Increase the performance of the Insert using e DBlink

Similar Questions

• Satellite P100 - 221 PSPA6E: how to increase the RAM using SD or USB flash memory

  Hello

  I want to spend my memory (2 GB) more than that using SD memory or USB memory.
  I have this happen? If yes how can I to do?

  My computer is:
  Toshiba Satellite P100-221 PSPA6E

  Concerning
  Nevzat

  Post edited by: kanburnevzat

  Hello

  What do you do?
  Using Vista Ready Boost?

  If Yes, please check this page from Microsoft on the Ready Boost feature:
  http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/Windows-Vista/features/ReadyBoost.aspx

  If you want to increase your RAM, then only the memory module larger RAM would be useful for you.

• Increase the size of disk problems

  I just upgraded from Fusion 4 to 5 in preparation for the upgrade of Windows 7 to 8.  When I initially installed my VM several months ago, I waited to invite me on the amount of disk space, I wanted to allocate, but he never did the installation.  He created the virtual machine of 20 GB (boring), which would work if Windows ever wanted to do an update and that you ever wanted to save a file to the virtual computer.

  I used the Fusion to increase the size of the disc to 122 GB (I have over 600 GB available on my Mac) and it is distributed correctly and when I open windows the space was available on drive C.  However, when I discovered the virtual machine to the Virtual Machine in Fusion library it reads 20 GB.

  After more than an hour of reading of the VMWare knowledge base, I found an article that said that I had to increase the disk using Mac disk utility; However, this option is disabled/grayed out for me.  Another article proposed a ton of utility downloads to do this and overall I am lost.  It would be completely avoidable BS if the installation would have helped clarify the size of my disk on the installtion of the virtual machine.  Alas, it's wasn't the case.

  My question is does my windows hard disk shows 122 GB total space, but the library of virtual machines VMWare shows correct 20 GB and what can I expect if I start tyring upgrade to Windows 8 in terms of space?  Is there allocated 20 or 122 GB?

  Thank you.

  I just upgraded from Fusion 4 to 5 in preparation for the upgrade of Windows 7 to 8.  When I initially installed my VM several months ago, I waited to invite me on the amount of disk space, I wanted to allocate, but he never did the installation.  He created the virtual machine of 20 GB (boring), which would work if Windows ever wanted to do an update and that you ever wanted to save a file to the virtual computer.

  IIRC A Windows 7 Virtual PC to a 40 GB in VMware Fusion 4.x by default however any default size one can always modify virtual hardware parameters before installing an operating system.  Anyway to increase the size of the virtual hard disk is a process in two stages, the first of which is made in the settings of the Virtual Machine's hard drive.  The second part is made with a 3rd party utility or the OS itself, when it is necessary and it is applicable in the case of Windows 7.

  In Windows 7, just go to disk management and extend the Volume, he tries but a few seconds.

  Note: Before performing any disk level operations such as this should ensure that you have a clean backup * of the entire Virtual Machine.

  =========

  * It is a known fact that Time Machine is not 100% reliable backing up/restoring VMS in all circumstances/conditions.  Also back up Virtual Machines via Time Machine of disk/time intensive and wastes a lot of space for something that may be corrupted and worthless time to restore it.  At least I would exclude the Virtual Machines with virtual machines and Time Machine shutdown, not suspended and VMware Fusion closed and then manually copy the VMS to another location, preferably on a different physical hard drive.  So keep the user data stored in the virtual machine saved out of the Virtual Machine on a regular basis in order to always have a backup of the current user data.  If you need to restore a properly saved by VM is not as common at least you will have a virtual working Machine and data user to go forward with when you find out your Time Machine backup of the virtual machine fails.

• Overhead of the graphic use of Wfm as a Subvi output terminal?

  -My basic question:
  If the front is closed, is there a difference between a graph of Wfm and Wfm indicator as output terminal?

  -The question in context:
  I have a no reentrante Subvi, which will take place in my program and an output waveform.  Sometimes, I want to open the front of the Subvi and adjust its internal settings displaying its output on a graph of Wfm.

  The minimum solution would appear to make the graph of Wfm of the Subvi double panel as the output terminal, as opposed to the output through an indicator of Wfm.  But who would increase the resources used during normal operation of the Subvi?

  Thanks in advance and have a nice day.

  -Brad

  There should be no overhead. The chart would update only if the front is open. Most of the time, there are not yet signs before the subVIs in memory.

  Mike...

• is it possible to use external memory to increase the performance of my computer?

  I have a slow xp and each program/app/files in an external drive.
  But I want to know if I can improve the performance of my control memory left him in the external drive.

  Hi cesar vidal,.

