installation took too long to run

Similar Questions

• HP LaserJet 1536dnf MFP - installation took too long to run.

  Try installing a laserjet MFP M125a pro on a computer running windows 10.  Get "use installation was taking too long to execute.  This is a fatal error. "I reinstalled the driver software hp, the most recent assistance from the Download Center.  I made sure to print spooler tye is in automatic mode, according to the following link:

  http://support.HP.com/us-en/product/HP-LaserJet-M1530-multifunction-printer-series/3974271/model/397...

  No luck.  Still will not install.

  Hi samshube,

  Please, try the steps in the following order:

  • Uninstall the software. Uninstalling the printer software.
  • Unplug the printer USB cable.
  • Clean boot the computer. How to perform a boot in Windows.
  • Disable all Antivirus programs. Disable Antivirus software.
  • Disable all firewall programs. The WF of end-to-end.
  • Create a new user account. Management of user accounts and connections (Windows 10).
  • Reinstall using HP LaserJet Pro MFP M125/126 series full software and drivers. (Expect that the software will ask you to connect the printer USB cable.)

  Run the HP print and Scan Doctorand let me know what happens!

  If this, or one of the posts on this thread, helped you to solve the problem, please click 'Accept as Solution' said post. To show you 'like', or that they are grateful for my post, please click the thumbs upwards below. If there is anything else I can do to help, please don't forget to let me know!

  I hope these steps help!

• took too long to respond.

  Hello

  I'm trying to connect to the client via Vsphere Vcenter server, I am getting error, below please find attached snap attachment.

  The "address IP of vcenter" took too long to respond...

  Help, please...

  Hi vaibhav,

  Do you think below,

  1. check the vCenter Server service. It probably is running, but you can restart it.

  2. if above doesn't work, restart the SSO service.

  3. then check the Source of the identity in the SSO settings. See if the PDC is running.

  4 do the identity Source connectivity test to the highest point.

  Thank you

• Impossible to install cp1525 reached hp 64 bit of vista windows 99% say that it took too long fatal error try again

  Impossible to install cp1525 reached hp 64 bit of vista windows 99% say that it took too long fatal error try again

  Hi asarabia

  Fatal error documents

  Restore the original factory configuration

• Statement Update takes too long to run

  Hi all
  
  I am trying to run this update statement. But its takes too long to run.
  

      UPDATE ops_forecast_extract b SET position_id = (SELECT a.row_id
          FROM s_postn a
          WHERE UPPER(a.desc_text) = UPPER(TRIM(B.POSITION_NAME)))
          WHERE position_level = 7
          AND b.am_id IS NULL;

          SELECT COUNT(*) FROM S_POSTN; 
          214665

          SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ops_forecast_extract;
          49366

  SELECT count(*)
          FROM s_postn a, ops_forecast_extract b
          WHERE UPPER(a.desc_text) = UPPER(TRIM(B.POSITION_NAME));
   575

  What could be the reason for the update statement to run so long?
  Thank you

  polasa wrote:
  Hi all

  I am trying to run this update statement. But its takes too long to run.

  What could be the reason for the update statement to run so long?

  You did not say what means "too long", but a simple and good reason might be that the scalar subquery on "s_postn" using a full table for each run scan. Potentially this subquery is executed for each row of the table "ops_forecast_extract" that satisfies your filter predicates. 'Potentially' due to "filter/subquery optimization" cunning of the Oracle execution engine that tries to cache results of already executed of instances of subquery. Given that the in-memory hash table that contains these cached results is limited in size, the optimization algorithm depends on the sort order of data and could suffer collisions of hash that it is unpredictable, how this optimization works in your particular case.

  You can view the execution plan, it should at least tell you how Oracle will run the scalar subquery (that tell you nothing about this "filter/subquery optimization" feature).

  Follow the generic guidelines how to generate a useful plan explain output and how to post here:

  Could please post a correctly formatted explain you plan output using DBMS_XPLAN. SCREEN, including the 'Predicate information' section below the plan to provide more details about your statement. Please use the noformat} [{noformat} code {noformat}] {noformat} before tag and {noformat} [{noformat} / code {noformat}] {noformat} tag or after the noformat} {{noformat} code {noformat}} {noformat} tag before and after to improve the readability of the outing:

  In SQL * more:

  SET LINESIZE 130
  
  EXPLAIN PLAN FOR ;
  
  SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY);
  

  Note that the DBMS_XPLAN package. DISPLAY is only available from 9i on.

