Index and lines in cluster

Thus, according to Oradoc: create an index if you frequently want to retrieve less than 15% of the rows in a large table. The percentage varies greatly according to the relative speed of a table scan and how data are distributed in what concerns the index key. Faster analysis of the table, the percentage is lower; more grouped data line, the higher the percentage.

two or three paragraphs down

http://docs.Oracle.com/database/121/Admin/indexes.htm#ADMIN11712

With regard to the part I bolded ~ say rank clustered tables may be good candidates for indexing for tables/columns that would otherwise not indexed (I have an idea, the grouping is relative to the indexed key. I also know how it effects rebuild an index vs colescing).

Is the instruction above a correct support on my part? I don't need a detailed analysis, I want to know if my assumption is correct as I go even further. I have read a bunch of google links, but this isn't the area on indexing, I want to focus on right now.

Thank you very much

Thus, according to Oradoc: create an index if you frequently want to retrieve less than 15% of the rows in a large table. The percentage varies greatly according to the relative speed of a table scan and how data are distributed in what concerns the index key. Faster analysis of the table, the percentage is lower; more grouped data line, the higher the percentage.

two or three paragraphs down

http://docs.Oracle.com/database/121/Admin/indexes.htm#ADMIN11712

With regard to the part I bolded ~ say rank clustered tables may be good candidates for indexing for tables/columns that would otherwise not indexed (I have an idea, the grouping is relative to the indexed key. I also know how it effects rebuild an index vs colescing).

No. (you said you didn't want a detailed analysis!)

I'm now sure what you mean by "tables line cluster" but done doc refers to a regular job with a regular index table.

And by "more grouped the data in row" doc refers to the factor of grouping of the index which is the index blocks how should be read to find the data you want.

The data in the table can be in a SINGLE command. There will be one or more columns that define the order. This order will put the data with the values for the columns in the same block and ID of these blocks is then more likely to be in the same block index if you create an index on those columns.

This article by eminent expert index Richard Foote comments on factors clusters

https://richardfoote.WordPress.com/2013/05/08/important-clustering-factor-calculation-improvement-fix-you/

And it explains an interesting new twist available only for the 12 c.

https://richardfoote.WordPress.com/category/clustering-factor/

There are several percentages thrown around as to when an index "could" be used. This quote from doc mentions 15%, others mention 20% or say things like 'low cardinality' and others.

The reality is that there are other factors involved and you can't really base a decision on a percentage. A grouping factor will be useful for controlling a given and an index on the columns that determine the order of the data. So for a second index (third, etc.) the factor will not help.

And you insert, update and delete data, clustering factor will also change. To influence the clustering factor, you literally sort ALL data, which of course means a full table scan and data transfer.

It might be useful for a small set of use cases involving rare LMD data warehouse tables that are loaded in mass.

Always test.

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • Index and MATCH with several conditions

    Hi all! I hope I can explain what I'm trying to do here clearly. This is my first shot:

    In the table below "Office entry Worksheet - area 1" I am trying to insert a formula in column B which will result in an answer ' true / false ' and be used for conditional highlighting

    The first condition that must be met is that the checkbox in the table "Labor and material Checklist" column A or check, if it is not checked, then move to the next line. If the box is checked, then the following condition would need to index and match with column C of table "Office entry Worksheet - area 1" in column B. If there is a match in column C, then move to the next line of column B in the table 'labor and material Checklist '. This continues until there is a 'match', then highlight column B in the table "entry Office sheet - surface 1" in red (or something like "MISSING task")

    It is an estimate and the idea is to ensure that the Phases that are checked in the table "Labor and material Checklist" will not miss when you use the table "entry office map - zone 1".

    Thank you very much for your help!

    Tim

    Is it possible that I can download this spreadsheet file?

  • How to sort and distribution in cluster-table new dashboards?

    Hello

    I have three paintings of an integer (), B (timestamp) and C (double).

    Now, I want to convert them into a table of cluster. The Bay of cluster size is the number of different values in array A (here: two different values 1 and 2)

    If index 0 of the cluster array contains arrays of integers 1 and two with all values of the other two tables where the index of array A is 1.

