I hit the limit of sql 32 k?  My query is only 25274 characters in length

Similar Questions

• When I hit the download, I do not get an option run, only to save it.

  I have Windows XP 32-bit. I want to download the correct version of Thunderbird. Step 2 says download instructions choose run when the download window appears, but I only a save option. Why? and what do I do?

  Save the Setup program on your disk, for example on your desktop and run it from there.

  Make sure you only download Thunderbird https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/.

• Out of the queue of SQL * Plus for Excel

  I'm out of the queue of SQL * Plus for Excel. The code I use is down. I want that all white space to carve when I open the updated file waiting in Excel. How can I ensure this?
  
  I was reading on the SET TRIM command, but it says that it does not affect the output queued. (http://ss64.com/ora/syntax-sqlplus-set.html)
  
  Is there a way to NOT display whitespace at the beginning and the end of a column in SQL * more? In other words, if I shoot a single column of a record, and a data element is only 3 characters in length, I want to be also 3 characters instead of extending over 40 characters across the width of the column.
  
  
  The column for your troubleshooting information
  IDNUMBER is NUMBER (12)
  FIRST is VARCHAR2 (40)
  The LAST is VARCHAR2 (60)
  
  
  Code
  SET LINESIZE 100
  SET PAGESIZE 0
  SET MARKUP HTML PREFORMAT ON
  set colsep,
  coil c:\prospects.csv
  Select '' perspective ID"', '" First"',""finally" "from dual;
  Select to_char (p.idnumber), p.first, prospect_view p.last p where idnumber = 164515;
  spool off

  DataHandle wrote:
  I'm out of the queue of SQL * Plus for Excel. The code I use is down. I want that all white space to carve when I open the updated file waiting in Excel. How can I ensure this?

  I was reading on the SET TRIM command, but it says that it does not affect the output queued. (http://ss64.com/ora/syntax-sqlplus-set.html)

  TRIM affects the expressions in your SELECT clause. It has nothing to do with the padding of SQL * Plus adds to align the columns upwards.

  Is there a way to NOT display whitespace at the beginning and the end of a column in SQL * more? In other words, if I shoot a single column of a record, and a data element is only 3 characters in length, I want to be also 3 characters instead of extending over 40 characters across the width of the column.

  Here's a way to make the main request:

  SELECT        TO_CHAR (idnumber)
  || ',' ||  first
  || ',' ||  last
  FROM           prospect_view
  WHERE        idnumber     = 164515
  ;
  

  This will include spaces only if they occur in first or last. Depending on your data and your requriements, you may need to use the FILLING (first) instead of the first, and/or TRIM (finally) instead of the last.

  Using this technique, it does not matter what is COLSEP: the query produces a single column.

  Use the SQL * more order

  SET  TRIMSPOOL ON
  

  to keep SQL * more add space after this single column.

• Characters not visible (caused by hitting the bar space or TAB in PL/SQL developer tool) causing slow running query? and database with low performance?

  Hi all

  I need your help to get this issue resolved its urgent and I'm not able to get to the conclusion. Here is my scenario, I'm getting slow query runs because of some non-visible characters that are copied with the application of the PL/SQL developer tool. Please find below attached screenshot: Oracle_Issue

  

  Note: This non-visible characters are caused when we write the query then us hit the SPACEBAR or press TAB PL/SQL developer tool

  I use the developer tool PL/SQL to write or test the query. Now I take this request copy paste in my application of the company (who takes this query connects to Oracle or any source of data base, catch data and produce PDF reports for customers).

  Now, my client is the Oracle user when I write and you run this query by the PL/SQL Developer, it works fine, but when I paste in my Inbox feature request (reporting system) and run it, it runs slower and jams to the customer database. Now after a little research I found that when I copy the query directly from PL/SQL developer at my request, he copy some characters not visible (introduced when we press SPACE or TAB in PL/SQL developer tool when writing query) with the request, then I copy this query again to my box of the application Notepad and delete these non-visible characters. Now, after removing the non-visible characters again once I copy backup question in my application and run the query, it works normally. Please find below attached screenshot: Oracle_Issue 2

  

  So I think that the cause of slow performance is due to some INVISIBLE CHARACTERS present in the query.

  My application uses SQL server 2008-2012 at the backend to store data from different sources.