  1. What is the total capacity of the hard drive primary?
  2. Since when are you facing problems of performance on the computer?

  Method 1

  There is no way the use of the memory or the space left in the external drive to increase the performance of the computer.

  See the article and check if it helps increase the performance of the computer.

  Slow PC? Optimize your computer for peak performance

  http://www.Microsoft.com/athome/Setup/optimize.aspx

  Method 2

  It is possible that some third-party programs installed on the computer is at the origin of the performance problem.

  I suggest that you put the computer in a clean boot state and check if it helps.

  To help resolve the error and other messages, you can start Windows XP by using a minimal set of drivers and startup programs. This type of boot is known as a "clean boot". A clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts.

  See the link below to learn more about how to clean boot.

  How to configure Windows XP to start in a "clean boot" State

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353

  Reset the computer to start as usual

  When you are finished troubleshooting, follow these steps to reset the computer to start as usual:

  (a) click Start, type msconfig in the search box and press ENTER.

  (b) If you are prompted for an administrator password or for confirmation, type your password or click on continue.

  (c) under the general tab, click the Normal startup option, and then click OK.

  (d) when you are prompted to restart the computer, click on restart.

• I want to increase the performance of the PC using Readyboost

  Here are my stats to computer

  Windows vista home (32-bit) sp2
  Intel Pentium Dual CPU E2160 @ 1.80 Ghz
  2 GB of RAM
  now I want to increase the performance of the pc using readyboost
  How can I do
  also how can I get the max of readyboost performance
  is there a support for an external device?
  thnx in advance
  Original title: readyboost

  Hello

  'ram 2 GB'

  You have too much RAM for Readyboost work effectively.

  ReadyBoost is designed for machines that have between 500 MB - 1 GB RAM

  The physical RAM you have installed, less you will notice an improvement using Readyboost.

  This is a very good tutorial on how to configure Readyboost:

  http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/tutorials/using-Windows-ReadyBoost-to-increase-performance/

  See you soon.

• Followed by the use - cannot perform the insert inside a trans READ ONLY operation

  Hello
  
  I have experienced the following error message when you try to install a line in our table of s_nq_acct for USAGE TRACKING:
  
  [nQSError: 16001] ODBC error state: S1000 code: 1456 message: [Oracle] [ODBC] [Ora] ORA-01456: cannot insert/delete/update operation in a READ ONLY transaction.
  
  -I am able to insert manually the lines through SQL * more while only logged in as the same user that the Connection Pool
  -L' read-only option is not checked for the ODBC
  
  Can someone help me with this please?
  
  Thank you
  
  Rhys

  I'm happy to have helped.

  Feel free to click on the relatively useful or appropriate to award points :)

• Increase the performance of MAC with the SSD upgrade

  I have a 21.5-inch iMac model 14.1 (end 2013) with 8 GB of memory and a 1 TB drive. On this, I use some applications in memory such as Adobe CS 5.5 and VMWare Fusion 8.1.1. I have Applecare on the machine until September 2017. I often find myself running out of memory. My goto solution would be to increase the memory and replace the hard drive with an SSD. I fear, however, that this cancels my Applecare. My research indicates that while that frowned upon, I can upgrade my memory and keep my Applecare as long as it is done by an authorized by Apple, but if I do the SSD I'm out of luck for the installed components. My thought is that I can get an external SSD and move the ' WIndows 10' VM (s), as well as expand and move the swapfiles for the SSD system.»

  My questions are am I right about the Applecare and warranty and I plan to use an external SSD to accelerate performance and ease the work of memory constraints?

  I have f

  I have a Macbook Air in 2010 and also a 2008 iMac - both with only 4 GB of memory (you have twice as much), both running El Capitan and the two with SSD - and perform very well. The 2008 iMac used to have a rotating disc which has recently failed, with the replacement of SSD, it is a remarkable transformation with the new SSD, it seems very quickly for me. Both have Photoshop CS4, which is not used much more, but they run this software very well, as well as MS Office 2011 and other programs such as Mail, Safari, Firefox, etc. (Firefox + Photoshop together put a noticeable load on machines, in fact, but while I sometimes hear the fans come on the Macbook Air, it maintains not up very well) No slowdown) You'll be in great shape with a SSD for your newer computer. These old machines that I use have Core 2 Duo CPUs, chips relatively slow, but they seem very quickly with the SSD.

  You will need to check with Apple directly on your AppleCare and so that would be affected. I don't know that anyone is not Apple should trust this question.

• RAM 1 GB upgrade will increase the performance of the Satellite Pro M30?

