Incompatibility of County to join condition

Similar Questions

• CASE statement in a join condition

  
  Hello

  I'm stuck in this part of the code, where I use CASES in a join condition. I work in Teradata, so I can't use "DECODE".

  LEFT JOIN V610413. TEAM_ASSIGNMENTS your

  -C.firm_id = your. FirmId

  ONE BOX WHEN your. FirmId = c.firm_id THEN your. FirmId = c.firm_id

  WHEN your. FirmId <>c.firm_id THEN your. FirmId = 'no value '.

  END

  AND c.stateId = ta.stateId

  Please advice

  LEFT JOIN V610413. TEAM_ASSIGNMENTS your

  We'RE your. FirmId = CASE WHEN your. FirmId = c.firm_id THEN c.firm_id

  WHEN your. FirmId <> c.firm_id THEN 'no value '.

  END

  AND c.stateId = ta.stateId

• OLAP cube - complex join condition

  Hi Experts,
  
  I requires a complex join between the dimension and cube.
  
  Requirement goes like this-
  
  We have a dimension to the date level-
  January 1, 2011
  January 2, 2011
  ...
  .. and so on.
  
  The fact table is not a matching surrogate key, but it has valid_from_date and valid_to_date that are stamps.
  
  I need to join these two to reach the condition readings - where dim.date between trunc (valid_from_date) and trunc (valid_to_date).
  
  Is it possible/feasible? Enjoyed your responses.
  
  Best regards, Marion

  You should be able to set a condition like this in the field "Join Condition" of the mapping pane cube in AWM. You would need to qualify table names to be something like this

  dim_table.date between trunc(fact_table.valid_from_date) and trunc(fact_table.valid_to_date).
  

  The only restriction to this approach is that you will not be able to partition on the time dimension for this cube due to the complexity of the condition.

  As an alternative, you can define a SQL view that joined your fact table in your time dimension table using the same condition. You map the cube on this point of view, in which case the restriction on partitioning goes.

• Join condition of cube and other mapping missing mapping

  Hi David,
  
  I have a strange problem... After the creation of cube mapping tables defning and physical objects joins and the change of my mapping intermittently disappears... Not being able to trace what's happening. Is this a known bug or nothing is done correctly?
  
  Enjoy your previous answer.
  
  Thank you very much
  Paiva

  A "mapping" is a term of olap product management which means that the cube is not mapped to the level the fact sheet. For example, suppose you have tables like this

  CREATE TABLE SALES_FACT
  (
    DAY_OF_SALE DATE,
    PRODUCT_ID NUMBER,
    UNITS NUMBER,
    COST NUMBER
  )
  
  CREATE TABLE TIME
  (
    DAY DATE,
    MONTH NUMBER,
    QUARTER NUMBER,
    YEAR NUMBER
  )
  

  Suppose you want to analyze the data only at the level of the MONTH and more. In this case, you must set a time of hierarchy which includes levels MONTHS->->-> ALL_TIME YEAR QUARTER and you would need to define a join condition between SALES_FACT and TIME of the form

  SALES_FACT.DAY_OF_SALE = TIME.DAY
  

  This is sometimes called a "mapping" because it maps data in the AW to a higher level than what is stored in the fact (for example, the MONTHS instead of DAYS).

• try to find the join condition

  Hello
  Does anyone know what table in the working repository stores the join interface conditions?
  
  
  
  Thanks in advance
  REDA

  Raj,

  You can reach SNP_TXT, SNP_POP_CLAUSE and SNP_POP for the join conditions.

  Select sp.pop_name, snp_pop sp, spc snp_pop_clause st snp_txt st.txt
  where SP. I_POP = SPC. I_POP
  and MS. POP_NAME = "YOUR_INTERFACE_NAME".
  and SPC. I_TXT_SQL = ST. I_TXT

  See if that helps you.

• Join does not work for NULL values on the join condition

  Hello
  
  I have the following problem.
  
  SQL > select * from a;
  
  X Y
  ---------- --------------------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  
  SQL > select * from b;
  
  A:
  ---------- --------------------
  1
  2
  
  
  
  SQL > select f.x, f.y, s.b in f, s b
  2 where f.x = s.b (+);
  X Y B
  ---------- -------------------- ----------
  1 1
  2 2
  4
  3
  
  
  
  
  SQL > select f.x, f.y, s.b in f, s b
  2 where f.x = s.b (+)
  3 and f.y = s.y;
  
  no selected line
  
  
  So now if I include a join condition more where null = null situation arises, it's working now.
  Just tell her not to treat (1 and null) (1 and null) are the same.
  What is the solution. This is an expected behavior.
  