  Character set used: SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS

  
  

  To write and test queries: PL/SQL developer tool

  My Client use Oracle 11 g

  Character set used: Normal character: NLS_CHARACTER: AL16UTF16

  National Characeter: NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTER: WE8WIN1521

  I just wanted to know the blocking process to the top of the database and the characters not visible how affecting slow running query of query database.

  Please let me know if I'm missing something or you need more information on this issue.

  Thanks in advance,

  HP

  Simple answer. No.

  Spaces and line breaks do not change the execution plan created. Does not plan to run slower or faster.

• NTFS cluster size size of the partition of the limit?

  Is there a limit on partition size maximum for partitions with cluster size less than 4 KB? For example, if I don't want to use the cluster of 2 KB size, can I use it on, say, the 80 GB partition? Or file system corruption occur?

  25/08/2010 04:54, achlebek wrote:

  Is there a size limit of maximum score for partitions with clusters
  size less than 4 KB? For example, if I don't want to use the cluster of 2 KB
  size, can I use it on, say, the 80 GB partition? Or it will happen
  corruption of the file system?

  In theory the maximum NTFS volume size is 4294967295 clusters, unlese you use disks GPT (which cannot use Windows XP 32-bit) you will hit the limitations of MBR (partition table) of 2 terabytes, until you hit the maximum NTFS volume size.  The MBR partition table to attack 4294967295 sectors effectively with disks being arranged in 512-byte sectors MBR disks are limited to a maximum size of 2 TB.

  Why the hell would you want to use a non standard 2K cluster size?  I think that it is simply and just a bad idea and that you should allow the operating system to format the drive to use size by default NTFS clusters.

  John

• Using bulk collect into with assistance from the limit to avoid the TEMP tablespace error run out?

  Hi all

  I want to know if using bulk collect into limit will help to avoid the TEMP tablespace error run out.

  We use Oracle 11 g R1.

  I am assigned to a task of creating journal facilitated for all tables in a query of the APEX.

  I create procedures to execute some sql statements to create a DEC (Create table select), and then fires on these tables.

  We have about three tables with more than 26 million records.

  It seems very well running until we reached a table with more than 15 million record, we got an error says that Miss tablespace TEMP.

  I googled on this topic and retrieve the tips:

  Use NO LOG

  Parallel use

  BULK COLLECT INTO limited

  However, the questions for those above usually short-term memory rather than running out of TEMPORARY tablespace.

  I'm just a junior developer and does not have dealed with table more than 10 million documents at a time like this before.

  The database support is outsourced. If we try to keep it as minimal contact with the DBA as possible. My Manager asked me to find a solution without asking the administrator to extend the TEMP tablespace.

  I wrote a few BULK COLLECT INTO to insert about 300,000 like once on the development environment. It seems.

  But the code works only against a 000 4000 table of records. I am trying to add more data into the Test table, but yet again, we lack the tablespace on DEV (this time, it's a step a TEMP data)

  I'll give it a go against the table of 26 million records on the Production of this weekend. I just want to know if it is worth trying.

  Thanks for reading this.

  Ann

  I really need check that you did not have the sizes of huge line (like several K by rank), they are not too bad at all, which is good!

  A good rule of thumb to maximize the amount of limit clause, is to see how much memory you can afford to consume in the PGA (to avoid the number of calls to the extraction and forall section and therefore the context switches) and adjust the limit to be as close to that amount as possible.

  Use the routines below to check at what threshold value would be better suited for your system because it depends on your memory allocation and CPU consumption.  Flexibility, based on your limits of PGA, as lines of length vary, but this method will get a good order of magnitude.

  CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE show_pga_memory (context_in IN VARCHAR2 DEFAULT NULL)

  IS

  l_memory NUMBER;

  BEGIN

  SELECT st. VALUE

  IN l_memory

  SYS.v_$ session se, SYS.v_$ sesstat st, SYS.v_$ statname nm

  WHERE se.audsid = USERENV ('SESSIONID')

  AND st.statistic # nm.statistic = #.