  In 9i and above, if "Predicate information" section is missing from the DBMS_XPLAN. Output display, but you get the message "Plan table is old version" instead, you must recreate your plan table using the script server '$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/utlxplan.sql '.

  In previous versions, you can run the following in SQL * Plus (on the server) instead:

  @?/rdbms/admin/utlxpls
  

  A different approach in SQL * more:

  SET AUTOTRACE ON EXPLAIN
  
  ;
  

  also displays the execution plan.

  In order to get a better understanding where your statement passes the time, you might want to turn on SQL tracing as described here:

  When your query takes too long...

  and after the "tkprof' out here, too.

  Kind regards
  Randolf

  Oracle related blog stuff:
  http://Oracle-Randolf.blogspot.com/

  SQLTools ++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
  http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676 /.
  http://sourceforge.NET/projects/SQLT-pp/

• Installation takes too long

  The installation window says "Please wait while Skype is installed. This may take a few minutes. "But the few minutes is almost an hour and it didn't happen. It's my second attempt is in vain.

  Try with this installer:

  http://download.Skype.com/MSI/SkypeSetup_6.22.81.105.msi

• Took too long to install the update

  Remember - this is a public forum so never post private information such as numbers of mail or telephone!

  Ideas:

  • You have problems with programs
  • Error messages
  • Recent changes to your computer
  • What you have already tried to solve the problem

  Rzhev,

  Please post with the information requested here: what to post in the Windows Update forum
  Start with these troubleshooting steps and post returns with the requested info and arises from the troubleshooting.

  Clean boot your PC, and then run Windows Update.

  Reset the Windows Update components

  Perform operations of KB883825

  Mike - Engineer Support Microsoft Answers
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• SQL query takes too long to run (1 h 25 min)... pls help how to set up the query.

  Hello

  Could someone please help how to tune the query as its takes a long time to retrieve the results.

  Select

  col1,

  col2,

  col3,

  COL4,

  col5,

  col6,

  col7,

  COL8,

  col9,

  col10,

  Col11,

  col12,

  Sum (volume1),

  Sum (volume2),

  Sum (volume3),

  Sum (volume4),

  Sum (volume5),

  Sum (volume6),

  Sum (volume7),

  Sum (volume8),

  Sum (volume9),

  Sum (volume10),

  Sum (volume11),

  Sum (volume12),

  Sum (volume13),

  Sum (volume14),

  Sum (volume15),

  Sum (volume16),

  Sum (volume17),

  Sum (Volume18),

  Sum (volume19),

  Sum (volume20),

  Sum (rate1),

  Sum (rate2),

  Sum (rate3),

  Sum (rate4),

  Sum (rate5),

  Sum (rate6),

  Sum (rate7),

  Sum (rate8),

  Sum (rate9),

  Sum (rate10),

  Sum (rate11),

  Sum (rate12),

  Sum (rate13),

  Sum (rate14),

  Sum (rate15),

  Sum (rate16),

  Sum (rate17),

  Sum (rate18)

  Sum (rate19),

  Sum (rate20)

  Of

  Table 1 - 13, 25, 99, 400 records

  Table2 - 13, 45, 1000 records

  Table 3 - 4, 50, 000 records

  Table 4 - 1,00,000 records

  table5 - 30 000 records

  where tabl1.col1 = table2.col2,

  Table1.Col1 = table3.col1.

  table2.col2 = table3.col2...

  Group

  Sum (volume1),

  Sum (volume2),

  Sum (volume3),

  Sum (volume4),

  Sum (volume5),

  Sum (volume6),

  Sum (volume7),

  Sum (volume8),

  Sum (volume9),

  Sum (volume10),

  Sum (volume11),

  Sum (volume12),

  Sum (volume13),

  Sum (volume14),

  Sum (volume15),

  Sum (volume16),

  Sum (volume17),

  Sum (Volume18),

  Sum (volume19),

  Sum (volume20),

  Sum (rate1),

  Sum (rate2),

  Sum (rate3),

  Sum (rate4),

  Sum (rate5),

  Sum (rate6),

  Sum (rate7),

  Sum (rate8),

  Sum (rate9),

  Sum (rate10),

  Sum (rate11),

  Sum (rate12),

  Sum (rate13),

  Sum (rate14),

  Sum (rate15),

  Sum (rate16),

  Sum (rate17),

  Sum (rate18)

  Sum (rate19),

  Sum (rate20)

  Thank you

  Prasad.