    Index 1 of the cluster array contains arrays of integers 2 and two with all the values of the other two tables corresponding to the index of array A 2.

    How is that possible?

    Thank you and best regards

    Here is a simple solution that uses table OpenG tools.

  • Indexing and who should do it

    I work for a company that has a fairly large data warehouse Oracle that we use to store the SAP data dissemination (about 500 M of lines for some tables). Tables are not indexed and if I try to reach them on the query takes hours to complete. If the DBA needs to be proactive and create these indexes in order to reduce the load on the database?

    The team wants to load our 40 hours for 3 indices Department ADMINISTRATOR has already provided a script for. I'm naïve or y at - it something crazy to need 40 hours to implement 3 clues? I should mention that these tables is related to SAP and should be indexed to joined already IMO.

    I'm just trying to understand if I'm missing something.

    Thank you

    Creation of parallel indexing can reduce your time to create, but you must "alter index noparallel xyz" after its creation if you want really not parallel to this topic.

    Another impact on the creation of index how long does is how fast your hardware (processors, processor speed, speed of SAN etc.), but also what else is no running on the database in time using server resources.

    On an AIX Power 7-3 processor (quad core) production server it took me about 15 minutes to create an index on a table of 600 million lines running at the same time 8.

    On an AIX Power 5-4 Intel (quadruple-heart) test server it took about twice as long.  The SAN on production was super fast as well which had impact on how long it took.

    There are other factors that will affect the creation time.

    Specifically that I seriously doubt they can justify bill you for 40 hours.  It is unlikely that someone will run a script and then watching the screen for the next 40 hours waiting for the index to create... unless they are a bunch of clowns.  More than likely they run the script, go and do other things and periodically check to see if she has completed.

    Your IT team is having a laugh.  It should be fun to ask them to justify and to break the 40 hours.  minute to copy the script on the server, 30 seconds to go, 30 seconds to run the script.  39hrs, of 58 minutes watching the screen ready to create index at the end... Hmm... sounds fishy to me.

  • (ORA-00955) conflict of naming for index and constraint when you use a unique index (.. desc,.. CSA)

    Hello

    indexes and constraints are in different namespaces, so it should be possible to give them the same name.

    In the following case that apparently does not work:

    create unique index orders_year_show_uq
      on orders (year desc, show_orders asc);
     
     alter table orders
      add constraint orders_year_show_uq unique (year, show_order);
    

    When I run these statement, I get a "SQL Error: ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing object". ""

    If I clean and I execute the same instructions as above with the only difference on the 2 line, using "asc year" instead of "year desc":

    
      on orders (year asc, show_orders asc);
    

    then it success.

    I can't explain it, you have an idea?

    Thanks in advance.

    Kind regards

    Giovanni

    First of all, you have show_orders in index and show_order in the constraint. I'll assume that it's a typo. Second, when you create constraint without index enhance the specification Oracle seeks indexes existing on the same set of columns in ascending order. If this index does not exist (and it's your case, since one of your columns to index is in descending order), Oracle tries to create one with the same name as the constraint. That's why you get ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing object. In general, you can specify explicitly the index name to force the Oracle by using the existing index. But it will not help you. If you issue

    ALTER table orders add unique constraint (year, show_orders) orders_year_show_uq using index orders_year_show_uq;

    You will get the ORA-14196: specified index cannot be used to apply the constraint.

    In any case, Oracle does not support using index DESC for PK/UK.

    SY.

  • spatial index and normal index

    Hi space specialists,.

    I have a question for spatial index performance and how Oracle manages queries that have a space and regular condition combined. We are on the Oracle 10 g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 database

    Take a query like this one (not a real query but based on the type of query that is generated by ArcGIS):

    Select objectid

    attribute

    geometry

    table

    where mdsys.sdo_filter (geometry, mdsys.sdo_geometry (: gtype1,: srid1, null,: elem_info1,: ordinates1), 'querytype = window') = 'TRUE '.

    and attribute = value

    In our scenario, we have a lot of rows in the table (2 million), but we have only a few lines (2000) where attribute = value.