  AND themselves. SID = st. SID

  AND nm.NAME = 'pga session in memory. "

  Dbms_output.put_line (CASE

  WHEN context_in IS NULL

  THEN NULL

  ELSE context_in | ' - '

  END

  || 'Used in the session PGA memory ='

  || To_char (l_memory)

  );

  END show_pga_memory;

  DECLARE

  PROCEDURE fetch_all_rows (limit_in IN PLS_INTEGER)

  IS

  CURSOR source_cur

  IS

  SELECT *.

  FROM YOUR_TABLE;

  TYPE source_aat IS TABLE OF source_cur % ROWTYPE

  INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;

  l_source source_aat;

  l_start PLS_INTEGER;

  l_end PLS_INTEGER;

  BEGIN

  DBMS_SESSION.free_unused_user_memory;

  show_pga_memory (limit_in |) "- BEFORE"); "."

  l_start: = DBMS_UTILITY.get_cpu_time;

  OPEN source_cur.

  LOOP

  EXTRACTION source_cur

  LOOSE COLLECTION l_source LIMITED limit_in;

  WHEN l_source EXIT. COUNT = 0;

  END LOOP;

  CLOSE Source_cur;

  l_end: = DBMS_UTILITY.get_cpu_time;

  Dbms_output.put_line (' elapsed time CPU for limit of ')

  || limit_in

  || ' = '

  || To_char (l_end - l_start)

  );

  show_pga_memory (limit_in |) "- AFTER");

  END fetch_all_rows;

  BEGIN

  fetch_all_rows (20000);

  fetch_all_rows (40000);

  fetch_all_rows (60000);

  fetch_all_rows (80000);

  fetch_all_rows (100000);

  fetch_all_rows (150000);

  fetch_all_rows (250000);

  -etc.

  END;

• Immediate change in the limit of characters of the text field?

  I have a PDF form that I try to do more foolproof. When a user enters his credit card number, I want to check the first two numbers to see which kind of card it is (Visa/MasterCard/American Express) and select the radio suitable for them, as well as limit the number of digits that can be entered in the credit card number field. I found it for the most part, but it seems that change the limit of characters (charLimit) in the card number field is not actually take place until focus leaves the field, then comes. Here is the code I have so far, in the property Custom hits Script on the tab Format for this field:

  event.rc = /^\d*$/.test(event.change);
  
  
  var thisField = event.target;
  var amexTest = /^3[47]/;
  var mcTest = /^5[1-5]/;
  var visaTest = /^4/;
  var firstTwo = event.value.slice(0,2);
  var ccButtons = getField("Credit Card Buttons");
  if (amexTest.test(firstTwo)) {
      thisField.charLimit = 15;
      ccButtons.value = "AMEX";
  } else if (mcTest.test(firstTwo)) {
      thisField.charLimit = 16;
      ccButtons.value = "Master Card";
  } else if (visaTest.test(firstTwo)) {
      thisField.charLimit = 19;
      ccButtons.value = "Visa";
  }
  

  It seems that my code pasted a bit cut off near the end for a reason, but I think that it is enough to show what I want to happen. Because this script is executed at every keystroke, and then after the first two characters are typed, I want to limit the number of characters for what is appropriate for this type of card. This should help a little to what people mistyped their number. However, as I said, the change isn't actually place until focus leaves and enters this area.

  What can I do to make the immediate change?

  I don't think that you can not do it like that, but you don't need to. As you are already using a script of the event in the sequence of keys, you can check the length of the text and then reject the strikes if it is too long.

• Collect in bulk in stores less number of lines in the collection when you use the LIMIT?

  I wrote the following PL SQL anonymous block. However, the line dbms_output.put_line (total_tckt_col. FINALLY gives me) output as 366 (DBMS_OUTPUT is Developer SQL) which is correct when there is no limit. If the limit is set at 100 in the FETCH statement then dbms_output.put_line (total_tckt_col. Give me FINALLY) 66. What I'm doing wrong here?