  
  Thank you
  Pramod Garre

  Pramod salvation,

  Another way to use the outer join is,

  Select f.x, f.y, s.b
  of a, f, s b
  where f.x = s.b (+)
  and nvl(f.y,0) = nvl (s.y (+), 0);

  Hope this will help you.

  Thank you
  Amit

• Error when you try to validate the Join Condition

  In a map, I include a Carpenter and set the join condition. By clicking on the button post, I got the following error: "an error occurred during validation of the expression. Bad expression return type. »
  
  At first, we thought it was a problem when you create a new map. However, we returned to the existing mappings already validated successfully and each join now returns this error OWB. This occurs for each installed user with OWB. Mapping validate successfully in the end, but the join itself will not be validated during development.
  
  We currently use customer 10.2.0.4.36 OWB and OWB 10.2.0.4.0 repository. The latest patch is causing this problem? A way to solve this problem?
  
  Thank you
  Jennifer

  It's a bug, not a feature:

   09/17/08 03:26 pm
   Version & machine info: ========================
  OWB Client/OS: OWB 10.2.0.4.36/Windows
  OWB Design Repository Version: 10.2.0.4
  Runtime Repository Server Platform/Version: Windows XP/10.2.0.4.36
  Oracle Database/OS : 10.2.0.3/Windows XP
  SOURCE & TARGET on the same machine or different machine ? yes
  SOURCE database version/OS: 10.2.0.3
  TARGET database version/OS: 10.2.0.3 .
  Problem Description ======================== .
  Filter and Join Mapping Expressions always fail the Validation Check with the  following dialogue: "An error occured during expression validation. Bad expression return type". It does not matter what the expression is. . This is a new bug in 10.2.0.4. The same exppressions validate successfully in  10.2.0.3 . The code generates and deploys successfully after this message. . . . Reproducible Case (For All bugs) ================================= . 1)START OWB Design and connect  2)Import the uploaded OWB 10.2.0.4 MDL file: expression_validate_bug.mdl  3)OPEN the Project TESTCASE 4)OPEN The Oracle Module EXPRESSION_VALIDATE_BUG 5)OPEN the mapping EXPRESSION_VALIDATE_ERROR 8)Highlight the Filter 9)Open the Filter Condition Doialogue Box. 10)Select the validate button. 11)Observe error.
  
  BugNo: 7417869 vom 17.09.08
  

  Kind regards
  Detlef

• Difference in using the join condition

  Hello

  Can someone please explain the difference between below towing queries using joins.

  First, I used additional where condition on the statement.

  Select count (*) from table1 t1

  Join external table2 t2 on t1.c1 = t2.c2 = 'ZZZ' and t2.c1 left

  In the second I used it in where condition.

  Select count (*) from table1 t1

  T1.C1 = t2.c1 left outer join table2 t2

  where t2.c2 = 'ZZZ'

  Although, in both cases using the Iam Left outer join that I get different results. Someone please you suggest on this?

  Thanks in advance

  In the first case, Oracle selects a row in the DEPT table and looking for lines in the EMP table for the same service as employees in the DEPT table and job MANAGER. If it does not find these lines it still selects lines of the DEPT table joined with the line of the EMP table where all column values are NULL. That's why first query returns with NULL ename OPERATIONS Department. Second query selects a row in the DEPT table and research lines in the EMP table employees in the same Department in Dept. Similarly it OPERATIONS Department joins with ename and use NULL NULL. But the second query is the WHERE clause is applied after the tables are joined. So now we are looking for JOB = 'MANAGER' in the already joined tables and of course will not select row to the Department of OPERATIONS. In other words, second request denies the need for external since join together there is no external attached lines will always be NULL job.

  SY.

• join condition

  Hi masters.

  I have 4 tables... I need to join properly... I joined like that... Please let me know... is this correct or not?

