I'm doing this right? loss of quality?

Similar Questions

• My clips have a yellow line on the mounting sequence. Does this affect my video quality output if I don't give?

  I use Adobe CS 6 to modify and use Sony NX 3 to record. Whenever I import my clips. It has a yellow line on the timeline sequence, even when I make a new clip in the sequence... My question is, does this affect my video quality output if I did not have the yellow line? Please someone help me

  Evergreen Hi,

  No, this will not affect your video output if you don't return out.

  Concerning

  Dorin

• Several workflow mask - am I doing this right?

  Hey guys,.

  I currently have a piece of film that I want to be "revealed" by the use of several ink spot. Mask MOV using inverse Luma Mattes.

  The only way I knew how to do is duplicate show the film again and again with another part being hidden so that it is progressive. I can't imagine that this is the best way to do it though.

  What do you guys suggest?

  Build yourself a demo that contains multiple copies of your movies of Inkblot. Set up transitions so that you get a spot of ink animated to your liking. Use the demo as a matte for your videos. EZ as pie...

• I'm doing this right

  I try to display the data of m on a graph of quiver to 4000ms. Sounds good?

  Here is a very simple example.

• Loss of quality of image while reducing size

  Hello

  IM new to adobe illustrator, im starting an online store for custom product photo and I want to use adobe illustrator to make it ready made models so simply place clients photos inside

  My problem is that I have a card of 10 x 15 model and when I wanted to put a picture, I had to reduce the size of it and it was a huge loss of quality

  what im doing wrong?

  THX

  What happens when you select 'continuous '?  This could be an indicator that you can disable by selecting "do not display".  You can save as > PDF and use Reader to print.  I don't see why the driver would not work or allow you to print.  What happens if you have loaded the PPD in the print dialog box high?

• Loss of quality when sharing

  I've recently updated to Windows Movie Maker for first Elements 8 and when I burned my project, I noticed a significant loss of quality.  The source media is pretty poor, I use a Panasonic VDR-D160 DVD from camcorder mini (Yes it's a nightmare do total import images), and when I import images is a. VOB file.  The stats for the. I work with VOB files are photos of 704 x 576 which goes to 25 frames per second.  The flow is 9558 kbit/s and the total flow is 9814 Kbps.

  The first project that I did is very simple, with minimal editing and without effect.  However, when I burn it to a DVD or a DVD file it modifies the image and 720 x 576 and reduces the data rate and bitrate 7464 Kbps 7656 kbit/s respectively.  This creates an obvious pixelation of the image, especially for the parts of the video that move and can be seen on TV in lower resolution.  Sharing/editing the video, how to keep the same quality as the original?  I have been through the help, and due to my lack of understanding of the elements of the first, I was not able to determine if it's just a matter of changing the settings.

  Thank you!

  Unfortunately, you start with a material that has already been compressed heavily to the format/CODEC MPEG - 2. Then you are editing and a Scaled upward (the DVD spec for PAL) out and then re-compressed in MPEG-2. It is a triple whammie. Because the pre does not have "smart Rendering", what you see is what you get.

  A better choice for the limited edition, basically just cut the material, would be a program that "smart," where all the material, which is not changed, except to remove parts of it, would NOT be converted a second time in MPEG-2. I think that some of the products Sony Vegas, but there are others. If you Google "smart rendering", you will see several programs that have this. I would choose those.

  You will always have the question of the scale, unless you allow your more completely than the electric material specific to be surrounded by black. If evolve you in editing software, even with a smart rendering, it must then be transcoded into MPEG-2 all over again.

  With images, the choices are very limited.

  Good luck and sorry for the bad news.

  Hunt

• My wife has an i5 to 2.3 GHz MacBook Pro early 2011 and it worked like a slug.  Ran disk utility and verified that the disk needs repair using recovery HD.  What does this lead and what is the risk of losing all the data is there?

  My wife has an i5 to 2.3 GHz MacBook Pro early 2011 and it worked like a slug.  Ran disk utility and verified that the disk needs repair using recovery HD.  What does this lead and what is the risk of losing all the data is there?

  Even if it is very slow, you must make a return upwards before the race "repair disk". The risk of data loss is minimal, but do it anyway: Save and run to repair the disk.

  As for what it implies - most of the time nothing more than simply sitting and waiting to do his thing.

• Keep small size without loss of quality over far during re-registration edited JPG

  Hi all

  I have a bunch of pictures of a photographer I need to put a credit. They are all very light (~ 50 k) as they have been saved with JPG compression to only about 900 x 600px.

  My problem is that when I run the action to add the credit, the file is saved as a JPG file but the only way to achieve a similar weight is to set the compression level 2, resulting in a massive loss of quality. With a quality to 12 files increase around 200 k! Is it possible that I can keep the size of the original (or similar) file even if I am actually starting with a new image by editing? The photo credit is added on the edge, not bunk.