  
  

  DECLARE

   CURSOR cur_total_tckt 
   is
   select  t.ticket_id ticket_id, t.created_date created_date, t.created_by created_by, t.ticket_status ticket_status,
  t.last_changed last_changed, h.created_date closed_date
   from n01.cc_ticket_info t
   inner join n01.cc_ticket_status_history h
   on (t.ticket_id = h.ticket_id)
   where t.last_changed >= '6/28/2012 17:28:59' and t.last_changed < (sysdate + interval '1' day);

  type total_tckt_colcn
   is
   TABLE OF cur_total_tckt%rowtype;
  total_tckt_col total_tckt_colcn;
  total_coach_col total_tckt_colcn;
   begin

  total_tckt_col  := total_tckt_colcn ();
  total_coach_col := total_tckt_colcn ();
   OPEN cur_total_tckt;
  loop
   fetch cur_total_tckt bulk collect into total_tckt_col;
-- fetch cur_total_tckt bulk collect into total_tckt_col limit 100;
   EXIT
   WHEN (cur_total_tckt%NOTFOUND);
   END LOOP ;
   CLOSE cur_total_tckt;  

  dbms_output.put_line(total_tckt_col.LAST); 

   FOR i IN total_tckt_col.first..total_tckt_col.last
  LOOP

  dbms_output.put_line(i);

   END LOOP;
   end;

  Jocelyn says:

  This is a modified version of your code on the standard table EMP in schema scott.

  Have you tested it? All you have is last batch has 4 rows. But you print outsite the loop. That way if the last batch is incomplete (within boundary lines) last batch does not have your loop. Suppose you want to print the enames:

  DECLARE

  CURSOR cur_total_tckt

  IS

  Select ename

  EMP; -I have a total of 14 records in this table

  type total_tckt_colcn

  is

  TABLE OF THE cur_total_tckt % rowtype;

  total_tckt_col total_tckt_colcn;

  BEGIN

  total_tckt_col: = total_tckt_colcn ();

  OPEN cur_total_tckt.

  LOOP

  Cur_total_tckt fetch bulk collect within the limits of the total_tckt_col 5;

  EXIT WHEN cur_total_tckt % NOTFOUND;

  FOR v_i IN 1.total_tckt_col.count LOOP

  dbms_output.put_line (total_tckt_col (v_i) .ename);

  END LOOP;

  END LOOP;

  CLOSE Cur_total_tckt;

  END;

  /

  SMITH
  ALLEN
  WARD
  JONES
  MARTIN
  BLAKE
  CLARK
  SCOTT
  KING
  TURNER

  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

  SQL >

  As you can see, it didn't print the last batch. Why? Because NOTFOUND is set to true if the number of lines that you asked to fetch was not recovered. This last batch has 4 rows while the claim code to get 5. Therefore, NOTFOUND has the value true and outputs code before dealing with this last batch. Therefore, repeat the treatment code again once outside the loop:

  DECLARE

  CURSOR cur_total_tckt

  IS

  Select ename

  EMP; -I have a total of 14 records in this table

  type total_tckt_colcn

  is

  TABLE OF THE cur_total_tckt % rowtype;

  total_tckt_col total_tckt_colcn;

  BEGIN

  total_tckt_col: = total_tckt_colcn ();

  OPEN cur_total_tckt.

  LOOP

  Cur_total_tckt fetch bulk collect within the limits of the total_tckt_col 5;

  EXIT WHEN cur_total_tckt % NOTFOUND;

  FOR v_i IN 1.total_tckt_col.count LOOP

  dbms_output.put_line (total_tckt_col (v_i) .ename);

  END LOOP;

  END LOOP;

  FOR v_i IN 1.total_tckt_col.count LOOP

  dbms_output.put_line (total_tckt_col (v_i) .ename);

  END LOOP;

  CLOSE Cur_total_tckt;

  END;

  /

  SMITH
  ALLEN
  WARD
  JONES
  MARTIN
  BLAKE
  CLARK
  SCOTT
  KING
  TURNER
  ADAMS
  JAMES
  FORD
  MILLER

  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

  SQL >

  But you have to accept to repeat that twice the processing code is no better solution. When you use BULK COLLECT LIMIT we should not leave NOTFOUND but rather by collection.count = 0:

  DECLARE

  CURSOR cur_total_tckt

  IS

  Select ename

  EMP; -I have a total of 14 records in this table

  type total_tckt_colcn

  is

  TABLE OF THE cur_total_tckt % rowtype;

  total_tckt_col total_tckt_colcn;

  BEGIN

  total_tckt_col: = total_tckt_colcn ();

  OPEN cur_total_tckt.