  SELECT

  SEPARATE

  A.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER Employee_Number,

  Contact_Employee_Number NULL,

  A.last_name Last_Name,

  A.first_name name,

  A.TITLE title,

  A.NATIONAL_IDENTIFIER National_Identifier,

  A.DATE_OF_BIRTH Birth_Date,

  A.SEX gender,

  fn_ret_R12_lov('Lookup-TITLE',B.CONTACT_TYPE) type_contact,

  Relationship of NULL,

  Relationship_From NULL,

  Relationship_To NULL,

  fn_ret_R12_lov ("search-CONTACT_TYPES', A.MIDDLE_NAMES ') Middle_Names,.

  fn_ret_R12_lov('Lookup-CONTACT',B.PRIMARY_CONTACT_FLAG) Primary_Contact,

  B.RLTD_PER_RSDS_W_DSGNTR_FLAG Shared_Residence,

  B.BENEFICIARY_FLAG beneficiary,

  Dependent on B.DEPENDENT_FLAG,

  B.PERSONAL_FLAG Personal_Relationship,

  C.DATE_FROM Address_Date_From,

  C.DATE_TO Address_Date_To,

  C.STYLE mandatory,

  Mandatory C.ADDRESS_TYPE

  C.PRIMARY_FLAG,

  C.ADDRESS_LINE1 Ligne_adresse_1,

  C.ADDRESS_LINE2 Ligne_adresse_2,

  fn_ret_R12_lov('Lookup-ADDRESS_TYPE',C.ADDRESS_LINE3) Address_Line_3,

  City C.REGION_1

  County of C.REGION_2,

  C.COUNTRY country,

  C.POSTAL_CODE Post_Code,

  D.DATE_FROM Phone1_Date_From,

  fn_ret_R12_lov('Lookup-GB_COUNTY',D.DATE_TO) Phone1_Date_To,

  fn_ret_R12_lov('Lookup-PQP_US_COUNTRY_TRANSLATE',D.PHONE_TYPE) Phone1_Type,

  D.PHONE_NUMBER Phone1_Number,

  D.DATE_FROM Phone2_Date_From,

  D.DATE_TO Phone2_Date_To,

  fn_ret_R12_lov('Lookup-D'.PHONE_TYPE) Phone2_Type,

  D.PHONE_NUMBER Phone2_Number,

  D.DATE_FROM Phone3_Date_From,

  D.DATE_TO Phone3_Date_To,

  fn_ret_R12_lov('Lookup-D'.PHONE_TYPE) Phone3_Type,

  D.PHONE_NUMBER Phone3_Number,

  Emergency_Flag NULL

  Of

  PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F, A.

  B PER_CONTACT_RELATIONSHIPS,

  PER_ADDRESSES C.

  PER_PHONES D

  WHERE

  A.PERSON_ID = B.PERSON_ID

  AND A.PERSON_ID = C.PERSON_ID

  AND A.PARTY_ID = D.PARTY_ID;

  Please find below the table desc... Please notify.

  / / DESC

  -------

  DESC PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
  ------------------------------------------
  Name of Type Null

  ----------------------------------------------------
  PERSON_ID NOT NULL NUMBER (10)

  EFFECTIVE_START_DATE NOT NULL DATE
  EFFECTIVE_END_DATE NOT NULL DATE
  BUSINESS_GROUP_ID NOT NULL NUMBER (15)

  PERSON_TYPE_ID NOT NULL NUMBER (15)
  EMPLOYEE_NUMBER VARCHAR2 (30)

  EXPENSE_CHECK_SEND_TO_ADDRESS VARCHAR2 (30)

  PARTY_ID NUMBER (15)
  

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  DESC PER_CONTACT_RELATIONSHIPS
  -------------------------------

  Name of Type Null
  ---------------------------------------------
  CONTACT_RELATIONSHIP_ID NOT NULL NUMBER (15)
  BUSINESS_GROUP_ID NOT NULL NUMBER (15)
  PERSON_ID NOT NULL NUMBER (10)
  CONTACT_PERSON_ID NOT NULL NUMBER (10)
  TYPE_CONTACT NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (30)

  PARTY_ID NUMBER (15)

  CONT_INFORMATION_CATEGORY VARCHAR2 (30)