  Thank you

  Carpet

  Hi mast

  50 KB for a 900 x 600 pixels image is on the small side and suggests either a high-compression JPG or even save for Web has been used before they came for you.  200 KB is a file size reasonable for a good quality JPG of this size.  It's one of those situations "it is what it is."   Degree of activity are the images?  I'm guessing that you realize that images of high frequency with a lot of details and small blocks of different color, will not compress nearly as well as something like a little bird in a blue sky, so the specific images, you work on will of course affect the size of the file.

  You can get the original files in an uncompressed format?

  The file size is critical?  that is, this is for the use of the web, or what?

  At the present stage, there is no solution that will maintain the quality and the size of the file.

• whenever I try to download or preview and the image, I gives me the message "licensing for this image are no longer available" Why am I doing this?

  whenever I try to download or preview and the image, I gives me the message "licensing for this image are no longer available" Why am I doing this?

  He was going on with all the images. Using chrome, I disconnected and then reconnected and still had the same problem. I have signed in using firefox and had no problem. I bought 3 images of the last week with the help of chrome and downloaded successfully, the problem seems to happen after that. Right now I use firefox for preview images, I can't use chrome. I have not yet tried to make an additional purchase.

• Best way to edit a JPG file in Photoshop while minimizing loss of quality?

  I want to change a lot of pictures of the camera (captured in JPG format) to correct (and sometimes framing and other) exposure issues, but want to reduce to a minimum of loss of quality when I re - save the file. It is preferable to open each image in Camera Raw, make the adjustments, then use 'Save the Image' of the screen of Camera Raw to save my changes? I noticed that this results in a smaller file than the original (for example 1.95 Mb vs 3.75 MB), but wanted to make sure I was using the optimal method for opening/editing/backup to avoid losing too much image quality.

  I think that if you open a Jpg file in camera raw and that through bridge, just the metadata are saved, the image is not recompressed. So what would be the best way to make changes

• Loss of quality when scaling down

  I have a Camtaisa screen capture video which is 1738 x 1188 (Fig 1). I wanted to reduce the video in AE CS6 to fit a little better in a 720 p timeline so that I can make a few simple dishes throughout the image. However, when I've scaled down (75%) the image loses a ton of details and gets pretty sweet (photo 2). I think it would get more net - this seems completely contrary to intuition for me and I tried several options, including continuous rasterization and make 3d layer and scaling but no joy on either. Any ideas on how to put the image down so that it fills several of the model 720 without losing sharpness of details? I'm not zoom, I repeat... I'm not zoom - so this isn't the issue.

  <-sharp<-soft

  Come to know that he was actually replacing the PP timeline with a model of EI that results in the loss of quality. CNTRL-I put in the PP chronology in AE kept them more clear.

• I could place an image in a document BCTI without loss of quality

  Could I place an image inside a BCTI document without loss of quality?

  Review:

  The only thing in this document is the proxy, not the entire chart.

  Bob

• How to proper resize images and videos when running without loss of quality?

  Hi guys. I need a little help here.

  I built a flash site, in which I want to resize a movie to the scene. I do it by keeping the proportion, so I just resize the width and then I resize the consequence of the height to the width of new but keeping the proportion.

  The problem is that my film looks like he "pixeled".

  I found a site on which the stage is resized dynamically with the movie and the background images without any of their loss of quality. So far, I knew that resize pictures or videos in flash for the creation or the runtime environment produces results pixeled.

  This is the site: http://kampanjeweb.apt.no/jotun/romforrom/. Can someone tell me how they do without quality loss? Just make the browser in windowed mode and resize the margins to see the effect.

  Thank you.

  Hello, Venian.

  On the video, you can try setting the smoothing of the flash.media.Video on TRUE property. This should keep a quality, but you can do nothing if the video has a bad quality. You need a great video.

  On the images, you you need to redraw the image whenever you resize. To achieve this, use a combination of Bitmap, BitmapData and Matrix classes. No doubt, just call again. Here's a simple example:

  var scale:Number = .5;
  var highQualitySourceImage:Bitmap = ...your image...;
  var scaleMatrix:Matrix = new Matrix();
       scaleMatrix.scale(scale, scale);
  
  var bitmapData:BitmapData = new BitmapData( scale*highQualitySourceImage.width, scale*highQualitySourceImage.height);
       bitmapData.draw(highQualitySourceImage, scaleMatrix);
  
  var finalBitmap:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bitmapData);
  
  addChild( finalBitmap );
  

  See you soon,.

  CaioToOn!

• 62/4MEM/40000000: 0X84321b98 what does this error message mean?

  62/4MEM/40000000: 0X84321b98 what does this error message mean?

  It of a memory error, what are you are having problems.

• I bought an iphone6s from Lithuania, EU. At the back of the box, it is printed "Aproved for use in all countries of the EU". Does this mean that I can't use it in Asia?

  I bought an iphone6s from Lithuania, EU. At the back of the box, it is printed "Aproved for use in all countries of the EU". Does this mean that I can't use it in Asia?

  It does not mean that you cannot use it in Asia. It cannot be repaired in the European Union, however, and may not work with LTE networks in other parts of the world.