  LOOP

  Cur_total_tckt fetch bulk collect within the limits of total_tckt_col 6;

  WHEN OUTPUT total_tckt_col.count = 0;

  FOR v_i IN 1.total_tckt_col.count LOOP

  dbms_output.put_line (total_tckt_col (v_i) .ename);

  END LOOP;

  END LOOP;

  CLOSE Cur_total_tckt;

  END;

  /

  SMITH
  ALLEN
  WARD
  JONES
  MARTIN
  BLAKE
  CLARK
  SCOTT
  KING
  TURNER
  ADAMS
  JAMES
  FORD
  MILLER

  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

  SQL >

  SY.

• How to increase the limit the max column pivot in BIEE 11 G?

  Hi Experts,
  
  How to increase the limit the max column pivot in BIEE 11 G?
  
  When the number of columns exceeds 256 in pivot mode, it generates the error message as below:
  
  Exceeded the configured maximum number of allowed output prompts, sections, the rows or columns.
  Error details
  Error codes: IRVLJWTA:OI2DL65P
  Geographical area: saw.httpserver.processrequest, saw.rpc.server.responder, saw.rpc.server, saw.rpc.server.handleConnection, saw.rpc.server.dispatch, saw.threadpool.socketrpcserver, saw.threads
  Publ. SQL: 13678 ~ vid1ptgt0v5ubh39gesnauuhl6
  
  For example:
  ----------------Day
  Country - 20120101 - 20120102-... 20121231
  China - 10000 - 20000-...

  Try increasing the lines Max Instanceconfig.xml

  Path:-Middleware\instances\instance1\bifoundation\OracleBIPresentationServices\instanceconfig. XML

  
  
  
  300
  1000
  500
  25
  30
  
  
  

  Try to add in the configuration file and restart the services.

  Mark as correct if it is useful.

  Thank you.

• Interactive report returns misleading data because of the limit ROWNUM

  Hi, we have relied on the internal decision-making interactive reports widespread in our society, and they have been very popular. However, a user has found an inconsistency of data when sorting to a report because the ROWNUM limit: APXWS_MAX_ROW_CNT is applied before the user requested the ORDER BY clause. We run Apex version 3.2.0.00.27 on a 10.2.0.4 database.
  
  Request quotes from our application IR returns citing custom and the number of lines by default is 100 (and is editable by the user). The user wants to see the most recent citations, so he chose the column heading "Date of creation" and simply applied a descending filter. The last quote returned was dated last week. However, if he has applied an additional filter of "date of creation last week", he sees today date and for most of the current quotation lines.
  
  When I ran on its IR application debugging, I see that the ROWNUM limit is applied first, followed in ORDER BY. This means that the database retrieves the x first lines that match the provided parameters and then orders the result set. However, this isn't what the user meant, he wanted the first lines of an ordered set.
  
  This is the result of the query to debug (deleted community because it is long):
  

  select 
         "QUOTE_NUMBER",
         "CUSTOMER",
         "CUST_CONTACT",
         "QUOTE_STATUS",
         "TOTAL_PRICE",
         "TOTAL_WEIGHT",
         "WHSE",
         "SHIP_DATE",
         "PO_NUMBER",
         "ORACLE_REFERENCE",
         "INSIDE_SALESREP",
         "OUTSIDE_SALESREP",
         "CREATION_DATE",
         "ID",
         "ORA_CUST_ID",
         "CUST_CONTACT_ID",
         count(*) over () as apxws_row_cnt
   from (
  select  *  from (
  SELECT 
    kh.id,
    kh.ora_cust_id,
    kh.quote_number quote_number ,
    kh.cust_contact_id,
    k2_customers_pkg.get_contact(cust_contact_id) cust_contact ,
    k2_customers_pkg.get_cust_name(kh.ora_cust_id)customer,
    k2_customers_pkg.get_cust_number(ora_cust_id)
  
   ( ......... more sql goes here )
  