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  PER_ADDRESSES DESC;
  ----------------------
  Name of Type Null
  ADDRESS_ID NOT NULL NUMBER (15)
  BUSINESS_GROUP_ID NUMBER (15)
  PERSON_ID NUMBER (10)
  OBJECT_VERSION_NUMBER NOT NULL NUMBER (9)
  PARTY_ID NUMBER (15)
  

  
  PER_phones DESC;
  ------------------
  Name of Type Null
  -------------------------------------------
  PHONE_ID NOT NULL NUMBER (15)
  DATE_FROM NOT NULL DATE
  DATE OF DATE_TO
  PHONE_TYPE NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (30)
  PHONE_NUMBER NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (60)
  PARENT_ID NUMBER (15)
  PARENT_TABLE VARCHAR2 (30)
  ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY VARCHAR2 (30)

  PARTY_ID NUMBER (15)
  VARCHAR2 (30) OF VALIDITY

  This section:

  Of

  PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F, A.

  B PER_CONTACT_RELATIONSHIPS,

  PER_ADDRESSES C.

  PER_PHONES D

  WHERE

  A.PERSON_ID = B.PERSON_ID

  AND A.PERSON_ID = C.PERSON_ID

  AND A.PARTY_ID = D.PARTY_ID;

  Changes to something like this:

  Of

  PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F, A.

  B PER_CONTACT_RELATIONSHIPS,

  PER_ADDRESSES C.

  PER_PHONES D

  WHERE

  A.PERSON_ID = B.PERSON_ID

  AND A.PERSON_ID = C.PERSON_ID

  AND A.PARTY_ID = D.PARTY_ID(+);

  You can also use standard ANSI joins... (but they may get a little more complicated sometimes)

• Join conditional

  Hello
  I need to write a select with a join parole, similar to the following:
  

  select ...
  from table1 a
    join table2 b on l.id= b.prod_id
    join table3 c on c.tip in case
                     when <some_value> in ('RESPINSA', 'ANULAT', 'ANULATA') then (select cod from tipuri_mesaj 
                                                                                                                  where stadiu_trimitere in ('RESPINSA', 'ANULAT', 'ANULATA')
                                                                                                              )
                    else -- here I need c.tip "=" <a_value> , not "in"
                                     

  Is it possible to do? If the first when is true, it must search by using "c.tip (...)", otherwise the condition should be "c.tip =...". »
  
  Thank you!

  Hello

  I still don't see examples of data or expected results, then I will use the tables in the scott schema.
  Looks like you are trying to do something like this:

  SELECT       e.ename
  ,       e.job
  ,        e.deptno     AS e_deptno
  ,       d.deptno     AS d_deptno
  ,       d.dname
  FROM       scott.emp   e
  JOIN       scott.dept  d   ON   (    d.dname  IN ('ACCOUNTING', 'FIRBOLIG')
                                AND  'X' = (
                                           SELECT  dummy
                                FROM    dual
                                        )
                        )
                   OR   (    d.dname  NOT IN ('ACCOUNTING', 'FIRBOLIG')
                        AND  d.deptno = e.deptno
                        )
  WHERE       e.ename   < 'J'      -- Just to reduce quantity.  Acutally says "less than 'J'".  See note below
  ;
  

  Output:

  ENAME      JOB         E_DEPTNO   D_DEPTNO DNAME
  ---------- --------- ---------- ---------- --------------
  ALLEN      SALESMAN          30         10 ACCOUNTING
  BLAKE      MANAGER           30         10 ACCOUNTING
  CLARK      MANAGER           10         10 ACCOUNTING
  ADAMS      CLERK             20         10 ACCOUNTING
  FORD       ANALYST           20         10 ACCOUNTING
  ADAMS      CLERK             20         20 RESEARCH
  FORD       ANALYST           20         20 RESEARCH
  ALLEN      SALESMAN          30         30 SALES
  BLAKE      MANAGER           30         30 SALES
  

  As you can see, when dname = 'ACCOUNTING', the subquery on dual is performed, and, since this condition is TRUE, all 5 scott.emp ranks are supposed to match, regardless of their deptnos. When dname is not "ACCOUNTING", then lines are considered to match ony if the deptnos are the same.

  Published by: Frank Kulash, 19 April 2013 09:24

  This site does not display all of my request.
  The WHERE clause is supposed to be

  WHERE the e.ename < 'J '.