  > Could someone please help how to tune the query as its takes a long time to retrieve the results.

  The query you posted is obviously fake.

  If you ask to give us a request that you do not post and we cannot see.

  For real?

• Query takes too long to run after clone

  Hi all
  
  We have a query that works well in our development environment and take about 15 seconds to run the query. When we run the same query with the same parameters in a recently cloned instance, the query takes 1200 dry run.
  Please help us on this issue.
  
  Thank you
  Rambaud

  Thanks for any response.
  We have solved the problem by using indicators of index.

  Thanks for the update!

• "Details: the server took too long to respond." (The operation has timed out) »

  I get this error when I try to connect to a host. I have

  Verify that DNS is correctly configured. I can ping to and from the host

  but unable to connect the Virtual Infrastructure Client. I tried

  restart the Virtual Center service and that has not worked. I rebooted

  service mgmt-vmware host and this did not help either.

  Hello

  It seems that your process spend is in trouble, kill the process pass and start the service mgmt-vmware.

  I hope that this solves your problem.

• Loop for taking too long to execute

  Hello fellow users of LabVIEW

  I've met a huge problem that follows since loop takes too long to run, I have to run two for loops as the next, and they both take together horribly long - 18 seconds on average. Surprisingly, when I combined the two loops it took even more time.

  

  The for loop above is done (or should do) after the part of the code:

  for i = 1 : 11850
      signalAvr(i) = signal(i);
      for j = 1 : 149
          signalAvr(i) = signalAvr(i) + signal(i + j);
      end
  end
  

  Is it possible to speed up this loop? What I am doing wrong?

  Thank you

  Smdx

  I have not fully tested, but see if it works for you.  It is much simpler.

  

  EDIT: Ok, dkfire got beat to it.  At least we came with the same solution independently.  I just used the tunnel autoindex where he preallocated table and replaced elements.  The two ways you will get the same result.

• Executed scripts takes too long

  Hello

  I hope for more help with improvement / reducing the amount of time required to get a script to run. I have provided the following script to our CMDB group but they say it take too long to run (full day).

  I already use the get-view option to extract the details. Maybe someone can advise how they would improve this script. For the record, we have 2000 + vm in our environment.

  Script is attached.

  Any help is very appreciated.

  Hello, VM_.

  Well, nobody likes a slow script, that's for sure.  And a script of the day?  Double boo to that.

  I had a quick glance, and there were some spots of improvement.  I have them made here:

  Add-PSSnapin VMware.VimAutomation.Core
  
  function Get-VMSerial {  ## rewrote to take UUID; already being gotten in properties below  # param([VMware.VimAutomation.ViCore.Impl.V1.Inventory.VirtualMachineImpl]$VirtualMachine)  # $s = ($VirtualMachine.ExtensionData.Config.Uuid).Replace("-", "")  param([string]$Uuid)  $s = $Uuid.Replace("-", "")  $Uuid = "VMware-"  for ($i = 0; $i -lt $s.Length; $i += 2)  {    $Uuid += ("{0:x2}" -f [byte]("0x" + $s.Substring($i, 2)))    if ($Uuid.Length -eq 30) { $Uuid += "-" } else { $Uuid += " " }  }
  
    return $Uuid.TrimEnd()}
  
  # Connect to vcenterConnect-VIServer vcenter
  
  #Gathering VM settingsWrite-Verbose -Verbose "Gathering VM statistics"$VMReport = @()$Count = 0
  