  My ram size is currenty 512 MB.
  I have the model Satellite Pro M30.
  As the old model, my laptop would be faster if I increase to 1 GB

  Hello

  Of course, the 1 GB of RAM would help increase the performance of your laptop.
  It must be useful for faster loading applications.
  You will notice also that your tools and other software will be faster.

  To upgrade to the 1 GB RAM, you would need two 512 MB modules.
  Usually the PC2700 DDR - RAM 512 MB module must be compatible.

  Welcome them

• Re: Satellite L500-19Z - how to increase the performance of the game?

  Hey

  Basically, I have a Toshiba Satellite L500-19z, with chipsets Intel Series 4 express. I know this isn't a particularly good game, but surely the performance of game should be reasonable?

  I get 80% of the time lag - while on my old laptop (which costs no more than £200) I could play World of Warcraft on it no problem (I played the Sims3 on this laptop and had very few problems. I'm playing Dragon Age, but it is almost impossible.) My laptop is not more than 8 months old.

  I just want to know if there is a way to increase the performance of the game? I thought that maybe to connect my laptop to a PC Tower, but that could lead to the worst game performance, so I said.
  I'm sure I can't replace the graphics card, I've updated my drivers, defragment disks and so on.

  Any help is really appreciated, thanks in advance.

  Hello

  Is there anything to do to increase game performance. It depends on the graphics card and Intel cards are not designed for games, they are a good choice for mobile use because they don t need a lot of power.
  In addition, the peut t graphics card be exchanged, s thereby.

  It s always depending on the game that you can play. Therefore, check the system requirements of all the games you want to play and if your graphics card is supported. Not all games support all graphics cards.

  You must also use low graphics settings in each game. You can use the parameters of t.

  For example on my Satellite U400, possessing the same Intel graphics card, I can play Half Life 2 which has already 5 years but always low medium graphics settings.

• ways to increase the performance of the processor

  It might be a silly thing to ask, but I can use a 4 GB USB key to increase the performance of the processor

  during execution of the movies netflix and Amazon to steam. I have 17.4 GB of free space, but then the streaming of the CPU usage is maxed out

  c increace disk space I made the following suggestions given by someone else in the community:

   You can create more free space in C by doing one of the following suggested measures.

  The default allocation for the restoration of the system is 12% on your C partition is more generous. I have them would be reduced by 700 MB. Make my computer right click on your icon, and select System Restore. Place the cursor on your C drive select settings but this time find the slider and drag it to the left until it shows 700 MB and output. When you get to the settings screen, click on apply and OK and leave.

  A flaw that might be useless which is for temporary internet files, especially if you keep no copies on the disk offline. Setting the default value is 3% of the walk. Depending on your attitude to copies offline, you could bring it to 1% or 2%. In Internet Explorer, select Tools, Internet Options, general, temporary Internet files, settings to make the change. At the same time, look at the number of days, the story stands.

  The default allocation for the basket is 10% of the disk. Change to 5%, which should be enough. In Windows Explorer hover over your Recycle Bin, right click and select Properties, Global and move the slider from 10% to 5%. However, try to let you become so complete that if it is complete and you delete a file by mistake it will bypass the Recycle Bin and have gone forever.

  Operating system

  MS Windows XP Professional SP3 32-bit

  CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT

  Intel Pentium III - M

  Tualatin 0.13 technology

  RAM

  1.00 GB OF SDRAM

  Motherboard

  IBM 2648AU0 (no) 52 ° c.

  Graphics

  ThinkPad TV (1024x768@60Hz)

  S3 Graphics SuperSavage/IXC 1014

  Hard drives

  29.3 GB IC25N030ATCS04-0 (PATA) 47 ° C

  Optical drives

  HITACHI DVD - ROM GD-S250

  Audio

  Intel (r) 82801 CA/CAM AC 97 Audio Controller

  Hello

  Right-click on any video 'flash' and select 'Settings' in the context menu, select the option "use hardware acceleration"...

  You have a graphics card installed... flash videos will / should use his memory for buffering streaming.

  go

  Start > Control Panel > drivers

  or look for updates of your display driver...

  or

  go

  Start > run > dxdiag > display tab, a diagnosis of your display drivers.

• If I activate 2 processors in msconfig, it will increase the performance of my computer... !

  If I activate 2 processors in msconfig > advanced > number of processors to 2 it will increase the performance of my computer... !

  Original title: two processors

  In most cases, you will probably have to use these options, but they can come in handy. For example, if you think that a startup problem is caused by the presence of more than one processor, you can limit the number of processors used to boot the system by activating the checkbox number of processors, and specifying a number.

  Mr President I'm on hp xw6400 workstation it has 2 processors and I use windows 10 on it, I want to run the two processors at the same time to improve performance is anyway you can tell me how...