• Need help with the JOIN condition

  I have two tables tb1 and tb2. They join on two columns, namely, plan_name and activity_name. I must, however, ensure the following conditions by joining:
  
  1. pick up all the records that link between tb1 and tb2.
  
  2. If the tb1.plan_name is "Activity Adhoc" and then choose the lines that converge with tb2. Also pick up lines that do not join with tb2 where plan_name = 'Ad hoc activity'. For example:
  TB1 have 2 folders with plan_name Adhoc Acitivity
  plan_name activity_name
  Adhoc activity A1
  Adhoc activity A2
  TB2 has 1 plug with plan_name activity Adhoc
  plan_name activity_name
  Adhoc activity A1
  
  then the two records of tb1 should be taken. in other Assembly documents where plan_name <>"Adhoc Acitivity" should also be taken

  with tb1 as
  (
  select 'Adhoc Activity' plan_name,'A1' activity_name from dual union all
  select 'Adhoc Activity' plan_name,'A2' activity_name from dual union all
  select 'another Activity' plan_name,'A2' activity_name from  dual union all
  select 'Some another Activity' plan_name,'A2' activity_name from dual
  ),
  tb2 as
  (
  select 'Adhoc Activity' plan_name,'A1' activity_name from  dual union all
  --select 'Adhoc Activity' plan_name,'A2' activity_name dual union all
  select 'another Activity' plan_name,'A2' activity_name from  dual --union all
  --select 'Some another Activity' plan_name,'A2' activity_name dual
  )
  select *
  from(
     select a.plan_name a_plan_name,b.plan_name b_plan_name
     from tb1 a,tb2 b
     where a.plan_name = b.plan_name(+)
     and a.activity_name = b.activity_name(+)
       )
  where (a_plan_name = 'Adhoc Activity'  or b_plan_name is not null);
  
  A_PLAN_NAME           B_PLAN_NAME
  --------------------- ----------------
  Adhoc Activity        Adhoc Activity
  another Activity      another Activity
  Adhoc Activity                         
  

  Published by: JAC on November 19, 2012 10:27

• dynamic join condition

   create table stg1 (x number)
   
   insert into stg1 values(7134472074);
   
   insert into stg1 values (2814278721);
  
  
   create table stg2 (x number)
   
   insert into stg2 values(7134472074);
   
   insert into stg2 values (2814278721);
  
  commit;

  based on some condition, I want to join either 7134472074 or 2814278721
  

  declare
   x varchar2(100);
   y varchar2(10) := 'n';
   begin
   select b.x
   into x
   from stg1 a, stg2 b
   where a.x = decode(y,'n',7134472074,2814278721);
   
   dbms_output.put_line(x);
   
   end;
   /

  I get ORA-01422: exact extraction returns more number of error rows, requested the audit of the State and adhere to be dynamically?
  
  If so, how?

  >
  I want to join
  >
  Your query is not a join specified for Oraclel is a CARTESIAN join and joins all ranks to stg1 stg2.

  That's why the query returns two rows, and you're trying to put the two values into 'x '.

  Add join to stg2 the query does not return a single line. Instead of simply

  where a.x = decode(y,'n',7134472074,2814278721);
  

  Add join

  where a.x = decode(y,'n',7134472074,2814278721)
      and b.x = a.x;
   
  

• Update of several lines using the join condition

  Hi all
  
  CREATE OR REPLACE
  PROCEDURE update_t
  IS
  
  BEGIN
  SheikYerbouti IN (SELECT EMPLOYEE_ID, FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME FROM hr.employees)
  LOOP
  UPDATE
  HR.employees1
  SET
  FOCA =)
  Select concat (FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME) in the hr.employees where SheikYerbouti. EMPLOYEE_ID = 197);
  END LOOP;
  END update_t;
  /
  
  I'm trying to update column Foca Employees1 table. When I run this procedure, I get the error
  
  Error report:
  ORA-01427: einreihig subquery returns multiple rows
  ORA-06512: at "SYSTEM. UPDATE_T", line 13
  ORA-06512: at line 1
  01427 00000 - "einreihig subquery returns several lines.
  
  Please let me know a solution for this.
  