  AND k2_customers_pkg.get_outside_salesrep_number(kh.ora_site_id)||'%' LIKE :P64_OUTSIDE_SALES||'%'
  AND kh.whse_code like :P64_WAREHOUSES||'%'
  AND ((1=
      CASE WHEN :P64_ITEM_ID IS NULL THEN
          1
      ELSE
          (SELECT 1
             FROM k2_quote_lines kl
             JOIN k2_ingredients ki
               ON ki.quote_line_id=kl.id
            WHERE (1=1
              AND kh.id=kl.quote_id
              AND ki.ora_item_id=:P64_ITEM_ID AND ROWNUM=1))
      END)
      OR 1=(
          SELECT 1 FROM k2_quote_lines kl WHERE kl.quote_id=kh.id AND kl.part_id=:P64_ITEM_ID AND ROWNUM=1
      ))
  )  r
  ) r where rownum <= to_number(:APXWS_MAX_ROW_CNT) 
   order by "CREATION_DATE" DESC,"QUOTE_NUMBER" DESC

  However, what the user must have the ORDER BY applied first, then the limit. I realize performance can be affected, but users are now alarmed that they cannot trust these reports. I'm tempted to connect a SR with Oracle on it.
  
  Any ideas on that? What is this problem fixed in 4.0?
  
  Thank you, Moritz Wolf

  Hi Wolf,

  I don't think that the problem is with the number of rows displayed. I think that it is a function of the attribute of the ratio "number of lines". And as assistance at the level of the elements of this attribute indicates "defines the maximum number of rows in the query. Note that this attribute impact on performance. Get fewer lines can improve performance and get thousands of lines can adversely affect performance. »

  You can set the maximum number of rows to an artificially high - greater number that we'll never be your total number of lines. But this does not alter the fact that the ORDER BY still apply on the outer part of your query.

  Joel

• Bulk collect treats all lines not containing the LIMIT clause.

  Hi all
  
  I was referring the Oracle Site for COLLECTION in BULK.
  
  http://www.Oracle.com/technology/oramag/Oracle/08-Mar/o28plsql.html
  
  In the following code, I found and I ran the same.
  
  I just want to know why motor Pl - SQL is not processing or recital 27 last lines when I use % NOTFOUND cursot attribute.
  
  
  

  PROCEDURE process_all_rows_foi_test (p_limit PLS_INTEGER DEFAULT 100)
  IS
     CURSOR c1
     IS
        SELECT *
          FROM all_objects
         WHERE ROWNUM <= 227;
  
     TYPE foi_rec IS TABLE OF c1%ROWTYPE
        INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
  
     v_foi_rec   foi_rec;
     v_number    NUMBER  := 1;
  BEGIN
     OPEN c1;
  
     LOOP
        FETCH c1
        BULK COLLECT INTO v_foi_rec LIMIT p_limit;
  
        EXIT WHEN v_foi_rec.COUNT = 0;--------EXIT WHEN c1%NOTFOUND;--->Here is the issue
        DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (v_number);
        v_number := v_number + 1;
     END LOOP;
  
     CLOSE c1;
  END;

  Please guide me on this.
  
  Thank you
  Arun

  % NOTFOUND will have the value TRUE when it gets below the limit

  (it is documented)

  But your workaround works fine

  SQL> declare
    2     CURSOR c1
    3     IS
    4        SELECT *
    5          FROM all_objects
    6         WHERE ROWNUM <= 227;
    7
    8     TYPE foi_rec IS TABLE OF c1%ROWTYPE
    9        INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
   10
   11     v_foi_rec   foi_rec;
   12     v_number    NUMBER  := 1;
   13  BEGIN
   14     OPEN c1;
   15
   16     LOOP
   17        FETCH c1
   18        BULK COLLECT INTO v_foi_rec LIMIT 100; --p_limit;
   19
   20        EXIT WHEN v_foi_rec.COUNT = 0;--------EXIT WHEN c1%NOTFOUND;--->Here is the issue
   21        DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (v_foi_rec.count);
   22        v_number := v_number + 1;
   23     END LOOP;
   24
   25     CLOSE c1;
   26  END;
   27  /
  100
  100
  27
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> 
  

  Another option would be to place the EXIT right before your END LOOP;

• Unable to connect to the database in SQL 2005

  Tried setting up of connection string to the DB on the server, but DW doesn't connect. Other applications such as Visual Studio and Microsoft Expression DO work and have no problem using the same connection string we use in DW CS3. When we hit the 'Test' to test the connection, we have several different scenarios. 1) 1) _mmServerScript error 2) [DBNETLIB] Error invalid connection and 3.) no error, just of the cycles, then has an empty DB.
  