  Hello

  Installation is possible, however, the operating system will use a processor at a single time. There are also the prerequisites if you want this kind of installation. Even if it is possible, we have no advice to use both processors at the same time, because performance will always be bottleneck depending on the hardware and the operating system you are using.

  Kind regards.

• Increase the performance of pl/sql delete

  version: 10g

  Hi all

  Help me please by increasing the performance of the code below,

  The code below takes about 10 min for deletion in 80 tables he recovered. Each table it does not remove more than 50,000 thousands

  Is there another way I can increase the performance of the below.

  I thought to delete forall, but I don't think its useful in this context.

  DECLARE

  v_num_2 PLS_INTEGER: = 50000;

  BEGIN

  THE C1

  (SELECT master: '.) '       || table_name table_name

  From all_tables owner WHERE = 'ARCHIVE' AND num_rows > 0 ORDER BY table_name

  )

  LOOP

  BEGIN

  EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'remove'. C1.table_name |

  "where arch_ts < (sysdate-530) and rownum < =' | ' v_num_2;

  END LOOP;

  END;

  Thanks in advance

  Without asking what purpose your code is used:

  You can enable parallel DML and add a hint of parallel to your delete statement.

  Something like (not tested, but you'll get the idea):

  Start

  immediate 'alter session enable dml parallel. "

  --

  C1 in (select master: '.) ' || table_name table_name

  from all_tables

  where owner = "ARCHIVE".

  and num_rows > 0

  -order of table_name<-- not="" really="" needed,="" is="">

  )

  loop

  Start

  run immediately "remove / * + parallel (t 4) * / ' |"

  'from' | C1.table_name | |' t ' |

  "where arch_ts".< (sysdate-530)="">

  'and rownum '.<= 50000="">

  end loop;

  --

  immediate "alter session disable dml" parallel execution

  end;

  /

  You can test with different values for the declaration of principles (degree of parallelism), 4 in the index and find the optimal value.

• Increase the performance of research in the interactive report

  Hello
  
  I created a report that around 10,000 + records. To load the report, it does not have a lot of time. But when I do a search in interactive report that it takes a lot of time. Please suggest me how to increase the performance of interactive research.
  
  I use Oracle apex 3.2 and Oracle 10 g XE database.
  
  
  Please suggest me.
  
  Thank you
  Sudhir

  Antonio,

  Pagination: thank you. My concern was if pagination is in the form "x y z", where z is the total number of lines, then all lines may need to be returned to produce the total number.

  Function: Nice modular approach. As suggested above, four by rank function calls could produce a LOT of overhead in APEX (or elsewhere). A way to see if it is part of the problem, replace the code in function just a call with the code online and see if you get a large (15 to 20%) to accelerate.

  Howard

• Remote index not used with INSERT in the local table on dblink

  Hi all
  
  I don't know if anyone has come across this problem before, but for some reason any the remote index remains unused ONLY* in the insertion on the local database operation. Let me explain this pseudo-device code
  
  insert into LOCAL_TABLE
  Select / * + index_combine (alias_remote_tab IDX_LOG_DATE) * /.
  trunc (log_datetime),
  Count (*)
  of REMOTE_TABLE@DBLINK alias_remote_tab
  When trunc (log_datetime) = trunc(sysdate-1)
  Trunc Group (log_datetime);
  
  where:
  REMOTE_TABLE is a table partitioned on log_datetime (monthly)
  IDX_LOG_DATE is an index of bitmap of based on a valid function on log_datetime created in the trunc (log_datetime)
  local database: 10 gr 2
  remote database: 11 GR 1 material
  OS: windows (both)
  
  More funny thing is when I just run the select query independently on the only both local and remote, the index is used. I checked by printing the command explain for the select query plan. But when I prefix the query with the insert lose all hell breaks and local database plays the ignorance about the index. The command for the insert query explain plan has no mention of the index even when I explicitly place the index indicator in the select part of the query.
  
  If this should not be simple enough for ORACLE? Am I missing something here?

  Jonathan describes the details and the reasons for the behavior you see in following blog post http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/distributed-dml/
  Your SELECTION is performed remotely (filtering and grouping) and sends only the (relatively) small results via dblink local database while the in an INSERTION, filtering only occurs at the remote and data site (relatively) important are sent via dblink to the local database, the consolidation takes place.
  You can give a try to the approach proposed by michaels2. If the approach from the view result grouping and filtering which will take place in the remote database, you will see improved performance.

  PS BTW, if the sql code that I suggested to check the plane, in my previous post using an index, then the cause of your performance issue is certainly not due to the index not used and is due to the amount of data transferred to dblink.