    It seems that there is a scenario where the performance is really bad. It takes 5 seconds for the query to return the results and you're just too slow for our needs. There is a spatial index on a geometry and a normal index on the field for the attribute. The plan of the explain command shows that both the spatial index and the index of the attribute are used.

    Of course, we can break to the top of the table in separate tables by object type. This would make the index space datamodel much more efficient, but at the expense of our current simple, abstract.

    Do you have suggestions on how we can improve performance without too much impact on our datamodel? Oracle for example has an option where you can create a spatial index on a subset of the data in a table?

    Thank you!

    Rob

    Do not know whether or not the following works for your case:

    use the column range-key attribute to create a partitioned table Beach and then create a local spatial index.

  • Error in database engine Microsoft JET '80004005' operation must use an update query.  / fax_remove/index.asp, line 115

    everything began to receive the following error message

    Microsoft JET Database Engine error '80004005'

    Operation must use an update query.

    /fax_remove/index.asp line 115


    for the following Web page

    Remove.canchair.com


    no coding changes have been achieved

    Use your host control panel to check the permissions of the remote folder that contains the mdb and the mdb itself. Contact your host if you are unsure how to proceed.

  • Indexes and constraints

    Hi guys!

    I did a little test and now I do not understand the result. Please explain to me the following:

    (1.) I created the following table emp1

    < pre >
    CREATE TABLE emp1
    (
    EmpNo NUMBER CONSTRAINT emp1_pk PRIMARY KEY
    USING INDEX
    (
    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX emp1_idx ON emp1 (empno)
    )
    );
    < / pre >

    2.) now, I interviewed user_indexes and user_constraints

    < pre >
    SELECT i.index_name, i.index_type, i.uniqueness, c.constraint_name, c.constraint_type, c.status
    From user_indexes i, user_constraints c
    WHERE i.table_name (+) = c.table_name
    AND c.constraint_name AS 'emp1_pk '.
    ORDER BY c.constraint_name;
    < / pre >
    The result displays the following lines:
    < pre >
    INDEX_NAME INDEX_TYPE UNIQUENESS CONSTRAINT_NAME, CONSTRAINT_TYPE STATUS
    ---------------------
    NORMAL SINGLE ACTIVE P EMP1_PK EMP1_IDX
    < / pre >

    3.) after that I disabled the emp1_pk constraint and I Redid the same query

    < pre >
    ALTER TABLE emp1 DISABLE NOVALIDATE CONSTRAINT emp1_pk;

    SELECT i.index_name, i.index_type, i.uniqueness, c.constraint_name, c.constraint_type, c.status
    From user_indexes i, user_constraints c
    WHERE i.table_name (+) = c.table_name
    AND c.constraint_name AS 'emp1_pk '.
    ORDER BY c.constraint_name;
    < / pre >
    The result displays the following lines:
    < pre >
    INDEX_NAME INDEX_TYPE UNIQUENESS CONSTRAINT_NAME, CONSTRAINT_TYPE STATUS
    ---------------------
    EMP1_PK NULL NULL NULL P DISABLED
    < / pre >

    So far so good. I got disabling of this constraint is okay to delete the corresponding index. But in the following example, the corresponding index would not be deleted.

    < pre >
    CREATE TABLE emp2
    (
    EmpNo NUMBER
    );

    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX emp2_idx
    ON emp2 (empno);

    ALTER TABLE emp2
    ADD CONSTRAINT emp2_pk PRIMARY KEY to the AID of INDEX emp2_idx;
    < / pre >

    2.) now, I interviewed user_indexes and user_constraints

    < pre >
    SELECT i.index_name, i.index_type, i.uniqueness, c.constraint_name, c.constraint_type, c.status
    From user_indexes i, user_constraints c
    WHERE i.table_name (+) = c.table_name
    AND c.constraint_name AS 'emp1_pk '.
    ORDER BY c.constraint_name;
    < / pre >
    The result displays the following lines:
    < pre >
    INDEX_NAME INDEX_TYPE UNIQUENESS CONSTRAINT_NAME, CONSTRAINT_TYPE STATUS
    ---------------------
    NORMAL SINGLE ACTIVE P EMP2_PK EMP2_IDX
    < / pre >

    The result of this query is the same as emp1_pk. But at the next step, the results differ.

