Implementation of SIDES in an environment high availability - is a cluster required?

Similar Questions

• Must all weblogic application servers share storage to implement high availability?

  I would like to understand if it takes a shared storage for all application servers that will run weblogic + oracle Identity Manager.  I used the following guides to oracle: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E40329_01/doc.1112/e28391/iam.htm#BABEJGID and http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/availability/maa-deployment-blueprint-1735105.pdf and my interpretation, both speak to configure all application servers with access to a shared storage.  From an architectural point of view, this means the entire application servers need access to an external hard drive?  If shared storage is necessary, what are the steps to implement?

  Thank you

  user12107187

  You can do it and it will work. But products of Fusion Middleware GDE to provide guidelines to help you implement high availability.

  Having a shared storage will help you recover from the failure of storage, otherwise this could be a point of failure.

  Enterprise Deployment Overview

  "An enterprise deployment Oracle Fusion Middleware:

  • Consider various business service level agreements (SLA to make best practices high availability there is as widely as possible)
  • Operates databases servers of grid and grid storage in low-cost storage to provide a very flexible, lower cost infrastructure
  • Uses the results of impact studies of performance for various configurations to ensure that the architecture of high availability is configured optimally to perform and that adapts to the needs of companies
  • Allows control over the length of time to recover from a failure and the amount of acceptable data loss of a natural disaster
  • Evolves with every version of Oracle and is completely independent of the hardware and operating system"

  Best regards

  Luz

• Implemented shared disk high availability with TimesTen11

  Hi all
  
  I need to have shared disk high availability using cluster on AIX HACMP
  Could you please share steps/info, this application with the TimesTen11.
  
  Kind regards
  -AK
  
  Published by: tt0008 on Sep 9, 2010 02:09

  Hello

  We do not really recommend using disc shared according to HA with TimesTen since it is a bit complex to install and (b) is not officially a "supported" configuration Also, failover and recovery times are usually much longer than with a HA configuration based on TimesTen replication. I would like to invite you to consider using the TimesTen for HA replication. That's what it is designed for, and this is the recommended approach.

  Kind regards

  Chris

• Bridges 2 1552 for high availability using

  Switches: 3560

  routers: 2811

  AP: 1552e

  We have 4 1552 AP we would like for installation in a point-to-point environment. Currently, they are light but would make us independent for this scenario, unless there is a feature in the controller that would achieve what it takes I don't know.

  We would like to implement in pairs on each side with the 1st goal consisting of high-availability so if one goes down there is still connectivity. Our second objective would be to use the two AP for higher bandwidth.

  I thought I'd try to configure a port channel, but as I read it, you can't do it, but I would like to know if I'm wrong. I saw where someone else tried to do the same thing in the forums and there were some responses, but the links do not work for me.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/HW/wireless/ps5279/products_tech_note09186a0080736199.shtml<----- doesn't="" work="" for="">

  Just look at showing up in the best possible direction. It seems that routing should take care of what we need, but would like to see if there are any other avenues.

  Thanks in advance.

  The best thing you can do is to configure each P2P connection as a trunk and use priority of vlan spanning tree in order to balance traffic between the two links.  You can't really bundle, because the bridge that sends the traffic expected for the traffic to come back through it.  It's the best way to use the two bridges, this is how it has been done in the past and how its still quite well done.

  Thank you

  Scott

  Help others by using the rating system and marking answers questions as 'response '.

• IPS high-availability Solution

  Hi all

  obligation to have redundancy for appliance IPS placed on data center design, I dug on Cisco docs but found the resilience and the HA (High Availability) from the point of view of IPS could take place in the side of switches (HSRP/Eth channel balance).

  is there a visible way to implement high availability of dynamically!

  Kind regards

  Belal

  Yes Belal, both of the things mentioned by you are right. There is no function available which allows "failover" communications between IPS two boxes as do Cisco firewalls.

  Yes Etherchannel load balance traffic to each pair of IP from sensor single src - dst.

  Concerning

  Farrukh

• The OAM Console in a deployment architecture high availability

  Hello

  I'm looking to implement a HA for OAM environment and read the various docs that the OAM console is deployed on the AdminServer. However, when I read the Oracle documentation on Oracle Fusion Middleware high availability Guide for Oracle Identity and Access Management

  It gives the URL in the console of the OAM as the link to test the server managed, which means that OAMConsole is accessible on the ManagedServer. Is there anywhere I can find a definitive answer on how OAMConsole is deployed and in the what server / cluster?

  Ideally, I'd like the OAMConsole app deployed to the cluster (instead of the AdminServer) in order to achieve for her AP.

  Thank you

  oamconsole is deployed on the AdminServer, and there may be only one admin server active per domain.

  The link that you are referring is on setting up a cluster OAM. Oracle encourages a cluster OAM of 2 instances that are deployed on 2 physical servers. The server administrator is recommended to set up an alias to separate host that they refer as a VIP that is linked to a separate IP as the OAM instance on the same host address. A clone of the Admin instance is then placed on the second physical server corresponding to the second instance OAM. In the case of the first instance OAM and the server administrator is not available, a reconfiguration of network must be made to move the VIP to the second instance. Once this is done, the server administrator can be started on the second server.

