEN TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE,'RR'),'DD/MON/RR')AND SYSDATE);

  Hello

  Instead of:

  SELECT  SUM (ct)
  FROM     (query_a)
  UNION ALL
  SELECT  SUM (ct)
  FROM     (query_b)
  ;
  

  do

  SELECT     SUM (ct)
  FROM     (          query_a
       UNION ALL     query_b
       )
  ;
  

  SUM without GROUP BY will produce a line.
  If you do a UNION ALL of two queries of this type operation, you will get two rows.
  The UNION ALL first, then make a single SUM on the combined results.

• compare the fields of two queries

  I need to compare the fields of two queries.
  
  I went through many articles to asktom help operator less. but I'm not convinced by this method.
  
  Comaprisons are for about 10 fields.
  
  So I'm planing to do using sliders and nested loops. performance can be a problem.
  
  Please give your suggestions or solutions.

  OK, using the data you provided, I get this:

  with map_test_fac as (select 100 idid, 789 ifid, 300 edid, 741 efid from dual union all
                        select 100 idid, 123 ifid, 300 edid, 963 efid from dual union all
                        select 100 idid, 456 ifid, 300 edid, 258 efid from dual),
           test_fac as (select 741 facid, 'ETY' type, 'EUR' ccy, 'Ext' src, 300 did from dual union all
                        select 789 facid, 'WE' type, 'EUR' ccy, 'Int' src, 100 did from dual union all
                        select 123 facid, 'VPR' type, 'EUR' ccy, 'Int' src, 100 did from dual union all
                        select 456 facid, 'ETY' type, 'USD' ccy, 'Int' src, 100 did from dual union all
                        select 963 facid, 'WE' type, 'EUR' ccy, 'Ext' src, 300 did from dual union all
                        select 258 facid, 'VPR' type, 'EUR' ccy, 'Ext' src, 300 did from dual)
  -- end of mimicking your data: USE SQL below:
  select tfi.facid int_facid,
         tfi.type int_type,
         tfi.ccy int_ccy,
         tfi.src int_src,
         tfi.did int_did,
         tfe.facid ext_facid,
         tfe.type ext_type,
         tfe.ccy ext_ccy,
         tfe.src ext_src,
         tfe.did ext_did
  from   test_fac tfi,
         test_fac tfe,
         map_test_fac mtf
  where  mtf.ifid = tfi.facid
  and    mtf.efid = tfe.facid
  and    mtf.idid = tfi.did
  and    mtf.edid = tfe.did
  and    (tfi.type != tfe.type
          or tfi.ccy != tfe.ccy)
  
   INT_FACID INT INT INT    INT_DID  EXT_FACID EXT EXT EXT    EXT_DID
  ---------- --- --- --- ---------- ---------- --- --- --- ----------
         789 WE  EUR Int        100        741 ETY EUR Ext        300
         123 VPR EUR Int        100        963 WE  EUR Ext        300
         456 ETY USD Int        100        258 VPR EUR Ext        300
  

  However, I think that your mapping data is incorrect, so with keys of information:

  with map_test_fac as (select 100 idid, 789 ifid, 300 edid, 963 efid from dual union all
                        select 100 idid, 123 ifid, 300 edid, 258 efid from dual union all
                        select 100 idid, 456 ifid, 300 edid, 741 efid from dual),
           test_fac as (select 741 facid, 'ETY' type, 'EUR' ccy, 'Ext' src, 300 did from dual union all
                        select 789 facid, 'WE' type, 'EUR' ccy, 'Int' src, 100 did from dual union all
                        select 123 facid, 'VPR' type, 'EUR' ccy, 'Int' src, 100 did from dual union all
                        select 456 facid, 'ETY' type, 'USD' ccy, 'Int' src, 100 did from dual union all
                        select 963 facid, 'WE' type, 'EUR' ccy, 'Ext' src, 300 did from dual union all
                        select 258 facid, 'VPR' type, 'EUR' ccy, 'Ext' src, 300 did from dual)
  -- end of mimicking your data: USE SQL below:
  select tfi.facid int_facid,
         tfi.type int_type,
         tfi.ccy int_ccy,
         tfi.src int_src,
         tfi.did int_did,
         tfe.facid ext_facid,
         tfe.type ext_type,
         tfe.ccy ext_ccy,
         tfe.src ext_src,
         tfe.did ext_did
  from   test_fac tfi,
         test_fac tfe,
         map_test_fac mtf
  where  mtf.ifid = tfi.facid
  and    mtf.efid = tfe.facid
  and    mtf.idid = tfi.did
  and    mtf.edid = tfe.did
  and    (tfi.type != tfe.type
          or tfi.ccy != tfe.ccy)
  