    < pre >
    ALTER TABLE emp2 DISABLE NOVALIDATE CONSTRAINT emp2_pk;

    SELECT i.index_name, i.index_type, i.uniqueness, c.constraint_name, c.constraint_type, c.status
    From user_indexes i, user_constraints c
    WHERE i.table_name (+) = c.table_name
    AND c.constraint_name AS 'emp1_pk '.
    ORDER BY c.constraint_name;
    < / pre >
    The result displays the following lines:
    < pre >
    INDEX_NAME INDEX_TYPE UNIQUENESS CONSTRAINT_NAME, CONSTRAINT_TYPE STATUS
    ---------------------
    NORMAL EMP2_PK UNIQUE P DISABLED EMP2_IDX
    < / pre >

    That's what I did not understand. Emp1_pk has been disabled and the corresponding index emp1_idx was abandoned. Emp2_pk has been turned off but the corresponding index has not been deleted. Can someone explain to me please, the difference between the example 1 (emp1_pk) and example 2 (emp2_pk).

    Concerning

    Hello

    In the first example, Index was done by primary key, and when we disable the primary key, it also drops the corresponding index.
    But in the second example, the Index is created on the column separately and then the primary key is created. Now that there is already an index on the primary key column will use this existing index and when we disable the constraint this index will not be droppped because it was not created by primary key. It was only used by primary key.

    Concerning

  • clustered index and non-clustered indexes

    Hi ihave read on index qqustion

    in SQL Server, table has 1 clustered index and 280 (average) no clustered index.
    SqlServer hold a clustered index and the data on the same location. index if cluster command firm data
    but sqlserver hold index non-clustered on another file and do not directly order data.
    oracle index how does this? for example, I have 3 indexes on the table. how they work? is oracle this clustered index and indexes not clustrered?

    Oracle has no cluster & nonclustered indexes.
    Oracle has Btree, bitmap, text, index basis function

    Disappeared through the link
    http://www.lorentzcenter.nl/awcourse/Oracle/server.920/a96520/indexes.htm

  • Right side of the browser blurred and lines appear

    The right side of the nightly build has a serious bug. The right has a blurry text and lines appear on the Mozilla site.

    There is a bug for this report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043961

  • Switching between microphone and line-in in the Realltek Sound Manager

    Ok.
    Now I know where the Realtek Sound Manager, and I can control the parameters of the microphone and speakers.
    But how can I switch between microphone and line-in?
    At the moment I don't see a line of component option snap at all. Is it because it's a kind of auto detect and the opportunity every time I connect something?
    Everyone knows this, or has some experience in this regard?
    Cordially in advance
    Frans

    Sorry but I don't understand what exactly you want.
    You have built in mic or you can use the external microphone connected to the mic-in port.
    When the external microphone is connected a resident will be disabled.

    The question is: what do you want exactly and for what purposes? Please explain what is the reason for this switching between mic and line-in port?

  • Satellite M307 - a lot of points and lines on the screen

    I bought this new pc in China there is a half year
    However, when I move the screen today, there are still a lot of points and lines in this respect.

    But if I don't touch it, it will be OK. I think this may be caused by the connection between the screen and the main physical system. Please contact me: [email protected]

    Thank you!

    Hello!

    I agree with you it's a connection problem or the display is faulty.

    I think your laptop should be still under warranty then I would go to a local ASP.
    They can order all the necessary parts and Exchange.

    Good bye

  • Programmatically set the size of a table control (not the number of col and lines)

    Hi all

    I am trying to create a little VI, in which the user selects the number of columns and rows in a table, and after clicking on a button 'OK', the table control is displayed in the control panel (to be filled in by the user). To do this, I use the nodes property to the number of columns and lines. I have no problem with that.

    However, I want to "limit" the size of the control table (control of himself, not the dimensions of the table) and make use of vertical and horizontal table, the scroll bars. I want to avoid it is that passes type 100 user and 100 lines and appears a huge table control.