  This gives you a little HA/DR.

• It is possible and effective: high availability (failover) on 2 guests with local storage?

  Hello

  I have a discussion on the implementation of ha (failover) with 2 guests with local storage.

  My advice is to go with a shared storage. But there is another view, use the cluster failover MS with local storage service to save on the shared storage hardware.

  2 "mirorred" on each host machines. Is it feasible at all?

  The HughesNet: have 2 virtual machines (SQL server and server applications in a highly available environment). The workload of the machines will be raised to 2 very powerful servers that are supposed to be buying.

  1. Please briefly explain a feature of local storage to provide HA.

  2. I got to cluster in the virtual environment, not so I guess that the shared storage is used only in the virtual environment.

  Thank you.

  Michael.

  There is software that can replicate a running, physical or virtual machine to another accessible location on the network. This could be as simple that between two close hosted ESXi of VMS or high-speed WAN. Take a look at things like neverfail, doubletake others.  The costs would probably be a bit prohibitive in a smaller environment. It might be possible and maybe even practice to use a virtual storage device having a failover replication. Use of storage on each host and allows to provide the data store. Open-e

  The Microsoft Clustering solution needs a shared storage.

• Configuration of high availability.

  Hello

  Please help me to configure high availability for Foglight existing environment, please send me the steps and requirements of pre.

  How many servers can exist in a cluster?

  Capacity how do we need on the primary server and the other servers if there is a failure?

  We currently have 1 unifying and 3 child FMS.

  version: 5.6.10

  Thank you

  Vicky

  Vicky,

  There are 2 very useful field guides that go through the requirements and the Setup process.

  High Availability Guide - http://edocs.quest.com/foglight/5610/doc/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/frameset.htm?context=field&file=HA-field/index.php&single=true

  Federation of field guide-

  http://eDOCS.quest.com/Foglight/5610/doc/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/HTML/frameset.htm?context=field&file=Federation-field/index.php&single=true

  Note the following points, known issue

  http://eDOCS.quest.com/Foglight/5611/doc/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/HTML/frameset.htm?context=field&file=HA-field/overview.1.php&single=true

  "A master of the Federation running in mode high availability is not supported. Only children Federated can be run by high availability. »

  Golan

• High availability of components in the design of vWorkspace tips

  Hi all

  Would ask you some advice regarding the design of vWorkspace components highly available. Suppose that vWorkspace components will be deployed in vSphere or hypervisors managed SCVMM hence HA is in place, if the failure of a host. In this situation, if we still need components redundant (n + 1 VMS) vWorkspace?

  On the other note, I understand that we can add a couple of broker for vWorkspace in vWorkspace Management Console connections and based on KB 99163 it would just work. I'm not sure how the traffic would be when an application is web access? As in, I guess that the connection broker news would be 'defined' at the request of the web call to the broker for connections. Or this is done automatically? Access Web would choose randomly from the broker for connections to go?

  Thanks for any advice in advance

  Kind regards

  Cyril

  Hi Cyril,.

  Big questions. As with any IT architecture in layers, you must plan HA and redundancy at all points of failure required by your environment or level of Service (SLA) agreements. For vWorkspace, the center of his universe is SQL and you must plan accordingly the failure and recovery. In some environments, full backup can meet the requirement of HA. In others, full SQL Cluster, Mirroring, replication, or Always-On configurations may be required. With our broker, we recommend N + 1 deployment in most scenarios HA. When you move peripheral components or enabling, you must evaluate each component and needs its impact of failure as well as its valuation to determine the appropriate AP.

  Load balancing between several brokers is done automatically by logic in the client connectors. In the case of Web access, when you configure the site Web Access in the Management Console, it includes broker list in the Web access configuration xml file. As client connectors, Web Access includes balancing logic that distributes the client load on brokers available automatically.

  If you have any questions about specific components and requirements of HA or architecture, please add them in the discussions.

• Deployment of high availability of the IPCC 4.5

  In a future HD architecture implementation, the voice service will provide CallManager 5.0, that will integrate with 4.5 of the IPCC. 4.5 (required with 5.0 CM) IPCC does implement a high availability. How can we ensure that technical support continues to operate if the IPCC goes down? One possibility might be to configure CM such that if the IPCC goes down, all the number of help desk calls are automatically and immediately headed to a group (which includes all extensions help desk). This redirection can be configured in CM? Is there a better option?

  Thanks in advance,

  SB

  This is your best bet. On the road Points for your call center just put the call before busy, no answer and failure to the fighter pilot. Thus, when the IPCC Express Server is down it will sent to your fighter pilot.

  Please evaluate the useful messages.

  adignan - berbee

• NAC Manager high availability peer CAM DEAD

  Hello

  I have two managers of the NAC with high availability and I used both interface eth1 of sides as a link Heartbit.