  We got it works once before with another server, but now we're in trouble. Connection to the DB works fine with other programs, but not with DW CS3 (Mac and PC) - really want to understand it for Mac.
  
  We have sent a support ticket to the administrator of the server that says that everything should be fine on their end.
  
  NOTE: Our test server is identical to our remote server.

  FINALLY! -After-hours hammering on this issue, I finally got it solved.

  When you specify a data source, apparently I need a reference to that SQL server is used. So... instead of just {server name} try something like these:

  Data source = {server name} \SQLEXPRESS
  Data source = {server name} \SQL
  Data source = \SQL2k5 {server name} - that worked for me.

  credit
  http://www.jaredprins.com/blog/?p=111

  Thanks anyway - Detective Conan!

• WARNING: could not set the limit of asynch I/O

  Each night database generation of trace with WARNING below
  Anyone know what this means?
  
  WARNING: could not set the limit asynch I/O to 252 for SQL direct I/O. It is set to 200
  
  
  Oracle Version: 11.1.0.7
  AIX 5.3

  This is the bug number, you must place it in the bugs database.
  Search for metalink notes is easy (as well that I mentioned) and then click bug.

• Problems with the LIMIT in BULK FETCH clause

  Oracle 9i
  =======
  
  I am using this piece of code for insert/update records in a table (replaced by a SELECT INTO in the following example to test). I want to do in pieces since I can't do it at once (this causes an error snapshot too old).
  
  DECLARE
  Typn TYPE IS TABLE OF NUMBER INDEX OF directory;
  TYPE typv IS TABLE OF VARCHAR (1000) INDEX directory.
  
  collpn typv;
  collsi typn;
  collpi typn;
  collaa typn;
  collaay typn;
  
  CURSOR C IS
  SELECT dates period_id d;
  St timestamp;
  number of TMPN;
  TCOL VARCHAR2 (1000);
  BEGIN
  St: = sysdate;
  TCOL: = 'a ';
  TMPN: = 0;
  OPEN C;
  LOOP
  FETCH C BULK COLLECT INTO collaay LIMIT 10; -remove the LIMIT clause to avoid the error
  WHEN THE EXIT %C NOTFOUND;
  BEGIN
  dbms_output.put_line (collaay. (COUNT);
  FORALL i IN collaay. FIRST... collaay. FINALLY SAVE THE EXCEPTIONS
  SELECT collaay (i) from tcol
  CR
  WHERE processed_period_id = collaay (i);
  EXCEPTION
  WHILE OTHERS THEN
  BECAUSE me IN 1..SQL%BULK_EXCEPTIONS. COUNTING LOOP
  dbms_output.put_line (tmpn |': ' |) TCOL ||': ' ||': ' || SQL % BULK_EXCEPTIONS (i). ERROR_INDEX |': ' | SQL % BULK_EXCEPTIONS (i). ERROR_CODE);
  END LOOP;
  END;
  END LOOP;
  dbms_output.put_line (sysdate - st);
  END;
  
  
  Any help would be welcome!

  What line gives error ORA-01403 no data found ?

  Exception WHEN OTHERS might be a problem

  EXCEPTION
      WHEN OTHERS THEN
          FOR i IN 1..SQL%BULK_EXCEPTIONS.COUNT LOOP
  

  You start looking at exceptions in bulk without knowing what the error was raised. It would be best to check explicitly for ORA-24381 as in This example in the documentation.

  Also to move the OUTPUT WHEN the end of the loop.

• "You have reached the limit for the reservations authorized by customer.

  I got this error, whatever i use different apple ID. and also another telephone number of her present on ireserve. But if I try to use another type of government identification. This works. I don't know why the apple system can keep to see my id personal Government reach the limit and it should be fine clear every day. I try to call hong kong apple support. but they said they don't have solution and any part can help with my problem. It is quite interesting that they suggested me to use the information for other people to do the ireserve. can anyone help?

  I'm really confused by your question

  You have reached too much supply of iPhone on iReserve and get an error when you try to use a different number of phone or Apple ID, telling you that you have booked too much. So you try to book using a most other Hong Kong Government issued IDS, and it works

  I'm confused on what you need help with