    I could tho this by using an array instead of an array, via the node property "size", but I would use an insead table a table.

    Thank you very much

    Daniel

    With a table control, you cannot set the display size to be anything other than a multiple of a complete cell.

    If you are limited to a number of lines and columns.  If you want to resize with more control you also need to resize the control within the Bay, accessible via the property 'picture Element '.

    Another option (but seems huge exaggerated) is to place your table in a secondary and set the size of the secondary to the size you need and enable scrollbars for her.  It is not an option that I would choose but if it helps...

    Have it, your description of your user interface sounds not very intuitive.  How the user knows at any time exactly what cell they access if they have to scroll backwards?

  • How to query the total number of columns and lines filled with data?

    How to get the number of rows and columns in Exel file data using Excel report?

    Since you have posted this question in the forum of LabWindows/CVI, I guess you want to know how to do with CVI.

    You need to know how to open and activate the Excel data file.

    Depending on the function returns the total number of columns and lines col_count row_count, respectively.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    int CountColumnsAndRows (void)
    {
    Error HRESULT = 0;
    CAObjHandle rangeCurrentRegionHandle = 0;
    CAObjHandle rangeColumnsHandle = 0;
    CAObjHandle rangeRowsHandle = 0;
      
    unsigned long col_count = 0, row_count = 0;
      
    Must use the 'A1' property and CruuentRegion count the total of columns and lines, including the drafts!
      
    error = CA_VariantSetCString (& MyCellRangeV, 'A1');
      
    error = Excel_WorksheetRange (ExcelWorksheetHandle, NULL, MyCellRangeV, CA_DEFAULT_VAL, & ExcelRangeHandle);
    If (error<0) goto="">
      
    error = Excel_GetProperty (ExcelRangeHandle, & ErrorInfo, Excel_RangeCurrentRegion, CAVT_OBJHANDLE, & rangeCurrentRegionHandle);
    If (error<0)  goto="" error="">
      
    error = Excel_GetProperty (rangeCurrentRegionHandle, & ErrorInfo, Excel_RangeColumns, CAVT_OBJHANDLE, & rangeColumnsHandle);
    If (error<0)  goto="" error="">
      
    error = Excel_GetProperty (rangeColumnsHandle, & ErrorInfo, Excel_RangeCount, CAVT_LONG, & col_count);
    If (error<0) goto="">
      
    error = Excel_GetProperty (rangeCurrentRegionHandle, & ErrorInfo, Excel_RangeRows, CAVT_OBJHANDLE, & rangeRowsHandle);
    If (error<0)  goto="" error="">
      
    error = Excel_GetProperty (rangeRowsHandle, & ErrorInfo, Excel_RangeCount, CAVT_LONG, & row_count);
    If (error<0) goto="">

    Error:

    CA_VariantClear (& MyCellRangeV);
    CA_VariantClear (& MyVariant);
    ClearObjHandle (& ExcelRangeHandle);
    ClearObjHandle (& rangeCurrentRegionHandle);
    ClearObjHandle (& rangeColumnsHandle);
    ClearObjHandle (& rangeRowsHandle);
      
     
    If (error<>
    ReportAppAutomationError (error);
      
    error return;
    }

  • Why is my screen blurry and lines undulate on the sides? It also keeps the glitter!

    Why is my screen blurry and lines undulate on the sides? It also keeps the glitter!

    Is your very large monitor, like an old TV or flat, as perhaps a few inches thick?  If it is very deep (front to back), you have an old style monitor, and they need to be demagnetised every now and then. Look on the monitor for the menu button and navigate until you find an icon like a horseshoe with a bar slash through it (or like a magnet) and select it.  All wavy and colorful display for one minute and then went back to normal. Also, make sure that all the cables between the monitor and your computer are firmly connected at both ends, even if you have a thin screen.

    If you have a laptop, try to turn the screen and see if the blur changes.  If so, you might have a connector loose inside and may need to be considered at a repair shop. =(

    Best luck!

    (There is a small chance it is a result of burn; made me know if any of them help you, or that they do not apply.)

Maybe you are looking for