  I did following steps for high availability.

  (1) synchronize the time between two cams.

  (2) generate a temporary SSL certificate in CAMs and import-export procedure made in the other.

  (3) make a CAM as a primary and the other as secondary.

  But after all this made configuration I can see the State in surveillance > reports-primary CAM is in place in both servers and redundant CAM is down.

  Also on the failover tab, I can see - Local CAM - OK [Active] and counterpart CAM:-DEAD.

  I have attached some screenshots so that you can find the same.

  Your help will be very appreciated.

  Thank you

  Try these steps and check that all steps were followed:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/NAC-appliance-clean-access/99945-NAC-cam-HA.html

• High availability with two 5508 WLAN controllers?

  Hi all

  We are considerung to implement a new wireless solution based on Cisco WLC 5508 and 1262N Access Points. We intend to buy about 30 access points and have two options: either buy a WLC 5508-50 or, for redundancy to, two controllers 5508-25.

  Is it possible to configure two WLC 5508 as a high availability solution, so that all access points are distributed on the two WLCs and during breaks WLC one another case manages all the APs?

  If we have 30 access points, and one of the two WLC 5508-25 breaks of course that not all access to 30 but only 25 points can be managed by one remaining. Is there some sort of control to choose the access points must be managed and which do not?

  How does such a configuration looks like in general, is the implementation of an installation of two controller quite complex or simple?

  Thank you!

  Michael

  Hi Michael,

  Do not forget that the 5508 works with a system of licensing. The hardware can support up to 500 APs, but it depends on the license that you put in.

  I think 2 5508 with 25 APs license will be more expensive than a 5508 with 50 APs license.

  If you have 2 WLCs, the best is NOT to spread access between the WLCs points. In doing so, you increase the complexity of homelessness (WLCs have to discount customers to each other all the time). If your point was to gain speed, it really doesn't matter as the 5508 can have up to 8 Gbit/s of uplink speed and has the ability of UC to treat 50 APs with no problems at all. So I find it best to have all the access points on 1 WLC, then if something goes wrong, all the APs migrate anyway for the other WLC.

  If you want 50 APs at a 25-degree WLC failover, you can select who will join Yes. The APs have a priority system, so you assign priorities. If the WLC sees it's full capacity but higher priority APs are trying to join, it will kick down-prio APs for the high prio allow to connect.

  WLCs is not exactly "HA." It's just that if you have 2 WLCs work together (as if you had 700 APs and needed to put 2 WLCs) and delivered to customers. Or all APs sat on a WLC and when it breaks down, they join the other available controller.

  The only thing to do is to put each WLC in the same group of mobility so that they know.

• 11.1.1.7 OBIEE integration in workspace 11.1.2.4 (high available)

  Hi people,

  I used the method in my dev where there is no high-availability configuration, it works perfectly, however in my environment of TST with the installation of high availability, the OBIEE SSO does not work, John Goodwin to integrate 2 environments.

  Anyone have a success story with high available?

  Thank you

  Fixed a problem, it was to virtualize = parameter true... but strangely, this same setting was not there when I install DEV environment, and DEV works very well.

• High availability of Hyperion 11.1.2.3

  Hello

  We need to implement high availability.  The Oracle document shows compact deployment and horizontal scale (and may be this is the reason for which it does not deploy serve App on the second server).  But what happens if we want to affect a server run for each component of Hyperion individually.  Say, how to implement HA exclusively to a shared service with its own managed server?  In windows, I must have Domain IDs to ensure high availability?  Have no ad servers and used local id to install Hyperion successfully for the implementation of many.

  Thank you.

  If you have deployed an application of java web to its own server, you can change this possibility / on other servers in the cluster managed.

  Take a look at the Clustering Java Applications using EMP Web Configurator system

  See you soon

  John

• EBS high availability VS. Continuity

  Hi all

  I'm confused about high availability and business continuity.

  They are the same or similar?

  Assuming I have cluster tier1 Apps and Apps-teir2 installation on the same instance.

  If Apps-teir1 fails, users assigned to that transferred to Apps - level 2 will be and vice versa?

  If they do fail-overed in another layer Apps, what do you call this kind of configuration?

  Is - this high availability and business continuity? or other type of installation available in EBS?

  How about the Site configuration after disaster with dataguard standby server.

  If the PROD fails, it will automatically transfer to the Site of recovery with dataguard. Can it be called high-availability as well?

  Kindly enlighten please...

  Thank you very much

  JC

  For your type of installation, it will work, but you have to take care now

  1.) as DB side is supported by the installer of dataguard, phase applications file system, you will need to find ways to transfer files on Server2. Maybe you can use Rsync.

  2.) failure to PROD you convert DB mode ensures prod.

  3.) next to the application, you will need to run the combination adcfgclone/autoconfig (what URL you want to have Dr. Côté, CM Setup etc.)

  Please be aware that in the case of installation Ebiz DR there will always a downtime (you can reduce to a minimum the same but can't avoid it)

  concerning

  Pravin