  ## no need to use Get-VM#Get-VM | % {## moved outside of the Foreach-Object scriptblock, so this Get-View only gets called once, not 2000+ times (not once per VM, just once at all)$filter = @{"Config.Template"="false"}Get-View -ViewType VirtualMachine -Filter $filter -Property Name,Guest.HostName,summary.config.numcpu,summary.config.memorysizemb,summary.config.numEthernetCards,Summary.Config.NumVirtualDisks,Config.Uuid,Parent,Guest.GuestFamily,config.tools.toolsversion,guest.toolsstatus,config.Version,Config.ChangeTrackingEnabled,Datastore,AvailableField,Value | %{    ## $vm is the View of the current VM    $vm = $_    ## not used -- removed it    # $CustomDetails = Get-VM $_ | Select -ExpandProperty customfields    ## rewrote to use Get-View or UpdateViewData()    # $LunTierStringArray = Get-VM $_ | Get-Datastore    $LunTierStringArray = Get-View -Property Name -Id $vm.Datastore    $LunTierString = $LunTierStringArray.Name -split "_"    $vms = "" | Select-Object VMName, Cluster, DnsName, TotalCPU, TotalMemory, TotalNics, Disks, DiskTier, SDF, UUID, Folder, OS, ToolsVersion, ToolsStatus, HardwareVersion, CBT, Serial    $vms.VMName = $vm.Name    ## rewrote to use UpdateViewData()    # $vms.Cluster = $(Get-vm $_ | Get-cluster).Name    $vms.Cluster = &{$vm.UpdateViewData("Runtime.Host.Parent.Name"); $vm.Runtime.LinkedView.Host.LinkedView.Parent.Name}    $vms.DnsName = $vm.Guest.HostName    $vms.TotalCPU = $vm.summary.config.numcpu    $vms.TotalMemory = $vm.summary.config.memorysizemb    $vms.TotalNics = $vm.summary.config.numEthernetCards    $vms.Disks = $vm.Summary.Config.NumVirtualDisks    $vms.DiskTier = $LunTierString[0]    ## getting this in some other way, from the    # $vms.SDF = ($_ | Get-Annotation -CustomAttribute 'School/Division/Faculty').Value    $vms.SDF = & {$intCustomAttributeKey = ($vm.AvailableField | ?{$_.Name -eq "School/Division/Faculty"}).Key; ($vm.Value | ?{$_.Key -eq $intCustomAttributeKey}).Value}    $vms.UUID = $vm.Config.Uuid    ## add -Property Name, though, with " | Out-Null", does this even work?    # $current = Get-View $vm.Parent | Out-Null    $current = Get-View $vm.Parent -Property Name,Parent -ErrorAction:SilentlyContinue    $path = $vm.Name    do {         $parent = $current         if($parent.Name -ne "vm"){$path =  $parent.Name + "\" + $path}         ## add -Property Name, though, with " | Out-Null", does this even work?         $current = if ($null -ne $current.Parent) {Get-View $current.Parent -Property Name,Parent -ErrorAction:SilentlyContinue}    } while ($current.Parent -ne $null)    $vms.Folder = $path    $vms.OS = $vm.Guest.GuestFamily    $vms.ToolsVersion = $vm.config.tools.toolsversion    $vms.ToolsStatus = $vm.guest.toolsstatus    $vms.HardwareVersion = $vm.config.Version    $vms.CBT = $vm.Config.ChangeTrackingEnabled    $vms.Serial = Get-VMSerial -Uuid $vm.Config.Uuid    $VMReport += $vms    $Count++    ## added Write-Verbose so that the pipeline does not get polluted with strings (for the day that this code is returning objects for further manipulation down the pipeline, instead of going straight to CSV)  Write-Verbose -Verbose $Count}#Output$VMReport | Export-Csv vcenter_vm_report.csv_tmp -NoTypeInformation -UseCultureCopy-Item vcenter_vm_report.csv_tmp vcenter_vm_report.csv
  

  I commented on the changes I made (and why) and commented on by the code I replaced.  Give a run and see if it is not faster for you / your CMDB crew.

  Message has been edited by Matt Boren on February 24, 2015: correction of the piece that gets the path of the inventory of the VM (were able only to return a parent level previously) minor

• What query takes too long

  How can you know which application takes too long to run in a database? and most of the resources consumption?

  user3636719 wrote:
  How can you know which application takes too long to run in a database? and most of the resources consumption?