  Thank you
  Mathon

  Hello Mathieu,
  in your internal SQL result set is not limited to just one line.
  Try this

  UPDATE hr.employees1 SET
  FIRST_LAST= (select concat(FIRST_NAME,LAST_NAME) from hr.employees where emp_rec.EMPLOYEE_ID=hr.employees.employee_id);
  

  Your version had no restrictions on selected lines of hr.employees. You gave a where condition clause that is not related to the query.

  The best solution for your problem is to avoid completely any PL/SQL loop. You can try something like this:

  update
     (select
         e1.first_last,
         e.first_name,
         e.last_name
      from
         hr.employees1 e1,
         hr.employees e
      where
         e1.employee_id=e.employee_id) set
     first_last=first_name||last_name;
  

  But beware, the updates on the joints work only under certain restrictions. The key of the table to be updated must be the join key. (key preserved is the word to look for).

  Hope that helps,
  dhalek

• Join conditions, update a table

  Hello

  I created a table of choice in the apex, so my Dispatcher column, moved to the new table. (first time doing so)

  I created again the dispatcher of the column in the first table.

  I have the following code:

  SELECT R.DISPATCHER, B.DISPATCHER

  OF GCAT_V3 R JOIN GCAT_DISPATCHER_LOOKUP B

  ON R.DISPATCHER_ID = B.DISPATCHER_ID

  DISPATCHER	DISPATCHER
  -	SU. [email protected]
  -	SU. [email protected]
  -	SU. [email protected]
  -	SU. [email protected]

  I need to copy the data back.

  Basically, what I have in the column that b.Dispatcher must be copied to another column dispatcher.

  Any ideas?

  Kind regards

  Leonard

  Hi, Leonard,

  Whenever you have a question, please post a small example of data (CREATE TABLE and only relevant columns, INSERT statements) for all of the tables involved and the accurate results you want from this data, so that people who want to help you can recreate the problem and test their ideas.

  If you ask about a DML operation, such as UPDATE, then INSERT statements, you post should show what looks like the tables before the DML, and the results will be the content of the table changed after the DML.

  Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.

  Always say what version of Oracle you are using (for example, 11.2.0.2.0).

  See the FAQ forum: Re: 2. How can I ask a question on the forums?

  You can use the UPDATE or MERGE to copy data from a table to the existing lines in another.  For example:

  UPDATE gcat_v3 r

  SET dispactcher =)

  SELECT b.dispatcher

  OF gcat_dispatcher_lookup b

  WHERE b.dispatcher_id = r.dispatcher_id

  )

  ;

  The above statement assumes that dispatcher_id is unique in gcat_dispatcher_lookup; But there is no need to be unique in gcat_v3.

• use of rownum in join condition

  Hello
  
  I have three tables OBI_CONSOL_RC_HIER_V and pmt_fact and OBI_INVOICE_DIST_V.
  common columns b/w OBI_CONSOL_RC_HIER_V and pmt_fact is resp_center_id and company_id and geography Id
  common columns b/w pmt_fact and OBI_INVOICE_DIST_V is Invoice_account_num
  
  now, I want to display the name of the provider of OBI_CONSOL_RC_HIER_V and INV_DIST_AMOUNT of OBI_INVOICE_DIST_V and also, she should return top 10 suppliers based on their INV_DIST_AMOUNT.
  
  Please help me.
  
  
  Concerning
  RAM

  Assuming that there is a 1:1 relationship between the suppliers and invoices, this should be fairly simple to resolve:

  select supplier_name
           , inv_dist_amount
  from (
      select OBI_CONSOL_RC_HIER_V.supplier_name
               , OBI_INVOICE_DIST_V.inv_dist_amount
               , rank() over (order by OBI_INVOICE_DIST_V.inv_dist_amount desc) rnk
      from OBI_CONSOL_RC_HIER_V
               join PMT_FACT on (OBI_CONSOL_RC_HIER_V.resp_center_id  = PMT_FACT.company_id
                                 and OBI_CONSOL_RC_HIER_V.resp_center_id = PMT_FACT.company_id
                                 and OBI_CONSOL_RC_HIER_V.Geography_id = PMT_FACT.Geography_id )
               join OBI_INVOICE_DIST_V on (OBI_INVOICE_DIST_V.Invoice_account_num = PMT_FACT.Invoice_account_num )
      where rnk <=10
      )
  /
  

  If there is a different relationship, you need to explain it. According to Frank, give us more information more you have chances to get a useful and relevant response.

  Cheers, APC