   INT_FACID INT INT INT    INT_DID  EXT_FACID EXT EXT EXT    EXT_DID
  ---------- --- --- --- ---------- ---------- --- --- --- ----------
         456 ETY USD Int        100        741 ETY EUR Ext        300
  

  That's more like what you're looking for?

• ODI 12 c: IKM for differential insert and update with a sequence in the target table

  Hello

  I have a map where I fill in a column of my target table using a database sequence. Now my mapping is supposed to load the target gradually table. So I need a revenge for update and incremental insert. Now with this differential IKM it compares all the columns to match all colmuns line to understand, it should be an insert or update. Now, the following code shows that when the ROW_WID is loaded with a sequence of database.

  If NOT EXISTS

  (select 1 from W_LOV_D T

  where T.ROW_WID = S.ROW_WID

  and ((T.CREATED_BY = S.CREATED_BY) or (T.CREATED_BY IS NULL and S.CREATED_BY IS NULL)) and

  ....

  ....

  < the rest of the comparison of columns >

  )

  So when running ODI returns following error

  Caused by: java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-00904: "S". "" ROW_WID ": invalid identifier

  Please suggest if there is no other IKM I should use or if there is another way around it without changing the code IKM...

  Hi Marc,

  Thanks for your reply.

  I had solved it. The incremental update process inserts all rows from the source table to I$ table that exists in the target table. It does so by the where sql such as mentioned in my questions as

  WHERE THERE is NOT ( . COLUMNS = . COLUMNS)

  Now in the incremental update IKM Oracle to retrieve all the columns it uses the substitution with parameter as TABLE TARGET. Due to this column sequence will in the comparison and the request fails. When I used the IKM SQL incremental update it used INTEGRATION TABLE as parameter table to pick up the columns, as I'd mentioned in the target sequence is run, so it does not get the sequence column.

  Simple answer: to solve this, use incremental update of the SQL IKM.

  Thank you

  SM

• The logged data is not loaded in the target table in cdc-compatible?

  Hello

  I tried with cdc-simple concept on single table.

  I had loaded, journaled table (only changed records) inserted in the simple target in cdc table. Its working fine.

  When I work on cdc-consistent and logged data are not loaded in the target table

  For this, I used the data model, it has 3 data stores. log the without option of data, its works very well.

  When I am trying to load tables logged in the target table in interface, its running fine.

  To do this, I chose "logged data only.

  Although I have not changed the records in the target table. target table is empty after the executed insterface.

  

  

  

  

  I chose the real option of insertion in ikm. But the logged data that is not inserted in the target table.

  Please help me.

  Thankin advacnce,

  A.Kavya.

  Hello

  You must EXPAND WINDOW and LOCK SUBSCRIBERS before consuming the CDC data:

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E14571_01/integrate.1111/e12643/data_capture.htm#ODIDG283

  Subsequently, you unlock Subscriber and purge the log.

  Better to put a package to automate the whole thing.

• Failed to truncate the target table while programming the interface in ODI

  Hi Expertise,

  I developed a scenario in an interface, where I planned keeping the option Truncate as false, right there the data is been going to target without any problems, but when I changed the status of truncate to TRUE, the interface is been run, but the array is not get truncated, rather the data's been loading again to target. (when running manually, the target table is been truncated perfectly) but not in programming.

  Can someone help me in this problem.

  Thank you

  Shakur.

  Have you regenerate the scenario in question since you changed the option Truncate. If you have not the regular job must still run the old code