  Try to use the following text:

  SELECT * FROM
  (SELECT
  sql_fulltext,
  sql_id,
  child_number,
  disk_reads,
  executions,
  first_load_time,
  last_load_time
  V $ sql
  ORDER BY DESC elapsed_time)
  WHERE ROWNUM<>
  ;

  Also, try the v$ session_longops querying:

  Select * from)
  Select the target, sofar, less, totalwork.
  units, elapsed_seconds, message
  from v$ session_longops by start_time desc)
  where rownum<>

  Kind regards
  Rizwan Wangde
  SR Oracle DBA.
  http://Rizwan-DBA.blogspot.com

• Data dictionary query takes too long.

  Hello
  I'm using ORACLE DATABASE 11 g.
  
  The following query takes too long to run and not give the result. As I've tried a few tricks SQL Oracle but it forces developed.
  

  SELECT 
  distinct B.TABLE_NAME, 'Y' 
    FROM USER_IND_PARTITIONS A, USER_INDEXES B, USER_IND_SUBPARTITIONS C
   WHERE A.INDEX_NAME = B.INDEX_NAME
     AND A.PARTITION_NAME = C.PARTITION_NAME
     AND C.STATUS = 'UNUSABLE'
      OR A.STATUS = 'UNUSABLE'
      OR B.STATUS = 'INVALID';

  Please guide me what to do? to run this query in a fast paced mode...
  
  
  Thanks in advance...

  Your query is incorrect. It returns all tables if A.STATUS = "UNUSABLE" or B.STATUS = "INVALID". Most likely, you meant:

  SELECT
  distinct B.TABLE_NAME, 'Y'
    FROM USER_IND_PARTITIONS A, USER_INDEXES B, USER_IND_SUBPARTITIONS C
   WHERE A.INDEX_NAME = B.INDEX_NAME
     AND A.PARTITION_NAME = C.PARTITION_NAME
     AND (C.STATUS = 'UNUSABLE'
      OR A.STATUS = 'UNUSABLE'
      OR B.STATUS = 'INVALID');
  

  But the above will return sous-partitionnee tables not valid/no usable index. He ain't no non-sous-partitioned tables partitioned index/index not valid/not usable with same partitions in the form of tables not partitioned with valid/no unusable indexes. If you want to get any table with indexes not valid/not usable, you outer join that's going to hurt even more performance. I suggest you use the UNION:

  SELECT  DISTINCT TABLE_NAME,
                   'Y'
    FROM  (
            SELECT INDEX_NAME,'Y' FROM USER_INDEXES WHERE STATUS = 'INVALID'
           UNION ALL
            SELECT INDEX_NAME,'Y' FROM USER_IND_PARTITIONS WHERE STATUS = 'UNUSABLE'
           UNION ALL
            SELECT INDEX_NAME,'Y' FROM USER_IND_SUBPARTITIONS WHERE STATUS = 'UNUSABLE'
          ) A,
          USER_INDEXES B
    WHERE A.INDEX_NAME = B.INDEX_NAME
  /
  

  SY.

• How to find the lock and more information why the prg conc taking too long

  Oracle Apps R12-Orader management
  
  Hi all
  
  I am new to Oracle Apps, we I run my simultaneous program
  its taking too long to complete. How to find that there is a lock to produce in the table while that simultaneous execution of the program, another way to find why the simultaneous program takes too long to run and how can you speed up the process.
  
  Yesterday we made a few changes to speed up the process with our DBA to accelerate the simultaneous program
  
  The first simultaneous program takes 2 h 30 and after these changes taking 1 h 45. Please suggest it's okay
  
  Connected with the responsibility of the system administrator.
  
  Manager - set - Manager of the standard.
  
  Set the value of PROCESS like 15 (instead of 10).
  
  Set the value of SECONDS of SLEEP as 10 (Changed from 30).
  
  Manager - set - Manager2 Standard.
  
  Set the value of PROCESS like 15 (instead of 10).
  
  Set the value of SECONDS of SLEEP as 10 (Changed from 60).
  
  
  Any suggestion on how to find why it takes too much time.
  
  Any help is highly appricatable
  
  Thanks and greetings
  Srikkanth.M

  Hello

  I suggest you draw the simultaneous program and analyze the trace file. To do this, mark the simultaneous program as Trace enable (RESP system administrator, Menu simultaneous > program > define) and then run the program and download the trace file after dealing with tkprof. Check which are the staements who take most of the time and try to optimize them.

  It will be useful.